The Wikipedia for SpiesAnd Where It Goes From Here – WIRED
Slide: 1 / of 1. Caption: Nicholas Rigg/Getty Images
Major General Dale Meyerrose jokes that he doesnt think much of millennials. But he does largely credit that generation with fundamentally changing the way the US intelligence community collaborates.
In 2005, when Meyerrose worked as the Associate Director of National Intelligence, he was tasked with figuring out how to get 16 different spy agenciesall accustomed to decades of siloed secrecyto talk to each other. In the end, one of his most lasting accomplishments was championing a small grassroots effort led by young analysts that resulted in what would become Intellipedia.
Think of Intellipedia as a Wikipedia for spies. It works the same, except that theres no anonymity for contributors, and nothing can ever be unsourced. Its contents range from Unclassified to Top Secret, though its the lowest rung of Top Secret. Anyone in the executive branchwhich includes the intelligence communityhas enough clearance to access it. According to one intelligence official who asked to remain anonymous because he was not authorized to speak publicly on behalf of the community, the Intellipedia that exists today is part wiki, part bulletin board, part internal newspaper. Its a great place to come in and see whats happening in the community as a whole, the official says.
Thats helpful, but its not the game-changing collaboration tool National Geospatial Intelligence-Agency analyst Chris Rasmussen, who was one of Intellipedias earliest and most ardent users, had hoped for. Back in 2006, he and his fellow Intellipedians, as they called themselves, imagined full crowd-sourced intelligence reports, those official documents that land on the desks of high-level government officials and shape foreign and domestic policy. Its fallen well short. Intellipedia helped the intelligence community catch up to Web 2.0, but still has far to go before it lives up to its original promise.
In the days after 9/11, intelligence operatives learned that their aversion to sharing information had allowed warnings about the attack to go unheeded. The spy agencies were operating as they had since the Cold War, when their main enemy was the Soviet Union, a monolith they understood and, more importantly, could predict. Now, not only was the enemy more broadly distributed, there was more information than ever, and no single place to organize and share it.
The idea for Intellipedia first caught on after D. Calvin Andrus, an Innovation Officer at the CIA, wrote an essay in 2005 that suggested the same power of Wikipedia and blogs to aggregate and share information could also support the high-stakes world of spying. The essay spread, and before long, Meyerrose gave the all-clear to set up a server to try it out. It was truly a grassroots effort, bottom up in the analyst community, he says.
What wasnt obvious to the powers-that-be back then, before the iPhone or Facebook existed, was that anyone would use it. Nobody thought it would catch on, Meyerrose says. Looking back on it, Im absolutely certain of all the senior officials I told Oh, this is a good idea, most of them thought that it would die of its own weight.
It didnt. Rasmussen and the other young analysts just kept writing articles and submitting them to the growing Intellipedia library. There was cachet in getting your contributions accepted. When people contested facts in the discussion section, things got hairy. This is tribal warfare, Meyerrose says. By 2008, when he retired, he couldnt go into any field office and not see a shortcut to Intellipedia on every computer screen.
Over a decade since its inception, Intellipedia has grown into a standard part of the intelligence communitys workday. It has a homepage with featured and developing articles, help pages, and requests for collaboration. You can find tips on tradecraft in its pages, and primers on conflicts in certain parts of the world. After news broke Tuesday of a leak of CIA hacking data, you can bet theres a page explaining whats known about that. It runs on Intelink, the internal classified intranet network that links all the agencies and is operated by a team overseen by DNI.
Its the spying worlds office water cooler.
The New York Times reported last week that Obama aides had scrambled to get as much information about the investigation into Russias meddling with the 2016 election onto Intellipedia as they could, knowing that would mean a broad range of analysts across multiple agencies would see it. Which makes sense. Intellipedia can help spark conversation. Its the spying worlds office water cooler.
Rasmussen always wanted it to be more, though. His dream was that eventually analysts could use Intellipediaor something like itto streamline the process of creating National Intelligence Estimates. But when Intellipedians tried to write NIEs on Intellipedia in 2006, 2007, bureaucracy got in the way. Every agency has a slightly different process for writing reports, and getting people to deviate from that for something so radically crowd-sourced proved impossible.
Realizing Intellipedia wasnt ever going to be accepted as an official voice of the intel community, Rasmussen tried to create a more official version of it after-the-fact. He called it the Living Intelligence System, and you can watch his YouTube video pitch about the specifics of how it worked here. Though it won accolades from the community, and became a real opt-in program, Living Intelligence never caught on.
Everyone agreed that the tech was better, most people agreed that the process benefits were better, but they just couldnt make the pivot, Rasmussen says.
But Rasmussen is tenacious. He fervently believes that the intelligence community would benefit from streamlined collaboration. To find a place for it, he just needed a part of the process that wasnt already mired in bureaucracy.
He found it by focusing on a specific chunk of most intelligence reports. Any given report will be roughly 20-percent classified infothe spooky stuff, Rasmussen calls itand 80-percent unclassified context and background that someone reading the spooky stuff needs to know to understand why the hell it matters. Its less sensitive. It represents an opportunity.
For the past few years, Rasmussen has led a team working to create an entirely new way to crowdsource that 80 percent. It still wont live up to that original dream of fully crowdsourced reportingbut it could get the community most of the way. Itll even, because this is 2017, have an app.
As Meyerrose would say, the millennials will love that.
Read more here:
The Wikipedia for SpiesAnd Where It Goes From Here - WIRED
- Exclusive | Why Mary-Louise Parker refuses to look at her Wikipedia page: Its bad - Page Six - July 14th, 2025 [July 14th, 2025]
- Opinion: How Wikipedia became one of the greatest inventions of the modern age - The Globe and Mail - July 12th, 2025 [July 12th, 2025]
- The Last of Us Part 2 has a 'chronological mode' now, in case you wanted to play through a story with all the finesse of a Wikipedia plot summary - PC... - July 10th, 2025 [July 10th, 2025]
- Many Wikipedia Articles Are Outdated or Incorrect - Yahoo - July 8th, 2025 [July 8th, 2025]
- Wikipedia Vs. Epistemic Insecurity: Why the World's Most Trusted Website Still Matters 06/30/2025 - MediaPost - July 2nd, 2025 [July 2nd, 2025]
- Mark O'Connell: I love Wikipedia so much, I hardly even minded when it killed me off - The Irish Times - June 29th, 2025 [June 29th, 2025]
- History of Wikipedia - Australian Broadcasting Corporation - June 28th, 2025 [June 28th, 2025]
- 60 Times Wikipedia Articles Were So Scary And Unsettling People Just Had To Know More - Bored Panda - June 24th, 2025 [June 24th, 2025]
- 60 Times Wikipedia Articles Were So Scary And Unsettling People Just Had To Know More - inkl - June 24th, 2025 [June 24th, 2025]
- Wikipedia Is The Latest Place To Join The Daily Gaming Craze - Kotaku - June 22nd, 2025 [June 22nd, 2025]
- Wikipedia Did What No One Expected: This Open Platform Just Proved Its Possible to Fight Back Against Powerful AI Systems - Rude Baguette - June 22nd, 2025 [June 22nd, 2025]
- Terrifying Survey Claims ChatGPT Has Overtaken Wikipedia - futurism.com - May 24th, 2025 [May 24th, 2025]
- Wikipedia wants you to wear your love for an open internet on your sleeve - Fast Company - May 24th, 2025 [May 24th, 2025]
- Wikipedia knew first? What really happened after Portnovs killing in Madrid - Euro Weekly News - May 24th, 2025 [May 24th, 2025]
- Can Wikipedia survive the rise of AI and the age of Donald Trump? - Australian Broadcasting Corporation - May 11th, 2025 [May 11th, 2025]
- Wikipedia fights the UKs flawed and burdensome online safety rules - The Verge - May 10th, 2025 [May 10th, 2025]
- Not courts duty to tell media to delete this and take that down: SC sets aside Delhi HCs order to take down page on ANI vs Wikipedia case - The Indian... - May 10th, 2025 [May 10th, 2025]
- Propaganda tool row: SC reverses Wikipedia takedown in ANI defamation case - Siasat.com - May 10th, 2025 [May 10th, 2025]
- Wikipedia is using (some) generative AI now - The Verge - May 8th, 2025 [May 8th, 2025]
- Jay-Z Accuses Attorney Of Wikipedia Manipulation In Legal Battle - Evrim Aac - May 8th, 2025 [May 8th, 2025]
- US jurist accuses Wikipedia of disseminating propaganda and rewriting history - MSN - May 8th, 2025 [May 8th, 2025]
- Wikipedia Foundation Withdraws Appeal Before Delhi High Court Following Supreme Court Ruling - The Law Advice - May 8th, 2025 [May 8th, 2025]
- Generative AI will help Wikipedia editors moderate, translate, and onboard newcomers - the-decoder.com - May 8th, 2025 [May 8th, 2025]
- Wikipedia will apply generative AI to support editors and reduce technical barriers - The Weekly Journal - May 8th, 2025 [May 8th, 2025]
- Wikipedia turns to generative AI to support its volunteer community - TechSpot - May 8th, 2025 [May 8th, 2025]
- How is Wikipedia Progressive in the Age of AI? - Analytics Insight - May 8th, 2025 [May 8th, 2025]
- Members of Congress call on Wikipedia to curb its antisemitism - Israel National News - May 8th, 2025 [May 8th, 2025]
- Is Wikipedia in trouble? - London Evening Standard - April 12th, 2025 [April 12th, 2025]
- Wikipedia Has an Alter Ego Thats Obsessed With Questions. Everyone Should Browse It. - Slate - April 12th, 2025 [April 12th, 2025]
- ANI vs Wikipedia: What the case is about and what has happened so far - Business Standard - April 12th, 2025 [April 12th, 2025]
- Delhi HC refuses to stay order asking Wikipedia to remove alleged defamatory description of ANI - The Economic Times - April 10th, 2025 [April 10th, 2025]
- The ADL says Wikipedia contains antisemitic bias, amid dispute over how the Israel-Hamas conflict is represented on the site - CNN - March 22nd, 2025 [March 22nd, 2025]
- I Tried a TikTok-Style Version of Wikipedia, and It's Now My Favorite Way of Learning - MUO - MakeUseOf - March 22nd, 2025 [March 22nd, 2025]
- How obscure is prospective Celtics buyer William Chisholm? He didnt have a Wikipedia page until Thursday. - The Boston Globe - March 22nd, 2025 [March 22nd, 2025]
- How biased Wikipedia trashed Trumps nominees after he named them - New York Post - March 22nd, 2025 [March 22nd, 2025]
- Deconstructing Wikipedia: Its biased, lopsided and partisan - The Sunday Guardian - March 22nd, 2025 [March 22nd, 2025]
- ADL report finds clear evidence of anti-Israel bias among Wikipedia editors - JNS.org - March 22nd, 2025 [March 22nd, 2025]
- ADL: Anti-Israel Wikipedia editors colluding in anti-Israel bias on site - The Times of Israel - March 22nd, 2025 [March 22nd, 2025]
- What happens when Wikipedia, Joe Biden, and Ms. Frizzle walk into a reality show? - Queen's Journal - March 22nd, 2025 [March 22nd, 2025]
- Wikipedia posts updated to smear Patel, Hegseth, Gabbard: Watchdog - Washington Examiner - March 22nd, 2025 [March 22nd, 2025]
- John Oliver Marvels at Wikipedia Page of Mel Gibson's Father: Somehow Your Son 'Is Not the Worst Thing About You' - TheWrap - March 22nd, 2025 [March 22nd, 2025]
- Wikipedia disrupted by edit wars to manipulate pages on war in Gaza with at least 14 editors banned: report - New York Post - March 13th, 2025 [March 13th, 2025]
- Volunteer photographers are fixing Wikipedia's terrible celebrity headshots - Engadget - March 13th, 2025 [March 13th, 2025]
- Photographers Are on a Mission to Fix Wikipedia's Famously Bad Celebrity Portraits - 404 Media - March 13th, 2025 [March 13th, 2025]
- Wikipedia roiled with internal strife over page edits about the Middle East - Detroit News - March 13th, 2025 [March 13th, 2025]
- Wikipedia has a huge gender equality problem heres why it matters - The Conversation Indonesia - March 13th, 2025 [March 13th, 2025]
- Wikipedia Co-founder: It's Not Neutral, Needs to Be Investigated - Newsmax - March 13th, 2025 [March 13th, 2025]
- Volunteer Photographers Tackle Terrible Celeb Headshots on Wikipedia - PCMag UK - March 13th, 2025 [March 13th, 2025]
- Bored? Check out the Museum of All Things and dive into Wikipedia in 3D - GamingOnLinux - March 3rd, 2025 [March 3rd, 2025]
- This free interactive museum lets you explore Wikipedia like never before - Digital Trends - March 3rd, 2025 [March 3rd, 2025]
- The Wild World of Wikipedia Speedrunning - LAFM - March 3rd, 2025 [March 3rd, 2025]
- Wikipedia co-founder's open challenge to Musk: Which US govt branches 'paid to edit, monitor, update, lobby' the website? - Business Today - March 3rd, 2025 [March 3rd, 2025]
- Wikipedia co-founder may just have agreed with Elon Musk in his first viral post in a few years - The Times of India - February 27th, 2025 [February 27th, 2025]
- Elon Musk wants to change the name of Wikipedia $1 billion on the table to achieve it - Unin Rayo - February 27th, 2025 [February 27th, 2025]
- Wikipedia is now an endless 3D museum, and admission is free - Rock Paper Shotgun - February 27th, 2025 [February 27th, 2025]
- This slick new service puts ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Wikipedia on the map - Fast Company - February 27th, 2025 [February 27th, 2025]
- From agnostic to believer: Wikipedia co-founder publicly shares his testimony - CHVN Radio - February 27th, 2025 [February 27th, 2025]
- Wikipedia co-founder's request to Donald Trump and Elon Musk to probe the dubious website - OpIndia - February 27th, 2025 [February 27th, 2025]
- User booked for adding content on Chhatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj on Wikipedia - The Times of India - February 27th, 2025 [February 27th, 2025]
- Remove derogatory and objectionable reference from Wikipedia about Sambhaji Maharaj: Fadnavis - Deccan Herald - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- 'There's limit to free speech': Fadnavis orders action against Wikipedia content - The Times of India - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- Why these scientists devote time to editing and updating Wikipedia - Nature.com - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- Elon Musk's 'reminder' to Wikipedia: $1 billion offer for name change to ... still stands; come on, do .. - The Times of India - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- Maharashtra CM directs cyber police to get objectionable content on Sambhaji Maharaj removed from Wikipedia - The Indian Express - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- Elon Musk and Wikipedia are feuding - The Week - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- Wikipedia UnReliable Sources: Case Study How Wikipedia is Rigged to Prevent Balance When It Comes to Religious Articles - World Religion News - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- Behind the Blog: Backdoors and the Miracle of Wikipedia - 404 Media - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- What if TikTok and Wikipedia had a baby? - The Washington Post - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- How Wikipedia Co-Founder Found Faith After 35 Years as a Nonbeliever - Movieguide - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- Wikipedia, Are You Ready? Musk's $1 Billion Name Change Offer Still On - Analytics Insight - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- Remove objectional reference about Sambhaji Maharaj from Wikipedia: Fadnavis - The Hindu - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- Zee 24 TAAS forces Wikipedia to take action on false content about Chhatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj - MediaNews4U - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- Elon Musks $1 Billion Wikipedia Challenge: Reality or Stunt? - The Octant - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- Fadnavis asks to remove objectionable Wikipedia content on Sambhaji Maharaj - Business Standard - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- Kumbh mela among most viewed content on Wikipedia - The Times of India - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- This Web App Is TikTok for Reading Wikipedia - Lifehacker - February 14th, 2025 [February 14th, 2025]
- An infinite Wikipedia scroll I created in mere hours went viral. I think people may be tired of curated algorithms. - Business Insider - February 14th, 2025 [February 14th, 2025]
- Wikipedia Prepares for 'Increase in Threats' to US Editors From Musk and His Allies - 404 Media - February 12th, 2025 [February 12th, 2025]
- Want to know how the world ends? Try this Wikipedia page - The Guardian - February 12th, 2025 [February 12th, 2025]
- Anti-algorithm app combines Wikipedia and TikTok to combat brain rot - Interesting Engineering - February 12th, 2025 [February 12th, 2025]