The shocking truth about Wikipedias Holocaust disinformation – Forward
Artistic rendering of an editor adding Holocaust distortions to wikipedia Photo by iStock/Creative Commons/Forward Montage
Shira Klein June 14, 2023
Manipulating Wikipedia is all the rage these days. Companies, governments and even presidential candidates reportedly do it.
Yet we sleep well at night because we trust Wikipedias editors will protect us from blatant disinformation. After all, there are 125,000 active editors on English Wikipedia, 460 administrators and a 12-member Arbitration Committee, often dubbed Wikipedias Supreme Court. Above these volunteers towers the Wikimedia Foundation, with its 700-strong staff. Together, it comprises an entire security system.
This month, we are seeing the system fail. And it is time for the Wikimedia Foundation to get involved.
My colleague and I recently exposed a persistent Holocaust disinformation campaign on English Wikipedia.
The study, which I published with Jan Grabowski from the University of Ottawa, examined two dozen Wikipedia articles on the Holocaust in Poland and over 300 back pages (including talk pages, noticeboards, and arbitration cases, spaces where editors decide what the rest of the world will accept as fact).
To our dismay, we found dozens of examples of Holocaust distortion which, taken together, advanced a Polish nationalist narrative, whitewashed the role of Polish society in the Holocaust and bolstered harmful stereotypes about Jews.
People who read these pages learned about Jews supposed complicity in their own catastrophe, gangs of Jewish collaborators aiding the Gestapo and Jews supporting the communists to betray Poles. A handful of distortions have been corrected since our publication, but many remain.
A fraction of it is true: There were scattered instances of Jewish collaboration in WWII, for example. But Wikipedia inflates their scale and prominence. In one article that remains gravely distorted, alleged Jewish collaboration with the Nazis takes up more space than the Ukrainian, Belorussian and ethnic German collaboration combined.
In one glaring hoax discovered by an Israeli reporter, Wikipedia claimed for 15 years that the Germans annihilated 200,000 non-Jewish Poles in a giant gas chamber in the middle of Warsaw.
Wikipedias ArbCom just released aruling responding to our study, sanctioning several editors. While this may seem promising, in fact, ArbComs actions should concern anyone who cares about disinformation.
The problem is not the individual arbitrators, nor even ArbCom as a whole; the committees mandate is to judge conduct, never content. This is a good policy. We wouldnt want arbitrators, who are anonymous volunteers with no expertise in any particular subject, to control content. Wikipedias strength lies in its enabling anyone to edit, democratizing knowledge like never before.
But this leaves a gaping hole in Wikipedias security apparatus. Its safeguards only protect us from fake information when enough editors reach a consensus that the information is indeed fake. When an area is dominated by a group of individuals pushing an erroneous point of view, then wrong information becomes the consensus.
Wikipedias structure leaves it vulnerable to be exploited by any small group of people willing to spend the time to control the content, whether they are from a government or a corporation or are simply ideologically driven private individuals.
In theory, anyone can edit Wikipedia; no editor has any ownership over any article. Yet over the years, anyone who tried to fix distortions related to Holocaust disinformation faced a team of fierce editors who guard old lies and produce new ones.
These few editors, with no evident ties to any government, sport playful pseudonyms, such as Piotrus (Little Peter in Polish) or Volunteer Marek. But they are a resilient team whose seniority and prolific editing across the encyclopedia give them high status in Wikipedias editorial community. Methodically and patiently, they go from article to article, removing and adding content until it aligns with a Polish nationalist worldview. They misrepresent sources, use unreliable sources, and push fringe points of view.
To be sure, Wikipedia has policies in place to prevent source misrepresentation, unreliable sources and fringe claims. If an editor commits these violations repeatedly, administrators and arbitrators can kick them out.
But administrators and arbitrators lack the expertise to recognize when a source has been misrepresented. Instead, they focus on editors interpersonal conduct. Editors who are uncivil, aggressive or long-winded find themselves sanctioned, while those who are polite and show a willingness to compromise generally emerge unscathed, regardless of the content they author.
This problem is not unique to Wikipedias treatment of the Holocaust. A similar disinformation campaign is taking place in Wikipedias articles on Native American history, where influential editors misrepresent sources to the effect of erasing Native history and whitewashing American settler colonial violence. The Wikipedia article on Andrew Jackson, plagued by such manipulations, attracts thousands of readers a day.
This was the third ArbCom case on the Holocaust to make the same mistakes. ArbCom paid lip service to the importance of tackling source manipulations, while completely disregarding dozens of such problems presented to them by our study and by concerned editors. By ignoring egregiously false content, and focusing only on editors civility, ArbCom sends the message that theres no problem with falsifying the past, as long as you are nice about it.
The results are tragic: The arbitrators have banned one editor who, as our article showed, had brought in trustworthy scholarship to rebut the distortions. They sanctioned another editor for documenting the distortionists whitewashing of current Polish antisemitic figurines (called, tellingly, Jew with a Coin).
Worse still, they have described as exemplary a distortionist editor who has defended Holocaust revisionist Ewa Kurek. Kurek has claimed that Jews had fun in the Warsaw ghetto and that COVID-19 is a Jewfication of Europe. Two additional editors who were banned are indeed distortionists, but the ban (appealable in 12 months) responded to their bad manners, not their manipulation of history.
The Wikimedia Foundation needs to intervene, as it has already done to stem disinformation in Chinese Wikipedia, Saudi Wikipedia and Croatian Wikipedia, with excellent results. It must do so in English Wikipedia as well.
In a statement they issued last week in response to press inquiries about our study and the recent ArbCom decision, the foundation said, Wikipedias volunteer editors act as a vigilant first line of defense.
But what is the second line of defense? What happens when cases keep bouncing back to ArbCom, as has occurred with the Holocaust in Poland, India-Pakistan, Armenia-Azerbaijan and gender and sexuality, to mention just a few controversies?
The Wikimedia Foundation must harness subject-matter experts to assist volunteer editors. In cases where Wikipedias internal measures fail repeatedly, the foundation should commission scholars mainstream scholars who are currently publishing in reputable peer-reviewed presses and work in universities unencumbered by state dictates to weigh in.
In the case of Wikipedias coverage of Holocaust history, there is a need for an advisory board of established historians who would be available to advise editors on a sources reliability, or help administrators understand whether a source has been misrepresented.
The foundation certainly has the resources to build more bridges with academia: It boasts an annual revenue of $155 million, mostly from the publics donations. The public deserves a Wikipedia that provides not just any knowledge, but accurate knowledge, and asking for academics help is a necessary next step in Wikipedias ongoing development.
This is no radical departure from Wikipedias ethos of democratized knowledge that anyone can edit. This is an additional safeguard to ensure Wikipedias existing content policies are actually upheld.
Academia must also play its part to keep Wikipedia accurate. Scholars should uncover Wikipedias weaknesses and flag them for editors to fix, instead of snubbing Wikipedia as unreliable. Wikipedia is the seventh-most-visited site on the internet, most peoples first and last stop for information. All the more so with ChatGPT, which amplifies online content to a deafening pitch.
Volunteer editors and professional experts need to work together to get it right.
To contact the author, email [emailprotected]
Shira Klein is an associate professor of history at Chapman University in California and co-author of the study, Wikipedias Intentional Distortion of the History of the Holocaust in The Journal of Holocaust Research.
The views and opinions expressed in this article are the authors own and do not necessarily reflect those of the Forward. Discover more perspective in Opinion.
Read more from the original source:
The shocking truth about Wikipedias Holocaust disinformation - Forward
- Made J. Cole look like he died in the war: Drake vs Kendrick Lamar Rap Battle Gets a World War 2 Styled Wikipedia ... - FandomWire - May 7th, 2024 [May 7th, 2024]
- Five Jokes from the First Season of The Simpsons You Now Need Wikipedia to Understand - Cracked.com - May 7th, 2024 [May 7th, 2024]
- Mastodon Play 'Wikipedia: Fact or Fiction?' - Loudwire - March 30th, 2024 [March 30th, 2024]
- Wolff contacted Verstappen to explain Wikipedia statement - GPblog - March 30th, 2024 [March 30th, 2024]
- Tulu Wikipedia more than doubles in size in seven years - The Hindu - March 30th, 2024 [March 30th, 2024]
- File:Tony Gwynn Hall of Fame exhibit.jpg - Wikipedia - Rethnea.gr - January 24th, 2024 [January 24th, 2024]
- George Washington Masonic Memorial photo honored in Wikipedia photo competition - ALXnow - January 22nd, 2024 [January 22nd, 2024]
- Ruwiki, the Russian Wikipedia to launch on Monday - New York Post - January 22nd, 2024 [January 22nd, 2024]
- In the War for Narratives Iran's Regime Takes to Wikipedia - NCRI - National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI) - January 22nd, 2024 [January 22nd, 2024]
- We need to embrace AI, says Wikipedia's Jimmy Wales - CNBCAfrica.com - January 22nd, 2024 [January 22nd, 2024]
- People are only just realising what the Wiki in Wikipedia actually means - The Mirror - January 22nd, 2024 [January 22nd, 2024]
- Kayla Braxton furious over wrong Wikipedia update, shares reaction - Sportskeeda - December 23rd, 2023 [December 23rd, 2023]
- Chicago Bears offensive coordinator Luke Getsy given hilarious nickname on Wikipedia page - On Tap Sports Net - December 23rd, 2023 [December 23rd, 2023]
- Is Wikipedia struggling to maintain neutrality in times of political unrest? - The Spectator Australia - December 23rd, 2023 [December 23rd, 2023]
- Top 25: Here are the most-read Wikipedia articles of the year - NewsNation Now - December 23rd, 2023 [December 23rd, 2023]
- India's Jawan, Pathaan, IPL among Wikipedia's most read articles; ChatGPT tops the chart! Here's the full list | Mint - Mint - December 23rd, 2023 [December 23rd, 2023]
- Victoria Atkins' Wikipedia page edited after 'doctors in training' remark - indy100 - December 23rd, 2023 [December 23rd, 2023]
- Top 25: Here are the most-read Wikipedia articles of the year - KXAN.com - December 14th, 2023 [December 14th, 2023]
- Wikipedia, wrapped. From ChatGPT to Cricket World Cup, here are 2023's most-viewed articles on the internet's encyclopedia - WPVI-TV - December 14th, 2023 [December 14th, 2023]
- Why Wikipedia's highway editors took the exit ramp. - Slate - December 14th, 2023 [December 14th, 2023]
- Wikipedia, wrapped. From ChatGPT to Cricket World Cup, here are 2023's most-viewed articles on the internet's encyclopedia - KGO-TV - December 14th, 2023 [December 14th, 2023]
- Wikipedia asks: Have you gotten $2.75 worth of info? Consider donating - The Ledger - December 14th, 2023 [December 14th, 2023]
- Dive into the weird and wonderful Depths of Wikipedia - WBUR News - December 14th, 2023 [December 14th, 2023]
- ChatGPT, Taylor Swift: The top 25 most viewed Wikipedia pages of 2023 - USA TODAY - December 14th, 2023 [December 14th, 2023]
- The 25 Most Popular Wikipedia Pages of 2023 - Mentalfloss - December 14th, 2023 [December 14th, 2023]
- ChatGPT is Wikipedia's most-viewed article in 2023 - CoinGeek - December 14th, 2023 [December 14th, 2023]
- These are the most read entries on Wikipedia in 2023: atomic bombs and much more. - Softonic EN - December 14th, 2023 [December 14th, 2023]
- Oppenheimer and Matthew Perry rank as two of the most viewed Wikipedia pages in 2023 - Gamereactor UK - December 14th, 2023 [December 14th, 2023]
- Wikipedias Most-Viewed Articles of 2023 Revealed - Greek Reporter - December 14th, 2023 [December 14th, 2023]
- Watching the Napoleon Movie? Don't Forget to Read His Wikipedia Page. - Slate - November 24th, 2023 [November 24th, 2023]
- Crowdsourced fact-checking fights misinformation in Taiwan ... - Cornell Chronicle - November 24th, 2023 [November 24th, 2023]
- The Sunday Read: 'Wikipedia's Moment of Truth' - The New York Times - September 11th, 2023 [September 11th, 2023]
- 'The more vibrant the society, the more actors seek to influence Wikipedia' - Ynetnews - September 11th, 2023 [September 11th, 2023]
- SOMEONE Keeps Editing Joshua Wright's Wikipedia Page To Downplay The Whole 'Sleeping With 1Ls' Thing - Above the Law - September 11th, 2023 [September 11th, 2023]
- Why Wikipedia is so imperative for public relations - PR Daily - September 11th, 2023 [September 11th, 2023]
- More Wikipedia taunts as Max Verstappen erases a Lewis Hamilton World title - Yahoo Eurosport UK - September 11th, 2023 [September 11th, 2023]
- Local Teacher Becomes First Malaysian To Win Wikimedian Award ... - The Rakyat Post - September 11th, 2023 [September 11th, 2023]
- Wikipedia's Moment of Truth - The New York Times - September 11th, 2023 [September 11th, 2023]
- New Mall-Based Minnesota Kohls Store Coming in 2024 | Joel ... - NewsBreak Original - June 20th, 2023 [June 20th, 2023]
- Open Access Makes Research More Widely Cited, Helping Spread ... - Techdirt - June 20th, 2023 [June 20th, 2023]
- Russia fines Wikipedia owner for failing to delete Azov battalion content - Ifax - Yahoo News - June 7th, 2023 [June 7th, 2023]
- Interviewing Jimmy Wales, Cofounder of Wikipedia - Reason - June 7th, 2023 [June 7th, 2023]
- Purple Speedy Boyfriend Wikipedia: Who Is Purplespeedy Dating? - PKBnews.in - June 7th, 2023 [June 7th, 2023]
- How Conflicts and Population Loss Led to the Rise of English ... - Political Science Now - May 29th, 2023 [May 29th, 2023]
- Research Article: Wikipedia and Open Access (preprint) - LJ INFOdocket - May 29th, 2023 [May 29th, 2023]
- Who Was Kuaron Harvey Cousin Paris Harvey? Wikipedia And Age - PKBnews.in - May 29th, 2023 [May 29th, 2023]
- Opinion | The Impossible Math of the Debt Deal's Detractors - The New York Times - May 29th, 2023 [May 29th, 2023]
- Wikipedia Grapples With Chatbots: Should It Allow Their Use For ... - Techdirt - May 20th, 2023 [May 20th, 2023]
- Stephen Joness deleted rugby 7s article leads to hilarious wikipedia update | RugbyDump - RugbyDump - May 20th, 2023 [May 20th, 2023]
- Bradley Dack is the kind of football hero that cannot be judged on a ... - Football365 - May 20th, 2023 [May 20th, 2023]
- Who is Roxy Horner? Jack Whitehall's Girlfriend Age, Wikipedia And ... - PKBnews.in - May 20th, 2023 [May 20th, 2023]
- The Unspeakable Death of the 'Almighty Dollar' - Resilience - May 20th, 2023 [May 20th, 2023]
- WikiBias: How Wikipedia erases fringe theories and enforces conformity - Minding The Campus - May 2nd, 2023 [May 2nd, 2023]
- Online Safety Bill age checks? We won't do 'em, says Wikipedia - The Register - May 2nd, 2023 [May 2nd, 2023]
- Russian court fines Wikipedia over Ukraine invasion article - Verdict - May 2nd, 2023 [May 2nd, 2023]
- Wikipedia names Howie Roseman 'master of all the draft' - Yardbarker - May 2nd, 2023 [May 2nd, 2023]
- Don't rely on sites like Wikipedia to write verdicts: Madras HC - Times of India - May 2nd, 2023 [May 2nd, 2023]
- Amazon, Bing, Wikipedia make EU's list of 'Very Large' platforms - The Register - May 2nd, 2023 [May 2nd, 2023]
- Who Is Patty Raynes? Net Worth 2023, Wikipedia And Age Details ... - PKBnews.in - May 2nd, 2023 [May 2nd, 2023]
- What After Xi Jinpings Overture to Zelensky? - IDN InDepthNews | Analysis That Matters - May 2nd, 2023 [May 2nd, 2023]
- New study rejects research suggestions that Wikipedia content shapes High Court judgments - The Irish Times - April 19th, 2023 [April 19th, 2023]
- The Wikipedia fight over Poland's role in the Holocaust sparks death threats against an Ottawa professor - The Canadian Jewish News - April 19th, 2023 [April 19th, 2023]
- Who were March's most newsworthy celebrities, according to the ... - KTVZ - April 19th, 2023 [April 19th, 2023]
- Twitter using Wikipedia to decide what is 'government-funded media' - Business Insider - April 13th, 2023 [April 13th, 2023]
- Practical Apps: Wikipedia Looking Smart To Go | Spotlight ... - highcountryshopper.com - April 13th, 2023 [April 13th, 2023]
- Rob Kearney receives Wikipedia edit after Joe Biden's All Blacks blunder - Rugby OnSlaught - April 13th, 2023 [April 13th, 2023]
- Editor's notes: Nut drivers - Bryan County News - April 13th, 2023 [April 13th, 2023]
- Top 5 Kart Games of the 90's - Twin Galaxies - April 13th, 2023 [April 13th, 2023]
- Things to do in the UAE this week: Ramadan shopping festival ... - The National - April 13th, 2023 [April 13th, 2023]
- Wikipedia had the wrong Vatican City flag for years. Now incorrect flags are everywhere - Catholic News Agency - April 11th, 2023 [April 11th, 2023]
- Texas ruling to ban abortion pills nationwide gets basic facts wrong: experts - Business Insider - April 11th, 2023 [April 11th, 2023]
- Hashtag Trending Apr.5th- Wikipedias new logo, $20 billion to revive Intel, Fake ransomware attacks - IT World Canada - April 11th, 2023 [April 11th, 2023]
- ChatGPT and GPT4: Wikipedia 2.0 or a fresh starting point for society? - IT-Online - April 11th, 2023 [April 11th, 2023]
- Letters for April | Letters to the Editor - The Critic - April 11th, 2023 [April 11th, 2023]
- Sprouts Permanently Closing Major California Location at the End of ... - NewsBreak Original - April 11th, 2023 [April 11th, 2023]
- Who owns the Water? The Tragedy of Commons! BigWire - Big Wire, news that matters - April 11th, 2023 [April 11th, 2023]
- Wikipedia's new sound logo had a seriously ambitious design brief - Creative Bloq - April 2nd, 2023 [April 2nd, 2023]
- Will Wikipedia be written by AI? Founder Jimmy Wales is thinking about it - Evening Standard - April 2nd, 2023 [April 2nd, 2023]
- Rodri suffers brutal Wikipedia takedown as Scotland tantrum leaves Spaniard 'crying into his haggis bon bons' - Daily Record - April 2nd, 2023 [April 2nd, 2023]
- This is Wikipedia's new audio logo, which is designed to be 'The Sound of All Human Knowledge' - MusicRadar - April 2nd, 2023 [April 2nd, 2023]