Sen. Cayetano confirms Wikipedia report – Inquirer.net
FACEBOOK/Anne Redford
After my article (Is Sen. Alan Cayetano a PH Citizen?) appeared last week, my Facebook page was immediately besieged by the social media trolls of Sen. Cayetano who labeled my article FAKE NEWS and who went to great pains to disparage and discredit Wikipedia, which for todays online users is what the Encyclopedia Britannica was to researchers in the pre-Internet past.
In his response, Sen. Cayetano personally declared my opinion article to be ahatchet job, defamation and fake news which he claimed got so many things in the article wrong.
What exactly did my article get wrong?
Sen. Cayetanos first correction was: To answer your headline: No I am not an American Citizen; I never chose to be an American Citizen.
Wrong. The headline asked if he was a Philippine citizen, not if he was an American citizen.
It is also a lie that he never chose to be an American citizen. In his Comelec protest action against Cayetano, former Pateros Mayor Jose Capco, Jr, produced documentation from official government records showing that on January 23, 1985, Alan Peter Cayetano personally applied for and obtained an Alien Certificate of Registration (ACR) asserting that he was an American citizen. As Atty. Capco pointed out, the law required Cayetano to personally apply for this ACR and he dutifully complied.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iQo0V_n9agA
SCREENSHOT
What I quoted in my article was Wikipedias report that Alan Peter Cayetano renounced his US citizenship to stand for election to the Philippine House of Representatives in the 1998 elections, and to gain admission to the Philippine Bar that same month.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_former_United_States_citizens_who_relinquished_their_nationality
In his response, Sen. Cayetano confirmed the essential facts provided by Wikipedia: But even without any legal obligation nor necessity, I gave up my American Citizenship because even before I took the Philippine Bar or ran for Congress, I knew I wanted to serve the Filipino People and knew I could only best do that by having no questions to my allegiance.
Sen. Cayetano was elected to the Philippine Congress in May of 1998 and became a member of the Philippine bar that same year. So he claims he gave up his US citizenship before May 1998.
But according to the Federal Register of the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-1999-04-22/html/99-10022.htm), Sen. Cayetanos name appears on the list of individuals losing United States citizenship (within the meaning of section 877(a)) with respect to whom the Secretary received information during the quarter ending March 31, 1999.
Was Sen. Cayetano still officially a US citizen when he ran for the Philippine Congress in 1998 and when he was admitted to the Philippine bar that same year?
While Sen. Cayetano openly acknowledges that he gave up his US citizenship only in either 1998 or 1999, the fact remains that when he ran for and won a seat as a Taguig City Councilor in 1991 and as Taguig City Vice Mayor in 1995, he was still a US citizen, by his own admission.
This is a significant issue for former Mayor Rommel Arnado who reacquired his status as a Philippine citizen in July 2008 and then renounced his American citizenship in April 2009 before running for mayor of his hometown of Kauswagan, Lanao in 2010. After winning the 2010 election, Arnado won reelection by a landslide in 2013.
After evidence was presented that Mayor Arnado used his US passport after he had renounced his US citizenship, the Comelec disqualified him, which Arnado appealed. In an 8-4 vote on August 18, 2015, the Philippine Supreme Court upheld the Comelecs disqualification of Arnado in a decision that has now become part of the body of jurisprudence on the question of the qualification of candidates who once held foreign citizenship (http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/723478/sc-ousts-american-mayor-of-lanao-town).
SCREENSHOT
Only natural-born Filipinos who owe total and undivided allegiance to the Republic of the Philippines could run for and hold elective public office, read the Supreme Court decision.
In his defense, Sen. Cayetano cited the Comelecs decision in Capcos disqualification case against him. On April 19, 2007, Comelec Chairman Benjamin Abalos told reporters that the Comelec had junked Capcos disqualification case against Cayetano, finding that Cayetano is natural-born Filipino citizen because he was born in the Philippines with a Filipino father and an American mother.
Is Sen. Cayetano a natural born Filipino citizen?
The provision on Philippine citizenship is found in Article IV of the 1987 Philippine Constitution. Section 1 states the following are citizens of the Philippines including:
[3] Those born before January 17, 1973, of Filipino mothers, who elect Philippine citizenship upon reaching the age of majority.
If we accept a sexist interpretation of the law that this provision applies only to those with Filipino mothers and not those with Filipino fathers like Sen. Cayetano, then that would be his defense.
But if the law is gender-neutral and does not discriminate between Filipino mothers and fathers, then this section would apply to Sen. Cayetano who was born in 1970 and who elected US citizenship in 1985 when he applied for and obtained his Alien Certificate of Registration as a US citizen.
Article IV Section 2 of the 1987 Philippine Constitution states that: Natural-born citizens are those who are citizens of the Philippines from birth without having to perform any act to acquire or perfect their Philippine citizenship. Those who elect Philippine citizenship in accordance with paragraph (3), Section 1 hereof shall be deemed natural-born citizens.
Sen. Cayetano did not elect Philippine citizenship in 1985 when he obtained his ACR as a US citizen. The Comelecs 2007 decision is useless because Chairman Abalos was satisfied to just examine Cayetanos birth certificate to rule with finality that Cayetano is a natural born Filipino citizen.
There are dozens of Filipino Americans in San Francisco who have applied for a Philippine passport based on the fact that they were born in the Philippines of an American father and a Filipino mother but who left the Philippines with a US passport before they reached 21. Their applications for dual citizenship were denied by the Philippine Consulate because they were deemed not to have elected Philippine citizenship upon reaching the age of majority
Cayetano and Duterte. FACEBOOK/Alan Cayetano
In his response to my opinion piece, Sen. Cayetano presents himself as a poor victim who has been unfairly picked on even though, he declares, I have dedicated my life, risked my life and sacrificed much for the Philippines. It is my duty and honor to do so.
Sometimes, when someone is so full of himself, it is tempting to ask exactly how he risked his life and how much he sacrificed for his country.
In one TV interview shown on The Filipino Channel (TFC) a few years ago, I recall watching Sen. Cayetano proudly show off his prized collection of Michael Jordan and Kobe Bryant collectibles. If someone offered him $200,000 for them, he would likely reject the offer as way below their fair market value. After all, he sacrificed so much time collecting them that it just would be too much to ask him to part with them.
Perhaps Sen. Cayetano can also explain how much he risked his life to contribute P71.3 million pesos ($1.42 M) to the 2016 presidential campaign of Rodrigo Duterte, which is three times higher than his P23.6 million declared net worth in 2015. (Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism report 12/08/2016).
Sen. Cayetano also pointed out that the basic principle of both journalism and due process is to give the accused a chance to answer. I am certain that the 8,000+ victims of the extrajudicial killings of the Duterte government he supports would have welcomed due process and the chance to answer the charge of being drug addicts before being sentenced to death.
Sen. Cayetano attacked the INQUIRER for presenting One sided news with malicious views. But this is not fair to the INQUIRER because the day after my article appeared, another INQUIRER columnist, Oscar Franklin Tan, wrote his opinion on the matter (Yasay and Cayetano citizenship different) stating that the law I cited did not exist.
Let us be clear that the basic facts I presented in my commentary are not in dispute. By his own admission, Sen. Cayetano was a US citizen from birth until he relinquished his US citizenship in either 1998 or 1999. Except for the precise date when Cayetano officially relinquished his US citizenship, the essential facts are not disputed. It is the legal interpretation of the law that Oscar Franklin Tan questions.
This deserves a serious discussion. If I am wrong, then dozens of Filipino Americans in San Francisco, and perhaps thousands all over the world, deserve to have their applications for dual citizenship approved because there is no legal requirement that dual citizens must elect Philippine citizenship upon reaching the age of majority to be considered natural born Filipinos as Article IV of the Philippine Constitution requires.
If I am right, then Sen. Cayetano should immediately resign his post.
Below is Sen. Cayetanos unedited response to my article as published in his Facebook page:
Balanced News, Fearless Views or One-Sided News, Malicious Views!
Thank You, Inquirer.net, for a well disguised malicious article.
First of all, the basic principle of both journalism and due process is to give the accused a chance to answer.
Because you neither called me nor asked anyone in my office or just because this was simply a hatchet job -you got so many things in the article wrong.
To answer your headline:
No I am not an American Citizen; I never chose to be an American Citizen.
I am a Filipino and my only nationality is Filipino.
It is NOT true that it is not known what happened with the case filed by former Mayor Capco. A simple check with the Comelec would show that Comelec decided, with finality, that I am a Natural Born Filipino and qualified to run for and hold public office.
The ruling stated that consistent with the Constitution and jurisprudence from the Supreme Court 1) Unlike the other cases you mentioned in the malicious article, my case is different (basic law states that different facts lead to a different conclusion) that I was born a dual Citizen having an American mother and a Filipino father; and (2) that one may be a Natural Born citizen of both countries.
But even without any legal obligation nor necessity, I gave up my American Citizenship because even before I took the Philippine Bar or ran for Congress, I knew I wanted to serve the Filipino People and knew I could only best do that by having no questions to my allegiance the Philippine Constitution allows dual citizenship but detests dual allegiance; that is why we also passed a dual citizenship law for Filipinos living abroad.
I am not stateless because unlike others who were Filipino then gave up Filipino citizenship for foreign citizenship therefore losing their Filipino citizenship, I always had both, BUT gave up the foreign citizenship. Again, I never chose to be a U.S. Citizen; the reverse is true I renounced it.
Your research dug up an old case and even a video but you couldnt send me a text or an email, or give me a call to refute your allegations, or you couldnt even get the result of the Comelec case.
Like many Filipinos, I love the Philippines and love America and its people, but my allegiance and loyalty is and will always be with the Philippines and the Filipino people.
I have dedicated my life, risked my life and sacrificed much for the Philippines. It is my duty and honor to do so.
In the process, I have argued and have gone head on against some of the most powerful people in the country.
At this stage of my public service, I have fully supported President Dutertes quadruple war on poverty, crime, drugs and corruption. I have also fully supported his independent foreign policy, thus getting the ire of some in the U.S., ABS CBN, some in the Philippine Daily Inquirer and some in Rappler, some human rights advocates, and of course, the anti-Duterte forces.
That is a small price for me to pay for supporting the President and building a nation.
How about you, Inquirer? Your slogan is balanced news, fearless views?
At what price did you give that up? One sided news with malicious views
Let me challenge you. If Im not Filipino, if Im still a U.S. citizen or stateless, Ill resign, not run for or accept appointment to public office. But if I am Filipino, you close down your newspaper. Or at least learn to get the other side before you publish!
May GOD Bless you despite our differences.
May GOD Bless The Philippines!
(Send comments to Rodislawyer@gmail.com or mail them to the Law Offices of Rodel Rodis at 2429 Ocean Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94127.)
Link:
Sen. Cayetano confirms Wikipedia report - Inquirer.net
- AI is eating leftist garbage from Wikipedia and YOU consume what comes out - New York Post - July 24th, 2025 [July 24th, 2025]
- Wikipedia threatens to limit UK access to website - The Telegraph - July 24th, 2025 [July 24th, 2025]
- Pirate Software's Game Heartbound is Under Attack on Steam and Wikipedia - Sports Illustrated - July 24th, 2025 [July 24th, 2025]
- Like Wikipedia, Mastodon now shows a top banner urging you to donate to keep it alive - Neowin - July 24th, 2025 [July 24th, 2025]
- Five members of 11KBW in Wikipedia Online Safety Act challenge - 11KBW - July 24th, 2025 [July 24th, 2025]
- Wiki-Quantities and Wiki-Measurements: Datasets of quantities and their measurement context from Wikipedia - Nature - July 22nd, 2025 [July 22nd, 2025]
- UK online legislation threat to operations,Wikipedia to argue in court - Euronews.com - July 22nd, 2025 [July 22nd, 2025]
- Exclusive | Why Mary-Louise Parker refuses to look at her Wikipedia page: Its bad - Page Six - July 14th, 2025 [July 14th, 2025]
- Opinion: How Wikipedia became one of the greatest inventions of the modern age - The Globe and Mail - July 12th, 2025 [July 12th, 2025]
- The Last of Us Part 2 has a 'chronological mode' now, in case you wanted to play through a story with all the finesse of a Wikipedia plot summary - PC... - July 10th, 2025 [July 10th, 2025]
- Many Wikipedia Articles Are Outdated or Incorrect - Yahoo - July 8th, 2025 [July 8th, 2025]
- Wikipedia Vs. Epistemic Insecurity: Why the World's Most Trusted Website Still Matters 06/30/2025 - MediaPost - July 2nd, 2025 [July 2nd, 2025]
- Mark O'Connell: I love Wikipedia so much, I hardly even minded when it killed me off - The Irish Times - June 29th, 2025 [June 29th, 2025]
- History of Wikipedia - Australian Broadcasting Corporation - June 28th, 2025 [June 28th, 2025]
- 60 Times Wikipedia Articles Were So Scary And Unsettling People Just Had To Know More - Bored Panda - June 24th, 2025 [June 24th, 2025]
- 60 Times Wikipedia Articles Were So Scary And Unsettling People Just Had To Know More - inkl - June 24th, 2025 [June 24th, 2025]
- Wikipedia Is The Latest Place To Join The Daily Gaming Craze - Kotaku - June 22nd, 2025 [June 22nd, 2025]
- Wikipedia Did What No One Expected: This Open Platform Just Proved Its Possible to Fight Back Against Powerful AI Systems - Rude Baguette - June 22nd, 2025 [June 22nd, 2025]
- Terrifying Survey Claims ChatGPT Has Overtaken Wikipedia - futurism.com - May 24th, 2025 [May 24th, 2025]
- Wikipedia wants you to wear your love for an open internet on your sleeve - Fast Company - May 24th, 2025 [May 24th, 2025]
- Wikipedia knew first? What really happened after Portnovs killing in Madrid - Euro Weekly News - May 24th, 2025 [May 24th, 2025]
- Can Wikipedia survive the rise of AI and the age of Donald Trump? - Australian Broadcasting Corporation - May 11th, 2025 [May 11th, 2025]
- Wikipedia fights the UKs flawed and burdensome online safety rules - The Verge - May 10th, 2025 [May 10th, 2025]
- Not courts duty to tell media to delete this and take that down: SC sets aside Delhi HCs order to take down page on ANI vs Wikipedia case - The Indian... - May 10th, 2025 [May 10th, 2025]
- Propaganda tool row: SC reverses Wikipedia takedown in ANI defamation case - Siasat.com - May 10th, 2025 [May 10th, 2025]
- Wikipedia is using (some) generative AI now - The Verge - May 8th, 2025 [May 8th, 2025]
- Jay-Z Accuses Attorney Of Wikipedia Manipulation In Legal Battle - Evrim Aac - May 8th, 2025 [May 8th, 2025]
- US jurist accuses Wikipedia of disseminating propaganda and rewriting history - MSN - May 8th, 2025 [May 8th, 2025]
- Wikipedia Foundation Withdraws Appeal Before Delhi High Court Following Supreme Court Ruling - The Law Advice - May 8th, 2025 [May 8th, 2025]
- Generative AI will help Wikipedia editors moderate, translate, and onboard newcomers - the-decoder.com - May 8th, 2025 [May 8th, 2025]
- Wikipedia will apply generative AI to support editors and reduce technical barriers - The Weekly Journal - May 8th, 2025 [May 8th, 2025]
- Wikipedia turns to generative AI to support its volunteer community - TechSpot - May 8th, 2025 [May 8th, 2025]
- How is Wikipedia Progressive in the Age of AI? - Analytics Insight - May 8th, 2025 [May 8th, 2025]
- Members of Congress call on Wikipedia to curb its antisemitism - Israel National News - May 8th, 2025 [May 8th, 2025]
- Is Wikipedia in trouble? - London Evening Standard - April 12th, 2025 [April 12th, 2025]
- Wikipedia Has an Alter Ego Thats Obsessed With Questions. Everyone Should Browse It. - Slate - April 12th, 2025 [April 12th, 2025]
- ANI vs Wikipedia: What the case is about and what has happened so far - Business Standard - April 12th, 2025 [April 12th, 2025]
- Delhi HC refuses to stay order asking Wikipedia to remove alleged defamatory description of ANI - The Economic Times - April 10th, 2025 [April 10th, 2025]
- The ADL says Wikipedia contains antisemitic bias, amid dispute over how the Israel-Hamas conflict is represented on the site - CNN - March 22nd, 2025 [March 22nd, 2025]
- I Tried a TikTok-Style Version of Wikipedia, and It's Now My Favorite Way of Learning - MUO - MakeUseOf - March 22nd, 2025 [March 22nd, 2025]
- How obscure is prospective Celtics buyer William Chisholm? He didnt have a Wikipedia page until Thursday. - The Boston Globe - March 22nd, 2025 [March 22nd, 2025]
- How biased Wikipedia trashed Trumps nominees after he named them - New York Post - March 22nd, 2025 [March 22nd, 2025]
- Deconstructing Wikipedia: Its biased, lopsided and partisan - The Sunday Guardian - March 22nd, 2025 [March 22nd, 2025]
- ADL report finds clear evidence of anti-Israel bias among Wikipedia editors - JNS.org - March 22nd, 2025 [March 22nd, 2025]
- ADL: Anti-Israel Wikipedia editors colluding in anti-Israel bias on site - The Times of Israel - March 22nd, 2025 [March 22nd, 2025]
- What happens when Wikipedia, Joe Biden, and Ms. Frizzle walk into a reality show? - Queen's Journal - March 22nd, 2025 [March 22nd, 2025]
- Wikipedia posts updated to smear Patel, Hegseth, Gabbard: Watchdog - Washington Examiner - March 22nd, 2025 [March 22nd, 2025]
- John Oliver Marvels at Wikipedia Page of Mel Gibson's Father: Somehow Your Son 'Is Not the Worst Thing About You' - TheWrap - March 22nd, 2025 [March 22nd, 2025]
- Wikipedia disrupted by edit wars to manipulate pages on war in Gaza with at least 14 editors banned: report - New York Post - March 13th, 2025 [March 13th, 2025]
- Volunteer photographers are fixing Wikipedia's terrible celebrity headshots - Engadget - March 13th, 2025 [March 13th, 2025]
- Photographers Are on a Mission to Fix Wikipedia's Famously Bad Celebrity Portraits - 404 Media - March 13th, 2025 [March 13th, 2025]
- Wikipedia roiled with internal strife over page edits about the Middle East - Detroit News - March 13th, 2025 [March 13th, 2025]
- Wikipedia has a huge gender equality problem heres why it matters - The Conversation Indonesia - March 13th, 2025 [March 13th, 2025]
- Wikipedia Co-founder: It's Not Neutral, Needs to Be Investigated - Newsmax - March 13th, 2025 [March 13th, 2025]
- Volunteer Photographers Tackle Terrible Celeb Headshots on Wikipedia - PCMag UK - March 13th, 2025 [March 13th, 2025]
- Bored? Check out the Museum of All Things and dive into Wikipedia in 3D - GamingOnLinux - March 3rd, 2025 [March 3rd, 2025]
- This free interactive museum lets you explore Wikipedia like never before - Digital Trends - March 3rd, 2025 [March 3rd, 2025]
- The Wild World of Wikipedia Speedrunning - LAFM - March 3rd, 2025 [March 3rd, 2025]
- Wikipedia co-founder's open challenge to Musk: Which US govt branches 'paid to edit, monitor, update, lobby' the website? - Business Today - March 3rd, 2025 [March 3rd, 2025]
- Wikipedia co-founder may just have agreed with Elon Musk in his first viral post in a few years - The Times of India - February 27th, 2025 [February 27th, 2025]
- Elon Musk wants to change the name of Wikipedia $1 billion on the table to achieve it - Unin Rayo - February 27th, 2025 [February 27th, 2025]
- Wikipedia is now an endless 3D museum, and admission is free - Rock Paper Shotgun - February 27th, 2025 [February 27th, 2025]
- This slick new service puts ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Wikipedia on the map - Fast Company - February 27th, 2025 [February 27th, 2025]
- From agnostic to believer: Wikipedia co-founder publicly shares his testimony - CHVN Radio - February 27th, 2025 [February 27th, 2025]
- Wikipedia co-founder's request to Donald Trump and Elon Musk to probe the dubious website - OpIndia - February 27th, 2025 [February 27th, 2025]
- User booked for adding content on Chhatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj on Wikipedia - The Times of India - February 27th, 2025 [February 27th, 2025]
- Remove derogatory and objectionable reference from Wikipedia about Sambhaji Maharaj: Fadnavis - Deccan Herald - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- 'There's limit to free speech': Fadnavis orders action against Wikipedia content - The Times of India - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- Why these scientists devote time to editing and updating Wikipedia - Nature.com - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- Elon Musk's 'reminder' to Wikipedia: $1 billion offer for name change to ... still stands; come on, do .. - The Times of India - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- Maharashtra CM directs cyber police to get objectionable content on Sambhaji Maharaj removed from Wikipedia - The Indian Express - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- Elon Musk and Wikipedia are feuding - The Week - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- Wikipedia UnReliable Sources: Case Study How Wikipedia is Rigged to Prevent Balance When It Comes to Religious Articles - World Religion News - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- Behind the Blog: Backdoors and the Miracle of Wikipedia - 404 Media - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- What if TikTok and Wikipedia had a baby? - The Washington Post - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- How Wikipedia Co-Founder Found Faith After 35 Years as a Nonbeliever - Movieguide - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- Wikipedia, Are You Ready? Musk's $1 Billion Name Change Offer Still On - Analytics Insight - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- Remove objectional reference about Sambhaji Maharaj from Wikipedia: Fadnavis - The Hindu - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- Zee 24 TAAS forces Wikipedia to take action on false content about Chhatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj - MediaNews4U - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- Elon Musks $1 Billion Wikipedia Challenge: Reality or Stunt? - The Octant - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]