New study rejects research suggestions that Wikipedia content shapes High Court judgments – The Irish Times
A new study rejecting research suggestions that Wikipedia content shapes the judgments of Irish High Court judges has been welcomed by the President of the High Court.
Mr Justice David Barniville said those with practical knowledge of judicial decision-making will know that the claim that judges rely on Wikipedia in preparing their judgments in any material way is plainly wrong.
I welcome this detailed analysis which confirms that such claims are wholly inaccurate.
However, Dr Brian Flanagan, the lead author of the disputed research said it was robust and he rejected the claim that his methodology was flawed.
High Court judges in Ireland have repeatedly maintained that submissions from lawyers, not internet searches by judges or their assistants, primarily drive citations in judgments.
Mr Justice David Barniville. Photograph: Dara Mac Dnaill
Compiled by a High Court judge, Mr Justice Richard Humphreys, and a team of serving and former judicial assistants, the new study disputes findings of research by academics at Maynooth University (MU) and two US third level institutions.
The original research paper, published last summer, arose after researchers arranged for 150 new Wikipedia legal articles on Irish Supreme Court decisions to be written by law students. Half were placed online and the rest were kept offline and treated as the control group.
The researchers looked at two measures whether the cases on Wikipedia were more likely to be cited as precedents by subsequent judicial decisions, and whether the argumentation in court judgments echoed the linguistic content of the new Wikipedia pages.
Their key finding was that getting a Wikipedia article increased a cases citations by more than 20 per cent.
When an amended version of the paper was published earlier this year, Dr Flanagan, associate professor of the school of law and criminology at MU and lead author of the research, rejected Mr Justice Humphreys assertion of a watering down of its main findings.
In a press release on Tuesday announcing the new study, Mr Justice Humphreys said there were fundamental problems with the original research paper which render its conclusions unreliable.
[Wikipedia articles 20% more likely to influence legal reasoning of Irish judges, scientists find]
Those problems lay both with a flawed experiment and with flawed speculation, which seemed to derive from a simple lack of knowledge regarding the practical process of judgment production, as to the meaning of the results.
He did not at all believe there was bad faith by the original authors but it was important that public trust in our legal system is not undermined by poor research, he said.
The new study, he outlined, compared citations of cases over a two-year period before Wikipedia articles were created with a two-year period thereafter.
That showed citations in judgments changed by exactly the same amount in respect of cases where articles had been created on Wikipedia as applied where no articles had been created, he said.
The evidence supports the conclusion that there is simply no Wikipedia effect whatsoever.
The study tracked the origin of case citations in a representative group of judgments, and found a large majority of citations arose from written or oral submissions, or materials referred to in such submissions. In virtually all the judgments studied, there was objective evidence for a source of the case citation which had nothing to do with Wikipedia.
[Judges and academics in fresh row over research claiming Wikipedia used for judgments]
The study sets out a detailed critique of the original paper, including concerning the use of distant historic citations which is alleged to undermine its reliability. It describes as problematic the use of a commercial website to obtain citation information rather than the official courts site. The methodology implied by the published data implies it was originally intended to consult the official website but no data on this has been published, it states.
Claims that the conclusions in the original paper had not changed were described as lacking credibility.
The study claims the original papers speculations are exaggerated and not supported by the evidence and that its conclusions are inappropriately moralising.
In a statement reacting to the Humphreys study, Dr Flanagan disputed the methodology used in the research was flawed.
He said the study claims the research methodology was flawed in two respects in particular that commercial data was used instead of the courts own records and that too long a period of citations before the Wikipedia articles was used and that this determined the results.
In fact, our analysis is robust to both these critiques, he said. The commercial data used for the analysis was cross-checked against the courts own records and the researchers found only small differences that didnt change our conclusions.
From the analysis, it was plain to see the treatment (Wikipedia) articles jump in citations immediately after being added to Wikipedia, and this jump is notably different to any period in the two years beforehand, he said.
While we disagree with these headline points from this paper, we also understand that the authors have gathered additional data on the citation context from judgments and we welcome that discussion, Dr Flanagan said.
A summary version of the Humphreys paper was published on Tuesday in the Irish Law Times and the full paper has been submitted, by invitation, to the Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Jurisprudence. The full paper is available online at papers.ssrn.com as is the research paper.
- Made J. Cole look like he died in the war: Drake vs Kendrick Lamar Rap Battle Gets a World War 2 Styled Wikipedia ... - FandomWire - May 7th, 2024 [May 7th, 2024]
- Five Jokes from the First Season of The Simpsons You Now Need Wikipedia to Understand - Cracked.com - May 7th, 2024 [May 7th, 2024]
- Mastodon Play 'Wikipedia: Fact or Fiction?' - Loudwire - March 30th, 2024 [March 30th, 2024]
- Wolff contacted Verstappen to explain Wikipedia statement - GPblog - March 30th, 2024 [March 30th, 2024]
- Tulu Wikipedia more than doubles in size in seven years - The Hindu - March 30th, 2024 [March 30th, 2024]
- File:Tony Gwynn Hall of Fame exhibit.jpg - Wikipedia - Rethnea.gr - January 24th, 2024 [January 24th, 2024]
- George Washington Masonic Memorial photo honored in Wikipedia photo competition - ALXnow - January 22nd, 2024 [January 22nd, 2024]
- Ruwiki, the Russian Wikipedia to launch on Monday - New York Post - January 22nd, 2024 [January 22nd, 2024]
- In the War for Narratives Iran's Regime Takes to Wikipedia - NCRI - National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI) - January 22nd, 2024 [January 22nd, 2024]
- We need to embrace AI, says Wikipedia's Jimmy Wales - CNBCAfrica.com - January 22nd, 2024 [January 22nd, 2024]
- People are only just realising what the Wiki in Wikipedia actually means - The Mirror - January 22nd, 2024 [January 22nd, 2024]
- Kayla Braxton furious over wrong Wikipedia update, shares reaction - Sportskeeda - December 23rd, 2023 [December 23rd, 2023]
- Chicago Bears offensive coordinator Luke Getsy given hilarious nickname on Wikipedia page - On Tap Sports Net - December 23rd, 2023 [December 23rd, 2023]
- Is Wikipedia struggling to maintain neutrality in times of political unrest? - The Spectator Australia - December 23rd, 2023 [December 23rd, 2023]
- Top 25: Here are the most-read Wikipedia articles of the year - NewsNation Now - December 23rd, 2023 [December 23rd, 2023]
- India's Jawan, Pathaan, IPL among Wikipedia's most read articles; ChatGPT tops the chart! Here's the full list | Mint - Mint - December 23rd, 2023 [December 23rd, 2023]
- Victoria Atkins' Wikipedia page edited after 'doctors in training' remark - indy100 - December 23rd, 2023 [December 23rd, 2023]
- Top 25: Here are the most-read Wikipedia articles of the year - KXAN.com - December 14th, 2023 [December 14th, 2023]
- Wikipedia, wrapped. From ChatGPT to Cricket World Cup, here are 2023's most-viewed articles on the internet's encyclopedia - WPVI-TV - December 14th, 2023 [December 14th, 2023]
- Why Wikipedia's highway editors took the exit ramp. - Slate - December 14th, 2023 [December 14th, 2023]
- Wikipedia, wrapped. From ChatGPT to Cricket World Cup, here are 2023's most-viewed articles on the internet's encyclopedia - KGO-TV - December 14th, 2023 [December 14th, 2023]
- Wikipedia asks: Have you gotten $2.75 worth of info? Consider donating - The Ledger - December 14th, 2023 [December 14th, 2023]
- Dive into the weird and wonderful Depths of Wikipedia - WBUR News - December 14th, 2023 [December 14th, 2023]
- ChatGPT, Taylor Swift: The top 25 most viewed Wikipedia pages of 2023 - USA TODAY - December 14th, 2023 [December 14th, 2023]
- The 25 Most Popular Wikipedia Pages of 2023 - Mentalfloss - December 14th, 2023 [December 14th, 2023]
- ChatGPT is Wikipedia's most-viewed article in 2023 - CoinGeek - December 14th, 2023 [December 14th, 2023]
- These are the most read entries on Wikipedia in 2023: atomic bombs and much more. - Softonic EN - December 14th, 2023 [December 14th, 2023]
- Oppenheimer and Matthew Perry rank as two of the most viewed Wikipedia pages in 2023 - Gamereactor UK - December 14th, 2023 [December 14th, 2023]
- Wikipedias Most-Viewed Articles of 2023 Revealed - Greek Reporter - December 14th, 2023 [December 14th, 2023]
- Watching the Napoleon Movie? Don't Forget to Read His Wikipedia Page. - Slate - November 24th, 2023 [November 24th, 2023]
- Crowdsourced fact-checking fights misinformation in Taiwan ... - Cornell Chronicle - November 24th, 2023 [November 24th, 2023]
- The Sunday Read: 'Wikipedia's Moment of Truth' - The New York Times - September 11th, 2023 [September 11th, 2023]
- 'The more vibrant the society, the more actors seek to influence Wikipedia' - Ynetnews - September 11th, 2023 [September 11th, 2023]
- SOMEONE Keeps Editing Joshua Wright's Wikipedia Page To Downplay The Whole 'Sleeping With 1Ls' Thing - Above the Law - September 11th, 2023 [September 11th, 2023]
- Why Wikipedia is so imperative for public relations - PR Daily - September 11th, 2023 [September 11th, 2023]
- More Wikipedia taunts as Max Verstappen erases a Lewis Hamilton World title - Yahoo Eurosport UK - September 11th, 2023 [September 11th, 2023]
- Local Teacher Becomes First Malaysian To Win Wikimedian Award ... - The Rakyat Post - September 11th, 2023 [September 11th, 2023]
- Wikipedia's Moment of Truth - The New York Times - September 11th, 2023 [September 11th, 2023]
- The shocking truth about Wikipedias Holocaust disinformation - Forward - June 20th, 2023 [June 20th, 2023]
- New Mall-Based Minnesota Kohls Store Coming in 2024 | Joel ... - NewsBreak Original - June 20th, 2023 [June 20th, 2023]
- Open Access Makes Research More Widely Cited, Helping Spread ... - Techdirt - June 20th, 2023 [June 20th, 2023]
- Russia fines Wikipedia owner for failing to delete Azov battalion content - Ifax - Yahoo News - June 7th, 2023 [June 7th, 2023]
- Interviewing Jimmy Wales, Cofounder of Wikipedia - Reason - June 7th, 2023 [June 7th, 2023]
- Purple Speedy Boyfriend Wikipedia: Who Is Purplespeedy Dating? - PKBnews.in - June 7th, 2023 [June 7th, 2023]
- How Conflicts and Population Loss Led to the Rise of English ... - Political Science Now - May 29th, 2023 [May 29th, 2023]
- Research Article: Wikipedia and Open Access (preprint) - LJ INFOdocket - May 29th, 2023 [May 29th, 2023]
- Who Was Kuaron Harvey Cousin Paris Harvey? Wikipedia And Age - PKBnews.in - May 29th, 2023 [May 29th, 2023]
- Opinion | The Impossible Math of the Debt Deal's Detractors - The New York Times - May 29th, 2023 [May 29th, 2023]
- Wikipedia Grapples With Chatbots: Should It Allow Their Use For ... - Techdirt - May 20th, 2023 [May 20th, 2023]
- Stephen Joness deleted rugby 7s article leads to hilarious wikipedia update | RugbyDump - RugbyDump - May 20th, 2023 [May 20th, 2023]
- Bradley Dack is the kind of football hero that cannot be judged on a ... - Football365 - May 20th, 2023 [May 20th, 2023]
- Who is Roxy Horner? Jack Whitehall's Girlfriend Age, Wikipedia And ... - PKBnews.in - May 20th, 2023 [May 20th, 2023]
- The Unspeakable Death of the 'Almighty Dollar' - Resilience - May 20th, 2023 [May 20th, 2023]
- WikiBias: How Wikipedia erases fringe theories and enforces conformity - Minding The Campus - May 2nd, 2023 [May 2nd, 2023]
- Online Safety Bill age checks? We won't do 'em, says Wikipedia - The Register - May 2nd, 2023 [May 2nd, 2023]
- Russian court fines Wikipedia over Ukraine invasion article - Verdict - May 2nd, 2023 [May 2nd, 2023]
- Wikipedia names Howie Roseman 'master of all the draft' - Yardbarker - May 2nd, 2023 [May 2nd, 2023]
- Don't rely on sites like Wikipedia to write verdicts: Madras HC - Times of India - May 2nd, 2023 [May 2nd, 2023]
- Amazon, Bing, Wikipedia make EU's list of 'Very Large' platforms - The Register - May 2nd, 2023 [May 2nd, 2023]
- Who Is Patty Raynes? Net Worth 2023, Wikipedia And Age Details ... - PKBnews.in - May 2nd, 2023 [May 2nd, 2023]
- What After Xi Jinpings Overture to Zelensky? - IDN InDepthNews | Analysis That Matters - May 2nd, 2023 [May 2nd, 2023]
- The Wikipedia fight over Poland's role in the Holocaust sparks death threats against an Ottawa professor - The Canadian Jewish News - April 19th, 2023 [April 19th, 2023]
- Who were March's most newsworthy celebrities, according to the ... - KTVZ - April 19th, 2023 [April 19th, 2023]
- Twitter using Wikipedia to decide what is 'government-funded media' - Business Insider - April 13th, 2023 [April 13th, 2023]
- Practical Apps: Wikipedia Looking Smart To Go | Spotlight ... - highcountryshopper.com - April 13th, 2023 [April 13th, 2023]
- Rob Kearney receives Wikipedia edit after Joe Biden's All Blacks blunder - Rugby OnSlaught - April 13th, 2023 [April 13th, 2023]
- Editor's notes: Nut drivers - Bryan County News - April 13th, 2023 [April 13th, 2023]
- Top 5 Kart Games of the 90's - Twin Galaxies - April 13th, 2023 [April 13th, 2023]
- Things to do in the UAE this week: Ramadan shopping festival ... - The National - April 13th, 2023 [April 13th, 2023]
- Wikipedia had the wrong Vatican City flag for years. Now incorrect flags are everywhere - Catholic News Agency - April 11th, 2023 [April 11th, 2023]
- Texas ruling to ban abortion pills nationwide gets basic facts wrong: experts - Business Insider - April 11th, 2023 [April 11th, 2023]
- Hashtag Trending Apr.5th- Wikipedias new logo, $20 billion to revive Intel, Fake ransomware attacks - IT World Canada - April 11th, 2023 [April 11th, 2023]
- ChatGPT and GPT4: Wikipedia 2.0 or a fresh starting point for society? - IT-Online - April 11th, 2023 [April 11th, 2023]
- Letters for April | Letters to the Editor - The Critic - April 11th, 2023 [April 11th, 2023]
- Sprouts Permanently Closing Major California Location at the End of ... - NewsBreak Original - April 11th, 2023 [April 11th, 2023]
- Who owns the Water? The Tragedy of Commons! BigWire - Big Wire, news that matters - April 11th, 2023 [April 11th, 2023]
- Wikipedia's new sound logo had a seriously ambitious design brief - Creative Bloq - April 2nd, 2023 [April 2nd, 2023]
- Will Wikipedia be written by AI? Founder Jimmy Wales is thinking about it - Evening Standard - April 2nd, 2023 [April 2nd, 2023]
- Rodri suffers brutal Wikipedia takedown as Scotland tantrum leaves Spaniard 'crying into his haggis bon bons' - Daily Record - April 2nd, 2023 [April 2nd, 2023]
- This is Wikipedia's new audio logo, which is designed to be 'The Sound of All Human Knowledge' - MusicRadar - April 2nd, 2023 [April 2nd, 2023]