Meta Is Building an AI to Fact-Check WikipediaAll 6.5 Million Articles – Singularity Hub
Most people older than 30 probably remember doing research with good old-fashioned encyclopedias. Youd pull a heavy volume from the shelf, check the index for your topic of interest, then flip to the appropriate page and start reading. It wasnt as easy as typing a few words into the Google search bar, but on the plus side, you knew that the information you found in the pages of the Britannica or the World Book was accurate and true.
Not so with internet research today. The overwhelming multitude of sources was confusing enough, but add the proliferation of misinformation and its a wonder any of us believe a word we read online.
Wikipedia is a case in point. As of early 2020, the sites English version was averaging about 255 million page views per day, making it the eighth-most-visited website on the internet. As of last month, it had moved up to spot number seven, and the English version currently has over 6.5 million articles.
But as high-traffic as this go-to information source may be, its accuracy leaves something to be desired; the page about the sites own reliability states, The online encyclopedia does not consider itself to be reliable as a source and discourages readers from using it in academic or research settings.
Metaof the former Facebookwants to change this. In a blog post published last month, the companys employees describe how AI could help make Wikipedia more accurate.
Though tens of thousands of people participate in editing the site, the facts they add arent necessarily correct; even when citations are present, theyre not always accurate nor even relevant.
Meta is developing a machine learning model that scans these citations and cross-references their content to Wikipedia articles to verify that not only the topics line up, but specific figures cited are accurate.
This isnt just a matter of picking out numbers and making sure they match; Metas AI will need to understand the content of cited sources (though understand is a misnomer, as complexity theory researcher Melanie Mitchell would tell you, because AI is still in the narrow phase, meaning its a tool for highly sophisticated pattern recognition, while understanding is a word used for human cognition, which is still a very different thing).
Metas model will understand content not by comparing text strings and making sure they contain the same words, but by comparing mathematical representations of blocks of text, which it arrives at using natural language understanding (NLU) techniques.
What we have done is to build an index of all these web pages by chunking them into passages and providing an accurate representation for each passage, Fabio Petroni, Metas Fundamental AI Research tech lead manager, told Digital Trends. That is not representing word-by-word the passage, but the meaning of the passage. That means that two chunks of text with similar meanings will be represented in a very close position in the resulting n-dimensional space where all these passages are stored.
The AI is being trained on a set of four million Wikipedia citations, and besides picking out faulty citations on the site, its creators would like it to eventually be able to suggest accurate sources to take their place, pulling from a massive index of data thats continuously updating.
One big issue left to work out is working in a grading system for sources reliability. A paper from a scientific journal, for example, would receive a higher grade than a blog post. The amount of content online is so vast and varied that you can find sources to support just about any claim, but parsing the misinformation from the disinformation (the former means incorrect, while the latter means deliberately deceiving), and the peer-reviewed from the non-peer-reviewed, the fact-checked from the hastily-slapped-together, is no small taskbut a very important one when it comes to trust.
Meta has open-sourced its model, and those who are curious can see a demo of the verification tool. Metas blog post noted that the company isnt partnering with Wikimedia on this project, and that its still in the research phase and not currently being used to update content on Wikipedia.
If you imagine a not-too-distant future where everything you read on Wikipedia is accurate and reliable, wouldnt that make doing any sort of research a bit too easy? Theres something valuable about checking and comparing various sources ourselves, is there not? It was a big a leap to go from paging through heavy books to typing a few words into a search engine and hitting Enter; do we really want Wikipedia to move from a research jumping-off point to a gets-the-last-word source?
In any case, Metas AI research team will continue working toward a tool to improve the online encyclopedia. I think we were driven by curiosity at the end of the day, Petroni said. We wanted to see what was the limit of this technology. We were absolutely not sure if [this AI] could do anything meaningful in this context. No one had ever tried to do something similar.
Image Credit: Gerd Altmann from Pixabay
Read more here:
Meta Is Building an AI to Fact-Check WikipediaAll 6.5 Million Articles - Singularity Hub
- Wiki-Quantities and Wiki-Measurements: Datasets of quantities and their measurement context from Wikipedia - Nature - July 22nd, 2025 [July 22nd, 2025]
- UK online legislation threat to operations,Wikipedia to argue in court - Euronews.com - July 22nd, 2025 [July 22nd, 2025]
- Exclusive | Why Mary-Louise Parker refuses to look at her Wikipedia page: Its bad - Page Six - July 14th, 2025 [July 14th, 2025]
- Opinion: How Wikipedia became one of the greatest inventions of the modern age - The Globe and Mail - July 12th, 2025 [July 12th, 2025]
- The Last of Us Part 2 has a 'chronological mode' now, in case you wanted to play through a story with all the finesse of a Wikipedia plot summary - PC... - July 10th, 2025 [July 10th, 2025]
- Many Wikipedia Articles Are Outdated or Incorrect - Yahoo - July 8th, 2025 [July 8th, 2025]
- Wikipedia Vs. Epistemic Insecurity: Why the World's Most Trusted Website Still Matters 06/30/2025 - MediaPost - July 2nd, 2025 [July 2nd, 2025]
- Mark O'Connell: I love Wikipedia so much, I hardly even minded when it killed me off - The Irish Times - June 29th, 2025 [June 29th, 2025]
- History of Wikipedia - Australian Broadcasting Corporation - June 28th, 2025 [June 28th, 2025]
- 60 Times Wikipedia Articles Were So Scary And Unsettling People Just Had To Know More - Bored Panda - June 24th, 2025 [June 24th, 2025]
- 60 Times Wikipedia Articles Were So Scary And Unsettling People Just Had To Know More - inkl - June 24th, 2025 [June 24th, 2025]
- Wikipedia Is The Latest Place To Join The Daily Gaming Craze - Kotaku - June 22nd, 2025 [June 22nd, 2025]
- Wikipedia Did What No One Expected: This Open Platform Just Proved Its Possible to Fight Back Against Powerful AI Systems - Rude Baguette - June 22nd, 2025 [June 22nd, 2025]
- Terrifying Survey Claims ChatGPT Has Overtaken Wikipedia - futurism.com - May 24th, 2025 [May 24th, 2025]
- Wikipedia wants you to wear your love for an open internet on your sleeve - Fast Company - May 24th, 2025 [May 24th, 2025]
- Wikipedia knew first? What really happened after Portnovs killing in Madrid - Euro Weekly News - May 24th, 2025 [May 24th, 2025]
- Can Wikipedia survive the rise of AI and the age of Donald Trump? - Australian Broadcasting Corporation - May 11th, 2025 [May 11th, 2025]
- Wikipedia fights the UKs flawed and burdensome online safety rules - The Verge - May 10th, 2025 [May 10th, 2025]
- Not courts duty to tell media to delete this and take that down: SC sets aside Delhi HCs order to take down page on ANI vs Wikipedia case - The Indian... - May 10th, 2025 [May 10th, 2025]
- Propaganda tool row: SC reverses Wikipedia takedown in ANI defamation case - Siasat.com - May 10th, 2025 [May 10th, 2025]
- Wikipedia is using (some) generative AI now - The Verge - May 8th, 2025 [May 8th, 2025]
- Jay-Z Accuses Attorney Of Wikipedia Manipulation In Legal Battle - Evrim Aac - May 8th, 2025 [May 8th, 2025]
- US jurist accuses Wikipedia of disseminating propaganda and rewriting history - MSN - May 8th, 2025 [May 8th, 2025]
- Wikipedia Foundation Withdraws Appeal Before Delhi High Court Following Supreme Court Ruling - The Law Advice - May 8th, 2025 [May 8th, 2025]
- Generative AI will help Wikipedia editors moderate, translate, and onboard newcomers - the-decoder.com - May 8th, 2025 [May 8th, 2025]
- Wikipedia will apply generative AI to support editors and reduce technical barriers - The Weekly Journal - May 8th, 2025 [May 8th, 2025]
- Wikipedia turns to generative AI to support its volunteer community - TechSpot - May 8th, 2025 [May 8th, 2025]
- How is Wikipedia Progressive in the Age of AI? - Analytics Insight - May 8th, 2025 [May 8th, 2025]
- Members of Congress call on Wikipedia to curb its antisemitism - Israel National News - May 8th, 2025 [May 8th, 2025]
- Is Wikipedia in trouble? - London Evening Standard - April 12th, 2025 [April 12th, 2025]
- Wikipedia Has an Alter Ego Thats Obsessed With Questions. Everyone Should Browse It. - Slate - April 12th, 2025 [April 12th, 2025]
- ANI vs Wikipedia: What the case is about and what has happened so far - Business Standard - April 12th, 2025 [April 12th, 2025]
- Delhi HC refuses to stay order asking Wikipedia to remove alleged defamatory description of ANI - The Economic Times - April 10th, 2025 [April 10th, 2025]
- The ADL says Wikipedia contains antisemitic bias, amid dispute over how the Israel-Hamas conflict is represented on the site - CNN - March 22nd, 2025 [March 22nd, 2025]
- I Tried a TikTok-Style Version of Wikipedia, and It's Now My Favorite Way of Learning - MUO - MakeUseOf - March 22nd, 2025 [March 22nd, 2025]
- How obscure is prospective Celtics buyer William Chisholm? He didnt have a Wikipedia page until Thursday. - The Boston Globe - March 22nd, 2025 [March 22nd, 2025]
- How biased Wikipedia trashed Trumps nominees after he named them - New York Post - March 22nd, 2025 [March 22nd, 2025]
- Deconstructing Wikipedia: Its biased, lopsided and partisan - The Sunday Guardian - March 22nd, 2025 [March 22nd, 2025]
- ADL report finds clear evidence of anti-Israel bias among Wikipedia editors - JNS.org - March 22nd, 2025 [March 22nd, 2025]
- ADL: Anti-Israel Wikipedia editors colluding in anti-Israel bias on site - The Times of Israel - March 22nd, 2025 [March 22nd, 2025]
- What happens when Wikipedia, Joe Biden, and Ms. Frizzle walk into a reality show? - Queen's Journal - March 22nd, 2025 [March 22nd, 2025]
- Wikipedia posts updated to smear Patel, Hegseth, Gabbard: Watchdog - Washington Examiner - March 22nd, 2025 [March 22nd, 2025]
- John Oliver Marvels at Wikipedia Page of Mel Gibson's Father: Somehow Your Son 'Is Not the Worst Thing About You' - TheWrap - March 22nd, 2025 [March 22nd, 2025]
- Wikipedia disrupted by edit wars to manipulate pages on war in Gaza with at least 14 editors banned: report - New York Post - March 13th, 2025 [March 13th, 2025]
- Volunteer photographers are fixing Wikipedia's terrible celebrity headshots - Engadget - March 13th, 2025 [March 13th, 2025]
- Photographers Are on a Mission to Fix Wikipedia's Famously Bad Celebrity Portraits - 404 Media - March 13th, 2025 [March 13th, 2025]
- Wikipedia roiled with internal strife over page edits about the Middle East - Detroit News - March 13th, 2025 [March 13th, 2025]
- Wikipedia has a huge gender equality problem heres why it matters - The Conversation Indonesia - March 13th, 2025 [March 13th, 2025]
- Wikipedia Co-founder: It's Not Neutral, Needs to Be Investigated - Newsmax - March 13th, 2025 [March 13th, 2025]
- Volunteer Photographers Tackle Terrible Celeb Headshots on Wikipedia - PCMag UK - March 13th, 2025 [March 13th, 2025]
- Bored? Check out the Museum of All Things and dive into Wikipedia in 3D - GamingOnLinux - March 3rd, 2025 [March 3rd, 2025]
- This free interactive museum lets you explore Wikipedia like never before - Digital Trends - March 3rd, 2025 [March 3rd, 2025]
- The Wild World of Wikipedia Speedrunning - LAFM - March 3rd, 2025 [March 3rd, 2025]
- Wikipedia co-founder's open challenge to Musk: Which US govt branches 'paid to edit, monitor, update, lobby' the website? - Business Today - March 3rd, 2025 [March 3rd, 2025]
- Wikipedia co-founder may just have agreed with Elon Musk in his first viral post in a few years - The Times of India - February 27th, 2025 [February 27th, 2025]
- Elon Musk wants to change the name of Wikipedia $1 billion on the table to achieve it - Unin Rayo - February 27th, 2025 [February 27th, 2025]
- Wikipedia is now an endless 3D museum, and admission is free - Rock Paper Shotgun - February 27th, 2025 [February 27th, 2025]
- This slick new service puts ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Wikipedia on the map - Fast Company - February 27th, 2025 [February 27th, 2025]
- From agnostic to believer: Wikipedia co-founder publicly shares his testimony - CHVN Radio - February 27th, 2025 [February 27th, 2025]
- Wikipedia co-founder's request to Donald Trump and Elon Musk to probe the dubious website - OpIndia - February 27th, 2025 [February 27th, 2025]
- User booked for adding content on Chhatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj on Wikipedia - The Times of India - February 27th, 2025 [February 27th, 2025]
- Remove derogatory and objectionable reference from Wikipedia about Sambhaji Maharaj: Fadnavis - Deccan Herald - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- 'There's limit to free speech': Fadnavis orders action against Wikipedia content - The Times of India - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- Why these scientists devote time to editing and updating Wikipedia - Nature.com - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- Elon Musk's 'reminder' to Wikipedia: $1 billion offer for name change to ... still stands; come on, do .. - The Times of India - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- Maharashtra CM directs cyber police to get objectionable content on Sambhaji Maharaj removed from Wikipedia - The Indian Express - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- Elon Musk and Wikipedia are feuding - The Week - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- Wikipedia UnReliable Sources: Case Study How Wikipedia is Rigged to Prevent Balance When It Comes to Religious Articles - World Religion News - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- Behind the Blog: Backdoors and the Miracle of Wikipedia - 404 Media - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- What if TikTok and Wikipedia had a baby? - The Washington Post - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- How Wikipedia Co-Founder Found Faith After 35 Years as a Nonbeliever - Movieguide - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- Wikipedia, Are You Ready? Musk's $1 Billion Name Change Offer Still On - Analytics Insight - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- Remove objectional reference about Sambhaji Maharaj from Wikipedia: Fadnavis - The Hindu - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- Zee 24 TAAS forces Wikipedia to take action on false content about Chhatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj - MediaNews4U - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- Elon Musks $1 Billion Wikipedia Challenge: Reality or Stunt? - The Octant - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- Fadnavis asks to remove objectionable Wikipedia content on Sambhaji Maharaj - Business Standard - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- Kumbh mela among most viewed content on Wikipedia - The Times of India - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- This Web App Is TikTok for Reading Wikipedia - Lifehacker - February 14th, 2025 [February 14th, 2025]
- An infinite Wikipedia scroll I created in mere hours went viral. I think people may be tired of curated algorithms. - Business Insider - February 14th, 2025 [February 14th, 2025]
- Wikipedia Prepares for 'Increase in Threats' to US Editors From Musk and His Allies - 404 Media - February 12th, 2025 [February 12th, 2025]