Link Rot and Digital Decay on Government, News and Other Webpages – Pew Research Center
Pew Research Center conducted the analysis to examine how often online content that once existed becomes inaccessible. One part of the study looks at a representative sample of webpages that existed over the past decade to see how many are still accessible today. For this analysis, we collected a sample of pages from the Common Crawl web repository for each year from 2013 to 2023. We then tried to access those pages to see how many still exist.
A second part of the study looks at the links on existing webpages to see how many of those links are still functional. We did this by collecting a large sample of pages from government websites, news websites and the online encyclopedia Wikipedia.
We identified relevant news domains using data from the audience metrics company comScore and relevant government domains (at multiple levels of government) using data from get.gov, the official administrator for the .gov domain. We collected the news and government pages via Common Crawl and the Wikipedia pages from an archive maintained by the Wikimedia Foundation. For each collection, we identified the links on those pages and followed them to their destination to see what share of those links point to sites that are no longer accessible.
A third part of the study looks at how often individual posts on social media sites are deleted or otherwise removed from public view. We did this by collecting a large sample of public tweets on the social media platform X (then known as Twitter) in real time using the Twitter Streaming API. We then tracked the status of those tweets for a period of three months using the Twitter Search API to monitor how many were still publicly available. Refer to the report methodology for more details.
The internet is an unimaginably vast repository of modern life, with hundreds of billions of indexed webpages. But even as users across the world rely on the web to access books, images, news articles and other resources, this content sometimes disappears from view.
A new Pew Research Center analysis shows just how fleeting online content actually is:
This digital decay occurs in many different online spaces. We examined the links that appear on government and news websites, as well as in the References section of Wikipedia pages as of spring 2023. This analysis found that:
To see how digital decay plays out on social media, we also collected a real-time sample of tweets during spring 2023 on the social media platform X (then known as Twitter) and followed them for three months. We found that:
There are many ways of defining whether something on the internet that used to exist is now inaccessible to people trying to reach it today. For instance, inaccessible could mean that:
For this report, we focused on the first of these: pages that no longer exist. The other definitions of accessibility are beyond the scope of this research.
Our approach is a straightforward way of measuring whether something online is accessible or not. But even so, there is some ambiguity.
First, there are dozens of status codes indicating a problem that a user might encounter when they try to access a page. Not all of them definitively indicate whether the page is permanently defunct or just temporarily unavailable. Second, for security reasons, many sites actively try to prevent the sort of automated data collection that we used to test our full list of links.
For these reasons, we used the most conservative estimate possible for deciding whether a site was actually accessible or not. We counted pages as inaccessible only if they returned one of nine error codes that definitively indicate that the page and/or its host server no longer exist or have become nonfunctional regardless of how they are being accessed, and by whom. The full list of error codes that we included in our definition are in the methodology.
Here are some of the findings from our analysis of digital decay in various online spaces.
To conduct this part of our analysis, we collected a random sample of just under 1 million webpages from the archives of Common Crawl, an internet archive service that periodically collects snapshots of the internet as it exists at different points in time. We sampled pages collected by Common Crawl each year from 2013 through 2023 (approximately 90,000 pages per year) and checked to see if those pages still exist today.
We found that 25% of all the pages we collected from 2013 through 2023 were no longer accessible as of October 2023. This figure is the sum of two different types of broken pages: 16% of pages are individually inaccessible but come from an otherwise functional root-level domain; the other 9% are inaccessible because their entire root domain is no longer functional.
Not surprisingly, the older snapshots in our collection had the largest share of inaccessible links. Of the pages collected from the 2013 snapshot, 38% were no longer accessible in 2023. But even for pages collected in the 2021 snapshot, about one-in-five were no longer accessible just two years later.
We sampled around 500,000 pages from government websites using the Common Crawl March/April 2023 snapshot of the internet, including a mix of different levels of government (federal, state, local and others). We found every link on each page and followed a random selection of those links to their destination to see if the pages they refer to still exist.
Across the government websites we sampled, there were 42 million links. The vast majority of those links (86%) were internal, meaning they link to a different page on the same website. An explainer resource on the IRS website that links to other documents or forms on the IRS site would be an example of an internal link.
Around three-quarters of government webpages we sampled contained at least one on-page link. The typical (median) page contains 50 links, but many pages contain far more. A page in the 90th percentile contains 190 links, and a page in the 99th percentile (that is, the top 1% of pages by number of links) has 740 links.
Other facts about government webpage links:
When we followed these links, we found that 6% point to pages that are no longer accessible. Similar shares of internal and external links are no longer functional.
Overall, 21% of all the government webpages we examined contained at least one broken link. Across every level of government we looked at, there were broken links on at least 14% of pages; city government pages had the highest rates of broken links.
For this analysis, we sampled 500,000 pages from 2,063 websites classified as News/Information by the audience metrics firm comScore. The pages were collected from the Common Crawl March/April 2023 snapshot of the internet.
Across the news sites sampled, this collection contained more than 14 million links pointing to an outside website. Some 94% of these pages contain at least one external-facing link. The median page contains 20 links, and pages in the top 10% by link count have 56 links.
Like government websites, the vast majority of these links go to secure HTTP pages (those with a URL beginning with https://). Around 12% of links on these news sites point to a static file, like a PDF document. And 32% of links on news sites redirected to a different URL than the one they originally pointed to slightly less than the 39% of external links on government sites that redirect.
When we tracked these links to their destination, we found that 5% of all links on news site pages are no longer accessible. And 23% of all the pages we sampled contained at least one broken link.
Broken links are about as prevalent on the most-trafficked news websites as they are on the least-trafficked sites. Some 25% of pages on news websites in the top 20% by site traffic have at least one broken link. That is nearly identical to the 26% of sites in the bottom 20% by site traffic.
For this analysis, we collected a random sample of 50,000 English-language Wikipedia pages and examined the links in their References section. The vast majority of these pages (82%) contain at least one reference link that is, one that directs the reader to a webpage other than Wikipedia itself.
In total, there are just over 1 million reference links across all the pages we collected. The typical page has four reference links.
The analysis indicates that 11% of all references linked on Wikipedia are no longer accessible. On about 2% of source pages containing reference links, every link on the page was broken or otherwise inaccessible, while another 53% of pages contained at least one broken link.
For this analysis, we collected nearly 5 million tweets posted from March 8 to April 27, 2023, on the social media platform X, which at the time was known as Twitter. We did this using Twitters Streaming API, collecting 3,000 public tweets every 30 minutes in real time. This provided us with a representative sample of all tweets posted on the platform during that period. We monitored those tweets until June 15, 2023, and checked each day to see if they were still available on the site or not.
At the end of the observation period, we found that 18% of the tweets from our initial collection window were no longer publicly visible on the site. In a majority of cases, this was because the account that originally posted the tweet was made private, suspended or deleted entirely. For the remaining tweets, the account that posted the tweet was still visible on the site, but the individual tweet had been deleted.
Tweets were especially likely to be deleted or removed over the course of our collection period if they were:
We also found that removed or deleted tweets tended to come from newer accounts with relatively few followers and modest activityon the site. On average, tweets that were no longer visible on the site were posted by accounts around eight months younger than those whose tweets stayed on the site.
And when we analyzed the types of tweets that were no longer available, we found that retweets, quote tweets and original tweets did not differ much from the overall average. But replies were relatively unlikely to be removed just 12% of replies were inaccessible at the end of our monitoring period.
Most tweets that are removed from the site tend to disappear soon after being posted. In addition to looking at how many tweets from our collection were still available at the end of our tracking period, we conducted a survival analysis to see how long these tweets tended to remain available. We found that:
Put another way: Half of tweets that are eventually removed from the platform are unavailable within the first six days of being posted. And 90% of these tweets are unavailable within 46 days.
Tweets dont always disappear forever, though. Some 6% of the tweets we collected disappeared and then became available again at a later point. This could be due to an account going private and then returning to public status, or to the account being suspended and later reinstated. Of those reappeared tweets, the vast majority (90%) were still accessible on Twitter at the end of the monitoring period.
Link:
Link Rot and Digital Decay on Government, News and Other Webpages - Pew Research Center
- Creepy jail cell pics and Trump Wikipedia page included in new Jeffrey Epstein files - The Independent - February 1st, 2026 [February 1st, 2026]
- Wikipedia Inks AI Deals with Microsoft, Meta and Perplexity on 25th Birthday - Broadband Breakfast - February 1st, 2026 [February 1st, 2026]
- People Shared The Most Extremely Wild, Dark, And Interesting Wikipedia "Facts" - BuzzFeed - February 1st, 2026 [February 1st, 2026]
- Wikipedia Is 25 Years Old. How Does That Make You Feel? - VICE - February 1st, 2026 [February 1st, 2026]
- The IAC and Wikimedia Spain promote an edit-a-thon to raise the profile of women in astronomy on Wikipedia - Instituto de Astrofsica de Canarias IAC - February 1st, 2026 [February 1st, 2026]
- Fact check | Viral screenshot shows Ajit Pawar's death was updated on Wikipedia hours before Baramati crash - WION - February 1st, 2026 [February 1st, 2026]
- Netflixs Take That documentary feels like a Wikipedia entry brought to life - The Telegraph - January 28th, 2026 [January 28th, 2026]
- Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales on the pillars of organizational trust - ASBN Small Business Network - January 28th, 2026 [January 28th, 2026]
- Discount garmin fenix 5 pro Online Sale Garmin Fenix Wikipedia - Through The Fence Baseball - January 28th, 2026 [January 28th, 2026]
- Shop solar movies green book Flash Sales The Green Inferno film Wikipedia - Through The Fence Baseball - January 28th, 2026 [January 28th, 2026]
- Cheap how many rings kd has Factory Sale Kevin Durant Wikipedia - Through The Fence Baseball - January 28th, 2026 [January 28th, 2026]
- Cheap swiss eagle watches wikipedia Online Swiss Eagle Men - Through The Fence Baseball - January 28th, 2026 [January 28th, 2026]
- Shop poljot watches wikipedia Outlet Online Poljot Vintage Watches the Flagship of Soviet Watch Brands - Through The Fence Baseball - January 28th, 2026 [January 28th, 2026]
- Cheap boots with wooden soles Discount Clog Wikipedia - Through The Fence Baseball - January 28th, 2026 [January 28th, 2026]
- Cheap raymond clothes online Shop Raymond Group Wikipedia - Through The Fence Baseball - January 28th, 2026 [January 28th, 2026]
- Cheap dragon ball super broly movie watch now Online Broly Wikipedia - Through The Fence Baseball - January 28th, 2026 [January 28th, 2026]
- Shop cinebay new movies Clearance The Fugitive 1993 film Wikipedia - Through The Fence Baseball - January 28th, 2026 [January 28th, 2026]
- Wikipedia at 25: Jimmy Wales on AI Hallucination and why he trusts humans over algorithms - The Federal - January 28th, 2026 [January 28th, 2026]
- Best are princess cut diamonds more expensive Factory Sale Princess cut Wikipedia - Through The Fence Baseball - January 28th, 2026 [January 28th, 2026]
- Wikipedia celebrates its first 25 years with a warning about the threat of AI to its next 25 - PC Gamer - January 28th, 2026 [January 28th, 2026]
- 25 years of Wikipedia, 25 years of SF drama - sfstandard.com - January 26th, 2026 [January 26th, 2026]
- A Birthday Cake Song for 25 Years of Wikipedia! - Wikimedia.org - January 26th, 2026 [January 26th, 2026]
- Wikipedia volunteers spent years cataloging AI tells. Now theres a plugin to avoid them. - Ars Technica - January 26th, 2026 [January 26th, 2026]
- Wikipedia, Qatar, and the Future of Knowledge - Algemeiner.com - January 26th, 2026 [January 26th, 2026]
- Wikipedia Turns 25: Celebrating a Legacy of Collective Knowledge and Volunteer Dedication - Hoodline - January 26th, 2026 [January 26th, 2026]
- Pro-government editors wiped Iran rights abuses from Wikipedia - watchdog - - January 26th, 2026 [January 26th, 2026]
- Wikipedia Marks 25 Years by Spotlighting the Volunteers Behind the Platform - DesignRush - January 26th, 2026 [January 26th, 2026]
- Celebrating 25 Years of Wikipedia: WikiClub Tech UIT Marks a Milestone in Open Knowledge - Wikimedia.org - January 26th, 2026 [January 26th, 2026]
- Wikipedia turns 25 and spotlights the humans behind the worlds knowledge - Creative Boom - January 26th, 2026 [January 26th, 2026]
- I'm devastated these Wikipedia logos were robbed from us - Creative Bloq - January 26th, 2026 [January 26th, 2026]
- Wikipedia turns 25 and shares a glimpse into the lives of its volunteer editors - The Verge - January 18th, 2026 [January 18th, 2026]
- Wikipedia celebrates 25 years of knowledge at its best - Wikimedia Foundation - January 18th, 2026 [January 18th, 2026]
- London PR firm rewrites Wikipedia for governments and billionaires - TBIJ - January 18th, 2026 [January 18th, 2026]
- Microsoft, Meta, and Amazon are paying up for enterprise access to Wikipedia - The Verge - January 18th, 2026 [January 18th, 2026]
- Wikipedia's 25th anniversary: The story behind the creation of Concord, New Hampshire, article. - Concord Monitor - January 18th, 2026 [January 18th, 2026]
- At 25, Wikipedia Now Faces Its Most Existential ThreatGenerative A.I. - Scientific American - January 18th, 2026 [January 18th, 2026]
- Wikipedia marks 25 years by celebrating its volunteer army of editors - Ad Age - January 18th, 2026 [January 18th, 2026]
- Wikipedia Turns 25, Sells Access To Amazon, Meta, Microsoft And Other AI Giants - Forbes - January 18th, 2026 [January 18th, 2026]
- Wikipedia Is Now 25 Years Old [Citation Not Needed] - PCMag - January 18th, 2026 [January 18th, 2026]
- Wikipedia is now 25 years old worlds 7th most popular website now has over 7 million English articles and 7 billion monthly visitors - Tom's Hardware - January 18th, 2026 [January 18th, 2026]
- Microsoft, Meta, and Amazon are paying up for enterprise access to Wikipedia - TechRadar - January 18th, 2026 [January 18th, 2026]
- After Being Pillaged By AI Companies, Wikipedia Signs Deal to Get Paid By Them - Futurism - January 18th, 2026 [January 18th, 2026]
- Wikipedia is more important, and more vulnerable, than ever - The Boston Globe - January 18th, 2026 [January 18th, 2026]
- Wikipedia Partners With Big Tech Companies To Allow Access To Its Data For Developing And Training AI Models - AfroTech - January 18th, 2026 [January 18th, 2026]
- Wikipedia Marks 25 Years, Spotlighting Africas Growing Role In Knowledge - AfricaBrief - January 18th, 2026 [January 18th, 2026]
- Daily Digest: Wikipedia cuts deal with AI giants, Green Day coming to S.F. waterfront - San Francisco Business Times - The Business Journals - January 18th, 2026 [January 18th, 2026]
- AI firms need to pay fair share for using Wikipedia, founder says - Euronews.com - January 18th, 2026 [January 18th, 2026]
- Newsletter | Ecocide, a controversial mega-bridge & Wikipedia manipulation - Follow the Money - Platform for investigative journalism - January 18th, 2026 [January 18th, 2026]
- Wikipedia is now getting paid by Meta, Microsoft, Perplexity, and other AI companies - TechSpot - January 18th, 2026 [January 18th, 2026]
- Wikipedia Strikes Lucrative Deals with Tech Giants for AI Training Access - Technology Org - January 18th, 2026 [January 18th, 2026]
- Wikipedia commemorates 25th anniversary by inking AI licensing deals - Yahoo News Malaysia - January 18th, 2026 [January 18th, 2026]
- Microsoft, Meta, Amazon, Perplexity, and Mistral AI officially announced as paid program partners of Wikipedia - GIGAZINE - January 18th, 2026 [January 18th, 2026]
- How Africa Is Helping Rewrite the Worlds Knowledge as Wikipedia Turns 25 - Dawan Africa - January 18th, 2026 [January 18th, 2026]
- Why Microsoft, Meta, and Amazon Are Now Paying Wikipedia - TechRepublic - January 16th, 2026 [January 16th, 2026]
- Wikipedia will share content with AI firms in new licensing deals - Ars Technica - January 16th, 2026 [January 16th, 2026]
- Editorial: Happy 25th birthday, Wikipedia. We now admit to liking you. - Chicago Tribune - January 16th, 2026 [January 16th, 2026]
- Wikipedia commemorates 25th anniversary by inking AI licensing deals - AOL.com - January 16th, 2026 [January 16th, 2026]
- As Wikipedia turns 25, its future will depend on AI for better or worse - Sherwood News - January 16th, 2026 [January 16th, 2026]
- Can Wikipedia survive the age of AI? - San Francisco Chronicle - January 16th, 2026 [January 16th, 2026]
- Wikipedia inks AI deals with Microsoft, Meta and Perplexity as it marks 25th birthday - Oskaloosa Herald - January 16th, 2026 [January 16th, 2026]
- If You Cant Beat Them, Join Them: Wikipedia Shows the Way Into an AI Universe - CXOToday.com - January 16th, 2026 [January 16th, 2026]
- Wikipedia signs AI content training deals with Microsoft, Meta, and Amazon - The American Bazaar - January 16th, 2026 [January 16th, 2026]
- Let the birthday festivities begin! Wikipedia turns 25 - Wikimedia.org - January 16th, 2026 [January 16th, 2026]
- Wikipedia may be the largest compendium of human knowledge ever created, but can it survive? - Financial Times - January 16th, 2026 [January 16th, 2026]
- Wikipedia turns 25 today but faces more threats than ever before - 9to5Mac - January 16th, 2026 [January 16th, 2026]
- Wikipedia at 25: can its original ideals survive in the age of AI? - The Conversation - January 16th, 2026 [January 16th, 2026]
- Wikipedia inks AI deals with Microsoft, Meta and Perplexity as it marks 25th birthday - nwitimes.com - January 16th, 2026 [January 16th, 2026]
- Wikipedia inks AI deals with Microsoft, Meta and Perplexity as it marks 25th birthday - Kearney Hub - January 16th, 2026 [January 16th, 2026]
- Wikipedia inks AI deals with Microsoft, Meta and Perplexity as it marks 25th birthday - La Crosse Tribune - January 16th, 2026 [January 16th, 2026]
- Wikipedia signs data agreements with tech giants for AI training ahead of 25th anniversary - - January 16th, 2026 [January 16th, 2026]
- Wikipedia at 25: Microsoft, Meta, Amazon Now Pay to Train AI on It - H2S Media - January 16th, 2026 [January 16th, 2026]
- Wikipedia inks AI deals with Microsoft, Meta and Perplexity as it marks 25th birthday - Winston-Salem Journal - January 16th, 2026 [January 16th, 2026]
- Happy Birthday, Wikipedia: We need you now more than ever - Salon.com - January 16th, 2026 [January 16th, 2026]
- Wikipedia inks AI deals with Microsoft, Meta and Perplexity as it marks 25th birthday - Kenosha News - January 16th, 2026 [January 16th, 2026]
- Wikipedia signs AI deal with Amazon, Meta, Microsoft and Perplexity on 25th anniversary: Here's what this means - Mint - January 16th, 2026 [January 16th, 2026]
- Indian doctor in Sweden stars in Wikipedia's 25th anniversary celebrations - WION - January 16th, 2026 [January 16th, 2026]
- Wikipedia commemorates 25th anniversary by inking AI licensing deals - The Independent - January 16th, 2026 [January 16th, 2026]
- Wikipedia Secures AI Licensing Deals with Amazon, Meta, and Microsoft as Traffic Decline Threatens Sustainability - WinBuzzer - January 16th, 2026 [January 16th, 2026]
- The Wikipedia-AI Pact: A 25th Anniversary Strategy to Secure the Worlds Source of Truth - FinancialContent - January 16th, 2026 [January 16th, 2026]
- Wikipedia celebrates 25 years of free knowledge and global impact - Geo News - January 16th, 2026 [January 16th, 2026]