Link Rot and Digital Decay on Government, News and Other Webpages – Pew Research Center
Pew Research Center conducted the analysis to examine how often online content that once existed becomes inaccessible. One part of the study looks at a representative sample of webpages that existed over the past decade to see how many are still accessible today. For this analysis, we collected a sample of pages from the Common Crawl web repository for each year from 2013 to 2023. We then tried to access those pages to see how many still exist.
A second part of the study looks at the links on existing webpages to see how many of those links are still functional. We did this by collecting a large sample of pages from government websites, news websites and the online encyclopedia Wikipedia.
We identified relevant news domains using data from the audience metrics company comScore and relevant government domains (at multiple levels of government) using data from get.gov, the official administrator for the .gov domain. We collected the news and government pages via Common Crawl and the Wikipedia pages from an archive maintained by the Wikimedia Foundation. For each collection, we identified the links on those pages and followed them to their destination to see what share of those links point to sites that are no longer accessible.
A third part of the study looks at how often individual posts on social media sites are deleted or otherwise removed from public view. We did this by collecting a large sample of public tweets on the social media platform X (then known as Twitter) in real time using the Twitter Streaming API. We then tracked the status of those tweets for a period of three months using the Twitter Search API to monitor how many were still publicly available. Refer to the report methodology for more details.
The internet is an unimaginably vast repository of modern life, with hundreds of billions of indexed webpages. But even as users across the world rely on the web to access books, images, news articles and other resources, this content sometimes disappears from view.
A new Pew Research Center analysis shows just how fleeting online content actually is:
This digital decay occurs in many different online spaces. We examined the links that appear on government and news websites, as well as in the References section of Wikipedia pages as of spring 2023. This analysis found that:
To see how digital decay plays out on social media, we also collected a real-time sample of tweets during spring 2023 on the social media platform X (then known as Twitter) and followed them for three months. We found that:
There are many ways of defining whether something on the internet that used to exist is now inaccessible to people trying to reach it today. For instance, inaccessible could mean that:
For this report, we focused on the first of these: pages that no longer exist. The other definitions of accessibility are beyond the scope of this research.
Our approach is a straightforward way of measuring whether something online is accessible or not. But even so, there is some ambiguity.
First, there are dozens of status codes indicating a problem that a user might encounter when they try to access a page. Not all of them definitively indicate whether the page is permanently defunct or just temporarily unavailable. Second, for security reasons, many sites actively try to prevent the sort of automated data collection that we used to test our full list of links.
For these reasons, we used the most conservative estimate possible for deciding whether a site was actually accessible or not. We counted pages as inaccessible only if they returned one of nine error codes that definitively indicate that the page and/or its host server no longer exist or have become nonfunctional regardless of how they are being accessed, and by whom. The full list of error codes that we included in our definition are in the methodology.
Here are some of the findings from our analysis of digital decay in various online spaces.
To conduct this part of our analysis, we collected a random sample of just under 1 million webpages from the archives of Common Crawl, an internet archive service that periodically collects snapshots of the internet as it exists at different points in time. We sampled pages collected by Common Crawl each year from 2013 through 2023 (approximately 90,000 pages per year) and checked to see if those pages still exist today.
We found that 25% of all the pages we collected from 2013 through 2023 were no longer accessible as of October 2023. This figure is the sum of two different types of broken pages: 16% of pages are individually inaccessible but come from an otherwise functional root-level domain; the other 9% are inaccessible because their entire root domain is no longer functional.
Not surprisingly, the older snapshots in our collection had the largest share of inaccessible links. Of the pages collected from the 2013 snapshot, 38% were no longer accessible in 2023. But even for pages collected in the 2021 snapshot, about one-in-five were no longer accessible just two years later.
We sampled around 500,000 pages from government websites using the Common Crawl March/April 2023 snapshot of the internet, including a mix of different levels of government (federal, state, local and others). We found every link on each page and followed a random selection of those links to their destination to see if the pages they refer to still exist.
Across the government websites we sampled, there were 42 million links. The vast majority of those links (86%) were internal, meaning they link to a different page on the same website. An explainer resource on the IRS website that links to other documents or forms on the IRS site would be an example of an internal link.
Around three-quarters of government webpages we sampled contained at least one on-page link. The typical (median) page contains 50 links, but many pages contain far more. A page in the 90th percentile contains 190 links, and a page in the 99th percentile (that is, the top 1% of pages by number of links) has 740 links.
Other facts about government webpage links:
When we followed these links, we found that 6% point to pages that are no longer accessible. Similar shares of internal and external links are no longer functional.
Overall, 21% of all the government webpages we examined contained at least one broken link. Across every level of government we looked at, there were broken links on at least 14% of pages; city government pages had the highest rates of broken links.
For this analysis, we sampled 500,000 pages from 2,063 websites classified as News/Information by the audience metrics firm comScore. The pages were collected from the Common Crawl March/April 2023 snapshot of the internet.
Across the news sites sampled, this collection contained more than 14 million links pointing to an outside website. Some 94% of these pages contain at least one external-facing link. The median page contains 20 links, and pages in the top 10% by link count have 56 links.
Like government websites, the vast majority of these links go to secure HTTP pages (those with a URL beginning with https://). Around 12% of links on these news sites point to a static file, like a PDF document. And 32% of links on news sites redirected to a different URL than the one they originally pointed to slightly less than the 39% of external links on government sites that redirect.
When we tracked these links to their destination, we found that 5% of all links on news site pages are no longer accessible. And 23% of all the pages we sampled contained at least one broken link.
Broken links are about as prevalent on the most-trafficked news websites as they are on the least-trafficked sites. Some 25% of pages on news websites in the top 20% by site traffic have at least one broken link. That is nearly identical to the 26% of sites in the bottom 20% by site traffic.
For this analysis, we collected a random sample of 50,000 English-language Wikipedia pages and examined the links in their References section. The vast majority of these pages (82%) contain at least one reference link that is, one that directs the reader to a webpage other than Wikipedia itself.
In total, there are just over 1 million reference links across all the pages we collected. The typical page has four reference links.
The analysis indicates that 11% of all references linked on Wikipedia are no longer accessible. On about 2% of source pages containing reference links, every link on the page was broken or otherwise inaccessible, while another 53% of pages contained at least one broken link.
For this analysis, we collected nearly 5 million tweets posted from March 8 to April 27, 2023, on the social media platform X, which at the time was known as Twitter. We did this using Twitters Streaming API, collecting 3,000 public tweets every 30 minutes in real time. This provided us with a representative sample of all tweets posted on the platform during that period. We monitored those tweets until June 15, 2023, and checked each day to see if they were still available on the site or not.
At the end of the observation period, we found that 18% of the tweets from our initial collection window were no longer publicly visible on the site. In a majority of cases, this was because the account that originally posted the tweet was made private, suspended or deleted entirely. For the remaining tweets, the account that posted the tweet was still visible on the site, but the individual tweet had been deleted.
Tweets were especially likely to be deleted or removed over the course of our collection period if they were:
We also found that removed or deleted tweets tended to come from newer accounts with relatively few followers and modest activityon the site. On average, tweets that were no longer visible on the site were posted by accounts around eight months younger than those whose tweets stayed on the site.
And when we analyzed the types of tweets that were no longer available, we found that retweets, quote tweets and original tweets did not differ much from the overall average. But replies were relatively unlikely to be removed just 12% of replies were inaccessible at the end of our monitoring period.
Most tweets that are removed from the site tend to disappear soon after being posted. In addition to looking at how many tweets from our collection were still available at the end of our tracking period, we conducted a survival analysis to see how long these tweets tended to remain available. We found that:
Put another way: Half of tweets that are eventually removed from the platform are unavailable within the first six days of being posted. And 90% of these tweets are unavailable within 46 days.
Tweets dont always disappear forever, though. Some 6% of the tweets we collected disappeared and then became available again at a later point. This could be due to an account going private and then returning to public status, or to the account being suspended and later reinstated. Of those reappeared tweets, the vast majority (90%) were still accessible on Twitter at the end of the monitoring period.
Link:
Link Rot and Digital Decay on Government, News and Other Webpages - Pew Research Center
- Access Restored to Wikipedia in Russia After Overnight Outage - The Moscow Times - September 2nd, 2026 [September 2nd, 2026]
- You, too, can squeeze an offline Wikipedia onto an ESP32 CYD with this project - XDA - September 2nd, 2026 [September 2nd, 2026]
- Dolly Partons Wikipedia page vandalised with swastika hours after her death - The Jewish Chronicle - September 2nd, 2026 [September 2nd, 2026]
- African science innovation is growing exponentially, but it's almost entirely absent from Wikipedia. Why that's a problem. - Genetic Literacy Project - September 2nd, 2026 [September 2nd, 2026]
- Anna Delveys crusade against Wikipedia, and what it means for the First Amendment - Straight Arrow - August 18th, 2026 [August 18th, 2026]
- Toast, boners, and margarine haters all come together on Wikipedia - A.V. Club - August 18th, 2026 [August 18th, 2026]
- Depths of Wikipedia (Annie Rauwerda) Underbelly Cowbarn, Bristo Square | Review by Avery Mitchell - theatrescotland.co.uk - August 14th, 2026 [August 14th, 2026]
- Hes edited six million Wikipedia articles for free and almost no one knows his name - News24 - August 14th, 2026 [August 14th, 2026]
- Poet Kyle Flemmer zooms in on Wikipedia as a bastion of collective knowledge in new collection - Yahoo News Canada - August 14th, 2026 [August 14th, 2026]
- Google Search Briefly Showed False 'Sam Altman Dead' Result Amid Wikipedia Vandalism - finance.biggo.com - August 14th, 2026 [August 14th, 2026]
- Poet Kyle Flemmer zooms in on Wikipedia as a bastion of collective knowledge in new collection - Calgary Herald - August 14th, 2026 [August 14th, 2026]
- Wikipedia has become compromised by intelligence agencies and ideological capture - thevibes.com - August 14th, 2026 [August 14th, 2026]
- Evidence of sneaky Shellrelated monitoring and editing of Wikipedia - Royal Dutch Shell Plc .com - August 12th, 2026 [August 12th, 2026]
- From Should we? to How do we?: A community weekend on AI and Wikipedia - WikiMedia.org - August 12th, 2026 [August 12th, 2026]
- A Wikipedia-Loving but Wikipedian-Intimidated Dork Explores the Minnesota Wiknic - Racket MN - July 21st, 2026 [July 21st, 2026]
- After 3,000 Years, People Are Finally Reading The Odysseyat Least on Wikipedia - WSJ - July 21st, 2026 [July 21st, 2026]
- Welcome to the high-stakes universe of World Cup Wikipedia editing - The New York Times - July 21st, 2026 [July 21st, 2026]
- Does Israel Control the World Cup Wikipedia? - The Times of Israel - July 21st, 2026 [July 21st, 2026]
- After 3,000 Years, People Are Finally Reading The Odysseyat Least on Wikipedia | Hollywood - Hindustan Times - July 21st, 2026 [July 21st, 2026]
- There's a way to have the entire Wikipedia offline, and it's smaller than you'd expect - MakeUseOf - July 21st, 2026 [July 21st, 2026]
- Sanger Banned by Wikipedia: Diagnosing a Disease - Science and Culture Today - July 21st, 2026 [July 21st, 2026]
- How Wikipedia Turned a World Cup Controversy into an Antisemitic Conspiracy Theory - The Free Press - July 13th, 2026 [July 13th, 2026]
- PeaZip 11.2 Releases With Offline Wikipedia Support And Upgraded Drag-and-Drop - Open Source For You - July 13th, 2026 [July 13th, 2026]
- EduWiki Workshop: Combining PETScan and Generative AI for Smarter Wikipedia Editing - Wikimedia.org - July 13th, 2026 [July 13th, 2026]
- I co-founded Wikipedia, but an anonymous mob runs the show and now Im banned - Washington Examiner - July 11th, 2026 [July 11th, 2026]
- Wikipedia co-founder Larry Sanger says he was banned from editing articles on the site - Storyboard18 - July 11th, 2026 [July 11th, 2026]
- Whats new in The Wikipedia Library (April June 2026) - Wikimedia.org - July 11th, 2026 [July 11th, 2026]
- Hurry: Wikipedia pays up to R$ 2,500 for those who write about Minas Gerais, contest entries end on July 10, 2026, and even beginners can... - July 11th, 2026 [July 11th, 2026]
- Someone changed this World Cup referees Wikipedia page to say he was Jewish. Enraged soccer fans believed it. - The Forward - July 11th, 2026 [July 11th, 2026]
- Wikipedia Is Battling for the Soul of the Internet - The New York Times - July 6th, 2026 [July 6th, 2026]
- Taylor Swifts surname on Wikipedia changes swiftly after Kelce wedding mix-up - OregonLive.com - July 6th, 2026 [July 6th, 2026]
- Whats Going on With Wikipedia? - The Dispatch - July 6th, 2026 [July 6th, 2026]
- Wikipedia is battling for the soul of the internet - The Mercury News - July 6th, 2026 [July 6th, 2026]
- Wikipedia is under threat on every front. In response, the organization that supports the site, the Wikimedia Foundation, is increasing its lobbying... - July 6th, 2026 [July 6th, 2026]
- Wiki Spy lets you explore 43,815 cut-out Wikipedia objects - Boing Boing - July 1st, 2026 [July 1st, 2026]
- A Wikipedia Founder Is Barred From Editing Articles on the Site - The New York Times - July 1st, 2026 [July 1st, 2026]
- Wikipedia Just Banned One of Its Co-Foundersand It Wasn't for His Constant Criticism of the Site - inc.com - July 1st, 2026 [July 1st, 2026]
- Wikipedia ban on co-founder highlights disputes over alleged leftist, anti-Israel bias - The Times of Israel - July 1st, 2026 [July 1st, 2026]
- Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales says trust is key in the age of AI - Axios - July 1st, 2026 [July 1st, 2026]
- Ageless Galaxy x Wikipedia Celebrates 25 Years of Shared Knowledge Through Community - stupidDOPE - July 1st, 2026 [July 1st, 2026]
- Wikipedia x Ageless Galaxy Stitch 25 Years of Free Knowledge Into an Exclusive Jakarta Drop - Hypebeast - July 1st, 2026 [July 1st, 2026]
- Seven Years of Creating Financial Knowledge on Armenian Wikipedia - Wikimedia.org - July 1st, 2026 [July 1st, 2026]
- Wikipedia founder + Alabama-native Jimmy Wales shares advice for the next generation of innovators - The Bama Buzz - July 1st, 2026 [July 1st, 2026]
- The Kremlin Creates Wikipedia Clones in Foreign Languages to Teach Neural Networks to Spread Its Propaganda - - July 1st, 2026 [July 1st, 2026]
- Wikipedia Co-Founder Has Been Banned from Editing the Site - 80 Level - July 1st, 2026 [July 1st, 2026]
- Wikipedia's What Came First? game arrives on iPhone: Here's how to access it - Moneycontrol.com - June 16th, 2026 [June 16th, 2026]
- Wikipedia can be biased on disputed issues: Co-founder on bias against India, Hindus | 4 anonymous editors altered HAF's Wikipedia page | Inshorts -... - June 16th, 2026 [June 16th, 2026]
- Wikipedia Exposed: 12 cases that raise serious questions about Anti-Hindu bias and narrative manipulation - VSK Telangana - June 16th, 2026 [June 16th, 2026]
- Harry Souttar: Socceroos rock and newly appointed defence minister according to Wikipedia - LCANews - June 16th, 2026 [June 16th, 2026]
- Wikipedia just launched its daily historical facts game on iPhone: Which came first? - 9to5Mac - June 12th, 2026 [June 12th, 2026]
- Wikipedia Has More Than 40 Million Entries But These 82 Are Weirder Than The Others - AOL.com - June 7th, 2026 [June 7th, 2026]
- Celebrating 25 Years of Wikipedia in Slovakia - Wikimedia.org - June 7th, 2026 [June 7th, 2026]
- Translating Baltics Naval History: Bringing the Royal Baltic Fleet to Spanish Wikipedia - Wikimedia.org - June 7th, 2026 [June 7th, 2026]
- I Chose to Preserve, Not Just Translate: Keeping Setswana Alive on Wikipedia - Wikimedia.org - June 7th, 2026 [June 7th, 2026]
- This retelling of Aztec history will lead you down some random Wikipedia pages - waterford-news.ie - June 7th, 2026 [June 7th, 2026]
- Hundreds of prolific Wikipedia editors are threatening to go on strike - The Verge - May 29th, 2026 [May 29th, 2026]
- Cross-Platform and Cross-Lingual Dynamics of Wikipedia Sharing and Contribution - The Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence - May 29th, 2026 [May 29th, 2026]
- 2026 Wikipedia Edit-a-thon: Women Photojournalists - National Museum of Women in the Arts - May 29th, 2026 [May 29th, 2026]
- Hundreds of Wikipedia editors are threatening to go on strike and the reason is these engineers - The Times of India - May 29th, 2026 [May 29th, 2026]
- How Anonymous Wikipedia Editors Influence Global Narratives and AI Systems - Foundation for Defense of Democracies - May 29th, 2026 [May 29th, 2026]
- 21 Extremely Creepy Wikipedia Pages That Are For Adults Only - BuzzFeed - May 29th, 2026 [May 29th, 2026]
- Every Museum Has a Story: Shared Through Collaboration on Bangla Wikipedia - Wikimedia.org - May 29th, 2026 [May 29th, 2026]
- The Wikimedia Foundation, which operates Wikipedia, has fired its former CTO and disbanded its community technology team, drawing criticism for... - May 29th, 2026 [May 29th, 2026]
- Seeing Like an AI: How LLMs Apply (and Misapply) Wikipedia Neutrality Norms - The Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence - May 29th, 2026 [May 29th, 2026]
- This Page Shared 69 Weird Animal Facts People Discovered While Falling Into A Wikipedia Rabbit Hole - AOL.com - May 29th, 2026 [May 29th, 2026]
- Records of an elementary school that is closing will be preserved on Wikipedia - Wikimedia.org - May 29th, 2026 [May 29th, 2026]
- This Wikipedia clone is entirely generated by AI. Users are turning it into a cesspool - Fast Company - May 16th, 2026 [May 16th, 2026]
- Wikipedia and Reddit Now Drive Over 25% of ChatGPT Citations in the U.S., New 5W Research Finds -- WSJ, NYT, and Bloomberg Do Not Appear in the Top 20... - May 16th, 2026 [May 16th, 2026]
- A Wikipedia Clone Built on AI Hallucinations Is Here to Hasten Along the Death of the Internet - Gizmodo - May 16th, 2026 [May 16th, 2026]
- Left-Wing Wikipedia Editors Fight To Keep Democrat Adam Hamawys Ties to Blind Sheikh Offline Even Though House Candidate Testified to Their Friendship... - May 16th, 2026 [May 16th, 2026]
- This bloody Wikipedia is 100% AI delusion and thats the point - Cybernews - May 16th, 2026 [May 16th, 2026]
- Halupedia explained: Why AI Wikipedia clone is raising red flags - The News International - May 16th, 2026 [May 16th, 2026]
- The Perfect Degenerate Time-Killer: Halupedia The Infinite Hallucinating Wikipedia - quasa.io - May 13th, 2026 [May 13th, 2026]
- 'A really bad idea': Wikipedia's Jimmy Wales on Australia's social media ban, trust and the truth - Crikey - May 1st, 2026 [May 1st, 2026]
- The Wikipedia Play: Overlooked Reputation Lever for Law Firms in the AI Era - Law.com - May 1st, 2026 [May 1st, 2026]
- Indonesia, Wikimedia reach deal to keep Wikipedia accessible amid regulatory concerns - Indonesia Business Post - May 1st, 2026 [May 1st, 2026]
- Capacity Building: Beyond Article Writing Organizing Wikipedia in Your Language with Categories and Other Curation Tools - Wikimedia.org - May 1st, 2026 [May 1st, 2026]
- Wikipedia has become a battlefield, and we are on the losing side - ynetnews - April 27th, 2026 [April 27th, 2026]
- How to Find the Best and Cheapest Airfares Using Google Flights and Wikipedia (Yes, Wikipedia!) - AFAR - April 27th, 2026 [April 27th, 2026]
- FAO expands free public access to agrifood knowledge through collaboration on Wikipedia - Food and Agriculture Organization - April 27th, 2026 [April 27th, 2026]