Internet Bots Fight Each Other Because They’re All Too Human – WIRED
Slide: 1 / of 1. Caption: Getty Images
No one saw the crisis coming: a coordinated vandalistic effort to insert Squidward references into articles totally unrelated to Squidward. In 2006, Wikipedia was really starting to get going, and really couldnt afford to have any SpongeBob SquarePants-related high jinks sullying the sites growing reputation. It was an embarrassment. Someone had to stop Squidward.
The Wikipedia community knew it couldnt possibly mobilize human editors to face down the trollsthe onslaught was too great, the work too tedious. So instead an admin cobbled together a bot that automatically flagged errant insertions of the Cephalopod Who Shall Not Be Named. And it worked. Wikipedia beat back the Squidward threat, and in so doing fell into a powerful alliance with the bots. Today, hundreds of algorithmic assistants fight all manner of vandals, fix typos, and even create articles on their own. Wikipedia would be a mess without them.
But a funny thing happens when you lock a bunch of bots in a virtual room: Sometimes they dont get along. Sometimes a pair of bots will descend into a slapfight, overwriting each others decisions thousands of times for years on end. According to a new study in PLOS ONE, it happens a lot. Why? Because no matter how cold and calculating bots may seem, they tend to act all too human. And these are the internets nice, not-at-all racist bots. Imagine AI-powered personal digital assistants in the same room yelling at each other all day. Google Home versus Alexa, anyone?
On Wikipedia, bots handle the excruciatingly dull and monotonous work that would drive an army of human editors madif an army of editors could even keep up with all the work. A bot does not tire. It does not get angrywell, at least not at humans. Its programmed for a task, and it sees to that task with a consistency and devotion humans cant match.
While disagreements between human Wikipedia editors tend to fizzle, fights between bots can drag on for months or years. The study found that bots are far more likely to argue than human editors on the English version of Wikipedia: Bots each overrode another bot an average of 105 times over the course of a decade, compared to an average of three times for human editors. Bots get carried away because they simply dont know any bettertheyre just bits of code, after all.
But that doesnt mean they arent trustworthy. Bots are handling relatively simple tasks like spellchecking, not making larger editorial decisions. Indeed, its only because of the bots work that human editors can concentrate on those big-picture problems at all. Still, when they disagree, they dont rationally debate like humans might. Theyre servants to their code. And their sheer reachcontinuously scanning more than 5 million articles in the English Wikipedia alonemeans they find plenty of problems to correct and potentially disagree on.
And bots do far more than their fair share of work. The number of human editors on the English Wikipedia may dwarf the number of botssome 30,000 active meatspace editors versus about 300 active editors made purely out of codebut the bots are insanely productive contributors. Theyre not even quite visible if you put them on a map among other editors, says the University of Oxfords Taha Yasseri, a co-author of the study. But they do a lot. The proportion of all the edits done by robots in different languages would vary from 10 percent, up to 40 even 50 percent in certain language editions. Yet Wikipedia hasnt descended into a bloody bot battlefield. Thats because humans closely monitor the bots, which do far more good than harm.
But bots inevitably collide, Yasseri contends. For example, the study found that over the course of three years, two bots that monitor for double redirects on Wikipedia had themselves quite the tiff. (A redirect happens when, for instance, a search for UK forwards you to the article for United Kingdom. A double redirect is a redirect that forwards to another redirect, a big Wikipedia no-no.) Across some 1,800 articles, Scepbot reverted RussBots edits a total of 1,031 times, while RussBot returned the favor 906 times. This happens because of discrepancies in naming conventionsRussBot, for instance, made Ricotta al forno redirect to Ricotta cheese, when previously it redirected to Ricotta. Then Scepbot came in and reverted that change.
For its part, Wikipedia disputes that these bots arent really fighting.
If, for example, Scepbot had performed the original double-redirect cleanup and RussBot performed the second double-redirect cleanup, then it would appear that they are reverting each other, says Aaron Halfaker, principal research scientist at the Wikimedia Foundation. But in reality, the bots are collaborating together to keep the redirect graph of the wiki clean.
Were perfectly aware of which bots are running right now. Aaron Halfaker, Wikimedia Foundation
Still, Halfaker acknowledges that bots reverting each other can look like conflict. Say for example you might have an editor that wants to make sure that all the English language lists on Wikipedia use the Oxford comma, and another editor believes that we should not use the Oxford comma. (Full disclosure: This writer believes the Oxford comma is essential and that anyone who doesnt use it is a barbarian.) But Wikipedia has a bot approval process to catch these sorts of things. Were perfectly aware of which bots are running right now, he says.
Also, Wikipedians are at all times monitoring their bots. People often imagine them as fully autonomous Terminator AI that are kind of floating through the Wikipedia ether and making all these autonomous decisions, says R. Stuart Geiger, a UC Berkeley data scientist whos worked with Wikipedia bots. But for the most part a lot of these bots are relatively simple scripts that a human writes.
A human. Always a human. A bot expresses human ingenuity and human mistakes. The bot and its creator are, in an intimate sense, a hybrid organism. Whenever you read about a bot in Wikipedia, think of that as a human, says Geiger. A human whos got a computer that they never turn off, and theyve got a power tool running on that computer that they can tweak the knobs, they can fiddle the words, they can say they want to replace X with Y.
On the all-too-human front, Yasseris study also found cultural differences among the bot communities of different Wikipedia languages. That was really interesting, because this is the same technology being used just in different environments, and being used by different people, says Yasseri. Why should that lead to a big difference? Bots in the German Wikipedia, for instance, argue relatively infrequently, while Portuguese took the prize for most contentious.
Those differences may seem trivial, but such insight has profound implications as AI burrows deeper and deeper into human society. Imagine how a self-driving car thats adapted to the insanity of the German Autobahn might interact with a self-driving car thats adapted to the relative calm of Portugals roadways. The AI inside each has to make nice or risk killing the occupants. So the different ways bots interact on different versions of Wikipedia could foretell how AI-powered machines get alongor dontin the near future.
And imagine that AI elsewhere on the internet like Twitter makes its way into machines. Bots that spew fake news, that imitate Donald Trump, that harass Trump supporters. Unlike the benevolent bots of Wikipedia, these fool humans into thinking theyre actually people. If you think Wikipedia bots squabbling is problematic, imagine machines with heads full of malevolent AI doing battle.
For now, though, the many bots of Wikipedia collaborate, clash, and keep Squidward in his place.
See original here:
Internet Bots Fight Each Other Because They're All Too Human - WIRED
- AI is eating leftist garbage from Wikipedia and YOU consume what comes out - New York Post - July 24th, 2025 [July 24th, 2025]
- Wikipedia threatens to limit UK access to website - The Telegraph - July 24th, 2025 [July 24th, 2025]
- Pirate Software's Game Heartbound is Under Attack on Steam and Wikipedia - Sports Illustrated - July 24th, 2025 [July 24th, 2025]
- Like Wikipedia, Mastodon now shows a top banner urging you to donate to keep it alive - Neowin - July 24th, 2025 [July 24th, 2025]
- Five members of 11KBW in Wikipedia Online Safety Act challenge - 11KBW - July 24th, 2025 [July 24th, 2025]
- Wiki-Quantities and Wiki-Measurements: Datasets of quantities and their measurement context from Wikipedia - Nature - July 22nd, 2025 [July 22nd, 2025]
- UK online legislation threat to operations,Wikipedia to argue in court - Euronews.com - July 22nd, 2025 [July 22nd, 2025]
- Exclusive | Why Mary-Louise Parker refuses to look at her Wikipedia page: Its bad - Page Six - July 14th, 2025 [July 14th, 2025]
- Opinion: How Wikipedia became one of the greatest inventions of the modern age - The Globe and Mail - July 12th, 2025 [July 12th, 2025]
- The Last of Us Part 2 has a 'chronological mode' now, in case you wanted to play through a story with all the finesse of a Wikipedia plot summary - PC... - July 10th, 2025 [July 10th, 2025]
- Many Wikipedia Articles Are Outdated or Incorrect - Yahoo - July 8th, 2025 [July 8th, 2025]
- Wikipedia Vs. Epistemic Insecurity: Why the World's Most Trusted Website Still Matters 06/30/2025 - MediaPost - July 2nd, 2025 [July 2nd, 2025]
- Mark O'Connell: I love Wikipedia so much, I hardly even minded when it killed me off - The Irish Times - June 29th, 2025 [June 29th, 2025]
- History of Wikipedia - Australian Broadcasting Corporation - June 28th, 2025 [June 28th, 2025]
- 60 Times Wikipedia Articles Were So Scary And Unsettling People Just Had To Know More - Bored Panda - June 24th, 2025 [June 24th, 2025]
- 60 Times Wikipedia Articles Were So Scary And Unsettling People Just Had To Know More - inkl - June 24th, 2025 [June 24th, 2025]
- Wikipedia Is The Latest Place To Join The Daily Gaming Craze - Kotaku - June 22nd, 2025 [June 22nd, 2025]
- Wikipedia Did What No One Expected: This Open Platform Just Proved Its Possible to Fight Back Against Powerful AI Systems - Rude Baguette - June 22nd, 2025 [June 22nd, 2025]
- Terrifying Survey Claims ChatGPT Has Overtaken Wikipedia - futurism.com - May 24th, 2025 [May 24th, 2025]
- Wikipedia wants you to wear your love for an open internet on your sleeve - Fast Company - May 24th, 2025 [May 24th, 2025]
- Wikipedia knew first? What really happened after Portnovs killing in Madrid - Euro Weekly News - May 24th, 2025 [May 24th, 2025]
- Can Wikipedia survive the rise of AI and the age of Donald Trump? - Australian Broadcasting Corporation - May 11th, 2025 [May 11th, 2025]
- Wikipedia fights the UKs flawed and burdensome online safety rules - The Verge - May 10th, 2025 [May 10th, 2025]
- Not courts duty to tell media to delete this and take that down: SC sets aside Delhi HCs order to take down page on ANI vs Wikipedia case - The Indian... - May 10th, 2025 [May 10th, 2025]
- Propaganda tool row: SC reverses Wikipedia takedown in ANI defamation case - Siasat.com - May 10th, 2025 [May 10th, 2025]
- Wikipedia is using (some) generative AI now - The Verge - May 8th, 2025 [May 8th, 2025]
- Jay-Z Accuses Attorney Of Wikipedia Manipulation In Legal Battle - Evrim Aac - May 8th, 2025 [May 8th, 2025]
- US jurist accuses Wikipedia of disseminating propaganda and rewriting history - MSN - May 8th, 2025 [May 8th, 2025]
- Wikipedia Foundation Withdraws Appeal Before Delhi High Court Following Supreme Court Ruling - The Law Advice - May 8th, 2025 [May 8th, 2025]
- Generative AI will help Wikipedia editors moderate, translate, and onboard newcomers - the-decoder.com - May 8th, 2025 [May 8th, 2025]
- Wikipedia will apply generative AI to support editors and reduce technical barriers - The Weekly Journal - May 8th, 2025 [May 8th, 2025]
- Wikipedia turns to generative AI to support its volunteer community - TechSpot - May 8th, 2025 [May 8th, 2025]
- How is Wikipedia Progressive in the Age of AI? - Analytics Insight - May 8th, 2025 [May 8th, 2025]
- Members of Congress call on Wikipedia to curb its antisemitism - Israel National News - May 8th, 2025 [May 8th, 2025]
- Is Wikipedia in trouble? - London Evening Standard - April 12th, 2025 [April 12th, 2025]
- Wikipedia Has an Alter Ego Thats Obsessed With Questions. Everyone Should Browse It. - Slate - April 12th, 2025 [April 12th, 2025]
- ANI vs Wikipedia: What the case is about and what has happened so far - Business Standard - April 12th, 2025 [April 12th, 2025]
- Delhi HC refuses to stay order asking Wikipedia to remove alleged defamatory description of ANI - The Economic Times - April 10th, 2025 [April 10th, 2025]
- The ADL says Wikipedia contains antisemitic bias, amid dispute over how the Israel-Hamas conflict is represented on the site - CNN - March 22nd, 2025 [March 22nd, 2025]
- I Tried a TikTok-Style Version of Wikipedia, and It's Now My Favorite Way of Learning - MUO - MakeUseOf - March 22nd, 2025 [March 22nd, 2025]
- How obscure is prospective Celtics buyer William Chisholm? He didnt have a Wikipedia page until Thursday. - The Boston Globe - March 22nd, 2025 [March 22nd, 2025]
- How biased Wikipedia trashed Trumps nominees after he named them - New York Post - March 22nd, 2025 [March 22nd, 2025]
- Deconstructing Wikipedia: Its biased, lopsided and partisan - The Sunday Guardian - March 22nd, 2025 [March 22nd, 2025]
- ADL report finds clear evidence of anti-Israel bias among Wikipedia editors - JNS.org - March 22nd, 2025 [March 22nd, 2025]
- ADL: Anti-Israel Wikipedia editors colluding in anti-Israel bias on site - The Times of Israel - March 22nd, 2025 [March 22nd, 2025]
- What happens when Wikipedia, Joe Biden, and Ms. Frizzle walk into a reality show? - Queen's Journal - March 22nd, 2025 [March 22nd, 2025]
- Wikipedia posts updated to smear Patel, Hegseth, Gabbard: Watchdog - Washington Examiner - March 22nd, 2025 [March 22nd, 2025]
- John Oliver Marvels at Wikipedia Page of Mel Gibson's Father: Somehow Your Son 'Is Not the Worst Thing About You' - TheWrap - March 22nd, 2025 [March 22nd, 2025]
- Wikipedia disrupted by edit wars to manipulate pages on war in Gaza with at least 14 editors banned: report - New York Post - March 13th, 2025 [March 13th, 2025]
- Volunteer photographers are fixing Wikipedia's terrible celebrity headshots - Engadget - March 13th, 2025 [March 13th, 2025]
- Photographers Are on a Mission to Fix Wikipedia's Famously Bad Celebrity Portraits - 404 Media - March 13th, 2025 [March 13th, 2025]
- Wikipedia roiled with internal strife over page edits about the Middle East - Detroit News - March 13th, 2025 [March 13th, 2025]
- Wikipedia has a huge gender equality problem heres why it matters - The Conversation Indonesia - March 13th, 2025 [March 13th, 2025]
- Wikipedia Co-founder: It's Not Neutral, Needs to Be Investigated - Newsmax - March 13th, 2025 [March 13th, 2025]
- Volunteer Photographers Tackle Terrible Celeb Headshots on Wikipedia - PCMag UK - March 13th, 2025 [March 13th, 2025]
- Bored? Check out the Museum of All Things and dive into Wikipedia in 3D - GamingOnLinux - March 3rd, 2025 [March 3rd, 2025]
- This free interactive museum lets you explore Wikipedia like never before - Digital Trends - March 3rd, 2025 [March 3rd, 2025]
- The Wild World of Wikipedia Speedrunning - LAFM - March 3rd, 2025 [March 3rd, 2025]
- Wikipedia co-founder's open challenge to Musk: Which US govt branches 'paid to edit, monitor, update, lobby' the website? - Business Today - March 3rd, 2025 [March 3rd, 2025]
- Wikipedia co-founder may just have agreed with Elon Musk in his first viral post in a few years - The Times of India - February 27th, 2025 [February 27th, 2025]
- Elon Musk wants to change the name of Wikipedia $1 billion on the table to achieve it - Unin Rayo - February 27th, 2025 [February 27th, 2025]
- Wikipedia is now an endless 3D museum, and admission is free - Rock Paper Shotgun - February 27th, 2025 [February 27th, 2025]
- This slick new service puts ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Wikipedia on the map - Fast Company - February 27th, 2025 [February 27th, 2025]
- From agnostic to believer: Wikipedia co-founder publicly shares his testimony - CHVN Radio - February 27th, 2025 [February 27th, 2025]
- Wikipedia co-founder's request to Donald Trump and Elon Musk to probe the dubious website - OpIndia - February 27th, 2025 [February 27th, 2025]
- User booked for adding content on Chhatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj on Wikipedia - The Times of India - February 27th, 2025 [February 27th, 2025]
- Remove derogatory and objectionable reference from Wikipedia about Sambhaji Maharaj: Fadnavis - Deccan Herald - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- 'There's limit to free speech': Fadnavis orders action against Wikipedia content - The Times of India - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- Why these scientists devote time to editing and updating Wikipedia - Nature.com - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- Elon Musk's 'reminder' to Wikipedia: $1 billion offer for name change to ... still stands; come on, do .. - The Times of India - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- Maharashtra CM directs cyber police to get objectionable content on Sambhaji Maharaj removed from Wikipedia - The Indian Express - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- Elon Musk and Wikipedia are feuding - The Week - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- Wikipedia UnReliable Sources: Case Study How Wikipedia is Rigged to Prevent Balance When It Comes to Religious Articles - World Religion News - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- Behind the Blog: Backdoors and the Miracle of Wikipedia - 404 Media - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- What if TikTok and Wikipedia had a baby? - The Washington Post - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- How Wikipedia Co-Founder Found Faith After 35 Years as a Nonbeliever - Movieguide - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- Wikipedia, Are You Ready? Musk's $1 Billion Name Change Offer Still On - Analytics Insight - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- Remove objectional reference about Sambhaji Maharaj from Wikipedia: Fadnavis - The Hindu - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- Zee 24 TAAS forces Wikipedia to take action on false content about Chhatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj - MediaNews4U - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- Elon Musks $1 Billion Wikipedia Challenge: Reality or Stunt? - The Octant - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]