Hundreds of dedicated Wikipedia volunteers are defying the sexists to write women back into history – Insider
Costa Rica's first female anthropologist, a19th-century Dutch prophetess, and a Turkish migrant worker who set herself on fire in a Hamburg marketplace are just some examples of the over 1,500 women Rosie Stephenson-Goodknight has helped place back into the annals of history.
From Nevada City, California, Stephenson-Goodknight spends hours every day creating Wikipedia articles about inspiring women from years gone by.
She doesn't get paid for this tiring work. The retired health administrator is driven to do this by a persistent belief.
"If I don't stop and do this now, these women will be lost to all of history," she told Insider.
Read more: More US adults use YouTube than any other social media but Facebook reigns supreme among older Americans
Stephenson-Goodknight's desire to bring notable women from out of the shadows is what encouraged her to help establish Wikipedia's "Women In Red."
The project, founded in 2015, is dedicated to redressing the content gender gap on Wikipedia by increasing the number of women's biographies on the website.
This is done by turning 'red links,' marking a Wikipedia page that has not yet been created, into blue links that lead to entries documenting notable women's lives from history.
Hundreds of volunteers worldwide have joined this mission, working tirelessly to create and edit articles that tell the stories of forgotten women.
The project's success means that Women In Red has become a major force in addressing the internet's systemic bias.
The project was inspired by the release of an academic paper in October 2014.
The research, led by social scientists from the Universitat Pompeu Fabra and Yahoo! Labs, found that only 15.5 percent of Wikipedia's biographies were about women or women's issues.
Roger Bamkin, a retired engineer and prolific Wikipedia editor, was astonished by this statistic. "It was a lot better than paper encyclopedias, but it was still embarrassingly low," he told Insider.
Eager to see these numbers change, Bamkin reached out to Stephenson-Goodknight to suggest a solution.
They both knew that a lot of this gender bias could be attributed to the fact that Wikipedia editors are overwhelmingly male. Ninety percent of contributors reported their gender as male, according to a 2018 Wikimedia Foundation survey.
But, Bamkin said, it would take too long to correct this. "My idea was much too important to wait until we got enough women editors," he said.
Instead, the proposal was to encourage editors of all genders and walks of life to volunteer some time by following the red links and creating biographies about women.
Rosie Stephenson-Goodknight, the co-founder of Women In Red, pictured at a WikiConference in November 2019. Victor Grigas/ Wikimedia Commons
"Thankfully, people loved the idea," said Stephenson-Goodknight.
The pair launched their first 'Edit-a-thon' an in-person event where amateur Wikipedia editors came together to socialize and create a vast number of articles about important women from history.
Now, several virtual Edit-a-thons take place every month for Women In Red.
Edit-a-thons encourage volunteers to produce content on certain topics. Some last for a few days. Others are year-long campaigns.
In the past year, Edit-a-thons have focused on creating articles about Black women, women in conflict zones, and Indigenous women.
A continuing project, #1Day1Woman, challenges volunteers to create one article per day about notable women.
An example of one of the 'red lists' used by Women In Red to identify pages that still need to be created. Women In Red/ Wikipedia
Lists of red links are provided as inspiration. The lists are developed in numerous ways; some are crowdsourced, bots accumulate others. "We've created about 800 lists of women missing from history," Stephenson-Goodknight said.
Kate Antiqueight, from Cork, Ireland, is involved in the #1Day1Woman challenge. "I'm trying to reach the end of this year slightly better than I did last year," she told Insider.
Last year, she wrote 199 articles about women. This year, her goal is to get to 365. "
She's committed to the cause because of long-standing frustration with iconic females being ignored. "Women have been airbrushed out of history," she added.
Some volunteers have made creating Wikipedia entries into a full-time job.
"I spend around nine hours a day writing on Wikipedia," a volunteer who goes by 'Susun' told Insider. "I retired 12 years ago and this is what I do, all day."
A Women In Red banner that displays some of the biographies created by volunteers. Victuallers/ Wikimedia Commons
Susun was motivated to participate in Women In Red because she also grew up feeling like women were being erased from history.
"You'd go through a library and there would be all these books about great men in history but there just weren't any about women," she said. "For me, doing this gives young girls the sense that there are other people out there like them and that the possibilities are endless."
Susun requested that Insider withhold her last name because of her fear of harassment online.
"It's a pretty hostile environment, just like any online environment can be for women," she said. "There's a whole group of people that say we're pushing an agenda. It's too feminist, that sort of stuff."
Hannah, a 22-year-old volunteer from Toronto, Canada, also requested that her full name not be identified.
This is because she is concerned about an event that took place last month. A prominent White House photographer took issue with her Wikipedia biography, created by a Women In Redvolunteer, and proceeded to identify and target the creator. She called the volunteer's family, employer, and the police, Hannah said.
Even the co-founder has had issues with cyber harassment.Stephenson-Goodknight received a thinly-veiled rape threat on her Wikipedia Talk page shortly after starting the project, she told Insider.
Aware of this, she has tried to ensure that the Women In Reddiscussions are an "anti-harassment zone."
"Our Talk page is a place where, if someone becomes uncivil, tried to harass an editor or anything, that comment would be immediately dealt with," she said.
Stephenson-Goodknight was awarded co-Wikimedian of the Year in 2016 by Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales. This was, in part, thanks to her efforts to combat harassment on the website.
Stephenson-Goodknight has received many plaudits for her work on Women In Red. In 2018, for example, she was honored with a Serbian knighthood.
Her proudest achievement, however, is playing a part in the creation of approximately 140,000 new Wikipedia articles on women.
This has increased the share of biographies about women from 15.5 percent to 18 percent. Approximately 700,000 of Wikipedia's 3.9 million biographies are now about women, according to Wikipedia's diversity tool Humaniki.
While there is still a long way to go, she said she is pleased with the progress.
"The initial goal was just to move the needle," Stephenson-Goodknight said. "We're not looking to get to 50 percent. We just want to improve from where we were because we know that we can do better."
The founders of Women In Red, Rosie Stephenson-Goodknight and Roger Bamkin, at an event at the University of California Irivine in May 2019. Rosie Stephenson-Goodknight/ Wikimedia Commons
Bamkin agrees. "If you weren't to a princess or a queen before 1820, you pretty much didn't exist in history," he said.
A more attainable goal, therefore, is to reach parity for all living women.
Doing so, Bamkin said, would have significant consequences. "When my granddaughter looks at Wikipedia, she'll see more women role models than she might have done if we hadn't made the effort."
Read this article:
Hundreds of dedicated Wikipedia volunteers are defying the sexists to write women back into history - Insider
- Wikipedia's co-founder on anonymous editors, why the site is biased against conservatives and how to fix it - Fox News - October 11th, 2025 [October 11th, 2025]
- Sen. Cruz Says Wikipedia Has Left-Wing Bias - Broadband Breakfast - October 11th, 2025 [October 11th, 2025]
- The 40: Wesley on the Hunt, Senatorial Polling Trends, and Wikipedia Controversy - The Texan - October 11th, 2025 [October 11th, 2025]
- Wikipedia co-founder Larry Sanger reveals heavy influence of anonymous accounts - Fox News - October 11th, 2025 [October 11th, 2025]
- Wikipedia is one of the last sanctums of information on the internet - martlet.ca - October 11th, 2025 [October 11th, 2025]
- Elon Musk to launch Grokipedia, a Wikipedia competitor. But what's the catch? - Cybernews - October 11th, 2025 [October 11th, 2025]
- Jessica Wade Wrote Thousands of Wikipedia Biographies for Women in STEM - Adafruit - October 9th, 2025 [October 9th, 2025]
- Meet the mystery editor behind most of the Wikipedia pages on South Korea - The Straits Times - October 9th, 2025 [October 9th, 2025]
- Wikipedia must be defended from the onslaught of AI - Diari ARA - October 9th, 2025 [October 9th, 2025]
- Ted Cruz picks a fight with Wikipedia, accusing platform of left-wing bias - Ars Technica - October 7th, 2025 [October 7th, 2025]
- Cruz presses Wikipedia on bias amid growing conservative criticism - The Hill - October 7th, 2025 [October 7th, 2025]
- Cruz presses Wikipedia to address concerns systemic bias is promoting left-wing ideology - Washington Examiner - October 7th, 2025 [October 7th, 2025]
- Meet the mystery editor behind most of the Wikipedia pages on Korea - The Korea Herald - October 7th, 2025 [October 7th, 2025]
- Meet the Physicist Who Wrote Over 2,000 Wikipedia Biographies for Women in STEM - My Modern Met - October 7th, 2025 [October 7th, 2025]
- ConfirmedElon Musk declares war on Wikipedia and creates Grokipedia, an AI-powered alternative developed by xAI - Unin Rayo - October 7th, 2025 [October 7th, 2025]
- Elon Musk launches Grokipedia: The response to Wikipedia arrives in two weeks - Cointribune - October 7th, 2025 [October 7th, 2025]
- Grokipedia: The Coming War with Wikipedia for the World's Knowledge - Hackernoon - October 7th, 2025 [October 7th, 2025]
- Conservatives Slam Wikipedia as 'Woke' And Its Own Co-Founder Agrees: 'It's Been Hijacked by the Left' - International Business Times UK - October 7th, 2025 [October 7th, 2025]
- Elon Musk Unveils Plans for Grokipedia, an Ai-Driven Alternative to Wikipedia - VINnews - October 7th, 2025 [October 7th, 2025]
- The billionaire and the village square: Why both Wikipedia and Grok fall short in an age of epistemic power struggles - The Sunday Guardian - October 7th, 2025 [October 7th, 2025]
- Elon Musks Wikipedia? Grokipedia Version 0.1 Coming Up In 2 Weeks: How Will It Help You? - NDTV Profit - October 7th, 2025 [October 7th, 2025]
- Elon Musk xAI Set to Launch Wikipedia Alternative Grokipedia - TVC News - October 7th, 2025 [October 7th, 2025]
- Europe caves to bullies on speech, Yes, Wikipedia can be fixed and other commentary - New York Post - October 4th, 2025 [October 4th, 2025]
- Wikipedia co-founder says site has liberal bias heres his plan to fix that - Straight Arrow News - SAN - October 4th, 2025 [October 4th, 2025]
- Elon Musk decided to create his alternative to Wikipedia: xAI is already developing it - - October 4th, 2025 [October 4th, 2025]
- I Founded Wikipedia. Heres How to Fix It. - The Free Press - October 2nd, 2025 [October 2nd, 2025]
- Jimmy Kimmel has nothing on Wikipedia when it comes to misinforming people - New York Post - October 2nd, 2025 [October 2nd, 2025]
- The 3 building blocks of trustworthy information: Lessons from Wikipedia - Wikimedia Foundation - October 2nd, 2025 [October 2nd, 2025]
- Tilly Norwood already has a Wikipedia page, and not even the editors are sure what to call it - Fast Company - October 2nd, 2025 [October 2nd, 2025]
- TUCKER CARLSON: WIKIPEDIA'S ANONYMOUS, UNTOUCHABLES ARE SHAPING AMERICANS' UNDERSTANDING Larry Sanger(Co-Founder of Wikipedia): "85% of the most... - October 2nd, 2025 [October 2nd, 2025]
- MAGA Melts Down Over Wikipedia Blacklist - The Daily Beast - October 2nd, 2025 [October 2nd, 2025]
- Elon Musk announces Grokipedia as Wikipedia alternative from xAI - Teslarati - October 2nd, 2025 [October 2nd, 2025]
- Grokipedia will be Elon Musks version of Wikipedia - Notebookcheck - October 2nd, 2025 [October 2nd, 2025]
- Transcript: Wikipedia Co-Creator Larry Sangers Interview on The Tucker Carlson Show - The Singju Post - October 2nd, 2025 [October 2nd, 2025]
- Elon Musk Says xAI Is Building 'Grokipedia' To Replace Wikipedia: 'Will Be A Massive Improvement' - Benzinga - October 2nd, 2025 [October 2nd, 2025]
- Elon Musks Wikipedia Competitor Is Going to Be a Disaster - Gizmodo - October 2nd, 2025 [October 2nd, 2025]
- Elon Musk slams Wikipedia over bias, vows new alternative| RISING - The Hill - October 2nd, 2025 [October 2nd, 2025]
- Elon Musk unveils Grokipedia, a new alternative to Wikipedia - Berawang News - October 2nd, 2025 [October 2nd, 2025]
- Elon Musk Plans to Take on Wikipedia With 'Grokipedia' PCMag - Berawang News - October 2nd, 2025 [October 2nd, 2025]
- Elon Musk announces Grokipedia as Wikipedia alternative from xAI - Berawang News - October 2nd, 2025 [October 2nd, 2025]
- A New Encyclopedia in the Making? Musk Thinks Grok Can Replace Wikipedia Editors - Digital Information World - October 2nd, 2025 [October 2nd, 2025]
- Elon Musk Says xAI Is Building 'Grokipedia' To Replace Wikipedia: 'Will Be A Massive Improvement' - Berawang News - October 2nd, 2025 [October 2nd, 2025]
- Elon Musk is creating his own alternative to Wikipedia based on Grok - Mezha.Media - October 2nd, 2025 [October 2nd, 2025]
- Move over Wikipedia, Elons coming with Grokipedia - The Economic Times - October 2nd, 2025 [October 2nd, 2025]
- Elon Musk Launches Grokipedia by xAI as Wikipedia Alternative - - October 2nd, 2025 [October 2nd, 2025]
- Wikipedia could be included in the teen social media ban. Australian users are worried - Crikey - October 2nd, 2025 [October 2nd, 2025]
- 'Grokipedia': Elon Musk says xAI is working on a Wikipedia rival powered by AI - Mint - October 2nd, 2025 [October 2nd, 2025]
- Elon Musk announced the Grokipedia project as a replacement for Wikipedia - Zamin.uz - October 2nd, 2025 [October 2nd, 2025]
- 2 yrs into failed takeover, Elon Musk announces own Wikipedia - ummid.com - October 2nd, 2025 [October 2nd, 2025]
- What is Grokipedia that Elon Musk is launching to take on rival Wikipedia - Tribune India - October 2nd, 2025 [October 2nd, 2025]
- Fears Of Wikipedia's End Overblown, But Challenges Remain Warn Researchers - Mirage News - October 2nd, 2025 [October 2nd, 2025]
- Enver Hasani: Ibrahim Rugova an extraordinary intellectual, Kurti with Wikipedia knowledge to impress others - Gazeta Express - September 28th, 2025 [September 28th, 2025]
- How AI and Wikipedia have sent vulnerable languages into a doom spiral - MIT Technology Review - September 25th, 2025 [September 25th, 2025]
- How AI and Wikipedia have sent vulnerable languages into a doom spiral - StartupNews.fyi - September 25th, 2025 [September 25th, 2025]
- Hone your Wikipedia editing and contributing skills at this monthly Brixton meetup - Brixton Buzz - September 25th, 2025 [September 25th, 2025]
- Jimmy Kimmel Live(s On), No Thanks To Brands; The Case For Ad-Supported Wikipedia - AdExchanger - September 25th, 2025 [September 25th, 2025]
- How Wikipedia Can Save the Internet With Advertising - Tech Policy Press - September 23rd, 2025 [September 23rd, 2025]
- The right wing is coming for Wikipedia | On Point - WBUR - September 21st, 2025 [September 21st, 2025]
- Keeping information reliable in the digital age: Lessons from Wikipedia - Wikimedia Foundation - September 19th, 2025 [September 19th, 2025]
- Recent attacks on Wikipedia may have more to do with politics than accuracy - NPR - September 15th, 2025 [September 15th, 2025]
- Wikipedia is planning to take down Erika Kirk's page - and the reason why is shockingly brutal - The Tab - September 15th, 2025 [September 15th, 2025]
- In Neurocracy, it's up to you to solve a murder mystery through the internet's greatest resource, Wikipedia - Rock Paper Shotgun - September 13th, 2025 [September 13th, 2025]
- Wikipedia Editors Are Trying To Downplay Details Of Iryna Zarutska's Murder - OutKick - September 11th, 2025 [September 11th, 2025]
- Wikipedia Editors Are Trying To Downplay Details Of Iryna Zarutska's Murder - OutKick - September 11th, 2025 [September 11th, 2025]
- Recent attacks on Wikipedia may have more to do with politics than accuracy - KUOW - September 11th, 2025 [September 11th, 2025]
- Wikipedia Vs The Bengal Files: How politically motivated editors are distorting public perception of the movie - OpIndia - September 9th, 2025 [September 9th, 2025]
- The 10 Giveaway Signs Of AI Writing, Wikipedia Reveals - Forbes - September 9th, 2025 [September 9th, 2025]
- A Woman Was Stabbed to Death on a Train. Wikipedia Might Pretend It Never Happened. - The Free Press - September 9th, 2025 [September 9th, 2025]
- The Terrifying Reality of Wikipedia Bias in an AI World - National Review - September 6th, 2025 [September 6th, 2025]
- Biased Wikipedia Hurls Brickbats at Fox and Newsmax, Bouquets at CNN and MSNBC - The Daily Signal - September 6th, 2025 [September 6th, 2025]
- This self-hosted Wikipedia is wrong about everything, and it's hilarious - xda-developers.com - September 6th, 2025 [September 6th, 2025]
- Wikipedia is under attack and how it can survive - The Verge - September 5th, 2025 [September 5th, 2025]
- The Silent Architects of Wikipedia: How a Tiny Elite Shapes What We Know - Vocal - September 5th, 2025 [September 5th, 2025]
- GOP Investigation Pressures Wikipedia to Reveal Identities of Editors Accused of 'Bias' Against Israel - Common Dreams - August 29th, 2025 [August 29th, 2025]
- With just a Raspberry Pi, you can host your own offline Wikipedia: here's how I did it - xda-developers.com - August 29th, 2025 [August 29th, 2025]
- African science and tech missing from Wikipedia - SciDev.Net - August 29th, 2025 [August 29th, 2025]
- US Lawmakers Launch Investigation Into Wikipedia Over Claims of Systemic Anti-Israel Bias - Algemeiner.com - August 29th, 2025 [August 29th, 2025]
- House Republicans investigate Wikipedia over allegations of bias - Straight Arrow News - August 29th, 2025 [August 29th, 2025]
- House panel probing organized efforts to distort Wikipedia, including entries on Israel - JNS.org - August 29th, 2025 [August 29th, 2025]
- 'We seek your assistance...': US lawmakers wants to investigate Wikipedia over alleged biased entries; se - The Times of India - August 29th, 2025 [August 29th, 2025]