Hundreds of dedicated Wikipedia volunteers are defying the sexists to write women back into history – Insider
Costa Rica's first female anthropologist, a19th-century Dutch prophetess, and a Turkish migrant worker who set herself on fire in a Hamburg marketplace are just some examples of the over 1,500 women Rosie Stephenson-Goodknight has helped place back into the annals of history.
From Nevada City, California, Stephenson-Goodknight spends hours every day creating Wikipedia articles about inspiring women from years gone by.
She doesn't get paid for this tiring work. The retired health administrator is driven to do this by a persistent belief.
"If I don't stop and do this now, these women will be lost to all of history," she told Insider.
Read more: More US adults use YouTube than any other social media but Facebook reigns supreme among older Americans
Stephenson-Goodknight's desire to bring notable women from out of the shadows is what encouraged her to help establish Wikipedia's "Women In Red."
The project, founded in 2015, is dedicated to redressing the content gender gap on Wikipedia by increasing the number of women's biographies on the website.
This is done by turning 'red links,' marking a Wikipedia page that has not yet been created, into blue links that lead to entries documenting notable women's lives from history.
Hundreds of volunteers worldwide have joined this mission, working tirelessly to create and edit articles that tell the stories of forgotten women.
The project's success means that Women In Red has become a major force in addressing the internet's systemic bias.
The project was inspired by the release of an academic paper in October 2014.
The research, led by social scientists from the Universitat Pompeu Fabra and Yahoo! Labs, found that only 15.5 percent of Wikipedia's biographies were about women or women's issues.
Roger Bamkin, a retired engineer and prolific Wikipedia editor, was astonished by this statistic. "It was a lot better than paper encyclopedias, but it was still embarrassingly low," he told Insider.
Eager to see these numbers change, Bamkin reached out to Stephenson-Goodknight to suggest a solution.
They both knew that a lot of this gender bias could be attributed to the fact that Wikipedia editors are overwhelmingly male. Ninety percent of contributors reported their gender as male, according to a 2018 Wikimedia Foundation survey.
But, Bamkin said, it would take too long to correct this. "My idea was much too important to wait until we got enough women editors," he said.
Instead, the proposal was to encourage editors of all genders and walks of life to volunteer some time by following the red links and creating biographies about women.
Rosie Stephenson-Goodknight, the co-founder of Women In Red, pictured at a WikiConference in November 2019. Victor Grigas/ Wikimedia Commons
"Thankfully, people loved the idea," said Stephenson-Goodknight.
The pair launched their first 'Edit-a-thon' an in-person event where amateur Wikipedia editors came together to socialize and create a vast number of articles about important women from history.
Now, several virtual Edit-a-thons take place every month for Women In Red.
Edit-a-thons encourage volunteers to produce content on certain topics. Some last for a few days. Others are year-long campaigns.
In the past year, Edit-a-thons have focused on creating articles about Black women, women in conflict zones, and Indigenous women.
A continuing project, #1Day1Woman, challenges volunteers to create one article per day about notable women.
An example of one of the 'red lists' used by Women In Red to identify pages that still need to be created. Women In Red/ Wikipedia
Lists of red links are provided as inspiration. The lists are developed in numerous ways; some are crowdsourced, bots accumulate others. "We've created about 800 lists of women missing from history," Stephenson-Goodknight said.
Kate Antiqueight, from Cork, Ireland, is involved in the #1Day1Woman challenge. "I'm trying to reach the end of this year slightly better than I did last year," she told Insider.
Last year, she wrote 199 articles about women. This year, her goal is to get to 365. "
She's committed to the cause because of long-standing frustration with iconic females being ignored. "Women have been airbrushed out of history," she added.
Some volunteers have made creating Wikipedia entries into a full-time job.
"I spend around nine hours a day writing on Wikipedia," a volunteer who goes by 'Susun' told Insider. "I retired 12 years ago and this is what I do, all day."
A Women In Red banner that displays some of the biographies created by volunteers. Victuallers/ Wikimedia Commons
Susun was motivated to participate in Women In Red because she also grew up feeling like women were being erased from history.
"You'd go through a library and there would be all these books about great men in history but there just weren't any about women," she said. "For me, doing this gives young girls the sense that there are other people out there like them and that the possibilities are endless."
Susun requested that Insider withhold her last name because of her fear of harassment online.
"It's a pretty hostile environment, just like any online environment can be for women," she said. "There's a whole group of people that say we're pushing an agenda. It's too feminist, that sort of stuff."
Hannah, a 22-year-old volunteer from Toronto, Canada, also requested that her full name not be identified.
This is because she is concerned about an event that took place last month. A prominent White House photographer took issue with her Wikipedia biography, created by a Women In Redvolunteer, and proceeded to identify and target the creator. She called the volunteer's family, employer, and the police, Hannah said.
Even the co-founder has had issues with cyber harassment.Stephenson-Goodknight received a thinly-veiled rape threat on her Wikipedia Talk page shortly after starting the project, she told Insider.
Aware of this, she has tried to ensure that the Women In Reddiscussions are an "anti-harassment zone."
"Our Talk page is a place where, if someone becomes uncivil, tried to harass an editor or anything, that comment would be immediately dealt with," she said.
Stephenson-Goodknight was awarded co-Wikimedian of the Year in 2016 by Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales. This was, in part, thanks to her efforts to combat harassment on the website.
Stephenson-Goodknight has received many plaudits for her work on Women In Red. In 2018, for example, she was honored with a Serbian knighthood.
Her proudest achievement, however, is playing a part in the creation of approximately 140,000 new Wikipedia articles on women.
This has increased the share of biographies about women from 15.5 percent to 18 percent. Approximately 700,000 of Wikipedia's 3.9 million biographies are now about women, according to Wikipedia's diversity tool Humaniki.
While there is still a long way to go, she said she is pleased with the progress.
"The initial goal was just to move the needle," Stephenson-Goodknight said. "We're not looking to get to 50 percent. We just want to improve from where we were because we know that we can do better."
The founders of Women In Red, Rosie Stephenson-Goodknight and Roger Bamkin, at an event at the University of California Irivine in May 2019. Rosie Stephenson-Goodknight/ Wikimedia Commons
Bamkin agrees. "If you weren't to a princess or a queen before 1820, you pretty much didn't exist in history," he said.
A more attainable goal, therefore, is to reach parity for all living women.
Doing so, Bamkin said, would have significant consequences. "When my granddaughter looks at Wikipedia, she'll see more women role models than she might have done if we hadn't made the effort."
Read this article:
Hundreds of dedicated Wikipedia volunteers are defying the sexists to write women back into history - Insider
- The best guide to spotting AI writing comes from Wikipedia - TechCrunch - November 20th, 2025 [November 20th, 2025]
- The difference between Grokipedia and Wikipedia - marketplace.org - November 20th, 2025 [November 20th, 2025]
- 27 Wikipedia Pages So Disturbing They're For Adults Only - BuzzFeed - November 20th, 2025 [November 20th, 2025]
- Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales blows his top and hits da bricks 45 seconds into an interview, shouting 'It's a stupid question!' as he walks offstage -... - November 20th, 2025 [November 20th, 2025]
- Wikipedia Cracks the Code on Spotting AI Writing - The Tech Buzz - November 20th, 2025 [November 20th, 2025]
- Elon Musk, Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales is not pleased with your Wikipedia rival; says: Pretty skepti - Times of India - November 20th, 2025 [November 20th, 2025]
- As Wikipedia Traffic Drops 8%, Experts Say Its Time to Rethink SEO and GEO - DesignRush - November 20th, 2025 [November 20th, 2025]
- I Really, Really, Really, Really, Really, Really, Really, Really, Really, Really, Really, Really Regret Looking At These Creepy Wikipedia Pages -... - November 20th, 2025 [November 20th, 2025]
- Jimmy Wales walks out of interview over dumbest Wikipedia question: Its not a - Times of India - November 20th, 2025 [November 20th, 2025]
- Wikipedia is facing attacks from the White House and Musk. Its founder isn't worried - NPR - November 7th, 2025 [November 7th, 2025]
- We tried Elon Musks Wikipedia clone. Its as racist as youd expect - The Sydney Morning Herald - November 7th, 2025 [November 7th, 2025]
- We tried Elon Musks Wikipedia clone. Its as racist as youd expect - The Sydney Morning Herald - November 7th, 2025 [November 7th, 2025]
- Ranked: The Most Viewed Wikipedia Pages of 2025 (So Far) - Visual Capitalist - November 7th, 2025 [November 7th, 2025]
- Ranked: The Most Viewed Wikipedia Pages of 2025 (So Far) - Visual Capitalist - November 7th, 2025 [November 7th, 2025]
- I Fell Into The Darkest Parts Of Wikipedia And I Want A Refund - BuzzFeed - November 7th, 2025 [November 7th, 2025]
- I Fell Into The Darkest Parts Of Wikipedia And I Want A Refund - BuzzFeed - November 7th, 2025 [November 7th, 2025]
- How Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales may have agreed with Elon Musk that Wikipedia is 'biased' - The Times of India - November 7th, 2025 [November 7th, 2025]
- We tried Elon Musks Wikipedia clone. Its as racist as youd expect - The Age - November 7th, 2025 [November 7th, 2025]
- INSEAD launches Botipedia, an AI-created encyclopedic knowledge portal that claims to be 6,000 times larger than Wikipedia - EdTech Innovation Hub - November 7th, 2025 [November 7th, 2025]
- I tried Elon Musk's Wikipedia clone and boy is it racist - SFGATE - November 5th, 2025 [November 5th, 2025]
- Elon Musk? AI? Crazy left-wing activists? The main who built Wikipedia explains its biggest threats - BBC Science Focus Magazine - November 5th, 2025 [November 5th, 2025]
- Musk version of Wikipedia takes different tack on climate - E&E News by POLITICO - November 5th, 2025 [November 5th, 2025]
- I tried Grokipedia. It has something to teach Wikipedia about AI. - Business Insider - November 3rd, 2025 [November 3rd, 2025]
- Step aside, Wikipedia; its Grok to the future - Washington Times - November 3rd, 2025 [November 3rd, 2025]
- AI answers are taking a bite of Wikipedia's traffic. Should we be worried for the site? - Business Insider - November 3rd, 2025 [November 3rd, 2025]
- Wikipedia sends 'note' to everyone on the internet as it takes on Elon Musk's Grokipedia - The Times of India - November 3rd, 2025 [November 3rd, 2025]
- What Elon Musks Version of Wikipedia Thinks About Hitler, Putin, and Apartheid - The Atlantic - November 3rd, 2025 [November 3rd, 2025]
- I tried Grokipedia, the AI-powered anti-Wikipedia. Here's why neither is foolproof - ZDNET - November 3rd, 2025 [November 3rd, 2025]
- Why Wikipedia Is Losing Traffic to AI Overviews on Google - CNET - November 3rd, 2025 [November 3rd, 2025]
- Grokipedia vs Wikipedia: How Elon Musk's AI-generated encyclopaedia holds up against the left-leaning cro - The Times of India - November 3rd, 2025 [November 3rd, 2025]
- WIKIPEDIA CO-FOUNDER: WIKIPEDIA WILL BE LEFT IN THE DUST BY GROKIPEDIA" Ex-founder of Wikipedia, Larry Sanger: "The neat thing that theyre... - November 3rd, 2025 [November 3rd, 2025]
- How AI could soon be used by Wikipedia, according to its founder - BBC Science Focus Magazine - November 3rd, 2025 [November 3rd, 2025]
- Grokipedia Is the Antithesis of Everything That Makes Wikipedia Good, Useful, and Human - 404 Media - November 3rd, 2025 [November 3rd, 2025]
- Seth Meyers Drags Trump for Having an Entire Wikipedia Page Dedicated to His Handshake Technique | Video - TheWrap - November 3rd, 2025 [November 3rd, 2025]
- Elon Musk Launches AI-Powered Rival to Wikipedia and Its Already Been Accused of Copying Wiki Pages - People.com - November 3rd, 2025 [November 3rd, 2025]
- Wikipedia says AI answers are starting to take a bite. There are reasons to be worried. - Yahoo News Canada - November 3rd, 2025 [November 3rd, 2025]
- What Wikipedia and Grokipedia are saying about each other - KGOU - November 3rd, 2025 [November 3rd, 2025]
- I pitted Wikipedia against Elon Musks new Grokipedia heres which one gave the better answers - Tom's Guide - November 3rd, 2025 [November 3rd, 2025]
- Explained | What is Grokipedia, Musk's AI alternative to human-edited Wikipedia - Deccan Herald - November 3rd, 2025 [November 3rd, 2025]
- AI still cant beat Wikipedia when it comes to integrity - The Observer - November 3rd, 2025 [November 3rd, 2025]
- Elon Musk's 'Grokipedia' cites Wikipedia as a source, even though it's the exact thing he's trying to replace because he thinks it's 'woke' - Fortune - November 3rd, 2025 [November 3rd, 2025]
- WIKIPEDIA TRIED TO ROAST GROKIPEDIA AND COOKED ITS OWN CREDIBILITY In a new fundraising pop-up, Wikipedia throws shade at Grokipedia, bragging it's... - November 3rd, 2025 [November 3rd, 2025]
- Elon Musk wants to dethrone Wikipedia with Grokipedia - MSN - November 3rd, 2025 [November 3rd, 2025]
- Grokipedia: Far right talking points or much-needed antidote to Wikipedia? - TradingView - November 3rd, 2025 [November 3rd, 2025]
- Hi, Its Me, Wikipedia, and I Am Ready for Your Apology - McSweeneys Internet Tendency - October 28th, 2025 [October 28th, 2025]
- Watch Wikipedia Founder Wales Explores Trust in the Digital Age - Bloomberg.com - October 28th, 2025 [October 28th, 2025]
- He co-founded Wikipedia. Now hes inspiring Elon Musk to build a rival. - Yahoo - October 28th, 2025 [October 28th, 2025]
- 'An astonishing situation': Wikipedia co-founder bashes Trump's latest attacks on trust - rawstory.com - October 28th, 2025 [October 28th, 2025]
- Trust and empathy should be baked into tech from the start, says Wikipedia co-founder - marketplace.org - October 28th, 2025 [October 28th, 2025]
- Elon Musks Grokipedia copying Wikipedia? Here's all you need to know about the AI-powered encyclopedia - The Economic Times - October 28th, 2025 [October 28th, 2025]
- Explained: What is Elon Musks Grokipedia and how it differs from Wikipedia - The Federal - October 28th, 2025 [October 28th, 2025]
- Grokipedia Vs Wikipedia: How Is The Elon Musk's AI-Powered Rival Different From The Encyclopedia? - Mashable India - October 28th, 2025 [October 28th, 2025]
- Elon Musks xAI launches AI-powered Grokipedia database to replace Wikipedia - The Hindu - October 28th, 2025 [October 28th, 2025]
- Grokipedia is online: Elon Musk's AI encyclopedia wants to crush Wikipedia - Cointribune - October 28th, 2025 [October 28th, 2025]
- Elon Musks Grokipedia Takes Aim at Wikipedia Truth Revolution or Biased Echo Chamber? - ts2.tech - October 28th, 2025 [October 28th, 2025]
- Elon Musks Version of Wikipedia Is Live. Heres What the Difference Is - Gizmodo - October 28th, 2025 [October 28th, 2025]
- Even Grokipedia needs Wikipedia to exist: Is Elon Musk's AI-powered encyclopedia less biased as he claims? - theweek.in - October 28th, 2025 [October 28th, 2025]
- Elon Musks Wikipedia Alternative Grokipedia Goes Live: Heres How To Use It - NDTV Profit - October 28th, 2025 [October 28th, 2025]
- Cry Us a River: AI Chatbots May Be Killing Wikipedia - Science and Culture Today - October 28th, 2025 [October 28th, 2025]
- Elon Musk launches rival to challenge Wikipedia; Here's all you need to know about this - DNA India - October 28th, 2025 [October 28th, 2025]
- GROKIPEDIA IS ALREADY MORE ACCURATE THAN WIKIPEDIA AND IT SHOWS Grokipedia just proved why it is rewriting how knowledge works online. Look at how it... - October 28th, 2025 [October 28th, 2025]
- Nothing But The Truth: Will Elon Musk's Grokipedia Deal A Death Blow To 'Woke' Wikipedia? - News18 - October 28th, 2025 [October 28th, 2025]
- Grokipedia launched by Elon Musk to take on Wikipedia: Heres how to use it, new AI features, early controversy, and more - financialexpress.com - October 28th, 2025 [October 28th, 2025]
- Grokipedia Debuts: Elon Musks AI-Powered Alternative to Wikipedia - parameter.io - October 28th, 2025 [October 28th, 2025]
- The Wikipedia Page on "Brain Rot" Is Protected Until 2026 Due to Extensive Vandalism - Futurism - October 26th, 2025 [October 26th, 2025]
- 'I was very nervous at first' - how the founder of Wikipedia learnt to embrace trust - RNZ - October 26th, 2025 [October 26th, 2025]
- A Wikipedia cofounder is fueling the rights campaign against it - The Washington Post - October 24th, 2025 [October 24th, 2025]
- Where does Wikipedia go in the age of AI? - Financial Times - October 24th, 2025 [October 24th, 2025]
- Wikipedia co-founder Larry Sangers long-standing claims of liberal bias and mismanagement at the worlds dominant online encyclopedia are being... - October 24th, 2025 [October 24th, 2025]
- Grokipedia was supposed to rival Wikipedia but Elon Musk pulled the plug (for now) - Tom's Guide - October 24th, 2025 [October 24th, 2025]
- Murdaugh: Death In The Family Owes More Than You Think To One Wikipedia Line - Screen Rant - October 24th, 2025 [October 24th, 2025]
- Wikipedia blames ChatGPT for falling traffic and claims bots are stealing its hard work - New York Post - October 24th, 2025 [October 24th, 2025]
- Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales on the crisis of trust in the age of Trump - Channel 4 - October 24th, 2025 [October 24th, 2025]
- Alabama-born co-founder of Wikipedia has a new book coming out this month - AL.com - October 23rd, 2025 [October 23rd, 2025]
- Six weeks after deadline, House panel still awaits bias, Jew-hatred materials from Wikipedia parent - JNS.org - October 23rd, 2025 [October 23rd, 2025]
- The 24 Wikipedia pages for NHL rivalries, ranked by their single wildest passage - The New York Times - October 23rd, 2025 [October 23rd, 2025]
- From clicks to chat: Why Wikipedia sees fewer visitors in the AI era - Gulf News - October 21st, 2025 [October 21st, 2025]
- Wikipedia says AI is causing visitor numbers to plummet - The Independent - October 21st, 2025 [October 21st, 2025]
- Wikipedia says traffic is falling due to AI search summaries and social video - TechCrunch - October 19th, 2025 [October 19th, 2025]
- Wikipedia Conference Disrupted by Gun Threat in NYC - Newsweek - October 19th, 2025 [October 19th, 2025]