Bible – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
"Biblical" redirects here. For the song by Biffy Clyro, see Biblical (song).
The Bible (from Koine Greek , t bibla, "the books") is a canonical collection of texts sacred in Judaism and Christianity. There is no single "Bible" and many Bibles with varying contents exist.[1] The term Bible is shared between Judaism and Christianity, although the contents of each of their collections of canonical texts is not the same. Different religious groups include different books within their Biblical canons, in different orders, and sometimes divide or combine books, or incorporate additional material into canonical books.
The Hebrew Bible, or Tanakh, contains twenty-four books divided into three parts: the five books of the Torah ("teaching" or "law"), the Nevi'im ("prophets"), and the Ketuvim ("writings"). Christian Bibles range from the sixty-six books of the Protestant canon to the eighty-one books of the Ethiopian Orthodox Church canon. The first part of all Christian Bibles is the Old Testament, which contains, at minimum, the twenty-four books of the Hebrew Bible divided into thirty-nine books and ordered differently from the Hebrew Bible. The Catholic Church and Eastern Christian churches also hold certain deuterocanonical books and passages to be part of the Old Testament canon. The second part of the Christian Bible is the New Testament, containing twenty-seven books originally written in Koine Greek, which discuss the teachings and person of Jesus, as well as events in first-century Christianity. The New Testament is divided into the four Canonical gospels, the Acts of the Apostles, twenty-one Epistles or didactic letters, and the Book of Revelation.
By the 2nd century BCE Jewish groups had called the Bible books the "scriptures" and referred to them as "holy," or in Hebrew (Kitvei hakkodesh), and Christians now commonly call the Old and New Testaments of the Christian Bible "The Holy Bible", in Greek ( , t bibla t gia) or "the Holy Scriptures" ( , e Aga Graph).[2] An early 4th-century Septuagint translation of the Hebrew Bible is found in the Codex Vaticanus. Dating from the 8th century, the Codex Amiatinus is the earliest surviving manuscript of the complete Vulgate Bible. The oldest Tanakh manuscript in Hebrew and Aramaic dates to the 10th century CE.[3] The Bible was divided into chapters in the 13th century by Stephen Langton and into verses in the 16th century by French printer Robert Estienne[4] and is now usually cited by book, chapter, and verse.
The Bible is widely considered to be the best selling book of all time,[5] has estimated annual sales of 100 million copies,[6][7] and has been a major influence on literature and history, especially in the West where it was the first mass-printed book. The Gutenberg Bible was the first Bible ever printed using movable type.
The English word Bible is from the Latin biblia, from the same word in Medieval Latin and Late Latin and ultimately from Koine Greek ta biblia "the books" (singular biblion).[8]
Medieval Latin biblia is short for biblia sacra "holy book", while biblia in Greek and Late Latin is neuter plural (gen. bibliorum). It gradually came to be regarded as a feminine singular noun (biblia, gen. bibliae) in medieval Latin, and so the word was loaned as a singular into the vernaculars of Western Europe.[9] Latin biblia sacra "holy books" translates Greek ta biblia ta hagia, "the holy books".[10]
The word itself had the literal meaning of "paper" or "scroll" and came to be used as the ordinary word for "book". It is the diminutive of byblos, "Egyptian papyrus", possibly so called from the name of the Phoenician sea port Byblos (also known as Gebal) from whence Egyptian papyrus was exported to Greece. The Greek ta biblia (lit. "little papyrus books")[11] was "an expression Hellenistic Jews used to describe their sacred books (the Septuagint).[12][13] Christian use of the term can be traced to c. 223 CE.[8] The biblical scholar F.F. Bruce notes that Chrysostom appears to be the first writer (in his Homilies on Matthew, delivered between 386 and 388) to use the Greek phrase ta biblia ("the books") to describe both the Old and New Testaments together.[14]
Professor John K. Riches, in an Oxford University Press introduction to the Bible, explained that "the biblical texts themselves are the result of a creative dialogue between ancient traditions and different communities through the ages",[15] and "the biblical texts were produced over a period in which the living conditions of the writers political, cultural, economic, and ecological varied enormously".[16] Timothy H. Lim, a professor of Hebrew Bible and Second Temple Judaism at the University of Edinburgh, says that the Old Testament is "a collection of authoritative texts of apparently divine origin that went through a human process of writing and editing."[17] He states that it is not a magical book, nor was it literally written by God and passed to mankind. During the solidification of the Hebrew canon (c. 3rd century BCE), the Bible began to be translated into Greek, now referred to as the Septuagint.[18]
In Christian Bibles, the New Testament Gospels were derived from oral traditions (similar to the Hebrew Bible) in a period after Jesus's death:
See more here:
Bible - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- Elon Musk versus Wikipedia continues an age-old battle over truth - Prospect Magazine - December 10th, 2025 [December 10th, 2025]
- Wikipedia is getting in on the yearly wrapped game - The Verge - December 10th, 2025 [December 10th, 2025]
- Wikipedia Has Its Own Version of Wrapped Now, But Theres One Little Problem - Gizmodo - December 10th, 2025 [December 10th, 2025]
- AYENI: Your teachers were wrong about Wikipedia - The Vanderbilt Hustler - December 10th, 2025 [December 10th, 2025]
- Pope Leo XIV among the most viewed and searched on Wikipedia and Google in 2025 - Catholic News Agency - December 10th, 2025 [December 10th, 2025]
- Wikipedia Rolls Out Spotify Wrapped-Style End-of-Year Recap - PCMag - December 10th, 2025 [December 10th, 2025]
- Wikipedia Launches Personal 'Wrapped' Feature to Boost App Downloads - The Tech Buzz - December 10th, 2025 [December 10th, 2025]
- Heres the top 20 list of most-viewed Wikipedia articles in 2025 - FOX 8 News - December 10th, 2025 [December 10th, 2025]
- Wikipedia announces Pope Leo XIV as their 5th most-read profile of 2025 - Rome Reports - December 10th, 2025 [December 10th, 2025]
- The Ultimate Wikipedia Footballer Quiz II: Another bumper edition to test your 2000s baller knowledge - Planet Football - December 10th, 2025 [December 10th, 2025]
- Charlie Kirks wikipedia becomes most-read page of 2025 since assassination - WION - December 10th, 2025 [December 10th, 2025]
- Quit the begging Wikipedia - vocal.media - December 10th, 2025 [December 10th, 2025]
- What were the most-read articles on Wikipedia in 2025? - Euronews.com - December 10th, 2025 [December 10th, 2025]
- This years hottest Wikipedia pages from Charlie Kirk to Severance - PCWorld - December 10th, 2025 [December 10th, 2025]
- Elon Musks Anti-Woke Wikipedia Is Calling Hitler The Fhrer - The Intercept - November 30th, 2025 [November 30th, 2025]
- 50 Times People Found Gems On Wikipedia That Were Too Funny Not To Share (New Pics) - Bored Panda - November 30th, 2025 [November 30th, 2025]
- For Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales, truth has always been a matter of trust | The Excerpt - USA Today - November 30th, 2025 [November 30th, 2025]
- How does the Wikimedia Foundation use donations to Wikipedia? - Wikimedia Foundation - November 30th, 2025 [November 30th, 2025]
- The Interview: How Wikipedia Is Responding to the Culture Wars - The New York Times - November 30th, 2025 [November 30th, 2025]
- For Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales, truth is a matter of trust - USA Today - November 30th, 2025 [November 30th, 2025]
- ShellBot Chat: How to Edit History The Wikipedia Way - Royal Dutch Shell Plc .com - November 30th, 2025 [November 30th, 2025]
- Grok, is this true? Can Elon Musk's Grokipedia compete with Wikipedia? - Mezha - November 30th, 2025 [November 30th, 2025]
- The best guide to spotting AI writing comes from Wikipedia - TechCrunch - November 20th, 2025 [November 20th, 2025]
- The difference between Grokipedia and Wikipedia - marketplace.org - November 20th, 2025 [November 20th, 2025]
- 27 Wikipedia Pages So Disturbing They're For Adults Only - BuzzFeed - November 20th, 2025 [November 20th, 2025]
- Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales blows his top and hits da bricks 45 seconds into an interview, shouting 'It's a stupid question!' as he walks offstage -... - November 20th, 2025 [November 20th, 2025]
- Wikipedia Cracks the Code on Spotting AI Writing - The Tech Buzz - November 20th, 2025 [November 20th, 2025]
- Elon Musk, Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales is not pleased with your Wikipedia rival; says: Pretty skepti - Times of India - November 20th, 2025 [November 20th, 2025]
- As Wikipedia Traffic Drops 8%, Experts Say Its Time to Rethink SEO and GEO - DesignRush - November 20th, 2025 [November 20th, 2025]
- I Really, Really, Really, Really, Really, Really, Really, Really, Really, Really, Really, Really Regret Looking At These Creepy Wikipedia Pages -... - November 20th, 2025 [November 20th, 2025]
- Jimmy Wales walks out of interview over dumbest Wikipedia question: Its not a - Times of India - November 20th, 2025 [November 20th, 2025]
- Wikipedia is facing attacks from the White House and Musk. Its founder isn't worried - NPR - November 7th, 2025 [November 7th, 2025]
- We tried Elon Musks Wikipedia clone. Its as racist as youd expect - The Sydney Morning Herald - November 7th, 2025 [November 7th, 2025]
- We tried Elon Musks Wikipedia clone. Its as racist as youd expect - The Sydney Morning Herald - November 7th, 2025 [November 7th, 2025]
- Ranked: The Most Viewed Wikipedia Pages of 2025 (So Far) - Visual Capitalist - November 7th, 2025 [November 7th, 2025]
- Ranked: The Most Viewed Wikipedia Pages of 2025 (So Far) - Visual Capitalist - November 7th, 2025 [November 7th, 2025]
- I Fell Into The Darkest Parts Of Wikipedia And I Want A Refund - BuzzFeed - November 7th, 2025 [November 7th, 2025]
- I Fell Into The Darkest Parts Of Wikipedia And I Want A Refund - BuzzFeed - November 7th, 2025 [November 7th, 2025]
- How Wikipedia co-founder Jimmy Wales may have agreed with Elon Musk that Wikipedia is 'biased' - The Times of India - November 7th, 2025 [November 7th, 2025]
- We tried Elon Musks Wikipedia clone. Its as racist as youd expect - The Age - November 7th, 2025 [November 7th, 2025]
- INSEAD launches Botipedia, an AI-created encyclopedic knowledge portal that claims to be 6,000 times larger than Wikipedia - EdTech Innovation Hub - November 7th, 2025 [November 7th, 2025]
- I tried Elon Musk's Wikipedia clone and boy is it racist - SFGATE - November 5th, 2025 [November 5th, 2025]
- Elon Musk? AI? Crazy left-wing activists? The main who built Wikipedia explains its biggest threats - BBC Science Focus Magazine - November 5th, 2025 [November 5th, 2025]
- Musk version of Wikipedia takes different tack on climate - E&E News by POLITICO - November 5th, 2025 [November 5th, 2025]
- I tried Grokipedia. It has something to teach Wikipedia about AI. - Business Insider - November 3rd, 2025 [November 3rd, 2025]
- Step aside, Wikipedia; its Grok to the future - Washington Times - November 3rd, 2025 [November 3rd, 2025]
- AI answers are taking a bite of Wikipedia's traffic. Should we be worried for the site? - Business Insider - November 3rd, 2025 [November 3rd, 2025]
- Wikipedia sends 'note' to everyone on the internet as it takes on Elon Musk's Grokipedia - The Times of India - November 3rd, 2025 [November 3rd, 2025]
- What Elon Musks Version of Wikipedia Thinks About Hitler, Putin, and Apartheid - The Atlantic - November 3rd, 2025 [November 3rd, 2025]
- I tried Grokipedia, the AI-powered anti-Wikipedia. Here's why neither is foolproof - ZDNET - November 3rd, 2025 [November 3rd, 2025]
- Why Wikipedia Is Losing Traffic to AI Overviews on Google - CNET - November 3rd, 2025 [November 3rd, 2025]
- Grokipedia vs Wikipedia: How Elon Musk's AI-generated encyclopaedia holds up against the left-leaning cro - The Times of India - November 3rd, 2025 [November 3rd, 2025]
- WIKIPEDIA CO-FOUNDER: WIKIPEDIA WILL BE LEFT IN THE DUST BY GROKIPEDIA" Ex-founder of Wikipedia, Larry Sanger: "The neat thing that theyre... - November 3rd, 2025 [November 3rd, 2025]
- How AI could soon be used by Wikipedia, according to its founder - BBC Science Focus Magazine - November 3rd, 2025 [November 3rd, 2025]
- Grokipedia Is the Antithesis of Everything That Makes Wikipedia Good, Useful, and Human - 404 Media - November 3rd, 2025 [November 3rd, 2025]
- Seth Meyers Drags Trump for Having an Entire Wikipedia Page Dedicated to His Handshake Technique | Video - TheWrap - November 3rd, 2025 [November 3rd, 2025]
- Elon Musk Launches AI-Powered Rival to Wikipedia and Its Already Been Accused of Copying Wiki Pages - People.com - November 3rd, 2025 [November 3rd, 2025]
- Wikipedia says AI answers are starting to take a bite. There are reasons to be worried. - Yahoo News Canada - November 3rd, 2025 [November 3rd, 2025]
- What Wikipedia and Grokipedia are saying about each other - KGOU - November 3rd, 2025 [November 3rd, 2025]
- I pitted Wikipedia against Elon Musks new Grokipedia heres which one gave the better answers - Tom's Guide - November 3rd, 2025 [November 3rd, 2025]
- Explained | What is Grokipedia, Musk's AI alternative to human-edited Wikipedia - Deccan Herald - November 3rd, 2025 [November 3rd, 2025]
- AI still cant beat Wikipedia when it comes to integrity - The Observer - November 3rd, 2025 [November 3rd, 2025]
- Elon Musk's 'Grokipedia' cites Wikipedia as a source, even though it's the exact thing he's trying to replace because he thinks it's 'woke' - Fortune - November 3rd, 2025 [November 3rd, 2025]
- WIKIPEDIA TRIED TO ROAST GROKIPEDIA AND COOKED ITS OWN CREDIBILITY In a new fundraising pop-up, Wikipedia throws shade at Grokipedia, bragging it's... - November 3rd, 2025 [November 3rd, 2025]
- Elon Musk wants to dethrone Wikipedia with Grokipedia - MSN - November 3rd, 2025 [November 3rd, 2025]
- Grokipedia: Far right talking points or much-needed antidote to Wikipedia? - TradingView - November 3rd, 2025 [November 3rd, 2025]
- Hi, Its Me, Wikipedia, and I Am Ready for Your Apology - McSweeneys Internet Tendency - October 28th, 2025 [October 28th, 2025]
- Watch Wikipedia Founder Wales Explores Trust in the Digital Age - Bloomberg.com - October 28th, 2025 [October 28th, 2025]
- He co-founded Wikipedia. Now hes inspiring Elon Musk to build a rival. - Yahoo - October 28th, 2025 [October 28th, 2025]
- 'An astonishing situation': Wikipedia co-founder bashes Trump's latest attacks on trust - rawstory.com - October 28th, 2025 [October 28th, 2025]
- Trust and empathy should be baked into tech from the start, says Wikipedia co-founder - marketplace.org - October 28th, 2025 [October 28th, 2025]
- Elon Musks Grokipedia copying Wikipedia? Here's all you need to know about the AI-powered encyclopedia - The Economic Times - October 28th, 2025 [October 28th, 2025]
- Explained: What is Elon Musks Grokipedia and how it differs from Wikipedia - The Federal - October 28th, 2025 [October 28th, 2025]
- Grokipedia Vs Wikipedia: How Is The Elon Musk's AI-Powered Rival Different From The Encyclopedia? - Mashable India - October 28th, 2025 [October 28th, 2025]
- Elon Musks xAI launches AI-powered Grokipedia database to replace Wikipedia - The Hindu - October 28th, 2025 [October 28th, 2025]
- Grokipedia is online: Elon Musk's AI encyclopedia wants to crush Wikipedia - Cointribune - October 28th, 2025 [October 28th, 2025]
- Elon Musks Grokipedia Takes Aim at Wikipedia Truth Revolution or Biased Echo Chamber? - ts2.tech - October 28th, 2025 [October 28th, 2025]
- Elon Musks Version of Wikipedia Is Live. Heres What the Difference Is - Gizmodo - October 28th, 2025 [October 28th, 2025]
- Even Grokipedia needs Wikipedia to exist: Is Elon Musk's AI-powered encyclopedia less biased as he claims? - theweek.in - October 28th, 2025 [October 28th, 2025]
- Elon Musks Wikipedia Alternative Grokipedia Goes Live: Heres How To Use It - NDTV Profit - October 28th, 2025 [October 28th, 2025]