The ‘What About Ukraine?’ Defense of Trump Jr.’s Russia Meeting – The Atlantic
Before welcoming Donald Trump Jr. onto his show on Tuesday, Sean Hannity boiled down his defense of the presidents son to one word: Ukraine. In obsessing over whether Trumps campaign colluded with Russian officials to interfere in the 2016 presidential electionand most recently whether it was ethical and legal for Trump Jr. to meet with a Russian lawyer in the hope of obtaining damaging information about Hillary Clinton from the KremlinDemocrats and journalists have completely ignored an example of actual election interference, the Fox News host fumed.
A Democratic National Committee operative and Ukrainian government officials tried to aid and assist Hillary Clinton and damage Donald Trump, Hannity said, and the fact that nobody is talking about it demonstrates that the media is hysterical about Russia, hypocritical in its outrage, and hopelessly in the tank for the Democrats. The Ukraine rebuttal has been ricocheting across right-wing media in recent days, advanced by Trump aides such as Sebastian Gorka and Sarah Sanders and commentators like Rush Limbaugh and Kayleigh McEnany.
Despite this weeks revelations, theres still not a syllable, theres not a vowel, theres not a consonant of evidence that Trump colluded with the Russians to boost his candidacy, Limbaugh declared on his radio show. And yet the Democrats collusion with the Ukrainians is written out in complete sentences for all to see: We know for a fact that Ukraine did try to help Hillary sabotage Trump, Limbaugh said.
The Everybody-Does-It Defense of Collusion
So what precisely do we know about the Ukraine scandal that nobodys heard of? How does it compare to the Russia case and what lessons does the comparison offer for where benign foreign involvement in elections ends and malignant foreign interference begins?
The ur-text for the Ukraine counterargument is a Politico report from January headlined, Ukrainian efforts to sabotage Trump backfire. The investigation details three distinct ways in which Ukrainian officials allegedly assisted Hillary Clintons campaign.
The Political Operative
The first involves the Ukrainian American political operative Alexandra Chalupa. As a paid consultant to the Democratic National Committee, Chalupa was tasked with something unrelated to Ukraine: helping the party reach out to various ethnic groups in the United States. But during her time in that role, which ended after the Democratic convention in July, she was also immersed in a side project: investigating Paul Manafort, Trumps onetime campaign chairman, and the work he did advising the former pro-Russian Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych. Politico reports that as part of this effort, Chalupa cultivated a network of sources in Ukraine and the United States, including investigative journalists, government officials, and private intelligence operatives. She occasionally shared her findings with officials from the DNC and Clintons campaign and voiced her concerns about Manaforts Russia ties with Ukraines ambassador to the United States, Valeriy Chaly, during a meeting at the Ukrainian Embassy.
A DNC official told Politico that the party didnt incorporate Chalupas findings into its opposition research on Trump, and the Ukrainian Embassy has denied involvement in Chalupas inquiry. But relying on the account of a former Ukrainian Embassy staffer and several anonymous sources, Politico sketched out a triangle of interactions between Chalupa, the DNC, and the Ukrainian Embassyone based on apparent sympathy with Chalupas research project, if not outright coordination:
[T]he former DNC staffer and the operative familiar with the situation agreed that with the DNCs encouragement, Chalupa asked embassy staff to try to arrange an interview in which [Ukrainian President Petro] Poroshenko might discuss Manaforts ties to Yanukovych.
While the embassy declined that request, officials there became helpful in Chalupas efforts, she said, explaining that she traded information and leads with them. If I asked a question, they would provide guidance, or if there was someone I needed to follow up with. But she stressed, There were no documents given, nothing like that.
Politico uncovered little concrete evidence of Chalupas work having a major impact on the presidential campaign. Her attempt to launch a congressional investigation into the Trump campaigns connections with Russia didnt succeed. She served as a resource to journalists investigating Manafort but, as Politico noted, its not uncommon for outside operatives to serve as intermediaries between governments and reporters.
The Corruption Investigation
What had a greater impact on the campaign, according to Politico, was the decision by a Ukrainian anti-corruption agency to investigate a ledger that allegedly showed millions of dollars in off-the-books payments to Manafort when he was serving as a political adviser to Yanukovychand the decision by one Ukrainian lawmaker in particular, Serhiy Leshchenko, to publicize the probe. News of the ledger and the investigation made its way into The New York Times and the Clinton campaigns talking points about Trumps troubling relationship with Russia, and Manafort soon resigned as Trumps campaign chief amid the fallout from these revelations and other reports of his activities in Ukraine.
The Ukrainian president has denied targeting Manafort (the government agency conducting the investigation is independent of the presidents office). But Leshchenko, a member of the presidents political bloc, admitted at the time that one of his goals in raising alarms about Manafort was to expose Trump as a pro-Russian candidate who can break the geopolitical balance in the world by allying with Moscow rather than longtime U.S. allies like Ukraine. And, as Politico notes, the investigation into the payments listed in the ledgerwhich in April were partially corroborated by the AP through wire transfers that Manafort claimed were legitimatemysteriously faded after the U.S. election, raising questions about whether Ukrainian officials aired concerns about Manafort less to root out corruption than to undermine the Trump campaign.
The Public Criticism
The third way Ukrainian officials sought to influence the election is the most explicit and straightforward: A number of them made their preferences known. The Interior Minister Arsen Avakov, for example, dismissed Trump as a dangerous marginal. Ukrainian Ambassador Valeriy Chaly may deny collaborating with Alexandra Chalupa on her Manafort research, but he cant exactly distance himself from an op-ed he wrote in The Hill in response to candidate Trumps suggestion that he might recognize Russias annexation of the Ukrainian territory of Crimea.
Trumps remarks, Chaly wrote at the time, call for appeasement of an aggressor and support the violation of a sovereign countrys territorial integrity and anothers breach of international law. In the eyes of the world, such comments seem alien to a country seen by partners as a strong defender of democracy and international order.
* * *
The public critiques of Trump by Chaly and other Ukrainian officials were arguably unwise and unconventional from a diplomatic perspective, but theyre not all that different from German Chancellor Angela Merkel praising Hillary Clinton or Russian President Vladimir Putin calling Trump bright as they maneuvered to defend their interests in the presidential race. Such foreign involvement in elections is to be expected in a country whose politics is as internationally consequential as Americas.
Where things get more complicated is in comparing the specifics of the Russia and Ukraine casesat least to the extent that we understand them so far. In both cases, a foreign government appears to have influenced the U.S. election in significant but ultimately unquantifiable ways. The Ukrainian government announced an investigation that contributed to the downfall of Trumps campaign chief, while the Russian government is thought to have spread fake news and hacked and distributed Democratic Party emails that helped shape the political debate in the final stretch of the presidential campaign.
But there are also critical differences in the nature of the influence exercised by these governments: It remains unclear, for instance, whether the Ukrainian investigation into Manafort was expressly designed to weaken Trump, whereas U.S. intelligence agencies have concluded with confidence that Russias cyber campaign was intended to hurt Clinton and help Trump. The Russians stealthily dealt in stolen emails, the Ukrainians in evidence collected as part of a public investigation. The Ukrainian probe has been linked to a government agency and a crusading lawmaker, but not to the president himself; the Russian campaign seems to have been directed from Vladimir Putin on down. The Ukraine story involves one government investigation and one womans side project; the Russia story involves, as The New York Times once described it, a foreign government-sponsored cyberespionage and information-warfare campaign to disrupt an election without precedent in American history.
As Kenneth Vogel, one of the journalists who wrote the original Politico article, noted on Twitter on Wednesday, overall Russian govt effort to sabotage Hillary/boost Trump was obviously MUCH MORE CONCERTED than anything done by anyone in the Ukrainian govt.
The Ukrainian operation was pretty small beer. It just didnt rise to the level of the Russian influence campaign, David Stern, a Ukraine-based journalist and the co-author with Vogel of the Politico article, told me. I think were dealing in very broad strokes with something similar, but when you get into the details, theyre totally different situations.
In terms of collusion between U.S. political operatives and a foreign government, the evidence is mixed in both instances. In the case of Russia, the clearest indication of collusion so far is Donald Trump Jr.s eagerness to meet with a Russian lawyer who he thought had dirt on Clinton from the Russian government. Here was a figure at the highest reaches of the Trump campaign seeking out opposition research from a purported representative of a U.S. adversary. Based on what we know so far, however, the meeting didnt produce further collaboration between the parties. Relative to Trump Jr., Chalupa was a lower-level operative with a far more tenuous connection to the presidential campaign she was associated with. But she claims to have received tangible help from actual government officials (albeit U.S. allies), not merely the promise of help from figures with apparent ties to that government.
As far as the law is concerned, in contrast to what Trump Jr.s emails reveal, there is not clear evidence of the Clinton campaign coordinating with a foreign national or encouraging or accepting their help, Lawrence Noble of the Campaign Legal Center told The Washington Post this week. If the Ukrainian government did oppo[sitional] research in coordination with the Clinton campaign or the DNC and they knowingly accepted the information, there is a possible [illegal] foreign national contribution. But if Chalupa was gathering the information and passing it on, the question is who did the work and what did the Clinton campaign and DNC know.
Yet the Trump Jr. meeting doesnt constitute a clear-cut violation of the law either. In arguing that it would be a stretch to construe Trump Jr.s meeting with the Russian lawyer as a prohibited solicitation by a campaign of something of value from a foreign national, the legal scholar Jonathan Turley cited Chalupas alleged work with Ukrainian officials as a similarly ambiguous case. It is common for foreign governments to withhold or take actions to influence elections in other countries, he wrote. Information is often shared through various channels during elections from lobbyists, non-government organizations, and government officials.
While the scale of the Russian influence campaign may dwarf that of the Ukrainian campaign, the difficulty in each case of defining what constitutes improper collusion or illegal engagement with a foreign government is instructive, as are the Trump camps efforts this week to trot out other examples of foreign interference in the electionsuch as the Chinese ambassador to the U.S. requesting a private meeting with Clinton campaign officials. Surveying trends such the flood of money into politics and the increasing sophistication of technologies to exert political influence, the law professor Zephyr Teachout wrote in 2009 that Given the global impact of United States policy, twenty years from now massive efforts to influence United States electionsfrom outside its borderswill be routine. Turns out we didnt have to wait 20 years. Were already seeing how varied those efforts can be.
As Stern put it to me: Weve had these debates about foreign governments trying to influence [U.S. elections] for a while now, havent we? The question is: Whats acceptable? One does recognize that there will be an attempt [to influence elections]. The question is how that attempt is metwhether its greeted, whether its flat-out rejected. How high on the food chain does it go?
Read more:
The 'What About Ukraine?' Defense of Trump Jr.'s Russia Meeting - The Atlantic
- What Is a Tomahawk Missile and How Can It Help Ukraine - UNITED24 Media - July 16th, 2025 [July 16th, 2025]
- Ukraine wing of US-founded terrorist group says it was involved in killing of intelligence officer in Kyiv - The Guardian - July 16th, 2025 [July 16th, 2025]
- Trump is signaling a change on Ukraine. What does it mean for Putin?: ANALYSIS - ABC News - Breaking News, Latest News and Videos - July 16th, 2025 [July 16th, 2025]
- How Much Military Aid Has the U.S. Given to Ukraine? Heres What to Know. - The New York Times - July 16th, 2025 [July 16th, 2025]
- Trump touts weapon sales to NATO for Ukraine and threatens Russia with 100% tariffs - NPR - July 16th, 2025 [July 16th, 2025]
- Trump defends giving Putin '50 days' to make peace with Ukraine - ABC News - Breaking News, Latest News and Videos - July 16th, 2025 [July 16th, 2025]
- Trump says not looking to deliver long-range missiles to Ukraine, even as offensive weapons remain on table - CNN - July 16th, 2025 [July 16th, 2025]
- Polish factory in Ukraine targeted by Russian drones, Poland says - Euronews.com - July 16th, 2025 [July 16th, 2025]
- As Trump turns toward Ukraine, Russians wonder if an opportunity was missed - The Washington Post - July 16th, 2025 [July 16th, 2025]
- A timeline of Trumps quotes, shifts and U-turns on Russia and Ukraine - The Washington Post - July 16th, 2025 [July 16th, 2025]
- Trump sending weapons to Ukraine, threatens 'severe tariffs' against Russia if ceasefire deal not reached in 50 days - ABC News - Breaking News,... - July 16th, 2025 [July 16th, 2025]
- Whats behind Trumps shift on arming Ukraine and his threats against Russia - PBS - July 16th, 2025 [July 16th, 2025]
- Russia launches fresh volley of deadly drone attacks on Ukraine in open defiance of Trump threat - New York Post - July 16th, 2025 [July 16th, 2025]
- Exclusive: Putin, unfazed by Trump, will fight on and could take more of Ukraine - Reuters - July 16th, 2025 [July 16th, 2025]
- U.S. citizen who helped Russia from inside Ukraine granted passport by Putin - NBC News - July 16th, 2025 [July 16th, 2025]
- At least 15 injured in Russian attack targeting energy infrastructure in Ukraine - AP News - July 16th, 2025 [July 16th, 2025]
- Trump threatens Russia with tariffs and boosts US weapons for Ukraine - AP News - July 16th, 2025 [July 16th, 2025]
- Ukraine Will Get U.S. Weapons in a New Way. Heres What We Know. - The New York Times - July 16th, 2025 [July 16th, 2025]
- EU tells Trump to share the burden of sending Patriots to Ukraine - politico.eu - July 16th, 2025 [July 16th, 2025]
- Russia attacks Ukraine with hundreds of drones, energy infrastructure hit - USA Today - July 16th, 2025 [July 16th, 2025]
- How Will Putin React to Trump's Ukraine Pivot? Newsweek Contributors Debate - Newsweek - July 16th, 2025 [July 16th, 2025]
- Three Years of War in Ukraine: Are Sanctions Against Russia Making a Difference? - Council on Foreign Relations - July 16th, 2025 [July 16th, 2025]
- Ukraine eyes building its own private military companies their role, legal framework remain unclear - The Kyiv Independent - July 16th, 2025 [July 16th, 2025]
- In reversal, Trump arms Ukraine and threatens sanctions on countries that buy Russian oil - Reuters - July 16th, 2025 [July 16th, 2025]
- Trump Reluctantly Comes Around to Backing Ukraine. Will He Stick With It? - The New York Times - July 16th, 2025 [July 16th, 2025]
- What is the Patriot missile system and how is it helping Ukraine? - Reuters - July 16th, 2025 [July 16th, 2025]
- Is This a Trump Turnaround on Ukraine? - The Bulwark - July 16th, 2025 [July 16th, 2025]
- Trump threatens tariffs targeting Russia without deal to end Ukraine war in 50 days - CBS News - July 16th, 2025 [July 16th, 2025]
- Trump does deal with Nato allies to arm Ukraine and warns Russia of severe sanctions - The Guardian - July 16th, 2025 [July 16th, 2025]
- Russia warns Trumps new pledge of aid to Ukraine could hinder any peace deal - France 24 - July 16th, 2025 [July 16th, 2025]
- North Korea pledges to 'unconditionally support' Russia's war in Ukraine - ABC News - Breaking News, Latest News and Videos - July 14th, 2025 [July 14th, 2025]
- Senators tout Russia sanctions bill as sledgehammer for Trump to end war in Ukraine - CNN - July 14th, 2025 [July 14th, 2025]
- Trump says US will send Patriot missiles to Ukraine: 'They desperately need' them - USA Today - July 14th, 2025 [July 14th, 2025]
- What if Ukraine falls? This is no longer a hypothetical question and it must be answered urgently | Simon Tisdall - The Guardian - July 14th, 2025 [July 14th, 2025]
- Ukraine must get ready for future in which there is no ceasefire with Russia - The Guardian - July 14th, 2025 [July 14th, 2025]
- Russia, China discuss Ukraine war and ties with the United States - Reuters - July 14th, 2025 [July 14th, 2025]
- Report: Trump to announce aggressive plan to arm Ukraine with offensive weapons - The Times of Israel - July 14th, 2025 [July 14th, 2025]
- Sen. Lindsey Graham says sanctions bill would give Trump a "sledgehammer" against Russia amid "turning point" in war with Ukraine... - July 14th, 2025 [July 14th, 2025]
- North Korea's Kim, hosting Lavrov, says he will support Russia to resolve Ukraine war - Reuters - July 14th, 2025 [July 14th, 2025]
- Ukraine's security agency says it killed Russian agents suspected of gunning down its officer - Yahoo - July 14th, 2025 [July 14th, 2025]
- U.S. and Russia have exchanged new ideas for Ukraine peace talks, Rubio says - PBS - July 14th, 2025 [July 14th, 2025]
- Trump very disappointed in Putin as he vows to send Ukraine Patriot missiles ahead of meeting with NATO boss - The Independent - July 14th, 2025 [July 14th, 2025]
- Trump says US will send Patriot missiles to Ukraine, EU will pay for them - The Times of Israel - July 14th, 2025 [July 14th, 2025]
- Archbishop Gudziak: Walking the Way of the Cross with Ukraine - Vatican News - July 14th, 2025 [July 14th, 2025]
- Trump says US will send Patriot missiles to Ukraine - The Kyiv Independent - July 14th, 2025 [July 14th, 2025]
- Trump announces US will send Patriot missiles to Ukraine, says Putin talks nice but then he bombs everybody in the evening - New York Post - July 14th, 2025 [July 14th, 2025]
- A Landscape of Death: Whats Left Where Ukraine Invaded Russia - The New York Times - July 12th, 2025 [July 12th, 2025]
- Ukraine-Russia war latest: Trump to send weapons to Kyiv after Putins forces kill two in drone attack - The Independent - July 12th, 2025 [July 12th, 2025]
- Russia attacks west Ukraine with drones and missiles, kills two - Reuters - July 12th, 2025 [July 12th, 2025]
- Trump said he'd end Ukraine war in 24 hours. Now his patience with Putin is wearing thin. - USA Today - July 12th, 2025 [July 12th, 2025]
- US is selling weapons to NATO allies to give to Ukraine, Trump says - AP News - July 12th, 2025 [July 12th, 2025]
- Russia Intensifies Its Air War in Ukraine - NPR - July 12th, 2025 [July 12th, 2025]
- Trump expected to deliver weapons to Ukraine through Nato allies - The Guardian - July 12th, 2025 [July 12th, 2025]
- 2 dead as Russia attacks Ukraine overnight with almost 600 drones, Kyiv says - ABC News - Breaking News, Latest News and Videos - July 12th, 2025 [July 12th, 2025]
- Senate Backs Ukraine Aid In Draft Military Spending Bill Ahead Of Trump's Statement On Russia - Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty - July 12th, 2025 [July 12th, 2025]
- Trump Says NATO Countries Will Buy Weapons to Give to Ukraine - The New York Times - July 12th, 2025 [July 12th, 2025]
- Senators want safeguards on Hegseth meddling with Ukraine aid in new defense bill - USA Today - July 12th, 2025 [July 12th, 2025]
- How do Russians think the war in Ukraine will end? - BBC - July 12th, 2025 [July 12th, 2025]
- Russia-Ukraine war: What are frustrated Trumps next options with Putin? - Al Jazeera - July 12th, 2025 [July 12th, 2025]
- Rubio slams Russia over 'lack of progress' toward peace in Ukraine - Politico - July 12th, 2025 [July 12th, 2025]
- U.S. weapons flowing again to Ukraine, but not fast enough to stop Russia's drone and missile strikes - CBS News - July 12th, 2025 [July 12th, 2025]
- Putins war in Ukraine may cost him control of the south Caucasus - The Economist - July 12th, 2025 [July 12th, 2025]
- Trump says he struck deal to send US weapons to Ukraine through NATO - CNN - July 12th, 2025 [July 12th, 2025]
- Putin Escalates His War Against Ukraine, Undeterred by Trumps Words - The New York Times - July 12th, 2025 [July 12th, 2025]
- 'Russia's tactic is obvious' Shahed drone 'terror' now reaches all of Ukraine - The Kyiv Independent - July 12th, 2025 [July 12th, 2025]
- Conference commits over 10 bln euros to Ukraine rebuilding, Italy says - Reuters - July 12th, 2025 [July 12th, 2025]
- Russian drone and cruise missile attacks kill at least 2 in Ukraine - AP News - July 12th, 2025 [July 12th, 2025]
- Rubio says US and Russia have exchanged new ideas for Ukraine peace talks - AP News - July 12th, 2025 [July 12th, 2025]
- Leonardo may offer drone tech but has no plans for plant in Ukraine, CEO tells paper - Reuters - July 12th, 2025 [July 12th, 2025]
- Trump resumes weapons deliveries to Ukraine - politico.eu - July 10th, 2025 [July 10th, 2025]
- Russia batters Ukraine with more than 700 drones, the largest barrage of the war, officials say - AP News - July 10th, 2025 [July 10th, 2025]
- Unhappy with Putin, Trump and Congress move closer to Ukraine - The Washington Post - July 10th, 2025 [July 10th, 2025]
- Trump unloads on Putin after promising more military aid to Ukraine - NBC News - July 10th, 2025 [July 10th, 2025]
- Chinese father and son detained in Ukraine, accused of trying to smuggle out info on guided missile system - CBS News - July 10th, 2025 [July 10th, 2025]
- Ukraine's Zelenskiy to hold more meetings with US officials in Rome - Reuters - July 10th, 2025 [July 10th, 2025]
- Largest Russian Long-Range Drone Onslaught Of The War Rains Down On Ukraine - The War Zone - July 10th, 2025 [July 10th, 2025]
- Italy opens Ukraine rebuilding conference as doubts of US defense help remain - AP News - July 10th, 2025 [July 10th, 2025]
- Russia launches largest drone attack on Ukraine as Kyiv pushes US for air defense aid - ABC News - Breaking News, Latest News and Videos - July 10th, 2025 [July 10th, 2025]
- Trump Asked About Not Knowing Who Paused Ukraine Weapons: 'I Would Know' - Newsweek - July 10th, 2025 [July 10th, 2025]
- 'Trump should fire him': Jeffries reacts to Hegseth reportedly pausing Ukraine weapons - CNN - July 10th, 2025 [July 10th, 2025]