Mediaboss Marketing

(Left to right: Andrew T Warman; courtesy of Marian Jones)

Subscribe now for as little as $2 a month!

Subscribe now for as little as $2 a month!

Subscribe now for as little as $2 a month!

Sarah Leonard and Marian Jones met at the Democratic Socialists of Americas socialist-feminist reading group (held in The Nations conference room!) in 2017, after Donald Trumps election prompted a surge in membership in the 40-year-old organization. Now, along with several other editors and an art director, they are members of the Lux collective, named for the revolutionary Rosa Luxemburg. The first issue of its print magazine hits mailboxes this month. I spoke with Leonard and Jones about the future of left feminism, solidarity versus sisterhood, and why Lux is a glossy.

Emily Douglas

ED: Your mission statement argues that girlboss ideology has failed. Why did feminists let go of girlboss ideology?

SL: The girlboss model just doesnt work for most people. The way American inequality looks now, there are a few people at the top, then those peoples lawyers and doctors, and then theres a massive gap, and then theres everybody else. The aspirational character of girlboss-ism is not as true to peoples lives at this point, if it ever was.

ED: Is Lux trying to elevate womens class consciousness?

MJ: There were periods within the feminist movement when people would try to adopt the slogan Sisterhood is powerful and [the idea that] were all in this together, but Black women and other women of color felt like their own needs were getting erased. One of the ways that Black feminists have historically pushed back on sisterhood is the idea that were all victims of the same thing. If youre a white woman, solidarity calls on you to be aware of the way that youre victimized by white supremacy, but also of the way that youre complicit in it.

SL: As feminists, we think in terms of solidarity rather than sisterhood, because we dont necessarily think theres anything organic about all women coming together. You have to build solidarity with intent and build relationships. We refer often in our editorial note to the Combahee River Collective Statement, and one of the reasons we refer to it constantly is that they wereand remain, for that mattervery serious about building points of solidarity with different groups who they had political goals in common with but were different from.Current Issue

Subscribe today and Save up to $129.

This magazine is designed to be part of that project. We imagine a particular kind of constituency thats made up of all of these solidarities that are feminist, abolitionist, queer, and socialist. And to us, that creates an extremely big world, a very big constituency [with] lots of alliances. Different pieces of identity [act] as bridges to other groups rather than barriers.

Womenand Im going to say women, but Im always anxious about hammering too hard on women because we have a very queer and expansive definition of our constituencyare an under-organized constituency. You see that in the fact that this country has an absolute childcare and eldercare crisis. Basically, all of that work is done by women. Everybody knows this as a crisis, and its not a priority anywhere.

ED: For the past decade or more, progressives and leftists have been repositioning issues like abortion, child care, and reproductive health as economic issues. What is still missing from that conversation?

SL: Whenever the Koch brothers put money behind an opponent of abortion and get that person elected, they get a tax cut, because thats what Republicans do. And we pay for that with our bodies and our lives. And to be clear, obviously, the people whose bodies are being sacrificed are poor and working-class women and, disproportionately, women of color.

If you like this article, please give today to help fund The Nations work.

Ideas about morality in the family serve capital in very specific ways. All of the things that politicians dont want to pay for, they say, Its a family problem. So, unless we push back against the idea that the nuclear family is the home of all morality, were never going to win on economics.

Why did Sandra Fluke get called a slut? It was to defeat a universal health care program.

ED: The family is always the prop that has to stand in when social policy fails.

SL: Socialist feminists have always been big on problematizing labors of love. [The feminist campaign] Wages for Housework is all about trying to provoke people into thinking: What is love? What is work? When does one disguise the other?

We have this incredible piece in the first issue thats a new translation of a manifesto about abortion from one of the founders of Wages for Housework, Maria Rosa de la Costa. It is just dripping with contempt for the state and its institutions that are so neglectful and unable to support the society and, especially, women and children. And they say things like, We will put as many children on this earth if we want to, but only when we want to. And we want to raise them in beautiful, comfortable circumstances.

So, theyre making a demand, which is that its sort of pathetic to run a society on bare survival. And, in fact, there should be a level of abundance and pleasure and the ability to raise a family however you want. It has a lot in common in with some language of the reproductive justice movement in the States, some years later.

Wages for Housework is pointing out that if women, in their case, in the household were not doing the reproductive labor of cooking, cleaning, having children, the capitalist system would cease to function. It would end. Capitalism owes a debt to all these unwaged workers who are half the population.

ED: You write that Luxs vision of feminism is fighting for a world in which everyone has access to food and shelter, to beauty and pleasure. What excites you about launching a feminist magazine at this moment?

SL: Weve gotten very good at criticizing the inadequacies of the right and certain forms of liberal feminism. We also want to be constructing a vision of what we want. The pieces were working on are all addressing questions that we have about the world we want to live in and the organizing that we are doing. We are very interested in putting forward the idea that the purpose of politics is for people to have a good life. And we should think about what that good life would consist of.

Get unlimited access: $9.50 for six months.

MJ: There isnt a Lux that already exists. Lux is going to be a really pretty magazineit has to be.

ED: Why is it important to you that Lux looks good?

SL: To me, it was important [that Lux be a glossy] because I grew up reading glossy womens magazines. I wanted to build this thing that I had always enjoyed reading, but fill it with socialism.

Publications on the left often take the form of journals that suggest in their tone or their style that you should already be in the know. I want the opposite of that. I want it to be a gate flung open that people feel free to walk through.

Theres something radical in the strategic pursuit of pleasure. Weve spent decades talking about whether women can have it all, which is actually this kind of depressing idea of working all the time but also doing domestic work all the time. In a sense, it is very unambitious: Can you contort yourself to conform to the unreasonable expectations of this society? One of our taglines is We want it all, with the idea being, if we really want a good life, fundamental things about how our society is structured would have to be transformed.

ED:It sounds like your approach is not just about the look; its also about the kinds of features and content youll be running.

MJ: Ive always been really excited to be involved in a project where the goal is to convert people. Our magazine is definitely for someone who hasnt read Marx yetor any kind of leftist or feminist theorists.

ED: Lux was born out of the connections you made doing political organizing. Do you see it going the other way? Do you intend to use Lux as an organizing tool?

MJ: I really hope for it to be both an organizing and consciousness-raising tool. I think a lot of organizing can come out of reading groups. After you read about all this stuff, youre energized to organize around it. Were all organizers. Were all really connected to the movement. So I definitely hope that we do more political stuff.

SL: Were all volunteering to do Lux as a political project.

MJ: I dont want to use the term labor of love, because we talked about thisI view it as an organizing project.

Go here to see the original:
The Socialist Glossy That Wants You to Have It All - The Nation