Mediaboss Marketing

Back in November, local economist Alan Harvey explained in a Person of Interest feature that he was, at the time, reading Hyman Minsky's 1975 book on the work of John Maynard Keynes, arguably the most influential economist of the 20th century. Whether you believe it or not, we all live in a Keynesian world. Even Trump and the GOP can't escape Keynes, which is why the US has a huge military budget and no real enemies to make sense of it. All of the massive government spending forms one of the key supports of this economy, producing jobs for the poor and providing demand for a number of privately-owned enterprises. This is Keynes. Harvey, who is a post-Keynesian (I explain that here), recommended reading the last chapter of Minsky's John Maynard Keynes first. In that brilliant section, Minksy questions the social usefulness of full employment, explains why capital is scarce, and, as concerns this post, offers a counter-intuitive reason for why socialism, if done right, should be better for entrepreneurialism.

Minsky writes:

Please re-read that passage. It might be the most important piece of economic thinking you will ever be exposed to. It takes time to fully grasp its meaning, which is profound. It not only describes the world you live in, but also the world you should live in. And this other world is not in some future, nor does it require a revolution to obtain. It is concrete. It is already here.

Obamacare, for example, offers a real-world way to make Minsky's point about socialism obvious. Let's turn to something Mark Herbert, the California director for Small Business Majority, said in "What California's smallest businesses stand to lose with Obamacare repeal": "When youre providing a benefit that allows folks to take that risk with a little more of a safety net that allows more entrepreneurs to take the plunge..."

The fact of the matter is, one out of five people on Obamacare are self-employed, and many of these people own a business because they could "take the plunge." Universal health care is a form of socialism. It socializes the risks of injury and illness. This socialization is, in essence, liberating. A socialism that works is supposed to democratize freedom. By removing the wall of expensive health insurance, people can leave jobs in "institutionalized giant firms" that provide health care, and try to start something new. A functional socialism should encourage entrepreneurialism. A functional capitalism, on the other hand, does everything to lock people up in firms that fear competition, the new, a challenge to their share of the market. This is why markets can never be perfect under capitalisma fact that was obvious to post-Keynesians like Joan Robertson.

To conclude: "Herbert said rolling back subsidized health care and the no-exclusion policy for preexisting conditions could lead entrepreneurs to abandon their endeavors for more secure jobs, or prevent them from setting up shop in the first place."

Follow this link:
SLOG - TheStranger.com