Book Review: Capital and Ideology by Thomas Piketty – London School of Economics
InCapital and Ideology,Thomas Piketty proposes a vision for a fairer economic system grounded in participatory socialism. Thisencyclopaedic, rewarding work merits thoughtful engagement and is essential reading, writesEwan McGaughey.
Capital and Ideology. Thomas Piketty (translated by Arthur Goldhammer). Harvard University Press. 2020.
Thomas Pikettys Capital and Ideology is an encyclopaedic, rewarding work that merits thoughtful engagement. I think this is a much better book than the previous one, said Piketty, referring to Capital in the Twenty-First Century (2014). So if you read only one, please read this one! Personally, I would read both: while Capital in the Twenty-First Century has a positive thesis that with our current laws, the rate of return to capital exceeds the rate of growth (r > g), Capital and Ideology builds a normative thesis, driven by this data, that we should adopt democratic or participatory socialism. Piketty argues all societies use ideology to legitimise inequality; this dominant narrative leads to rules and rules entrench inequality (1). Our era wants to see itself as postideological but is in reality saturated by ideology (961). So, if things are going wrong, we should have a better ideology.
This review engages three key ideas in Capital and Ideology: first, what democratic socialism involves; second, how votes in our economic constitution are even more unequal than wealth inequality; and third, how laws build markets and power sets prices.
With inequality out of control, Pikettys answer is democratic socialism. First, Piketty calls for extending the right to vote to workers in all enterprises. Workers should have half the board seats in all private firms, large or small and we should create true social ownership of capital (972). We must overhaul the labor code and, more generally, the entire legal system to achieve a just wage for everyone and a more equal distribution of economic power (1003).
Second, Piketty calls for fair tax, including progressive taxation of wealth based on ability to pay (996). With this we can create a universal capital endowment, and an ambitious social state (1000-16). This goes to the heart of Pikettys definition of a just society where all members have access to fundamental goods like education, health, the right to vote, so that even the least advantaged can enjoy the highest possible life conditions (678-79). Thus, Piketty emphasises both predistribution to get things right (that is, ensuring law doesnt drive inequality in its construction of the market or the state), and redistribution to undo the wrong.
Third, international trade needs to be balanced by fiscal cooperation, such as pledging at least 1 per cent of GDP for developmental assistance (1022-24). For the climate crisis, Piketty favours carbon taxes at 100 per tonne of carbon. However, fundamentally all reserves of fossil fuels would be better kept in the ground to prevent global warming (654).
Image Credit: Crop of Thomas_Piketty_2086 by LSE in Pictures
The value in Pikettys work is that socialism is well tested, but the democratic part less so. A good contrast is Albert Einsteins Why Socialism? (1949). Einstein argued that capitalism means we are unceasingly striving to deprive each other of the fruits of their collective labor [] in faithful compliance with legally established rules. Law makes productive capacity the private property of individuals, workers dont share fairly in the value they create and private capital becomes concentrated. The crippling of the social consciousness of individuals is the worst evil of capitalism and one from which our whole educational system suffers. But if there were a more socialist economy, asked Einstein, how do we prevent bureaucracy from becoming all-powerful and overweening to protect the rights of the individual? With 70 years of experience, we can now provide a better answer to this question.
With fair tax and trade, Pikettys democratic socialism turns on who has votes in the economy, but this deserves some unpacking (full disclosure: Chapter Eleven draws on my writings on German, British and US law and history). First, most EU and OECD countries have a system for large corporations to have worker representation, typically one-third in large companies. Some of the best universities have majority-elected governing bodies, such as Oxford, Cambridge and Toronto. A growing body of research shows that we are poorer, more unequal and less innovative if we let shareholders and unaccountable managers monopolise enterprise governance. Pikettys work could be valuably extended if we collect more systematic data on voting systems and their effect on economic variables.
Second, Pikettys call for true social ownership of capital leaves much to discuss. Most major corporations are nominally controlled by shareholders, who may fire directors. (The big exception is Delaware, USA, where directors tend to be much harder to remove.) Shareholders, however, are not individuals but overwhelmingly asset managers or banks with other peoples money.
The big 3 in the US are BlackRock, State Street and Vanguard, and combined they would be the largest shareholder in 435 of the 500 biggest companies. The shareholder votes they control come mostly from workers saving for retirement. About 12 people set all the priorities of corporate America including wages, fossil fuel use, political lobbying and production decisions in those asset managers. Much the same goes for Deutsche Bank, Commerzbank,Socit Gnrale and Unicredit: power without responsibility. These middlemen should be strictly tied to the voting preferences of the real investors, who want fair pay, clean air and democratic politics. Similarly, sovereign wealth or national pension funds need to be strictly accountable to the people whose money is at stake. Fair tax, and fair wages, will vastly broaden the equitable distribution of capital.
Third, if competitive markets fail, the public needs a voice too. In education, health, municipal energy and water, and in media organisations, students, patients, residents and users often have voting rights but not in any coherent way. Pikettys thesis could usefully be extended here: votes at work, in capital and in public services.
A third key idea is that the level of wages and profits [] depends on prevailing institutions, rules and bargaining power [] as well as on taxes and regulations (641). This is groundbreaking and deserves discussion. Micro-economics theory has often asserted that prices are set by supply and demand, and in a competitive market they should reflect the marginal value added to production. However, Adam Smith saw that those with more power can hold out longer in negotiations. When the first supply/demand charts were sketched by Fleeming Jenkin for corn, he was adamant that the same logic could not apply to labour, where workers were in a weaker position.
All markets are shaped by inequality of bargaining power, but for workers, tenants, consumers and small investors unequal power is systematic. Unequal bargaining power comes firstly from unequal distribution of resources, protected by our laws of property, contract, corporations, taxes and more. Second, bargaining power is driven by differences in collective organisation. Third, there are differences of information. Supply and demand merely set outer constraints on prices (the lowest a seller will go, the highest a buyer will pay if they can go elsewhere), and the actual place where a deal is struck depends on the actors power. If we chart unequal bargaining power with supply/demand, instead of lines and a single equilibrium point, there are bands and a range of equilibrium outcomes (in the central diamond):
The result is that when rules set prices, such as a minimum wage, an energy cap or drug costs, or when rules require fair taxes, there is no distortion of efficiency compared to rules that allow a stronger party to impose prices on the weak. Very often there is an improvement of welfare if the rule prevents corporations taking an unjust gain by exploiting their unequal bargaining power. This theory is simple, intuitive and established in law, in contrast to complex explanations that markets are monopolistic or monopsonistic (relating to powerful buyers), dating from John Hicks, helpful as many have found them. It explains why most countries use fair wages, rent and price regulation successfully.
Paul Krugmans review of Capital and Ideology stated he was not even sure what the books message is. Yet on reading the book, its crystal clear that Piketty successfully puts forward a superb, data-driven normative defence of democratic socialism. The principles that Piketty proposes fair tax, fair trade, clean air and, above all, a democratic economy have a huge amount to commend them, and make this book an essential read.
Please read our comments policy before commenting.
Note: This article gives the views of the author, and not the position of USAPP American Politics and Policy, nor of the London School of Economics.
Shortened URL for this post:https://bit.ly/3MyWWWY
Ewan McGaughey Kings College, LondonDr Ewan McGaughey (@ewanmcg) is a Reader at the School of Law, Kings College, London, a research associate at the University of Cambridge, Centre for Business Research, and a volunteer for the Free Representation Unit.
Read more here:
Book Review: Capital and Ideology by Thomas Piketty - London School of Economics
- Socialism leads to worse things than expensive food - Times Leader - August 12th, 2025 [August 12th, 2025]
- 65: Malaysian socialist: Why young people are turning to socialism - Green Left - August 12th, 2025 [August 12th, 2025]
- Trump Is Trying To Fast-Track Deportations for People Who Came Here Legally To Flee Socialism and Communism - yahoo.com - August 9th, 2025 [August 9th, 2025]
- Sweet Socialism is a dish best served cold at the NYT - New York Post - August 9th, 2025 [August 9th, 2025]
- COLUMNIST: Socialism leads to worse things than expensive food - Northwest Arkansas Democrat-Gazette - August 9th, 2025 [August 9th, 2025]
- Gutfeld!: People who think socialism is nice have never read a history book - MSN - August 9th, 2025 [August 9th, 2025]
- Gutfeld!: People who think socialism is nice have never read a history book - Fox News - August 9th, 2025 [August 9th, 2025]
- Sweet Socialism: Dish Best Served Cold at the NYT - RealClearMarkets - August 9th, 2025 [August 9th, 2025]
- Star Parker: Socialism on the rise among America's young people - The Daily Reflector - August 7th, 2025 [August 7th, 2025]
- CWI World Congress donate to support the fight for socialism worldwide - Socialist Party - August 7th, 2025 [August 7th, 2025]
- Other voices: Socialism leads to worse things than expensive food - Pioneer Press - August 7th, 2025 [August 7th, 2025]
- Is the Campus Mental Health Crisis Rooted in Socialism? - Minding The Campus - August 6th, 2025 [August 6th, 2025]
- Socialism's appeal is greater than its 'evil' reality: David Webb - Fox Business - August 6th, 2025 [August 6th, 2025]
- Opinion: Beware of the Siren's Song of Socialism - Oak Ridger - August 1st, 2025 [August 1st, 2025]
- The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of Gary Nevilles money - The Telegraph - August 1st, 2025 [August 1st, 2025]
- NYCs Economic Dysfunction Pushed Voters Too Far. Will They Now Choose Socialism? - The Daily Economy - July 30th, 2025 [July 30th, 2025]
- Mamdani and the debate over socialism | GUEST COMMENTARY - Baltimore Sun - July 28th, 2025 [July 28th, 2025]
- Sen. Rick Scott to fly banner urging New Yorkers who hate socialism to move to Florida: We have better beaches - New York Post - July 27th, 2025 [July 27th, 2025]
- Socialism at Its Best - Daily Kos - July 27th, 2025 [July 27th, 2025]
- No plan or intention to reconsider or remove 'socialism' & 'secularism' from Preamble of the Constitution: - The Economic Times - July 27th, 2025 [July 27th, 2025]
- What The Centre Said On Removing 'Socialism' And 'Secularism' From Preamble - Times Now - July 24th, 2025 [July 24th, 2025]
- What The Centre Said On Removing 'Socialism' And 'Secularism' From Preamble - MSN - July 24th, 2025 [July 24th, 2025]
- No intention to remove 'socialism', 'secularism' from Preamble: Govt - Business Standard - July 24th, 2025 [July 24th, 2025]
- Mamdani explains his radical upbringing and fondness for socialism in unearthed clips - MSN - July 24th, 2025 [July 24th, 2025]
- The Future of Democratic Socialism - City Journal - July 22nd, 2025 [July 22nd, 2025]
- Opinion | Nepals socialism: The biggest scam - The Kathmandu Post - July 22nd, 2025 [July 22nd, 2025]
- Surveys On Socialism And Zohran Mamdani - Forbes - July 22nd, 2025 [July 22nd, 2025]
- John Swinney needs to understand socialism and independence are inseparable - TheNational.scot - July 22nd, 2025 [July 22nd, 2025]
- Jesse Kline: Give 16-year-olds the vote? Only if you want never-ending socialism - National Post - July 22nd, 2025 [July 22nd, 2025]
- Whole Hog Politics: Its the socialism, stupid - The Hill - July 20th, 2025 [July 20th, 2025]
- Marxism is key to leading fight from capitalism to socialism - The Militant - July 20th, 2025 [July 20th, 2025]
- Beware the Democrats dangerous embrace of socialism - The Hill - July 18th, 2025 [July 18th, 2025]
- Socialism for the rich should be the real concern | Linda Bernhardt - Wisconsin State Journal - July 18th, 2025 [July 18th, 2025]
- Red Flags: A necessary reckoning with Actually Existing Socialism (AES) - springmag.ca - July 18th, 2025 [July 18th, 2025]
- What you missed at the Socialism 2025 annual conference - The Hill - July 16th, 2025 [July 16th, 2025]
- Socialism failed spectacularly in India: Zohos Sridhar Vembu on why the word should be removed from Con - The Economic Times - July 16th, 2025 [July 16th, 2025]
- 'Socialism has failed': Zoho's Sridhar Vembu calls it a smokescreen to expand govt control - Business Today - July 16th, 2025 [July 16th, 2025]
- Democratic socialism is dying. First the socialism, now the democracy - telegraph.co.uk - July 12th, 2025 [July 12th, 2025]
- Socialism and corruption: what the PSOE labeled as conservative sexual morality - Contando Estrelas - July 12th, 2025 [July 12th, 2025]
- Bernard S. Sharfman: Socialism will not save the Democratic Party. Its historic centrism will. - Pittsburgh Post-Gazette - July 10th, 2025 [July 10th, 2025]
- Zohran Mamdani: Hypocrisy, Socialism and the Danger of Elitist Politics - Fair Observer - July 8th, 2025 [July 8th, 2025]
- 'Ask Ann Landers' column once used cows as analogy to explain fascism and socialism - Snopes - July 8th, 2025 [July 8th, 2025]
- Letter to the Editor: Republican reconciliation bill is 'socialism for the rich' - Sioux City Journal - July 8th, 2025 [July 8th, 2025]
- Opinion | Cliff Asness on Zohran Mamdanis Socialism - WSJ - July 6th, 2025 [July 6th, 2025]
- Some Thoughts on Techno-Fascism From Socialism 2025 - Organizing My Thoughts - July 6th, 2025 [July 6th, 2025]
- Dont go down the Islamist rabbit hole: Socialism is what makes Mamdani toxic - New York Post - July 4th, 2025 [July 4th, 2025]
- The Worker-Peasant Alliance in the Transition to Socialism Today - Monthly Review - July 4th, 2025 [July 4th, 2025]
- Socialism, secularism are the spirit of the Constitution - The Hindu - July 4th, 2025 [July 4th, 2025]
- Hour 1 - Socialism will ruin NYC | NewsTalk 1320 KWHN | The Clay Travis and Buck Sexton Show - iHeart - July 4th, 2025 [July 4th, 2025]
- Daughter of Cuban exiles says Democratic socialism is wonderful in theory but miserable in practice - Fox Business - July 2nd, 2025 [July 2nd, 2025]
- Readers sound off on vilifying socialism, Trumps retaliation and a snipers victims - New York Daily News - July 2nd, 2025 [July 2nd, 2025]
- Socialism is a fantasy politicians are selling and doesnt work: Editor - NewsNation - July 2nd, 2025 [July 2nd, 2025]
- As a New York Resident Here Is My Biggest Worry About Mamdanis Socialism - The Daily Signal - July 2nd, 2025 [July 2nd, 2025]
- Opinion: The secularism-socialism debate is a fight over words, not essence - The News Minute - July 2nd, 2025 [July 2nd, 2025]
- Winklevoss and Armstrong Warn: Socialism Punishes the Poor the Most - Bitcoin.com News - June 29th, 2025 [June 29th, 2025]
- The siren song of socialism - The Highland County Press - June 29th, 2025 [June 29th, 2025]
- How Bezos and Snchez Just Delivered a Pitch-Perfect Ad for Socialism - The Daily Beast - June 28th, 2025 [June 28th, 2025]
- Zohran Mamdani and the Rise of Hipster Socialism - City Journal - June 28th, 2025 [June 28th, 2025]
- From MAGA Marxism to NY Socialism, something is happening in America - AL.com - June 28th, 2025 [June 28th, 2025]
- GMR Today: Can socialism win at the ballot box? - Communist Party USA - June 28th, 2025 [June 28th, 2025]
- A City Not Of Socialism: Eric Adams Takes Shot At Zohran Mamdani As He Launches Reelection Bid - The Daily Wire - June 28th, 2025 [June 28th, 2025]
- Eric Adamss Common Sense Will Save New York From Radical Socialism - The New York Sun - June 28th, 2025 [June 28th, 2025]
- Socialism in practice: Private land was 32.4 times as productive as public land in the Soviet Union - Stephen Hicks.org - June 24th, 2025 [June 24th, 2025]
- NYCs Zohran Mamdani Tries Selling Socialism to the Home of Wall Street - Bloomberg.com - June 22nd, 2025 [June 22nd, 2025]
- In todays US, saying be careful with crypto sounds like socialism - The Irish Times - June 22nd, 2025 [June 22nd, 2025]
- Ahead of Shreveport Rally, Louisiana Says No Thanks to Bernies Socialism and Tax Hikes - Bossier Press-Tribune - June 22nd, 2025 [June 22nd, 2025]
- Despite the Pain in the World, Socialism Is Not a Distant Utopia: The Twenty-Fifth Newsletter (2025) - thetricontinental.org - June 20th, 2025 [June 20th, 2025]
- The Cuban regime now says that to build socialism, a "well-structured economic system" is needed - CiberCuba - June 18th, 2025 [June 18th, 2025]
- We are heading for economic disaster: say goodbye to virtue-signalling socialism - The Telegraph - June 10th, 2025 [June 10th, 2025]
- Party for Socialism and Liberation holds NATO protest in Dayton - Cincinnati Enquirer - May 26th, 2025 [May 26th, 2025]
- Anti-U.S. Extremist Party For Socialism And Liberation, Linked To DC Jewish Event Shooter, Celebrates Hamas Attacks In NYC On October 8, 2023: The... - May 26th, 2025 [May 26th, 2025]
- STUC general secretary accused of 'champagne socialism' over second home - Yahoo News UK - May 26th, 2025 [May 26th, 2025]
- Under the socialism umbrella: Labor torched over pie in the sky super reform - MSN - May 26th, 2025 [May 26th, 2025]
- Socialism dressed up in the politics of empathy - The Spectator Australia - May 26th, 2025 [May 26th, 2025]
- Daz-Canel: "The fight against homophobia and transphobia is part of the ideals of socialism in Cuba." - CiberCuba - May 19th, 2025 [May 19th, 2025]
- Left turns toward socialism, and America must be on guard - The Mountaineer - May 17th, 2025 [May 17th, 2025]
- Join the Trotskyist movement to fight for socialism - World Socialist Web Site - May 15th, 2025 [May 15th, 2025]
- "Socialism, yes... but with an hourly rate": The wave of memes about the rental of the Anti-Imperialist Tribune - CiberCuba - May 15th, 2025 [May 15th, 2025]
- Economic Nationalism Divides Us. World Socialism Is the Answer | Opinion - Newsweek - May 15th, 2025 [May 15th, 2025]
- Class struggle and identity politics in the era of Trump - International Socialism - May 15th, 2025 [May 15th, 2025]