Second Amendment – lawbrain.com
The Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution protects the right to keep and bear arms.
The Second Amendment, a provision of the U.S. Constitution, was ratified on December 15, 1791, forming what is known as the Bill of Rights. The Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution[1] reads:
The subject matter and unusual phrasing of this amendment led to much controversy and analysis, especially in the last half of the twentieth century. Nevertheless, the meaning and scope of the amendment have long been decided by the Supreme Court.
Firearms played an important part in the colonization of America. In the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, European colonists relied heavily on firearms to take land away from Native Americans and repel attacks by Native Americans and Europeans. Around the time of the Revolutionary War, male citizens were required to own firearms for fighting against the British forces. Firearms were also used in hunting.
In June 1776, one month before the signing of the Declaration of Independence, Virginia became the first colony to adopt a state constitution. In this document, the state of Virginia pronounced that "a well regulated Militia, composed of the body of the people, trained to arms, is the proper, natural, and safe defence of a free State." After the colonies declared their independence from England, other states began to include the right to bear arms in their constitution. Pennsylvania, for example, declared that
The wording of clauses about bearing arms in late-eighteenth-century state constitutions varied. Some states asserted that bearing arms was a "right" of the people, whereas others called it a "duty" of every able-bodied man in the defense of society.
Pennsylvania was not alone in its express discouragement of a standing (professional) army. Many of the Framers of the U.S. Constitution rejected standing armies, preferring instead the model of a citizen army, equipped with weapons and prepared for defense. According to Framers such as Elbridge Gerry of Massachusetts and George Mason of Virginia a standing army was susceptible to tyrannical use by a power-hungry government.
At the first session of Congress in March 1789, the Second Amendment was submitted as a counterweight to the federal powers of Congress and the president. According to constitutional theorists, the Framers who feared a central government extracted the amendment as a compromise from those in favor of centralized authority over the states. The Revolutionary War had, after all, been fought in large part by a citizen army against the standing armies of England.
The precise wording of the amendment was changed two times before the U.S. Senate finally cast it in its present form. As with many of the amendments, the exact wording proved critical to its interpretation.
In 1791 a majority of states ratified the Bill of Rights, which included the Second Amendment. In its final form, the amendment presented a challenge to interpreters. It was the only amendment with an opening clause that appeared to state its purpose. The amendment even had defective punctuation; the comma before shall seemed grammatically unnecessary.
Legal scholars do not agree about this comma. Some have argued that it was intentional and that it was intended to make militia the subject of the sentence. According to these theorists, the operative words of the amendment are "[a] well regulated Militia shall not be infringed." Others have argued that the comma was a mistake, and that the operative words of the sentence are "the right of the people to bear arms shall not be infringed." Under this reading, the first part of the sentence is the rationale for the absolute, personal right of the people to own firearms. Indeed, the historical backdrophighlighted by a general disdain for professional armieswould seem to support this theory.
Some observers argue further that the Second Amendment grants the right of insurrection. According to these theorists, the Second Amendment was designed to allow citizens to rebel against the government. Thomas Jefferson is quoted as saying that "a little rebellion every now and then is a good thing."
Prior to the courts ruling in Heller v. District of Columbia[2], 128 S. Ct. 2783 (2008)(see infra), the Supreme Court had made the ultimate determination of the Constitution's meaning, and it defined the amendment as simply granting to the states the right to maintain a militia separate from federally controlled militias. This interpretation first came in United States v. Cruikshank,[3] 92 U.S. 542, 23 L. Ed. 588 (1875). In Cruikshank, approximately one hundred persons were tried jointly in a Louisiana federal court with felonies in connection with an April 13, 1873, assault on two AfricanAmerican men. One of the criminal counts charged that the mob intended to hinder the right of the two men to bear arms. The defendants were convicted by a jury, but the circuit court arrested the judgment, effectively overturning the verdict. In affirming that decision, the Supreme Court declared that "the second amendment means no more than that [the right to bear arms] shall not be infringed by Congress, and has no other effect than to restrict the powers of the national government."
In Presser v. Illinois,[4] 116 U.S. 252, 6 S. Ct. 580, 29 L. Ed. 615 (1886), Herman Presser was charged in Illinois state court with parading and drilling an unauthorized militia in the streets of Chicago in December 1879, in violation of certain sections of the Illinois Military Code. One of the sections in question prohibited the organization, drilling, operation, and parading of militias other than U.S. troops or the regular organized volunteer militia of the state. Presser was tried by the judge, convicted, and ordered to pay a fine of $10.
On appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, Presser argued, in part, that the charges violated his Second Amendment right to bear arms. The Court disagreed and upheld Presser's conviction. The Court cited Cruikshank for the proposition that the Second Amendment means only that the federal government may not infringe on the right of states to form their own militias. This meant that the Illinois state law forbidding citizen militias was not unconstitutional. However, in its opinion, the Court in Presser delivered a reading of the Second Amendment that seemed to suggest an absolute right of persons to bear arms: "It is undoubtedly true that all citizens capable of bearing arms constitute the reserved military force or reserve militia of the United States," and "states cannot prohibit the people from keeping and bearing arms."
Despite this generous language, the Court refused to incorporate the Second Amendment into the Fourteenth Amendment. Under the first section of the Fourteenth Amendment, passed in 1868, states may not abridge the privileges and immunities of citizens of the United States. The privileges and immunities of citizens are listed in the Bill of Rights, of which the Second Amendment is part. Presser had argued that states may not, by virtue of the Fourteenth Amendment, abridge the right to bear arms. The Court refused to accept the argument that the right to bear arms is a personal right of the people. According to the Court, "The right to drill or parade with arms, without, and independent of, an act of congress or law of the state authorizing the same, is not an attribute of national citizenship."
The Presser opinion is best understood in its historical context. The Northern states and the federal government had just fought the Civil War against Southern militias unauthorized by the federal government. After this ordeal, the Supreme Court was in no mood to accept an expansive right to bear arms. At the same time, the Court was sensitive to the subject of federal encroachment on states' rights.
Several decades later, the Supreme Court ignored the contradictory language in Presser and cemented a limited reading of the Second Amendment. In United States v. Miller,[5] 307 U.S. 174, 59 S. Ct. 816, 83 L. Ed. 1206 (1939), defendants Jack Miller and Frank Layton were charged in federal court with unlawful transportation of firearms in violation of certain sections of the National Firearms Act of June 26, 1934 (ch. 757, 48 Stat. 12361240 [26 U.S.C.A. 1132 et seq.]). Specifically, Miller and Layton had transported shotguns with barrels less than 18 inches long, without the registration required under the act.
The district court dismissed the indictment, holding that the act violated the Second Amendment. The United States appealed. The Supreme Court reversed the decision and sent the case back to the trial court. The Supreme Court stated that the Second Amendment was fashioned "to assure the continuation and render possible the effectiveness of militia forces."
The Miller opinion confirmed the restrictive language of Presser and solidified a narrow reading of the Second Amendment. According to the Court in Miller, the Second Amendment does not guarantee the right to own a firearm unless the possession or use of the firearm has "a reasonable relationship to the preservation or efficiency of a well regulated militia."
However, in Heller v. District of Columbia, 128 S. Ct. 2783 (2008), the Supreme Court reviewed a case where D.C. residents challenged an ordinace which banned the possession of handguns. The Supreme Court held that the constitution protects the right of individuals to possess a firearm.
The legislative measures that inspire most Second Amendment discussions are gun control laws. Since the mid-nineteenth century, state legislatures have been passing laws that infringe a perceived right to bear arms. Congress has also asserted the power to regulate firearms. No law regulating firearms has ever been struck down by the Supreme Court as a violation of the Second Amendment.
Historically, the academic community has largely ignored the Second Amendment. However, gun control laws have turned many laypersons into scholars of the Second Amendment's history. The arguments for a broader interpretation are many and varied. Most center on the original intent of the Framers. Some emphasize that the Second Amendment should be interpreted as granting an unconditional personal right to bear arms for defensive and sporting purposes. Others adhere to an insurrection theory, under which the Second Amendment not only grants the personal right to bear arms, it gives citizens the right to rebel against a government perceived as tyrannical.
In response to these arguments, supporters of the prevailing Second Amendment interpretation maintain that any right to bear arms should be secondary to concerns for public safety. They also point out that other provisions in the Constitution grant power to Congress to quell insurrections, thus contradicting the insurrection theory. Lastly, they argue that the Constitution should be interpreted in accordance with a changing society and that the destructive capability of semiautomatic and automatic firearms was not envisioned by the Framers.
In response to the last argument, critics maintain that because such firearms exist, it should be legal to use them against violent criminals who are themselves wielding such weapons.
In the 2000s, federal courts continue to revisit the scope and detail of the Second Amendment right to bear arms. In particular federal courts have recast much of the debate as one over whether the Second Amendment protects a "collective" right or an "individual" right to bear arms. If the Second Amendment protects only a collective right, then only states would have the power to bring a legal action to enforce it and only for the purpose of maintaining a "well-regulated militia." If the Second Amendment protects only an individual right to bear arms, then only individuals could bring suit to challenge gun-control laws that curb their liberty to buy, sell, own, or possess firearms and other guns.
Not surprisingly, courts are conflicted over how to resolve this debate. In United States v. Emerson,[6][7] 270 F.3d 203 (5th Cir. 2001), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit found that the original intent of the Founding Fathers supported an individual-rights interpretation of the Second Amendment, while the Ninth Circuit came to the opposite conclusion in Nordyke v. King,[8] 319 F.3d 1185 (9th Cir. 2003). Although no court has concluded that the original intent underlying the Second Amendment supports a claim for both an individual- and a collective rights based interpretation of the right to bear arms, the compelling historical arguments marshaled on both sides of the debate would suggest that another court faced with the same debate may reach such a conclusion.
Becker, Edward R. 1997. "The Second Amendment and Other Federal Constitutional Rights of the Private Militia." Montana Law Review 58 (winter).
Bogus, Carl T., ed. 2000. The Second Amendment in Law and History: Historians and Constitutional Scholars on the Right to Bear Arms. New York: New Press.
Dolan, Edward F., and Margaret M. Scariano. 1994. Guns in the United States. New York: Watts.
Dunlap, Charles J., Jr. 1995. "Revolt of the Masses: Armed Civilians and the Insurrectionary Theory of the Second Amendment." Tennessee Law Review 62 (spring).
Hanson, Freya Ottem. 1998. The Second Amendment: The Right to Own Guns. Springfield, N.J.: Enslow.
Hook, Donald D. 1992. Gun Control: The Continuing Debate. Washington, D.C.: Second Amendment Foundation.
Hoppin, Jason. 2003. "Ninth Circuit Upholds Controversial Ruling on Second Amendment." Legal Intelligencer (May 8).
. 2003. "Second Amendment Fight Steals Show in Gun Ban Case: Panel Enters Fray over Individual Rights." San Francisco Recorder (February 19).
McAffee, Thomas B. 1997. "Constitutional Limits on Regulating Private Militia Groups." Montana Law Review 58 (winter).
Failed to load RSS feed from http://search.yahooapis.com/WebSearchService/rss/webSearch.xml?appid=yahoosearchwebrss&query=second+amendment%20site:blogs.findlaw.com!
Originally posted here:
Second Amendment - lawbrain.com
- The Second Amendment Victory in GOPs Big, Beautiful Bill: News Article - Independent Institute - July 22nd, 2025 [July 22nd, 2025]
- Second Amendment doesn't cover convicted felons caught trying to exchange drugs for guns at a South Boston skating-rink parking lot, judge concludes -... - July 18th, 2025 [July 18th, 2025]
- Missouri sheriffs form alliance to protect Second Amendment rights - First Alert 4 - July 18th, 2025 [July 18th, 2025]
- GrabAGun, a Mobile-Focused Online Firearms Retailer and Defender of the Second Amendment, Completes Business Combination with Colombier II and Will... - July 16th, 2025 [July 16th, 2025]
- Missouri sheriffs form alliance to protect Second Amendment rights - KY3 - July 16th, 2025 [July 16th, 2025]
- Guns & Moses Reminds Us All About the Importance of Faith and the Second Amendment - The Daily Signal - July 16th, 2025 [July 16th, 2025]
- Nathan Magsig: Why Our Second Amendment Resolution Matters to the People of the Central Valley - GV Wire - July 10th, 2025 [July 10th, 2025]
- College student claims professor wouldnt grade her paper on the Second Amendment - WWNY - July 10th, 2025 [July 10th, 2025]
- College student claims professor wouldnt grade her paper on the Second Amendment - WAFB - July 8th, 2025 [July 8th, 2025]
- The Department of Justice Started a Second Amendment Task Force | An Official Journal Of The NRA - Americas 1st Freedom - July 8th, 2025 [July 8th, 2025]
- College student claims professor wouldnt grade her paper on the Second Amendment - Action News 5 - July 6th, 2025 [July 6th, 2025]
- College student claims professor wouldnt grade her paper on the Second Amendment - WABI - July 4th, 2025 [July 4th, 2025]
- The Second Amendment And The Federal Prohibition On Unlawful Drug Users From Possessing Firearms Analysis - Eurasia Review - July 4th, 2025 [July 4th, 2025]
- Two illogical GOP issues: The Electoral College and Second Amendment - The Durango Herald - June 28th, 2025 [June 28th, 2025]
- Second Amendment 'setback': Gun tax cuts stripped from Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' - Fox News - June 28th, 2025 [June 28th, 2025]
- Mass Shooting Prevented Because of Second Amendment, Expert Says - The Daily Signal - June 28th, 2025 [June 28th, 2025]
- An Official Journal Of The NRA | Why This UFC Fighter Believes in the Second Amendment - Americas 1st Freedom - June 24th, 2025 [June 24th, 2025]
- InfluenceWatch Podcast #369: Suppressors, the Second Amendment, and the Fight Against the NFA - Capital Research Center - June 24th, 2025 [June 24th, 2025]
- Cornyn Praises Second Amendment Provisions Included in Senates One Big Beautiful Bill - Senator Cornyn (.gov) - June 20th, 2025 [June 20th, 2025]
- DOJ Says AR-15s, Ammo Magazines Protected by Second Amendment in Seventh Circuit Brief - The Reload - June 20th, 2025 [June 20th, 2025]
- Chair Khatiwada submits report on Nepal Citizenship (Second Amendment) Bill in House - myRepublica - June 20th, 2025 [June 20th, 2025]
- Coders are saving the Second Amendment: DIY guns and digital resistance - The Hill - June 20th, 2025 [June 20th, 2025]
- Senate Version of One Big Beautiful Bill Could Hand a Big Win to Second Amendment Supporters - The New York Sun - June 20th, 2025 [June 20th, 2025]
- SCOTUS Turns Down Pair of Second Amendment Cases | An Official Journal Of The NRA - Americas 1st Freedom - June 12th, 2025 [June 12th, 2025]
- GOA Celebrates Supreme Court Smackdown of Mexican Gun Control Lawsuit: A Massive Victory for U.S. Sovereignty and the Second Amendment - Gun Owners of... - June 12th, 2025 [June 12th, 2025]
- New Political Thriller Explores Parental Vigilantism and the Second Amendment in the Wake of Tragedy - PR Newswire - May 22nd, 2025 [May 22nd, 2025]
- Second Amendment Victory: Trump Administration Overturns Forced Reset Trigger Ban - SOFREP - May 22nd, 2025 [May 22nd, 2025]
- Legal Adults, Limited Rights: The Second Amendment Fight For 1820-Year-Olds - concealedcarry.com - May 5th, 2025 [May 5th, 2025]
- Making the Fourth Amendment the New Second Amendment - The Assembly NC - May 5th, 2025 [May 5th, 2025]
- Federal Government Urges S. Ct. to Take Second Amendment Case - Reason Magazine - May 5th, 2025 [May 5th, 2025]
- Trumps Second 100 Days and the Second Amendment | An Official Journal Of The NRA - Americas 1st Freedom - May 5th, 2025 [May 5th, 2025]
- This Bill Doesnt Ban GunsIt Dismantles the Second Amendment Another Way - The Truth About Guns - May 5th, 2025 [May 5th, 2025]
- NRAs John Richardson admits he cant stand listening to Trump despite praising Second Amendment support - The Mirror US - April 30th, 2025 [April 30th, 2025]
- Trump administration says machine guns arent protected by Second Amendment - Washington Times - April 30th, 2025 [April 30th, 2025]
- Colorado Escalates its War on the Second Amendment : News Article - Independent Institute - April 25th, 2025 [April 25th, 2025]
- Stop the Second Amendment insanity | Letters to the editor - Sun Sentinel - April 25th, 2025 [April 25th, 2025]
- Labrador Backs DOJs Second Amendment Task Force, Joining Other States - Idaho Dispatch - April 25th, 2025 [April 25th, 2025]
- Voices of the Second Amendment Launches Live from NRA Annual Meetings & Exhibits - NRA Women - April 21st, 2025 [April 21st, 2025]
- Oswego Village Board approves second amendment of econoimic incentive agreement with Freddie's Off the Chain, increasing total grant funding to... - April 21st, 2025 [April 21st, 2025]
- Bills Protecting Veteran Second Amendment Rights Hit The House And Senate - The Truth About Guns - April 21st, 2025 [April 21st, 2025]
- Feenstra Leads Legislation to Protect Second Amendment Rights of Law-Abiding Renters and Tenants - Mix 107.3 KIOW - April 21st, 2025 [April 21st, 2025]
- Second Amendment advocate fires back against controversial gun bill: This is going to cost lives in the long run - MyNorthwest.com - April 3rd, 2025 [April 3rd, 2025]
- Restoration of Second Amendment Rights After They Are Lost - The Truth About Guns - April 3rd, 2025 [April 3rd, 2025]
- House Republicans Honor Second Amendment Promises, Advance Key Legislation - National Shooting Sports Foundation - March 28th, 2025 [March 28th, 2025]
- Congress poised to strengthen Second Amendment rights with national concealed carry reciprocity - Washington Times - March 28th, 2025 [March 28th, 2025]
- Senators team up to support proposed legislation protecting veterans Second Amendment rights - Washington Examiner - March 28th, 2025 [March 28th, 2025]
- Governor vetoes local lawmakers Second Amendment Protection Act bill - County 10 News - March 28th, 2025 [March 28th, 2025]
- Second Amendment Roundup: Court Seems Disposed to Rule for S&W and Against Mexico - Reason - March 13th, 2025 [March 13th, 2025]
- Governor Murphys Latest Plan is to Tax the Second Amendment Rights of New Jerseyans - Shore News Network - March 5th, 2025 [March 5th, 2025]
- Second Amendment Protection Act changes head to governor's desk - Wyoming Tribune - March 5th, 2025 [March 5th, 2025]
- WY: TELL THE GOVERNOR Support Second Amendment Protections! - Gun Owners of America - March 5th, 2025 [March 5th, 2025]
- Second Amendment Protection Act changes head to governor's desk - Wyoming News Now - March 5th, 2025 [March 5th, 2025]
- Gun Advocates Demand Results After Second Amendment Executive Order - MSN - March 5th, 2025 [March 5th, 2025]
- Could The Washington Post Go Pro-Second Amendment? | An Official Journal Of The NRA - America's 1st Freedom - March 1st, 2025 [March 1st, 2025]
- Second Amendment Concerns Raised After Long Island Village Bans All Gun and Ammo Sales - MSN - March 1st, 2025 [March 1st, 2025]
- Trumps bold move to strengthen the Second Amendment - Washington Times - February 27th, 2025 [February 27th, 2025]
- After York County shootings, its time to update the Second Amendment [letter] - LNP | LancasterOnline - February 27th, 2025 [February 27th, 2025]
- NSSF Praises South Dakotas Gov. Larry Rhoden for Protecting Second Amendment Privacy - National Shooting Sports Foundation - February 27th, 2025 [February 27th, 2025]
- Fear not the endless presidency: The Twenty-second Amendment - Convention of States Action - February 27th, 2025 [February 27th, 2025]
- New Florida bill would strengthen Second Amendment rights at colleges and universities - Campus Reform - February 27th, 2025 [February 27th, 2025]
- How USAID Funded the War on the Second Amendment | An Official Journal Of The NRA - America's 1st Freedom - February 14th, 2025 [February 14th, 2025]
- Bills affect homeless, addresses wildfires, makes OK a Second Amendment sanctuary state - Yahoo - February 14th, 2025 [February 14th, 2025]
- Trump Issues Executive Order: Protecting Second Amendment Rights Where are we now? - Firearms News - February 12th, 2025 [February 12th, 2025]
- Executive Order 14206Protecting Second Amendment Rights - The American Presidency Project - February 12th, 2025 [February 12th, 2025]
- Trump is protecting the Second Amendment - Washington Times - February 12th, 2025 [February 12th, 2025]
- Trump Signs Executive Order Strengthening Second Amendment | An Official Journal Of The NRA - American Hunter - February 12th, 2025 [February 12th, 2025]
- Executive Order Seeks to Protect Second Amendment After Prior Administration - Turning Point USA - February 12th, 2025 [February 12th, 2025]
- Executive Order on the Second Amendment, which doesn't need any help - Daily Kos - February 12th, 2025 [February 12th, 2025]
- NRA Statement on President Trumps Executive Order Protecting Second Amendment Rights - NRA Women - February 9th, 2025 [February 9th, 2025]
- President Trump signs executive order 'protecting Second Amendment rights' - Buckeye Firearms Association - February 9th, 2025 [February 9th, 2025]
- Trump starts unwinding Biden regulations that infringe on Second Amendment rights of Americans - Must Read Alaska - February 9th, 2025 [February 9th, 2025]
- White House Wields Executive Power to Bolster Second Amendment: - Hoodline - February 9th, 2025 [February 9th, 2025]
- DeSantis Second Amendment Summer is more about his aspirations than Floridas budget | Opinion - Miami Herald - February 5th, 2025 [February 5th, 2025]
- Dueling Gun Groups Strike Truce To Push Wyoming Second Amendment Rights Bill - Cowboy State Daily - February 5th, 2025 [February 5th, 2025]
- Trump AG Pick: I Am an Advocate for the Second Amendment, but I Will Enforce the Laws of the Land - The Reload - January 19th, 2025 [January 19th, 2025]
- Second Amendment advocates skeptical of Pam Bondi - Washington Examiner - January 19th, 2025 [January 19th, 2025]
- Federal Judges (Still) Have No Earthly Idea What to Do With the Supreme Courts Second Amendment Cases - Balls & Strikes - January 19th, 2025 [January 19th, 2025]
- Tuberville, Britt reintroduce pro-second amendment Constitutional Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act - Yellowhammer News - January 19th, 2025 [January 19th, 2025]
- Donald Trump Jr. says younger people are getting into the Second Amendment amid GrabAGun SPAC deal - Fox Business - January 9th, 2025 [January 9th, 2025]
- GrabAGun, a Mobile-Focused Online Firearms Retailer Defending the Second Amendment, to Become a Public Company through a Business Combination with... - January 9th, 2025 [January 9th, 2025]