Overview of Gov. Newsom’s Retroactive ‘Revenue Raising Proposals’ in the May Budget Revise – California Globe
As part of his May Budget Revision (the May Revise), Governor Newsom proposed several revenue raising solutions. The Governors Department of Finance has just released the proposed budget trailer bill language to implement this revenue raisers. The first proposal is a 3-year suspension of the net operating loss (NOL) deduction and the second proposal is a 3-year cap on the use of business tax credits. The following is an explanation of the proposed budget trailer bill language.
The proposed trailer bill would add a new code section to both the personal income tax (PIT) and bank and corporation (B&C) tax law sections of the California Revenue & Taxation Code (CRTC). In the PIT law section, proposed new Section 17276.23 would be added as follows:
Subdivision (a) provides that notwithstanding all of the current law CRTC sections dealing with the NOL deduction, no net operating loss deduction shall be allowed for any taxable year beginning on or after January 1, 2020 and before January 1, 2023 (thereby covering three tax years). This section applies to both a loss and a carryover of a loss.
Subdivision (b) provides that the carryover period is extended for each year that the deduction is suspended. For example, for a loss generated in 2019, the taxpayer will have three additional years added to the carryover period because the taxpayer cannot use them for the next three years.
Subdivision (c) provides the following exemptions: (1) taxpayers with net business income of less than $1 million for the taxable year. Business income is defined as income from a trade or business; income from rental activity; or, income attributable to a farming business. (2) taxpayers with modified adjusted gross income of less than $1 million for the taxable year.
In the B&C tax law section, proposed new Section 24416.23 would be added as follows:
Subdivision (a) provides that notwithstanding all of the current law code sections dealing with the NOL deduction, no net operating loss deduction shall be allowed for any taxable year beginning on or after January 1, 2020 and before January 1, 2023 (thereby covering three tax years). This applies to both a loss and a carryover of a loss.
Subdivision (b) provides that the carryover period is extended for each year that the deduction is suspended. For example, for a loss generated in 2019, the taxpayer will have three additional years added to the carryover period because the taxpayer cannot use them for the next three years.
Subdivision (c) provides the following exemption: taxpayers with income subject to tax of less than $1 million for the taxable year.
The proposed trailer bill would limit business incentive credit use to $5 million per year. This language contains four CRTC section changes. First, in the sales and use tax law section, existing CRTC Section 6902.5 would be amended as follows:
Existing law allows a claim for refund for specified taxpayers who claim the film tax credit and who have been issued a credit certificate by the California Film Commission. The first amendment would add new subdivision (c)(1) to read:
(c) (1) The limitations under Section 17039.3 and 23036.2 shall not apply to the credit amount eligible for an irrevocable election under this Section. (2) For returns filed on or after January 1, 2020 and before January 1, 2023, the credit amount eligible for an irrevocable election under subdivision (b) shall not exceed five million dollars ($5,000,000) per calendar year. While the first clause exempts this claim for refund from the general $5 million cap applicable to tax credit usage, the second clause creates a standalone $5 million cap per calendar year.
The second amendment would add new subdivision (j) to read: (j) The amendments made to this section by the act adding this subdivision shall not apply to irrevocable elections made before the enactment date of the act adding this subdivision. This provision excludes irrevocable elections for the sales/use tax claim for refund from the credit cap.
Second, in the insurance tax law section, existing CRTC Section 12206 would be amended. This code section deals with the states low-income housing tax credit. The amendment would add new subdivision (a)(4) to read:
(4) For each taxable year beginning on or after January 1, 2020, and before January 1, 2023, the amount allowed as a credit against tax (as described by Section 12201), including the carryover of any credits under this section, shall not exceed five million dollars ($5,000,000). This section creates a standalone cap of $5 million for the low-income housing tax credit that insurers can claim.
The third amendment would add new Section 17039.3 to the CRTC, which is in the personal income tax law, as follows:
17039.3. (a) Notwithstanding any provision of this part or Part 10.2 (commencing with Section 18401) to the contrary, for taxpayers not required to be included in a combined report under Section 25101, Section 25110, or authorized to be included in a combined report under Section 25101.15, for each taxable year beginning on or after January 1, 2020, and before January 1, 2023, the total of all business credits otherwise allowable under any credit under any provision of Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 17041), including the carryover of any business credit under a former provision of that chapter, for the taxable year shall not reduce the net tax, as defined in Section 17039, by more than five million dollars ($5,000,000). This section caps the use of all business credits to $5 million per tax year, for three years, for those not required to be included in a combined report.
(b) Notwithstanding any provision of this part or Part 10.2 (commencing with Section 18401) to the contrary, for taxpayers required to be included in a combined report under Section 25101, Section 25110, or authorized to be included in a combined report under Section 25101.15, the total of all business credits otherwise allowable under any provision of Chapter 2 (commencing with section 17041), including the carryover of any business credit under a former provision of that chapter, by all members of the combined report shall not reduce the aggregate amount of tax (as defined in Section 23036) of all members of the combined report by more than five million dollars ($5,000,000) for each taxable year beginning on or after January 1, 2020, and before January 1, 2023. This section caps the use of all business credits to $5 million per tax year, for three years, for those required to be included in a combined report.
(c) For purposes of this section, business credit means a credit allowable under any provision of Chapter 2 (commencing with Section 17041) other than the following credits: (1) The credit allowed by Section 17052 (relating to credit for earned income). (2) The credit allowed by Section 17052.1 (relating to credit for young child). (3) The credit allowed by Section 17052.6 (relating to credit for household and dependent care). (4) The credit allowed by Section 17052.25 (relating to credit for adoption costs). (5) The credit allowed by Section 17053.5 (relating to renters tax credit). (6) The credit allowed by Section 17054 (relating to credit for personal exemption). (7) The credit allowed by Section 17054.5 (relating to credit for qualified joint custody head of household and a qualified taxpayer with a dependent parent). (8) The credit allowed by Section 17054.7 (relating to credit for qualified senior head of household). (9) The credit allowed by Section 17061 (relating to refunds pursuant to the Unemployment Insurance Code). This section provides an exemption for nine credits as specified above.
(d) Any amounts included in an election pursuant to Section 6902.5, relating to an irrevocable election to apply credit amounts under Sections 17053.85, 17053.95, 17053.98, 23685, 23695, or Section 23698 against qualified sales and use tax, as defined in Section 6902.5, are limited to five million dollars ($5,000,000) per taxable year, but are not included in the five million dollar ($5,000,000) limitation set forth in subdivision (a) or (b). This section is a separate cap of $5 million per tax year for the film tax credit.
(e) The amount of any credit otherwise allowable for the taxable year under Section 17039 that is not allowed due to application of this section shall remain a credit carryover amount under this part. This section provides that credits not allowed during the three-year limitation can be carried over.
(f) The carryover period for any credit that is not allowed due to the application of this section shall be increased by the number of taxable years the credit or any portion thereof was not allowed. This section provides that, for each tax year a credit is not allowed, it can be carried over the same number of year(s) that it was not allowed.
(g) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary in this part or Part 10.2 (commencing with Section 18401), the credits listed in subdivision (b) shall be applied after any business credits, as limited by subdivision (a), are applied. This section has an incorrect reference subdivision (b) should actually be subdivision (c) but is intended to allow the nine credits listed in subdivision (c) to still be utilized by taxpayers. They will claim those any of those credits after they claim up to the maximum of $5 million in business credits.
(h) Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 11340) of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code does not apply to any standard, criterion, procedure, determination, rule, notice, or guideline established or issued by the Franchise Tax Board pursuant to this section. This section exempts any written issuances by the FTB from Californias Administrative Procedure Act.
The fourth amendment would add new Section 23036.3 to the CRTC, which is in the bank and corporation tax law. This section is identical to the new section in the personal income tax law set forth above as the third amendment. To understand the extend of the credit usage cap, the following is a listing of the business tax credits that are subject to the credit usage cap contained in this budget trailer bill:
CHAPTER 3.5. Tax Credits [Sections 23604 23698]
Sec. 23604 Qualified enhanced oil recovery project credit
Sec. 23608 Credit for transports of any agricultural products donated
Sec. 23609 Research and development tax credit
Sec. 23610.5 State low-income housing tax credit
Sec. 23621 Hiring credit
Sec. 23624 Joint venture program through agreement with the Director of Corrections.
Sec. 23626 Hiring credit for employees in designated census tracts
Sec. 23630 Qualified contributions approved for acceptance by Wildlife Conservation Board
Sec. 23636 Joint Strike Fighter hiring credit
Sec. 23642 Expenditures to provide access to disabled individuals
Sec. 23685 Qualified expenditures for production of qualified motion pictures
Sec. 23687 Credit for taxpayer contributions to the College Access Tax Credit Fund
Sec. 23688.5. Credit for qualified donation items to a food bank
Sec. 23689 GO-Biz hiring tax credit
Sec. 23691 Qualified rehabilitation expenditures with respect to a certified historic structure
Sec. 23695 Expenditures for the production of a qualified motion picture
Sec. 23698 Expenditures for the production of a qualified motion picture
On May 21, both the Assembly Budget Subcommittee # 4 and the Senate Budget Subcommittee # 4 heard presentations by the Department of Finance and the Legislative Analyst Office regarding these revenue raising proposals. The budget subcommittees also took limited public comment. The Assembly did not take any formal action, while the Senate held the items open, perhaps for a vote in the next week or two.
Both of these provisions, if agreed to by the Legislature, will be placed in a budget trailer bill (which has not been identified at this point). Because these provisions raise revenue from taxpayers, they will require a 2/3 majority vote in both the Assembly and Senate. These two tax law changes are estimated to raise nearly $2 billion each during their first year of implementation.
If adopted, they will apply retroactively to January 1, 2020 and taxpayers claiming an NOL deduction and/or business tax credits will need to make adjustments to their quarterly tax payments to recognize the loss of the deduction and/or the limitation on credit usage.
Chris Micheli is a lobbyist with Aprea & Micheli, as well as an Adjunct Professor of Law at the University of the Pacific McGeorge School of Law.
- Federal Bills Introduced to Safeguard Second Amendment Rights During Government Shutdowns - NSSF | The Firearm Industry Trade Association - November 5th, 2025 [November 5th, 2025]
- Why the political arguments used by conservatives to twist the Second Amendment are a public fraud - Milwaukee Independent - November 5th, 2025 [November 5th, 2025]
- Save the Filibuster Save the Second Amendment - Gun Owners of America - November 5th, 2025 [November 5th, 2025]
- The Supreme Court Is More Interested in Second Amendment Cases Than Ever Before - The Trace - November 3rd, 2025 [November 3rd, 2025]
- SNL Weekend Update: Michael Che Says Government Still Aids Food Insecure Families Through Second Amendment After SNAP Cutoff - Deadline - November 3rd, 2025 [November 3rd, 2025]
- Supreme Court to weigh Second Amendment rights of cannabis users - inlander.com - November 3rd, 2025 [November 3rd, 2025]
- The Popular 3D-Printed Gun Globalizing the Second Amendment - Bloomberg - October 30th, 2025 [October 30th, 2025]
- The Future of the Second Amendment: A Nation Divided, Armed, and at a Crossroads - The Truth About Guns - October 30th, 2025 [October 30th, 2025]
- A warning to Florida public officials about the new open-carry law - Second Amendment Foundation - October 30th, 2025 [October 30th, 2025]
- Members Newsletter: Will SCOTUS Go Narrow in its New Second Amendment Cases? - The Reload - October 30th, 2025 [October 30th, 2025]
- I just took Everytowns online firearm training course - Second Amendment Foundation - October 28th, 2025 [October 28th, 2025]
- New Hampshire Bill Strengthening Second Amendment Rights on Public Property Advances - The Truth About Guns - October 26th, 2025 [October 26th, 2025]
- An Official Journal Of The NRA | Illegal Drugs and Second Amendment Rights - Americas 1st Freedom - October 23rd, 2025 [October 23rd, 2025]
- Supreme Court Will Weigh Gun Restrictions for Drug Users - The New York Times - October 23rd, 2025 [October 23rd, 2025]
- The Right to Bear Technology: Americas Other Second Amendment - Andreessen Horowitz - October 23rd, 2025 [October 23rd, 2025]
- Supreme Court adds another gun case to the docket, over drug use and the Second Amendment - MSNBC News - October 23rd, 2025 [October 23rd, 2025]
- Supreme Court will consider case on Second Amendment rights of drug users - Yahoo - October 23rd, 2025 [October 23rd, 2025]
- Supreme Court will decide if 'habitual drug users' lose their gun rights under Second Amendment - The Spokesman-Review - October 23rd, 2025 [October 23rd, 2025]
- Supreme Court will consider case on Second Amendment rights of drug users - Fox News - October 21st, 2025 [October 21st, 2025]
- Why an American raised in Rhodesia reveres the Second Amendment - Second Amendment Foundation - October 21st, 2025 [October 21st, 2025]
- In yet another move against gun ownership, California Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom recently signed Assembly Bill 1127 into law, triggering... - October 17th, 2025 [October 17th, 2025]
- Across the aisle: shootings, safety and the Second Amendment - The Muhlenberg Weekly - October 15th, 2025 [October 15th, 2025]
- Second Amendment auditors walking roads with rifle and body armor, Fla. cops say - Police1 - October 13th, 2025 [October 13th, 2025]
- The Second Amendment Holds More Weight Than Uncle Dicks Deer Stand - NSSF | The Firearm Industry Trade Association - October 11th, 2025 [October 11th, 2025]
- Supreme Court to hear Hawaii gun law case with Second Amendment implications - Baltimore Sun - October 11th, 2025 [October 11th, 2025]
- Our Next Debate: Would America Be Safer Without the Second Amendment? - The Free Press - October 9th, 2025 [October 9th, 2025]
- Fact Check Team: SCOTUS to hear Hawaii gun law case, potential impact on Second Amendment - The National Desk - October 9th, 2025 [October 9th, 2025]
- Second Amendment auditors walking Florida roads with AR-15 and body armor - Tampa Bay Times - October 9th, 2025 [October 9th, 2025]
- Fact Check Team: SCOTUS to hear Hawaii gun law case, potential impact on Second Amendment - KRCR - October 9th, 2025 [October 9th, 2025]
- Impac Mortgage : Discloses Execution of Second Amendment to Tax Benefits Preservation Rights Agreement and Execution of Amended and Restated Key... - October 9th, 2025 [October 9th, 2025]
- Supreme Court takes Second Amendment case challenging Hawaii gun law - Fox News - October 4th, 2025 [October 4th, 2025]
- Supreme Court takes case that could allow more guns in malls and restaurants - CNN - October 4th, 2025 [October 4th, 2025]
- Justices Take Up Second Amendment Case Over Hawaii's 'Affirmative Consent' Law - Law.com - October 4th, 2025 [October 4th, 2025]
- A different view on Second Amendment rights - thepress.net - October 4th, 2025 [October 4th, 2025]
- Second Amendment Roundup: Removal of Firearm Disabilities - inkl - October 2nd, 2025 [October 2nd, 2025]
- Pursuit Attractions and Hospitality, Inc. Enters into the Second Amendment to the Credit Agreement - MarketScreener - October 2nd, 2025 [October 2nd, 2025]
- Pass the CR, then fight with Truth , and the forgotten part of the second amendment. - Daily Kos - September 30th, 2025 [September 30th, 2025]
- Letters: What the Second Amendment really guarantees - NOLA.com - September 28th, 2025 [September 28th, 2025]
- The Correct Argument for the Second Amendment - The Stanford Review - September 25th, 2025 [September 25th, 2025]
- Letter to the Editor: Protect the Second Amendment - Bemidji Pioneer - September 25th, 2025 [September 25th, 2025]
- Supreme Court should revisit the Second Amendment - Wisconsin State Journal - September 21st, 2025 [September 21st, 2025]
- The Second Amendment Was Created to Put Down Slave Revolts - CounterPunch.org - September 19th, 2025 [September 19th, 2025]
- Charlie Kirks Shocking 2023 Gun Statement Goes VIRAL after Assassination | Defends Second Amendment - Oneindia - September 17th, 2025 [September 17th, 2025]
- Georgia Sheriff Calls Upon Citizens to Exercise Their Second Amendment Rights - Firearms News - September 17th, 2025 [September 17th, 2025]
- The Trump Administration's Half-Baked Plan to Disarm Transgender People Is Legally Bankrupt: Such a Gun Ban Is Not Authorized by Statute or Allowed by... - September 17th, 2025 [September 17th, 2025]
- Budget Committee Approves Ratification Bill on Second Amendment to EC-Bulgaria Financing Agreement under Recovery and Resilience Facility - - September 17th, 2025 [September 17th, 2025]
- Guns of Delusion: Who killed Charlie Kirk? America's Second Amendment obstinacy - The Times of India - September 13th, 2025 [September 13th, 2025]
- Charlie Kirks Murder Illustrates How the Second Amendment Is Swallowing the First - Slate - September 13th, 2025 [September 13th, 2025]
- Vaccines, the Second Amendment, and the Utah Supreme Court - Utah Public Radio - September 13th, 2025 [September 13th, 2025]
- Florida Court Strikes Down Open Carry Ban, Aligning Firearm Laws with Second Amendment - Hoodline - September 13th, 2025 [September 13th, 2025]
- Charlie Kirk's pro-Second Amendment stance revisited after shooting death - Daily Express US - September 13th, 2025 [September 13th, 2025]
- Florida touts big win for Second Amendment after court throws out open carry ban - Washington Examiner - September 13th, 2025 [September 13th, 2025]
- Second Amendment activists in shock as Charlie Kirk shot instead of just schoolchildren - The Beaverton - September 13th, 2025 [September 13th, 2025]
- Fact Check: Charlie Kirk once said some gun deaths 'worth it' in order to have Second Amendment - Yahoo News UK - September 11th, 2025 [September 11th, 2025]
- DeSantis announces 'Second Amendment' tax holiday, renews push for open carry of guns - The Northwest Florida Daily News - September 11th, 2025 [September 11th, 2025]
- Fact Check: Charlie Kirk once said some gun deaths 'worth it' in order to have Second Amendment - Yahoo News Canada - September 11th, 2025 [September 11th, 2025]
- Charlie Kirk once said some gun deaths 'worth it' in order to have Second Amendment - Snopes - September 11th, 2025 [September 11th, 2025]
- Charlie Kirk said "some gun deaths" were an acceptable cost for having Second Amendment gun rights - Daily Kos - September 11th, 2025 [September 11th, 2025]
- Medical Marijuana and the Second Amendment: Eleventh Circuit Revives Second Amendment Challenge to Federal Ban on Gun Ownership for Drug Users - JD... - September 11th, 2025 [September 11th, 2025]
- Charlie Kirks Pro-Gun, Second Amendment Comments Resurface After Fatal Shooting at UVU - Times Now - September 11th, 2025 [September 11th, 2025]
- Reader says protect Second Amendment rights, but reduce access to some firearms - San Antonio Express-News - September 11th, 2025 [September 11th, 2025]
- DeSantis announces 'Second Amendment' tax holiday, renews push for open carry of guns - Lakeland Ledger - September 11th, 2025 [September 11th, 2025]
- Charlie Kirk, shot dead in Utah, once said gun deaths are 'worth it' to save Second Amendment - Firstpost - September 11th, 2025 [September 11th, 2025]
- Florida will have a Second Amendment sales tax holiday. Here's what to know - Pensacola News Journal - September 9th, 2025 [September 9th, 2025]
- DeSantis announces 'Second Amendment' tax holiday, renews push for open carry of guns - yahoo.com - September 9th, 2025 [September 9th, 2025]
- Florida Second Amendment Sales Tax Holiday begins, runs through end of the year - Floridas Voice - September 9th, 2025 [September 9th, 2025]
- Marylands Handgun Roster Board: a rubber stamp or assault on Second Amendment? - Baltimore Sun - September 6th, 2025 [September 6th, 2025]
- Tennessee joins other states on Second Amendment SCOTUS brief - WKRN News 2 - September 6th, 2025 [September 6th, 2025]
- Opinion: Bill 36-0144 Is an Unconstitutional and Racist Attack on the Second Amendment - The Virgin Islands Consortium - September 6th, 2025 [September 6th, 2025]
- Letter to the Editor: Americas Deadliest LoopholeThe Case Against the Second Amendment - Peachtree City Citizen - September 6th, 2025 [September 6th, 2025]
- Congressional Democrats Try to Stop AG Bondi from Restoring Ex-Offenders Second Amendment Rights - Cato Institute - September 5th, 2025 [September 5th, 2025]
- Understanding the Second Amendment commas and all - thepress.net - September 5th, 2025 [September 5th, 2025]
- In Louisiana, gun sales are promoted with Second Amendment tax break - Shreveport Times - September 3rd, 2025 [September 3rd, 2025]
- In Louisiana, gun sales are promoted with Second Amendment tax break - yahoo.com - September 3rd, 2025 [September 3rd, 2025]
- Cabinet Asks Parliament to Ratify Second Amendment to Recovery, Resilience Facility Financing Agreement with EC - - September 3rd, 2025 [September 3rd, 2025]
- Hunters get tax break during Louisianas Second Amendment Sales Tax Holiday Sept. 57 - Unfiltered with Kiran - September 3rd, 2025 [September 3rd, 2025]
- Analysis: The Latest on Weed, Dangerousness, and the Second Amendment [Member Exclusive] - The Reload - September 1st, 2025 [September 1st, 2025]
- Second Amendment Sales Tax Holiday recognized this weekend - WAPT - August 29th, 2025 [August 29th, 2025]
- Mississippis Second Amendment Sales Tax Holiday set for this weekend - supertalk.fm - August 29th, 2025 [August 29th, 2025]
- Minneapolis shooting: Who is Brandon Herrera? Second Amendment activist named in now-deleted video of att - The Times of India - August 29th, 2025 [August 29th, 2025]