Coffman joins Republicans against President Trump’s travel ban; Here’s where the rest stand – The Denver Post
Aaron Blake, The Washington Post
President Donald Trumps executive order to ban entry to the United States to citizens of seven predominantly Muslim countries has been roundly criticized by the international community and Democrats, who allege is amounts to a religious test even a thinly veiled Muslim ban. There have also been numerous implementation headaches, with two judges halting deportations of those denied entry.
And some Republicans are speaking out against Trump too albeit to varying degrees. Below, we break down who has gone on the record for, against, or somewhat in the middle on Trumps executive order.
This list is necessarily incomplete, but it will be updated as more lawmakers weigh in. If you see one weve missed, email aaron.blake@washpost.com.
Rep. Charlie Dent, R-Pa.: This is ridiculous. I guess I understand what his intention is, but unfortunately the order appears to have been rushed through without full consideration. You know, there are many, many nuances of immigration policy that can be life or death for many innocent, vulnerable people around the world.
Sen. Jeff Flake, R-Ariz.: Its unacceptable when even legal permanent residents are being detained or turned away at airports and ports of entry.
Rep. Justin Amash, R-Mich.: Like Pres. Obamas executive actions on immigration, Pres. Trumps executive order overreaches and undermines our constitutional system.
Sen. Ben Sasse, R-Neb.: The order is too broad. If we send a signal to the Middle East that the U.S. sees all Muslims as jihadis, the terrorist recruiters win by telling kids that America is banning Muslims and that this is America versus one religion. Our generational fight against jihadism requires wisdom.
Rep. Barbara Comstock, R-Va.: The presidents Executive Order [goes] beyond the increased vetting actions that Congress has supported on a bipartisan basis and inexplicably applied to Green Card holders. This should be addressed and corrected expeditiously.
Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick, R-Pa.: The presidents policy entirely misses the mark.
Rep. Mike Coffman, R-Colo.: While Ive supported heightened vetting procedures for those wanting to travel to our country, I have never, nor will I ever support a blanket travel ban for people solely based on ethnic or religious grounds.
Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine: The worldwide refugee ban set forth in the executive order is overly broad and implementing it will be immediately problematic.
Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, R-Fla.: I object to the suspension of visas from the seven named countries because we could have accomplished our objective of keeping our homeland safe by immediate implementation of more thorough screening procedures.
Rep. Elise Stefanik, R-N.Y.: Our first role as the federal government is to protect our national security and I believe we need to work in Congress to reform and strengthen our visa vetting process. However, I oppose President Trumps rushed and overly broad Executive Order.
Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla.: While I am supportive of strengthening our screening processes and securing our borders, a blanket travel ban goes too far. I also believe that lawful residents of the United States should be permitted to enter the country. I urge the Administration to take the appropriate steps to fix this overly broad executive order.
Rep. Will Hurd, R-Tex.: The ban is the ultimate display of mistrust and will erode allies willingness to fight with us.
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky.: Its going to be decided in the courts as to whether or not this has gone too far.
Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah: I do have some technical questions about President Trumps Executive Order titled Protecting the Nation From Foreign Terrorist Entry Into the United States. My staff and I will continue to reach out to the White House for clarification on these issues.
House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Rep. Edward R. Royce, R-Calif.: Pausing the intake of refugees from terror hot spots is the right call to keep America safe. I hope cases of individuals with visas traveling as this executive action went into effect including some who served alongside U.S. troops will be resolved quickly.
Sen. Orrin G. Hatch, R-Utah: President Trump has described his recent order as a means [to] temporarily reduce investigative burdens on relevant agencies. In this spirit, I urge the new administration to move quickly to tailor its policy on visa issuance as narrowly as possible so that officials can protect our security needs while reducing unnecessary burdens on the vast majority of visa-seekers that present a promise-not a threat-to our nation.
Rep. Carlos Curbelo, R-Fla.: The United States is and has always been a generous nation when it comes to welcoming those who seek refuge and want to contribute. I expect that these executive orders are in fact temporary and that after the Administration strengthens the vetting process, we can continue our tradition of welcoming those who are persecuted in an orderly manner and without any kind of religious test.
Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz.: The good news is its only got to do with a pause. The bad news is that obviously that this process and these conclusions were not vetted. Theres so much confusion out there.
Sen. Rob Portman, R-Ohio: It is not a ban. However, I think it was not properly vetted. So, you have an extreme vetting proposal that didnt get the vetting it should have had. And as the result, in the implementation, weve seen some problems.
Rep. Lee Zeldin, R-N.Y.: I support the temporary entry restriction from certain nations until the administration, Congress and the American people know with confidence that any individual being granted admission does not pose a threat to our security. With all that being said, I will be closely monitoring the execution of this EO to make sure that any misapplication is corrected immediately.
Sen. James Lankford, R-Okla.: We should value freedom & not surrender security. We can protect the homeland while upholding #religiousfreedom & refuge for the persecuted.
Rep. Adam Kinzinger, R-Ill.: I support a comprehensive look at our vetting process, and I believe its something every new administration would be expected to do. However, reports of green card holders and those who assisted us in the war on terror being denied or delayed entry is deeply concerning. Such detention is unacceptable and must be remedied immediately.
Rep. Bruce Poliquin, R-Maine: The congressman will not be voting on these Executive Orders. His policy in Congress has been to increase border security, end sanctuary cities and stop Syrian refugee admissions until national security agencies put in place effective processes to ensure that no suspected or potential terrorists are allowed to cross our borders.
Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C.: It is clear from the confusion at our airports across the nation that President Trumps executive order was not properly vetted. We are particularly concerned by reports that this order went into effect with little to no consultation with the Departments of State, Defense, Justice, and Homeland Security.
Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C.
Rep. Mark Walker, R-N.C.: The language of the order should not apply to legal permanent residents of the United States, and if it is being enforced in any other way, the administration should step in swiftly to clarify.
Sen. John Barrasso, R-Wyo.: America has long needed to tighten the vetting process for those seeking to come here. However, a religious test or ban is against everything our country stands for. We need to remember that some of our best sources of information that keeps our nation and our troops safe comes from our Muslim friends and allies.
Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah: I think its surprising a lot of people that he is actually doing what he said he was going to do, but there are those of us that actually support that. People that have a green card supposedly already have been vetted, so there needs to be some further clarification.
Rep. Jim Renacci, R-Ohio: While I strongly encourage the Administration to examine more closely whether it is effectual and necessary to subject green card holders from these nations to this temporary order, I fully support our governments renewed commitment to keeping Americans of all faiths safe and free across our homeland.
Sen. Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn.: This vetting proposal itself needed more vetting. More scrutiny of those traveling from war-torn countries to the United States is wise. But this broad and confusing order seems to ban legal, permanent residents with green cards, and might turn away Iraqis, for example, who were translators and helped save lives of Americans troops and who could be killed if they stay in Iraq. And while not explicitly a religious test, it comes close to one which is inconsistent with our American character.
Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn.: We all share a desire to protect the American people, but this executive order has been poorly implemented, especially with respect to green card holders. The administration should immediately make appropriate revisions, and it is my hope that following a thorough review and implementation of security enhancements that many of these programs will be improved and reinstated.
House Speaker Paul D. Ryan, R-Wis.: President Trump is right to make sure we are doing everything possible to know exactly who is entering our country.
House Homeland Security Committee Chairman Rep. Michael McCaul, R-Tex.: With the stroke of a pen, he is doing more to shut down terrorist pathways into this country than the last Administration did in eight years.
Rep. Lou Barletta, R-Pa.: I commend President Trump for suspending the refugee program, and in particular for Syria and the six other countries, because they are unquestionably terrorist havens and hotspots.
Rep. Jeff Duncan, R-S.C.: Im grateful that @realDonaldTrump is making the safety & security of the American people his top priority. His actions are very appropriate.
Rep. Steve Scalise, R-La.: Its very prudent to say, Lets be careful about who comes into our country to make sure that theyre not terrorists.
Rep. Dan Donovan, R-N.Y.: President Trumps decision is in Americas best interest, and I support exploring safe zones in the region to protect innocent life.
Rep. Bob Goodlatte, R-Va.: The primary duty of the federal government is to keep Americans safe. Today, President Trump has begun to fulfill this responsibility by taking a number of critical steps within his authority to strengthen national security and the integrity of our nations immigration system.
Rep. Dave Trott, R-Mich.: Until we can adequately vet these refugees and ensure the safety of all Americans, I support President Trumps executive order to stay refugees from these terror-prone countries.
Rep. Dave Reichert, R-Wash.: My first and most important job is protecting families in our region and the American people . . . We must be absolutely certain we have systems in place capable of thoroughly vetting anyone applying for refugee status on American soil.
Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark.: Its simply wrong to call the presidents executive order concerning immigration and refugees a religious test of any kind. I doubt many Arkansans or Americans more broadly object to taking a harder look at foreigners coming into our country from war-torn nations with known terror networks; I think theyre wondering why we dont do that already.
Sen. Roy Blunt, R-Mo.: He is doing what he told the American people he would do. I would not support a travel ban on Muslims; I do support increased vetting on people applying to travel from countries with extensive terrorist ties or activity. These seven countries meet that standard. Our top priority should be to keep Americans safe.
Rep. Bradley Byrne, R-Ala.: I appreciate President Trumps efforts to address these issues as he works to keep the American people safe. While there have been some issues with the orders implementation, I look forward to working with the Trump Administration to make sure their efforts to protect the American people succeed in a timely and effective manner.
Rep. Scott Taylor, R-Va.: While I do not agree with some of the rhetoric, taking a pause, figuring out if we are properly vetting people, and making changes if necessary to continue our American principles is prudent and needed. The safety and protection of our citizens must remain our number one priority.
Rep. Vern Buchanan, R-Fla.: LONG OVERDUE: A freeze on Syrian refugees and a crackdown on sanctuary cities! Time to protect Americans.
Rep. Dennis Ross, R-Fla.: This is long overdue. We must ensure our country is safe from radical Islamic jihadists who want to kill Americans.
Rep. John Ratcliffe, R-Tex.: I applaud President Trumps actions to vamp up the vetting of refugees attempting to enter our country.
Rep. Brian Babin, R-Tex.: Great news now lets get it into law!
Rep. Bill Johnson, R-Ohio: I support President Trumps temporary, three month, precautionary action directed towards a handful of countries with a history of producing and exporting terrorists. These countries are either torn apart by violence, or under the control of hostile, jihadist governments.
Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers, R-Wash.: It is the federal governments responsibility to protect the American people, and the Trump administration is following through on that responsibility.
Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner, R-Wis.
Rep. Jackie Walorski, R-Ind.: The temporary suspension of the refugee program and admission of individuals from countries where terrorism poses an elevated threat will allow our national security officials to examine the vetting process and strengthen safeguards to prevent terrorists from entering our homeland. I hope the administration provides greater clarity in the coming days on its implementation of the order and its review of vetting procedures.
Rep. Roger Marshall, R-Kan.: President Trump is ensuring that he is doing all he can to protect us from radical Islamic terror, and to secure channels of migration in the future. Though we would like to see a more specific definition worked through Congress, we understand the need for quick action, and we stand by him in this effort.
Rep. Luke Messer, R-Ind.: This is a pause, not a ban, while we work to ensure the U.S. has effective vetting processes in place to protect Americans from terrorist threats. The details will of course matter, but its way past time for us to develop this capability, and President Trump is right to prioritize American safety until we get this done.
Rep. Richard Hudson, R-N.C.: At a time of grave security threats, President Trump is right to pause the flow of refugees from countries where terrorism is rampant until we can properly vet them and implement additional screening for individuals traveling to and from these countries.
Rep. Pete Sessions, R-Tex.: Just as President Obama suspended the refugee program in 2011 for six months, the Trump Administration is working to protect national security by making adjustments in the refugee vetting process. It is critical that we address the threat of individuals who come to our country to create chaos and threaten our freedom.
Rep. Todd Rokita, R-Ind.: This is not a ban on Muslim refugees, as the order specifically targets a select few nations with known terrorist networks and is similar to an executive order signed by President Obama without controversy in 2011. The President and his administration must now focus on the execution of this order, ensuring that it is implemented effectively and fairly.
Rep. Jodey Arrington, R-Tex.: It is important that our commander in chief puts the safety of Americans first. Given concerns about the inadequate vetting of refugees and problems with our immigration system, this temporary pause is intended to ensure the safety of our citizens.
Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif.: In light of attempts by jihadist groups to infiltrate fighters into refugee flows to the West, along with Europes tragic experience coping with this problem, the Trump Administrations executive order on refugees is a common-sense security measure to prevent terror attacks on the homeland. While accommodations should be made for green card holders and those whove assisted the U.S. armed forces, this is a useful temporary measure on seven nations of concern until we can verify who is entering the United States.
Rep. Rod Blum, R-Iowa: The bottom line is they cant properly vet people coming from war-torn areas like Syria and Iraq. If we cant vet people properly, then we shouldnt be allowing them into our country. Im supportive of that.
Rep. Joe Barton, R-Tex.: We have heard of brief delays among constituents and are empathetic to any inconveniences while traveling.
Rep. Roger Williams, R-Tex.: President Trump is responsible for defending this country, and I think what weve seen in the last couple days with executive orders that hes passed, thats what hes doing.
Rep. Kay Granger, R-Tex.: I am convinced that resident Trump made this decision because he believes it will make us safer.
Rep. Robert Pittenger, R-N.C.: While we should be responsive to those who are persecuted for their faith or impacted by war, we need a thorough vetting of all refugees, consistent with the American Security Against Foreign Enemies Act (H.R. 4038), which I co-sponsored and helped pass with strong bipartisan support in 2015. This bipartisan legislation required the FBI, CIA, and Homeland Security to be engaged in the refugee vetting process to prevent access by infiltrated terrorists.
SENATE
Alabama:Jeff Sessions, Richard Shelby
Alaska:Dan Sullivan,Lisa Murkowski
Arkansas:John Boozman
Georgia:David Perdue,Johnny Isakson
Idaho:Jim Risch,Mike Crapo
Indiana:Todd Young
Iowa: Joni Ernst,Chuck Grassley
Kansas:Pat Roberts,Jerry Moran
Kentucky:Rand Paul
Louisiana:Bill Cassidy,John Neely Kennedy
Mississippi:Roger Wicker,Thad Cochran
Montana:Steve Daines
Nebraska:Deb Fischer
Nevada:Dean Heller
North Carolina:Richard Burr
North Dakota:John Hoeven
Oklahoma:Jim Inhofe
Pennsylvania:Pat Toomey
South Carolina:Tim Scott
South Dakota:Mike Rounds, John Thune
Texas:Ted Cruz,John Cornyn
West Virginia:Shelley Moore Capito
Wisconsin:Ron Johnson
Wyoming:Mike Enzi
HOUSE
Alabama:Martha Roby,Mike Rogers,Robert Aderholt,Mo Brooks,Gary Palmer
Alaska:Don Young
Arizona:Martha McSally,Paul Gosar,Andy Biggs,David Schweikert,Trent Franks
Arkansas:Rick Crawford,French Hill,Steve Womack,Bruce Westerman
California:Doug LaMalfa,Tom McClintock,Paul Cook,Jeff Denham,David Valadao,Kevin McCarthy,Steve Knight,Ken Calvert,Mimi Walters,Dana Rohrabacher,Darrell Issa,Duncan Hunter
Colorado:Scott Tipton,Ken Buck,Doug Lamborn
- Democrats, some Republicans unload on Trump for striking Iran without congressional approval - Washington Times - June 22nd, 2025 [June 22nd, 2025]
- Heres How the White House Wants Hill Republicans to Talk About the Iran Strikes - NOTUS - June 22nd, 2025 [June 22nd, 2025]
- Wisconsin Republicans vote to add new prosecutors, but won't replace expiring federal funds - WPR - June 22nd, 2025 [June 22nd, 2025]
- Poll: Most of the Public Support Extending the ACAs Enhanced Premium Tax Credits, Including Most Republicans and MAGA Supporters - KFF - June 22nd, 2025 [June 22nd, 2025]
- NC Senate Republicans look to advance conservative social agenda in rewrite of House bill - NC Newsline - June 22nd, 2025 [June 22nd, 2025]
- Indifferent to appearances, Republicans champion estate tax cut for the very wealthy - MSNBC News - June 22nd, 2025 [June 22nd, 2025]
- Why are Republicans obsessed with Biden but not concerned about Trump? [letter] - LancasterOnline - June 22nd, 2025 [June 22nd, 2025]
- Senate Republicans hold hearing on Bidens mental fitness as Democrats boycott - AP News - June 20th, 2025 [June 20th, 2025]
- As Ted Cruz calls for a regime change in Iran, other Texas Republicans are more cautious - The Texas Tribune - June 20th, 2025 [June 20th, 2025]
- How Republicans massive budget bill impacts the Affordable Care Act - PBS - June 20th, 2025 [June 20th, 2025]
- Senate Republicans seek tougher Medicaid cuts and lower SALT deduction in Trump's big bill - AP News - June 20th, 2025 [June 20th, 2025]
- Senate Republicans propose sale of 200 million acres of public land including land in KRV - KBAK - June 20th, 2025 [June 20th, 2025]
- Republicans consider $87 million cut to the University of Wisconsin System in the two-year state budget - Milwaukee Journal Sentinel - June 20th, 2025 [June 20th, 2025]
- Republicans, Not Democrats, Have the Messaging Problem - Washington Monthly - June 20th, 2025 [June 20th, 2025]
- Republicans uncover no new intel on Biden during hearing on his cognitive abilities in office - ABC News - Breaking News, Latest News and Videos - June 20th, 2025 [June 20th, 2025]
- Who's weaponizing who? Kentucky Republicans, Democrat Beshear still wrangling over ethics commission - Kentucky Lantern - June 20th, 2025 [June 20th, 2025]
- Political Suicide: Senate Republicans Found a Way to Make the Spending Bill Even Worse - Vanity Fair - June 20th, 2025 [June 20th, 2025]
- Please NC Republicans, quit with the fake outrage over Democrats post | Opinion - Charlotte Observer - June 20th, 2025 [June 20th, 2025]
- Senate Republicans unveil bill to make Trump tax cuts permanent: Here's what to know - Fox Business - June 20th, 2025 [June 20th, 2025]
- Republicans finally focus on oversight, but they target the wrong White House - MSNBC News - June 20th, 2025 [June 20th, 2025]
- Republicans Have An Uphill Climb To Sell Voters On Their Big, Beautiful Bill - Cook Political Report - June 20th, 2025 [June 20th, 2025]
- Majorities Oppose Republicans in Congress Proposed Budget Plan - Navigator Research - June 20th, 2025 [June 20th, 2025]
- Republicans ask for EPA probe into impact of abortion pills on water supply, infertility - Washington Times - June 20th, 2025 [June 20th, 2025]
- 'You have to compromise': Senate Republicans reveal budget negotiated with Gov. Katie Hobbs - ABC15 Arizona - June 20th, 2025 [June 20th, 2025]
- Top MAGA pollster warns Republicans will lose the majority for the next decade if Trump gets involved in Israel-Iran - Yahoo - June 20th, 2025 [June 20th, 2025]
- Republicans Add New Barriers to Oklahomas Dizzyingly Fast Process for Citizen Initiatives - boltsmag.org - June 20th, 2025 [June 20th, 2025]
- Column | These Kentucky Republicans attempt an unlikely bulwark to Trump - The Washington Post - June 1st, 2025 [June 1st, 2025]
- Lt. Gov. Patrick calls legislative session most productive ever for Republicans | Texas: The Issue Is - FOX 7 Austin - June 1st, 2025 [June 1st, 2025]
- Bill OBrien urges Republicans to get on board with big, beautiful bill | CloseUp - WMUR - June 1st, 2025 [June 1st, 2025]
- 7 ways Republicans are split over Trumps big bill - The Washington Post - June 1st, 2025 [June 1st, 2025]
- Republicans ramp up investigations into Bidens health, mental state while in office - WBMA - June 1st, 2025 [June 1st, 2025]
- Republicans and Democrats agree on this issue. Lets make it law. | EDITORIAL - Baltimore Sun - June 1st, 2025 [June 1st, 2025]
- Major Trump foe says Republicans keep approaching her with shocking message - PennLive.com - June 1st, 2025 [June 1st, 2025]
- Trump hates wind power. But these Texas Republicans are embracing it - The Guardian - June 1st, 2025 [June 1st, 2025]
- Trump takes aim at the one climate solution Republicans love - The Washington Post - June 1st, 2025 [June 1st, 2025]
- Why Are Republicans Planning to Tax University Endowments More Heavily Than Other Forms of Private Wealth? - The American Prospect - June 1st, 2025 [June 1st, 2025]
- Flake pushes Republicans on Trump foreign policy: Responsibility to speak out now rests with you - The Hill - June 1st, 2025 [June 1st, 2025]
- Opinion | My fellow Republicans, the responsibility to speak out rests with you - The Washington Post - June 1st, 2025 [June 1st, 2025]
- Republicans Big Beautiful Bill pushes new prohibitions on trans health care - Liberation News - June 1st, 2025 [June 1st, 2025]
- Americans trust the Democratic Party more on health care and Republicans more on immigration - YouGov - June 1st, 2025 [June 1st, 2025]
- Republicans big bill scared bond markets. Thats bad news for your wallet. - MSNBC News - May 26th, 2025 [May 26th, 2025]
- Analysis | The Big Beautiful Bill is a big risk for House Republicans. Many of them hope otherwise. - The Washington Post - May 26th, 2025 [May 26th, 2025]
- Top Republicans threaten to block Trumps spending bill if national debt is not reduced - The Guardian - May 26th, 2025 [May 26th, 2025]
- Florida Republicans Break With Trump Over Venezuelan Deportations - The New York Times - May 26th, 2025 [May 26th, 2025]
- How House Republicans' big tax and spending vote will shape the next election - NBC News - May 26th, 2025 [May 26th, 2025]
- House Republicans narrowly passed Trumps big, beautiful bill. Heres whats in it - PBS - May 26th, 2025 [May 26th, 2025]
- Republicans are dodging fired federal staff: They will not even look in our direction - The Guardian - May 26th, 2025 [May 26th, 2025]
- Two House Republicans missed the big vote - Politico - May 26th, 2025 [May 26th, 2025]
- House Republicans Have Passed a Bill to Gut the IRA. What Happened to All the Supposed Holdouts? - Inside Climate News - May 26th, 2025 [May 26th, 2025]
- Fury as Republicans go nuclear in fight over California car emissions - The Guardian - May 26th, 2025 [May 26th, 2025]
- 7 things Senate Republicans hate about the House megabill - Politico - May 26th, 2025 [May 26th, 2025]
- Now That House Republicans Took the Plunge, Its the Senates Turn - The New York Times - May 26th, 2025 [May 26th, 2025]
- House Republicans pass Trump's big bill of tax breaks and program cuts after all-night session - AP News - May 26th, 2025 [May 26th, 2025]
- The reconciliation bill is Republicans doing what they do best - vox.com - May 26th, 2025 [May 26th, 2025]
- The Devastating Harms of House Republicans Big, 'Beautiful' Bill by State and Congressional District - Center for American Progress - May 26th, 2025 [May 26th, 2025]
- Senate Republicans aim to get Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' to his desk by July 4 - Fox News - May 26th, 2025 [May 26th, 2025]
- House Republicans press ahead on Trump agenda bill with key issues up in the air - NBC News - May 26th, 2025 [May 26th, 2025]
- House Republicans tee up floor action on Trumps megabill - Politico - May 26th, 2025 [May 26th, 2025]
- Opinion | One Thing Still Unites Republicans - The New York Times - May 26th, 2025 [May 26th, 2025]
- House Republicans pass big, beautiful bill after weeks of division - Politico - May 26th, 2025 [May 26th, 2025]
- House Republicans Just Dealt a Blow to Wind Developers - THE CITY - NYC News - May 26th, 2025 [May 26th, 2025]
- Chuck Schumer is already panning blue state Republicans for caving on SALT - Politico - May 26th, 2025 [May 26th, 2025]
- Trump urges House Republicans not to mess with Medicaid amid push to pass bill advancing his agenda: Sources - ABC News - May 26th, 2025 [May 26th, 2025]
- Why House Republicans stripped a regulatory overhaul from their megabill for now - Politico - May 26th, 2025 [May 26th, 2025]
- Blue-state Republicans score SALT win in megabill revisions - Politico - May 26th, 2025 [May 26th, 2025]
- The 5 House Republicans who didn't vote for Trump's sweeping tax bill - USA Today - May 26th, 2025 [May 26th, 2025]
- Senate Republicans put House on notice: We won't accept your Trump agenda bill without changes - NBC News - May 15th, 2025 [May 15th, 2025]
- Republicans advance bill with steep cuts to Medicaid as part of Trump agenda - The Hill - May 15th, 2025 [May 15th, 2025]
- Conservative Republicans Revolt Over Domestic Policy Bill, Threatening Its Path - The New York Times - May 15th, 2025 [May 15th, 2025]
- House Republicans Medicaid Cuts and Associated Lives Lost by Congressional District - Center for American Progress - May 15th, 2025 [May 15th, 2025]
- Heres Whats in House Republicans Big Tax Bill to Deliver Trumps Agenda - The New York Times - May 15th, 2025 [May 15th, 2025]
- Republicans Outdo Themselves in Food Stamp Cuts - The American Prospect - May 15th, 2025 [May 15th, 2025]
- House Republicans are zeroing in on a sweeping tax package. Heres what it could mean for you - CNN - May 15th, 2025 [May 15th, 2025]
- Republicans want Congress involved in Trumps Qatar jet push - Politico - May 15th, 2025 [May 15th, 2025]
- Renewable Energy Is Booming in Texas. Republicans Want to Change That. - The New York Times - May 15th, 2025 [May 15th, 2025]
- House Republicans Tax Bill Is Full of New Loopholes for the Ultrawealthy - Center for American Progress - May 15th, 2025 [May 15th, 2025]
- House Republicans Push Forward Plan to Cut Taxes, Medicaid and Food Stamps - The New York Times - May 15th, 2025 [May 15th, 2025]
- Opinion | House Republicans are about to wreck Trumps nuclear-powered dream - The Washington Post - May 15th, 2025 [May 15th, 2025]
- Republicans May Not Even Be Able to Move Reconciliation Out of Committee on Time - notus.org - May 15th, 2025 [May 15th, 2025]
- First time we were hearing of them: The GOP megabill is packed with surprises for some Republicans - Politico - May 15th, 2025 [May 15th, 2025]