Enabling state-of-the-art quantum algorithms with Qedma’s error mitigation and IonQ, using Braket Direct | Amazon … – AWS Blog
This post was contributed by Eyal Leviatan, Barak Katzir, Eyal Bairey, Omri Golan, and Netanel Lindner from Qedma, Joshua Goings from IonQ, and Daniela Becker from AWS.
Quantum computing is an exciting, fast-paced field. And especially in these early days, unfettered access to the right set of resources is critical in order to accelerate experimentation and innovation. Amazon Braket provides customers access to a choice of quantum hardware and the tooling they need to experiment, while also enabling them to engage directly with experts across the field from scientists to device manufacturers.
In this post, the team from Qedma, a quantum software company, dives into how they used Braket Direct to accomplish a milestone demonstration of their error mitigation software on IonQs Aria device. Leveraging dedicated access to quantum hardware capacity using reservations and collaborating with IonQ scientists for expert guidance directly via AWS, Qedma was able to successfully execute some of the most challenging Variational Quantum Eigensolver (VQE) circuits on a quantum processor to date.
In todays quantum processing units (QPUs), the susceptibility to various forms of noise results in errors that corrupt the quantum program and eventually render the results useless. The accumulation of errors over time, limits the duration and therefore the performance of quantum algorithms. Thus, achieving quantum advantage the ability to perform computations on quantum computers significantly faster than with classical supercomputers, needs a solution to mitigate the detrimental impact of these errors and enable algorithms to scale.
Error mitigation aims to reduce the effect of errors on the outputs of circuits executed on noisy quantum devices. However, these improvements come at the cost of runtime overhead that increases with the number of two-qubit gates (circuit volume) in the circuit. To overcome this, Qedmas novel approach to error mitigation, and the Qedma Error Suppression and Error Mitigation (QESEM) product, requires exponentially less overhead compared to other methods and suppresses errors at the hardware level to run longer programs while maintaining reasonable runtimes, potentially accelerating the path to quantum advantage.
Below we detail how QESEM was used in conjunction with IonQs Aria device via Braket Direct to produce high-accuracy results for a variety of quantum chemistry and quantum materials applications. We also show how Braket Direct provided us with dedicated QPU access, ideally suited for QESEMs interactive workflow, as well as the ability to connect directly with IonQs hardware experts. Scientific guidance from IonQ was important for tailoring QESEM to make the best use of Aria, and for constructing novel quantum chemistry circuits for the demonstration. These included VQE and Hamiltonian simulation circuits on 12 qubits, leveraging the high connectivity of IonQs devices. The results presented in this blog post demonstrate how users can push the boundaries of quantum chemistry and materials applications accessible on IonQs devices with Qedmas error mitigation, powered by Braket Direct.
QESEM can be used with any quantum program. When applied, QESEM first carries out a hardware-specific characterization protocol. According to the deduced error model, QESEM recompiles the input quantum circuit to a set of circuits that are sent to the device; the measurement outcomes are then classically post-processed, returning high-accuracy outputs, as we demonstrate below. The characterization process underlying QESEM ensures that its results are unbiased for any circuit. This means that QESEM provides results whose accuracy is only limited by the QPU time allocated for execution. In contrast, many error mitigation methods are algorithm-specific or heuristic. Algorithm-specific methods are not designed to mitigate generic errors across any quantum circuit, whereas heuristic methods generically converge to an incorrect (biased) output [1]. Relative to the leading unbiased and algorithm-agnostic methods, QESEMs QPU time is exponentially shorter as a function of circuit volume, as shown below.
We applied QESEM to three circuits from various applications and with a range of structural circuit properties (see Table 1). Specifically, we created a reservation via Braket Direct to get dedicated device access to IonQs Aria device. The reservation enabled the entire QESEM workflow to execute within a single working session where exclusive QPU access avoided the need to wait in line, and optimized throughput resulted in the shortest possible runtime. Along with the inherent stability of the physical properties of IonQs Aria, the reduced runtime ensured minimal drift of the system parameters during our experiments. This allowed QESEM to obtain an efficient description of the noise model during the execution.
Table 1: Properties of the circuits we demonstrated QESEM on.
Compared to the number of qubits they employ, all three circuits are comprised of a relatively high number of unique two-qubit gates between different pairs of qubits. This is made possible by the all-to-all qubit connectivity of IonQs hardware, which can calibrate an entangling gate between any pair of qubits; each of those gates is uniquely facilitated through the vibrational modes of the ion chain encoding the qubits. On the one hand, high qubit connectivity allows the compilation of complex circuits without incurring significant depth overhead. In contrast, on devices with lower connectivity, e.g., square lattice, applying a two-qubit gate to qubits that are not connected requires additional SWAP gates. On the other hand, the ability to run a large number of two-qubit gates poses a challenge for any characterization-based error mitigation method, since the noise model becomes very complicated. To address this challenge, QESEM used a characterization model specifically tailored to trapped ions, efficiently describing the errors of trapped-ion devices using a tractable noise model.
The first two circuits are examples of the VQE algorithm, which aims to find the ground state energy of a quantum many-body system, e.g., a molecule [1]. The specific examples we ran were designed to find the ground states of the NaH and O2 molecules. The third circuit realized a Hamiltonian simulation algorithm, implementing the time evolution of a quantum spin-lattice. We first describe the VQE circuits and focus on the oxygen molecule O2. Our efforts concentrated there due to its relevance to industrial and biological processes, while striking a balance between complexity and tractability making it a robust test for todays quantum devices. Moreover, the O2 experiment used a circuit volume of 99 two-qubit gates, larger than all VQE circuits featured in a recent experimental survey [3].
Typically, the presence of errors severely limits the size of VQE circuits because of the need for particularly accurate results. The ability to leverage the all-to-all connectivity of trapped-ion devices to reduce gate overhead is therefore well suited to this type of algorithm. With Braket Direct, we were able to incorporate expert guidance from IonQ on how to maximize the benefit of using their high connectivity and compile directly to their native gates to optimize the VQE circuits for the Aria device and produce the best results.
IonQ brought their quantum chemistry expertise to the table, equipping Qedma with circuits precisely crafted for the O2 molecule. Designed to mirror full configuration interaction results [4], these circuits included a chemistry-inspired Ansatz [5] supplemented by particle-conserving unitaries, which reflects the underlying molecular electronic structure. Additionally, IonQ undertook the classical optimization of the circuit parameters, setting the ground work for Qedma to apply QESEM effectively during the final energy assessment.
QESEM significantly enhanced the accuracy of the ground-state energy of the O2 molecule. Running this VQE circuit on Aria without error mitigation and measuring the ground state energy yields the result shown in red in Figure 1. This unmitigated result, i.e. executed without error mitigation, misses its mark by roughly 30%. In black, we show the exact energy, as it would have been obtained from the VQE circuit had it been run on a noise-free, i.e., ideal device. Using QESEM, the error mitigated energy (blue) closely matches the exact result up to the statistical error bar corresponding to the finite mitigation time. Moreover, the error bar accompanying the mitigated result is small enough to indicate a very clear statistical separation from the unmitigated result.
Figure 1: The ground state energy of the O2 molecule as obtained from running the VQE circuit on IonQ Aria without error mitigation (red) and with QESEM (blue) compared to the exact result that would be obtained on an ideal, i.e., noise-free, device.
Aside from the ground state energy, this VQE circuit also allows us to learn about the electronic structure of the O2 molecule. The states of individual qubits encode the electronic occupations of the molecules orbitals. A qubit in the 0 state signifies an empty orbital whereas the 1 state corresponds to occupation by a single electron. Moreover, from the correlations between pairs of qubits, we can extract the correlations between occupations. Some examples of occupations and their correlations can be seen in Figure 2. Again, all mitigated values match the ideal values up to the statistical error bars while the noisy results are, in most cases, far off.
Figure 2. Ideal, noisy and mitigated values for example orbitals occupations and their correlations.
Similar results for the NaH VQE circuit are shown in Figure 3. While the NaH circuit is narrower, i.e., involves fewer qubits, it requires a full qubit-connectivity graph and is of a comparable depth. Since this circuit only makes use of 6 qubits, the number of all possible outcomes is not very large, allowing the depiction of the full probability distribution of measurement outcomes (see Figure 3). Excellent agreement of the mitigated results with the ideal outcome can be seen for all bitstrings, demonstrating QESEMs capability to provide an unbiased estimate for any output observable of interest.
Figure 3: Results for the NaH VQE circuit. Left: The probability distribution of all possible measurement outcomes. Right: Observables of interest, e.g., the ground state energy. QESEM results (blue) reproduce the ideal values (black) up to statistical accuracy while the unmitigated results (red) are off.
In the study of quantum materials, there are two fundamental questions of interest: energetics and dynamics. The VQE algorithm presented above addresses the question of energetics. In contrast, the Hamiltonian simulation algorithm computes the time evolution of the quantum state of the material, i.e., its dynamics. The quantum circuit approximates the continuous dynamics by small discrete time evolution steps [6].
Spin Hamiltonians are widely used as models for quantum materials where the electrons are in fixed positions but interact magnetically. For this demonstration, we chose a canonical Hamiltonian, the so-called XY model with a perpendicular magnetic field [7]. The 12 spins, encoded by 12 qubits, reside on the sites of a three-by-four triangular lattice with periodic boundary conditions (see Figure 4). Under these conditions, the Hamiltonian simulation circuit requires high connectivity between the qubits to be compiled compactly. Beyond being a highly demanding benchmark, the Hamiltonian we simulated also illustrates rich quantum physical phenomena. The XY model is a model of strongly interacting bosons, as in a Josephson junction array. On a triangular lattice, this type of system can form an exotic phase of matter called a Supersolid [8].
Figure 4: Hamiltonian simulation. Left: the simulated triangular spin lattice. Colors represent different observables of interest the magnetization of individual spins (gray), and correlations between magnetizations of different spin patterns. Right: ideal, noisy and mitigated values for the different observables
Figure 4 shows the values of various observables of physical interest after one time-step (consisting of 72 two-qubit gates) is performed to an initial state where all spins, i.e., qubits, are oriented along the X direction. From left to right, these observables are the projections onto the X direction of the magnetization of single spins, and correlations of spin magnetizations along interaction bonds, lattice plaquettes, and strings of spins that envelop the lattice in one of its directions. Examples of each appear on the top panel in matching colors. These observables indicate the strength of various magnetic properties of the model. For each observable, we present the exact expectation values in black, the noisy unmitigated values in red, and the error mitigated results using QESEM in blue. Again, QESEM results reproduce the ideal values up to statistical accuracy, while the unmitigated results are statistically well-separated from both.
While we presented only a few specific examples, QESEM can be applied to any quantum circuit for which error-free results are desired. It is meticulously designed to optimize the accuracy-to-runtime tradeoff inherent to error mitigation methods. In particular, QESEMs QPU time, at a given statistical accuracy, scales exponentially better as a function of the volume of the target circuit compared to competing unbiased error mitigation protocols. For instance, a circuit with 120 two-qubit gates, run on a trapped-ion device with 99% two-qubit gate fidelity, would take 90 minutes to execute to 90% accuracy using QESEM, which can be easily completed within a two-hour device reservation using Braket Direct. The same circuit, executed with the leading competing unbiased and algorithm-generic error mitigation technique, Probabilistic Error Cancellation [9, 10], would take over a month.
Error mitigation is essential for executing cutting-edge applications on near-term quantum devices [1]. While the problems discussed in this blog can be simulated classically, QESEM enables accurate, error-free execution of large circuits increasing the number of two-qubit gates that can be utilized by more than an order of magnitude compared to unmitigated execution at the same level of accuracy.
Figure 5 shows the circuit volumes accessible with QESEM on trapped-ion devices. With expected near-future improvements in hardware fidelities and qubit counts, QESEM could enable executing generic quantum circuits faster than a supercomputer performing a state-vector simulation of the same circuit. Achieving this milestone will spur further exploration of applications requiring simulations of quantum systems, such as the design of novel materials.
Figure 5: accessible circuit volumes with QESEM on ion traps, assuming a desired accuracy of 90%. Active volume denotes the number of two-qubit gates within the circuit that affect the observable of interest. Here it is measured in terms of IonQs MlmerSrensen (MS) entangling gates. The black line estimates the time it would take a supercomputer to perform a state-vector simulation for a square circuit with the corresponding circuit volume. A square circuit consists of a sequence of layers in which each qubit participates in an MS gate, and the number of layers equals to the number of qubits (width=depth).
To learn more about Qedma and QESEM, visit Qedmas website. To further accelerate your research with dedicated access to quantum hardware including IonQs latest Forte QPU, check out the Braket Direct documentation or navigate to the AWS Management Console.
The content and opinions in this blog are those of the third-party authors and AWS is not responsible for the content or accuracy of this blog.
[1] Quantum Error Mitigation, https://arxiv.org/abs/2210.00921 (2022) [2] A variational eigenvalue solver on a photonic quantum processor, https://www.nature.com/articles/ncomms5213 (2014) [3] Orbital-optimized pair-correlated electron simulations on trapped-ion quantum computers https://www.nature.com/articles/s41534-023-00730-8 (2023) [4] Molecular Electronic-Structure Theory; John Wiley & Sons (2014) [5] Universal quantum circuits for quantum chemistry, https://doi.org/10.22331/q-2022-06-20-742 (2022) [6] Universal Quantum Simulators, https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.273.5278.1073 (1996) [7] Boson localization and the superfluid-insulator transition, https://journals.aps.org/prb/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevB.40.546 (1989) [8] Superfluids and supersolids on frustrated two-dimensional lattices, https://journals.aps.org/prb/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevB.55.3104 (1997) [9] Probabilistic error cancellation with sparse PauliLindblad models on noisy quantum processors, https://www.nature.com/articles/s41567-023-02042-2 (2023) [10] Efficiently improving the performance of noisy quantum computers, https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.10672 (2022)
Go here to read the rest:
Enabling state-of-the-art quantum algorithms with Qedma's error mitigation and IonQ, using Braket Direct | Amazon ... - AWS Blog
- Quantum Machines and Hamamatsu Photonics Forge Partnership for Enhanced Quantum Computing Control - Quantum Computing Report - May 1st, 2024 [May 1st, 2024]
- Keysight Introduces Industry-First Testing Solution for Post-Quantum Cryptography - Quantum Computing Report - May 1st, 2024 [May 1st, 2024]
- Australia bets on US startup that aims to build the first massive quantum computer - Semafor - May 1st, 2024 [May 1st, 2024]
- Australia just made a billion-dollar bet on building the world's first 'useful' quantum computer in Brisbane. Will it pay off? - The Conversation - May 1st, 2024 [May 1st, 2024]
- Japan to expand export restrictions on semiconductor and quantum computing technology - DatacenterDynamics - May 1st, 2024 [May 1st, 2024]
- Harnessing quantum information to advance computing - Nature.com - May 1st, 2024 [May 1st, 2024]
- University of Sydney Secures $18.4 Million AUD ($12 Million USD) Government Funding for National Quantum Innovation Hub - Quantum Computing Report - May 1st, 2024 [May 1st, 2024]
- HSBC and PayPal join group pioneering quantum-safe cryptography | bobsguide - Bobsguide - May 1st, 2024 [May 1st, 2024]
- Q-Day approaching: Can Ethereum survive a quantum emergency? - Cointelegraph - May 1st, 2024 [May 1st, 2024]
- Rigetti Computing Launches the Novera QPU Partner Program - HPCwire - May 1st, 2024 [May 1st, 2024]
- Is quantum computing an enabler for the decarbonisation of aviation? - Airbus - April 26th, 2024 [April 26th, 2024]
- Quantum Computing Meets Genomics: The Dawn of Hyper-Fast DNA Analysis - SciTechDaily - April 26th, 2024 [April 26th, 2024]
- Steady progress in approaching quantum advantage | McKinsey - McKinsey - April 26th, 2024 [April 26th, 2024]
- Rigetti Computing Delivers Novera QPU to Horizon Quantum Computing for Singapore-Based Hardware Testbed - GlobeNewswire - April 26th, 2024 [April 26th, 2024]
- John Martinis on Bridging Theory & Reality in Quantum Computing - The Quantum Insider - April 26th, 2024 [April 26th, 2024]
- NVIDIA is helping Japan build their bleeding-edge ABCI-Q quantum supercomputer with HPC and AI - TweakTown - April 26th, 2024 [April 26th, 2024]
- 3 Quantum Computing Stocks to Buy Now: Q2 Edition - InvestorPlace - April 26th, 2024 [April 26th, 2024]
- Compact Quantum Light Processing: Time-Bending Optical Computing Breakthrough - SciTechDaily - April 26th, 2024 [April 26th, 2024]
- Springing simulations forward with quantum computing - Phys.org - April 26th, 2024 [April 26th, 2024]
- MIT scientists tune the entanglement structure in an array of qubits - MIT News - April 26th, 2024 [April 26th, 2024]
- Chaotic Links Theory: Exploring the Intersection of Classical Cryptography and Quantum Potentiality - hackernoon.com - April 26th, 2024 [April 26th, 2024]
- Quantum Computing Stocks: An Investment in the Future - Value the Markets - April 26th, 2024 [April 26th, 2024]
- UK Tightens Controls on Quantum Computing Exports And Cryogenics Firms Could Feel The Chill - The Quantum Insider - April 26th, 2024 [April 26th, 2024]
- Pasqal and Welinq Partner to Develop Quantum Interconnects - High-Performance Computing News Analysis - insideHPC - April 26th, 2024 [April 26th, 2024]
- Quantum Computing, Inc. (QCi) Breaks Ground with Underwater LiDAR Prototype - Quantum Computing Report - April 26th, 2024 [April 26th, 2024]
- Quantum Cloud Computing Secured in New Breakthrough at Oxford - TechRepublic - April 26th, 2024 [April 26th, 2024]
- Researchers Achieve Major Advancement in Quantum Technology - AZoQuantum - April 26th, 2024 [April 26th, 2024]
- Xanadu and SC Quantum Partner to Enhance Quantum Education and Research in the Southeast U.S. - Quantum Computing Report - April 18th, 2024 [April 18th, 2024]
- 3 Steps Businesses Should Take to Prepare for Quantum Computing Disruption - TechSpective - April 18th, 2024 [April 18th, 2024]
- How Thin Film Lithium Niobate (TFLN) Will Power the Next generation of Coherent Ising Machines - Quantum Computing Report - April 18th, 2024 [April 18th, 2024]
- Quantum computing: a new frontier for the broadcast and media industry - RedShark News - April 18th, 2024 [April 18th, 2024]
- Navigating the Next Frontier: The Future of AI, Machine Learning, Quantum Computing, and Advanced - Medium - April 18th, 2024 [April 18th, 2024]
- Xanadu and South Carolina Quantum Establish Partnership to Build the Quantum Workforce of Tomorrow - HPCwire - April 18th, 2024 [April 18th, 2024]
- Quantum Computing Fair: Shaping the future world of Defence - Royal Air Force - April 18th, 2024 [April 18th, 2024]
- Researchers create 'quantum drums' to store qubits one step closer to groundbreaking internet speed and security - Tom's Hardware - April 18th, 2024 [April 18th, 2024]
- AI and Quantum Computing: High Risks or Big Boons to Fintech? - InformationWeek - April 18th, 2024 [April 18th, 2024]
- Unlocking the quantum future - MIT News - March 20th, 2024 [March 20th, 2024]
- Verifying the Work of Quantum Computers - Caltech - March 20th, 2024 [March 20th, 2024]
- Quantum Computing Could Destroy Bitcoin in 27 Years - BeInCrypto - March 20th, 2024 [March 20th, 2024]
- Surviving the quantum apocalypse with fully homomorphic encryption - Help Net Security - March 20th, 2024 [March 20th, 2024]
- NVIDIA Amplifies Quantum Computing Ecosystem with New CUDA-Q Integrations and Partnerships at GTC - HPCwire - March 20th, 2024 [March 20th, 2024]
- Quantum groups combine to drive European quantum computing sector - Optics.org - March 20th, 2024 [March 20th, 2024]
- Quantum Computing Breakthrough: Scientists Develop New Photonic Approach That Works at Room Temperature - SciTechDaily - March 20th, 2024 [March 20th, 2024]
- UMass Amherst Researchers Join $26 M Quantum Computing Effort to Build Internet of the Future - AZoQuantum - March 20th, 2024 [March 20th, 2024]
- Quantum Computing for Everyone | Events | What's On | The University of Aberdeen - University of Aberdeen - March 20th, 2024 [March 20th, 2024]
- Quantum Computing in Africa: A Journey to the 1960s Era - Tech in Africa - March 20th, 2024 [March 20th, 2024]
- Delinea Announces Industry-First Quantum-Safe Encryption to Secure Privileged Accounts in the Post-Quantum ... - PR Newswire - March 20th, 2024 [March 20th, 2024]
- Where are the Worldwide Quantum Networking Testbeds? - Quantum Computing Report - March 20th, 2024 [March 20th, 2024]
- TRUMPF to Harness HLRS's Hawk and Hunter Supercomputers for Advanced AI and Quantum Computing Simulations - HPCwire - March 20th, 2024 [March 20th, 2024]
- Designing Infrastructure to Protect Quantum Information - AZoQuantum - March 20th, 2024 [March 20th, 2024]
- UMass Amherst researchers join $26 million quantum computing effort to build internet of the future - EurekAlert - March 20th, 2024 [March 20th, 2024]
- Southampton to drive UK Quantum computing capability - Labmate Online - March 20th, 2024 [March 20th, 2024]
- NVIDIA Announces New Supercomputer Projects, a Quantum Cloud, Academic Initiatives, and PQC Acceleration at Its Annual GTC Conference - Quantum... - March 20th, 2024 [March 20th, 2024]
- Center for Quantum Networks welcomes UMASS Amherst in $26m quantum networking deal - Innovation News Network - March 20th, 2024 [March 20th, 2024]
- The 3 Most Undervalued Quantum Computing Stocks to Buy in March 2024 - InvestorPlace - March 18th, 2024 [March 18th, 2024]
- Fault Tolerant Quantum Computers Will Arrive Earlier Than We Original Thought - Quantum Computing Report - March 18th, 2024 [March 18th, 2024]
- Beyond AI: How Nvidia is helping scale quantum computing - VentureBeat - March 18th, 2024 [March 18th, 2024]
- Machine Learning, Quantum Computing Can Transform Health Care, Including Diagnosing Pneumonia - Carnegie Mellon University - March 18th, 2024 [March 18th, 2024]
- QC's Finest: The 3 Most Fundamentally Sound Quantum Computing Stocks - InvestorPlace - March 18th, 2024 [March 18th, 2024]
- Rigetti Computing, Inc. Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2023 Financial Results - The Quantum Insider - March 18th, 2024 [March 18th, 2024]
- The Race to Build a Quantum Computer Is Paved With Gold - Says IDTechEx - PR Newswire - March 18th, 2024 [March 18th, 2024]
- Accelerating the Development of New Molecules - Promethium to Empower ML Models for Drug Discovery Using ... - PR Newswire - March 18th, 2024 [March 18th, 2024]
- Does Quantum Computing Inc (QUBT) Have What it Takes to be in Your Portfolio Monday? - InvestorsObserver - March 18th, 2024 [March 18th, 2024]
- European MPs sound alarm over quantum computing's encryption threat - Innovation Origins - March 18th, 2024 [March 18th, 2024]
- UMass Amherst Researchers Join $26 Million Quantum Computing Initiative to Shape the Future of the Internet - India Education Diary - March 18th, 2024 [March 18th, 2024]
- Quantum Computing and Networking Poised to Revolutionize Cryptography - BroadbandBreakfast.com - March 18th, 2024 [March 18th, 2024]
- Growing concenrs about quantum computers' ability to break commonly used encryption - NL Times - March 18th, 2024 [March 18th, 2024]
- Navigating the Future with Nokia Bell Labs: Pioneering Innovations in 6G, Quantum Computing, and Lunar Communications - Telecom Reseller - March 18th, 2024 [March 18th, 2024]
- Never-Repeating Patterns of Tiles Can Safeguard Quantum Information - WIRED - March 18th, 2024 [March 18th, 2024]
- Japanese joint research group win Prime Minister's Award with ultra high-performance computing platform using jointly ... - Fujitsu - March 18th, 2024 [March 18th, 2024]
- Rigetti Computing Reports Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2023 Results - GlobeNewswire - March 18th, 2024 [March 18th, 2024]
- Already Up 104% YTD, Wall Street Predicts This Quantum Computing Stock Will Surge Another 58% - Barchart - March 18th, 2024 [March 18th, 2024]
- IBM agreement boosts USC's quantum computing leadership - University of Southern California - March 13th, 2024 [March 13th, 2024]
- QMware Announces Collaboration With NVIDIA And Oracle to Advance Hybrid Quantum Computing for Enterprises - The Quantum Insider - March 13th, 2024 [March 13th, 2024]
- QMware Announces Collaboration with NVIDIA and Oracle to Advance Hybrid Quantum Computing for Enterprises - HPCwire - March 13th, 2024 [March 13th, 2024]
- What Are The Opportunities Presented by Quantum Computing? - USC Viterbi | School of Engineering - USC Viterbi School of Engineering - March 13th, 2024 [March 13th, 2024]
- Eviden explores energy advantages in near-term quantum computing systems through research partnerships - GlobeNewswire - March 13th, 2024 [March 13th, 2024]
- Does Quantum Computing (NASDAQ:QUBT) Have A Healthy Balance Sheet? - Simply Wall St - March 13th, 2024 [March 13th, 2024]
- Quantum computing isnt magicbut could be the next big thing, say executives at the Montgomery Summit - Fortune - March 13th, 2024 [March 13th, 2024]
- QMware Collaborates with NVIDIA and Oracle to Advance Hybrid Quantum Computing for Enterprises - Quantum Computing Report - March 13th, 2024 [March 13th, 2024]
Tags: