Quantum Computing in the NISQ era and beyond Quantum
Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) technology will be available in the near future. Quantum computers with 50-100 qubits may be able to perform tasks which surpass the capabilities of today's classical digital computers, but noise in quantum gates will limit the size of quantum circuits that can be executed reliably. NISQ devices will be useful tools for exploring many-body quantum physics, and may have other useful applications, but the 100-qubit quantum computer will not change the world right away - we should regard it as a significant step toward the more powerful quantum technologies of the future. Quantum technologists should continue to strive for more accurate quantum gates and, eventually, fully fault-tolerant quantum computing.
[1] P. W. Shor, Polynomial-time algorithms for prime factorization and discrete logarithms on a quantum computer, SIAM Rev. 41, 303-332 (1999), 10.1137/S0036144598347011. https://doi.org/10.1137/S0036144598347011
[2] A. P. Lund, M. J. Bremner, and T. C. Ralph, Quantum sampling problems, BosonSampling, and quantum supremacy, npj Quantum Information 3: 15 (2017), arXiv:1702.03061, 10.1038/s41534-017-0018-2. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41534-017-0018-2 arXiv:1702.03061
[3] A. W. Harrow and A. Montanaro, Quantum computational supremacy, Nature 549, 203-209 (2017), 10.1038/nature23458. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature23458
[4] S. P. Jordan, Quantum algorithm zoo, http://math.nist.gov/quantum/zoo/. http://math.nist.gov/quantum/zoo/
[5] A. Montanaro, Quantum algorithms: an overview, npj Quantum Information, 15023 (2016), arXiv:1511.04206, 10.1038/npjqi.2015.23. https://doi.org/10.1038/npjqi.2015.23 arXiv:1511.04206
[6] L. Grover, Quantum mechanics helps in searching for a needle in a haystack, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 325 (1997), arXiv:quant-ph/9706033, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.325. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.325 arXiv:quant-ph/9706033
[7] C. H. Bennett, E. Bernstein, G. Brassard, and U. Vazirani, Strengths and weaknesses of quantum computing, SIAM J. Comput. 26, 1510-1523 (1997), arXiv:quant-ph/9701001, 10.1137/S0097539796300933. https://doi.org/10.1137/S0097539796300933 arXiv:quant-ph/9701001
[8] R. B. Laughlin and D. Pines, The theory of everything, PNAS 97, 28-31 (2000), 10.1073/pnas.97.1.28. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.97.1.28
[9] R. P. Feynman, Simulating physics with computers, Int. J. Theor. Physics 21, 467-488 (1982).
[10] D. Gottesman, An introduction to quantum error correction and fault-tolerant quantum computation, Proceedings of Symposia in Applied Matthematics 68 (2010), arXiv:0904.2557. arXiv:0904.2557
[11] S. Boixo, S. V. Isakov, V. N. Smelyansky, R. Babbush, N. Ding, Z. Jiang, M. J. Bremner, J. M. Martinis, and H. Neven, Characterizing quantum supremacy in near-term devices, Nature Physics 14, 595-600 (2018), arXiv:1608.00263 (2016), 10.1038/s41567-018-0124-x. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-018-0124-x arXiv:1608.00263
[12] S. Aaronson and L. Chen, Complexity-theoretic foundations of quantum supremacy experiments, arXiv:1612.05903 (2017). arXiv:1612.05903
[13] E. Pednault, J. A. Gunnels, G. Nannicini, L. Horesh, T. Magerlein, E. Solomonik, and R. Wisnieff, Breaking the 49-qubit barrier in the simulation of quantum circuits, arXiv:1710.05867 (2017). arXiv:1710.05867
[14] C. J. Ballance, T. P. Harty, N. M. Linke, M. A. Sepiol, and D. M. Lucas, High-fidelity quantum logic gates using trapped-ion hyperfine qubits, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 060504 (2016), arXiv:1512.04600, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.060504. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.060504 arXiv:1512.04600
[15] R. Barends, J. Kelly, A. Megrant, A. Veitia, D. Sank, E. Jeffrey, T. C. White, J. Mutus, A. G. Fowler, B. Campbell, Y. Chen, Z. Chen, B. Chiaro, A. Dunsworth, C. Neill, P. O'Malley, P. Roushan, A. Vainsencher, J. Wenner, A. N. Korotkov, A. N. Cleland, and J. M. Martinis, Superconducting quantum circuits at the surface code threshold for fault tolerance, Nature 508, 500-503 (2014), arXiv:1402.4848, 10.1038/nature13171. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13171 arXiv:1402.4848
[16] D. J. Bernstein, J. Buchmann, E. Dahmen, editors, Post-Quantum Cryptography, Springer (2009), 10.1007/978-3-540-88702-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-88702-7
[17] R. Allaume, C. Branciard, J. Bouda, T. Debuisschert, M. Dianati, N. Gisin, M. Godfrey, P. Grangier, T. Lnger, N. Ltkenhaus, C. Monyk, P. Painchault, M. Peev, A. Poppe, T. Pornin, J. Rarity, R. Renner, G. Ribordy, M. Riguidel, L. Salvail, A. Shields, H. Weinfurter, and A. Zeilinger, Using quantum key distribution for cryptographic purposes: a survey, Theoretical Computer Science 560, 62-81 (2014), arXiv:quant-ph/0701168, 10.1016/j.tcs.2014.09.018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcs.2014.09.018 arXiv:quant-ph/0701168
[18] S. Muralidharan, L. Li, J. Kim, N Ltkenhaus, M. D. Lukin, and L. Jiang, Efficient long distance quantum communication, Scientific Reports 6, 20463 (2016), arXiv:1509.08435, 10.1038/srep20463. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep20463 arXiv:1509.08435
[19] P. Bierhorst, E. Knill, S. Glancy, Y. Zhang, A. Mink, S. Jordan, A. Rommal, Y.-K. Liu, B. Christensen, S. W. Nam, M. J. Stevens, and L. K. Shalm, Experimentally generated randomness certified by the impossibility of superluminal signals, Nature 556, 223-226 (2018), arXiv:1803.06219, 10.1038/s41586-018-0019-0. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0019-0 arXiv:1803.06219
[20] Z. Brakerski, P. Christiano, U. Mahadev, U. Vazirani, and T. Vidick, Certifiable randomness from a single quantum device, arXiv:1804.00640 (2018). arXiv:1804.00640
[21] C. L. Degen, F. Reinhard, and P. Cappellaro, Quantum sensing, Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 035002 (2017), arXiv:1611.04691, 10.1103/RevModPhys.89.035002. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.89.035002 arXiv:1611.04691
[22] J. Preskill, Quantum computing and the entanglement frontier, 25th Solvay Conference on Physics (2011), arXiv:1203.5813. arXiv:1203.5813
[23] S. Khot, Hardness of approximation, Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians (2014).
[24] E. Farhi, J. Goldstone, and S. Gutmann, A quantum approximate optimization algorithm, arXiv:1411.4028 (2014). arXiv:1411.4028
[25] J. R. McClean, J. Romero, R. Babbush, and A. Aspuru-Guzik, The theory of variational hybrid quantum-classical algorithms, New J. Phys. 18, 023023 (2016), arXiv:1509.04279, 10.1038/ncomms5213. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms5213 arXiv:1509.04279
[26] D. A. Spielman and S.-H. Teng, Smoothed analysis of algorithms: why the simplex algorithm usually takes polynomial time, Journal of the ACM 51, 385-463 (2004), arXiv:cs/0111050, 10.1145/990308.990310. https://doi.org/10.1145/990308.990310 arXiv:cs/0111050
[27] Y. LeCun, Y. Bengio, and G. Hinton, Deep learning, Nature 521, 436-444 (2015), 10.1038/nature14539. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14539
[28] T. F. Rnnow, Z. Wang, J. Job, S. Boixo, S. V. Isakov, D. Wecker, J. M. Martinis, D. A. Lidar, and M. Troyer, Defining and detecting quantum speedup, Science 345, 420-424 (2014), 10.1126/science.1252319. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1252319
[29] S. Mandr, H. G. Katzgraber, and C. Thomas, The pitfalls of planar spin-glass benchmarks: raising the bar for quantum annealers (again), Quantum Sci. Technol. 2, 038501 (2017), arXiv:1703.00622, 10.1088/2058-9565/aa7877. https://doi.org/10.1088/2058-9565/aa7877 arXiv:1703.00622
[30] T. Albash and D. A. Lidar, Adiabatic quantum computing, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 015002 (2018), arXiv:1611.04471, 10.1103/RevModPhys.90.015002. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.90.015002 arXiv:1611.04471
[31] D. Aharonov, W. van Dam, J. Kempe, Z. Landau, S. Lloyd, and O. Regev, Adiabatic quantum computation is equivalent to standard quantum computation, SIAM Rev. 50, 755-787 (2008), arXiv:quant-ph/0405098. arXiv:quant-ph/0405098
[32] S. Bravyi, D. DiVincenzo, R. I. Oliveira, and B. M. Terhal, The complexity of stoquastic local Hamiltonian problems, Quant. Inf. Comp. 8, 0361-0385 (2008), arXiv:quant-ph/0606140. arXiv:quant-ph/0606140
[33] M. Jarret, S. P. Jordan, and B. Lackey, Adiabatic optimization versus diffusion Monte Carlo, Phys. Rev. A 94, 042318 (2016), arXiv:1607.03389, 10.1103/PhysRevA.94.042318. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.94.042318 arXiv:1607.03389
[34] A. D. King, J. Carrasquilla, I. Ozfidan, J. Raymond, E. Andriyash, A. Berkley, M. Reis, T. M. Lanting, R. Harris, G. Poulin-Lamarre, A. Yu. Smirnov, C. Rich, F. Altomare, P. Bunyk, J. Whittaker, L. Swenson, E. Hoskinson, Y. Sato, M. Volkmann, E. Ladizinsky, M. Johnson, J. Hilton, and M. H. Amin, Observation of topological phenomena in a programmable lattice of 1,800 qubits, arXiv:1803.02047 (2018). arXiv:1803.02047
[35] I. H. Kim, Noise-resilient preparation of quantum many-body ground states, arXiv:1703.00032 (2017). arXiv:1703.00032
[36] I. H. Kim and B. Swingle, Robust entanglement renormalization on a noisy quantum computer, arXiv:1711.07500 (2017). arXiv:1711.07500
[37] J. Biamonte, P. Wittek, N. Pancotti, P. Rebentrost, N. Wiebe, and S. Lloyd, Quantum machine learning, Nature 549, 195-202 (2017), arXiv:1611.09347, 10.1038/nature23474. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature23474 arXiv:1611.09347
[38] S. Aaronson, Read the fine print, Nature Physics 11, 291-293 (2015), 10.1038/nphys3272. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys3272
[39] X. Gao, Z. Zhang, and L. Duan, An efficient quantum algorithm for generative machine learning, arXiv:1711.02038 (2017). arXiv:1711.02038
[40] A. W. Harrow, A. Hassidim, and S. Lloyd, Quantum algorithm for linear systems of equations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 150502 (2009), arXiv:0811.3171, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.150502. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.150502 arXiv:0811.3171
[41] B. D. Clader, B. C. Jacobs, and C. R. Sprouse, Preconditioned quantum linear system algorithm, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 250504 (2013), arXiv:1301.2340, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.250504. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.250504 arXiv:1301.2340
[42] A. Montanaro and S. Pallister, Quantum algorithms and the finite element method, Phys. Rev. A 93, 032324 (2016), arXiv:1512.05903, 10.1103/PhysRevA.93.032324. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.93.032324 arXiv:1512.05903
[43] P. C. S. Costa, S. Jordan, and A. Ostrander, Quantum algorithm for simulating the wave equation, arXiv:1711.05394 (2017). arXiv:1711.05394
[44] I. Kerenidis and A. Prakash, Quantum recommendation systems, arXiv:1603.08675 (2016). arXiv:1603.08675
[45] E. Tang, A quantum-inspired classical algorithm for recommendation systems, Electronic Colloquium on Computational Complexity, TR18-12 (2018).
[46] F. G. S. L. Brando and K. Svore, Quantum speed-ups for semidefinite programming, Proceedings of FOCS 2017, arXiv:1609.05537 (2017). arXiv:1609.05537
[47] F. G. S. L. Brando, A. Kalev, T. Li, C. Y.-Y. Lin, K. M. Svore, and X. Wu, Exponential quantum speed-ups for semidefinite programming with applications to quantum learning, arXiv:1710.02581 (2017). arXiv:1710.02581
[48] M. Reiher, N. Wiebe, K. M. Svore, D. Wecker, and M. Troyer, Elucidating reaction mechanisms on quantum computers, PNAS 117, 7555-7560 (2017), arXiv:1605.03590, 10.1073/pnas.1619152114. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1619152114 arXiv:1605.03590
[49] D. Wecker, M. B. Hastings, N. Wiebe, B. K. Clark, C. Nayak, and M. Troyer, Solving strongly correlated electron models on a quantum computer, Phys. Rev. A 92, 062310 (2015), arXiv:1506.05135, 10.1103/PhysRevA.92.062318. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.92.062318 arXiv:1506.05135
[50] J. Olson, Y. Cao, J. Romero, P. Johnson, P.-L. Dallaire-Demers, N. Sawaya, P. Narang, I. Kivlichan, M. Wasielewski, A. Aspuru-Guzik, Quantum information and computation for chemistry, NSF Workshop Report, arXiv:1706.05413 (2017). arXiv:1706.05413
[51] H. Bernien, S. Schwartz, A. Keesling, H. Levine, A. Omran, H. Pichler, S. Choi, A. S. Zibrov, M. Endres, M. Greiner, V Vuleti, and M. D. Lukin, Probing many-body dynamics on a 51-atom quantum simulator, Nature 551, 579-584 (2017), arXiv:1707.04344, 10.1038/nature24622. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature24622 arXiv:1707.04344
[52] J. Zhang, G. Pagano, P. W. Hess, A. Kyprianidis, P. Becker, H. Kaplan, A. V. Gorshkov, Z.-X. Gong, and C. Monroe, Observation of a many-body dynamical phase transition with a 53-qubit quantum simulator, arXiv:1708.01044 (2017), 10.1038/nature24654. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature24654 arXiv:1708.01044
[53] E. T. Campbell, B. M. Terhal, and C. Vuillot, The steep road towards robust and universal quantum computation, arXiv:1612.07330 (2016). arXiv:1612.07330
[54] J. J. Wallman and J. Emerson, Noise tailoring for scalable quantum computation via randomized compiling, Phys. Rev. A 94, 052325 (2016), arXiv:1512:01098, 10.1103/PhysRevA.94.052325. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.94.052325 arXiv:1512
[55] J. Combes, C. Granade, C. Ferrie, and S. T. Flammia, Logical randomized benchmarking, arXiv:1702.03688 (2017). arXiv:1702.03688
[56] A. G. Fowler, M. Mariantoni, J. M. Martinis, and A. N. Cleland, Surface codes: towards practical large-scale quantum computation, Phys. Rev. A 86, 032324 (2012), arXiv:1208.0928, 10.1103/PhysRevA.86.032324. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.86.032324 arXiv:1208.0928
[57] S. Das Sarma, M. Freedman, and C. Nayak, Majorana zero modes and topological quantum computation, npj Quantum Information 1, 15001 (2015), arXiv:1501.02813, 10.1038/npjqi.2015.1. https://doi.org/10.1038/npjqi.2015.1 arXiv:1501.02813
[1] Vojtch Havlek, Antonio D. Crcoles, Kristan Temme, Aram W. Harrow, Abhinav Kandala, Jerry M. Chow, and Jay M. Gambetta, "Supervised learning with quantum-enhanced feature spaces", Nature 567 7747, 209 (2019).
[2] Abhinav Kandala, Kristan Temme, Antonio D. Crcoles, Antonio Mezzacapo, Jerry M. Chow, and Jay M. Gambetta, "Error mitigation extends the computational reach of a noisy quantum processor", Nature 567 7749, 491 (2019).
[3] Andrew D. King, Juan Carrasquilla, Jack Raymond, Isil Ozfidan, Evgeny Andriyash, Andrew Berkley, Mauricio Reis, Trevor Lanting, Richard Harris, Fabio Altomare, Kelly Boothby, Paul I. Bunyk, Colin Enderud, Alexandre Frchette, Emile Hoskinson, Nicolas Ladizinsky, Travis Oh, Gabriel Poulin-Lamarre, Christopher Rich, Yuki Sato, Anatoly Yu. Smirnov, Loren J. Swenson, Mark H. Volkmann, Jed Whittaker, Jason Yao, Eric Ladizinsky, Mark W. Johnson, Jeremy Hilton, and Mohammad H. Amin, "Observation of topological phenomena in a programmable lattice of 1,800 qubits", Nature 560 7719, 456 (2018).
[4] Seth Lloyd and Christian Weedbrook, "Quantum Generative Adversarial Learning", Physical Review Letters 121 4, 040502 (2018).
[5] Victor V. Albert, Kyungjoo Noh, Kasper Duivenvoorden, Dylan J. Young, R. T. Brierley, Philip Reinhold, Christophe Vuillot, Linshu Li, Chao Shen, S. M. Girvin, Barbara M. Terhal, and Liang Jiang, "Performance and structure of single-mode bosonic codes", Physical Review A 97 3, 032346 (2018).
[6] Panagiotis Kl. Barkoutsos, Jerome F. Gonthier, Igor Sokolov, Nikolaj Moll, Gian Salis, Andreas Fuhrer, Marc Ganzhorn, Daniel J. Egger, Matthias Troyer, Antonio Mezzacapo, Stefan Filipp, and Ivano Tavernelli, "Quantum algorithms for electronic structure calculations: Particle-hole Hamiltonian and optimized wave-function expansions", Physical Review A 98 2, 022322 (2018).
[7] Guillaume Verdon, Michael Broughton, Jarrod R. McClean, Kevin J. Sung, Ryan Babbush, Zhang Jiang, Hartmut Neven, and Masoud Mohseni, "Learning to learn with quantum neural networks via classical neural networks", arXiv:1907.05415.
[8] Pierre-Luc Dallaire-Demers and Nathan Killoran, "Quantum generative adversarial networks", Physical Review A 98 1, 012324 (2018).
[9] Gavin E. Crooks, "Gradients of parameterized quantum gates using the parameter-shift rule and gate decomposition", arXiv:1905.13311.
[10] Edward Grant, Marcello Benedetti, Shuxiang Cao, Andrew Hallam, Joshua Lockhart, Vid Stojevic, Andrew G. Green, and Simone Severini, "Hierarchical quantum classifiers", npj Quantum Information 4, 65 (2018).
[11] J. Preskill, "Simulating quantum field theory with a quantum computer", The 36th Annual International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory. 22-28 July 24 (2018).
[12] Zhang Jiang, Kevin J. Sung, Kostyantyn Kechedzhi, Vadim N. Smelyanskiy, and Sergio Boixo, "Quantum Algorithms to Simulate Many-Body Physics of Correlated Fermions", Physical Review Applied 9 4, 044036 (2018).
[13] Sam McArdle, Suguru Endo, Alan Aspuru-Guzik, Simon Benjamin, and Xiao Yuan, "Quantum computational chemistry", arXiv:1808.10402.
[14] Jianxin Chen, Fang Zhang, Cupjin Huang, Michael Newman, and Yaoyun Shi, "Classical Simulation of Intermediate-Size Quantum Circuits", arXiv:1805.01450.
[15] Yuxuan Du, Min-Hsiu Hsieh, Tongliang Liu, and Dacheng Tao, "The Expressive Power of Parameterized Quantum Circuits", arXiv:1810.11922.
[16] Tameem Albash and Daniel A. Lidar, "Demonstration of a Scaling Advantage for a Quantum Annealer over Simulated Annealing", Physical Review X 8 3, 031016 (2018).
[17] Ling Hu, Shu-Hao Wu, Weizhou Cai, Yuwei Ma, Xianghao Mu, Yuan Xu, Haiyan Wang, Yipu Song, Dong-Ling Deng, Chang-Ling Zou, and Luyan Sun, "Quantum generative adversarial learning in a superconducting quantum circuit", Science Advances 5 1, eaav2761 (2019).
[18] Aram Harrow and John Napp, "Low-depth gradient measurements can improve convergence in variational hybrid quantum-classical algorithms", arXiv:1901.05374.
[19] Guillaume Verdon, Jason Pye, and Michael Broughton, "A Universal Training Algorithm for Quantum Deep Learning", arXiv:1806.09729.
[20] Kentaro Heya, Yasunari Suzuki, Yasunobu Nakamura, and Keisuke Fujii, "Variational Quantum Gate Optimization", arXiv:1810.12745.
[21] Ramis Movassagh, "Quantum supremacy and random circuits", arXiv:1909.06210.
[22] Bryan O'Gorman, William J. Huggins, Eleanor G. Rieffel, and K. Birgitta Whaley, "Generalized swap networks for near-term quantum computing", arXiv:1905.05118.
[23] Yudong Cao, Jonathan Romero, Jonathan P. Olson, Matthias Degroote, Peter D. Johnson, Mria Kieferov, Ian D. Kivlichan, Tim Menke, Borja Peropadre, Nicolas P. D. Sawaya, Sukin Sim, Libor Veis, and Aln Aspuru-Guzik, "Quantum Chemistry in the Age of Quantum Computing", arXiv:1812.09976.
[24] Sebastien Piat, Nairi Usher, Simone Severini, Mark Herbster, Tommaso Mansi, and Peter Mountney, "Image classification with quantum pre-training and auto-encoders", International Journal of Quantum Information 16 8, 1840009-332 (2018).
[25] Eric R. Anschuetz, Jonathan P. Olson, Aln Aspuru-Guzik, and Yudong Cao, "Variational Quantum Factoring", arXiv:1808.08927.
[26] Brian Swingle and Nicole Yunger Halpern, "Resilience of scrambling measurements", Physical Review A 97 6, 062113 (2018).
[27] Xun Gao and Luming Duan, "Efficient classical simulation of noisy quantum computation", arXiv:1810.03176.
[28] Jonathan Romero and Alan Aspuru-Guzik, "Variational quantum generators: Generative adversarial quantum machine learning for continuous distributions", arXiv:1901.00848.
[29] Maria Schuld and Nathan Killoran, "Quantum machine learning in feature Hilbert spaces", arXiv:1803.07128.
[30] Swamit S. Tannu and Moinuddin K. Qureshi, "A Case for Variability-Aware Policies for NISQ-Era Quantum Computers", arXiv:1805.10224.
[31] Mark Fingerhuth, Tom Babej, and Christopher Ing, "A quantum alternating operator ansatz with hard and soft constraints for lattice protein folding", arXiv:1810.13411.
[32] Sumsam Ullah Khan, Ahsan Javed Awan, and Gemma Vall-Llosera, "K-Means Clustering on Noisy Intermediate Scale Quantum Computers", arXiv:1909.12183.
[33] Gushu Li, Yufei Ding, and Yuan Xie, "Tackling the Qubit Mapping Problem for NISQ-Era Quantum Devices", arXiv:1809.02573.
[34] A. Garcia-Saez and J. I. Latorre, "Addressing hard classical problems with Adiabatically Assisted Variational Quantum Eigensolvers", arXiv:1806.02287.
[35] Javier Gil Vidal and Dirk Oliver Theis, "Calculus on parameterized quantum circuits", arXiv:1812.06323.
[36] Kazuki Ikeda, Yuma Nakamura, and Travis S. Humble, "Application of Quantum Annealing to Nurse Scheduling Problem", Scientific Reports 9, 12837 (2019).
[37] Alwin Zulehner and Robert Wille, "Compiling SU(4) Quantum Circuits to IBM QX Architectures", arXiv:1808.05661.
[38] Juan Miguel Arrazola, Thomas R. Bromley, and Patrick Rebentrost, "Quantum approximate optimization with Gaussian boson sampling", Physical Review A 98 1, 012322 (2018).
[39] Zhang Jiang, Jarrod McClean, Ryan Babbush, and Hartmut Neven, "Majorana Loop Stabilizer Codes for Error Mitigation in Fermionic Quantum Simulations", Physical Review Applied 12 6, 064041 (2019).
[40] Salonik Resch and Ulya R. Karpuzcu, "Quantum Computing: An Overview Across the System Stack", arXiv:1905.07240.
[41] Sergey Bravyi, Dan Browne, Padraic Calpin, Earl Campbell, David Gosset, and Mark Howard, "Simulation of quantum circuits by low-rank stabilizer decompositions", arXiv:1808.00128.
[42] Zhong-Xiao Man, Yun-Jie Xia, and Rosario Lo Franco, "Temperature effects on quantum non-Markovianity via collision models", Physical Review A 97 6, 062104 (2018).
View post:
Quantum Computing in the NISQ era and beyond Quantum
- How a quantum computer can be used to actually steal your bitcoin in '9 minutes' - CoinDesk - April 19th, 2026 [April 19th, 2026]
- Quantum stocks on pace for a massive week after Nvidia debuts AI models to boost the tech - CNBC - April 19th, 2026 [April 19th, 2026]
- 3 Best Quantum Computing Stocks to Buy in April 2026, According to Analysts - TipRanks - April 19th, 2026 [April 19th, 2026]
- Why Quantum Computing Stock Was Blasting Higher This Week - Yahoo Finance - April 19th, 2026 [April 19th, 2026]
- Quantum-informed AI improves long-term turbulence forecasts while using far less memory - Phys.org - April 19th, 2026 [April 19th, 2026]
- Quantum Frontiers: Stony Brook Researchers Chart the Future of Technology - SBU News - April 19th, 2026 [April 19th, 2026]
- Quantum Jamming Explores the Truly Fundamental Principles of Nature - Quanta Magazine - April 19th, 2026 [April 19th, 2026]
- University of Illinois Renews Quantum Tech Partnership With IBM - govtech.com - April 19th, 2026 [April 19th, 2026]
- Oxford scientists achieve quantum gate teleportation between two quantum supercomputers - The Brighter Side of News - April 19th, 2026 [April 19th, 2026]
- Ferguson invests in Snohomish County to make it the Quantum Valley of the West - Lynnwood Times - April 19th, 2026 [April 19th, 2026]
- Alice & Bob Surpasses Hiring Targets Ahead of Schedule as Quantum Workforce Grows - HPCwire - April 19th, 2026 [April 19th, 2026]
- How IonQ Became the Most Exciting Name in Quantum Computing This Week - inc.com - April 19th, 2026 [April 19th, 2026]
- How a quantum computer can be used to actually steal your bitcoin in '9 minutes' - Cryptonews.net - April 19th, 2026 [April 19th, 2026]
- India built a fully indigenous quantum computer in just four months. But what exactly can it do, and does it actually stand up against what the US,... - April 19th, 2026 [April 19th, 2026]
- Bitcoin miners are dealing with this triple-threat. Im a seven worried, says mining CEO - dlnews.com - April 19th, 2026 [April 19th, 2026]
- The Korea Quantum Trade: Why Seoul Produced the Biggest Stock Moves on NVIDIA's Ising Launch - The Quantum Insider - April 19th, 2026 [April 19th, 2026]
- 3 Screaming Buys for the Upcoming AI-Quantum Supercycle - The Motley Fool - April 19th, 2026 [April 19th, 2026]
- Satoshi Nakamoto is one of the richest people in the world, but a proposed update could lock his Bitcoin away forever - dlnews.com - April 19th, 2026 [April 19th, 2026]
- A $2M quantum prize went to cancer-treatment research on IBM - Stock Titan - April 19th, 2026 [April 19th, 2026]
- Recent advances push Big Tech closer to the Q-Day danger zone - Ars Technica - April 19th, 2026 [April 19th, 2026]
- NVIDIA Launches Ising, the Worlds First Open AI Models to Accelerate the Path to Useful Quantum Computers - NVIDIA Newsroom - April 17th, 2026 [April 17th, 2026]
- Quantum computing stocks are back on the rise. Heres why IONQ, QBTS, RGTI, and QUBT are up - Fast Company - April 17th, 2026 [April 17th, 2026]
- How IBM Quantum is enabling healthcare and biology research - IBM - April 17th, 2026 [April 17th, 2026]
- Key quantum computing stock jumps 20% in a day, heres why - thestreet.com - April 17th, 2026 [April 17th, 2026]
- QuEras Yuval Boger on Quantum Timelines, Neutral-Atom Systems, and the Hybrid Future - MeriTalk - April 17th, 2026 [April 17th, 2026]
- Why Quantum Computing Stock Was Blasting Higher This Week - The Motley Fool - April 17th, 2026 [April 17th, 2026]
- Quantum Computing Advanced Packaging Market to 2035 Driven by Scaling Qubit Counts in Processors - IndexBox - April 17th, 2026 [April 17th, 2026]
- Quantum Fourier transform reaches 52 qubits, shattering the previous 27-qubit record - Phys.org - April 17th, 2026 [April 17th, 2026]
- Israel Is Winning the Quantum Race. It May Not Finish It - The Times of Israel - April 17th, 2026 [April 17th, 2026]
- University of Illinois and IBM renew quantum technology partnership at new Chicago headquarters - Chicago Tribune - April 17th, 2026 [April 17th, 2026]
- Quantum Computing's Crypto Threat Is Getting Realand Investors Are Piling In - MarketBeat - April 17th, 2026 [April 17th, 2026]
- Pulsar Helium: "Blue Gold" And Its Role In Quantum Computing (OTCMKTS:PSRHF) - Seeking Alpha - April 17th, 2026 [April 17th, 2026]
- Analysts Are Bullish on These 3 Quantum Computing Stocks Including One Youve Never Heard Of - Yahoo Finance - April 17th, 2026 [April 17th, 2026]
- Quantum photonics roadmap how Xanadu and PsiQuantum are looking to transfer qubits through beams of light - Tom's Hardware - April 17th, 2026 [April 17th, 2026]
- Quantum Computing Stocks Are Surging. New Models From Nvidia Are Helping Drive the Rally. - Investopedia - April 17th, 2026 [April 17th, 2026]
- IBM and University of Illinois Extend Discovery Accelerator Institute to Link Quantum and HPC Systems - HPCwire - April 17th, 2026 [April 17th, 2026]
- 15 months after crippling quantum computing stocks, Nvidia has sent the industry back into the stratosphere - Sherwood News - April 17th, 2026 [April 17th, 2026]
- VPNs Will Be Useless On A Quantum Internet Your Location Can Always Be Known - IFLScience - April 17th, 2026 [April 17th, 2026]
- UMD ARLIS Breaks Ground on $65M Facility to Support Applied Quantum and Intelligence Missions - HPCwire - April 17th, 2026 [April 17th, 2026]
- Moth Bets Quantum Computing Will Reach Consumers by Next World Quantum Day - The Quantum Insider - April 17th, 2026 [April 17th, 2026]
- BTQ Technologies Advances Quantum Reliability at Scale with First General Theory of Error Correction for Permutation-Invariant Codes - PR Newswire - April 17th, 2026 [April 17th, 2026]
- Famed investor Andrew Left says Nvidia has already crowned the big quantum stock winner - AOL.com - April 17th, 2026 [April 17th, 2026]
- Should You Buy Sell or Hold IonQ at $42 Is the Quantum Rally Back? - 24/7 Wall St. - April 17th, 2026 [April 17th, 2026]
- Quantum Clock Is Ticking: Colton Dillion on Building the Worldwide Quantum Computer Before Crypto Breaks - CCN.com - April 17th, 2026 [April 17th, 2026]
- IonQ, Nvidia Make Strides on World Quantum Day. Whats Lifting the Stocks. - Barron's - April 14th, 2026 [April 14th, 2026]
- Prediction: This Will Be Rigetti Computing's Stock Price in 1 Year - The Motley Fool - April 14th, 2026 [April 14th, 2026]
- D-Wave CEO Brings Commercial Quantum Computing to the Center of Global Economic and Technology Discussions at Semafor World Economy and QED-C Quantum... - April 14th, 2026 [April 14th, 2026]
- Quantum Computing vs Classical Computing Whats the Real Difference - The Quantum Insider - April 14th, 2026 [April 14th, 2026]
- How Columbus is leading the way on World Quantum Day - The Columbus Dispatch - April 14th, 2026 [April 14th, 2026]
- What Quantum Technology is and Why it Matters - The Quantum Insider - April 14th, 2026 [April 14th, 2026]
- Global Quantum Computing Market to Double by 2028, Reaching $3 Billion in Revenue, QED-C State of the Global Quantum Industry 2026 Report Finds - The... - April 14th, 2026 [April 14th, 2026]
- IQM Introduces AI-Based Calibration for Scalable Quantum Systems - The Quantum Insider - April 14th, 2026 [April 14th, 2026]
- France bets 500 million that quantum computing is the tech race Europe can finally win - The Next Web - April 14th, 2026 [April 14th, 2026]
- Bull and Equal1 Partner to Accelerate Hybrid Quantum-HPC Integration in Europe - HPCwire - April 14th, 2026 [April 14th, 2026]
- Nvidia slaps forehead: AI, thats what quantum needs! - theregister.com - April 14th, 2026 [April 14th, 2026]
- Today is World Quantum Day. Heres why it matters more than you think - Fast Company - April 14th, 2026 [April 14th, 2026]
- Bull and Equal1 Partner on Hybrid Quantum and HPC Integration - The Quantum Insider - April 14th, 2026 [April 14th, 2026]
- Intersection of humanities and quantum physics discussed during URIs World Quantum Day - The University of Rhode Island - April 14th, 2026 [April 14th, 2026]
- Rigetti Computing vs. IonQ: Diverging Trends in Quarterly Revenue - The Motley Fool - April 14th, 2026 [April 14th, 2026]
- Curious about quantum? Check out training options from ISC2, IBM, AWS and more - Network World - April 14th, 2026 [April 14th, 2026]
- Quantum computing is a once-in-a-lifetime opportunity for Canada. Here's how we can grow the industry at home - Financial Post - April 14th, 2026 [April 14th, 2026]
- Quantum-HPC convergence moves from theory to mission - SiliconANGLE - April 14th, 2026 [April 14th, 2026]
- Quantum Computing (NASDAQ:QUBT) Trading Up 11% - Here's Why - MarketBeat - April 14th, 2026 [April 14th, 2026]
- Quantum-Day Reality Check: Debunking the Quantum Threat to Crypto - CCN.com - April 14th, 2026 [April 14th, 2026]
- Gauge theory could give quantum error correction a boost - Physics World - April 14th, 2026 [April 14th, 2026]
- Guest Post: The Global Quantum Race is Here And Politicians Must Keep Up - The Quantum Insider - April 14th, 2026 [April 14th, 2026]
- IonQ, Rigetti, D-Wave and Nvidia Rise on World Quantum Day. What's Lifting the Stocks. - Moomoo - April 14th, 2026 [April 14th, 2026]
- IonQ Soars 18%, D-Wave Climbs 15%, Rigetti Gains 12%: Is the Quantum Super-Cycle Back in Full Force? - 24/7 Wall St. - April 14th, 2026 [April 14th, 2026]
- IQM Advances AI-Driven Agentic Calibration, Opening Quantum Computing to the Enterprise With NVIDIA Ising - PA Media - April 14th, 2026 [April 14th, 2026]
- The Best Quantum Computing Stocks to Buy Today - The Motley Fool - April 12th, 2026 [April 12th, 2026]
- Quantum Computing Is Beginning to Take Shape Here Are Three Recent Breakthroughs - Discover Magazine - April 12th, 2026 [April 12th, 2026]
- How Sensitive Are The Computers Of The Future? - Eurasia Review - April 12th, 2026 [April 12th, 2026]
- The Quantum Computing ETF That Could Be Bigger Than AI, and 2 Tech Funds Riding the Same Wave - 24/7 Wall St. - April 12th, 2026 [April 12th, 2026]
- Quantum Computing Threat to Bitcoin: Google Warns of Accelerated Timeline - News and Statistics - IndexBox - April 12th, 2026 [April 12th, 2026]
- Is Rigetti Computing's New 2-Qubit Gate Fidelity Record a Reason to Buy the Stock? - Yahoo Finance - April 12th, 2026 [April 12th, 2026]
- Quantum XChanges Eddy Zervigon on Q-Day, PQC Readiness, and How Federal CIOs Can Start the Migration Now - MeriTalk - April 12th, 2026 [April 12th, 2026]
- Guest Post: The UK's Quantum Ambitions Will Fail Without The Components to Make Them Real - The Quantum Insider - April 12th, 2026 [April 12th, 2026]
- The Quantum Computing ETF That Could Be Bigger Than AI, and 2 Tech Funds Riding the Same Wave - AOL.com - April 12th, 2026 [April 12th, 2026]
- Quantum threat looms far beyond Bitcoin, says Grayscale - thestreet.com - April 12th, 2026 [April 12th, 2026]
- How Should We Prepare for the Looming Quantum Encryption Apocalypse? - Gizmodo - April 12th, 2026 [April 12th, 2026]