The progressive revolution’s continued control of the ecclesial … – Catholic World Report
(Image: Sean Ang/Unsplash.com)
Vatican II was unique in the history of councils insofar as the crisis it was called to address was not a specific and well-defined theological heresy. Rather, it was called to address the crisis presented by modernity to the credibility of the entire Christian narrative tout court. The secular world looked at the Christ of the Church like an ancient palimpsest, in which an original manuscript had been written over with the layering of something new. In this case the claim was made that the historical Jesus had been glossed over and hidden away as the Church painted something new, which was a distorted image of Jesus as the divine guarantor of the Churchs power over even mundane terrestrial affairs.
Therefore, the challenge of modernity to the Churchs faith went far beyond this or that specific doctrine. It was instead a radical rejection of the very core of the Churchs narrative of who Jesus of Nazareth was and is and, therefore, of the very core of who God isif He even isand of what the Church is.
Therefore, and considering this totalizing challenge, Pope John XXIII, in calling the Council, did not task it with updating any particular doctrine in the light of specific theological challenges. Instead, he called on the Council to re-interrogate the entirety of the deposit of the faith and to propose that deposit in a new form, stripped of turgid baroque ecclesiastical language, and in a manner more Christological and evangelical.
To my knowledge, such a project had never before been attempted by the Church. And it does not take a great deal of perspicacity to see that the risks and potential rewards in such an endeavor were huge. Succeed and the Church might just yet reinvigorate her credibility as an authentic interpreter of who Jesus was; fail and the entire ecclesial edifice might collapse into a ragtag flotilla of lost refugees in uncharted waters. In many ways, therefore, Pope Johns mandate was the equivalent of a high-stakes gambler going all in with a poker hand that was not a slam dunk.
Pursuing this agenda, the dominant conciliar theology, in my view, was the Christocentric, theological anthropology of the ressourcement school, exemplified in Henri de Lubacs masterful book The Drama of Atheist Humanism, which found expression in the famous line in Gaudium et Spes 22: In reality it is only in the mystery of the Word made flesh that the mystery of man truly becomes clear.
The reinterpretive goal of the Council (and the linchpin as well of the entire pontificate of Pope John Paul II) was the trumping of modern secularisms co-optation of the mantle of true freedom and of a true humanism, by presenting to the world a deeper concept of freedom, grounded in a far more expansive and dignified Christocentric anthropology. It was no accident that Pope John Pauls first encyclical, Redemptor Hominis, was precisely an articulation of this expansive theological anthropology. And this more expansive view included a deeper and more authentic existentialism that emphasizes the natural human thirst for Godeven as modernity seeks to explain this thirst away as the epiphenomenal flotsam and jetsam of our neurochemistry.
Like all great and truly consequential ecumenical councils, it is taking time for this essentially ressourcement theological project of Vatican II to take root. One huge reason for this is that the very essence of the Council was an attempt at an interpretive theological retrieval of Jesus Christ as the Revelation of God. But this exercise in theological retrieval opened the door to a flood of alternative theological proposalse.g. transcendentalist, liberationist, feminist, and political theologies, et alwhich were far less traditional and far more accommodating to modernity than the ressourcement theology of the Council and its Christocentric project.
This brings us to where we are now as a Church. Ever since 1962, and in light of the Councils interpretive theological project, the dominating and overriding issue has been, Who is in control of the narrative of modern Catholicism? Who is in control of this project of theological reinterpretation?
Sadly, Vatican II failed to truly energize the Church. It led instead, and despite what it actually said, to all kinds of gnarled secular vines choking everything holy within the Church, mainly because, in the immediate aftermath of the Council, it was the progressive wing of the Church that succeeded in controlling the narrative of what the Council was all about. They had the advantage of a compliant and enthusiastic secular media world, the support of a Catholic theological guild seeking secular praise and approval as real members of the academic elite (thanks for nothing, Father Hesburgh!), and average Catholics of the post-war era eager to embrace and enter the new economic and political order of the liberal West as fully mainstreamed moderns.
It seemed, for a time, that the ressourcement camp had regained the upper hand in the pontificates of John Paul and Benedict. But their efforts were undermined and their success only partial, since the theological guild remained mostly in the hands of the progressives (with some noteworthy exceptions). Furthermore, many priests and prelates continued to drift with the current mood of our cultural social contract. The strategy of the progressives was to lay low, say the right things, and bide their time until the reins of Roman power were in the hands of a different pope.
If you were in the Catholic academy during this time, as I was, you heard this sentiment expressed in a thousand different ways but always with the same inflection: The conciliar project of modernization has been interrupted by reactionary popes stuck in the past, but the curve of history is on our side and our day will come.
In other words, the burning question of who controls the modern narrative of Catholicismwhich is the ecclesial issue of the past sixty yearsnever went away, despite popes John Paul and Benedict. What we are witnessing in the current torments within the Church is a struggle over irreducible, and therefore intractable, debates rooted in irreconcilable theological first principles. What we are witnessing is nothing short of a wholesale recrudescence of old guard, post-Vatican II progressivism, now linked to ever more transgressive attempts at revision, with a special focus on moral theology in particular. In 1968 it was Humanae Vitae and contraception; today it is LGBTQ everything, but the overall project is the same: The Church must change her moral theology, with an eye toward baptizing the sexual revolution, or it will perish.
And that brings me to the current pontificate. It is, in my view, best read as an attempt to revive a version of the controlling narrative of the Council as an aggiornamento of openness to modern Liberalism and not the aggiornamento of a prophetic engagement and critique. Seen in this light, Pope Francis is a useful tool for the progressives in that bigger project, regardless of his stated faithfulness to the Tradition. He is useful so long as papal authority is required in order to undermine or even destroy episcopal authority. This explains why, in the midst of all of this hoopla over a more synodal and less Roman Church, we see the contradiction of an increasing centralization of power in Rome as the progressives gradually gain control of the various Vatican dicasteries.
For example, we see the authority of the local bishop taken away when it comes to allowing for the Old Mass in Traditionis Custodes and its follow-up-up dubia, where Rome asserts authority even over the minutiae of what can and cannot be published about the Old Mass in parish bulletins. There is now a new Roman office for adjudicating the validity of various alleged supernatural phenomena such as Marian apparitions, which has been traditionally the provenance of the local bishop. And to cite one more example, among many possible candidates, there is the paradoxical spectacle of Rome micromanaging the machinations of the synodal process in order to insure, via the use of Roman authority, that all of our listening is properly curated.
Dont get me wrong. I am not saying that this is the agenda of Pope Francis. His words and official teachings show no evidence of this kind of institutional self-immolation where centralized authority is invoked in order to destroy centralized authorityor even, as in the extreme case of the German synodal way, the destruction of episcopal authority as such. What is puzzling in the extreme is that Pope Francis, despite the sound theology in his words, has empowered the progressive wing of the Church in very significant ways through his various episcopal appointments.
The prelates, priests, and theologians that Pope Francis apparently prefers and thus promotes, are cut out of the cloth of modern, performative transgression. The subjective categories of human experience, described in terms of a deeply psychologistic and sociologistic register, are now the privileged loci for where Gods Revelation takes place. They are often even viewed as standing in tension with, if not in outright contradiction to, the traditional loci of Incarnation, Scripture, and Tradition. It is not the traditional concept of the third person of the Holy Trinity that is being developed here, but rather a witchs brew of Feuerbach, Freud, Kinsey, and pop psychology of the angel pin/dream catcher boutique shop variety. And this new Church on the move theology is the apotheosis of the modern, rootless, therapeutic self so ably described by Carl R. Trueman in The Rise and Triumph of the Modern Self, and as such has the double distinction of being both false and boring.
But it is also propagandistic, since this Church on the move theology is almost always tendentious in its census-taking of opinions, the selectivity of which leaves the distinct impression that apparently only highly secularized people whose lives are a train wreck of constant anxiety, uncertainty, and undifferentiated anger, speak for the Holy Spirit.
Furthermore, this propaganda is emerging as an attempt at total narrative control via the redeployment of the slogans of the original failed Great Revolution back in the Sixties and Seventies. It also requires the airbrushing out of the enemies of the Great RevolutionPopes John Paul and Benedict, for instancebut in a manner that at least temporarily makes it seem that the Dear Leader, though surpassing them in his understanding of Vatican II, loved them very much.
An example of this airbrushing revisionism can be seen in some recent remarks from Cardinal Robert McElroy:
Pope Francis has made the pope and the papacy more immediate to people. It is not formal in the same way it had been before. Now, certainly Pope John Paul II had a wonderful way with people and engagement, but this is a different thing. This is speaking with groups, people, journalists, individuals, immediately, about the problems that exist in their lives and in the world and in the life of the Church. That sense of immediacy is a different kind of papacy. It is one of more direct encounter, person to person encounter, than it has been before.
I am so glad that a Cardinal of the Church finally had the nerve to point out that John Paul was still too formal in his dealing with people, and that he did not as a rule speak with personal immediacy to journalists and people about the problems in the world or in their personal lives. These words are so flamboyantly fallacious that they could only have been written by either an Apparatchik devoted to the methodology of the Big Lie (my vote) or someone who was in a coma during the 25 years of John Pauls pontificate. But it is necessary for the Great Revolution that the Dear Leader be shown in all respects superior, even to the point of not just a revision of history but a total rewriting of it altogether. That is not a tweaking of history. This is its destruction in the furtherance of the Revolution.
It is truly sad that the case of Vatican II and its narrative is being relitigated in this manner. The pontificates of John Paul and Benedict have given us a magisterially authoritative adjudication of the case. And if ecclesial sanity were in play then double jeopardy would apply and the case would be thrown out of court on those grounds. But there is a new chief justice on the bench, and he too wields the same judicial papal authority. So, here we are in court again.
But this is not good for the Church. Because a Church in a constant state of flux and suspension, a Church that is an endlessly open debating society, will eventually define itself into irrelevance.
If you value the news and views Catholic World Report provides, please consider donating to support our efforts. Your contribution will help us continue to make CWR available to all readers worldwide for free, without a subscription. Thank you for your generosity!
Click here for more information on donating to CWR. Click here to sign up for our newsletter.
Excerpt from:
The progressive revolution's continued control of the ecclesial ... - Catholic World Report
- Why Medicare for All is off the table for progressives, for now - Axios - May 9th, 2024 [May 9th, 2024]
- Fetterman: Progressives who dont vote will own tragedy of second Trump term - The Hill - May 9th, 2024 [May 9th, 2024]
- Pistol-Packin' Progressives - WSJ - The Wall Street Journal - May 9th, 2024 [May 9th, 2024]
- John Fetterman will speak at Florida Democratic Party gala. Progressives want it cancelled. - The Philadelphia Inquirer - May 9th, 2024 [May 9th, 2024]
- Mass. AG Campbell to helm progressives reproductive rights working group - MassLive.com - May 9th, 2024 [May 9th, 2024]
- Medicare for All absent from progressives' agenda - Axios - May 9th, 2024 [May 9th, 2024]
- Opinion | The progressives won again - Alabama Political Reporter - May 9th, 2024 [May 9th, 2024]
- Kennedy: Biden's In A Bit Of A Pickle With Progressives In His Party Right Now - FOX News Radio - May 9th, 2024 [May 9th, 2024]
- Dem Lawmaker Speaks Fierce Logic On Trump That He Wants Progressives To Hear - HuffPost - May 9th, 2024 [May 9th, 2024]
- Progressives are wrong on Hamas rape denials - Newsday - March 11th, 2024 [March 11th, 2024]
- Pramila Jayapal State of the Union preview: Joe Biden needs to speak to progressives. - Slate - March 11th, 2024 [March 11th, 2024]
- Schiffs big win sinks powerhouse progressives - MSNBC - March 11th, 2024 [March 11th, 2024]
- Progressives Explain What They Want Out Of Biden's Big Speech - Crooked - March 11th, 2024 [March 11th, 2024]
- Declaring the end of progressive San Francisco is a bit premature - 48 hills - 48 Hills - March 11th, 2024 [March 11th, 2024]
- Schiff Beats Out Split Progressives On Glide Path To California Senate Seat - TPM - March 11th, 2024 [March 11th, 2024]
- Progressive Wins and Losses in Texas' Super Tuesday Primary - Progress Texas - March 11th, 2024 [March 11th, 2024]
- Progressives Win Two Texas District Attorney Races - Yahoo! Voices - March 11th, 2024 [March 11th, 2024]
- AOC walks tightrope between moderates, progressives during State of the Union speech - wpde.com - March 11th, 2024 [March 11th, 2024]
- State of the Union 2024: Progressive 'Squad' turns up heat on Biden with demands ahead of speech - Washington Examiner - March 11th, 2024 [March 11th, 2024]
- Sen. John Fetterman says 'progressives left me' as he urges action to secure border: 'There is a crisis' - New York Post - January 22nd, 2024 [January 22nd, 2024]
- Fetterman continues his feud with progressive Democrats and says they 'left' him - Washington Examiner - January 22nd, 2024 [January 22nd, 2024]
- The quandary for progressive Jews - New York Daily News - January 22nd, 2024 [January 22nd, 2024]
- Why these progressives want ex-Rep. Andy Levin to run against Biden - Detroit News - January 22nd, 2024 [January 22nd, 2024]
- Letter: I favor conservatives over progressives - The Dispatch Argus - January 22nd, 2024 [January 22nd, 2024]
- Progressives in Iceland intensify campaign against Israels genocidal war in Gaza - Peoples Dispatch - January 22nd, 2024 [January 22nd, 2024]
- Editorial: Biden must resist call to appease progressives - Boston Herald - January 22nd, 2024 [January 22nd, 2024]
- Can Gov. Hochul stand up to progressives | Commentary | oleantimesherald.com - Olean Times Herald - January 22nd, 2024 [January 22nd, 2024]
- Green energy was 2023's biggest loser. Will Biden and progressives wake up in 2024? - Fox News - January 6th, 2024 [January 6th, 2024]
- What progressives get wrong about Winston Churchill - The Spectator - January 6th, 2024 [January 6th, 2024]
- Divided progressives are the best friends a Conservative leader could have - Toronto Star - January 6th, 2024 [January 6th, 2024]
- Burlington Progressives Pick Two More Candidates for March Ballot - Seven Days - January 6th, 2024 [January 6th, 2024]
- Are Young People Actually Progressive? - New York Magazine - January 6th, 2024 [January 6th, 2024]
- Democrats and progressives react to Gov. Scott's State of the State - WPTZ - January 6th, 2024 [January 6th, 2024]
- Let's Seize This Opportunity to Destroy Harvard! - The Intercept - January 6th, 2024 [January 6th, 2024]
- Is nothing good enough? Phoebe Maltz Bovy on why some progressives are mad at the young Israeli refusing to serve ... - The Canadian Jewish News - January 6th, 2024 [January 6th, 2024]
- Progressivism's Breakdown over Israel and Jews | Joshua Davidson | The Blogs - The Times of Israel - January 6th, 2024 [January 6th, 2024]
- Normalising the far right: a warning from Austria - Social Europe - January 3rd, 2024 [January 3rd, 2024]
- AIPAC vs. The Squad: Pro-Israel Group to Spend $100M to Target Progressives in 2024 - Democracy Now! - January 3rd, 2024 [January 3rd, 2024]
- Opinion | For Wisconsin progressives, 2023 was a very good year - The Capital Times - January 3rd, 2024 [January 3rd, 2024]
- Abundance Progressives: A New Ideological Shift - BNN Breaking - January 3rd, 2024 [January 3rd, 2024]
- Progressives need to get real about Trump, democracy and the Supreme Court - The Hill - December 30th, 2023 [December 30th, 2023]
- Democrats get ready to ditch the progressives - The Times - December 30th, 2023 [December 30th, 2023]
- Actor Brett Gelman joins Eretz Nehederet to skewer US progressives - The Times of Israel - December 30th, 2023 [December 30th, 2023]
- MICHELLE GOLDBERG: What's driving former progressives to the right? - Indiana Gazette - December 30th, 2023 [December 30th, 2023]
- Joe Biden Is a 'Dictator' and 'Worse Than Trump': Progressive Activist - Newsweek - December 30th, 2023 [December 30th, 2023]
- Greek progressives deal ruling New Democracy severe blow in local elections - EURACTIV - October 17th, 2023 [October 17th, 2023]
- Progressives, as much as Conservatives, ought to adjust their ideas to fit actual facts - Daily Kos - October 17th, 2023 [October 17th, 2023]
- Progressives face backlash over response to Israel attacks - The Hill - October 17th, 2023 [October 17th, 2023]
- AOC and two fellow NY progressives back formal plea for ceasefire ... - New York Daily News - October 17th, 2023 [October 17th, 2023]
- Poland's voters turn fear into a stunning win for progressives - Tortoise - Tortoise Media - October 17th, 2023 [October 17th, 2023]
- Some progressives split with Biden and the Democrats on ... - The Boston Globe - October 17th, 2023 [October 17th, 2023]
- COLUMN: Schools, progressives must realize kids belong to parents - Oil City Derrick - October 17th, 2023 [October 17th, 2023]
- Scott hits Biden, progressives over response to Hamas attacks in Israel - The Hill - October 17th, 2023 [October 17th, 2023]
- Bergus: A model white progressive for Black justice in Iowa City - The Gazette - October 17th, 2023 [October 17th, 2023]
- Capitol Police Brief Progressives On Security Measures Amid Rise ... - Yahoo News - October 17th, 2023 [October 17th, 2023]
- Why Pittsburgh & Allegheny County progressives keep winning elections - 90.5 WESA - May 20th, 2023 [May 20th, 2023]
- How Progressives Won and Lost in Purple Pennsylvania - The Intercept - May 20th, 2023 [May 20th, 2023]
- Progressives gird for battle as permitting talks escalate - E&E News - May 20th, 2023 [May 20th, 2023]
- Philadelphia mayoral race 2023: What to know about the May 16 Democratic primary - Vox.com - May 20th, 2023 [May 20th, 2023]
- Bidens 14th Amendment message to progressives: It aint gonna happen - Yahoo News - May 20th, 2023 [May 20th, 2023]
- Medicare for All bill revived by House and Senate progressives - Healthcare Finance News - May 20th, 2023 [May 20th, 2023]
- Douglas Rooks: On economic issues, progressives are missing in ... - Kennebec Journal and Morning Sentinel - May 20th, 2023 [May 20th, 2023]
- Maine Media, Progressives Get Migrant Crisis Wrong - The Maine Wire - May 20th, 2023 [May 20th, 2023]
- Chicago Tonight | Spotlight Politics: Progressives Push Tax Increase ... - PBS - May 20th, 2023 [May 20th, 2023]
- Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is a Lying Crank Posing as a Progressive ... - Current Affairs - May 20th, 2023 [May 20th, 2023]
- A Bernie Sanders Progressive Could Be the Next Leader of One of Americas Largest Counties - The Nation - May 20th, 2023 [May 20th, 2023]
- Chicago mayors progressive strategy to be tested amid public safety, growth concerns - NBC News - May 20th, 2023 [May 20th, 2023]
- AOC says lawmakers' relationship with Zients is still a work in progress - POLITICO - May 20th, 2023 [May 20th, 2023]
- 'Red Room of Doom' put brakes on some progressive priorities in ... - The Durango Herald - May 20th, 2023 [May 20th, 2023]
- San Fran progressives BAN lesbian Asian from setting up Dem club because title had 'family' in it - Daily Mail - May 8th, 2023 [May 8th, 2023]
- Brandon Johnsons early appointments suggest hell be a pragmatic ... - Chicago Sun-Times - May 8th, 2023 [May 8th, 2023]
- Opinion | Why Warren Buffett Runs Berkshire Hathaway His Way - The New York Times - May 8th, 2023 [May 8th, 2023]
- The Right's Economic Populism Is Breaking Progressives' Brains - POLITICO - May 6th, 2023 [May 6th, 2023]
- Progressives are winning the immigration debate but it doesn't feel like it - Financial Times - May 6th, 2023 [May 6th, 2023]
- 'Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 3' And The MCU's Tradition of Villainous Progressives - Observer - May 6th, 2023 [May 6th, 2023]
- Jordan Neely matters but where were progressives when 27 others were killed on the subway? - New York Post - May 6th, 2023 [May 6th, 2023]
- San Antonio, El Paso voting on progressive propositions - The Texas Tribune - May 6th, 2023 [May 6th, 2023]
- Progressives Are Declaring War on Basic Economics: News: The ... - The Beacon - May 6th, 2023 [May 6th, 2023]
- Opinion: The Hypocrisy Of Maharashtra's Progressives - NDTV - May 6th, 2023 [May 6th, 2023]
- Progressive Falls Short of Goal in Q1 - Insurance Journal - May 6th, 2023 [May 6th, 2023]