Media Search:



Amazon’s porn censorship is inconsistent and unfair

Thanks to the Internet, we now have access to more (and filthier) porn than any generation in history. And that porn is available in more places than you might imagine not least through the worlds largest online retailer. As Jeremy Wilsonpointed out in a recent article at the Kernel, Amazon sells material through its website that appears perilously close to glorifying incest and child rape. One particularly hideous title includes a mother being raped by her daughter; subsequently, the daughters syphilitic associate also rapes the mother, after which they sew her vagina shut. Another title features graphic descriptions of bestiality and underage sex, and includes a description of an actual rape presented as a fantasy for titillation.

Wilsons article focuses on self-published pornographic ebooks available through Amazon. It is but one of a number ofarticlesover the last few weeks that have expressed shock and revulsion at the vile trade in online rape porn, as a typically reserved Daily Mailheadline put its. Online retailers have responded with panic at the negative publicity. Amazon has engaged in widespread deletion of self-published books which, full disclosure, affects me directly, since Ive penned someebook naughtinessmyself. According to bestselling erotica writer Selena Kitt, her book Babysitting the Baumgartners, which Idiscussed on Salon, wasdeleteduntil she changed the title to Sitting the Baumgartners. WHSmith in Britain actuallytook its websiteoffline while it removed not just all erotic self-published titles, but all self-published titles, period. Kobo is also making sweeping deletions.

Interestingly, though, the titles I discussed in my first paragraph do not face either deletion or censorship. Thats because theyre not self-published. The daughter-mother rape is one of the most infamous scenes from the work of theMarquis de Sade. The other title, with the bestiality and underage sex, is Nancy Fridays My Secret Garden.

I asked Jeremy Wilson by email whether, given his feelings about self-published erotic ebooks, he also opposes Amazon selling work by de Sade and Friday. He responded that he had no problem with erotic material being sold on Amazon and I have no problem with books containing challenging and disturbing themes being sold. He added that, Im not interested in censorship or the state regulating works of fiction, but I would question the morality of anyone willing to profit from fetishized rape porn.

That seems reasonable, and certainly the ebook he mentioned in his email, whose title references both abduction and incest,doesnt sound like its likely to have much in the way of redeeming value. But the fact remains that if you are concerned about fetishized rape porn, its not clear why you would focus on some unknown ebook tucked away on Amazon rather than on the king of fetishized rape porn himself. If you think Amazon should not profit from the sale of sexual sadism, why is it okay for them to profit from the sale of de Sade? Or, as New York Times best-selling authorAphrodite Hunttold me after Amazon deleted all her books with the word Virgin in the title, They remove independent books, and yet those from big publishing houses are left intact. If you want to go after virgins, by all means, remove The Virgin Suicides too. Remove Fifty Shades. Why go after the little guy? Because we dont fight back?

Given the double standard, it does seem like self-publishers are singled out less because they have objectionable content (since the content is in fact available in non-self-published books) than because they have less institutional strength and less cultural respectability. There areserious booksabout de Sade andSacher-Masoch. Their work is published by established presses, and they are seen as scholarly and highbrow. In contrast, self-published ebooks are just crap rather like the lowbrow horror and superhero comics that Fredric Wertham pilloried in his infamous 1954 monograph Seduction of the Innocent.

Werthams book eventually resulted inself-regulationby the comics industry and several decades of enforced banality. One rule of the Comics Code stated that in every instance good shall triumph over evil. Another banned the use of the word horror in comics titles.

The reason Werthams criticisms were able to gain traction was in large part because comics were seen as being for kids. Erotic ebooks are not for kids, of course. But they are primarily aimed at another often infantilized group whose aesthetic choices arent taken seriously that is, women. Women are the main writers and consumers of erotic ebooks; Selena Kitt estimated that her readership is 80% female. As variouscommentershave noted, the Daily Mail is fine with publishing photos of scantily-clad women for their male readers. For that matter, Jeremy Wilson hasdefendedrevenge porn, in which men post real nude pictures of real women without the consent of those women in a deliberate effort toharass and intimidate them. Wilson in particular is arguing against state regulation, but he doesnt express any horror at the porn itself, as he does when writing about the ebooks, or suggest that people running those websites should be ashamed. Men terrorizing real women through for-profit websites is okay; women printing fantasies through for-profit websites incites moral panic.

Whats especially frustrating is that the things that make self-published ebooks so easy to attack are also the things that make them valuable. The fact that ebooks arent vetted in the usual sense results in a good number of grammar and spelling errors, but it also means that they can approach different kinds of content in different ways. It seems unlikely, for example, that Venus Santiagoscheerful lactation porn about the anxieties of working womenwould have found atraditional publisher. Qiana Whitted, an associate professor of English at the University of South Carolina and an avid erotic ebook reader, made a similar point in an email to me:

I think about an author likeTheodora Taylorwho self-publishes her interracial romance in what she calls the 50 Loving States series.along with enjoying her stories, I also appreciate the nods to the U.S. Supreme Court case on interracial marriage (Loving v. Virginia) and black playwright August Wilsons Century Cycle. So theres a somewhat specialized interest in Taylors books as well as the familiar characters of erotica fiction with assertive heroines. Could a series like this exist if it were not for digital self publishing?

View original post here:
Amazon’s porn censorship is inconsistent and unfair

Facebook censorship of Kurdish political party

Social media giant Facebook has waded into one of Europe longest-running conflicts after it banned pages belonging to Turkey's largest pro-Kurdish political party.

The main page of the Peace and Democracy Party (BDP) came down on Tuesday, October 29, following several warnings about posting content related to a Kurdish militia fighting in northern Syria and an interview with one of its deputies in which she spoke out for political autonomy of Kurdistan.

Facebook policy on censorship and the recognition of the Kurdish identity proved to be worse than that of Turkey, the party said in a statement.

Long running conflict

Turkey has been in conflict with the armed Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK) which began a war of insurrection in the 1980s seeking independence for swathes of Turkey's southeast, home to the majority of Turkey's estimated 14 million ethnic Kurds. That demand has since been downgraded to political autonomy for minorities. Still, the PKK is listed as a terrorist organization by the European Union, United States and Turkey.

The PKK declared a ceasefire in May as the Turkish government promised democratic reforms to recognize minority rights. Negotiations between the Turkish state and the PKK's jailed leader, Abdullah calan, are ongoing.

Facebook denies that the page came down over the use of Kurdistan -- a term that denotes a Kurdish homeland that encompasses territory in Turkey, Iraq, Iran and Syria.

Its statement from Facebook's European office to Deutsche Welle reads in full:

The BDP page was not removed for mentioning the word 'Kurdistan'. It is true that several BDP pages have been taken down from Facebook. This is because these pages have repeatedly breached Facebook's rules. These rules allow users of Facebook to post political content, including controversial views, but prohibit the posting of content that shows support for internationally-recognised illegal terrorist organisations [including the PKK].

BDP spokesman Cem Bico says the main page came down following the group posting of an interview with BDP's MP Sebahat Tuncel calling for political autonomy for Kurdistan. There is no mention of armed groups.

Read this article:
Facebook censorship of Kurdish political party

Censorship in China: A game of cat of mouse

While the freight train of Chinese development powers into the 21st century, complex social, political and economic forces are shaping a new China - one that President Xi Jinping hoped would be the foundation for a "Chinese Dream" when he made his inaugural speech as president in March 2013.

But while Xi and the Communist Party may speak from the highest platform, they are increasingly obliged to listen to a different national conversation - one that takes place on Sina Weibo, China's Twitter-like microblogging service, which doubles as one of the world's biggest rumour mill.

The government has now realised, especially with the emergence of social media, that media is just a battleground that they cannot afford to lose.

Bingchun Meng,London School of Economics and Political Science

Until recently, Weibo censorship has been a matter of stamping out sensitive terms as and when they emerge. Reports suggest the state may employ as many as two million "public opinion analysts" in this game of semantic "whack-a-mole".

However, since August, China's opinion police have begun to target the "rumour-mongers" themselves. A number of high-profile microbloggers - known in China as "Big V" bloggers - have been arrested and paraded on state TV - "Killing a chicken to scare the monkeys", as the Chinese proverb goes.

China is, in a way, caught between its Maoist past and its capitalist present which one can see in the devotion to industry that stains the skies over its mega-cities and scars the lungs of its people.

And it is there, too, in the media - where Beijing uses soft power to get its story out to the world (in English) - while cracking down hard on citizens who stray from the official version of events.

To discuss China's complex social media equation, we speak with Zhuang Chen, the editor of the BBC Chinese website; Chinese writer and journalist, Lijia Zhang; Xia Yeliang, a professor of economics at Peking University; and Bingchun Meng, a media lecturer at the London School of Economics and Political Science.

Our Newsbytes this week: Egyptian satirist Bassem Youssef is on the airwaves and back in the firing line; Argentine President Cristina Kirchner scores a legal victory against the Clarin media empire; and a crackdown on critical radio in Somalia.

Read the original here:
Censorship in China: A game of cat of mouse

Social Media Costs — and Some Workers Are Paying With Their Jobs

After 12 years on the job, DeMetra "Meech" Christopher says she was fired from Xerox's call center in Lexington, Ky., for posting a picture of herself at work on Instagram and hashtagging the company name.

Christopher says that other employees have posted pictures on Instagram, but management decided to fire her for identifying Xerox. Christopher says she has enlisted a privacy lawyer.

Xerox declined to comment specifically about the case or even confirm Christopher ever worked for the company., but it did provide CIO.com with a copy of its social networking policy for employees who have social media responsibilities as part of their jobs. Xerox does have a strict policy concerning tech devices in the call center. Given the sensitive nature of data, including credit card numbers, the company says it does not allow personal phones, tablets (even paper ones) and cameras in the workplace.

The conflict between Christopher and Xerox underscores a much wider problem. An employee's personal use of social networks and a company's desire to protect its public image have created a dangerous new intersection that threatens to derail any goodwill built up over the years between employee and management. Employees tend to take the brunt of collisions, as Christopher recently found out.

The number of those crashes is growing. CNN put together a list of 10 people who learned social media can get you fired. Among them are these four examples:

Barista Matt Watson anonymously blogged about dealing with difficult customers, was outed by sprudge.com and fired for writing about his place of employment during work hours.

Tenth-grade math teacher Carly McKinney posted racy photos and tweets about marijuana. She was ultimately fired.

California Pizza Kitchen server Timothy DeLaGhetto claims he was fired for tweeting about the company's "lamest ever" new uniforms.

Perhaps most pertinent to CIO.com readers, two male software developers at a PyCon conference joked about "big dongles" and "forking" -- sexual innuendos with a tech twist -- overheard by SendGrid tech developer Adria Richards. She was offended, took a picture of them and tweeted it. One of the men was fired. Hackers exposed Richards' private information before she was fired for "publicly shaming the offenders," SendGrid CEO Jim Franklin wrote in a blog post.

It's not just the working-class portion of the organizational chart, either. CTO Pax Dickinson at Business Insider was fired in September for making racial slurs and rape jokes on Twitter. Also, CFO Gene Morphis at publicly traded fashion retailer Francesca's Holdings Corp. lost his job last year for casually tweeting about company information.

Read the rest here:
Social Media Costs -- and Some Workers Are Paying With Their Jobs

Flip HTML5 Ebook Publisher App Introduced by FlipHTML5.com

(PRWEB) November 03, 2013

Recently FlipHTML5.com, a company offering e-book maker software programs, has introduced its free ebook publisher software which can not only create e-books but can also publish them across multi platforms easily and instantly. This software is one of the Top 5 Awesome Flipbook Software Programs for eBook publishing softwares.

The software can convert PDF files into attractive flip books in no time. And this is not all, this HTML5 PDF to flipbook can also convert MS Office documents and OpenOffice files to e-books too. With a range of customization options, this app is packed with ready-made and ready to use templates, backgrounds and themes. Users can add their own images and videos too and customize the files to suit their requirements. Its usability saves a lot of time and creates e-books instantly. George Mansion, a satisfied customer writes, Flip HTML5 solution is more than I expected. For business I need to do a lot of presentations to my customers and am always hoping to find a way to better present than the PDF, this software does it for me, thanks a lot.

The basic version is offered at no cost to customers worldwide. The software offers professional features which help create attractive e-books, magazines and brochures.

FlipHTML5.com is an online company offering digital media publishing software programs. It is known for its high quality products supplied at no cost.

Go here to read the rest:
Flip HTML5 Ebook Publisher App Introduced by FlipHTML5.com