Media Search:



Best Themes Preview White Family Psychologist Joomla Template by Delta Joomla Download – Video


Best Themes Preview White Family Psychologist Joomla Template by Delta Joomla Download
Grab 100 Great Products With Master Resale Rights! Make Money Now! http://tiny.cc/CRAZY-Money # If you #39;ve ever used WordPress, then you most likely have swit...

By: best channel

Read more from the original source:
Best Themes Preview White Family Psychologist Joomla Template by Delta Joomla Download - Video

Best Themes Preview White Education Joomla Theme by Sawyer TMT Joomla Template Download – Video


Best Themes Preview White Education Joomla Theme by Sawyer TMT Joomla Template Download
Grab 100 Great Products With Master Resale Rights! Make Money Now! http://tiny.cc/CRAZY-Money # If you #39;ve ever used WordPress, then you most likely have swit...

By: best channel

More:
Best Themes Preview White Education Joomla Theme by Sawyer TMT Joomla Template Download - Video

We retort, we decide: This is the real mainstream press bias

Last week a Washington anecdote offered a glimpse into the mental state of the Washington press corps, as White House press secretary Jay Carney faced a reportorial rebellion around an unexpected issue: metaphors.

It was a Rashomon-like incident, in which reporters either presumptuously chided a government official for his phraseology or they resolutely refused to accept evasion when the public deserved answers. But which was it?

Scott Wilson of the Washington Post reported on the insurrection over Carneys use of language. Carney had described the GOPs actions around the government shutdown and the debt ceiling debate with words like matches and gasoline and nuclear weapon (a weapon that Republicans were allegedly keeping in a back pocket).

But the term that finally provoked an outburst was ransom, a word the administration has deployed many times in recent days. When Carney began a comment by saying The president will not pay ransom for he was interrupted by Ari Shapiro from NPR, who told Carney that the word ransom was a metaphor which doesnt serve our purposes.

It sounds like a highhanded comment, but maybe you had to be there. Shapiro obviously was, and he said this in an email exchange with Salon: I might have used a different phrase than suit our purposes if Id scripted it in advance, but I was speaking off the cuff Carney wasnt helping us understand the White Houses actual position on whether a six-month debt ceiling bill would be enough to bring the president to the table.

Shapiro certainly wasnt alone in his discontent. The Post reported that he shouted back at Carney with broad support from other journalists.

You guys are just too literal then, right? Carney replied. As the press room exploded in hubbub, Carney muttered phrases as if to himself: the closing of the American mind the failure to appreciate metaphor and simile .

The moment brought to mind the Surrealists of the 1920s or the Situationists of the 1960s: a revolt over style, the White House press corps as vanguard for a revolution in language, thought and perception. Shapiro quickly killed that speculation with his retort: We just want to accurately report, he told Carney. Were trying to be accurate in our description of whats going on.

Its easy to sympathize. The president, a self-described Rorschach test, can be evasive. He often does it gracefully, like one of those post-Newtonian physical phenomena that are both particle and wave at the same time. His officials, on the other hand, have proven less adept in practicing the art of evasion. Anyone whos been on the receiving end of this practice knows it can be a maddening experience.

Thats a minor aggravation that only affects a few people. Whats more important is the question that went unanswered. As Shapiro put it in a blog post, Carney explained that Obama will have conversations but wont pay a ransom (but) one mans negotiation is another mans conversation is another mans ransom.

Visit link:
We retort, we decide: This is the real mainstream press bias

Press hails 'magnificent' night, but play down World Cup hopes

Home Mail News Sports Finance Weather Games Groups Answers Screen Flickr More omg! Shine Movies Music TV Health Shopping Travel Autos Homes Mobile Yahoo News Search News Search Web Sign In Mail Help Account Info Help Suggestions Yahoo News Home Video Photos GMA Year in Review Odd Comics Travel Opinion Trending Now Who Knew? Weather The Upbeat U.S. U.S. Video GMA Education Religion Crimes and Trials Local Contributor Network Year In Review World World Video Middle East Europe Latin America Africa Asia Canada Australia/Antarctica Business Video Exclusives Today's Markets Stocks Personal Finance Marketplace Entertainment Video Clinton Concert Celebrity TV Movies Music Fashion Books Arts Theater Dear Abby Comics Odd News Sports Video NFL MLB NBA NCAAF NCAAB Soccer Cycling NHL Tennis Golf Boxing Motor Sports MMA Olympics Tech Gadgets Wireless Apple Social Media Security Open Source Gaming Apps This Could Be Big Upgrade Your Life Politics Remake America The Issues Women and Politics Press Releases Video Science Science Video Weather News Space / Astronomy Pets Dinosaurs / Fossils Biotech Energy Green Health Video Weight Loss Cancer Sexual Health Medications/Drugs Parenting/Kids Seniors/Aging Diseases/Conditions Blogs The Sideshow Katie's Take Power Players This Could Be Big Newsmakers Trending Now The Upbeat Who Knew? Nightline Fix Beyond the Headline Local Popular Search Keyword News Search

Read the original here:
Press hails 'magnificent' night, but play down World Cup hopes

Ann Coulter Talks to Mediaite About Issuing a ‘Fatwa’ for Conservatives, and Why She Mostly Watches MSNBC

Ann Coulter is back with her latest book, Never Trust a Liberal Over Three Especially a Republican , and this time shes taking aim not just at the usual suspects on the left, but also the Republican Party and the forces within that have consistently lost many recent elections. Unlike previous Coulter works, the book concedes that Democrats do something better than their GOP counterpart: They know how to win elections, she writes. In a recent interview, Coulter talked to Mediaite about the book, her outlook for the GOP, and why she actually watches MSNBC more than any other cable news outlet. Read below, in two pages:

This book seems to take a more defeatist tone than your others. At one point, you write: Even when we win, we cant win. Have you given up?

I speak for a lot of Americans when I say that. After Nov. 6, 2012, I was out. I was done with politics. I was actually considering starting to write columns on Gossip Girls, Revenge, the cultural stuff I enjoy. But then I got reinvigorated by the gun debate. And so I tried to lure people back into conservative politics by writing a fun book.

Your basic case seems to be that Republicans need to learn how to win elections

Im like the conservative ayatollah. Okay, Im issuing a fatwa: We have to win elections! After Mitt Romneys loss, it was a natural human tendency to lurch towards a silver-bullet solution. Some people blamed the tea party, others blamed the establishment. In some cases, sure, but the main thing is that with the right, its about self-expression. For example: In 2008, I supported Rep. Duncan Hunter during the GOP primaries. It was stupid of me to support him, even though hes good on every single issue. Why? Because my next door neighbor is good on every issue. But we need someone who can win. We need to see how sneaky, manipulative, and single-minded Dems are about winning elections.

You write a lot about how the Democrats are better at winning elections

When it comes to electoral politics, the Democrats operate on brains. They win elections by looking at electorate and modeling their races; Republicans win on national waves. The GOP does nothing and just happens to get elected when Americans are frustrated.

Im proud of Republicans for being the party of ideas. But when it comes to elections, we lose that. For instance, right now conservatives are tearing down [Senate Minority Leader] Mitch McConnell. But what did he do?! By attempting to primary him, theyre just mirroring their concern about getting back respectable Republicans. I dont even know who the establishment candidate that Mitch was pushing that pissed everyone off. Did he run any differently than Rand Paul? No. Mitch didnt support the amnesty plan. Rand was supporting that for a month. Its this image thing that We are the purists, were against the establishment. But thats how liberals are.

And think about this: In the last GOP primary, Romney was the only candidate other than Michele Bachmann who absolutely opposed amnesty. So whose side were the ones calling him a RINO on then? Huh? The average American hates amnesty; and who sold them out? Not Romney, but Marco Rubio.

We have to get away from shibboleths and focus on races.

Read this article:

Ann Coulter Talks to Mediaite About Issuing a ‘Fatwa’ for Conservatives, and Why She Mostly Watches MSNBC