Mediaboss Marketing

New Delhi: Delhi Police on Friday asked social networking websites to delete intimate photographs of TV anchor Amrita Rai with Congress leader Digvijaya Singh, a day after she filed a complaint saying her email and social accounts were hacked.

Rai had complained that her accounts on Gmail, Facebook and Twitter were hacked, following which the police crime branch registered a case under the IT Act.

"We have forwarded her request to delete her objectionable photographs to social networking websites," a police officer told IANS.

Twitter Wednesday was abuzz with news of the revelation of the affair between 67-year-old Digvijaya Singh, a former chief minister of Madhya Pradesh, and Rai, a Rajya Sabha TV anchor.

Both accepted that they were in a relationship and will marry soon. Digvijaya Singh posted two tweets, acknowledging the relationship with Rai.

Original post:
Police ask social media to delete TV anchor's photos

Digvijaya Singh (L) and Amrita Rai

The step was taken a day after police registered an FIR following a complaint filed by Ms Rai alleging that her email accounts were hacked and pictures were made public with an intention to outrage her modesty.

The Crime Branch of Delhi Police has registered a case in this regard under section 66A of the IT Act and section 509 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) (word, gesture or act intended to insult the modesty of a woman) following the complaint.

In her complaint, Ms Rai had also alleged that her fake Facebook and Twitter accounts were set up and submitted a list of such fraudulent accounts through which those pictures were circulated.

"We have forwarded her request to take down all objectionable photographs from social networking sites," a senior police official said.

A controversy had erupted after private pictures of Ms Rai and Mr Singh surfaced on social media following which the 67-year-old politician admitted to his relationship with her on Twitter on Wednesday.

"I have no hesitation in accepting my relationship with Amrita Rai. She and her husband have already filed a mutual consent divorce case. Once that is decided we would formalize it," the former Chief Minister of Madhya Pradesh tweeted.

"But I do condemn encroachment in our private life," Mr Singh said.

Mr Singh's wife Asha passed away last year after prolonged illness. He has four daughters and a son from the marriage. Ms Rai, said to be in her early 40s, had also tweeted that she will marry Mr Singh after the divorce with her husband.

"I have separated from my husband and we have filed for a mutual consent divorce. After which I have decided to marry with Digvijaya Singh," she tweeted.

See the article here:
Police Asks Websites to Remove Private Photographs of Amrita Rai and Digvijaya Singh

Delhi Police today asked social networking sites to delete the private pictures of journalist Amrita Rai with Congress leader Digvijay Singh which were made public after her email accounts were allegedly hacked.

The step was taken a day after police registered an FIR following a complaint filed by Rai alleging that her email accounts were hacked and pictures were made public with an intention to outrage her modesty.

The Crime Branch of Delhi Police has registered a case in this regard under section 66A of IT Act and section 509 IPC (word, gesture or act intended to insult the modesty of a woman) following the complaint.

In her complaint, Rai had also alleged that her fake Facebook and Twitter accounts were set up and submitted a list of such fraudulent accounts through which those pictures were circulated.

"We have forwarded her request to take down all objectionable photographs from social networking sites," a senior police official said.

A controversy had erupted after private pictures of Rai and Singh surfaced on social media following which the 67-year-old politician admitted to his relationship with her on Twitter on Wednesday.

"I have no hesitation in accepting my relationship with Amrita Rai. She and her husband have already filed a mutual consent divorce case...Once that is decided we would formalize it," the former Chief Minister of Madhya Pradesh tweeted.

"But I do condemn encroachment in our private life," Singh said.

Singh's wife Asha passed away last year after prolonged illness. He has four daughters and a son from the marriage.

Rai, said to be in her early 40s, had also tweeted that she will marry Singh after divorce with her husband.

Read more here:
Police Ask Websites to Remove Private Pics of Rai, Digvijay

Delhi Police on asked social networking sites to delete the private pictures of journalist Amrita Rai with Congress leader Digvijaya Singh which were made public after her email accounts were allegedly hacked.

The step was taken a day after police registered an FIR following a complaint filed by Rai alleging that her email accounts were hacked and pictures were made public with an intention to outrage her modesty.

The Crime Branch of Delhi Police has registered a case in this regard under section 66A of IT Act and section 509 IPC (word, gesture or act intended to insult the modesty of a woman) following the complaint.

In her complaint, Rai had also alleged that her fake Facebook and Twitter accounts were set up and submitted a list of such fraudulent accounts through which those pictures were circulated.

"We have forwarded her request to take down all objectionable photographs from social networking sites," a senior police official said.

A controversy had erupted after private pictures of Rai and Singh surfaced on social media following which the 67-year-old politician admitted to his relationship with her on Twitter on Wednesday.

"I have no hesitation in accepting my relationship with Amrita Rai. She and her husband have already filed a mutual consent divorce case...Once that is decided we would formalise it," the former chief minister of Madhya Pradesh tweeted.

"But I do condemn encroachment in our private life," Singh said.

Singh's wife Asha passed away last year after prolonged illness. He has four daughters and a son from the marriage.

Rai, said to be in her early 40s, had also tweeted that she will marry Singh after divorce with her husband.

Read the rest here:
Police ask websites to remove private pics of Rai, Digvijaya

Larry Downing/Reuters

When asked about polarization between justices, Ginsburg said that liberals who criticize the conservative Scalia forget that he "is one of the most pro-Fourth Amendment judges on the court." The Fourth Amendment protects U.S. citizens from unreasonable searches and seizures. Here is an excerpt from that interview:

WSJ: How deeply polarized is the court?

GINSBURG: [Justice Antonin] Scalia is often criticized by people who would not be labeled conservative. Liberals dont count his Fourth Amendment cases or the confrontation clause cases. He is one of the most pro-Fourth Amendment judges on the court.

WSJ: Not more pro-Fourth Amendment than you.

GINSBURG: No. But weve been together in all the confrontation cases and many of the Fourth Amendment cases. For example, that wonderful, wonderful one with the GPS, and the dog sniff cases.

The "GPS case" was United States v. Jones, in which both justices sided with the courts 2012 ruling that police violated the Fourth Amendment when they attached a GPS device to track a vehicle. In the Florida v. Jardines case, Ginsburg and Scalia both sided with the courts 2013 ruling that police officers use of a drug-sniffing dog at a persons front porch constituted a search under the Fourth Amendment.

In both of those cases, it was Scalia who delivered the Supreme Courts opinion.

There are other recent examples where Scalia has demonstrated pro-Fourth Amendment opinions, as the Los Angeles Times has reported. That includes Scalias opposition to the Supreme Courts majority opinion that permits police to use anonymous tips to stop cars on highways. And in 2013, he fiercely dissented to the Courts ruling that police can routinely swab for DNA from arrested people.

Recently, the Supreme Court has considered whether police can search the digital contents of cellphones without warrants. In reporting on this case, a number of news outlets noted that Scalia has become a champion of the Fourth Amendment.

Here is the original post:
Liberal Supreme Court Justice Comes To The Defense Of Scalia