Media Search:



10 reasons Americans should be wary of Rand Pauls libertarianism especially millennials

Republican Senator Rand Paul has been making a big play for millennials lately, most notably by taking his civil liberties pitch to colleges around the country. Paul has got the right idea when he says his party must evolve, adapt or die (although I think the first two are virtually the same thing).Katie Glueckof Politico wrote that The Kentucky senator drew a largely friendly reception at the University of California-Berkeley as he skewered the intelligence community.

Sen. Paul spoke of dystopian nightmares and added that your rights, especially your right to privacy, are under assault. Paulalso saidhe perceives fear of an intelligence community thats drunk with power, unrepentant and uninclined to relinquish power.

Virtually all of the other politicians taking that stand come from the left side of the political spectrum. They include figures like independent socialist Sen. Bernie Sanders and Democratic senators Ron Wyden and Mark Udall. Rand Paul is not like these other defenders of civil liberties.

Rand Paul, like his father, prefers to package his fairly old-school brand of economic conservatism under the trendier name of libertarianism. Thats not just a labeling change. It also means Paul has paired his retrograde economic ideas with a very outspoken stance against militarism and the espionage state. Its a mixture that Paul hopes can make inroads with groups that are not traditionally Republican voters.

Pauls play for millennials was almost inevitable. As a recent Pew studyreported, that generations disaffection with the two-party system appears to be at record levels. Fifty percent of millennials polled said that they do not associate themselves with either party, which is the highest percentage recorded thus far. Its also a 10 point jump from their equivalent age groups level of political affiliation only seven years ago.

But Rand Paul gravely misunderstands the nature of that political disaffection. Yes, millennials feel alienated toward political and other institutions. They have a right to feel that way. AsJoshua Hollandsays, millennials didnt abandon these institutions. The institutions abandoned them.

But Rand Paul and libertarianism are not the answer. His economic strategy can be summed up in a quota used for one of his bills: remove the shackles of big government byreducing taxes, regulations, and burdensome union work requirements.

In other words, more of the same conservative philosophy that got us in this mess in the first place. Here are 10 reasons why millennials should be extremely wary of the senator from Kentucky.

1. His philosophy of deregulation created your jobs problem.

Rand Paul loved to preach the gospel of deregulation. He went so far as to proclaim that Obama was putting his boot heel on the neck ofget thisBritish Petroleum. Why? Because BP was being asked to bear part of the cost for the oil spill it created.

More here:

10 reasons Americans should be wary of Rand Pauls libertarianism especially millennials

Sean Haugh Libertarian for US Senate 2014 – Consent of the Governed – Video


Sean Haugh Libertarian for US Senate 2014 - Consent of the Governed
Do you want to stop all war and stop piling up debt? Then stop voting for politicians who keep giving us more war and more debt! If you keep voting for Democ...

By: Sean Haugh

Go here to see the original:

Sean Haugh Libertarian for US Senate 2014 - Consent of the Governed - Video

Chris Hayes and Michael Mann discuss Libertarian and conservative climate denial trools – Video


Chris Hayes and Michael Mann discuss Libertarian and conservative climate denial trools
Chris Hayes and Michael Mann discuss Libertarian and conservative crackpots of the "nether region" who flood comment sections with gibberish. Of course, when...

By: antilibertarian

Read the rest here:

Chris Hayes and Michael Mann discuss Libertarian and conservative climate denial trools - Video

Our Political System Is Rigged – 2 of 2 (The Propaganda Model) – Video


Our Political System Is Rigged - 2 of 2 (The Propaganda Model)
Not only are the public too poor to control the state, but the mass media are structured in such a way that is supposed to prevent them from doing so. This i...

By: Libertarian Socialist Rants

See the original post here:

Our Political System Is Rigged - 2 of 2 (The Propaganda Model) - Video

Federal court might be next for Libertarians wanting on ballot

The Daily Briefing Buckeye Forum Podcast

The Dispatchpublic affairs team talks politics and tackles state and federal government issues in the Buckeye Forum podcast.

A federal appeals court likely represents the last chance for Libertarian candidates for governor and attorney general to appear on the statewide ballot.

The Ohio Supreme Court yesterday unanimously upheld a ruling by Secretary of State Jon Husted denying Steven Linnabary the chance to run for attorney general.

Linnabarys election petitions and those from the Libertarian Partys gubernatorial slate were disqualified by Husted because paid circulators who gathered voter signatures failed to disclose their employer on the petitions.

The justices ruled that Husteds interpretation of state law was reasonable in rejecting Linnabarys argument that one of his circulators was an independent contractor, rather than an employee, and not required to list an employer.

The court also found no substance to other issues raised by Linnabary, a Columbus resident, including claims that the First Amendment free-speech and due-process rights were violated.

We are disappointed. This is the first time that qualified candidates were cut off at the threshold because their circulators did not disclose their employment. This deprives Ohio voters of choice, and this is neither right nor fair, said Mark G. Kafantaris, a Columbus lawyer representing Linnabary.

Charlie Earl, the Libertarian candidate for governor, and Linnabary are asking the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to overturn a decision by a federal court judge denying them a spot on the ballot.

U.S. District Judge Michael H. Watson of Columbus ruled against the would-be candidates, ruling that Ohios petition-circulation law places only a minimal burden on free speech.

Read more from the original source:

Federal court might be next for Libertarians wanting on ballot