Media Search:



Do We Want To See Beheading Videos Banned?

She said she came from another country where she had her own culture and own religion, but because of America's First Amendment, she could practice her religion here freely.

This was the sentiment expressed by a student in my First Amendment-related course, The Media: Freedom and Power.

For nearly the past two decades, the first oral presentation assignment has been for students to recite the First Amendment and briefly describe what it means to them. But for some reason her words particularly resonated amid the tremors of the Islamic group ISIS in the Middle East.

ISIS. This one name we had not heard of a year ago now conjures images of unmerciful, cruel brutality. Clad in black, they resemble Nazis rolling their way through Europe in World War II, except ISIS is rolling through Iraq delivering on its promise of death to those who don't renounce their religions and convert to theirs.

Seriously? Who does that in this day and age?

The notion of someone being threatened with death for not believing in the religion of another is something just so out of the realm of our reality in America. While we are not a perfect nation, the idea of being killed for one's religious beliefs is not one of our daily worries.

Now, on the 13th anniversary of the Sept. 11 terrorist attack on America, many Americans once again have the threat of a new group on our collective minds. It is brought more to the fore with the beheadings of American journalists Steve Sotloff and James Foley.

Granted, ISIS has been beheading non-Americans for some time as it campaigned through Iraq and Syria. It has also posted videos of mass executions of captured soldiers and civilians. As it happens so often, it is when the victims are like us in this case Americans and for those in journalism, journalists that the brutality takes on a chillier chill of ice that glazes the soul.

I had purposely avoided seeing the videos depicting the beheadings of Sotloff and Foley. When writing this piece, however, I decided to take a look to see just how horrible the act was. But I could not find it. YouTube pulled the actual depictions of the beheadings. I looked for some time and still did not find it.

I suppose I could have kept looking and I might have found it somewhere on the Internet, but it was somewhat of a relief not to have to brace myself for what was done to them.

Read more:
Do We Want To See Beheading Videos Banned?

Shaheen vs. free speech She wants to silence you

Jeanne Shaheen wants you to shut up already. She believes passionately that the First Amendment is too broad. It has to be rewritten to give government the authority to limit the speech of citizens.

Shaheen has promoted this view for years, and on Monday the bill she co-sponsored to amend the Constitution to restrict citizen speech came up for a procedural Senate vote. The American people lose when corporations and special interests can spend limitless dollars trying to sway public opinion and inject themselves in our democratic election process, and we have to take action on the secret money that is growing increasingly prevalent in campaigns, she said

Corporations and special interests, eh? If restricting corporations is the goal, then why does the constitutional amendment that she co-sponsored say, Congress and the States may regulate and set reasonable limits on the raising and spending of money by candidates and others to influence elections?

The phrase candidates and others means you, not corporations and special interests.

The First Amendment states that Congress shall make no law... abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press. Shaheen wants to make a law to do exactly that. But she cannot, because of the First Amendment. So she wants to amend it to give her the power to limit your ability to speak about politics, which means about her. New Hampshire, speak out against this while you still can.

Here is the original post:
Shaheen vs. free speech She wants to silence you

Who Was Vince Foster and Was He Killed? Cover-Up, Hillary Clinton (1997) – Video


Who Was Vince Foster and Was He Killed? Cover-Up, Hillary Clinton (1997)
Vincent Walker "Vince" Foster, Jr. (January 15, 1945 July 20, 1993) was a Deputy White House Counsel during the first few months of President Bill Clinton #39;...

By: The Book Archive

Read the original:
Who Was Vince Foster and Was He Killed? Cover-Up, Hillary Clinton (1997) - Video

Slide 33 Hillary Clinton – first example of giving her conclusion first – Video


Slide 33 Hillary Clinton - first example of giving her conclusion first
http://www.meltonassociates.co.uk / http://www.rogercrisp.com Here Hillary Clinton goes straight for her conclusion. She can then explain the details for as long as she is allowed to. Originally at: https://ww...

By: 5 Steps to dealing effectively with the Media

Continue reading here:
Slide 33 Hillary Clinton - first example of giving her conclusion first - Video

Would Romney be a better president than Hillary Clinton? – Video


Would Romney be a better president than Hillary Clinton?
Reaction to recent remarks.

By: Joseph Teeny

Read this article:
Would Romney be a better president than Hillary Clinton? - Video