Media Search:



Philadelphia, Pa. Social Media Consultants-HyperSonicMarketing-Dominate Local Online Competition – – Video

18-02-2012 17:53 http://www.hypersonicmarketing.net Hypersonic Marketing is a marketing service firm based out side of Philadelphia Pa. Our video describes local internet marketing tips to help your small business succeed in the coming years.http

Follow this link:
Philadelphia, Pa. Social Media Consultants-HyperSonicMarketing-Dominate Local Online Competition - - Video

Social Media Week in Review: What you may have missed

Since it's so hard to keep up with everything that's shared on social media, here's a weekly guide to things that may have passed you by.

OK, here's the dirty little secret of social media. Almost everyone will miss almost everything you share.

Those who disparage Twitter, Facebook, and so on, point to that as a reason for us to ignore social media altogether.

But though it's true most folks will miss the majority of your posts, that's no excuse for you not to participate. After all, you can say that about any medium--TV, magazines, newspapers, even blockbuster films--the majority of people will never see what goes on there.

So, in an attempt to get more stuff seen, I'm starting a Social Media Week In Review. Each weekend, I'll post items you may have missed. You can help by posting links in the comments section or e-mailing me at sreetips@sree.net.

First stop: Mashable's 37 digital-media resources you may have missed, by @MattPetronzio. A great way to catch up with all the best posts within Mashable, a leading social-media site. On Mondays, @Charlie_White offers a Weekend Recap of Mashable posts--also worth checking out.

Social Media Week: Hundreds of social-media events were held in dozens of cities last week as part of Social Media Week. That means you--and I--missed almost everything that went on. Dozens of the panels were simulcast, and you can catch up via the SMW Livestream page. I was involved in two panels, and I thought I'd share them here.

One was about the future of education (video here). It featured several terrific speakers, but the star of the show was Melissa Seideman (@MSeideman), 8th grade history teacher from a school north of NYC. She showed me several new tools that I'll use with my students, including Socrative, an audience/class instant polling service that could make those complicated clicker-based systems obsolete.

The other panel was one I moderated at the instigation of Eric Carvin (@EricCarvin), the new social-media editor at the Associated Press. (Video below.) It was about challenging the conventional wisdom in social media, with seven top social-media editors. Strange to think that such a new medium already has conventional wisdom, but it's true, and we covered many topics I hope to touch on in future posts.

#anthonyshadid: Thursday night we learned that Anthony Shadid, two-time Pulitzer Prize winner, and foreign correspondent for The New York Times (and ex-Washington Post, ex-AP) had died while covering the crisis in Syria. A man who had survived the Iraq war and countless other hostilities, including being kidnapped in Libya, appeared to have died because of an asthma attack. In a testament to how popular he was, Facebook and Twitter lit up with posts, tributes, and comments about his work. This NYT compilation of tweets shows the extent of Shadid's reach; my favorite was by his former colleague Don Van Natta, Jr. (@DVNjr):

"By Anthony Shadid" was a beacon of humanity and truth.
February 17, 2012

Liz Heron (@LHeron), NYT social-media editor, speaking at a tribute to Shadid at Columbia Journalism School, pointed out social media's unusual role in the hours after his death. She said the paper and his family would have had no idea how globally loved Shadid had been if it weren't for the outpouring of affection via social media.

Shadid himself was on Twitter (@AnthonyShadid), and what struck me the most about how he used it was in his very simple Twitter bio. He just said, "Journalist and author," rather than mention his prizes and his Times connection. How many of us are as humble as he was?

Shadid's widow, Nada Bakri (@NadaBakri), a former student at Columbia, tweeted this on Saturday:

#anthonyshadid i love and appreciate all your notes. they bring so much solace. he had so much more to give ... if only he had the time.
February 18, 2012

Funniest post I saw this week: Changing gears, the most amusing item I saw was posted on my Facebook wall by Jonathan Boorstein (@solodiner). It was a graphic from StuffJournalistsLike.com's Facebook account, which looked at what journalists think they do and what they actually do. I guess others liked it, too. The graphic got more than 14,500 likes and almost a thousand comments.

What did I miss? Tell me in the comments or via @sree or #sreetips on Twitter.

Original post:
Social Media Week in Review: What you may have missed

Why social media, mobile phones want your info

SAN FRANCISCO — Living in the world of social networking and mobile smartphones means trading away some of your personal information.

But assessing the price of admission to join the super-networked, digital class is not so simple; even experts on the issue admit that they don't have a full picture of the way personal information is collected and used on the Internet. But here are some basic guidelines to keep in mind.

Q. What information do you have to give up to participate in social media?

A. Social networks such as Facebook and Google+ require at a minimum that you provide them with your name, gender and date of birth. Many people provide additional profile information, and the act of using the services - writing comments or uploading photos or "friending" people - creates additional information about you. Most of that information can be kept hidden from the public if you choose, though the companies themselves have access to it.

If you use your Facebook credentials to log-on to other Web sites, or if you use Facebook apps, you might be granting access to parts of your profile that would otherwise be hidden. Quora, for example, a popular online Q&A site, requires that Facebook users provide it access to their photos, their "Likes" and information that their friends share with them. TripAdvisor, by contrast, requires only access to "basic information" including gender and lists of friends.

Social media apps on smartphones, which have access to personal phone call information and physical location, put even more information at play.

On Apple Inc's iPhone, apps must get user permission to access GPS location coordinates, a procedure that will now be applied to address book access as well after companies including Twitter were found to be downloading iPhone address book information. Beyond those two types of data, Apple locks away personal data stored in other applications, such as notepad and calendar apps, according to Michael Sutton, the vice president of security research at email security service ZScaler.

Google Inc's Android smartphone operating system allows third-party apps to tap into a bonanza of personal data, though only if they get permission. In order to download an app from the Android Market, users must click 'OK' on a pop-up list that catalogues the specific types of information that each particular app has access to.

Related: Data collection arms race feeds privacy fears

With both mobile and Facebook apps, often the choice is to provide access to a personal information or not use the app at all.

Q. Should I worry about how my information is being used? A. Personal information is the basic currency of an Internet economy built around marketing and advertising. Hundreds of companies collect personal information about Web users, slice it up, combine it with other information, and then resell it.

Facebook doesn't provide personal information to outside marketers, but other websites, including sites that access Facebook profile data, may have different policies. Last year, a study by Stanford University graduate student found that profile information on an online dating site, including ethnicity, income and drug use frequency, was somehow being tramsitted to a third-party data firm.

The data that third-parties collect is used mainly by advertisers, but there are concerns that these profiles could be used by insurance companies or banks to help them make decisions about who to do business with. Q. Are there any restrictions on what information companies can collect from Internet users or what they can do with it?

A. In the United States, the federal law requires websites that know they are being visited by children under 13 to post a privacy policy, get parental approval before collecting personal information on children, and allow parents to bar the spread of that information or demand its deletion. The site operators are not allowed to require more information from the children than is "reasonably necessary" for participating in its activities.

Related: 7 signs we're living in the post-privacy era

For those who are 13 or older, the United States has no overarching restrictions. Websites are free to collect personal information including real names and addresses, credit card numbers, Internet addresses, the type of software installed, and even what other websites people have visited. Sites can keep the information indefinitely and share most of what they get with just about anyone.

Websites are not required to have privacy policies. Companies have most often been tripped up by saying things in their privacy policies - such as promising that data is kept secure - and then not living up to them. That can get them in trouble under the federal laws against unfair and deceptive practices.

Sites that accept payment card information have to follow industry standards for encrypting and protecting that data. Medical records and some financial information, such as that compiled by rating agencies, are subject to stricter rules.

European privacy laws are more stringent and the European Union is moving to establish a universal right to have personal data removed from a company's database-informally known as the "right to be forgotten." That approach is fervently opposed by companies dependent on Internet advertising.

Related: Data collection arms race feeds privacy fears

Q. Is there likely to be new privacy legislation in the United States?

A. The year 2011 saw a flurry of activity on Capitol Hill as U.S. lawmakers introduced a handful of do-not-track bills with even the Obama White House calling for a "privacy bill of rights."

Leading the charge on do-not-track legislation are the unlikely pair of Reps. Edward J. Markey, a Massachussetts Democrat, and Joseph Barton, a Republican from Texas, who have jointly led a "Bipartisan Congressional Privacy Caucus."

Still, with half a dozen privacy laws meandering through Congress, most observers expect it could take a long time before any are passed-and not before they are significantly watered down in the legislative process.

Related:

Related:

Copyright 2012 Thomson Reuters. Click for restrictions.

Here is the original post:
Why social media, mobile phones want your info

Digital Film Switch Could Signal End Of Historic Movie Theaters

BUFFALO, N.Y. — The license plate on movie projectionist Arnie Herdendorf's Buick is 35MM MAN, a nod to his work in the booth at the 1925 Palace Theatre, with its velvet-draped stage and chandeliered mezzanine.

When he drove recently to a multiplex to watch as its film projectors were swapped out for new digital ones, the sight of old 35 mm workhorses "stacked up like wounded soldiers" had him wondering how long his title – or job – would be around.

The questions are even bigger for historic movie houses themselves.

With the future of motion pictures headed quickly toward an all-digital format played only on pricey new equipment, will the theaters be around? Or will they be done in by the digital revolution that will soon render inadequate the projectors that have flickered and ticked with a little-changed technology for more than 120 years?

"Our guess is by the end of 2013 there won't be any film distributed anymore," said John Fithian, president and chief executive of the National Association of Theater Owners.

The Hollywood studios' industry-wide conversion from 35 mm film to digital satisfies modern-day demands for crisp clarity, cost savings and special effects like 3-D. And for big-budget theaters where new releases occupy multiple screens, installing digital projectors is a no-brainer. Already, about 60 percent have converted in the United States, at a price of $70,000 to $80,000 a screen, Fithian said.

But for the community-owned Palace and other small and historic movie houses, the merging of nostalgia with high-tech is a dauntingly expensive proposition. Yet one, most agree, that is critical if they are to keep attracting audiences to their light bulb-studded marquees. The cost is more than double the price of a top-of-the-line film projector.

"The Riviera Theatre is listed on the historic register, but we are not a museum," Executive Director Frank Cannata said from the 1927 theater north of Buffalo, "so it's important that we stay current ... and staying current isn't always affordable, as we're all finding out."

An estimated 500 to 750 historic theaters currently show movies, according to the Theatre Historical Society of America, though it adds no one has formally researched the number and the estimate is conservative.

"This is another major threat to these theaters which were largely rescued and restored by grass-roots local efforts," said Karen Colizzi Noonan, president of the THS, which records and preserves theaters' architectural and cultural history. "It is so sad that after all that hard work and dedication these groups now face another huge challenge just to survive."

And survival means doing whatever they can to raise the cash to convert.

Supporters of the privately owned Davis Theatre in Higginsville, Mo., are vying for a $50,000 prize in a Reader's Digest contest that would help pay for digital equipment for the 500-seat main auditorium. They were in second place at the start of February, with a month of voting to go.

"It's a long haul but it's encouraging to see a town come together," said Fran Schwarzer, who, with her husband, George, was nearing retirement age and sunk their savings into buying the 1934 theater to keep it from closing in 1998.

The couple added three screens in 2005 so they could show more first-run movies, always viewing the venture as more community service than money-maker in the small town east of Kansas City.

"If we had known then what we know now" about the swift onset of digital, "we would never have gone into debt more to put in three more auditoriums," Schwarzer said.

The Riviera will show movies with its two carbon arc lamphouses and projectors for as long as it can, Cannata said, while exploring funding for the digital replacements. If it can't, it will have to do away with the popular second-run movies offered at discount rates.

While live shows and other programming would keep the Riviera going, other theaters are trying to stave off closing with fundraisers, like the taco supper planned to raise money for the Onarga Theater in eastern Illinois. The 1937 theater that boasts being the first south of Chicago to show movies with sound has invested in its seating, concessions and sound systems in recent years, but can't afford the switch to digital projection.

North of Buffalo, the nonprofit, community-owned Palace is looking into loans and grants for a $75,000 digital set up, but it's also going to have to upgrade its electrical system to accommodate the new equipment, said Phil Czarnecki, vice president of the board. He can't help but think of all the restoration of the building – a replica of the Paramount Theater in New York City that mixes Art Deco and Italian Renaissance style – that could be accomplished with such an outlay.

The small theaters already are feeling pressure from the digital conversions taking place all around them. Instead of waiting three weeks for a modern multiplex to make a movie print available, it now often takes six or seven weeks because there are fewer 35 mm copies in circulation. That's more than enough time for the pool of potential ticket-buyers to lose interest or see the movie somewhere else.

It's not just the cost of digital projection that concerns Edward Summer, president of the Buffalo Niagara Film Festival. He worries that once older movie houses make the switch, they'll do away with their 35 mm projectors, something he says would be "a hideous mistake."

Summer sees a potential tourism niche in historic theaters showing classic movies – and he worries that existing films that won't be digitized will be forever lost to audiences if the equipment isn't there to show them.

"Every motion picture made between 1894 and right this minute is on 35 mm film and those films not only still exist, but those film prints are the only way to see them," Summer said.

"It's not either/or," Summer said of the two projection technologies, "it's both/and."

The Palace's Herdendorf doesn't own a computer and isn't sure if his 17 years of splicing and dicing reels of film and threading them through a platter projection system will translate to the new technology with its pocket-size hard drives. He knows what to do if film breaks, but not if a computer freezes.

The Riviera eventually plans to display one of its 35 mm carbon arc projectors in the lobby, Cannata said, "so people can take a look at how films were shown at one time."

The Davis Theatre's Schwarzer jokes that her place's four projectors will become boat anchors. What's important, she said, is that the theater's doors stay open.

"We have such wonderful memories of this theater as children," she said. "You kind of like to think that kids that come now will have some of those memories, too."

Read more:
Digital Film Switch Could Signal End Of Historic Movie Theaters

Williams in a breeze over Ishida – Cloud nips Campillo via split verdict… by George Elsasser

Williams in a breeze over Ishida - Cloud nips Campillo via split verdict... by George Elsasser
 

Showtime Saturday night twin-bill delivered the goods with mixed bag of busy ring action that had a bit of everything for the enthusiastic fans in attendance - show opens with l/heavyweight action - hard punching undefeated IBF champion Tavoris Cloud in with veteran Gabriele Campillo that would leave little to the imagination over twelve busy stanzas.

Cloud was the quicker out of the gate bringing it to a cautious Campillo - then bingo when late in the stanza a Cloud straight right hand found the mark and Campillo is down - beats the count but looks shaky that has the one called "Thunder" is all over him with a barrage and the game Spaniard falls against the ring strands - third hack in charge Mark Nelson directs Cloud to neutral corner and gives it a standing eight count.

On that note the opening three minutes go into the books as a Cloud 10-7 point advantage - it also takes on the appearance of a quickie for the defending champion.

But not to be, as Campillo surprises the entire joint including Cloud, with an assorted variety of solid punches from both sides of the plate - jabs, hooks and inside uppercuts that has "Thunder" assuming a defensive stance.

The one called "Chico Guapo" would have a big candle three before Cloud would regroup with strong finish to grab numero cuatro - but is also seen bleeding from cut over the left eye.

The entertaining battle for the IBF bauble continued to the final bell with most rounds a coin flip that would be scored in a beauty in the eyes of the beholder that would go in favor of the defending champion to the tune of Cloud 116-110,114-112; Campillo 114-112.

My unofficial saw it Campillo 114-112 in points and 8-4 under the more reliable round by round method.

Post Scripts: Cloud (24-0, 19 KOs) ~ age 30 (5'10") -- No surprise here the "Thunder" sobriquet fits to the letter - mega-power in both mittens. Would like to see him work in style ala Joe Frazier with the bob-and- weave from a crouch. Still, my dime goes with him in return. Gave credit to the taller southpaw with the longer reach.

Campillo (21-4-1, 7 KOs ) ~ age 33 (6'2") -- Tall southpaw uses the long reach with effective jabs and combinations - also unorthodox in movement. Were he a big puncher he'd not have been a stranger to these shores.

…...................................................................................

The Paul Williams-Nobuhiro Ishida main event that followed surely had a tough act to follow - but not a chance, altho not due to lack of effort. It was simply a matter of too much Paul Williams in size and quality over the brave Ishida of Osaka, Japan.

Both tall jr. middles - Williams at 6'2" and Ishida 6'1-½" in size - but biggest edge was the bigger, stronger and harder punching Williams busy style while working from the port side.

Only pride, and strong chin construction kept Nobuhiro upright and battling back over the full twelve one-sided stanzas.

Official scoring went Williams 120-108 - my unofficial agreed Williams 120-108 in points and 12-0 under round by round method.

Post Scripts: Paul Williams ( 41-2, 27 KO) ~ age 30 - "Punisher" sobriquet pretty much fits with the fast pace from start to finish. Mixes the offense targeting both body and head. Would have no objections to a Saul "Canelo" Alvarez, Julio Cesar Chavez Jr. … or maybe Miguel Cotto. Flip a coin, on paper it sounds A-OK for the viewer.

               Nobuhiro Ishida (24-7-2, 9KO) ~ age 36 - no loss of face - came to fight while armed with smaller caliber than his opponent - but never tossed in the towel.

 GEO  

-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-

Post-Fight Quotes: Tavoris Cloud and Eric Molina from Corpus Christi

Tavoris Cloud:  "I feel like I won the fight.  I knocked him down a few times and was the aggressor throughout.  I wanted to put him away but sometimes you get it and sometimes you don't.

"I wanted to stay busy and be aggressive.  I did that.  He was a busy fighter, and that's what the crowd here in Corpus Christi responded to.  The difference is I was landing the power shots, and that's what the judges responded to.

"I give Campillo credit.  He's a good fighter and he hung around with me.  I think he looked bad in the judges' eyes for celebrating in the ring thinking he had it won while the fight was still going on.  He forgot he was still in a fight.

"When he was throwing the left uppercut, he was catching me with the laces on his wrist, and I think that caused the cuts over my eyes.

"I was never hurt to the point I couldn't keep coming forward and throwing shots.  I closed the distance between us in the later rounds trying to go to the body and stop him from throwing flurries.

He was another bouncy-bouncy guy.  He couldn't deter me from coming forward."

Eric Molina: "I said before this fight that if I had Arreola hurt I would come right at him, and I did just that.  I landed some big right hands.  He was in trouble and holding on for dear life, but he caught me.  I did my best."

 

More:
Williams in a breeze over Ishida - Cloud nips Campillo via split verdict... by George Elsasser