Mediaboss Marketing

TCWH releases Joomla web hosting tutorial for 2012 to help people find a reliable Joomla web hosting risk-free and worry-free.

San Francisco, CA (PRWEB) April 14, 2012

The leading web hosting review site Top-Cheap-Web-Hosting.com (TCWH) launches a new tutorial category for hosting Joomla with their Joomla web hosting review and rating page. The Joomla hosting tutorial is designed to help people find a reliable web host for Joomla by a series of introduction on Joomla shared web hosting prerequisite, Joomla installation, Joomla migration, and Joomla site SEO.

Joomla is the most popular software used to build weblog and large content based websites widely. The typical large sized clients include AOL Corporate, New York Observer, and Sony Music. Joomla is quite easy to create a website or blog because of the visual and easy-to-use user interface. Meanwhile, there are over thousands free Joomla themes, widgets and modules in the community that webmasters can customize their preferable websites easily.

As introduced by TCWH, finding a trust-worth web hosting for Joomla is not easy as using it, even for some senior PHP and Joomla developers. The choice of web hosting based on the apparent features is not trust-worth. The handy tutorials from TCWH are all written based on the practical experience from their knowledgeable technicians, to help people select a proper domain name, find the best web host, create a Joomla site, customize Joomla site, manage site content, and promote site over the Internet.

By following the Joomla hosting tutorial, TCWH had also come out a sorted list of Top 10 Joomla Hosting based on the checkpoints as below. #1 - Joomla integration for how easy people can get start their website. #2 - Joomla themes, widgets and extended modules included with the Joomla web hosting plan. #3 - Joomla optimization features including GZIP, URL Rewrite, etc. #4 - Joomla web hosting performance and reliability. #5 - affordable Joomla web hosting price.

In the case that people are looking for a new opportunity over the Internet by launching a website using Joomla, its worth to check out Joomla web hosting reviews and rating at http://www.top-cheap-web-hosting.com/linux-web-hosting/best-joomla-hosting/.

About Top-Cheap-Web-Hosting.com Top-Cheap-Web-Hosting.com is an independent web hosting review website, rating web hosts based on their real experience and the real customer voice. The site is designed to help people find the best web hosting deal at an affordable rate.

For the original version on PRWeb visit: http://www.prweb.com/releases/prwebjoomla-hosting-tutorial/2012/prweb9403640.htm

Go here to read the rest:
2012 Joomla Web Hosting Tutorial

Jason Mraz may have set the world alight with the white-boy rap The Remedy (I Won't Worry) and the summery pop of 'I'm Yours' but his latest album 'Love is a Four Letter Word' is doing a pretty good job of extinguishing any flames of credibility that he once had. New York Daily News have described the release as being packed with " the emptiest bromides this side of a Tony Robbins infomercial" and other reviewers have been less than kind.

Mraz's breakthrough single 'I'm Yours' was released in 2008. A lot has changed in four years and Mraz may well find that he struggles to find an audience for his new material. According to the New York Daily News, Love may well be a four-letter word, but his album is only a one-star album. A review from Associated Press is kinder, though opts for description, rather than critique of the album. Writing for The Guardian, Caroline Sullivan acknowledges Mraz's obvious musical talent, saying "Lyrically, Mraz may be all fluffy towels and soft blankets, but he pairs his words with a variety of genres that show him to be a cracking musician."

The rest is here:
Jason Mraz - Jason Mraz's Four Letter Word' Met With Lukewarm Reviews

SHAWN McCARTHY OTTAWA From Wednesday's Globe and Mail Published Tuesday, Apr. 17, 2012 4:14PM EDT Last updated Tuesday, Apr. 17, 2012 11:18PM EDT

The federal government is asserting its control over pipelines including the proposed Northern Gateway oil-sands project taking from regulators the final word on approvals and limiting the ability of opponents to intervene in environmental assessments.

In proposed legislation unveiled by Natural Resources Minister Joe Oliver on Tuesday, the Harper government will clear away regulatory hurdles to the rapid development of Canadas natural resource bounty.

Ottawa is aiming to reduce the number of projects that undergo federal environmental assessment by exempting smaller developments completely and by handing over many large ones to the provinces. It will also bring in new measures to prevent project opponents from delaying the assessment process by flooding hearings with individuals who face no direct impacts but want to speak against the development.

At a Toronto press conference, Mr. Oliver said the proposed changes are aimed at providing quicker reviews in order to reduce regulatory uncertainty and thereby create more jobs and investment in Canadas booming resource sector.

We are at a critical juncture because the global economy is now presenting Canada with an historic opportunity to take full advantage of our immense resources, he said. But we must seize the moment. These opportunities wont last forever.

Resource-rich western provinces greeted the proposed changes warmly, saying they are eager to take over environmental assessments. Mr. Oliver said Ottawa will only transfer authority for project reviews to provinces that have similar standards as the federal government.

Provinces in central and Atlantic Canada were more cautious, wanting to know more details before drawing conclusions.

Environmental groups and some aboriginal leaders said the government is sacrificing environmental protection for development, and is intent on railroading all opposition to its vision of rapid development of oil sands and other resources.

A key flash point is the proposed Northern Gateway pipeline, which would carry oil-sands bitumen to the British Columbia coast for export to Asia by supertanker. The Harper government has insisted that it is a national priority to expand pipeline access for energy producers to access fast-growing Asian markets.

Read more from the original source:
Ottawa elbows regulators in quest for final word on pipeline approvals

April 17, 2012, 11:57 AM PDT

Takeaway: Words page and section breaks often confound users. They often enter them when they dont mean to, creating structural problems that the user doesnt know how to eliminate.

Other than styles, page and section breaks probably cause the most confusion and trouble for the untrained user. Documents end up with unwanted breaks that play havoc with page numbering, formats, and printing. Users dont always realize that theyre the problem - they inserted the breaks, whether intentionally or not.

You can create a new page at any time by pressing [Ctrl]+[Enter]. Or, click the Page Break option in the Pages group on the Insert tab. (Page Break is on the Insert menu in Word 2003.) Unfortunately, manual page breaks (also known as hard page breaks) cause trouble because they dont flow with the documents structure. As you add and delete elements, you might find manual page breaks no longer appropriate. Fortunately, theyre easy to delete. Position the cursor at the beginning of the next page and press [Delete]. Or, click the Show/Hide option in the Paragraph group on the Home tab to display the page break element, highlight it, and press Delete. Manual breaks are probably the easiest break problem to find and resolve.

Manual page breaks might be easy to insert, but theyre seldom the best way to break. Sometimes the break really belongs to the text. That happens when you want a break to occur before or after a specific paragraph of text. Consequently, you could end up with an unexpected page break thats all but impossible to get rid of, unless you know its cause. To access these options, click the Paragraph groups dialog launcher and then click the Line And Page Breaks tab.

Word enables the Widow/Orphan Control by default. This option prevents a single line from appearing at the top or bottom of a page. The remaining options, which youll apply as needed, follow:

These options are almost always preferable to a manual break.

Section breaks can be more troublesome than page breaks, because many users dont understand the nature of sections. A section lets you control formatting as needs change. For instance, you might want to print part of or an entire page in landscape in the middle of a document thats using portrait orientation. To do so, youd insert a new section for the landscape components and format that section as landscape. The sections before and after would remain in portrait. To access section breaks, click the Page Layout tab.

Originally posted here:
Troubleshoot page and section breaks in Microsoft Word

Earlier today, the Associated Press's Stylebook sent out the following tweet:

YES: This is wonderful news!We now support the modern usage! [Insert cheeky use of "hopefully" here!] Because among the ranks of the Grammar Rules We Knowingly Break Because Those Rules Are Stupid, the long-standing edict against "hopefully" has long held a place at the top. "Hopefully," the law of grammar has informed us, should be used only in the most literal sense: to describe something that is done in a hopeful manner. Used in the way the majority of English-speakers use it -- as a proxy for hope -- the word is, we are told, simply wrong.

As the AP put it in a previous tweet:

Got that?Do not use it.

The anti-"hopefully" mandate has been a bad grammar rule in the manner of all bad grammar rules: It doesn't track with the way people actually use the language. The ruleis completely out of touch with those it's meant to regulate. And while grammar guides, by nature, will always represent a tension between the vernacular use of a language and the normative use of it ... still, when everyone's just ignoring a rule, that rule demands amendment. We talk about language being a living thing; implied in the clich is the idea that, for living things, "growth" and "life" are pretty much the same thing. And the best way to let language live -- to let it grow, to let it flourish -- is to rid it of obsolete rules, just as the AP has done today.

So: Yay! The change is a small thing, but it's a reminder of a broader truth: that language evolves -- just like the Internet itself -- as a product of end-user innovation. Top-down guidelines and regulations can be valuable; but they are valuable only insofar as they reflect people's habits and assumptions. Language, like any good technology, must be responsive to the people who use it.

More From The Atlantic

Original post:
Grammar Regulators Concede to the 'Modern Usage' of a Word