Mediaboss Marketing

TODAY, September 15, is the International Day of Democracy as declared by the United Nations General Assembly in 2007.

This year's theme - Engaging Young People on Democracy seeks to highlight the challenges and opportunities of young people engaging in democratic processes.

"I call on members of the largest generation of youth in history to confront challenges and consider what you can do to resolve them. To take control of your destiny and translate your dreams into a better future for all," said UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon.

We claim to be living in a democracy, hanging on to that claim since we booted out the Marcos Dictatorship in 1986.

But are we?

How does the UN define democracy? Lets see.

It says: Democracy is a universal value based on the freely expressed will of people to determine their own political, economic, social and cultural systems and their full participation in all aspects of their lives.

If that is so, then whatever is keeping the Administration from passing a Freedom of Information law is definitely not something based on democratic principles; that is if they consider the people and not just themselves.

Truly, majority of those in power do not want an FOI. It will expose them for what they truly are: greedy politicians who have lived off the sweat of the wage earners through the decades that their family is in power. Thus, in the myopic view of the present administration, there is really no urgency for an FOI since majority are not for it, anyway. Majority of them that is.

Still, this is a day worth pondering on simply because we may have been allowing ourselves to be deluded that we are still living in democracy by people who are not above using icons of democracy and democratic principles to deny the people of the real one. Think: Edsa Revolution and all those who are now in power because of it. How many of them are truly standing up for real democracy, let us ask ourselves that in between pondering how much better we are now than we were under a dictatorship

Link:
Editorial: International Day of Democracy

Look at Communism, A 1955
Email samsclassictv@aol.com Sam #39;s Classic TV YOUTUBE https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC7Ed8pFdrUrR4qo9EOFwmXw Sam #39;s retro TV YOUTUBE https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCUML4HVONhdmseKjlhKZzzQ...

By: Sam #39;s Retro TV

View post:
Look at Communism, A 1955 - Video

PyroFalkon #39;s Sims 4 Socialism Challenge Trailer
Let #39;s play The Sims 4! Jon "PyroFalkon" Michael, the writer of the IGN Entertainment strategy guide wiki for The Sims 4, has created a set of house rules to make The Sims 4 more challenging,...

By: PyroFalkon #39;s Let #39;s Play Extravaganza

Read the original here:
PyroFalkon's Sims 4 Socialism Challenge Trailer - Video

IN 1949, Albert Einstein wrote a short essay entitled Why Socialism? In it he made a compellingly simple case for why humanity had to build a new social order based on fundamentally different principles than those which prevailed in the capitalist present. Einsteins political views were not necessarily a secret during his lifetime, but in death he has been stripped entirely of his socialist politics.

The great man is, of course, not alone. In this country and all over the world, innumerable individuals who openly espoused rebellion against state and class power, patriarchy and national oppression, have been rechristened as dedicated loyalists after their departure from this world. Some icons have been perversely transformed into corporate brands, Che Guevara most obviously so.

Accordingly, a vast majority of ordinary people are exposed only to caricatures of figures like Einstein and Guevara. Hence their understanding of socialism is at best vague and at worst based entirely on mainstream propaganda.

Over the past few years, interest in the socialist tradition has undergone something of a revival amongst ordinary Europeans. Intellectuals like Slavoj Zizek and Alain Badiou who overtly celebrate the writings of revolutionaries like Lenin and propagate the original Communist Hypothesis have been important figures in this regard. Given what happened in the years following the collapse of actually existing socialism in 1991, the growing influence of a body of socialist thinkers is no small matter.

Having said this, the dominant trend prevails in most countries. Take India. From the late 1970s onwards, communist parties formed many successive governments in West Bengal and Kerala, and leftists were reasonably well-represented in the intellectual mainstream. Over the past decade, Indian socialism has taken a beating, and is now at its lowest ebb in decades.

The socialist project has suffered in no small part due to its own contradictions. At one and the same time viewed as the culmination of the Enlightenment principles and a rejection of capitalism, the socialist ideal has not yet fully freed itself from the cul-de-sac of modernisation.

Yet we cannot ignore just how many resources were dedicated to demonising socialism in the 20th century, and how this legacy continues to inform politics, culture and just about everything else in society.

In Pakistan the combination of the American Empire, Pakistans establishment, and right-wing political forces hounded anyone who harboured even sympathy for leftist ideas. Communists were openly decried as atheists, and therefore enemies of Islam and Pakistan. Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto was not a communist, and the extent of his commitment to socialism can be debated. Yet he, Pakistans elected prime minister, suffered acute character assassination due to his socialist leanings despite his initiatives to prove he was no less a Muslim than any other Pakistani.

As a teacher in a public university, I am reminded everyday of just how deeply anti-socialist propaganda has seeped into the veins of society. Only ignoramuses would ignore the contributions of Marx and others in that tradition to the corpus of modern social theory, yet even the slightest mention of Marxist writing draws gasps from a scandalised student body, convinced that socialists and communists seek to de-fang Islam and corrupt societys moral fabric.

It is ironic that since it was Islamised in the 1980s the same period in which socialism has been most vilified Pakistani society has become more individualistic and amoral than before, ie the more we wear our Islamic morality on our sleeves, the more we tend towards transactional practices in which theres no pretence of collective betterment.

Go here to read the rest:
Interest in the socialist tradition has seen a revival.

British Tea Party Podcast | The Reunion
So yes, It was about time we all got back together after all this time. However the future of this podcast is in your hands! Would you like to see this as a ...

By: TheGamingGeek | Drink Tea and Game On!

More here:
British Tea Party Podcast | The Reunion - Video