Media Search:



Venezuelans Protest for 'Resurrection of Democracy'

Hundreds of protesters rallied on Sunday to demand the "resurrection" of Venezuelan democracy while effigies of both President Nicolas Maduro and opposition leaders were paraded for burning in a local Easter Day tradition.

Though millions of Venezuelans have headed for Caribbean beaches and family gatherings over the Easter period, student demonstrators have sought to keep a nearly three-month protest movement going with religious-themed demonstrations.

After a barefoot rally and a "Via Crucis" march in the style of Jesus' tortured walk towards crucifixion, the students gathered on Sunday in a Caracas square for a demonstration denominated "Resurrection of Democracy." Easter marks the day Christians believe Jesus was resurrected from the dead after being crucified.

Members of the national police confront demonstrators during a protest against the government of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro in Caracas on April 20, 2014.

First published April 21 2014, 7:54 AM

More here:
Venezuelans Protest for 'Resurrection of Democracy'

Myanmar pro-democracy activist Win Tin dies

InterAksyon.com The online news portal of TV5

YANGON -- Win Tin, one of the founders of Myanmar's pro-democracy opposition and its longest-serving political prisoner, diedMondayaged 84 after striving for decades to bring freedom to a nation under military dictatorship.

The former journalist and veteran campaigner, whose almost two decades in jail failed to dull his commitment to the democratic cause, had suffered worsening ill health in recent weeks.

He died in hospital in Yangon earlyMonday, National League for Democracy party spokesman Nyan Win told AFP.

A funeral service will be heldon Wednesday.

Win Tin, a towering figure within the democracy movement, formed the NLD with Aung San Suu Kyi in 1988 in the wake of a student-led pro-democracy uprising. He was imprisoned the following year for his political activities.

He reiterated his support for party leader Suu Kyi in the days before he died, according to his long-time assistant Yar Zar.

"It is like the world has been lost. But we have many things to do. We will continue as he asked and will follow his way to democracy," he said.

Myanmar began its emergence from nearly half a century of military rule in 2011, under a quasi-civilian government that has won international praise for reforms including the release of hundreds of political prisoners.

Suu Kyi, who was freed from years of house arrest in 2010, has also been welcomed into parliament at the helm of her party and has indicated her wish to become president after 2015 elections.

See the article here:
Myanmar pro-democracy activist Win Tin dies

WORMS EYEVIEW: The imperative of hands-on democracy now

CAGAYAN DE ORO CITY (MindaNews / 21 April) Weve had over a century of democracy and electoral politics but real democracy and inclusive developmentits putative by-productcontinues to be elusive. All the public rituals, the sermonizing, and the verbal admonition to foster the democratic spirit or practice has not made a dent on our society.

We have yet to institutionalize true representative democracy or good governance. The people in charge remain presumptuous, autocratic, and manipulative.

There is no statesmanship. The public service has transmogrified into self-service. The laws are circumvented or openly violated.

Criminality with impunity reigns on all levels. Putschists or coup plotters are rewarded with senate seats. Corrupt or notoriously immoral politicos are elected or re-elected. Thus money politics and demagoguery prevail.

But our electorate remains passive. If it acts willfully at all, it chooses autocrats and oligarchs, or enthrones dynastic rulers.

In light of all this, it is unlikely that our political values and institutions will mature anytime soon, let alone attain parity with those of progressive nations.

For Filipinos to learn the ways of democracy, it is not enough to preach the principles or the spirit of democratic practice. Verbal motivation does not suffice.

What is sorely needed is actual experience in the ways of democracy, not ineffectual slogans and sanctimonious advocacy by do-gooders who themselves are not exactly paragons of responsible citizenship.

And now, in Mindanao, our second largest island, will be added another layer to the dysfunctional system: the so-called ministerial form of governmentone that the MILF itself characterizes as asymmetrical to the present structure and process familiar to everyone. Not a reassuring term; it means irregular, lop-sided, uneven, unbalanced.

A century of attempts to make the current system work has been difficult enough; how do they propose to make an unaccustomed asymmetrical system work? The truth is, the areas contemplated for MILF hegemony are notorious for scuttling democracy and turning electoral politics a travesty.

Originally posted here:
WORMS EYEVIEW: The imperative of hands-on democracy now

Communism – Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Communism is a socialist social system in which the means of production are commonly owned, and which has no state, money, or social classes. It is also a political way of thinking and an idea of how to get to such a society. Communism says that the people of any and every place in the world should all own the factories and farms that are used to make goods and food. This social process is known as common ownership. The main differences between socialism and communism are that, in a Communist society, the state and money do not exist. Work is not something a person must do to stay alive but is rather something people can choose whether or not to do.

According to Communist writers and thinkers, the goal of communism is to create a classless society by eliminating the power of the bourgeoisie (the ruling class, who own the means of production) and creating a dictatorship of the proletariat (the working class). Communism is not anti-individualism, but they do believe that decisions should be made to benefit the collective population rather than to serve the greed of one or several individuals.

Some socialists believed that socialists could take state power in democratic elections. They tried to make socialist parties in their own countries win elections. Others thought that the state was created to maintain capitalism and that capitalists would never allow communists to take power. They thought there needed to be a war or revolution in order to create a new workers' state.

Many countries have claimed to be workers' states, but many communists do not agree with this. Most of these countries did hold elections, but in most cases the only candidates that were allowed belonged to the communist party. The elections were not free ones (many candidates with differing views were not allowed to run for office). Some of these countries' leaders such as Stalin or Mao Zedong had many strict laws and sometimes a secret police force to keep themselves in power. People could be sent to prison or killed for speaking against the government.

Most of these countries had a legislature to make laws. Most of the time, the legislature usually did not have any real power. They usually just approved the proposals of the leaders. The Communist Party had all the real political power.

Most of the countries that claimed to be workers states either had a violent revolution or were invaded by a country that left behind a government. Some democratic countries today have active communist parties, such as in India, Italy and France.

In some countries, especially those that used to be ruled by communist parties, the communist party is illegal or discouraged from holding power (like in Eastern Europe).

In 1848, Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels wrote The Communist Manifesto. It was a short book with the basic ideas of communism. Most socialists and communists today still use this book to help them understand politics and economics. Many non-communists read it too, even if they do not agree with everything in it.

Karl Marx said that for society to change into a communist way of living, there would have to be a transitional period. During this transitional period, the workers would govern society. Marx was very interested in the experience of the Paris Commune of 1870, when the workers of Paris ran the city following the defeat of the French Army by the Prussian Army. He thought that this practical experience was more important than the theoretical views of the various radical groups.

Many groups and individuals liked Marx's ideas. By the beginning of the twentieth century there was a world-wide socialist movement called Social Democracy. It was influenced by his ideas. They said that the workers in different countries had more in common with each other than the workers had in common with the bosses within their own nation. In 1917, Vladimir Lenin and Leon Trotsky led a Russian group called the Bolsheviks in the October Revolution. They got rid of the temporary government of Russia which was formed after the February Revolution against the Tsar (Emperor). They established the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (Also called the Soviet Union or USSR).

View post:
Communism - Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Why Socialism? – Video


Why Socialism?
The Communist Party USA envisions a 21st century Bill of Rights socialism. We #39;ll be discussing our vision and how to get there at our Chicago convention June...

By: Communist Party USA

Original post:
Why Socialism? - Video