Media Search:



The right needs to get over its pointless obsession with trolling liberals – The Week Magazine

Sign Up for

Our free email newsletters

How far would you go to make the people you don't like mad? Over the weekend, we found out how the Conservative Political Action Conference, the premier gathering of conservative activists, answers that question. The conference invited semi-famous internet troll Milo Yiannopoulos to be a keynote speaker at this year's confab, then disinvited him after videos emerged of him condoning sex between 13-year-olds and adults. The misogyny and racism Yiannopoulos traffics in were apparently not a problem, but pedophilia was just a bit too far.

Yiannopoulos is, in the end, not a particularly interesting figure on his own terms (see here if you want to know what he's all about). He's a troll, a provocateur, someone whose schtick is to say outrageous things and then goad liberals into objecting to him or even trying to keep him from speaking on college campuses, and they often eagerly oblige. Indeed, before cancelling Yiannopoulos' appearance, the head of the American Conservative Union, which mounts CPAC, defended the invite to a conference that will feature speeches by President Trump, Vice President Pence, Stephen Bannon, Reince Priebus, and a lengthy list of political and media luminaries from the right on the grounds that it was good to hear Yiannopoulos' "important perspective" on fighting political correctness on campus.

But eventually, the line of unacceptability was located. Yiannopoulos might object that Republicans just elected a guy who bragged about sexually assaulting women, intentionally walked in on underage girls getting undressed, and had a habit of meeting girls as young as 10 and imagining himself dating them. But the question is not whether Yiannopoulos was cast aside, but why he became such a celebrity on the right in the first place.

The reason is that conservatives are obsessed with the idea of making liberals mad, and that's something Yiannopoulos is really good at.

One of the pillars of Donald Trump's presidential campaign was this idea that he would free his supporters from the straightjacket of political correctness and let them tell those bastards exactly what they think. As one popular T-shirt at Trump rallies during the campaign read, "Trump 2016: F--k your feelings." This antagonizing impulse is behind things like "rolling coal," in which owners of diesel trucks trick them out to expel as much black smoke as possible; they take particular delight in enveloping a Prius in a cloud of fumes, then posting the video to YouTube or Instagram. Take that, enviro-hippie! It's why Sarah Palin showed up at her CPAC speech a few years ago with a Big Gulp, just to tell Michael Bloomberg where he could shove his soda tax to the lusty cheers of the crowd.

This is a kind of public performance of negative partisanship, the increasing tendency of Americans on both sides of the aisle to define their political identities less by their affection for their own party and more by their dislike of the other party. If what's important is that the other side is wrong, what could be better than figuring out what really gets their goat, then doing exactly that thing, as loudly as possible?

There's a problem, though: Exasperating your opponents may feel good, but it doesn't actually accomplish anything.

This is a question all political action has to confront: What good does this do? There will always be some distance between any kind of political engagement and the changes one would like to see, but if you find yourself saying, "Man, this is really going to tick them off! Hah!" then you might want to do some thinking about whether you're achieving something or just having fun.

Let's take as a counterexample the left's most visible political action of the moment, in which Democrats turn up in large numbers at the town hall meetings of their Republican representatives, making a lot of noise in opposition to Republican plans to repeal the Affordable Care Act. There's no doubt that forcing your representative (particularly if he's from the other party) to squirm and even make a dash for his car to escape the wrath of his constituents is exciting. But the protest also increases pressure on that representative, making it clear to him that there will be a political cost to repeal and perhaps making him more likely to seek a more humane solution to the health care system's problems. The attendant news coverage can have a similar effect on other members of Congress, who are governed by fear of the voters' displeasure. It might also encourage other citizens to get involved.

That public performance is driven by a logic focused on the location of power and the processes of policy change. Trolling, on the other hand, is almost always focused on the feeling of power it gives the troll, the power to enrage and outrage.

But frankly, that's the easy part. Anybody can make somebody else mad, especially if you're using a pose of rebelliousness and transgression to punch downward on behalf of those at the top. That doesn't mean it can't serve a purpose Trump's brave stance in defense of jerkishness was a key part of his appeal, so it probably brought out a significant number of people to vote who might not have otherwise. But in the end, if the most important thing to you is how many people you've ticked off, you probably haven't accomplished much at all.

Excerpt from:
The right needs to get over its pointless obsession with trolling liberals - The Week Magazine

Fake News Site Lets Liberals Live In Alternate Reality Where Hillary Is President – Daily Caller

5492570

Liberalsseeking refuge from reality now have a fake news website where they can pretend to live in a world where Hillary Clinton is president.

In the midst of a Constitutional crisis, this is our response, the sites description reads. Long live the true president, Hillary Rodham Clinton.

The sites proprietors do not identify themselves online, and did not return TheDCs request for comment, but their articles suggest they have liberal leanings.

The sites articles single out prominent Republicans like Texas Sen. Ted Cruz and White House press secretary Sean Spicer for mockery.

Democratic presidential nominee former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton waves to the crowd as she walks on the stage during the third U.S. presidential debate at the Thomas & Mack Center on October 19, 2016 in Las Vegas, Nevada. (Drew Angerer/Getty Images)

On Monday, Senator Ted Cruz went on Ellen to confess that he, of course, killed Deputy White House Counsel Vince Foster in 1993, reads one recent article, which refers to Cruz as the Republican front-runner to take on President Hillary Rodham Clinton in 2020.

Follow Hasson on Twitter @PeterJHasson

See more here:
Fake News Site Lets Liberals Live In Alternate Reality Where Hillary Is President - Daily Caller

Liberals butcher Bollywood One More Time – WAtoday

Just when you thought the WA Liberal's cringe worthy and hilarious dance moves couldn't get any worse, it appears party members are serial offenders when it comes to busting out awkward moves on the dance floor.

At the Liberal's campaign launch on Sunday, members can be seen clumsily cutting a rug and clapping out of sync to Daft Punk's One More Time.

The daggy dancing was only elevated slightly thanks to Liberal deputy leader Liza Harvey doing what could only be described as a robotic and rigid impersonation of the Twist.

Now a video has emerged of Liberal MP's boogieing to Bollywood-style tunes at a fundraiser for wannabe pollie Jim Seth who is running for the party in the seat of Bassendean.

And TreasurerMike Nahan, who foxtrotted to back of the corny choreography at the Liberal launch, is on the stage leading the charge in theBollywood Dance Workshop fundraiser filmed in December.

We are just not sure what he is doing.

At one-stage it looks like the Riverton MP is trying to put a fire out on his left arm, then he whoops it by creating his own dance move which we will dub, ringing the church bells.

The Treasurer'sown version of Dirty Dancing doesn't end there as he wiggles his hips and does a half-version of the sprinkler, before it looks like he pops out a hip.

Meanwhile Ms Harvey, Planning Minister Donna Faragher, Attorney General Michael Mischin and Parliamentary Speaker Michael Sutherland are waving their arms in the air, just like they just don't care.

It's just their cavorting isn't coordinated.

We are not suggesting the Liberals got stuck into any exotic Indian drinks, but it does seem a few might be a little tipsy while tripping the light fantastic.

At one point in the video, Mr Seth can be seen walking off the dance floor. We are not sure if decided to head home after watching his Liberal mates bust out the whitest moves ever.

And it also clears up the mystery who the man with the giant ribbon with the words "I'm Jim" on it was on stage during the Liberals' butchering of One More Time.

Read the rest here:
Liberals butcher Bollywood One More Time - WAtoday

Dispatch from the Frontiers of Media Science – National Review

For a perfect example of what the New York Times has become, one need look no farther than the Upshot column in this mornings paper, which quotes an Internet data-analytics firm and a psychology professor (the Times would quote a professor if a Little League game was rained out) to explain why liberal readers prefer liberal news sources and conservatives readers prefer conservative ones. In case you have trouble grasping the concept, the piece is illustrated with half a dozen bar graphs.

Most telling, perhaps, are the particular stories the writer chose as examples: President Trumps false claims about the attendance at his inauguration, and Kellyanne Conways references to a nonexistent Bowling Green massacre. Why did liberals spend more time following these stories than conservatives? The writer suggests one reason could be that articles by outlets with more liberal readers were more engaging, then undercuts his argument by quoting a Daily Kos headline that is lackluster even by that sites low standards.

The actual explanation is obvious: Only a liberal would consider Trumps exaggerating the size of something, or one of his aides getting a place name wrong, to be news. When Obama was president, we had our fun with 57 states and I dont speak Austrian and corpseman, while liberals shrugged them off. But when your side is in power, you focus on things that actually matter.

Follow this link:
Dispatch from the Frontiers of Media Science - National Review

Who’s Who In The Race For DNC Chair And Their Plans For Democrats To Win Again – NPR

From left: Democrats Keith Ellison, Jamie Harrison, Tom Perez and Pete Buttigieg are competing to become the next chair of the Democratic National Committee. Donna Brazile has been acting in the role since Rep. Debbie Wasserman-Schultz resigned after a hack of the organization showed it was not providing equal support to candidates in the presidential primary. Lauren Victoria Burke, J. Scott Applewhite, Molly Riley, Joe Raymond/AP hide caption

From left: Democrats Keith Ellison, Jamie Harrison, Tom Perez and Pete Buttigieg are competing to become the next chair of the Democratic National Committee. Donna Brazile has been acting in the role since Rep. Debbie Wasserman-Schultz resigned after a hack of the organization showed it was not providing equal support to candidates in the presidential primary.

Against a backdrop of turmoil and after big losses in November, the Democratic National Committee votes this week for its next leader. The winner of the DNC chair race will likely reflect whether the committee's voting members think it prudent to align their party with the Hillary Clinton-Barack Obama camp, the Bernie Sanders camp or neither.

With the fast-moving developments of the Trump administration, Democrats have struggled to focus their efforts. But the coalescence of a grassroots resistance, seen in protests across the country, has generated new confidence and energy in those running.

The new chair will replace Donna Brazile, who took the job on an interim basis after Debbie Wasserman Schultz resigned the leadership in July, when WikiLeaks released emails that appeared to show DNC officials discussing how to hurt Sanders in the primaries.

To get on the ballot, a candidate needs the signatures of 20 out of 447 voting members. The ballot goes out on Tuesday, then members will vote during the party's meeting in Atlanta on Saturday, in as many rounds as it takes for a candidate to garner 224 votes.

Former Labor Secretary Tom Perez is trying to solidify front-runner status: Last week he contacted DNC members saying that he had locked in support from 180 voters. Rep. Keith Ellison, expected to be the main challenger to Perez, replied with a letter to members that said it was inappropriate for a candidate to try to "make the race sound like it is over," adding, "We are very confident in our whip count and are in an excellent position to win."

Here is a look at candidates Perez, Ellison, Jaime Harrison, Pete Buttigieg and Sally Boynton Brown. Highlights from interviews with NPR and others indicate where they want to take the party:

Perez, 55, represents the Obama camphe was secretary of Labor from 2013 until last month, and was considered the most liberal member of President Obama's Cabinet. Before joining the Labor Department, he was head of the U.S. Justice Department's Civil Rights Division.

What went wrong in 2016

"What voters heard was 'he's feeling my pain, he's feeling my anxiety. And what they heard all too frequently from the Clinton campaign was, 'Vote for me because he's crazy.' I will stipulate to the accuracy of that statement, but that's not an affirmative message," Perez told the Washington Post.

How the DNC can be more useful

"We have to up our game," Perez told NPR in January. "And the reason I'm running is because we have to make sure that we are providing help and partnership with the state parties. Organizing has to be a 12-month endeavor. You can't show up at a church every fourth October and say, 'vote for me,' and call that persuasion. ...

"What I want to do if I have the good fortune of being elected chair is build a party infrastructure in partnership with our state partners so that we have organizers in place in urban, suburban, and rural communities across America so that we are a force on important issues, whether it's voting rights, whether it's cybersecurity. And we need to have a director of cybersecurity at the DNC, which we currently don't have."

On whether Democrats should pursue obstruction or cooperation

"We need to take the fight to Donald Trump. If they're talking about deporting children, we're going to take the fight to Donald Trump. If Donald Trump wants to raise the minimum wage to $15, yes, I will work with Donald Trump. But you know what? If they are going to try to have a deportation task force and they're going to try to continue to deny climate change, you're damn right we need to fight. And we will continue that fight because this is a battle for the heart and soul of who we are as Americans," he told NPR.

Key endorsements: former Vice President Joe Biden, former Attorney General Eric Holder, former Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack and former Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius

Ellison, 53, represents Minnesota's 5th District, which includes Minneapolis and some of its suburbs. In 2007, he became the first Muslim elected to U.S. Congress.

What went wrong in 2016

"The thing is that before 2008, we had the 50-state strategy, and that is in fact still pretty popular among DNC members," told Vox in January. "As you notice, we did pretty well in 2006; we did pretty well in 2008. I think that's because we still had enough connectivity in place from that 50-state strategy, but as time wore on, the tremendous popularity of Barack Obama, his amazing rhetorical skills, his just unparalleled ability to explain things and to inspire people really is the fuel that we lived on. Because of that, we lost a lot."

What Democrats need to learn from Republicans

"I do not believe that Democrats have identified the fact that voter expansion has to be a strategic goal of ours, and yet Republicans clearly are aware that voter suppression must be a strategic goal of theirs," he told Vox. "They're actively suppressing the vote. They're doing it in 50 states. They're doing it with a PR program. They're doing it with a state legislative program. They're doing it with a city program, just simply not enough voting machines. They're doing it with a legal program. What are we doing? We're doing state by state. Oregon's doing great work, but what about others? This should be 50 pieces of legislation introduced in all states that expand the vote. That's clearly what we need to be doing. The DNC has to help do that."

How the Democrats can win

"Voter turnout has got to be something that is on the mind of every rank-and-file Democrat, every Democratic officeholder. We must, in terms of turnout, think in terms of expanding the electorate beyond the people who are the likely voters in the swing states. Turnout has got to be key," Ellison told Vox.

"When I was elected in 2006, my district had the lowest turnout in the state of Minnesota. Now it's the highest, and it's consistently the highest. ... We don't have no statewide Republicans. We used to. You remember Tim Pawlenty, who used to be the governor, and you remember Norm Coleman. Why can't a Norm Coleman or a Tim Pawlenty get back into statewide office? Because in the Fifth Congressional District, we spike the vote so high they cannot get in."

Key endorsements: Sen. Bernie Sanders; Sen. Elizabeth Warren; Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer; New Hampshire Democratic Party Chairman Raymond Buckley, who dropped out of the DNC race over the weekend

Harrison, 40, is chair of the South Carolina Democratic Party. He was previously executive director of the House Democratic Caucus and worked for the lobbying firm the Podesta Group.

On what went wrong

"We got spoiled because we had the political phenom of Barack Obama. And we won in '08, and we won in '12, but we lost sight of it's not just about 1600 Pennsylvania. It's about also those folks who are working and representing people on Main Street," Harrison told NPR.

Where party goes from here

"The people who are elected on local levels have just as much impact, if not more, on the day-to-day lives of citizens," he told NPR. "And so we can't just be focused on the White House. If we do what we have to do on a state level, then the White House is gravy. And that's the focus. ... And let me tell you this look at the victories in 2006 and in 2008. Howard Dean started the 50-state strategy in 2006. I don't know if folks remember. The 2004 election was probably just as sobering of election for Democrats. We lost everything. But what happened is Howard Dean came, enacted this 50-state strategy, and we won the House and the Senate back in '06. And then based on that foundation, we grew the majorities in the House and the Senate and added the president."

Why he should win

"If I become DNC chair at the age of 40, I'll probably half the average age of Democratic leadership in Washington, D.C. ... I bring a different perspective," he told NPR. "I will probably be the if elected chair probably the only person that's ever been on food stamps that's been chairman of the Democrat Party, the only chair that will have over $160,000 of student loan debt. I mean, I can relate to the story of so many in this country who started behind the start line and now are trying to become successful."

Key endorsements: Reps. James Clyburn, Tim Ryan, Marcia Fudge, and John Larson

Buttigieg is the 35-year-old mayor of South Bend, Ind. He's an officer in the U.S. Navy Reserve and left office temporarily in 2014 to serve in Afghanistan.

Where the party needs to go

"One thing that I've noticed about the other side of the aisle is they are very patient in building their majorities. You know, you had organizations that started by running people for school board in the '80s and are seeing dividends on that now. And we've got to have the same patience," he told NPR. "We, as a party, can't treat the next cycle like it's the only one that matters. For example, you know, 2020 is a year that will have huge implications for redistricting. And so we've got to be looking at the statehouses, not treating the presidency like it's the only office that matters."

Why it's crucial to have a message that's more than anger

"There have been a lot of outrages coming from Washington in the last few weeks, and they rightly inspire a level of anger, but we can't have that be the only thing anybody hears from us. We've got to be talking about what our values actually are and what the policies are that flow from them," he told NPR. "When we're talking about things like the deportation rates, we should also be talking about the importance of family, why we believe it's important to keep families intact and allow families to stay together. Every time we're saying no to something, we've got to be saying yes to something else. And I do think that we can have an energy that is at or above the level of what you saw with the tea party."

On whether town hall protests are a good strategy

"I think the important thing right now is to really lift up our voices and speak to the values that make us Democrats. You know, one of the things that's striking about the town halls is a lot of them are very specifically about issues like whether people are going to have their health care taken away," he told NPR. "And the more we can have this discussion focus on how ordinary people are going to be affected by the decisions that are being made in Washington, then the better chance we have of reconnecting with a lot of parts of the country that didn't really feel like they were in touch with the Democratic Party in the last go around. ... Compromise is only possible when the other party is working in good faith. And if there's one thing that Democrats in Congress in Washington learned the hard way about congressional Republicans it's that there's not a lot of people there in good faith."

Why he should win

"We're all saying that we've got to engage a new generation. We've all said that we need to get back to the state and local level. And so my contention is if we're saying we want engage a new generation, bring in a leader from a new generation. If we're saying we want to compete and win in red and purple states, find somebody who's been competing and winning in as red a state as it gets, Mike Pence's Indiana," he told NPR. "And if we're recognizing that the solutions are not going to come from Washington, D.C., put in somebody who doesn't get up in the morning and go to an office in Washington, D.C., every day."

Key endorsements: former Maryland Gov. Martin O'Malley, former DNC chair and Pennsylvania Gov. Ed Rendell, former Ohio Gov. Ted Strickland

Boynton Brown, in her early 40s, has been the executive director of the Idaho Democratic Party since 2012.

On what went wrong

"Well, I really think that we have lost focus as a party. I don't think we have any overarching identity message. We've let the Republicans frame the debate and frame our party for a really long time. And, frankly, I will say that in losing the amount of statehouses that we've lost, we've also allowed them to legislate. And what we know is that they've been passing really dangerous voter suppression laws, really stripping Americans of their rights and their freedoms," she told NPR in January.

"And we have not had an organization who's designed to fight back. We have 57 state parties who have been doing that to the best of their abilities. But it's time that we had a DNC really designed to look at not just the president of the United States and that seat but every single seat all the way down to school board and city council and county commissioner seats."

On what's next

"Ultimately, I think the Democratic Party's job is to save democracy and to be the fighters for freedom," she told NPR. "Republicans have been stripping us of our freedoms. There's a lot of evidence to suggest that our constitutional rights can be under fire in this next administration. And we absolutely must be of powerful voice to push back on anything that potentially is going to come down the road."

Key endorsements: California DNC member Christine Pelosi

More:
Who's Who In The Race For DNC Chair And Their Plans For Democrats To Win Again - NPR