Media Search:



Three Steps to Take Control Back from the Media Anyone Can Do – Huffington Post

Are you suffering from confirmation bias? Thats the tendency to interpret new evidence as confirmation of ones existing beliefs or theories. Its part of how we humans soothe ourselves as we ponder the noisiness of conflicting information. We yearn for what we want. Our minds are delighted by the things that support it and repulsed by the things that refute our desires.

If we are disciplined and objective, we would methodically sift through the information, culling the facts from fictions, and balancing the pieces into a real answer accepting the logic of it even if it might not be to our liking. But we are not Vulcans. We are human. We are the sum of our emotions. Our emotions can be toyed with. In the internet age, we are manipulated constantly; not by ideas, but by something even more powerful, revenue.

News media outlets, regardless of where they fall in the political spectrum, are businesses. It does not matter where the fall in the political spectrum. It does not matter if they are tediously wordy or outrageously provocative. They tell stories fashioned to appeal to targeted audiences. Their job is to capture us; mind share in the societal pie slicing dreams of the press; just the eyeballs are enough in the case of the rest of the Internet. Their mission is to gain ownership of our confirmation biases and reinforce our emotions to pull us in so that we see them as our portal to the world within which they can place the most important content of all, advertising.

The media does their marketing and packaging very well. So well that people come to believe that other media outlets are garbage compared to the one that caresses their emotional needs the most. The reality is that theres no foundation to that faith. Its a myth. Its your own confirmation bias working against you being able to be objective.

In matters of human tolerance and national interest, such blind faith in the packaging of a business working to beguile your attention and convince you to spit on the attempts of others has some very bad consequences. It leads to overzealous partisanship. It leads to a breakdown of social cohesion. It leads to lifelong relationships floundering.

And for what? Is that worth deconstructing American society for? I would say no. But how does one go about becoming invulnerable to media bias? More important, how does one shed the mental burden of ones personal confirmation bias to see clearly and objectively again?

Here are three things to try,

1. Be honest about your biases; then, dont feed them.

We all have biases. What I love about Americans is that each of us is a collection of eclectic and often inexplicably conflicting individual biases. Some of them come from the cultures we grew up in and live in. Other from the things we have learned through education or life experience. Each of our biases is judgmental and self-soothing; but they also connect us to other members of the society we live in. These connections crave affirmation. Normally we can moderate these cravings. But the ability to do so is severely weakened by constant bombardment by external noise and artificially induced stressed. The term for that whether its self-sought or forced upon you is brainwashing.

Youll notice that I dont seem to really care what your bias is about. Thats because there will always be some media outlet, some cause that wants to feed your bias and turn it into an addiction. Its important to be aware that you are the buyer and not the seller in this mental transaction. The message that you need them to be complete in your craving is not true. The media is not your arbiter of self-worth affirmation. Ever!

What you really need is to be aware that your internal control of your biases affects your tolerance to others and that being taken too far down the path of addition makes you unproductively intolerant. Make enough people addicts and society breaks thread by tender thread of humanity. Thats not actually a good idea. People know this intuitively. One of the reasons people are so stressed out is because we know this is a bad idea. But we dont have a concept to frame our minds about how to deal with it.

The message here is that its important for all of us to know our limits and know that there comes a point that, for our own good, we need to learn to know what coming from the satellites, fiber optic cables and WiFi routers that connect our biases to the media is just noise. They want the page views, the Nielsen ratings, the Pew poll results. It doesnt matter whether its you or some other bias connection that gets it for them. But we are the ones that have actual control. They can ask us to bite their shiny fishing lures. We can say no thanks.

2. Triangulate your news media consumption.

The drug to charm bias in the media is spin. Spin is the twist on the news that adds the conformation bias element to a story. All media outlets report the same facts; but the spin they induce around those facts can range from slight to extreme distortions; including, but not limited to, altering the facts to fit the spin. Ive always interpreted the term alt-fact to mean altered as opposed to alternate fact. You cant really change a fact. You can only spin it. And with a plethora of real and fake media combined with analytic, opinion-editorial, propaganda and message for hire sources on the Internet, the variations on spin are mind boggling; as are the methods by which these organizations attempt to dangle their lures in front of your face.

Given this degree of carpet bombing, most people consume news by finding media outlets in a narrow range of comfortable spin, consume these as truth, and reject everything else; a classic confirmation bias marketing win! We all know people who are confirmation bias addicts. If you are still a tolerant person after the brainwave EMP attack of 2016, you know people who will only look at news outlets championing President Trump #MAGA tide AND you will know people who will only watch outlets gathering the resistance. Maybe you are one of those people who has chosen one path or the other. Its nuts. Its an artifact of a nation on Internet crack that does not know how to control the technological monster it created.

In the Internet age, bias comfort news consumption is exactly the wrong way to manage ones interaction with the media. No. The civic duty of an informed citizen at this point is to learn the mechanics of how to map the spin and cancel it out. How do you do that?

a. Start with your bias comfort zone and examine it. It will likely come up in one of two clusters. A central cluster around very traditional trusted sources like network news and major papers; or, a biased cluster to towards one corner of the political spectrum. Either initial point in fine for this exercise. What is important to realize is that it will explain why its so easily irritates you to interact with other people whose comfort zone is not in the little self-segregated corner you are in. You are literally not in the same virtual universes. This realization moment alone will begin to open your mind.

b. The next thing you need to do is objectively examine the media outlets landscape, broadcast and online, and find sources that provide what lets call transparent spin. Transparent spin is the result of a media outlets market decision to specialize in attracting an off-center audience segment. Transparent spin outlets provide sufficient indications of audience bias preferences sufficient to help you see and cancel out the spin effects in your own news analysis but are not so outrageously partisan that you have to spend an overly tedious amount of time ruling out alternative content effects. There are three corners of a triangle to look for; these being, transparent left spin, transparent right spin, and breaking news center. Breaking news center is an outlet that lets you measure the tenacity of news as it emerges and dominates the news cycle. Ideally you want a 24/7 cable news network in each corner of the triangle because these news outlets are on a constant scramble to fill air time. Something must go up that satellite uplink; including, boring nothingness if the planet is having one of its rare blissful days. No pulling punches. In the United States broadcasting industry in 2017, the three most commonly used corners the fit this bill are MSNBC, FOX News, and CNN. Each of these outlets also has a dot-com online news bureau with staff reporters that fill in details behind their on-air coverage. If you are suffering from confirmation bias addiction, something in the triangle doesnt taste right. The more corners that are bitter, the greater your bias problem. Like I said, no pulling punches, it just is.

You should never watch a major news story without checking all three triangulation points. Usually, it should take you 5 to 10 minutes of watching before each outlet becomes repetitive air fill and you can move on. You can check for additional information again checking the online sites of your triangulation points. This will tell you more about the underlying currents of what to believe or question about a story than watching any single sourcefair or biasedever will. Its what turns you from an audience member into an informed auditor of news.

3. Read the original sources.

This is the part where you were probably expecting me to say, once youve done your initial research the next thing you should do is check your bias comfort sources. Im not. Going for your bias comfort sources is entertainment for your mind. It also takes you into territory where the additional spin that is part of a blatantly biased source needs more fact checking than you likely have in your possession.

No. The next thing you need to do is learn to read for the links in the online articles of your triangulation points that point to the original sources behind the news. For instance, there will be a link to the actual government document of an Executive Order within one of the stories in your triangle quickly if the news cycle of the day covers that topic. Even better, bypass the packaged news system altogether and use the Internets most powerful tool, the search engine, to find whatever is being referenced in the news. A few words, a name, an issue copied and pasted into a search box will quickly get you the actual documentation. You need to read for yourself before proceeding further into the murky world of the internet or even the broader broadcasting world of non-US 24/7 networks. Its just very hard to fool someone thats read the original source.

Get good at doing this and youll be formidable. More important, youll be more objective and able to discuss issues tolerantly with people even when your biases are not aligned because youll be engaging each other on facts and not spin.

I hope you consider trying this technique and encourage others to do so.

Continued here:
Three Steps to Take Control Back from the Media Anyone Can Do - Huffington Post

5 years after Trayvon Martin’s death, what has nation learned?: Column – USA TODAY

Benjamin Crump Published 8:47 p.m. ET Feb. 23, 2017 | Updated 13 hours ago

People demonstrate in Washington after the acquittal of George Zimmerman.(Photo: Nicholas Kamm, AFP/Getty Images)

It has been nearly five years since the story of an innocent, unarmed black teens death at the hands of a neighborhood watch volunteer challenged Americans to recognize this uncomfortable truth: It is dangerous to be black in America.

The nightly news has well documented the sad fact that its often dangerous for black citizens to have an encounter with a police officer. What made Trayvon Martin'scase remarkable is that it apparently extended the license to kill innocent, unarmed black people to other citizens. Now, as we approach the fifth year since Trayvons death, we inevitably ask ourselves what his life and death meant and where we go from here.

Related content:

POLICING THE USA: A look at race, justice, media

Don't be too quick to roll back Obama policing efforts: Column

On Feb. 26, 2012, Trayvon was targeted, pursued and shot dead by George Zimmerman in a gated neighborhood in Sanford, Fla., for the simple reason that he was black.

The newscoverage of Trayvons story was a phenomenon. For the first time in decades, a young black teens death was the top news story in the nation. Trayvons face was on every major news network, newspaper, magazine and online news site. But how many other young black men are killed every day without generating the slightest bit of notice? The unprecedented public attention and outrage generated by Trayvons death is certainly an element of his legacy.

And while Trayvons killing mighthave drawn uncommon public attention, it reflected the sadly common bias of our justice system that white-on-black crime is justified by mere suspicion. A turning point in the Zimmerman case occurred when the judge allowed testimony from a woman who said she had been burglarized six months earlier byblack suspects, an incident in no way connected with Trayvon. The admission of that testimony in effect said its a fair assumption that black people are dangerous as a group, and that white people could be justified in killing them.

Trayvons death was one in a long line of cases calling into question whether black lives matter under the law. Consider 14-year-old Emmett Till, whose white killers saw no consequence for acting on a false accusation. Consider 15-year-old Latasha Harlins, fatally shot in the back of the head in 1991 by a store owner who suspected the girl was trying to steal a bottle of juice. No justice.

Trayvons death and his killers subsequent acquittal galvanized the Black Lives Matter movement, generating many important conversations across America. Critics of the movement frequently ask, Dont you mean all lives matter? Of course, all lives should matter. But the evidence overwhelmingly suggests thatin America today, black lives dont. Raising that conversation and provoking a hard look at the racial bias that is baked into Americas justice system is another important part of Trayvons legacy, though that work is far from finished.

Attorney Benjamin Crump speaks during a news conference.(Photo: Jeff Roberson, AP)

In working toward a better America, Trayvons parents, Sybrina Fulton and Tracy Martin, rightfully deserve a tribute for their painful and tireless sharing of their story, contributing to a more conscious awareness of discrimination. Their powerful work and sacrifices have re-energized the civil rights movement.

Unfortunately, not all the outgrowths of Trayvons case have been constructive. Deadly laws such asstand your ground, which in part vindicated Trayvons killer, have sprung up across the country, metastasizing to more than 30 states. The deep pockets of the gun lobby continue to fund this kind of legislation that lets everyday citizens off the hook for the killing of innocent people such asTrayvon, sweeping their deaths under the blood-stained rug of racial injustice.

To cure what ails our nation, first we must admit the problem. Black Americans are more likely to be stopped by police, more likely to be arrested, more likely to die in an encounter with police, more likely to serve time and are oftenforced to plead guilty tocrimes they did not commit. In fact, one in threeblack men born in 2001 will end up serving time in prison, according to the Sentencing Project. That shocking fact accounts for the destruction of an extraordinary number of black families and imperils the future of the next generation of black children.

While Trayvon's death raised Americas consciousness and pierced its conscience, the progress toward racial equality and true justice has been painfully slow. Trayvons life mattered. For his death to also matter, we must change the justice equation in America to ensure that all citizens are treated fairly by police, by the courts and by the correctional system. Let's finally extendequal justice to all.

Attorney Benjamin Crump is a civil rights advocate who represents the family of Trayvon Martin and has worked on dozens of other high-profile civil rights cases.

Read or Share this story: http://usat.ly/2mdoLMy

Link:
5 years after Trayvon Martin's death, what has nation learned?: Column - USA TODAY

Hearing on Movie House Shooting Latest Test of ‘Stand Your Ground’ Law – Courthouse News Service

(CN) Three years after an argument over texting in a Florida movie theater ended in a 43-year-old mans death, the states controversial Stand Your Ground law is under scrutiny in a hearing underway in a small courthouse about an hour north of Tampa.

Prosecutors say Curtis Reeves, a retired police captain, killed Chad Oulson during an argument in the Wesley Chapel theater in January 2014.

But Reeves attorney, Dino Michaels, contends a video from that night will show Oulson attacked the older man first and the former officer acted in self-defense.

The Stand Your Ground law allows Florida residents to use deadly force to defend their lives or their property. If Pinellas-Pasco Circuit Judge Susan Barthle determines the incident meets the proper criteria, Reeves will be immune from criminal prosecution and civil action.

If not, he will be tried for second-degree murder.

For now his fate is in the hands of Barthle, who is presiding over a hearing on that very question. The hearing is supposed to continue for the next two weeks.

On January 13, 2014, Reeves and his wife arrived at a movie theater and sat behind Oulson and his wife to watch Lone Survivor.

During the previews, Oulson checked his phone, prompting Reeves to ask him to put it away, because the light was distracting him. When Oulson refused, Reeves left to contact a manager. When Reeves returned, the argument continued.

What happened next is still contested.

In his opening statement, Dino Michaels said Oulson stood over Reeves, tossed popcorn at him, and then threw another object probably his cell phone at the retired officers head.

Oulsons behavior terrified Mr. Reeves, Michaels told the court, and terrified his wife who was sitting next to him.

Reeves leaned back, took out a pistol and shot Oulson in the chest.

He acted reasonably because of his background, because of his training, because of the situation, Michaels said of his client..

Assistant State Attorney Glenn Martin painted a different picture.

Martin said Reeves instigated the argument and had non-consensual contact with Oulson three times before the younger man stood up. According to Martin, Reese had already begun pulling out his pistol after Oulson threw fluffy popcorn at him, while reportedly saying, Throw popcorn on me will you?

Was it reasonably necessary to prevent immediate great bodily harm, death or forcible felony? Martin asked the court. When we talk about stand your ground, it has to be just right.

The movie theater shooting is another flashpoint in the rocky history of Floridas Stand Your Ground law.

It first received national attention after the shooting of unarmed 17-year-old Trayvon Martin by neighborhood watch leader George Zimmerman.

Many saw the shooting as racially motivated (Martin was black; Zimmerman is Hispanic) and expressed outrage when Zimmerman was acquitted.

A 2012 study by the Tampa Bay Times found the law had been invoked more than 200 times since its inception and allowed 70 percent of those accused to walk free. Gang members and drug dealers were among those who never faced murder charges, the study said.

But pro-gun advocates like the National Rifle Association have praised the laws, which more than half of the country has enacted over the last decade.

Reeves attorney plans to focus on his credibility as a former police captain and vulnerability due to his age.

The first two witnesses, Reeves children, described a man struggling to remain active in his golden years.

Ive seen my dad push him limits to remain active, said Jennifer Shaw on the stand, describing her fathers difficulties opening a jar or picking up her child.

Reeves son, himself a police officer, had just stepped inside the theater when the shooting occurred. In his testimony, Matthew Reeves heard his fathers voice just before the sound of the gun.

He then described the wounded Oulson taking a step back and stumbling down the theater stairs. The younger Reeves attended to Oulsons wounds before a nurse appeared.

When Reeves looked up to see his father, he testified, the mans glasses were askew and his hand was pressed against the side of his head. His mother?

She was shaking, he said.

View post:
Hearing on Movie House Shooting Latest Test of 'Stand Your Ground' Law - Courthouse News Service

Black Lives Matter co-founder tackles local and national issues in Bradley speech – Peoria Journal Star

Pam Adams Journal Star education reporter @padamspam

PEORIA From Peorias distinction by an online magazine as the worst city for African-Americans, to mass incarceration and over-policing, to the legitimate white supremacists in the White House, Patrisse Cullors tackled the topics that made a three-word phrase, Black Lives Matter, take hold around the world after George Zimmerman was acquitted in 2013 for the murder of Trayvon Martin.

In that moment I witnessed a modern-day lynching.

Cullors, an artist, organizer and co-founder of Black Lives Matter, spoke at Bradley Universitys Renaissance Coliseum on Thursday. About 800 people attended the lecture, as many white people as black people. Almost as many appeared older than 30 as younger. Student groups came from nearby schools, including Illinois State University, Monmouth College, Illinois Central College and area high schools.

Cullors linked earlier Black Lives Matter protests to the more recent Womens March and widespread protests at airports after President Donald Trump issued an executive order restricting travel from seven predominantly Muslim countries.

She urged her audience to resist, organize and build power, whether it involved the Trump administration or local issues on their campuses or their cities. The statistics that plague this city can shift.

The countrys history of inequality and injustice makes it hard for people to imagine how the country can be, she said.

How do we have a conversation that reimagines a country without incarceration? she asked. Public safety is access to food. Public safety is access to housing. Public safety is basic human rights.

Cullors no longer takes questions on her views on the phrase All Lives Matter. Find the responses on Black Twitter or other social media outlets, she said. But she is concerned about efforts to depict Black Lives Matter as a hate group.

The unfortunate reality of white racism is, its a deep fear of black people standing up for themselves, she said. Its simply 'our lives matter.'

Calling it a hate group is coded language that really means black lives don't matter, she added.

Pam Adams can be reached at 686-3245 or padams@pjstar.com. Follow her on Twitter @padamspam.

Read the original post:
Black Lives Matter co-founder tackles local and national issues in Bradley speech - Peoria Journal Star

Iowa panel OKs gun bill with stand-your-ground provision – The News Tribune


TheBlaze.com
Iowa panel OKs gun bill with stand-your-ground provision
The News Tribune
The 17-year-old was shot and killed by George Zimmerman, a neighborhood watch volunteer. Zimmerman ultimately didn't use the state's stand-your-ground law as defense though its consideration garnered attention. Zimmerman was later acquitted of ...
Iowa gun bill seeks 'stand-your-ground' lawQuad City Times

all 99 news articles »

More:
Iowa panel OKs gun bill with stand-your-ground provision - The News Tribune