Media Search:



Donald Trump’s blame the liberals talk belongs to a long right-wing … – Salon

Donald Trump is a professional white victimologist. The examples are legion. Trump never takes responsibility for his actions and appears to believe in numerous fictions: News media outlets are conspiring against him, Barack Obama is trying to sabotage his presidency, the military and not the commander in chief is to blame for the recent botched raid that killed a Navy commando, the women who accused Trumpof sexual assault are all lying, millions of illegal votes were cast against him, and the tens of millions of people who have protested his regime are all paid operatives.

Donald Trump also refuses to take responsibility for the nationwide wave of hate crimes against Muslims, Jews and people of color that his rhetoric and agenda have inspired.

Trumps voters are also white victimologists. Despite the fact that white Americans have more (unearned) political, social and economic power than members of any other group in the country, public opinion and other research has shown that Trumps white voters believe they are oppressed and that nonwhites receive more opportunities. (Trumps voters and Republicans en masse also believe that men, not women, are victims of sexism in America.) White victimology is also present in the deranged belief that racism against white people is as big a problem, if not bigger, than racism against African-Americans and other people of color. White conservatives are also more likely to hold such beliefs than other members of the American public.

In all, deploying white victimology is one of Donald Trumps favorite tactics, and it has a long association withthe conservative movement. Trump wielded white victimology to great effect in order to win the Electoral College vote. He shows no sign of abandoning the politics of white victimology while president.

As reported by the New York Daily News on Tuesday, when Trump discussed the terrorist threats and vandalism that have recently targeted the Jewish community, he seemed to channel a conspiracy theory that the master Nazi propagandist Joseph Goebbels would have approved of:

President Trump appeared to suggest Tuesday that thewave of bomb threats against Jewish community centers across the U.S.could be coming from within the Jewish community itself, according to a Pennsylvania state lawmaker present for the comments.

Pennsylvania Attorney General Josh Shapiro, who was part of a group of state attorneys general meeting with Trump at the White House Tuesday, relayed Trumps comments about the bomb threatsto Buzzfeed News, explaining that the commander-in-chief seemed to indicate he felt some of the threats were being made from the inside, as part of a potential effort to make others look bad.

White supremacists hear echoes in Donald Trumps suggestion that Jews and others are staging these hate crimes, and have celebrated online how their glorious leader is now following their lead.

This is not the first time that Donald Trump has parroted anti-Semitic themes. He did so repeatedly during last yearspresidential election. Given that some of Trumps most senior advisers have links to white nationalism, it would seem that The Protocols of the Elders of Zion is now required reading in the White House. (Some of Trumps close advisers are also Jewish, including Stephen Miller and Trumps son-in-law Jared Kushner, which admittedly clouds the picture.)

Likewise, Trumps belief that liberals and Democrats are conspiring against him (and the Republican Party) is part of a broader right-wing obsession with false flag operations and related conspiracy theories. There are many ugly examples of this that can be found among conservatives, going back decades.In 1963, William F. Buckleys magazine, the National Review, suggested that the Birmingham church bombing that killed four black girls was most likely the work of a crazed negro.

White victimology also distorts reality by creating a fantasy whereby it is not conservatives who are the real racists but rather liberals and progressives. This trope is common across the right-wing news entertainment echo chamber. It also has standard talking points, which are easily disproved. Consider the following examples:

1. The Ku Klux Klan is a Democratic organization.

Its true that the Ku Klux Klan was founded by Southern Democrats in the aftermath of the Civil War. That Jim Crow, segregationist wing of the Democratic Party has now been fully absorbed by the Republicans. Moreover, since the civil rights movement, Klan activity in much of the Southis best understood as part of white backlash against the Democratic Party and in support of the Republican Party. In its current form, the Klan is a right-wing terrorist organization that supports Republican candidates, including Donald Trump.

2. Black Lives Matter is a hate group, much like the Klan.

Black Lives Matter is a civil rights organization and activist movement that seeks to end police brutality against African-Americans and other people. Black Lives Matter also supports public policies that respect and nurture the full humanity and dignity of all people, regardless of their skin color. Black Lives Matter does not endorse violence. It has not hurt or killed anyone. By comparison, the Ku Klux Klan and related white right-wing terrorist organizations, according toestimates, have killed at least 50,000 African-Americansfrom the end of the Civil War through the decline of the Klan as a national force in the latter part of the 20th century.

3. Progressives have always been racist against people of color.

This claim is ahistorical. White supremacy has been a fixture of American society from before the founding of the republic through to the present. The progressive reform movement of the late-19th and early-20th centuries was multifaceted and complex. Like other political movements, it reflected the tensions and social norms of its era. As such, many if not most of its reform organizations were racially segregated. That did not stop African-Americans and other people of color from working toward many of the same goals (womens rights, temperance, public health, public education and improved public hygiene).

Many Northern white progressives were either indifferent to or supported Jim and Jane Crow, biological racism and eugenics. Most Southern white progressives and other reformers explicitly embraced and supported white supremacy. But to draw a clear line from the progressive movement of the late-19th and early-20th century to the post-civil rights era is intellectually dishonest and historically inaccurate. On questions of the color line, racial progress, civil rights and freedom, conservatives have more in common with the racist and white supremacist social order of the past than do forward-thinking progressives and liberals who fought to tear down that system.

4. Blacks and other minorities are taking jobs and other opportunities away from whites through programs such as affirmative action.

Affirmative action programs have never denied white people jobs or other opportunities. Affirmative action programs to the degree they still existhave simply encouraged employers to broaden their job recruitment and hiring practices to include people who arent white men. Nonwhites continue toface considerable racial discrimination in hiring and promotions. Economists and other social scientists have repeatedly shown that it is white women, not people of color, who benefit the most from affirmative action programs.

On the college and university level, it is the children of alumni as well as donors who receive the most preferential treatment in admissions. This is a de facto advantage for white people over members of other groups. Whites are the largest beneficiaries of scholarships and similar programs as well. This also reproduces inequality because of the high levels of racial and economical segregation in Americas public and private schools.

Donald Trump and the broader right-wing movements white victimology and conspiracy-theory narratives have so much traction because conservatives have been trained and conditioned by their media and other leaders to believe them. This is historian and political scientist Richard Hofstadters much-referenced paranoid style in action:

But the modern right wing, as Daniel Bell has put it, feels dispossessed: America has been largely taken away from them and their kind, though they are determined to try to repossess it and to prevent the final destructive act of subversion. The old American virtues have already been eaten away by cosmopolitans and intellectuals; the old competitive capitalism has been gradually undermined by socialistic and communistic schemers; the old national security and independence have been destroyed by treasonous plots, having as their most powerful agents not merely outsiders and foreigners as of old but major statesmen who are at the very centers of American power. Their predecessors had discovered conspiracies; the modern radical right finds conspiracy to be betrayal from on high.

Important changes may also be traced to the effects of the mass media. The villains of the modern right are much more vivid than those of their paranoid predecessors, much better known to the public; the literature of the paranoid style is by the same token richer and more circumstantial in personal description and personal invective.

The impact of this dynamic is revealed inthe wayAmerican conservatives exist in an alternate social and political world that operates outside empirical reality on a broad range of issues from science to the economy. Contemporary conservatism especially as manifest in the ascendancy of Trumps fascist and authoritarian movement is a type of religion (Hofstadters fundamentalist mind) that runson faith, a belief that cannot be proved by rational, empirical or scientific means.

This dynamic is enabled by right-wing media outlets that intentionally and quite effectively circulate disinformation and lies to viewers. With the acceptance of Fox News as a mainstream source of news information (media scholars have shown its viewers are among the least informedand that watching the network makes people less knowledgeable) and withTrumps access to conspiracy-minded websites such as Infowars and Breitbart, the presidentnow controls his own unofficial state media. Trump will use this propaganda machine to disseminate his lies and further undermine the mainstream news media.

Ultimately, Donald Trump and the Republican Partys embrace of white victimology and conspiracy theories is but one more front in a long war waged against the truth and empirical reality.

As has been repeatedly shown by social scientists, conservatives and Republicans are more likely than liberals and Democrats to be racist, hold negative attitudes toward blacks and other people of color and exhibit what is known as old-fashioned racism and white supremacist views. Conservatism and racism have effectively become one and the same thing in America. Trumps election puts an exclamation point onthat.

Scholar and activist W. E. B. Du Bois once observed that the problem of the twentieth century is the problem of the color-line. It would seem that he is still right, well into the next century just not in a way that many of us expected.

Original post:
Donald Trump's blame the liberals talk belongs to a long right-wing ... - Salon

Support for Wynne Liberals crumbling: Poll – Toronto Sun


Toronto Sun
Support for Wynne Liberals crumbling: Poll
Toronto Sun
Support for Ontario's Liberals is crumbling in the former suburban areas of Toronto, according to a Mainstreet Research poll. While the provincial Liberals command a 42% lead among decided and leaning voters in Toronto, support for them outside the ...
NDP edging BC Liberals slightly in new polliNews880.com

all 3 news articles »

Read more from the original source:
Support for Wynne Liberals crumbling: Poll - Toronto Sun

Abortion funding: Canada’s Liberals will help fill global gap from Trump’s ban – CBC.ca

The federal government is pledging up to $20 million to fund sexual health and family planninginitiativesas part of an international campaign to fill a gap created by President Donald Trump's decision to ban U.S. funding for abortion-related projects.

The money will go to five organizations, including the International Planned Parenthood Federation, and be spent in the coming 12 months.

In a release, the government says the money will go towards contraceptives, family planning and comprehensive sexuality education, and access to post-abortion care.

International Development Minister Marie-Claude Bibeau said in a statement that all women have the right to choose whether and when they want to have children, and how many.

A major aid agency said it would welcome any financial help Canada can provide, but warned that if the country is really serious about helping poor women in the developing world, it must increase the overall amount it spends on international aid in the upcoming federal budget.

Lauren Ravon, Oxfam's Canadian director of policy and campaigns, says Canada's decision to take part in Thursday's pledging conference in Brussels known as "She Decides" is a welcome effort.

Bibeau represented Canada at the meeting, where some 50 countries are trying to raise $600 million to fill the shortfall caused by Trump's decision.

One of Trump's first acts as president was to bring back a policy withholding hundreds of millions of dollars per year from groups that perform abortions or provide advice about the procedure.

The ban has been instituted by successive Republican administrations dating back to the Ronald Reagan era in 1984, only to be rolled back by successive Democratic presidents since then.

Trump's order reversed Barack Obama's 2009 decision to restore funding.

The Trudeau government made a similar decision after winning power in 2015 by allowing funding for family planning in projects related to the maternal newborn child health, the signature aid project of the previous Harper government.

The Conservatives also banned funding to abortion-related services, but the Trudeau government lifted that ban while deciding to carry forward with the aid initiative.

The Liberals have not committed to raising Canada's overall aid budget, which stands at less than 0.3 per cent of gross national income. That's significantly less than the 0.7 per cent target that the United Nations has set.

Sharman Stone (left), Australia's ambassador for women and girls, speaks with Afghanistan's minister for women's affairs Alhaj Delbar Nazari at the "She Decides" family planning conference in Brussels Thursday. (Virginia Mayo/Associated Press)

Bibeau and Prime Minister Justin Trudeau have said it is unlikely Canada can come up with a plan to meet that target because it would involve a massive infusion of new funds into the aid budget, as much as $10 billion.

Ravon said organizations such as Oxfam want to see an overall increase in Canada's aid budget.

"Whatever announcement Minister Bibeau makes is great; there is such a shortfall in funding," she said in an interview. "(But) we're seeing that Canada's aid budget is actually at an almost all-time low.

"One-off announcements are important. But we'd really like to see a major increase in the federal budget for development assistance."

The Liberals are expected to release their latest budget in the coming weeks. Bibeau has overseen the completion of a major review of Canada's development strategy, but has not released it.

Supporting women and girls "will be at the heart" of the new aid strategy, says a summary on her department's website. The government says it held 300 consultations in 65 countries, involving 15,000 people.

Two of the main messages it received was to "apply a feminist lens" to development and raise overall aid spending to 0.7 per cent of gross national income.

Shaughn McArthur, CARE Canada's advocacy and government relations adviser, said agencies such as his are applauding the government's focus on women and girls in the upcoming development review.

"This government has come out very strongly in saying we want to support women and girls," said McArthur.

"And obviously there needs to be a dollar figure associated to that."

Read more here:
Abortion funding: Canada's Liberals will help fill global gap from Trump's ban - CBC.ca

Key Republicans Ask Jeff Sessions to Recuse Himself in Russia Case – New York Times


NBCNews.com
Key Republicans Ask Jeff Sessions to Recuse Himself in Russia Case
New York Times
WASHINGTON Congressional Republicans began breaking ranks on Thursday to join Democrats in demanding that Attorney General Jeff Sessions recuse himself from overseeing an investigation into contacts between the Trump campaign and the ...
Republicans turn up heat on SessionsCNN
Democrats Demand Attorney General Jeff Sessions Resign Over Russian MeetingsNBCNews.com
White House defends Sessions as Dems seek resignation over Russia revelationFox News
Reuters -AL.com -TheBlaze.com -Washington Post
all 1,480 news articles »

See the rest here:
Key Republicans Ask Jeff Sessions to Recuse Himself in Russia Case - New York Times

Celebrity Democrats Fuck Off – Deadspin

The face of populism: Getty

We have just witnessed the incredible spectacle of a vile right-wing celebrity being elected President of the United States. There is a right lessonand a wrong one!for Democrats to take from this.

The Democratic party is in the process of deciding whether it will be the primary home of The Resistance, or its normal bumbling, triangulating mess. Hard choice! On one hand, there are millions and millions of Americans angry at our incipient slide into white nationalism and looking for a place to direct their newfound political energy; on the other hand, when you talk to Bill Clinton, he really makes you feel like youre the only in the whole room.

There are a million small, technical things that establishment Democrats can, if they so choose, blame their election loss on: the media, James Comey, a weak ground game in Midwestern states, etcetera. This impulse to attribute the loss to small things that can be changed relatively easy is a powerful one, because it absolves the party as a whole from scrutiny. In this scenario, its not that the Democratic party is moribund and out of touch and the object of legitimate scorn from many voters whose lives have not improved for decades; its just that [MINOR TACTICAL THING].

If this is ultimately the lesson the party takes from this election, it is a missed opportunity. There is a reason why two anti-establishment outsiders, Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders, did far better than expected: because people are mad that our political system is broken. We have a democracy that has been proven to operate like an oligarchy, favoring the interests of wealthy and powerfuland, consequently, we have a dying middle class and decades of rising inequality. Yes, the policies of the Republicans are to blame for a good deal of this. But the Democrats are supposed to be the party that stopped all this from happening. They failed. In many instances, they were complicit. There is no arguing with the fact that the establishment is what got us to where we are today. That is why the Democrats must change. And that change must be a leftward push towards economic equality, social equality, and, most importantly, towards building a democracy that functions in the way that democracies shouldby distributing power to everyone, not letting it be controlled by the few.

This is what the Democratic party should have taken away from their devastating election loss. But of course, there is no guarantee that they did. If the Democrats are able to blame their loss on small, controllable tactical errors, they are then free to conclude that their path to victory lies in more of the same. This mindstatewhich allows the establishment to just continue doing what it doeswas powerful enough to defeat Keith Ellisons bid to lead the DNC. The establishment did not get to where they are by accident.

Nothing embodies this Democratic tendency to run away from left wing populism at top speed better than its worshipful embrace of political celebrity. We are already hearing the terrifying whispers. Chelsea Clinton may run for office (perhaps against Caroline Kennedy?). Perhaps Hillary Clinton will make a run for New York City mayor. Andrew Cuomo is exploring a 2020 presidential bid. John Kerry wont rule out another run, either. And hey, political celebs not big enough for you? Maybe the Democrats will run Mark Cuban! Or George Clooney! Or Oprah!!!

Do you know why so many people are unenthusiastic about the Democratic party? Because the Democrats dont fucking do what theyre supposed to do. They are supposed to be the party of the oppressed. They are supposed to fight for the little guy. They are supposed to represent the poor, and the downtrodden, and the marginalized. Instead, they fawn over political dynasties and search madly for our own rich and famous people to counteract the rich and famous people of the other side. They are supposed to be opening doors for people who have never had the chance to be rich, or famous; instead, they are busy creating their own team of celebrities and billionairesbut ours are nice.

That is what the other side does. We are actually against that, you see. We are not supposed to copying that.

Bernie Sanders and Pope Francis were both shocks to their respective institutions, because they both at least tried to make those institutions act in accordance with their stated values. But it is hard to make the church give up its golden chalices, and it is hard to make the Democrats give up the Clintons and the Kennedys. Speaking as one of the (majority of) Americans who would not care to see our country slide into fascism, I would like to urge the Democratic establishment to think about why you are where you are. Not to meet Oprah, nor to be introduced to the infinite network of insider connections. You are there to help people who need help.

If necessary, we can spend the next four years prying the hands of celebrity Democrats off of the levers of power, but thats not the most efficient use of time. It would be better for everyone if they politely wrote the checks and fucked off. Clintonistas and zillionaire politico-tourists and Hollywood stars: be good soldiers, and hold the door open for people who actually care about issues on your way out.

Continue reading here:
Celebrity Democrats Fuck Off - Deadspin