Media Search:



Howard Stern, Hillary Clinton And Martin Scorsese Highlight The Great Luxury Of Time – Forbes

Actor Al Pacino, from left, director Martin Scorsese and actor Robert De Niro pose for photographers ... [+] upon arrival at the premiere of the film 'The Irishman' as part of the London Film Festival, in central London, Sunday, Oct. 13, 2019. (Photo by Joel C Ryan/Invision/AP)

Weve been hearing about the sad shrinking of our collective attention spans for decades. In the 1980s MTV remember when the M meant music? shaped a generation of media habits with rapid-fire music video cuts, which in turn formed the foundation of movie musicals such as Flashdance and Footloose. By the early 1990s we had a Comedy Central show called Short Attention Span Theater. Jeffrey Katzenberg raised over a billion dollars for Quibi (quick bites) with a pitch focused on short mobile video segments. Our entire social media infrastructure is based on the quick dopamine hit from the latest community acknowledgement of our shared GIFs and bon mots. And oh yeah, YouTube.

And yet. As we head into the end of the year holidays, with so many media options in front of us, it was a pleasure to luxuriate in a few recent offerings that highlight the powerful impact of work that takes it time. And maybe theres even a business case for it.

Do you know the most insightful, thoughtful, human interview that I have heard from an American political figure in the last year? Hillary Clintons sit down with Howard Stern. Yes, shes out shilling a book The Book of Gutsy Women that she wrote with Chelsea. But this was no superficial happy to be here Howard drive-by appearance. It unfolded not in a 7- minute segment surrounded by reports on Trumps latest tweet or a holiday cooking segment, but over the course of two hours and on the radio (OK, it was satellite radio, but still).

Stern may self-deprecatingly call himself a guy who tells penis jokes for a living but it is no surprise to faithful listeners to his show that he is an extraordinarily engaging, empathetic interviewer. The Clinton interview was the opposite of rushed either from the questioner or the interviewee. There was time for Stern to use pointed follow-up questions that arose from good old-fashioned listening to the prior answer. And in the process, a woman who all-too-often has come across in public life as pre-programmed and cautious to a fault displayed a gift for humor, warmth, intelligence and historical perspective that has rarely if ever been displayed through more conventional short-burst media outlets. Sometimes less isnt more its just less.

Although he probably wouldnt expect to be mentioned in the same breath as Howard Stern, Martin Scorseses latest film, The Irishman, is another shining example of the luxury of time in media, in this case in service of telling a big story.

There arent too many entertainment products that will even attempt never mind deserve 3 hours and 29 minutes of your time, but The Irishman does. Its scope encompasses American political history in the middle of the 20th century, the labor movement, the criminal justice system, the battle for acceptance by immigrants and the good, bad and ugly of a host of powerful human emotions. It provides space for extraordinary performances from some of our greatest actors from Robert DeNiro to Al Pacino to Joe Pesci. When DeNiros working stiff character asks Pescis wise guy character his name, and gets no response, the silence feels longer than anything I can recall outside of a play by Samuel Becket. It has a respect for its audience that is unmistakable.

Stern and Scorsese theres that magical combination again are of course joined by other recent superb examples of not only a longer time-frame for the work but a more luxurious pace. If youve watched the Golden Globe and Emmy winning series The Crown again thanks to Netflix - you see a series with extraordinary patience in telling its story and looking inside the psyches of its famous royal family and the historical figures that surround them. The public has also embraced Knives Out, which sprinkles its classic whodunit with joys such as the languorous speechifying of Daniel Craig, the detective whose job is to solve the mystery.

Are these examples of the exceptions that prove the short attention span rule? Is there actually a business in such lengthy work?

The digital media world is driven by what is sometimes called the attention economy for the value placed on keeping the consumer engaged on your platform. After the completion of the AT&T-Time Warner merger, the new Warner Media CEO John Stankey, noted that that in a Netflix-dominated streaming marketplace, the future for HBO depended upon measuring their growth in not hours a week, and its not hours a month. We need hours a day.

More hours per day when youre in traditional broadcast and cable media means more eyeballs watching and more advertising revenues. Of course neither Netflix or HBO Max are dependent (at least for now) on advertising. Nonetheless, the fight for quality time as well as quantity time with the consumer is if anything more important when youre depending upon the consumer ponying up their own money.

The streaming world whether you are talking audio or video, podcasting or live streaming is fighting an opportunity cost game, and its the cost of the consumers time and money. If the consumer isnt spending their time with me, theyre likely spending it with a competitor and over time my value may diminish for a consumer that is paying growing subscription fees out of their own pocket. So maybe content that demands greater rather than lesser attention, and more rather than less time, is worthy of the greatest investment in production, acquisition and marketing. Sounds pretty good to me. I bet the strange bedfellows Howard and Marty - not to mention Hillary - might even agree on that.

Go here to read the rest:
Howard Stern, Hillary Clinton And Martin Scorsese Highlight The Great Luxury Of Time - Forbes

Hillary Clinton: ‘Impeachment is the only remedy’ for Trump’s attempt to ‘cheat in the next election’ – Washington Examiner

Failed 2016 presidential candidate Hillary Clinton argued that impeaching President Trump is the only way to defend the country's democracy.

Clinton, who was secretary of state under the Obama administration, argued on Wednesday that the president "abused his powers" and did so in order "to cheat in the next election." She also accused the president of obstructing Congress in an effort to "to cover it up," before then declaring, "Impeachment is the only remedy."

Her tweet came as members of the House of Representatives are speaking on the floor ahead of the impeachment vote. The chamber is weighing two articles of impeachment against Trump: one for abuse of power and the other for obstruction of Congress. The House is expected to impeach the president on a near party-line vote, but it's just as likely that the Republican-controlled Senate will vote to acquit him during a trial next year.

Should it come to fruition, Trump will become just the third president in U.S. history to be impeached, following former Presidents Andrew Johnson and Bill Clinton. Neither were convicted in the Senate, however, and both served the remainder of their terms in office.

Clinton's comments are reiterations of previous statements she has made on the matter. Earlier this month, she urged people to "make sure your family and friends see the evidence for themselves," and added that "Americans deserve free and fair elections," while noting, "He must be held accountable."

See more here:
Hillary Clinton: 'Impeachment is the only remedy' for Trump's attempt to 'cheat in the next election' - Washington Examiner

Did Pelosi Approve $4.8 Million in ‘Impeachment Consulting Fees’ to the Clinton Foundation? – Snopes.com

On Nov. 23, 2019, the Daily World Update website published an article positing that House Speaker Nancy Pelosi had approved $4.8 million to be paid to the Clinton Foundation, a charity run by former President Bill and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, for impeachment consulting fees:

Nancy Pelosi Approves $4.8 Million In Impeachment Consulting Fees To Clinton Foundation

As if the impeachment of President Trump werent already silly enough, reports from our DC insiders indicate that theres one organization raking in a ton of cash from the operation: The Clinton Foundation. In department memos not released to the public, Nancy Pelosi is said to have more or less agreed to the consulting fees to the fake charity in the amount of nearly $5 million, because they have specific knowledge of this area.

This item was not a factual recounting of real-life events. The article originated with a website that describes its output as being humorous or satirical in nature, as follows:

Everything on this website is fiction. It is not a lie and it is not fake news because it is not real. If you believe that it is real, you should have your head examined. Any similarities between this sites pure fantasy and actual people, places, and events are purely coincidental and all images should be considered altered and satirical. See above if youre still having an issue with that satire thing.

The article was a play on impeachment proceedings then underway against President Donald Trump, as well as the fact that former President Clinton had been impeached by the U.S. House of Representatives in 1998. Trump was similarly impeached by the House on Dec. 18, 2019.

For background, here is why we sometimes write about satire/humor.

Excerpt from:
Did Pelosi Approve $4.8 Million in 'Impeachment Consulting Fees' to the Clinton Foundation? - Snopes.com

The One That Got Away – Will Hillary Run? – City Watch

More specifically, do those Democratswho voted for Donald Trump, or the Green Partys Jill Stein, in 2016 wish now they had voted for Clinton?

The answer to this question is no doubt at the heart of persistent rumors that former Secretary of State and 2008/2016 also-ran Hillary Clinton is considering jumping into the race for the Democratic nomination once again.

Clinton has beendropping hints for weeks, albeit possibly in an effort to sell more of her recently published book Gutsy Women. But a new poll published this week shows thatHillary Clinton would be leading the Democratic field, if she were in it.

Clinton herself has more than a few reasons to consider a rematch against Donald Trump, not least of which is the way her stunning defeat still so obviously rankles.

Clinton has blamed her loss on everything from Russian interference- evengoing so far as to call Jill Stein a Russian asset -- to the Electoral College -- pointing out that she actually won by popular vote.

Her detractors, of which there have been no shortage in the Democratic Party since Clintons crushing defeat at the hands of a political non-entity like Donald Trump, arent as reticent on the subject of Clintons deficiencies.

They are quick to point out several campaign mistakes that helped doom her hopes at achieving the White House.

One such mistake that bears repeating was Clintons disastrous decision to classify potential Trump voters as a basket of deplorables. This statement would go on to haunt Clinton throughout the campaign and beyond.

Clinton critics are also eager to point out, in answer to her grousing about the Electoral College, that she should have run a smarter race.

It is certainly possible that had the Clinton campaign spent less time convincing voters who were already convinced in Blue states and more time convincing working-class voters on the fence in the Rust Belt, Hillary Clinton might be President today.

Then again, she might not be.

Because in addition to voting Democrats who broke ranks in 2016 to express their dissatisfaction with the Democratic Party and/or the status quo by rage-voting for Donald Trump, many Democratic voters stayed home in 2016.

Some did so out of disappointment over Bernie Sanders failing to cinch the nomination. Many Berners felt the DNC unfairly rigged its selection process to favor of its chosen nominee -- Hillary Clinton.

Other Democrats sat out the last election and failed to support the partys chosen nominee of Hillary Clinton for other reasons, many having to do with Clinton herself.Long before #MeToo dragged serial predators like Harvey Weinstein, Bill Cosby and Jeffery Epstein kicking and screaming out into the open, there was Bill Clinton.

The former President was problematic long before problematic became a buzzword. As agent provocateur, Pulitzer Prize winner, and son of a famous predator himself, Ronan Farrow has pointed out recently;there are credible accusations of rape against Bill Clinton.

Farrow also pointed out that Bill Clintons reputation was long overdue for reexamination.

And indeed, perhaps former President Clintons most infamous sexual exploitation and conquest played out in the public sphere. There is no question that Clintons inappropriate sexual relationship with a young White House intern crossed the line of mere impropriety into exploitation and abuse.

It is certainly possible that Bill Clinton has become too radioactive in the post-#MeToo era to be of any help at all to Hillary Clinton on the campaign trail. He would likely prove a hinderance as questions about his infidelities and misconduct with other women have long plagued Hillary Clinton.

In fact, it is the role Hilary Clinton herself played in helping keep Bill Clintons numerous accusers silent that would likely haunt her the most in a knock-down, drag out campaign fight against Donald Trump.

It is possible that, in the balance, the shortcomings of Hillary Clinton will prove inadequate to dissuade her from running. Among the many temptations to run for president again, thecurrent state of the Democratic field of Presidential contenders must be the greatest.

People have real questions about Joe Biden, and his son Hunters business dealings in the Ukraine and elsewhere are only the tip of the iceberg. Underneath questions of Isnt there anyone else? are the real concerns of voting Democrats.

Like former President Barack Obama, theyworry that Joe Biden simply isnt up to this challenge; theyworry that Biden will embarrass himself.

Mayor Pete Buttigieg has his eye on the middle ground soon to be vacated by Joe Biden, but Buttigiegs campaign has more than a few problems of its own.Pete Buttigieg is no Barack Obama. His support in the African American community is virtually non-existent and a series of sloppy mistakes havent made inroads look any more likely.

Worse still,Buttigieg plans to tax the Middle Class. Which, especially considering therecent economic upsurge most American Middle Class families are experiencing, is likely to be a deal-breaker.

The cool kids of the Democratic Partyhave completely turned on Sen. Elizabeth Warren, who apparently is still too much a Republican at heart for their tastes. The Democratic Socialists of America may be in full-throated support of Sen. Bernie Sanders, but in addition to suffering some recent serious health problems, the Sanders campaign is now a presidential campaign in name only.

Democratic mandarin and former President Barack Obama, massive Democratic coalition builder that he is, hasnt endorsed any presidential candidate currently in the race. Not his former Vice President Joe Biden, not even his protege Deval Patrick.

But Obama has come out swingingagainstsomeone. One person, in particular:Sen. Bernie Sanders.

Obama haspromised to actively campaign against Sanders, and considering the strength and level of support enjoyed by Barack Obama in the African American community, this is a death knell to any Democratic campaign.

All this must look very appealing to Hilary Clinton, who must see the upheaval as proof positive that she could enter the race on top and unite the warring factions.

Because meanwhile, impeachment is helping Donald Trump, and helping him where it hurts Democrats most.

Things are looking up for President Trump.

In thecrucial battleground states Democrats desperately need to carry in 2020, impeachment pollingshows it is support for the President,not support for Democratic efforts to remove him, that is gaining ground with voters.

Impeachment is also hitting Democrats where it counts: At the bank.

The Trump campaign is raising campaign cash hand over fist and has been since the moment House Democrats announced their latest impeachment gambit. Worse still, the Trump campaign isusingthat money to strategically run ads against Democrats in swing districts specifically condemning Democratic impeachment efforts.

This one-two punch may be all it takes to not only put Donald Trump back in the White House in 2020, but also cost House Speaker Nancy Pelosi her majority in the House.

That is a scenario Democrats must prevent at any cost.

Even if that means giving Hillary Clinton another shot at defeating Donald Trump in 2020.

(contributing writer, Brooke Bell)

(Munr Kazmir is a contributing writer on Medium. Contributing writer is Brooke Bell.) Photo:Gage Skidmore. Prepped for CityWatch by Linda Abrams.

Continue reading here:
The One That Got Away - Will Hillary Run? - City Watch

Judicial Watch to attend hearing in federal court amid ongoing discovery into Hillary Clinton email scandal – One America News Network

File Former U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is pictured. (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster)

Judicial Watch plans to attend a hearing in federal court, which will decide the direction of their Hillary Clinton discovery plan. On Thursday, U.S. District Judge Royce Lamberth will consider whether Judicial Watch will be allowed to question Hillary Clinton and her top aides under oath about Benghazi as well as her emails.

The government watchdog group will also be asking the courts permission to subpoena Google in order to gain access to the private account allegedly used by Clinton and her aides. The president of Judicial Watch, Tom Fitton, claims they are pursuing newly discovered evidence in the case.

Judicial Watch hopes the hearing will allow the conservative activist group to uncover substantial information concerning Clintons deleted emails and mishandled procedures.

Read more:
Judicial Watch to attend hearing in federal court amid ongoing discovery into Hillary Clinton email scandal - One America News Network