Mediaboss Marketing

This Saturday marks the seventh anniversary of the Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting in Newtown, Connecticut. In Eugene, community members will hold a remembrance vigil and peace rally for issues impacting youth.

The names and biographies of 20 children and six staff members who were murdered in the 2012 Sandy Hook shooting will be read during the vigil.

The event will be held by Peace For Our Children, a group founded by Pastor Fred Lydum with Asbury United Methodist Church, and Jan Osoinach Smith. Smith said it is important to remind the public of these incidences so we dont see more victims.

We see incidences of gun violence almost on a daily basis in our country, said Smith. And people say, Oh, we're so sad. We're sending you our prayers. We're so sorry for your loss. But nothing is changed to prevent further acts of violence.

The vigil will also honor the following victims and survivors of recent acts of violence in Oregon.

Five Violent Incidences of Oregon in Recent History:

Smith said the large amount of gun violence doesnt have to happen.

If we can change our culture and we can decide we're not willing to accept this as the reality of today and tomorrowwe [can] vote [against] people who make these rules and laws and make these decisions, said Smith.

Although the event focuses on gun violence, it will also will address social issues that will impact the next generation.

It's our choice how we're going to leave this planet for the next generation and if we continue to live the way we're living right now, then the planet is not going to be livable for very much longer, said Smith.

After the vigil, government officials and local activists will give speeches to promote gun safety, immigration reform, and climate justice. Speakers include Mayor Lucy Vinis of Eugene, Oregon Labor Commissioner Val Hoyle, Oregon State Senator James Manning, Patty Hine from 350 Eugene, and Lex Worden with Sunrise Eugene.

Smith said if the country truly cares about freedom and human rights, people need to express these concerns to their lawmakers.

We don't want children to be treated like criminals when they come across the American border, said Smith. They're fleeing war-torn countries and drug cartels. They're coming here because their lives are in danger in their countries and we're treating them as criminals when we've all come here from an immigrant past.

The goal of the rally is to draw attention to issues not just in the United States, but worldwide.

We already have a lot of species of plants and animals that have gone extinct or on the brink of becoming extinct, and if we don't do things to protect these living plants and animals, then the world is going to change in a way that is not for the better, said Smith.

Smith said people need to take action if they want a peaceful and law-abiding society.

Theyre big goals, but if we just sit back and say, We can't do anything, then nothing's going to change, said Smith.

The rally will be held Saturday at noon at the Wayne Morse Free Speech Plaza.

Visit link:
Remembrance Vigil and Peace Rally for Sandy Hook Victims and Youth Issues - KLCC FM Public Radio

On December 9, a Saudi national opened fire at a naval air station in Pensacola, Florida, killing three people and injuring eight others. The shooter, Mohammed Saeed Alshamrani, was in the United States as part of a military program that allows some foreign military members to train inside the United States.

Just prior to the attacks, Alshamrani wrote on Twitter that he hated Americans for committing crimes not only against Muslims but also humanity. He also blasted Washington for supporting the State of Israel.

While the case is currently being treated as an act of terrorism, the FBI has yet to officially label it as such. We are looking very hard at uncovering his motive and I would ask for patience so we can get this right, said Rachel Rojas, who is the special agent in charge of the case.

While the FBI is exercisingcaution, mass-immigration proponent and self-proclaimed elitist, AlexNowrasteh, director of Immigration Studies at the Cato Institute, wantsAmericans to believe that this horrific attack is no reason for even mildconcern.

On the day of the shooting, Nowrasteh wrote a blog suggesting that this incident doesnt make a case for stricter immigration measures. In the blog, he promotes a recent study of his that called acts of terrorism in the United States committed by foreign-born individuals a manageable threat given the huge economic benefits of immigration and the relatively smaller costs of terrorism.

Thats right, when three Americansare murdered and eight others wounded, Nowrasteh wants us to remember that itssimply a relatively small cost that should not factor into discussions regardingimmigration reform.

Besides the tone-deaf timing and appallinginsensitivity, his blog and study are fatally flawed as well. In the report,Nowrasteh does several things to make the threat of terrorism look smaller thanit actually is:

The about 1 in 4 million per yearnumber that Nowrasteh pushes is the purported likelihood that a person iskilled in the U.S. by a foreign-born terrorist in a particular year. This isproblematic because it only considers a very limited period of time, not apersons entire life. The lifetime probability that a person might be killed,based on Nowrastehs figures, is actually closer to about 1 in 50,000. Thatnumber is considerably more alarming.

Furthermore, Nowrastehs figuresdont include those who die from conditions developed later in life as a resultof a foreign-born terrorist attack, such as cancer and chronic respiratoryconditions stemming from exposure to toxic rubble and ash produced on 9/11.

According to Dr. Michael Caine, Medical Director of the World Trade Center Health Program at Mount Sinai Hospital, since the attacks, more than 2,000 deaths have been attributed to 9/11 illnesses. These people should be considered victims of terrorism. Nowrasteh also excludes the thousands who suffer non-fatal injuries during attacks committed by foreign-born terrorists on American soil, as well as those who develop non-fatal health conditions later on like asthma or post-traumatic stress.

Trying to predict the exact likelihoodof a person dying in a terrorist attack of any kind is ultimately an impossibleart since the threat of terrorism constantly changes due to a large number offactors. But what we can conclude empirically is that the statistics looselytossed around by the Cato Institute are designed to make the threat of foreign-bornterrorism in the U.S. appear much lower than it actually is.

We owe it to those brave police,firefighters, first responders, and other everyday Americans who have sufferedand/or died due to terrorist attacks to craft immigration policies that preventknown, suspected or potential foreign-born terrorists from entering the UnitedStates. Nothing about the price they have paid is small.

NOTE: This isnt the first time that the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR) has called out the Cato Institute for publishing false or misleading statistics regarding immigration. In March of 2019, FAIR noted that Nowrasteh and the Cato Institute vastly underestimated the rate at which illegal aliens commit crimes. As in this case, the incorrect statistics were used to promote irresponsible mass-immigration policies.

Read the original:
The Cato Institutes Factually Flawed Attitude Toward Terrorism is Disturbing - ImmigrationReform.com

Theres a moment near the end of Control that is so unabashedly thrilling, joyous, and decadent in its design that it would make most roller coaster creators reflect on their life decisions. To say much more about the Ashtray Maze would be to spoil the giddy surprise. But its worth noting that, when its over, protagonist Jesse catches her breath and offers her analysis of the mind-blowing events that just transpired:

That was awesome.

Its not something youd expect the normally stoic Jesse to let out, given her predicament. Control is a game about navigating a paranormal US government agency in an attempt to find out the truth about what happened to your brother, and things get pretty dark. But it cuts to the core of why this is my favorite game of 2019. Remedy Entertainment didnt just create an exhilarating action sequence; it had the confidence to know that its players would be thinking the exact same thing as Jesse.

That same confidence is key to Controls storytelling, which leans heavily on the assumption that players will be invested in Remedys enigmatic lore. Control throws a lot of cryptic terminology at you from the start and trusts that youll be intrigued enough to figure out what it means down the line. For me, at least, the payoff was more than worth it.

Control is not exactly shy about its influences. There are clear references to the likes of Lost, Annihilation, SCP fiction, Twin Peaks, and House of Leaves, all wrapped up in a distinctive visual design that references brutalist architecture and 70s typography. The resulting bricolage is tremendously satisfying, feeling entirely like its own thing without being shy about the homages it is paying.

It all works because, unlike any of those aforementioned inspirations, Control is a video game. And video games, more than any other medium, are uniquely suited to the concept of a character digging up information on fascinatingly arcane subject matter. Control is a game that spends most of its running time placing you in dour office blocks, yet every dusty computer and abandoned cubicle around the corner of each right-angled corridor feels ripe with possibility. There might just be another heavily redacted email to read or grainy videotape to watch that gets you that little bit closer to understanding the Astral Plane.

Of course, Control isnt all about rifling through filing cabinets. This is an action game at its core, and Remedy adopted a relatively conventional Metroidvania-style structure where you start from a hub area and gradually unlock abilities that grant you access to new locations. The important twist, however, is that much of the best stuff is optional. Useful combat abilities are often unlocked through narrative side-quests that reward you for investigating further.

Control can be a tough game at times, and it doesnt have any difficulty settings. In the end, though, I didnt have much trouble finishing it. Far more than other comparable action-adventure games, I found myself compelled to finish as many side missions as I possibly could, which had the welcome bonus of making Jesse a lot more powerful by the end of the story. Control doesnt necessarily have the tightest combat, and some of its level-up systems are a little over-designed. But when you get to the point where youre able to fly around a vast room and use concrete pillars as a shield before flinging more masonry at your unfortunate adversaries, it rarely feels like a chore.

Thats what makes Control so special. Its unusual to come across such an ambitious game where each of its elements feels so perfectly in tune with one another, the pursuit of one rewarding you with progress elsewhere. Controls lore is rich and engrossing, and the best way to delve into it is by taking on combat challenges. The combat is experimental and satisfying, and the best way to get better at it is by exploring the games fiction. If youre not into either of these elements, you wont like Control. If youre into both, you will love it.

Control is a knockout game. It clicked with me on a level so few games do, where I wanted to read it as much as play it and play it just so I could read it more. It all comes down to Remedys confidence and, yes, control over the vision it had from the start. I believe its the best game Remedy has ever made and the best thing I played all year.

Original post:
Why Control is my game of the year - The Verge

Johann van Graan refused to criticise his players for the on-field decision to turn down a penalty at goal which would have earned them a bonus point in their 15-6 defeat by Saracens at Allianz Park. It is a decision which has left them probably needing to win their final two pool matches away to Racing and at home to the Ospreys to have any chance of again qualifying for the knockout stages of the Heineken Champions Cup.

You always back the decisions on the pitch, said Van Graan. They decided to go to the corner and unfortunately it didnt work out for us. But theres a lot of rugby left in this pool, the fact Saracens didnt get four tries means its 17 (Racing), 11 (Munster), 10 (Saracens) if Im not mistaken. The Paris game becomes a knockout game for us now, we need to go and win in Paris.

Indeed, bonus point or not, Munster were probably going to need two wins from their final two games anyway in the event of a defeat here, and for all the disruptions suffered in losing Peter OMahony before kick-off and three more World Cup internationals during the game - Tadhg Beirne, John Ryan and Andrew Conway.

Its disappointing, we came here to win, said Van Graan. We were in the game for large parts of it, but unfortunately in the last 20 minutes they were applying pressure in our 22 and they went for multiple scrums and scored the try that put us under huge pressure.

I felt their bench made a big impact and we lost Pete in the warm-up, Tadhg pretty early, John Ryan pretty early - we were quite thin there at the end. It was an incredibly tough game of rugby against the champions in their back yard, but Im incredibly proud of our guys.

The extent of OMahonys groin injury was unclear.

Its difficult to say. He pulled out, he had started the warm-up pretty well but pulled out with his groin. Its very frustrating to lose your captain in the warm-up, especially for a game like this. Then to lose Tadhg, your other loose forward, it made the lineout very interesting from our side.

Well done to Billy Holland for adapting, it was something we went hard at last weekend and we were down two men in the lineout and obviously in the poach threat as well, thats two of our best poachers. But look, thats rugby - youve got to adapt and I thought the guys that came on did all they could.

Beirnes ankle injury and Ryans calf injury both looked potentially more serious, but again it was too soon for Van Graan to provide any news. I havent spoken to him (Beirne) but it looks pretty serious. Losing John Ryan, which looks also like a pretty serious calf injury and losing Peter in the warm-up and Andrew Conway to a HIA was tough to take.

There could be ramification too as a result of the all-in brawl which spilled off the pitch in the 50th minute, and which Saracens believe was caused by something a member of the Munster backroom staff, believed to be team doctor Dr Jamie Kearns said to Jamie George. It also led to a penalty which JJ Hanrahan missed to push Munster 9-3 in front.

Look I dont know what happened here, there were a lot of people involved which is never nice to see and we missed the penalty, the score was 6-3 at that stage, said Van Graan.

Had we gone to 9-3 it might have given momentum to our side, so we missed that penalty and thats what I said earlier in the week. To come and win here, only one side has managed it, you need to be at your utmost best and take all of your opportunities and unfortunately we left one or two opportunities out there.

When it was specifically put to Van Graan that it was something Kearns said, the Munster head coach commented: Ive no idea what happened there, Ill have a look at it but Im not going to speculate. You never want to see a fight between two teams of this quality.

It subsequently transpired that Dr Kearns had apologised in person to George and while it was thought both camps are set to move on, Saracens director of rugby Mark McCall intimated that Saracens might lodge a complaint about the comments that provoked the fight.

"We need to decide to what we're going to do before I start speaking about that," McCall said. "From what I know, something pretty bad was said at Jamie. He wouldn't have reacted the way he reacted otherwise. We'll take our time to decide whether we do anything.

"I don't think what was said to Jamie was good at all . . . Owen Farrell got penalised for running into the melee but from what I saw 29 other people ran into it. It was a strange penalty to give and it was instigated by a member of their staff. We'll decide what happens next."

Read more from the original source:
Van Graan stands by decision to kick to touch - The Irish Times

Johann van Graan backed his players to make the right on-pitch decisions after Munster missed a chance to rescue a losing bonus point in a 15-6 defeat at Saracens today.

Munster had a late penalty to move within seven points of last seasons Heineken Champions Cup winners in north London but instead of kicking for goal, stand-in captain CJ Stander and his leadership group opted to go for a try and kicked for the corner.

The resulting lineout came to nothing and Munster now go into the last two rounds on 11 points, just a point in front of Saracens and six adrift of Racing 92 at the top of Pool 4 with a trip to Paris to play the table-toppers on January 12.

Head coach van Graan refused to criticise the Munster players for their call and insisted the chance to qualify for the knockout stages was still up for grabs.

"You always back the decisions on the pitch, they decided to go to the corner and unfortunately it didn't work out for us, van Graan said.

"But there's a lot of rugby left in this pool, the fact Saracens didn't get four tries means it's 17, 11, 10 if I'm not mistaken.

"The Paris game becomes a knockout game for us now, we need to go and win in Paris."

Despite losing skipper Peter OMahony to a groin problem during the warm-up and then seeing fellow back-rower Tadhg Beirne leave the game on a stretcher with an ankle or lower leg injury after just 10 minutes, then prop John Ryan to a calf injury before the half-hour mark, Munster held their own against a near full-strength Saracens side and broke a half-time deadlock with a 44th-minute JJ Hanrahan penalty to move into as 6-3 lead.

A mass brawl between the teams soon afterwards that had appeared to have been sparked by an argument between Saracens hooker Jamie George and Munster doctor Jamie Kearns, handed the visitors another penalty as the home side looked rattled but Hanrahan pushed his kicked wide.

Saracens rallied from that point and tries from Sean Maitland and Mako Vunipola sealed their win, much to Munsters frustration.

It's disappointing, we came here to win, van Graan said. We were in the game for large parts of it, but unfortunately in the last 20 minutes they were applying pressure in our 22 and they went for multiple scrums and scored the try that put us under huge pressure

"I felt their bench made a big impact and we lost Pete in the warm-up, Tadhg pretty early, John Ryan pretty early... we were quite thin there at the end.

"It was an incredibly tough game of rugby against the champions in their backyard but I'm incredibly proud of our guys."

Of the fight early in the second half, the Munster boss said: I don't know what happened here, there were a lot of people involved which is never nice to see and we missed the penalty, the score was 6-3 at that stage.

"Had we gone to 9-3 it might have given momentum to our side, so we missed that penalty and that's what I said earlier in the week - to come and win here, only one side has managed it (in Europe), you need to be at your utmost best and take all of your opportunities and unfortunately we left one or two opportunities out there."

Picture: INPHO/Billy Stickland

Saracens boss Mark McCall repeated his defence coach Alex Sandersons claim that Munster doctor Kearns had said something untoward to Jamie George to spark the brawl and that his club would consider taking further action.

We need to decide what we're going to do before I start speaking about that. From what I know, something pretty bad was said at Jamie (George).

"He wouldn't have reacted the way he reacted otherwise. We'll take our time to decide whether we do anything.

I don't think what was said to Jamie was good at all. We'll see. If a doctor....we just have to decide....because it started a 30-man brawl.

"Owen Farrell got penalised for running into the melee but from what I saw 29 other people ran into it.

"It was a strange penalty to give and it was instigated by a member of their staff who said something horrible to one of our players.

"We'll decide what happens next.

More here:
Van Graan: 'You always back the decisions on the pitch' - Irish Examiner