Media Search:



Can synthetic biology help deliver an AI brain as smart as the real thing? – Genetic Literacy Project

In building the worlds first airplane at the dawn of the 20th century, the Wright Brothers took inspiration from the insightful movements of birds. They observed and reverse-engineered aspects of the wing in nature, which in turn helped them make important discoveries about aerodynamics and propulsion.

Similarly, to build machines that think, why not seek inspiration from the three pounds of matter that operates between our ears? Geoffrey Hinton, a pioneer ofartificial intelligenceand winner of theTuring Award, seemed to agree: I have always been convinced that the only way to get artificial intelligence to work is to do the computation in a way similar to the human brain.

So whats next for artificial intelligence (AI)?Could the next wave of AI be inspired by rapid advances in biology?Can the tools for understanding brain circuits at the molecular level lead us to a higher, systems-level understanding of how the human mind works?

The answer is likely yes, and the flow of ideas between learning about biological systems and developing artificial ones has actually been going on for decades.

First of all, what does biology have to do with machine learning? It may surprise you to learn that much of the progress in machine learning stems from insights from psychology and neuroscience. Reinforcement learning (RL) one of the three paradigms of machine learning (the two others being supervised learning and unsupervised learning) originates from animal and cognitive neuroscience studies going all the way back to the 1940s. RL is central to some of todays most advanced AI systems, such asAlphaGo, the widely-publicized AI agent developed by leading AI companyGoogle DeepMind. AlphaGo defeated the worlds top-ranked players atGo, a Chinese board game that comprises more board combinations than there are atoms in the universe.

Despite AlphaGos superhuman performance in the game of Go, its human opponent still possesses far more general intelligence. He can drive a car, speak languages, play soccer, and perform a myriad of other tasks in any kind of environment. Current AI systems are largely incapable of using the knowledge learned to play poker and transfer it to another task, like playing a game of Cluedo. These systems are focused on a single, narrow environment and require vast amounts of data, and training time. And still, they make simple errors like mistaking achihuahua for a muffin!

Similar to child learning, reinforcement learning is based on the AI systems interaction with its environment. It performs actions that seek to maximize the reward and avoid punishments. Driven by curiosity, children are active learners that simultaneously explore their surrounding environment and predict their actions outcomes, allowing them to build mental models to think causally. If, for example, they decide to push the red car, spill the flower vase, or crawl the other direction, they will adjust their behavior based on the outcomes of their actions.

Children experience different environments in which they find themselves navigating and interacting with various contexts and objects dispositions, often in unusual manners. Just as child brain development could inspire the development of AI systems, the RL agents learning mechanisms are parallel to the brains learning mechanisms driven by the release of dopamine a neurotransmitter key to the central nervous system which trains the prefrontal cortex in response to experiences and thus shapes stimulus-response associations as well as outcome predictions.

Biology is one of the most promising beneficiaries of artificial intelligence.From investigating mind-boggling combinations of genetic mutations that contribute to obesity to examining the byzantine pathways that lead some cells to go haywire and produce cancer, biology produces an inordinate amount of complex, convoluted data. But the information contained within these datasets often offers valuable insights that could be used to improve our health.

In the field of synthetic biology, where engineers seek to rewire living organisms and program them with new functions,many scientists are harnessing AI to design more effective experiments, analyze their data, and use it to create groundbreaking therapeutics. I recently highlightedfive companies that are integrating machine learning with synthetic biologyto pave the way for better science and better engineering.

Artificial general intelligence (AGI) describes a system that is capable of mimicking human-like abilities such as planning, reasoning, or emotions. Billions of dollars have been invested in this exciting and potentially lucrative area, leading some to make claims like data is the new oil.

Among the many companies working on general artificial intelligence are GooglesDeepMind, the Swiss AI labIDSIA, Nnaisense,Vicarious,Maluuba, theOpenCog Foundation, Adaptive AI,LIDA, andNumenta. Organizations such as theMachine Intelligence Research InstituteandOpenAIalso state AGI as their main goal. One of the goals of the internationalHuman Brain Projectis to simulate the human brain.

Despite a growing body of talent, tools, and high-quality data needed to achieve AGI, we still have a long way to go to achieve this.

Today, AI techniques such as Machine Learning (ML) are ubiquitous in our society, reaching from healthcare and manufacturing to transportation and warfare but are qualified as narrow AI. They indeed process and learn powerfully large amounts of data to identify insightful and informative patterns for a single task, such as predicting airline ticket prices, distinguishing dogs from cats in images, and generating your movie recommendations on Netflix.

In biology, AI is also changing your health care. It is generating more and better drug candidates (Insitro), sequencing your genome (Veritas Genetics), and detecting your cancer earlier and earlier (Freenom).

As humans, we are able to quickly acquire knowledge in one context and generalize it to another environment across novel multiple situations and tasks, which would allow us to develop more efficient self-driving car systems as they need to perform many tasks on the road concurrently. In AI research, this concept is known as transfer learning. It assists an AI system in learning from just a few examples instead of the millions that traditional computing systems usually need to build a system that learns from first principles, abstracts the acquired knowledge, and generalizes it to new tasks and contexts.

To produce more advanced AI, we need to better understand the brains inner workings that allow us to portray the world around us. There is a synergistic mission between understanding biological intelligence and creating an artificial one, seeking inspiration from our brain might help us bridge that gap.

John Cumbers is the founder and CEO ofSynBioBeta, the leading community of innovators, investors, engineers, and thinkers who share a passion for using synthetic biology to build a better, more sustainable universe. He publishes the weekly SynBioBeta Digest, host theSynBioBeta Podcast, and wroteWhats Your Biostrategy?, the first book to anticipate how synthetic biology is going to disrupt virtually every industry in the world. He earned his PhD in Molecular Biology, Cell Biology, and Biochemistry from Brown University. Follow him on Twitter @SynBioBeta or @johncumbers

A version of this article was originally published on Forbes website as Can Synthetic Biology Inspire The Next Wave Of AI? and has been republished here with permission.

See the original post here:
Can synthetic biology help deliver an AI brain as smart as the real thing? - Genetic Literacy Project

New York University Partners with IBM to Explore Quantum Computing for Simulation of Quantum Systems and Advancing Quantum Education – Quantaneo, the…

The announcement of the agreement was made during CES 2020, the annual global technology conference and showcase in Las Vegas.

Together with the Air Force Research Lab (AFRL) and IBM, NYU will explore quantum computing research to study measurement-based quantum computing, materials discovery with variational quantum eigensolver, and emulating new phases on small quantum systems.

We are excited to join AFRL and IBM to transform quantum computing concepts into a powerful technology by educating a new quantum workforce, expanding our scientific partnership and engaging in cross disciplinary collaboration, said Javad Shabani, an assistant professor of physics at NYU.

Under the agreement to join the AFRL hub, NYU will be part of a community of Fortune 500 companies, startups, academic institutions, and research labs working to advance quantum computing and explore practical applications. NYU will leverage IBMs quantum expertise and resources, Qiskit software and developer tools, and will have cloud-based access to IBMs Quantum Computation Center. IBM offers, through the cloud, 15 of the most advanced universal quantum computing systems available, including a 53-qubit qubit systemthe largest commercially available system in the industry.

Read this article:
New York University Partners with IBM to Explore Quantum Computing for Simulation of Quantum Systems and Advancing Quantum Education - Quantaneo, the...

Were approaching the limits of computer power we need new programmers now – The Guardian

Way back in the 1960s, Gordon Moore, the co-founder of Intel, observed that the number of transistors that could be fitted on a silicon chip was doubling every two years. Since the transistor count is related to processing power, that meant that computing power was effectively doubling every two years. Thus was born Moores law, which for most people working in the computer industry or at any rate those younger than 40 has provided the kind of bedrock certainty that Newtons laws of motion did for mechanical engineers.

There is, however, one difference. Moores law is just a statement of an empirical correlation observed over a particular period in history and we are reaching the limits of its application. In 2010, Moore himself predicted that the laws of physics would call a halt to the exponential increases. In terms of size of transistor, he said, you can see that were approaching the size of atoms, which is a fundamental barrier, but itll be two or three generations before we get that far but thats as far out as weve ever been able to see. We have another 10 to 20 years before we reach a fundamental limit.

Weve now reached 2020 and so the certainty that we will always have sufficiently powerful computing hardware for our expanding needs is beginning to look complacent. Since this has been obvious for decades to those in the business, theres been lots of research into ingenious ways of packing more computing power into machines, for example using multi-core architectures in which a CPU has two or more separate processing units called cores in the hope of postponing the awful day when the silicon chip finally runs out of road. (The new Apple Mac Pro, for example, is powered by a 28-core Intel Xeon processor.) And of course there is also a good deal of frenzied research into quantum computing, which could, in principle, be an epochal development.

But computing involves a combination of hardware and software and one of the predictable consequences of Moores law is that it made programmers lazier. Writing software is a craft and some people are better at it than others. They write code that is more elegant and, more importantly, leaner, so that it executes faster. In the early days, when the hardware was relatively primitive, craftsmanship really mattered. When Bill Gates was a lad, for example, he wrote a Basic interpreter for one of the earliest microcomputers, the TRS-80. Because the machine had only a tiny read-only memory, Gates had to fit it into just 16 kilobytes. He wrote it in assembly language to increase efficiency and save space; theres a legend that for years afterwards he could recite the entire program by heart.

There are thousands of stories like this from the early days of computing. But as Moores law took hold, the need to write lean, parsimonious code gradually disappeared and incentives changed. Programming became industrialised as software engineering. The construction of sprawling software ecosystems such as operating systems and commercial applications required large teams of developers; these then spawned associated bureaucracies of project managers and executives. Large software projects morphed into the kind of death march memorably chronicled in Fred Brookss celebrated book, The Mythical Man-Month, which was published in 1975 and has never been out of print, for the very good reason that its still relevant. And in the process, software became bloated and often inefficient.

But this didnt matter because the hardware was always delivering the computing power that concealed the bloatware problem. Conscientious programmers were often infuriated by this. The only consequence of the powerful hardware I see, wrote one, is that programmers write more and more bloated software on it. They become lazier, because the hardware is fast they do not try to learn algorithms nor to optimise their code this is crazy!

It is. In a lecture in 1997, Nathan Myhrvold, who was once Bill Gatess chief technology officer, set out his Four Laws of Software. 1: software is like a gas it expands to fill its container. 2: software grows until it is limited by Moores law. 3: software growth makes Moores law possible people buy new hardware because the software requires it. And, finally, 4: software is only limited by human ambition and expectation.

As Moores law reaches the end of its dominion, Myhrvolds laws suggest that we basically have only two options. Either we moderate our ambitions or we go back to writing leaner, more efficient code. In other words, back to the future.

What just happened?Writer and researcher Dan Wang has a remarkable review of the year in technology on his blog, including an informed, detached perspective on the prospects for Chinese domination of new tech.

Algorithm says noTheres a provocative essay by Cory Doctorow on the LA Review of Books blog on the innate conservatism of machine-learning.

Fall of the big beastsHow to lose a monopoly: Microsoft, IBM and antitrust is a terrific long-view essay about company survival and change by Benedict Evans on his blog.

See the original post:
Were approaching the limits of computer power we need new programmers now - The Guardian

Quantum Computing Technologies Market to Witness Huge Growth by 2020-2025, Latest study reveals – ReportsPioneer

The Global Quantum Computing Technologies Market has witnessed continuous growth in the past few years and is projected to grow even further during the forecast period (2020-2025). The assessment provides a 360 view and insights, outlining the key outcomes of the industry. These insights help the business decision-makers to formulate better business plans and make informed decisions for improved profitability. In addition, the study helps venture capitalists in understanding the companies better and make informed decisions. Some of the key players in the Global Quantum Computing Technologies market are Airbus Group, Cambridge Quantum Computing, IBM, Google Quantum AI Lab, Microsoft Quantum Architectures, Nokia Bell Labs, Alibaba Group Holding Limited, Intel Corporation & Toshiba

Whats keeping Airbus Group, Cambridge Quantum Computing, IBM, Google Quantum AI Lab, Microsoft Quantum Architectures, Nokia Bell Labs, Alibaba Group Holding Limited, Intel Corporation & Toshiba Ahead in the Market? Benchmark yourself with the strategic moves and findings recently released by HTF MI

Get Sample Pdf with Latest Figures @:https://www.htfmarketreport.com/sample-report/1812333-global-quantum-computing-technologies-market-3

The Major Players Covered in this Report:Airbus Group, Cambridge Quantum Computing, IBM, Google Quantum AI Lab, Microsoft Quantum Architectures, Nokia Bell Labs, Alibaba Group Holding Limited, Intel Corporation & Toshiba

By the product type, the market is primarily split into:, Software & Hardware

By the end users/application, this report covers the following segments:Government, Business, High-Tech, Banking & Securities, Manufacturing & Logistics, Insurance & Other

Regional Analysis for Quantum Computing Technologies Market:United States, Europe, China, Japan, Southeast Asia, India & Central & South America

For Consumer Centric Market, below information can be provided as part of customization

Survey Analysis will be provided by Age, Gender, Occupation, Income Level or Education

Consumer Traits (If Applicable) Buying patterns (e.g. comfort & convenience, economical, pride) Buying behavior (e.g. seasonal, usage rate) Lifestyle (e.g. health conscious, family orientated, community active) Expectations (e.g. service, quality, risk, influence)

The Global Quantum Computing Technologies Market study also covers market status, share, future patterns, development rate, deals, SWOT examination, channels, merchants, and improvement gets ready for anticipated year between 2020-2025. It aims to strategically analyse the market with respect to individual growth trends, prospects, and their contribution to the market. The report attempts to forecast the market size for 5 major regions, namely, North America, Europe, Asia Pacific (APAC), Middle East and Africa (MEA), and Latin America.

If you need any specific requirement Ask to our Expert @https://www.htfmarketreport.com/enquiry-before-buy/1812333-global-quantum-computing-technologies-market-3

The Quantum Computing Technologies market factors described in this report are:-Key Strategic Developments in Global Quantum Computing Technologies Market:The research includes the key strategic developments of the market, comprising R&D, M&A, agreements, new product launch, collaborations, partnerships, joint ventures, and regional growth of the key competitors functioning in the market on a global and regional scale.

Key Market Features in Global Quantum Computing Technologies Market:The report assessed key market features, including revenue, capacity, price, capacity utilization rate, production rate, gross, production, consumption, import/export, supply/demand, cost, market share, CAGR, and gross margin. In addition to that, the study provides a comprehensive analysis of the key market factors and their latest trends, along with relevant market segments and sub-segments.

Analytical Market Highlights & ApproachThe Global Quantum Computing Technologies Market report provides the rigorously studied and evaluated data of the top industry players and their scope in the market by means of several analytical tools. The analytical tools such as Porters five forces analysis, feasibility study, SWOT analysis, and ROI analysis have been practiced reviewing the growth of the key players operating in the market.

Table of Contents :Global Quantum Computing Technologies Market Study Coverage:It includes key manufacturers covered, key market segments, the scope of products offered in the global Colposcopy market, years considered, and study objectives. Additionally, it touches the segmentation study provided in the report on the basis of the type of product and application.

Global Quantum Computing Technologies Market Executive SummaryIt gives a summary of key studies, market growth rate, competitive landscape, market drivers, trends, and issues, and macroscopic indicators.Global Quantum Computing Technologies Market Production by RegionHere, the report provides information related to import and export, production, revenue, and key players of all regional markets studied.Global Quantum Computing Technologies Market Profile of ManufacturersEach player profiled in this section is studied on the basis of SWOT analysis, their products, production, value, capacity, and other vital factors.

For Complete table of Contents please click here @https://www.htfmarketreport.com/reports/1812333-global-quantum-computing-technologies-market-3

Key Points Covered in Quantum Computing Technologies Market Report:Quantum Computing Technologies Overview, Definition and ClassificationMarket drivers and barriersQuantum Computing Technologies Market Competition by ManufacturersQuantum Computing Technologies Capacity, Production, Revenue (Value) by Region (2020-2025)Quantum Computing Technologies Supply (Production), Consumption, Export, Import by Region (2020-2025)Quantum Computing Technologies Production, Revenue (Value), Price Trend by Type {, Software & Hardware}Quantum Computing Technologies Market Analysis by Application {Government, Business, High-Tech, Banking & Securities, Manufacturing & Logistics, Insurance & Other}Quantum Computing Technologies Manufacturers Profiles/AnalysisQuantum Computing Technologies Manufacturing Cost AnalysisIndustrial/Supply Chain Analysis, Sourcing Strategy and Downstream BuyersMarketing Strategy by Key Manufacturers/Players, Connected Distributors/TradersStandardization, Regulatory and collaborative initiativesIndustry road map and value chainMarket Effect Factors Analysis

Buy the PDF Report @https://www.htfmarketreport.com/buy-now?format=1&report=1812333

Thanks for reading this article; you can also get individual chapter wise section or region wise report version like North America, Europe or Asia.

About Author:HTF Market Report is a wholly owned brand of HTF market Intelligence Consulting Private Limited. HTF Market Report global research and market intelligence consulting organization is uniquely positioned to not only identify growth opportunities but to also empower and inspire you to create visionary growth strategies for futures, enabled by our extraordinary depth and breadth of thought leadership, research, tools, events and experience that assist you for making goals into a reality. Our understanding of the interplay between industry convergence, Mega Trends, technologies and market trends provides our clients with new business models and expansion opportunities. We are focused on identifying the Accurate Forecast in every industry we cover so our clients can reap the benefits of being early market entrants and can accomplish their Goals & Objectives.

Contact US :Craig Francis (PR & Marketing Manager)HTF Market Intelligence Consulting Private LimitedUnit No. 429, Parsonage Road Edison, NJNew Jersey USA 08837Phone: +1 (206) 317 1218[emailprotected]

Connect with us atLinkedIn|Facebook|Twitter

Read more here:
Quantum Computing Technologies Market to Witness Huge Growth by 2020-2025, Latest study reveals - ReportsPioneer

January 9th: France will unveil its quantum strategy. What can we expect from this report? – Quantaneo, the Quantum Computing Source

It is eagerly awaited! The "Forteza" report, named after its rapporteur, Paula Forteza, Member of Parliament for La Rpublique en Marche (political party of actual President Emmanuel Macron), should finally be officially revealed on January 9th. The three rapporteurs are Paula Forteza, Member of Parliament for French Latin America and the Caribbean, Jean-Paul Herteman, former CEO of Safran, and Iordanis Kerenidis, researcher at the CNRS. Announced last April, this report was initially due at the end of August, then in November, then... No doubt the complex agenda, between the social movements in France, and the active participation of the MP in the Parisian election campaign of Cdric Villani, mathematician and dissident of La Rpublique en Marche... had to be shaken up. In any case, it is thus finally on January 9th that this report entitled "Quantum: the technological shift that France will not miss", will be unveiled.

"Entrusted by the Prime Minister in April 2019, the mission on quantum technologies ends with the submission of the report by the three rapporteurs Paula Forteza, Jean-Paul Herteman, and Iordanis Kerenidis. Fifty proposals and recommendations are thus detailed in order to strengthen France's role and international position on these complex but highly strategic technologies. The in-depth work carried out over the last few months, fueled by numerous consultations with scientific experts in the field, has led the rapporteurs to the conclusion that France's success in this field will be achieved by making quantum technologies more accessible and more attractive. This is one of the sine qua non conditions for the success of the French strategy", explains the French National Congress in the invitation to the official presentation ceremony of the report.

The presentation, by the three rapporteurs, will be made in the presence of the ministers for the army, the economy and finance, and higher education and research. The presence of the Minister of the Armed Forces, as well as the co-signature of the report by the former president of Safran, already indicates that military applications will be one of the main areas of proposals, and possibly of funding. Just as is the case in the United States, China or Russia.

Of course, the report will go into detail about the role of research, and of the CNRS, in advances in quantum computing and communication. Of course, the excellent work of French researchers, in collaboration with their European peers, will be highlighted. And of course, France's excellence in these fields will be explained. France is a pioneer in this field, but the important questions are precisely what the next steps will be. The National Congress indicates that this report will present 50 "proposals and recommendations". Are we to conclude that it will be just a list of proposals? Or will we know how to move from advice to action?

These are our pending questions:

- The United States is announcing an investment of USD 1.2 billion, China perhaps USD 10 billion, Great Britain about 1 billion euros, while Amazon's R&D budget alone is USD 18 billion... how can a country like France position itself regarding the scale of these investments? To sum up, is the amount of funds allocated to this research and development in line with the ambitions?

- Mastering quantum technologies are becoming a geopolitical issue between the United States and China. Should Europe master its own technologies so as not to depend on these two major powers? On the other hand, is this not the return of a quantum "Plan calcul from the 60s? How can we avoid repeating the same mistakes?

- Cecilia Bonefeld-Dahl, Managing Director of DigitalEurope recently wrote that Europe risks being deprived of the use of quantum technologies if it does not develop them itself. Christophe Jurzcak, the head of Quantonation, stated that it is not certain that France will have access to quantum technologies if it does not develop them itself. Is this realistic? Do we have the ressources?

- French companies currently invest very little in research in the field of quantum computing. With the exception of Airbus, the main feedback that we know of is in Canada, Australia, Spain, Germany, etc. Should we also help companies to embrace these technologies, or should we only finance research and development on the part of universities and business creators? Is there a support component for companies? So that technologies are not simply developed in France and sold elsewhere, but that France is the leading market for local developments.

See you on January 9th on Decideo for more details and our objective analysis of the content of this document.

See the original post:
January 9th: France will unveil its quantum strategy. What can we expect from this report? - Quantaneo, the Quantum Computing Source