Media Search:



Vote on immigration reform – Yahoo News

The Conversation

U.S. taxpayers spend more than $2 billion annually in tax preparation fees. Nora Carol Photography/Getty ImagesThe Internal Revenue Service has postponed the April 15 tax filing deadline to May 17. If taxpayers need even more time to file federal returns, the agency added, they can request an extension until Oct. 15. This continues to be a tough time for many people, and the IRS wants to continue to do everything possible to help taxpayers navigate the unusual circumstances related to the pandemic, while also working on important tax administration responsibilities, said IRS Commissioner Chuck Rettig. The announcement may come as welcome news for many Americans, but it also raises an important question: Why should taxpayers have to navigate the tedious, costly tax filing system at all? The case for a simple return In 1985, President Ronald Reagan promised a return-free tax system in which half of all Americans would never fill out a tax return again. Under the framework, taxpayers with simple returns would automatically receive a refund or a letter detailing any tax owed. Taxpayers with more complicated returns would use the system in place today. In 2006, President Barack Obamas chief economist, Austan Goolsbee, premiered the simple return, where taxpayers would receive already completed tax forms for their review or correction. Goolsbee estimated his system would save taxpayers more than US$2 billion a year in tax preparation fees. Though never implemented, the two proposals illustrate what we all know: No one enjoys filling out tax forms. So why do we have to? A costly and time-consuming system Return-free filing is not difficult. At least 30 countries permit return-free filing, including Denmark, Sweden, Spain and the United Kingdom. Furthermore, 95% of American taxpayers receive more than 30 types of information returns that let the government know their exact income. These information returns give the government everything it needs in order to fill out most taxpayers returns. The U.S. system is 10 times more expensive than tax systems in 36 other countries with robust economies. But those costs vanish in a return-free system, as would the 2.6 billion hours Americans spend on tax preparation each year. Maybe youre wondering whether Congress is just behind the times, unaware that it can release us from tax preparation? Not true. As an expert on the U.S. tax system, I see Americas costly and time-consuming tax reporting system as a consequence of its relationship with the commercial tax preparation industry, which lobbies Congress to maintain the status quo. The United Kingdom is among dozens of countries that permit return-free filing for some taxpayers. Loop Images/Universal Images Group via Getty Images Commercial tax preparation Almost 20 years ago, Congress directed the IRS to provide low-income taxpayers with free tax preparation. The agency responded in 2002 with Free File, a public-private partnership between the government and the tax preparation industry. As part of the deal, the IRS agreed to not compete with the private sector in the free tax preparation market. In 2007, the House of Representatives rejected legislation to provide free, government tax preparation. And in 2019, Congress tried to legally bar the IRS from ever providing free online tax preparation services. Only a public outcry turned the tide. The public part of Free File consists of the IRS herding taxpayers to commercial tax preparation websites. The private part consists of those commercial entities diverting taxpayers toward costly alternatives. According to the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration, which oversees IRS activities, private partners use computer code to hide the free websites and take unsuspecting taxpayers to paid sites. Should a taxpayer discover a free preparation alternative, the private preparers impose various restrictions such as income or the use of various forms as an excuse to kick taxpayers back to paid preparation. Consequently, of the more than 100 million taxpayers eligible for free help, 35% end up paying for tax preparation and 60% never even visit the free websites. Instead of 70% of Americans receiving free tax preparation, commercial companies whittle that percentage down to 3%. Tax savings and evasion Perhaps you are guessing that there are valid policy justifications for avoiding government and empowering the private sector. Judge those arguments yourself. One argument from commercial tax preparers is that taxpayers will miss out on valuable tax savings if they rely on free government preparation. In fact, the government software would reflect the same laws used by the paid preparers with the same access to tax saving deductions or credits. Further, tax preparers like H & R Block promise to pay all taxes and interest resulting from a failed audit. As a result, these services have every incentive to take conservative, pro-government tax positions. A second argument is that government-prepared tax returns encourage tax evasion. In a no-return system, the government reveals its knowledge of the taxpayers income before the taxpayer files. Thus, the argument goes, the taxpayer knows if the government has missed something and has reason to let the mistake stand. But taxpayers already know what information forms the government has because they receive duplicates of those forms. The incentive to lie does not increase because the taxpayer avoids weeks of tax preparation. [Youre smart and curious about the world. So are The Conversations authors and editors. You can get our highlights each weekend.] Bolstering the anti-taxers Finally, there is the anti-tax argument for onerous tax preparation: Keep tax preparation unpleasant to fuel anti-tax sentiment. In the past, Republicans argued against high taxes. But after decades of tax cuts, Americans are no longer swayed by that argument. Exasperating tax preparation, according to this argument, helps keep the anti-tax fever high. And that fuels public hate for government and the tax system. Unfortunately, the anti-tax contingents desire to force Americans to spend time and money on tax preparation dovetails with the tax preparation industrys desire to collect billions of dollars in fees. Tax preparation companies lobby Congress to keep tax preparation costly and complicated. Indeed, Intuit, maker of TurboTax, the tax preparation software, lists government tax preparation as a threat to its business model. One example is the earned income tax credit, a government program for low-income people. The credit is so complicated that 20% of the people who are eligible never file. If the government prepared peoples tax returns, that 20% would receive government support. Nonetheless, Intuit has lobbied lawmakers to make the credit more complicated, thereby driving more taxpayers to paid preparation services. To date, the tax preparation industry has kept the system complicated because the potential cost to it in terms of lost revenue is vast. Only public outcry can change the system.This article is republished from The Conversation, a nonprofit news site dedicated to sharing ideas from academic experts. It was written by: Beverly Moran, Vanderbilt University. Read more:As Australias COVID vaccine rollout splutters, we need transparency about when international borders might reopenHow American tax laws encourage inequality Beverly Moran does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organization that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

View original post here:
Vote on immigration reform - Yahoo News

Budget 2021: Chancellor announces further immigration reform – Lexology

The budget is not normally somewhere that Global Mobility professionals look to for policy reform, however the Chancellor of the Exchequer, Rishi Sunak, announced a number of changes to the UK immigration system in Wednesdays budget.

The key tag line that the government wants to reform the immigration system [to] help ambitious UK businesses attract the brightest and best international talent is hardly revolutionary, in fact it could be argued that any government that didnt buy into this principle would be acting irresponsibly. However, the budget publication does provide some good detail to support this ambition:

How will this help companies attract global talent?

The recent overhaul of the immigration system as a result of leaving the EU already means that UK businesses can hire in a significantly wider range of skilled roles from around the world, however when it comes to attracting the very brightest there has been little reform. The Global Talent visa (previously known as Tier 1 Global Talent) already allows recognised leaders and potential leaders in academia or research, arts & culture and digital technology to move to the UK, and the reforms announced to this category are unlikely to drastically change who will be eligible. Rather the reforms will simply make the application process easier, which may result in more recognised leaders choosing to move to the UK.

The Global Talent scheme only benefits a small area of the economy, however the announcement to provide practical support to small firms using the immigration system has the potential to really help British businesses attract talent from around the world. Something that puts a lot of small businesses off using t the immigration system is the upfront cost, however with the correct support and guidance these businesses can start to see the cost as a strategic investment rather than an administrative expense.

Where are the shortages in global talent and will the new fast-track immigration proposals help this?

The government maintains a Shortage Occupation List which is published in the Immigration Rules, and this list is dominated by STEM, creative, health and education roles. The announcements in the budget appear to show that the government is concentrating on only a small number of these roles and is paying particular attention to the fintech industry. Special treatment for scale-up companies the evolved form of a start-up, appears to be specifically focused at the fintech industry as this was one of the recommendations made in the Kalifa review, published less than a week before the budget.

The government appears to be doubling down on its support of the fintech industry, and is possibly an indicator that they are prepared to take a more sector based approach in helping develop high potential industries or supporting those that need a helping hand to remain competitive. The fintech industry is a good place to start as it is showing significant potential and also scalability, however if this government wants to make serious inroads into addressing the UKs shortage occupations it needs to continue expanding this approach into other sectors such as life sciences and manufacturing.

How will the new rules work and who will benefit?

The majority of the changes announced in the budget will not go live until Spring 2022, therefore the government will be publishing the detail on these changes over the course of the year.

The Home Office has historically been very slow and at times reluctant to adopt new ways of working, especially when it comes to digitising the immigration system, however the announcements in the budget appear to show that there is a renewed focus on modernising the infrastructure of the immigration system and making it easier to use.

Modernising the Sponsor Management System has been long overdue the system has not had any major upgrades since it went live in 2008. If this is done correctly it will make it significantly easier for Sponsor Licence holders to ensure they are compliant, and will also reduce the requirement for specialist intervention for administrative tasks such as reporting a change in a workers job title.

The announcements in the budget will primarily benefit 4 types of business;

There is certainly a great deal more work required to make the UK the leading destination for global talent, however the announcements in the budget are certainly a step in the right direction and should be welcomed by all areas of the economy.

View original post here:
Budget 2021: Chancellor announces further immigration reform - Lexology

Rep. Carlos Gimenez Calls For Immigration Reform After Visit To Texas Border – Yahoo News

CBS4's Ted Scouten has more from Gimenez's press conference. Read more: https://cbsloc.al/3eIm8wV

CARLOS GIMENEZ: We need to come up with a comprehensive policy of what to do with-- with the children.

LAUREN PASTRANA: Now, at 5:30, Congressman Carlos Gimenez calling for change amid the crisis at the US Southern border. Gimenez urged lawmakers to overhaul immigration policies, as the surge in migrant crossings in recent weeks has opened up a political debate.

ELIOTT RODRIGUEZ: The White House says it's looking for shelters to house those children. But Republicans are blaming the White House for the increasing numbers. CBS 4's Ted Scouten has more on the congressman's visit.

CARLOS GIMENEZ: What's happening at the border is really a humanitarian crisis.

TED SCOUTEN: Congressman Carlos Gimenez, just back from a trip to the Texas-Mexico border, with fellow Republican lawmakers-- an estimated 4,200 unaccompanied children are being held after crossing the border alone.

CARLOS GIMENEZ: It really broke my heart to see those hundreds of kids ranging, I would think, from like four until about 17. And there are literally hundreds of them there.

TED SCOUTEN: Congresswoman Gimenez has said the president is to blame for the influx of migrants making their way to the US.

CARLOS GIMENEZ: So this is just the beginning of what we consider to be an onslaught due to the change in policies that we see from the Biden administration.

TED SCOUTEN: He said we need more border agents and to finish construction of key parts of Trump's border wall.

CARLOS GIMENEZ: We need to restore order to our border. We need hundreds of more judges to be able to expedite the asylum hearings of these migrants that are coming over.

TED SCOUTEN: Democratic Congresswoman Frederica Wilson said the Biden administration needs time to fix the problem.

FREDERICA WILSON: You have to remember that Mr Biden has only been in office for, like, 60 days. So all of this happened under Mr. Trump. You have to remember he has inherited a crisis. So we have to give him the opportunity to solve that crisis.

Story continues

TED SCOUTEN: 3,000 teenage boys may be headed to the Dallas Convention Center for temporary shelter. Congressman Gimenez said we could end up seeing kids once again at the holding facility in Homestead.

CARLOS GIMENEZ: We haven't heard officially that's going to be open. But I would expect with opening up a convention center in Dallas that eventually, you know, this may be open.

MARIA RODRIGUEZ: A expedited program to get those kids in the homes reunited with their family members or their sponsors is key.

TED SCOUTEN: Advocates from the Florida Immigrant Coalition say kids should not be held in detention centers.

MELISSA TAVERAS: Put them in facilities that feel like homes. Put them with foster parents or churches, like they did with the Peter Pan kids when they came from Cuba.

TED SCOUTEN: The Biden administration is now calling on FEMA to help with logistics in trying to process and shelter these children. Ted Scouten, CBS 4 News.

See original here:
Rep. Carlos Gimenez Calls For Immigration Reform After Visit To Texas Border - Yahoo News

These Are The 10 Most Conservative Cities In Massachusetts …

Editors Note: We updated this article for 2019. This is our third time ranking the most conservative places to live in Massachusetts.

Swipe left for slideshow. Article continues below.

Well this has been one heck of a couple of years for the Republican Party. Never in my life time have I see anything like it given thats a relatively short lifetime, but whos counting?

And now that were headed towards the next big election, we wanted to get a better sense of what parts of Massachusetts would be the most likely to back Donald Trump again.

Specifically, which cities have the highest number of conservative voters in the Bay State?

In order to do so, we turned our sites on measuring how each city in Massachusetts with populations greater than 12,000 voted and contributed to political campaigns in the past several years. The cities with the highest percentage of voters who voted republican and gave the most to conservatives where named the most conservative cities in the state.

If youre wondering, Boston is the most liberal city in Massachusetts of all those we measured.

And to be clear, we didnt form this list based on our own biases we relied on the cold hard data. For more on how we ran the numbers, keep on reading. Then well take a closer look at each of our top 10 most conservative cities in Massachusetts.

And if you already knew these places were conservative, check out some more reading about Massachusetts and the most conservative places in the country:

We started by making a list of every city in Massachusetts over 12,000 people based on the 2013-2017 American Community Survey (The most recent data). That left us with 53 cities and towns.

We then measured the voting record and donation data to determine which places lean the most rightward in their allegiances by:

Next, we ranked each city from 1 to 53 for each of the criteria where number one was the most conservative.

The winner, Brockton, is The Most Conservative City in Massachusetts For 2019.

Lets go through these conservative places, shall we?

Population: 95,161Percent Republican: 42.5%$ Republican Amount Per Capita: $0.6# Republican Contributions Per Capita: 0.0More on Brockton:Photos |Data

Brockton is a city in Plymouth County, Massachusetts, United States; the population was 95,314 in the 2015 Census. Brockton, along with Plymouth, are the county seats of Plymouth County. Brockton is the seventh largest city in Massachusetts and is sometimes referred to as the City of Champions, due to the success of native boxers Rocky Marciano and Marvin Hagler, as well as its successful Brockton High School sports programs. Two of the villages within the city are Montello and Campello, both have the distinction of having their own MBTA Commuter Rail Stations and post offices. Campello is the smallest neighborhood in the city, but also the most populous. Brockton hosts a baseball team, the Brockton Rox. Brockton is one of the windiest cities in the United States, with an average wind speed of 14.3mph.

Population: 44,326Percent Republican: 41.8%$ Republican Amount Per Capita: $1.24# Republican Contributions Per Capita: 0.01More on Attleboro:Photos |Data

Attleboro is a city in Bristol County, Massachusetts, United States. It was once known as The Jewelry Capital of the World for its many jewelry manufacturers. According to the 2010 census, Attleboro had a population of 43,593 in 2010.

Source: Public domain

Population: 89,258Percent Republican: 41.8%$ Republican Amount Per Capita: $1.07# Republican Contributions Per Capita: 0.01More on Fall River:Photos |Data

Fall River is a city in Bristol County, Massachusetts, United States. Fall Rivers population was 88,857 at the 2010 census, making it the tenth-largest city in the state.

Source: Public domain

Population: 56,826Percent Republican: 41.8%$ Republican Amount Per Capita: $1.38# Republican Contributions Per Capita: 0.0More on Taunton:Photos |Data

Taunton is a city in Bristol County, Massachusetts, United States, located approximately 40 miles south of Boston, 18 miles east of Providence, 10 miles north of Fall River, 20 miles north of New Bedford, and 25 miles west of Plymouth. It is the seat of Bristol County. Taunton is situated on the Taunton River which winds its way through the city on its way to Mount Hope Bay, 10 miles to the south. At the 2010 census, the city had a population of 55,874. Thomas Hoye Jr. is the current mayor of Taunton, and has held the position since 2012.

Population: 95,125Percent Republican: 41.8%$ Republican Amount Per Capita: $1.14# Republican Contributions Per Capita: 0.01More on New Bedford:Photos |Data

New Bedford is a city in Bristol County, Massachusetts, United States. As of the 2010 census, the city had a total population of 95,072, making it the sixth-largest city in Massachusetts. New Bedford is nicknamed The Whaling City because during the 19th century, the city was one of the most important, if not the most important, whaling ports in the world, along with Nantucket, Massachusetts and New London, Connecticut. The city, along with Fall River and Taunton, make up the three largest cities in the South Coast region of Massachusetts.

Population: 184,743Percent Republican: 40.4%$ Republican Amount Per Capita: $1.54# Republican Contributions Per Capita: 0.01More on Worcester:Photos |Data

Worcester pronunciation is a city and the county seat of Worcester County, Massachusetts, United States. Named after Worcester, England, as of the 2010 Census the citys population was 181,045, making it the second most populous city in New England after Boston. Worcester is located approximately 40 miles west of Boston, 50 miles east of Springfield and 40 miles north of Providence. Due to its location in Central Massachusetts, Worcester is known as the Heart of the Commonwealth, thus, a heart is the official symbol of the city. However, the heart symbol may also have its provenance in lore that the mass-produced Valentines Day card was invented in the city.

Source: Public domain

Population: 40,666Percent Republican: 40.4%$ Republican Amount Per Capita: $0.35# Republican Contributions Per Capita: 0.0More on Fitchburg:Photos |Data

Fitchburg is the third largest city in Worcester County, Massachusetts, United States. The population was 40,318 at the 2010 census. Fitchburg is home to Fitchburg State University as well as 17 public and private elementary and high schools.

Population: 16,858Percent Republican: 40.4%$ Republican Amount Per Capita: $1.61# Republican Contributions Per Capita: 0.0More on Southbridge Town:Photos |Data

The Town of Southbridge has a city form of government with a city council legislative body, but via a statute calls itself a Town. It is located in Worcester County, Massachusetts, United States. The population was 16,719 at the 2010 census. Southbridge is one of fourteen Massachusetts municipalities that have applied for, and been granted, city forms of government but wish to retain The town of- in their official names.

Source: Public domain

Population: 41,446Percent Republican: 40.4%$ Republican Amount Per Capita: $2.23# Republican Contributions Per Capita: 0.01More on Leominster:Photos |Data

Leominster is a city in Worcester County, Massachusetts, United States. It is the second-largest city in Worcester County, with a population of 40,759 at the 2010 census. Leominster is located north of Worcester and west of Boston. Both Route 2 and Route 12 pass through Leominster. Interstate 190, Route 13, and Route 117 all have starting/ending points in Leominster. Leominster is bounded by Fitchburg and Lunenburg to the north, Lancaster to the east, Sterling and Princeton to the south, and Westminster to the west.

Population: 20,496Percent Republican: 40.4%$ Republican Amount Per Capita: $0.55# Republican Contributions Per Capita: 0.0More on Gardner:Photos |Data

Gardner is a city in Worcester County, Massachusetts, United States. The population was 20,228 at the 2010 census. Gardner is home to Dunn State Park, Gardner Heritage State Park, Lake Wampanoag Wildlife Sanctuary, and Mount Wachusett Community College.

Next 10 Cities

Well there you have it, the places in Massachusetts that have the highest number of conservatives per capita, with Brockton ranking as the least conservative in the entire state.

If youre curious, here are the least conservative cities in Massachusetts:

For more Massachusetts reading, check out:

Share on Facebook

See the original post here:
These Are The 10 Most Conservative Cities In Massachusetts ...

Republican Representative Tom Reed, accused of misconduct, will retire – BetaBoston

U.S. Rep. Tom Reed, a Republican from western New York who was accused last week of rubbing a female lobbyists back and unhooking her bra without her consent in 2017, apologized to the woman on Sunday and announced that he will not run for reelection next year.

Reed, 49, said in a statement that the incident involving then-lobbyist Nicolette Davis occurred at a time in my life in which I was struggling. He said he entered treatment that year and realized he was powerless over alcohol.

Reed apologized to his wife and children, and to Davis, and said he planned to dedicate my time and attention to making amends for my past actions.

Reed, who was first elected to Congress in 2010, had been among the members of Congress calling for the resignation of Democratic Gov. Andrew Cuomo over sexual harassment allegations. In late February, Reed said he was seriously considering running for governor against Cuomo should the Democrat seek a fourth term next year.

Reed said in his statement Sunday that he would not seek any elective office in 2022.

The announcement came two days after The Washington Post reported the allegations from Davis, who was 25 and a lobbyist for insurer Aflac when she said Reed, seated next to her at a Minneapolis bar, unhooked her bra from outside her blouse and moved his hand to her thigh.

A drunk congressman is rubbing my back, she texted a co-worker at Aflac that evening, adding later, HELP HELP.

Reed released a statement Friday saying, This account of my actions is not accurate.

In his statement Sunday he said, " In reflection, my personal depiction of this event is irrelevant. Simply put, my behavior caused her pain, showed her disrespect and was unprofessional. I was wrong, I am sorry, and I take full responsibility.

A former mayor of Corning, New York, Reed is co-chair of the House of Representatives bipartisan Problem Solvers Caucus.

He voted against impeaching former President Donald Trump in January but voted in favor of certifying the 2020 election of Democrat Joe Biden.

Originally posted here:
Republican Representative Tom Reed, accused of misconduct, will retire - BetaBoston