Media Search:



Fleischer predicts Democrats will nix filibuster for gun control | TheHill – The Hill

Fox News contributor and former White House press secretary Ari Fleischer on Wednesday predicted that Senate Democrats will move to nix the Senate filibuster on gun reform legislationafter multiple deadly mass shootings.

During an interview on Foxs Americas Newsroom, Fleischer, who served under former President George W. Bushs administration, said that gun control is one of the issues at the core of the Democratic Party.

I think this is going to be an issue that breaks the Senate, he said. It is so deep and fervent inside the Democratic Party that gun control is the answer.

Fleischer went on to predict that Senate Democrats will break the filibuster over this, adding, I dont think they have any choice.

The base demands it, they demand action, they say thoughts and prayers are not enough, he continued. Theyre going to try to get through whatever they can get through on 50 votes, and this will be the issue that they challenge the filibuster over.

Co-host Bill Hemmer pointed out opposition to nixing the filibuster among moderate Democrats, particularly Sen. Joe ManchinJoe ManchinThe Hill's Morning Report - Biden tasks Harris on border; news conference today Democrats face questions over agenda Democrats divided on gun control strategy MORE (D-W.Va.), who told CNNon Tuesday that he would still advocate against it even if removing the rule would allow the passage of his bipartisan bill with Republican Sen. Pat ToomeyPatrick (Pat) Joseph ToomeySasse rebuked by Nebraska Republican Party over impeachment vote Philly GOP commissioner on censures: 'I would suggest they censure Republican elected officials who are lying' Toomey censured by several Pennsylvania county GOP committees over impeachment vote MORE (Pa.), which requires background checks on armed sales at gun shows and over the internet.

The bill goes short of mandating background checks in private transfers of firearms, which the broader House gun reform bills have included.

However, Fleischer said, Manchin also said he would only support a bipartisan COVID bill, and of course, there was a partisan COVID bill and he supported it.

Manchin is always an open question, he added. Im not sure I would take him at his word, particularly when the pressure mounts on the core issue that defines the modern day Democratic Party.

Fleischers remarks come amid growing support among Democrats to eliminate the 60-vote filibuster needed to end debate on legislation. Ending the practicewould return the Senate to a talking filibuster, in which senators need to physically be on the floor to block legislation

Senate Majority Leader Charles SchumerChuck SchumerOvernight Health Care: Senate confirms Levine for HHS, first openly transgender official | Progressives up pressure on Biden to back COVID vaccine patent waiver | Former Operation Warp Speed chief fired over sexual harassment allegations Mississippi GOP senator says it's wrong to vote on Sunday for religious reasons Senate confirms first openly transgender official, approving Levine for HHS MORE (D-N.Y.) has pledged to put forth a series of bills on the floor, which will likely force Democrats to take a position on removing the filibuster in order to move forward their desired policy proposals in the face of Republican opposition.

President Biden on Tuesday called on Congress to enact meaningful gun control legislation, including a ban on assault weapons and high-capacity magazines, as well as closing loopholes in background checks for firearms.

Bidens call for further reforms included a demand that the Senate immediately pass two bills approved by the House earlier this year that would expand background checks on gun sales, and Schumer has vowed to take action on the legislation.

Other lawmakers have signaled that they would support removing the filibuster in order to move forward a range of other legislative reforms.

Sen. Angus KingAngus KingSenators eye rollback of Trump methane rule with Congressional Review Act Manchin says Democrats should pay for infrastructure, raise corporate taxes Fleischer predicts Democrats will nix filibuster for gun control MORE (I-Maine) on Wednesday suggested he would support changing Senate rules should Republicans block voting rights legislation.

"All-out opposition to reasonable voting rights protections cannot be enabled by the filibuster; if forced to choose between a Senate rule and democracy itself, I know where I will come down," King wrote in an op-ed for The Washington Post.

Continue reading here:
Fleischer predicts Democrats will nix filibuster for gun control | TheHill - The Hill

‘This is not happening’: Carjacking victims’ fears are realized as Chicago fights to control the crime – Herald-Mail Media

CHICAGO One womans Honda Civic was taken when she was held at gunpoint while picking up her son at a day care center.

Another woman lost her Chevrolet Camaro after a day of shopping when she was pulled out of it and thrown to the ground and her key fob was ripped from its chain.

A ride-share drivers Ford Escape was stolen after he struggled with a customer he had asked not to eat in the back seat. After a scuffle, the driver held onto the car as it started moving, his knees scraping the pavement after he let go.

I was so upset when I saw that car being driven off, the driver, Phillip Sanchez, told the Chicago Tribune. My mind was freaking out.

These were among the hundreds of carjackings in Chicago already this year, brazen crimes that have frightened city residents and frustrated police, politicians and community leaders many of whom are already preoccupied with intractable violence that has given the city an unflattering reputation.

Through mid-March, there had been more than 370 carjackings in Chicago. Despite a dip during Februarys harsh winter weather, that figure was easily the most seen here during the same period in any year since at least 2001, crime statistics show.

And the result is a shaken city, where residents look over their shoulders more than usual and at least one alderman has gone so far as scheduling a special, secure event at a gas station so constituents could safely fill up.

The woman who was thrown to the ground as her Camaro was taken blamed herself for becoming a victim.

I knew this was happening a lot. I just wasnt paying attention, she told the Tribune in the moments after the carjacking. Its nerve-wracking. I think right now Im getting over the shock. Im just now like, I cant believe I was this dumb to just be sitting in my car.

The Tribune spent a few days earlier this month trying to find victims of carjackings in the hours or days after they occurred. Here are some of their stories.

I knew something was definitely wrong

One night earlier this month, police officers with flashlights walked along sidewalks and across front lawns on Kenwood Avenue in the Calumet Heights community on Chicagos South Side.

They pointed beams of light up and down the faces of townhouses and three-flats, looking for video cameras or possibly witnesses to help shed some light on how two women were carjacked on the block earlier in the evening.

One of the women gave the other a ride home to the block. The longtime friends, who asked not to be identified due to safety reasons, stood outside the passengers building as they gave information to an officer scribbling notes.

Im gonna pray for you! one neighbor called out to the women through her apartment window.

The two had pulled up on the block in a white Chevrolet Camaro after a day of clothes shopping. The driver was dropping off her friend, but the two began chatting before parting ways.

Thats when a gray vehicle pulled up alongside the Camaro and then in front of it, boxing it in and startling the women.

Theres four guys in there ... and they were all looking back at me, or us, in the car, the woman who had been behind the wheel of the Camaro recalled between moments of talking to police on the scene. And right then I knew something was definitely wrong, especially how close they were to my car.

She said everything happened fast. The gray vehicle came in quickly, and a group of younger men got out and were on them in no time.

And a few of them got out and theyre like, yelling, Get out of the car! the woman said.

They tried to pull her door open, she said of her friend, the passenger. The other ones came around to my side and yanked me out and pushed, threw me to the (ground). I had my keys to my chest on the (ground), and they started cursing at me, telling me, Give me the keys! Give me the keys!

She screamed hoping someone would hear, as one of the carjackers yelled that he would shoot her.

From what she remembers, one of them got in her Camaro and drove off, while the others left the block in the gray vehicle after taking the womens purses.

Officers lingered on the block for more than an hour. They spoke with the women periodically and eventually delivered more bad news.

Theyre trying to use my card? one woman asked an officer after learning the carjackers tried to use her bank card at a business on Ashland Avenue.

Later the same night, a 69-year-old man walked to his vehicle outside his home in the Beverly community, about seven miles southwest of where the two women were carjacked.

As he was about to head to work, a gray Ford Fusion pulled up and a couple of young men got out of the car.

Give me your money, (expletive), one of them said, according to authorities.

Before things went further, the man, who happened to be licensed to carry a gun, pulled out a pistol and fired two shots, striking one of the suspects, authorities said. The group then fled in the Ford.

About 15 minutes later, police about two miles away heard the call of the attempted robbery and spotted a quick flash of lights on 99th Street near Vincennes Avenue. Police saw a large smoke and dust cloud and followed it north, authorities said.

The Fusion crashed 11 blocks away into a pillar of a viaduct. The car was wrecked. Air bags deployed. The rear lights blinked as the horn blared intermittently.

The young men tried to get away. But they were arrested a short time later. One of them, a 17-year-old, had been shot in the right knee by the man with the gun.

The two other teenage boys, one 15 and the other 16, were escorted by police to two separate ambulances on the scene.

Police said they believe they know where the car the teens crashed came from. Many cars taken by force or stolen on the street wind up used in other crimes.

Just days earlier, Tyler Rasmuson had gone to meet a friend for dinner to celebrate a work promotion.

Rasmuson parked his gray 2016 Ford Fusion in the 800 block of West Blackhawk Street near his friends apartment, just north of downtown.

After the dinner, Rasmuson got calls from a stranger who tried him three times. It was a passer-by along Blackhawk Street who got his name and phone number off some dry cleaning that was scattered on the ground, along with a golf bag.

This person wanted to see if Rasmuson was OK. So Rasmuson met up with the caller and noticed his car was missing.

Had my keys with me. My car was gone. I had no freakin idea what was going on, he recalled in a telephone interview.

A day after Rasmusons Fusion crashed on the South Side, Phillip Sanchez had a costume for an acting gig and a bag with his iPad next to him in his 2020 Ford Escape.

The Lyft driver spent four months looking for the perfect car one with a rotary gear shift, a digital speedometer and in Sedona orange and finally got it in January. He also had waited through the pandemic for another acting role and finally got a call from the show Chicago P.D. to play a homeless man. He had his gray and black beard grown out for such a role.

The 56-year-old driver told the Tribune he was just doing bunny hop rides, or short rides that are barely a mile along, before he dropped off a passenger in scrubs at the University of Chicago Medical Center. He almost immediately got a notification for another ride, and picked up a young couple by the hospitals emergency entrance. They were his 10th ride of the day.

He asked the couple to put their seat belts on as the young woman was talking on the phone.

Sanchezs father had made two signs for his cars interior that were on the back of his headrests for passengers. One said, No Mask No Ride, as a pandemic precaution, and another read, No Snacking.

Still, the couple asked if they could stop for food, and Sanchez instructed them on how to add a side trip to their Lyft route. The two chose a nearby Wendys, and Sanchez pulled into the drive-thru.

Sanchez reminded the pair of his sign and the rule against snacking, he recalled, and things took an ugly turn.

Before he knew it, his male passenger was attacking him from behind, Sanchez recalled, punching him in the chest and his head.

I couldnt defend myself because of one, the position I was in, and two, I was locked in my seat belt, he said. In moments, the couple was out of the car, with the bag that held his iPad.

I freaked out. I thought, No, this is not happening, Sanchez said, quickly realizing the man had jumped behind the wheel of his car. He tried to hold on to the car as he was dragged a short distance through the Wendys parking lot.

He watched the pair drive off with the two new good things in his life: the costume and his new orange Escape.

Its like Im not meant to have anything nice in life. As soon as I have it, its pulled out of my hands, Sanchez said. This (expletive) proved I couldnt have it.

His car was found the next day, totaled, in suburban Calumet Park. Sanchez has called his insurance company but hes unable to work. A church he attends virtually has started raising money for him.

Many carjacking victims are Lyft and Uber drivers. Organizers with the Independent Drivers Guild said they believe some people use the apps to shop for victims and the apps make it easy for them to do so.

Several of the organizers held a news conference and candlelight vigil on March 9 to pray for two drivers who were seriously injured during recent carjackings.

Kevin Nelson, an organizer, said the guild estimates there are 120,000 to 150,000 drivers in the Chicago area.

People are able to exploit a security flaw in the app, Nelson said. People dont have to verify ID. They dont have to include selfies.

The drivers must verify themselves, and the passengers can see what kind of car they are driving, making it easy for would-be carjackers to wait for a vehicle they would like to take, organizers said. In a statement, Lyft said it is exploring the expansion of safety features to prevent these kinds of crimes.

In February, a 46-year-old driver was shot multiple times in the 3900 block of West Jackson Boulevard. One bullet lodged into his neck, paralyzing him.

Another driver was shot March 3 by his passenger in an attempted carjacking, according to Chicago police.

Mustafa Alawsi spoke at the news conference about being carjacked in early November.

He picked up passengers around 3 a.m. in the Ukrainian Village area. When they got in the car, Alawsi asked for a name to confirm the ride, but had a gun put to his head instead.

He got out, and they took his phone, money and everything that was with him, he said. His car was found 15 days later.

On March 14, four of the guild organizers including Nelson gathered at the ride-share drivers lot outside OHare International Airport.

Some drivers will pick up passengers only at the airports, organizers said, as a way to know that passengers likely do not have a weapon on them.

The guild organizers handed out flyers of a man police were looking for who is accused of raping and robbing an Uber driver.

Two of the drivers said they carry guns, and promised to take care of the man themselves if they saw him.

In Sanchezs carjacking, 19-year-old Najee Bursey was arrested March 12 in the Woodlawn neighborhood, according to Chicago police. He was charged with felony vehicular hijacking and misdemeanor theft.

Two of the teens arrested with Rasmusons Ford Fusion faced charges in Cook County Juvenile Court. A 15-year-old boy who was arrested with them could appear in court later in the spring.

Chicago police said they believe the teens may have also been responsible for taking the white Camaro from the two women on Kenwood Avenue on the same evening prior to the confrontation with the man who surprised them with a gun. But no charges have been filed in the carjacking of the two women.

The women told the Tribune they heard from police that at least one of their bank cards was found at the hospital in the pocket of the 17-year-old who was shot.

On March 11, the 17-year-old and the 16-year-old had their initial court hearings before Cook County Juvenile Court Judge Linda Perez. Both had been through the countys juvenile justice system before.

The 17-year-old who was shot was only charged with criminal trespassing, and the 69-year-old victim couldnt identify him as one of those who confronted him at his car. As it turned out, that teen had just appeared before Perez on another case hours before his arrest.

He appeared at his latest hearing over a video feed while still at Christ Hospital recovering from his bullet wound. The judges worries for him had been realized, she told the youth.

Now you need surgery for this bullet wound, Perez told the teen. Young man, you are in a world of trouble.

Just hours before Sanchezs harrowing experience at Wendys, Chicago police Superintendent David Brown announced at a news conference the debut of a new section of the Police Departments website that provides information about carjackings in the city.

The page includes surveillance video, booking photos of suspects and an outlet for the public to send tips.

Brown said suspects use carjacked vehicles to sell for parts and to commit other crimes, but the No. 1 reason for carjackings is joyriding.

Its a shame that youll hold a gun to someones head just to joyride, Brown said.

The Police Departments efforts to curtail carjackings have been an up-and-down affair.

After a spike in the crime in 2017, a task force was formed the following year. Officials credit it with reducing carjackings to their lowest level in several years.

But that task force, consisting of local, state and federal law enforcement, was sent to concentrate on other work when the number of carjackings dropped.

Chicago police Superintendent David Brown addresses reporters during a news conference to announce updates on a recently formed vehicular hijacking task force operation on March 10, 2021.

Chicago police Superintendent David Brown addresses reporters during a news conference to announce updates on a recently formed vehicular hijacking task force operation on March 10, 2021. (John J. Kim / Chicago Tribune)

In February 2020, not long before Brown took the department helm, Chicago saw another spike, a roughly 75% rise in carjackings during the first two months of that year. So CPD officials announced the restart of a task force to address the problem.

Brown has called the situation a national phenomenon, saying reasons for the spike include the fact that more juveniles have been on the street with time on their hands because of schools closed by the COVID-19 pandemic.

On March 12, two days after Brown spoke, a 21-year-old woman drove her Honda Civic into the small parking lot of the Illinois Institute for Children to pick up her 3-month-old son after work.

As she pulled into the lot at 10009 S. Yates Blvd. in the South Deering neighborhood, she saw a young man walking down the sidewalk.

She thought nothing of it. But as she parked just outside the day care center, the man came up to her door from behind.

She locked the doors and thought he might just be asking her for money, she told the Tribune moments later. But when he got to her window, he pulled out a gun and pointed it at her.

(Expletive), get out, he said.

Thats what she did, and he got in. He pulled out of the lot and went west down 100th Street.

I was scared, she said. I didnt know what to think.

The woman cried softly as she stood outside the day care center as beat officers called for a detective. Relatives came to help her, as she had her infant nestled in his carrier.

She shook her head. The next day was her birthday, she said.

At least she was OK and her son wasnt in the car, but she had just started a second job and now didnt have a way to get there. An officer walked up to her to give her an update on her car.

They put it in the system real quick because weve done so many of these, he said.

But a few days later, she still had heard nothing.

And she still didnt have a car.

(Chicago Tribune reporter Annie Sweeney contributed to this report.)

2021 Chicago Tribune. Visit at chicagotribune.com. Distributed by Tribune Content Agency, LLC.

The rest is here:
'This is not happening': Carjacking victims' fears are realized as Chicago fights to control the crime - Herald-Mail Media

Biden press conference: President stirs controversy on border, China and Trump and vows to run in 2024 – The Independent

Joe Biden says hell run for a second term in 2024

On the 65th day of his presidency, Joe Biden held his first formal press conference since entering the White House on 20 January.

In the hour-long Q&A, Biden courted controversy on migration at the Mexico border, the US relationship with China, and the potential to face off against Trump in 2024 in a rematch that see two oldest presidential candidates in US history (Biden 82 v Trump 78).

Of the 15 presidents of the past 100 years, all but for Biden have held a press conference within 33 days of being sworn into office. Donald Trump did it 27 days in, while Barack Obama outdid Trump by a week at 20 days.

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg dismissed the company's role in polarising the US, blaming the "political and media environment" for promoting extremism and misinformation. His opening statement in the Senate big tech hearing came after a cutout of the Facebook boss dressed as the QAnon Shaman Jacob Chansley appeared on Capitol Hill before Congress began grilling the social media platforms.

Kayleigh McEnany, former White House press secretary to Mr Trump, has meanwhile appeared on Fox News to claim Joe Biden is in badly declining health and is concealing his condition behind a Covid face mask, a baseless smear intended to undermine his first press conference as president, where questions on immigration, the coronavirus vaccine rollout, infrastructure and gun control are likely to be forthcoming.

His vice president, Kamala Harris, is also already facing criticism from Republicans Ted Cruz and Doug Ducey, Arizonas governor, after being appointed to lead the countrys response to the latest surge in asylum seekers arriving at the US border with Mexico as the administration struggles to find temporary housing for hundreds of unaccompanied children.

Read more:

Good morning and welcome to The Independents rolling coverage of the Joe Biden administration.

Joe Sommerlad25 March 2021 09:05

US vice president Kamala Harris will lead the countrys response to the latest surge in asylum seekers arriving at the US border with Mexico from Central America as it struggles to find temporary housing for hundreds of unaccompanied children.

The immigration portfolio is the first specific assignment Joe Biden has delegated to his deputy.

The presidents decision signals the administration is redoubling its efforts to address concerns about the thousands of migrant children in US government care, as the overwhelmed Homeland Security and Health and Human Services Departments manage a rapid increase in arrival numbers.

I asked her, the VP, today, because shes the most qualified person to do it, to lead our efforts with Mexico and the Northern Triangle, and the countries that can help, need help in stemming the movement of so many folks, stemming the migration to our southern border, Biden told reporters on Wednesday.

The veep had this to say about the immigration crisis on Monday - before (somewhat unwisely) laughing when asked whether she would visit the border, allowing conservative commentators to accuse her of refusing to take the issue seriously.

Griffin Connolly has this report.

Joe Sommerlad25 March 2021 09:15

The president will hold the first press session of his reign later today, 64 days on from his inauguration, with questions on immigration, the coronavirus vaccine rollout, infrastructure and gun control likely to be forthcoming.

Griffin Connolly has this on the key issues.

Joe Sommerlad25 March 2021 09:45

The Biden administration is reportedly mulling new executive orders to reform firearm ownership laws in the wake of two deadly mass shootings in Atlanta, Georgia, and Boulder, Colorado, within the last week.

The president is not waiting for anything to fail in Congress, his press secretary Jen Psaki told reporters on Wednesday.

Alex Woodward has the latest.

Joe Sommerlad25 March 2021 10:15

Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell says he hasnt spoken with the president since his inauguration on 20 January.

McConnell complained that Democrats are not interested in bipartisan cooperation (which is pretty rich coming from the Grim Reaper himself) during an interview with Bill Hemmer on Fox News on Wednesday in which he revealed: I dont believe I have spoken with him since he was sworn in. We had a couple of conversations before that.

But that appears not to be true.

Oliver OConnell was watching.

Joe Sommerlad25 March 2021 10:45

The president looks likely to run for two terms after all, according to one of his advisers, despite campaigning on being a "transitional" president and wresting power away from Donald Trump with the aim of handing it over to a younger successor.

On the campaign trail in March 2020, Biden said: Look, I view myself as a bridge, not as anything else. Theres an entire generation of leaders you saw stand behind me. They are the future of this country.

That bridge now appears to have been extended.

One longtime adviser was asked byThe Hill whether the president had had second thoughts about the duration of his tenure and answered: I dont think theres any reason to say that he wont.

This is particlarly good news for comedy legend Dana Carvey, who has just perfected his Biden impersonation and debuted it on Stephen Colberts chat show.

Gustaf Kilander has more on the prospect of Biden running again in 2024 at the age of 81.

Joe Sommerlad25 March 2021 11:15

The Texas senator and Cancun holidaymaker has sneered at Joe Biden tasking Kamala Harris with tackling the immigration crisis at the US-Mexico border, picking up on a almost two-year-old tweet to challenge her to allow the media to film the empty cages when children have been released from US Custom and Border Protection facilities.

Cruzs attack is part of a predictable bad faith attack from Republicans calling for greater transparency from the administration on temporary containment facilities - as though the zero tolerance policies of Donald Trump never happened.

Doucy Ducey, Arizonas governor, has meanwhile called her the worst possible choice to take on the situation.

Joe Sommerlad25 March 2021 11:45

Another Trumpista with a conveniently short memory is the ex-presidents former press secretary, now a pundit at Fox News, who was accused of lying several times at the podium during her White House tenure despite overtly promising the lobby she would never do so.

Here she is with the bare-faced cheek to attack Biden for a lack of transparency ahead of his press conference.

Joe Sommerlad25 March 2021 12:05

Jen Psaki said during her daily briefing on Wednesday that the employees lost their jobs after a review that also raised other security issues.

She added that Biden had not stepped in to prevent the firings over admissions of past drug use because, although decriminalised in some states, cannabis remains illegal federally.

What we tried to do as an administration was work with the security service who actually make these determinations about the suitability for serving in government, Psaki said.

In the past, and I served in the Obama-Biden administration when the rules were actually far more stringent, so that is not about anyones personal point of view it is about working through the process and the history and modernising it and taking steps to address the fact that marijuana is legal in a number of states across the country but it is still illegal federally, right? We know that.

Joe Sommerlad25 March 2021 12:35

The US Department of Agriculture has announced the end of a Trump-era policy that could have stripped federal food benefits from over a million people during the pandemic by imposing stricter working requirements on those reliant on the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Programme (SNAP).

A federal court allowed new agriculture secretary Tom Vilsack to withdraw the preceding administrations appeal against an earlier ruling blocking the policy change.

We are pleased to finally put to rest a policy that would have restricted the ability of states to provide nutrition assistance to able-bodied adults without dependents (ABAWDs) during times of high unemployment, Vilsack said in a statement.

The rule would have penalised individuals who were unable to find consistent income, when many low-wage jobs have variable hours, and limited to no sick leave.

Groups with typically higher unemployment, including rural Americans, Black, Indigenous, Hispanic and People of Color, and those with less than a high school education would have been disproportionately harmed by this cruel policy.

The move was applauded by his colleagues.

Joe Sommerlad25 March 2021 13:05

Go here to see the original:
Biden press conference: President stirs controversy on border, China and Trump and vows to run in 2024 - The Independent

Supreme Court poised to jump into Second Amendment disputes, as nation mourns mass shootings – USA TODAY

Boulder, Colorado mourns the ten people murdered during a shooting rampage inside a King Soopers grocery store. USA TODAY

WASHINGTON With Republicans and Democrats already speeding toward a familiar stalemate over whether to respond to a recent spate of mass shootings, experts on both sides of the debate are predicting the Supreme Court is poised to expand Second Amendment rightsafter a decade-long hiatus from the issue.

The only question, several court observers said, is when.

From a challenge to New York's restrictions on carrying firearms outside a home to cases involving lifetime gun ownership bans for people convicted of certain crimes, the court's months-old 6-3 conservative majority will soon have a number of high-profile opportunities tojumpinto the turbulentnational debate over gun rights.

Four conservative justices alreadysignaled a desire to address outstanding Second Amendment questions, but it's not clear if the recent shootings in Colorado and Georgia will temper that enthusiasm.President Joe Biden has called for a federal responseto the killings and several Republican lawmakers have dismissed the need for stronger gun laws. The court, led by Chief Justice John Roberts, has sometimes beenhesitant to jump into Washington's raging political battles.

More: Amy Coney Barrett steers the Supreme Court to the right

But even if the court delays, few expect it to wait for long.

"There's no doubt that the Supreme Court is poised to take a Second Amendment case soon," saidAdam Winkler, author of "Gunfight: The Battle over the Right to Bear Arms in America" and a UCLA School of Law professor. "There's no doubt that there's a majority of justices on the court now who've expressed the desire."

Eight people were killed, including six Asian American women, in a series of shootings March 16 at Atlanta-area spas and massage parlors. Ten people were killed days later in a mass shooting at a supermarket in Boulder, Colorado. The mass killings have quickly snapped Washington's attention back to the deeply partisan gun debate after the issue was sidelined during the coronavirus pandemic.

Local courts: Gun groups findsuccess in blocking local firearm controls

Pause: Supreme Court sidesteps major Second Amendment case, a setback for NRA

The nation's highest court has skirted Second Amendment disputes sinceissuing blockbuster rulings in 2008 and 2010 that struck down gun restrictions in theDistrict of Columbia and Chicago. The justices more recently considered a New York Cityprohibition on gun owners transporting firearms to ranges or second homes outside of the city, but dropped the matter after local officials rolled the regulation back.

Supporters of gun control and firearm safety measures hold a protest rally outside the Supreme Court as the court hears oral arguments in State Rifle and Pistol v. City of New York, NY, in Washington, D.C., on December 2, 2019.(Photo: SAUL LOEB, AFP via Getty Images)

But the dynamic has changed since Associate Justice Amy Coney Barrett joined the benchin October. While conservatives previously had the four votes needed to take a case, it wasn't clear whetherRoberts would deliver the fifth vote needed to corral a majority of the nine for a win. Now, with Barretton the court, several experts said, Roberts' vote is no longer as pivotal as it once was.

"While the Supreme Court in the past has held off on taking up Second Amendment cases, we have four justices who have said they're eager to do so and it also appears likely that Justice Barrett is with them," saidHannah Shearer, litigation director at the Giffords Law Center to Prevent Gun Violence. "They're not going to wait forever."

And that has raised alarms for gun control advocates.

Mourners shield the flames of their candles from the wind at a vigil for the victims of a mass shooting at a grocery store earlier in the week, Wednesday, March 24, 2021, outside the courthouse in Boulder, Colo. (Photo: David Zalubowski, AP)

Asserting that the court erred when it threw out the claim over New York City's gun transport rule last year, conservative Justices Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas and Neil Gorsuch wrotein a dissent that the rule was unconstitutional.Associate Justice Brett Kavanaugh agreed to drop the matter but said lower courts may be misapplying the court's precedents and called on his colleagues to "address that issue soon."

Five months after that decision, liberal Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburgdied, further shifting the balance of the court to the right.

Barrett, who drew headlines during her confirmation hearing for telling senators her family ownsa gun, has given Second Amendment advocates reason to cheer in the past. In 2019, as a judge on the federal appeals court in Chicago, Barrett dissented from an opinion upholding a law that bans convicted felons from owning a gun.

The Wisconsin man who challenged the law,Rickey Kanter, had previously pleaded guilty to one count of mail fraud. Barrett wrote in her dissent that the ban went too far when applied to someone who had not been convicted of a violent crime.

"History is consistent with common sense: It demonstrates that legislatures have the power to prohibit dangerous people from possessing guns," she wrote. "But that power extends only to people who are dangerous. Founding-era legislatures did not strip felons of the right to bear arms simply because of their status as felons."

President Donald Trump granted Kanter a pardon in December.

Two similar questions are now awaiting consideration at the Supreme Court. In one, a Pennsylvania man who pleaded guilty to driving under the influence in 2005 is challenging the ban on purchasing or owning a gun. In another, a Pennsylvania woman who pleaded guilty to making a false statement on her tax returns sued over the ban.

The court hasn't yet decided whether to take the cases.

The justices struck down handgun bans in the District of Columbia and Chicago in2008 and 2010. The landmark, 5-4decision in District of Columbia v. Hellerspecifically nodded to the right to own a gun for lawful purposes,likeself-defense within the home.The late Associate Justice Antonin Scalia, who wrote that opinion, nevertheless suggested that there were limits to the Second Amendment.

"Handguns are the most popular weapon chosen by Americans for self-defense in the home, and a complete prohibition of their use is invalid," he wrote at the time.

Since then the court has let stand aChicago suburb'ssemiautomatic weapons banand a variety of prohibitions againstcarrying guns in public, from New Jersey to California. It hasrefused to second-guess age limits for carrying guns in Texas andrequirements for disabling or locking up guns when not in use in San Francisco.

Now the court has another opportunity to probe the limits Scaliaalluded toin theHellerdecision. Anew round of litigation over how far states may go to restrictthe right to carry guns outside a homehaspercolatedup through the courts.

The California-based U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit on Wednesdayupheld a Hawaii gun regulation that limits the ability of people to openlycarry guns in public, a suit that appears destined to eventually make its way to the Supreme Court.

Autoplay

Show Thumbnails

Show Captions

The Supreme Court already has a similar dispute on its docket from New York State. In the first major Second Amendment case to come before the court since Barrett joined, two residents sought a license to carry guns outside their home but were denied because they didn't meet the state's requirement of having a "special need for self protection" above and beyond what's required by the general public.

They sued, arguing the state requirement is so onerous that it excludesvirtually everyone from carrying a gun. The New York-based federal appeals court disagreed, pointing to an earlier decision in 2012 in which the judges acknowledged a deep lack of clarity about what Scalia's 2008 decision in Hellermeant for guns outside a home.

"What we know from these decisions is that Second Amendment guarantees are at their zenith within the home," the court wrote at the time. "What we do not know is the scope of that right beyond the home and the standards for determining when and how the right can be regulated by a government."

It's that uncertainty that makes the New York regulation ripe for consideration, said Josh Blackman, a law professor at South Texas College of Law Houston. The court has managed to avoidthe issue for years,he noted, "but now we have a different court."

The justices are expected to discuss for the first timewhether to take the New York suitwhen they meet privately on Friday. It's not clear when the court might make a decision on whether to take the appeal.

"The issue has been floating around for nearly a decade and the court should answer the question, and the answer is either 'yes' or 'no,'"Blackmansaid. "All the pieces are there."

But the court has managed to step around major controversies in recent weeks, including on abortion, the 2020 election and immigrationpoliciesfrom the Trump administration. It could easily do so again with the pending gun cases.

The nation remains deeply divided over guns. Two-thirds of Americans back tougher gun laws, a recent USA TODAY/Ipsos Poll found, but Republican support has fallen significantly as the issue takes on a stronger partisan cast than it did a few years ago.

Poll: Americans back tougher gun laws, but GOP support plummets, poll finds

But the court also has time: Anycaseitdecides totakenow would not likely be argued until the fall. And that would almost certainly pusha decision back until next year. By then, the scorching debate over how to respond to the recent shootings inGeorgia and Colorado may be over.

"Everyone speculates on what may influence the court" on whether to take a case, said Stephen Halbrook,a senior fellow at the Independent Institute and an attorneywho has represented the National Rifle Association. "We dont really know whether a recent mass murder would be a factor regarding the courts willingness to take on a Second Amendment case."

Autoplay

Show Thumbnails

Show Captions

Read or Share this story: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/2021/03/26/second-amendment-supreme-court-poised-take-guns-rights-cases/6979460002/

Follow this link:
Supreme Court poised to jump into Second Amendment disputes, as nation mourns mass shootings - USA TODAY

Second Amendment And Gun Control Debated On Twitter Is Social The Place To Have This Discussion? – Forbes

BOULDER, CO - MARCH 22: Tactical police units respond to the scene of a King Soopers grocery store ... [+] after a shooting on March 22, 2021 in Boulder, Colorado. Dozens of police responded to the afternoon shooting in which at least one witness described three people who appeared to be wounded, according to published reports. (Photo by Chet Strange/Getty Images)

On Tuesday morning the hashtags #EnoughIsEnough and #SecondAmendment were trending and each had more than 30,000 tweets while there were an equal number of posts related to the topic of "Well Regulated" another reference to the wording of the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution.

All of this was of course in response to the most recent mass shooting on Monday inside a grocery store in Boulder, Colorado. Ten people were killed, including a veteran police officer. As of Tuesday morning the motives remain unclear.

Across social media, especially Twitter, many users made their opinion quite clear.

"We aren't numb - over 90% of Americans support stronger gun laws. It's a handful of US Senators beholden to the gun lobby who have refused to act. The Second Amendment wasn't meant to be a suicide pact," posted Shannon Watts (@shannonrwatts), founder of @MomsDemand action.

On the other side of the issue, the NRA (@NRA) responded by sharing the wording of the Second Amendment, "A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed."

Anti-social Response

The responses that followed on Monday evening and Tuesday morning were anything but social. Many users called for greater gun control, casting blame at Republican lawmakers, while supporters of the Second Amendment blamed mental illness.

As with so many issues, both sides dug in and offered sharp and concise opinions. The issue of "Well Regulated" as in the well regulated militia, wasn't so much debated but rather a read through shows that it was an echo chamber. Many who see that the wording is to mean a government-regulated military force, akin to the National Guard, repeated that argument.

Across social media the opinions of the Founding Fathers was debated; and those who are opposed to firearms and the Second Amendment clearly see this as an opportunity to push for greater gun control, while supporters of the Second Amendment seemed as determined to make their counter arguments.

But the question must be asked whether any of this is remotely productive?

"Social media discussions are primarily about reaffirming your identity in a group," explained Dr. Matthew J. Schmidt, PhD, associate professor of national security and political science at the University of New Haven.

While today the discussion is about the Second Amendment, similarly hostile discourse has been seen for any hot button issue and people seem unwilling to even listen. The posts on social media don't seem to be aimed at changing opinions, but rather reaffirming one's point of view.

"Everyone has been cooped up for months, and we're living through the most tumultuous time in history, so for some people they just want their voices heard even if no one is actually listening," said technology futurist and brand strategist Scott Steinberg.

"Social media is a great platform to do just that right now," Steinberg added. "People aren't actually going to social media to have productive casual conversations. They tune into more to be part of crowd in fiery debates and hear from those that have similar opinions."

This is absolutely true of any issue and isn't limited to gun control or support for the Second Amendment.

"I doubt the issue of gun control will find resolution on social media, and it's now a well-established fact that social media tend to have a polarizing effect on most topics," said Mike Lawlor, associate professor of criminal justice at the Henry C. Lee College of Criminal Justice and Forensic Sciences at University of New Haven.

"That being said, social media does present the most user-friendly platform for grass roots organizing," said Lawlor. "You saw that in the post-Parkland 'March for Our Lives' event and organization."

Different Topic Same Responses

In many ways social media has allowed people to feel like they are part of a group or movement, even if the debate isn't all that social.

"Think of it as shouting into the void there is something cathartic about that," said Steinberg. "People need a forum right now. The downside is that because there are two sides of every issue it becomes very polarizing."

Steinberg added that we'd have to get back to a baseline where we agree to listen to one another before we can have any chance of having a meaningful debate, and that is unlikely to happen given the tone and open hostility.

"People use language that signals their strong belief in the ideas of their own group and some people attack the other side by way of reaffirming their own position as fighters in the culture war," added Schmidt. "This kind of speech starts to look like sectarian warfare. It's not reasoned debate designed to reconcile differences or find spaces of compromise. And conducting these arguments on platforms other than social media is unlikely to resolve any differences. People have picked their sides and very, very few will change."

Given that fact there is little chance that social media will result in any social change.

"There are, of course, two extremes in this debate," said Lawlor. "But there is also a soft, persuadable middle.Those without critical thinking skills will fall victim to conspiracy theories and paranoia.Those will critical thinking skills will focus on the events surrounding yesterday's shooting and consider whether reasonable steps could have been taken to prevent it or at least make it less likely. Each one of these tragedies is a teachable moment.Our challenge is to present the facts and analysis and hope people are willing to listen."

More here:
Second Amendment And Gun Control Debated On Twitter Is Social The Place To Have This Discussion? - Forbes