Media Search:



The Republican Poseurs Who Claim to Be True Texans – The New Republic

Yettheres little evidence these transplants are the sole, or even the driving,cause of Texass approaching swing-state status. As the Houston Press wrote last year, It is utter nonsenseto assume that every person coming here is some wide-eyed socialist hippie whodreams of high taxes and replacing Whataburgers with soy patties. Another write-up noted that it wassignificantly reductive to ascribe Texass leftward lurch to these new arrivals.

Indeed,theres a kind of cognitive dissonance at play in the Texas rights claim thatthe sole reason for the states political shift is wayward Californians. Afterall, shouldnt these uprooted Californians be fleeing the supposedly failedsocialist policies in California? Why would they be bringing these left-leaningpolicies with them? Are California politicians secretly plotting to spread theseeds of socialism wherever the roots of liberty run deep?

Thiswillingness to pin Texass political changes on an influx of liberals acts as akind of cover, or an excuse, for a state Republican Party unwilling to face newgenerations and demographics of Texans disgusted by the partys Trumpian turn.Younger Texans, nonwhite Texans, second-generation Americans whose immigrantparents selected Dallas and Houston and El Paso as the place to raise theirfamilyall of these contingents are increasingly sloughing off the outdated imagesof Texas that prep schoolers like Roy and Rodimer cling to. Its these true-nativeTexans who are refashioning those tiredtropes,all while steering the state leftward, toward a more multiethnic polity aimedsquarely against the authoritarian rot at the heart of the Texas RepublicanParty.

Buttheres one more irony at the heart of these far-right transplants attemptingto claim the mantle of Texanness. When the state first began convulsing towardindependence in the 1830s, the states residents broke into two camps. On theone end was a multiracial cohort composed of older Anglos and most of thestates Tejanos, content to remain within the anti-slavery republic of Mexico.On the other end was a contingent of young, transplanted Anglos, comprising theso-called War Party.

Read the original:
The Republican Poseurs Who Claim to Be True Texans - The New Republic

County Republican Party is the latest example of a culture that professes to want women in leadership, but fails to stand up for them – Salt Lake…

Theres been a concerted push over the last few years to encourage more women to run for elected office, with punchy slogans like Real women run and events and training aimed at supporting female candidates.

Its a worthy endeavor. Despite those efforts, Utah still ranks 40th in the proportion of female representatives at the state legislative level, and women remain underrepresented at other tiers of government, as well.

We got a demonstration of why thats the case over the last several days, as more than a half dozen Republican women came forward about a toxic, abusive culture perpetuated by the leaders of the Salt Lake County Republican Party.

As my colleague Leia Larsen reported, the partys communications consultant, Dave Robinson, had engaged in a months-long pattern of degrading and disparaging these women, making sexually inappropriate and objectifying comments, and threatening to ruin them if he didnt get his way.

Some examples:

Salt Lake County Council candidate Laurie Stringham said in September that Robinson mocked a campaign video she had produced and made sexually inappropriate comments to her.

He tells me if I want to wh--- myself out, that is my choice, Stringham said.

Recorder candidate Erin Preston said Robinson commented on her breasts and backside and had been threatening toward her.

And Councilwoman Aimee Winder Newton raised concerns about Robinsons behavior going back to last summer, Robinson co-authored an email where, among other things, he questioned Newtons sexuality and that of her family.

When all of these women and others took their complaints to County GOP Chairman Scott Miller, he blew them off, telling them thats just how Robinson acts and that they need to get thicker skins.

But Miller wasnt alone in his indifference, a point Stringham drove home in a statement Tuesday evening. After Miller ignored her concerns, Stringham said, It was also immediately reported to other elected officials. Yet it continued and increased.

Stringham specifically told Larsen in an interview that she had discussed Robinson with Councilman Richard Snelgrove. Preston also told me Tuesday she had emailed Snelgrove about the matter and that other party officials knew of the behavior, as well.

After these women and others spoke to The Tribune about Robinsons abuse, rather than apologizing, Miller excused Robinsons actions and attacked the victims, accusing them of trying to sabotage his bid for Utah Republican Party chairman.

Are most of the accusers sore losers who failed to win their respective races? Miller wrote in an incendiary email to county party delegates. Is this an attempt to disrupt my efforts to become the Utah GOP Chairman? I will not be CANCELLED.

There it is, right on cue. The cancel culture excuse that, as I wrote a few weeks ago, has become the most popular dodge to avoid accountability for reprehensible behavior. You call it getting cancelled, everyone else calls it the consequences you deserve.

Miller resigned his party post Sunday, a day after The Tribune story ran and in the face of widespread criticism from Republican leaders, including Gov. Spencer Cox and Lt. Gov Deidre Henderson, who condemned Millers indifference and victim-blaming.

Let us be clear: This type of behavior should never happen and when it does we will not tolerate it, ignore it, or explain it away, they said in a joint statement. It is unacceptable.

On Tuesday, the party announced it was forming an ethics committee in the wake of the allegations.

Robinsons mistreatment of these women is obviously shocking and reprehensible and also completely believable to anyone who knows his track record.

Salt Lake County Republican officials called for him to be fired back in 2018, after he blamed the lifestyle LGBTQ youth live, including grundles of sex, for their high suicide rate. (This, remember, is from the county partys communications pro.)

For whatever reason, Miller refused to cut ties with Robinson then, and stuck with him until the end despite being warned again and again of his behavior.

In the face of this debacle Miller is plowing ahead with his campaign for state party chairman, hoping to take his colossally failed leadership to the state level.

In a way, Im glad he is. It gives Republican state delegates a clear opportunity to either condone the unconscionable behavior, or to categorically rebuke Miller and his sidekick and send a clear message that his kind of indifference will not be tolerated.

But lets not pretend this is just a Republican problem. In 2017, several women made similar allegations of abuse and harassment against a candidate for state Democratic Party chairman and the response was bungled as bad, if not worse.

And this boorish behavior is by no means limited to politics.

If youre a woman you know this already and, if youre a man and havent heard the stories of unwanted comments and hostile encounters from your female friends or colleagues, you need to start paying closer attention.

This is a societal problem and it stems from two fundamental failures: First, the failure of certain men, drunk on self-importance and privilege, believing they are somehow entitled to behave like knuckle-dragging fools.

Second, its a failure of those in power overwhelmingly men who lack the clarity or courage or compassion to make clear that abuse in any setting will not be tolerated.

We cant have a climate conducive to elevating women to leadership whether in politics or the boardroom if they are simultaneously being subjected to an abusive environment lacking the structural supports and safeguards to prevent boorish behavior and punish the perpetrators.

Until we get to that point, the high-minded rhetoric about valuing women and their contributions will continue to ring hollow.

See original here:
County Republican Party is the latest example of a culture that professes to want women in leadership, but fails to stand up for them - Salt Lake...

Could we need a ‘vaccine passport’ to attend a ball game or concert? Wisconsin GOP lawmakers want to make sure that doesn’t happen – Milwaukee Journal…

The idea of a so-called vaccine passport to attend professional basketballgames orbook a cruise vacation is being embraced in some areas of the country and abroad.(Photo: Getty)

MADISON Two Republican lawmakers want to bar private businesses and the Evers administration from requiring Wisconsinites to show they are vaccinated against COVID-19 as the state searches for a post-pandemic life.

The idea of a so-called vaccine passport to attend professional basketballgames orbook a cruise vacation without fear of creating a COVID-19 outbreakis being embraced in some areas of the country and abroad.

Rep. Gae Magnafici of Dresser and Sen. Rob Stafsholt of New Richmond are proposing legislationthat aims to prevent such a program to be implemented in Wisconsin by barring government officials and business owners from discriminating based on whether they havereceived a vaccine against COVID-19, or areable to show proof of being vaccinated.

"This legislation is not about whether people should get the vaccine. Anyone that wants to get vaccinatedshould get vaccinated," Stafsholt wrote in a memo to colleagues on Thursday seeking support for the legislation. "This legislation is about preventing government overreach."

"When the panic over COVID-19 fades away, people are going to begin to return to normal life. As a way to make their patrons feel 'safe,'some businesses will begin to discriminate against those who have not or cannot be vaccinated by requiring proof of vaccination," Magnafici said in a separate memo.

Track COVID and the vaccine in Wisconsin: Track the latest data on cases, deaths and our pace on vaccines

Wisconsin vaccine FAQ: Who's eligible, where to get it and what's next

Gae Magnafici (R - Dresser)(Photo: Wisconsineye Live Stream)

New Yorkers began using a first-in-the-nation taxpayer-fundedapp this week called the Excelsior Pass that will be accepted at large-scale venues like Madison Square Garden and other entertainment venues.The app is free to businesses and anyone with vaccination records or test results in New York.

Wisconsin-based Epic Systems, Mayo Clinic, Microsoft and other private and public organizations created a coalition called the Vaccine Credential Initiative, which would help create a digital record of vaccination status and produce a set of guidelines that a company or nonprofit could use to create a digital vaccine passport.

"Individuals can then use those verifiable credentials for medical purposes and to demonstrate their health status to safely return to work, school, travel and life," the coalition said on its website.

State Sen. Rob Stafsholt, R-New Richmond, is shown during the state Senate session Tuesday, March 16, 2021, at the Capitol in Madison, Wis.(Photo: Mark Hoffman / Milwaukee Journal Sentinel)

Aides to Senate Majority Leader Devin LeMahieu and Assembly Speaker Robin Vos, who control which legislation moves forward, did not immediately say whether they supported the ideas. A spokeswoman for Evers also did not immediately say whether Evers would sign the bills if they made it to his desk.

Tim Sheehy, president of the Metropolitan Milwaukee Chamber of Commerce, said a debate over vaccine passports is premature because Israel is the only country seriously looking at a widespread program.

Sheehy said the idea raises many questions that deal with privacy, medical records and efficacy.

"The current (paper) cards have only a signature but nothing else to verify. So I dont think a 'vaccine passport'is on the front burner for businesses and their employees or customers," Sheehy said.

Amy Fairchild, a historian and ethicist at Ohio State University, said the biggest challenges with the idea of a digital vaccine passport will be cultural, not technological.

She said just as many Americans have resisted wearing masks during the pandemic, some will reject the idea of showing proof of vaccinationsto get into a ballgame orsee a concert.

Wisconsin lawmakers have been divided along party lines for a year over whether health officials and business owners should require face masks to limit the spread of COVID-19, previewing what kind of fight could emerge if the same kind of requirements appeared forvaccinations.

Karen Weintraub and Elizabeth Weise ofUSA TODAY contributed to this report.

You can find out who your legislators are and how to contact them here.

Contact Molly Beckat molly.beck@jrn.com. Follow her on Twitter at @MollyBeck.

Our subscribers make this reporting possible. Please consider supporting local journalism by subscribing to the Journal Sentinel at jsonline.com/deal.

Read or Share this story: https://www.jsonline.com/story/news/politics/2021/04/01/two-gop-lawmakers-seek-bar-vaccine-passports-wisconsin/4840575001/

Read more:
Could we need a 'vaccine passport' to attend a ball game or concert? Wisconsin GOP lawmakers want to make sure that doesn't happen - Milwaukee Journal...

S1 slammed as ‘political corruption’ as Republicans go all-in on attacking Dems’ election reform bill – Fox News

Republicansare launching a full-court press against the congressional Democrats wide rangingelectionand campaign finance reform bill.

"Its political corruption," the announcer charges in a new commercial that is part ofa major ad blitzby the National Republican Senatorial Committee starting Monday. "Stop the grab. Stop the fraud."

SCHUMER, MCCONNELL, SPAR OVER DEMOCRATS ELECTION BILL DURING RARE COMMITTEE SHOWDOWN

The Senate GOP reelection arm is spending seven figures to run the spots in Arizona, Georgia, Nevadaand New Hampshire, four states they hope to flip from blue to red in the 2022 midterms, when Republicans will aim to win back the majority in both the Senate and the House of Representatives.

In a memo and video released on Monday, NRSC chair Sen. Rick Scott spotlighted a new poll commissioned by the committee to target the measure.

"The bills disguised as election reform, but its really just a dishonest Democrat power grab. You also have to know if you oppose the Democrat power grab, Democrats will call you a racist. The good news is this, the American people dont buy that and theyre on our side," Scott argued.

The bill formally known as the "For the People Act," or as H.R.1 in the House and S.1 in the Senate passed the Democratic-controlled House earlier this month along party lines.

While it now faces an uncertain future in the equally divided Senate, where Democrats in the chamber say it will be a top priority when the Senate session resumes in early April,it is unifying Republicans in opposition.

Longtime Republican operative and strategist Colin Reed said ofthe measure: "To me, feels like a messaging bill that the Democrats are putting forward that doesnt really have a chance at becoming law. But it gives Republicans something to rally around and unite and move the conversation forward into the future."

IOWA'S GOP GOV. TIES HOUSE ELECTION SHOWDOWN TO DEMOCRATS' PUSH FOR MASSIVE REFORM BILL

Congressional Republicans have been railing against the legislation for weeks. And GOP leaders outside of Washington are also taking aim. Republican Gov. Kim Reynolds of Iowa warned that "state election law would be wiped away" if the Democrats bill becomes law. And Mike Pompeo, secretary of state during the Trump administration and a potential 2024 GOP presidential hopeful, charged in Iowa on Friday that the measure is a "raw power grab."

Voters deliver their ballot to a polling station, Tuesday, Nov. 3, 2020, in Tempe, Ariz. (AP Photo/Matt York)

The NRSC isnt alone in spending big bucks to target the bill.

Heritage Action for America, the nonprofit advocacy wing of the influential conservative think tank, recently launched a $10 million push that includes messaging to block what it calls "federal overreach" in the legislation.

Conservative groups such as the Susan B. Anthony List, the American Principles Project, the Tea Party Patriots, as well as Republican Attorney Generals Association, have also ignited efforts to take aim at the bill.

Reed, a Republican presidential and Senate campaign veteran, said the Democrats bill gives Republicans "a chance to find some targets that are juicy to the base and will allow them to be on offense as opposed to reacting to news of the day. They can lay the blame for all the atrocious things in H.R.1 atBiden, Pelosi, andSchumers feet and try to make next year a referendum on them as opposed to having to project a vision of their own."

Democrats highlight that their bill would "improve access to the ballot box" by creating automatic voter registration across the countryand by ensuring that individuals who have completed felony sentences have their full voting rights restored. The bill wouldalso expand early voting and enhance absentee voting by simplifying voting by mail. There was a surge in absentee voting during last years primaries and general election due to health concerns of in-person voting at polling stations amid the coronavirus pandemic.

20 STATE AGS DENOUNCE DEMOCRATS HR1 AS UNCONSTITUTIONAL

The measure also commits Congress to deliver "full congressional voting rights and self-government for the residents of the District of Columbia, which only statehood can provide," prohibits voter roll purges and aims to end "partisan gerrymandering" of congressional districts.

If passed into law, the bill would also enhance federal support for voting system security, increase oversight of election system vendors, upgrade online political ad disclosure and require all organizations involved in political activity to disclose their large donors, create a multiple matching system for small-dollar donations, which would be paid for by a new surcharge on "corporate law breakers and wealthy tax cheats," tighten rules on super PACs, and beef up the enforcement powers of the Federal Election Commission.

Republicans slam the measuresaying it would lead to a federal government takeover of elections andaccuse Democrats of trying to change election rules to benefit themselves. But Democrats say the measure is needed to combat the push by GOP lawmakers in some states where Republicans control the governors office and the legislature to pass bills that would tighten voting laws, which Democrats characterize as voter suppression.

A controversial bill that tightens voting access rules was signed into law on Thursday by Republican Gov. Brian Kemp of Georgia.

Earlier this month in Iowa, Reynolds signed into law a bill that shortens the early voting period from 29 to 20 days and requires that most absentee ballots be received, rather than just postmarked, by Election Day.

The current push by Republicans state lawmakers to beef up what they call election integrity was ignited by then-President Trumps repeated claims ahead of last Novembers election that the loosening of restrictions on voting by mail would lead to "massive voter fraud" and "rigged" elections.

After his defeat to President Biden, Trump falsely said that the election was "stolen" as he unsuccessfully tried to upend Bidens victory. Recent polling indicates that election integrity remains a major concern for Republican voters.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Reed, the GOP strategist, notedthat the issues of election integrity and voter suppression excite both sides.

"Its a juicy thing to both bases. Democrats will argue that Republicans are disenfranchising voters and Republicans will argue that Democrats are putting in place polices that will make it impossible for them to ever win an election again," Reed said. "Base messaging is motivated by fear and both of those have a way of spinning up the supporters in each camp into action and unification."

Follow this link:
S1 slammed as 'political corruption' as Republicans go all-in on attacking Dems' election reform bill - Fox News

Texas Senate approves social media "censorship" bill – The Texas Tribune

The Texas Senate early Thursday approved a bill that would prohibit social media companies with at least 100 million monthly users from blocking, banning, demonetizing or discriminating against a user based on their viewpoint or their location within Texas.

Senate Bill 12, sponsored by Republican state Sen. Bryan Hughes of Mineola, was approved after 2 a.m. Thursday. The measure, which would apply to Facebook, Twitter and YouTube, among others, would also require the companies to disclose their content moderation policies, publish regular reports about the content they remove and create an appeals process for user content that has been taken down.

The Texas attorney general would be allowed to file suit against any company that violates a provision of the bill. If upheld in court, the attorney general could recoup "reasonable" attorney's fees and investigative costs.

Experts have raised doubts about the legality of the measure. Hughes acknowledged that, if signed into law, SB 12 would almost certainly be challenged in court. He repeatedly referred to social media platforms as common carriers, though they have never been classified as such by law or in the court system. Common carriers, such as phone companies and cable providers, are private or public companies that transport goods or people and are barred by government regulators from discriminating against customers.

Even though theyre private actors, because they are common carriers, because they chose to enter this business and offer their services, then they are bound by certain rules, Hughes said.

Facebook and Google, which owns YouTube, did not respond to requests for comment. In remarks before Congress last week, company executives denied removing content or blocking users based on their viewpoints.

A Twitter spokesperson declined to comment specifically on SB 12, but said in a statement that the platform enforces "the Twitter Rules judiciously and impartially for everyone on our service regardless of ideology or political affiliation and our policies help us to protect the diversity and health of the public conversation."

The bill heads to the House, where two identical bills have been filed but so far have not moved forward in the State Affairs Committee.

During Tuesdays debate on the bill, state Sen. Roland Gutierrez, D-San Antonio, pointed out that while Facebook and Twitter would be included under the measure, websites such as Parler and Gab, which are popular among conservatives, would be left out because they have fewer than 100 million monthly users. He proposed an amendment that would have lowered the threshold to 25 million monthly users, but it was voted down by a vote of 21-10.

Hughes stressed that the measure seeks to protect all viewpoints. But at a press conference earlier this month, Gov. Greg Abbott announced his support for the measure and chided social media companies for leading a dangerous movement to silence conservative ideas [and] religious beliefs.

The rhetoric about silencing conservatives ramped up following the 2020 election, when platforms including Facebook and Twitter removed former President Donald Trumps account for inciting violence during the Jan. 6 U.S. Capitol insurrection. Prior to that, the platforms attached warnings to posts by Trump and other conservatives who were, without evidence, sowing doubt on the legitimacy of the election.

Republican politicians have long targeted technology giants accusing them of an anti-conservative bias and for silencing free speech, even though the actions to ban members were often in response to credible evidence that communications were inciting violence. A February report by researchers at New York University found that there are no credible studies showing that Twitter removes tweets for ideological reasons.

In a congressional hearing last October, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg told lawmakers that Democrats often say that we dont remove enough content, and Republicans often say we remove too much.

The fact that both sides criticize us doesnt mean that were getting this right, but it does mean there are real disagreements about where the limits of online speech should be, he said.

Twitter in January purged more than 70,000 accounts linked to the dangerous conspiracy theorist group QAnon for the movements connection to the U.S. Capitol attack.

Hughes in 2019 filed a similar measure that won Senate approval, but it ultimately died in committee in the Texas House.

Read more here:
Texas Senate approves social media "censorship" bill - The Texas Tribune