Media Search:



Sound Beautification Software Market 2020: Country Level Analysis And Future Prospective Analysis in the Latest Research | Ibm, Audacity, Ocenaudio,…

Download Sample Copy

Global "Sound Beautification Software Market" Research report 2021-2027 is a specialized and in-depth study of the Sound Beautification Software industry with a focus on the global market trend. The report aims to provide an overview of the global Sound Beautification Software market with detailed market segmentation by company, type, applications and geography. The global market for Sound Beautification Software is expected to experience strong growth during the forecast period. The report provides key statistics on the state of the market of the main players in the Sound Beautification Software market and offers the main trends and opportunities in the market.

According to our latest research, the global size of Sound Beautification Software is estimated at XX million USD in 2026 compared to XX million USD in 2020, with a variation of XX% between 2020 and 2021. The global market size for Sound Beautification Software is expected to grow by a CAGR of xx% over the next five years.

Download Free Sample Copy Of this Report@https://www.marketresearchintellect.com/download-sample/?rid=198249

A comprehensive competition analysis that covers insightful data on industry leaders aims to help potential new entrants to the market and existing players competing with the right direction make their decisions. Market structure analysis discusses in detail Sound Beautification Software companies with their profiles, their market revenue shares, their complete portfolio of their offerings, their networking and distribution strategies, their regional market footprint, and much more.

The geographic analysis of the global Sound Beautification Software market provided in the report is the ideal tool that competitors can use to uncover untapped sales and business expansion opportunities in different regions and countries. Each regional and national market of Sound Beautification Software considered in the research and analysis has been thoroughly studied according to market share, future growth potential, CAGR, market size and other important parameters. Each regional market has a different trend or not all regional markets are affected by the same trend. Taking this into consideration, the analysts who wrote the report provided a comprehensive analysis of the specific trends in each regional Sound Beautification Software market.

Attributes of the global Sound Beautification Software market report 2021-2027

REPORT ATTRIBUTE

Details

Year considered for estimate

2021

Historical data

2015 2020

Forecast period

2021 2027

Segments covered

Product types, applications, end users, regions, leading companies and more.

Top companies

Product Type

Types of application

Regional scope

North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Latin America, Middle East, Africa and more

Click to Get Incredible Discount On This Sound Beautification Software Report @ https://www.marketresearchintellect.com/ask-for-discount/?rid=198249

In the market segmentation by types of Sound Beautification Software, the ratio covers

In market segmentation by Sound Beautification Software applications, the report covers the following uses:

How big is the market in different countries of the world ?

What are the financial parameters of the industry ?

This Report covers many financial measures for the industry, including profitability, market value chain and key trends impacting each node with reference to business growth, revenue, return on sales, etc.

What are the most important references for the Sound Beautification Software industry ? Some of the most important benchmarks for the industry include sales growth, productivity (revenue), distribution of operating expenses, scope of control, and organizational composition. You will find all this in this Market Report.

Years considered for study:

The base year for the estimate: 2020

Historical data: 2015-2020

Forecast period: 2021-2027

Visit Our Blogs @https://www.marketresearchintellect.com/blog/

Verified Market Intelligence

Verified Market Intelligence is a BI enabled database service with forecasted trends and accurate market insights on over 20,000+ tracked markets helping organizations globally with their market research needs. VMI provides a holistic overview and global competitive landscape with respect to Region, Country, Segment and Key players for emerging and niche markets.

Click to Dashboard:https://www.verifiedmarketresearch.com/vmintelligence/

About Us:

Market Research Intellect provides syndicated and customized research reports to clients from various industries and organizations with the aim of delivering customized and in-depth research studies. Our advanced analytical research solutions, custom consulting and in-depth data analysis cover a range of industries including Energy, Technology, Manufacturing and Construction, Chemicals and Materials, Food and Beverages. Etc

Our research studies help our clients to make superior data-driven decisions, understand market forecasts, capitalize on future opportunities and optimize efficiency by working as their partner to deliver accurate and valuable information without compromise.

Having serviced over 5000+ clients, we have provided reliable market research services to more than 100 Global Fortune 500 companies such as Amazon, Dell, IBM, Shell, Exxon Mobil, General Electric, Siemens, Microsoft, Sony and Hitachi.

Contact us:

Mr. Edwyne FernandesMarket Research IntellectUS: +1 (650)-781-4080UK: +44 (753)-715-0008APAC: +61 (488)-85-9400US Toll-Free: +1 (800)-782-1768

Website https://www.marketresearchintellect.com/

Originally posted here:
Sound Beautification Software Market 2020: Country Level Analysis And Future Prospective Analysis in the Latest Research | Ibm, Audacity, Ocenaudio,...

Envestnet, Orion and Schwab will all launch crypto capabilities soon enough, insiders say, but Damon Deru just beat them all to market with more than…

AdvisorPeak launched a virtual means for RIAs to trade, rebalance and custody cryptocurrencies with Prime Trust; Fidelity will soon add Ethereum

Brooke's Note: It's worth a reminder; RIAs don't sell products. They sell a process. That process happens to often include buying and selling products or other assets. So if you are going to introduce a new asset to RIAs -- especially a novel and volatile one like cryptocurrency-- you'd better do it in a way that allows the RIA to manage it as a first-class citizen in the fiduciary process. That high bar helps explains why custodians have been slow to give RIAs decent crypto access. It also may underscore why Damon Deru (AdvisorPeak) is bringing crypto trades to the market as abundle. That said, in reporting this article -- in the midst of Coinbase IPO bedlam -- insiders and experts were quick to tell us that Deru's first mover advantage mayalready be endangered. The biggies are all coming -- just a matter of when and whether they'll have the depth and breadth of AdvisorPeak. Fidelity used the occasion of our query to firm up when Ethereumwill beadded to Bitcoin on its platform -- in the next eight and a half months, probably sooner.

AdvisorPeak is ready to giveRIAs with assets custodied at Schwab -- and elsewhere -- a means to buy, sell, trade and hold 100 cryptocurrencies.

The Salt Lake City, Utah rebalancing vendor announced its new partnership with crypto-custodian Prime Trust, Apr. 14. It gives RIAs at most major custodians* a means to trade digital currencies alongside more bread-and-butter stocks and bonds.

AdvisorPeak will charge no fee for its part in the bundle but expects to sell more software licenses.

"This isnt just a third-party integration with a retail digital asset vendor such as Coinbase - thatd be a fairly easy to pull off," saysDamon Deru, AdvisorPeak's founder and CEO, via email.

"This is an imbedded custodial integration that allows advisors to open digital asset accounts between Prime Trust and AdvisorPeak. The whole experience is very much a custodial relationship that advisors are used to operating in."

Founded in 2016in Summerlin, Nevada, Prime Trust is one of a number of startup crypto-custody vendors with an eye on RIA marketshare. Others include Gemini Trust Company, Coinbaseand Kingdom Trust. See: Fidelity bags $13 billion AUM digital assets win to its custody, as federal regulators attempt to move Bitcoin custody from 'weirdo websites' to mainstream banks.

Prime Trust also serves as custodian for two of the larger digital asset exchanges in the US: Binance USand Bittrex.

Though AdvisorPeak is afirst mover, a source says the companymay have waited too long to make the move.Orion, Tamarac and other market powers will beready to wield influence soon enough.

"Envestnet, Orion and several others will be rolling out solutions, [so] I don't think we'll remember this [AdvisorPeak] release, or care much about it in a few months," the source states.

"There are other, bigger, more important players ... so I give [AdvisorPeak] a very low probability of having success," the source adds.

Deru recognizes that rivals can -- and likely will -- catch up.

"Theres nothing stopping others from doing this tomorrow, but as things stand no one else has. We did," he says.

"[Yet] the reality is those who do attempt to build a solution like this will likely be with retail digital asset vendors, which at the end of the day really wont solve the problem for advisors," he adds.

Nor will AdvisorPeak charge for the add-on service that it hopes will attract new RIAs to its software.

Indeed, Edelman acknowledges that its a case of "when," not "if" the largest RIA vendors enter the fray.

"Digital assets are here to stay, and the question now is how rather than whether," he says.

The news comes during a week when Coinbase's IPO made crypto investors of virtually everyone.

With its market cap hovering near$100 billion, it is assured of being held by most broad-market index funds, andactively managed ones may like it even more, according to Bloomberg.

The AdvisorPeak innovation is consequential because it allows RIAs to invest in these digital currencies using the same process as the other assets in their portfolios, says Ric Edelman, founder of Edelman Financial Engines, and the RIA Digital Assets Council, via email.

"By giving advisors the ability to rebalance, AdvisorPeak removes a big obstacle toward advisor adoption of these investments," he explains.

It also "opens the door" to exponential growth in crypto trading, adds Lex Sokolin, global fintech co-head and chief economist for ConsenSys, via email.

"Think about the ETF growth curve. For financial advisors, the performance reporting and trading [and] rebalancing tooling is very important. The asset class is getting normalized."

AdvisorPeak is far from the first mover in providing access to RIA crypto-custody, although it is the first among its software peers to do so.

Eaglebrook Advisors, for instance, has already brought in $100 million in RIA crypto assets, and the crypto SMA vendor has partnered with a number of major RIAs, including Marty Bicknell's $35 billion AUM Mariner Wealth Advisors, and RIA outsourcer Dynasty Financial Partners.

The Washington, D.C. firm also has a sizable list of notable backers.

Vendors like Grayscale provide advisors another means to take a stake in the booming crypto-currency market through 15 investment funds.

Today, the 2013-founded fund shop manages $49.1 billion in digital assets, according its website.

Indeed, AdvisorPeak faces the problem that although it is the first among its software peers to embrace crypto-currencies, it is miniscule in comparison to its larger and better funded competition.

Approximately 1,000 advisors use AdvisorPeak's software, but the Utah rebalancing vendor, which employs 15 staff, declined to break out specifically how many RIAs and IBDs use its services.

In contrast, Orion's portfolio management softwareadministers $1.4 trillion on behalf of 2,100 RIAs, its TAMP manages $48 billion, and among several other business lines, the private-equity backed company sells financial planning and data analytics software.

But the AdvisorPeak-Prime Trust tie up hands RIAs a third-party work-around.

Itobviates the need for advisors to trade directly through crypto-custodians like Coinbase, use SMAs from vendors like EagleBrook, or avail of the budding number of crypto funds like the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust.

Increased support from traditional software firms and custodians is overdue, adds Edelman.

"Advisors need to be able to integrate client holdings of digital assets with the rest of their portfolio," he says.

The AdvisorPeak-Prime Trust partnership significantly expands the number of tradable cryptocurrencies to 100for advisors using its software.

It also hands the 10,000 RIAs custodied with major firms like Schwab Advisor Services a means to trade stocks, bondsand crypto-currencies in one place, including through IRAs and Roth IRAs.

Indeed, Deru's decision to press ahead with crypto-rebalancing could help tip the RIA crypto needle, says Edelman.

"A large number of advisors have delayed investing in digital assets because of their inability to manage the assets within their current practice protocols," he explains.

Fidelity Investments has been the most enthusiastic of the major custodians when it comes to crypto-currency, facilitating Bitcoin trading and custody.

Yet when asked about being theoretically leapfrogged, Fidelity says it is close to taking its own next leap by "supporting" Ethereum.It currently concentrates all its efforts in Bitcoin. See: Fidelity Investments applies its proven Peter Jubber to its unproven bitcoin unit and its launch of Fidelity Digital Funds signals it's all in on blockchain currency

The Bostongiant is taking the step as a way to move Fidelity Digital Assets from Bitcoin holder to -- move over Coinbase -- blockchain ecosystem.

"We have plans to support Ethereum later this year ... our belief in blockchain and digital assets is firm-wide and we've been working for years to develop a blockchain ecosystem and become a holistic solutions provider for digital assets," she adds.

Alongside its latest Ethereum announcement, Fidelity recently filed to launch a Bitcoin ETF. See: Brooke's Bits: Why Fidelity's bitcoin ETF application might have a shot.

The difference between the two currencies is that one is valued for what it is (Bitcoin) and the other for what it does (Ethereum), adds Sokolin.

"Bitcoin is functioning as a store of wealth ... Ethereum is a computing platform, which is rebuilding financial markets and economic activity through shared networks. decentralized Finance, NFTs, and most blockchain based software started and is run on Ethereum ... but it's like comparing gold and cloud computing."

Yet Schwab has proven reluctant to follow Fidelity's lead.

Asked whether Schwab's cautious crypto approach is the big factor encouraging him to risk pioneering an RIA service, Deru says he's hardly expecting the giant to keep sleeping.

"I wouldn't necessarily say Schwab not offering digital asset trading is the elephant in the room, but just the reality of the situation," he says.

"Schwab obviously has a lot on their plate right now with the TD Ameritrade acquisition, but we anticipate that they, and other custodians, will offer digital asset trading natively at some point."

Schwab declined to reveal whether it has plans to develop its own crypto custody and trading capabilities, despite reports in early March that it would use an outsourcer to launch a Schwab-branded solution -- reports it declined to confirm or deny.

"Wewillcontinue to listen to our clients feedback to make sure that our offering meets their needs," says Schwab spokeswoman Mayura Hooper, via email.

Watch this space, says a source, via email. "They are figuring out their big move. They will come soon."

Founded in 2018, AdvisorPeak has less than 1% market share, but that still gives it a top-six market presence, according to the 2021 T3 Technology Survey. See: Pete Giza and Damon Deru go for Holy Grail of portfolio rebalancing with software that shuffles stocks, bonds... and asset classes; Believe it?

It trails Schwab's iRebal (11.72%), Envestnet-owned Tamarac (9.46%), Orion Advisor Services' Eclipse (7.1%), SS&C-owned Black Diamond (2.32%)and Morningstar's TRX (2.02%), the survey states.

Yet establishing itself as the first mover among its peers provides a fillip to AdvisorPeak's bid to brand itself as more technologically nimble than its rivals, according to Deru.

"When we started AdvisorPeak our mantra was to drive innovation in trading and rebalancing for advisors.Including digital asset trading [on] our platform is an example of that," he says.

Three of the top five rebalancing vendors have yet to respond to a request for comment. Morningstar and Orion declined to comment. Rising portfolio accounting vendor Addepar noted that AdvisorPeak is a "valued partner".

Heady days

Today one Bitcoin trades at roughly $63,000, giving the currencya near $1.2 trillion market cap -- a surgein value of 810% in the past twelve months. In April 2020, one Bitcoin traded at approximately $6,877 -- a price that professionals even then considered high.

JP Morgan, Mastercard and UBS also notably just invested in New York City blockchain software company, ConsenSys, alongside several venture capital firms. ConsenSys announced its $65 million raise, Apr. 13. See: Vanguard Group seeks 'new business model,' it says, to explain blockchain pilot program.

"There is now sufficient custodian and brokerage support to justify investment," says Sokolin, who also restructured and led ConsenSys' marketing throughout 2020.

Goldman Sachs is another that has stepped up its involvement.

The Wall Street giant will launch a Bitcoin service for its wealthiest customers in the second quarter of this year, according to CNBC. But it will not add such capabilities to retail bank Marcus, CEO David Solomon told investors, during the firm's Apr. 14 earnings call.

Coinbase also just staged a blockbuster launch on the markets. The crypto-currency exchange floated on Nasdaq today at $381 per share. It swiftly surged to $429.26, but then fell to $328.28. See: Robinhood files for (give or take) $40-billion IPO before its 'zero' niche, its IPO window and its hipster appeal lose their buzz -- namely by March 31.

Yet many investment managers remain hugely skeptical of cryptocurrencies, according to a Bank of America survey released, Apr. 13. Some 74% of fund managers think Bitcoin is simply a market bubble, Barron's reports.

"Were studying it. We make money on it, but Im not here to tell you that were seeing broad-based interest by institutions worldwide," BlackRock CEO Larry Fink adds in commentsto CNBC, Apr. 14.

Yet advisor demand spurred AdvisorPeak's crypto launch, Deru asserts.

"[Its] been on our radar for years, but we weren't seeing adoption or much interest from advisors until this last year, which is what led us to finally move forward," he says.

* AdvisorPeak has integrated its software with Schwab, TD Ameritrade, Fidelity Investments, BNY Mellons Pershing, LPL Financial, National Financial, SSG, Interactive Brokers, and TradePMR, according to the firm.

Read more:
Envestnet, Orion and Schwab will all launch crypto capabilities soon enough, insiders say, but Damon Deru just beat them all to market with more than...

‘Equity is redistribution of resources, and that is socialism’ Rep. Giddings; Columbus, critical race theory cause for teachers denied funding -…

BOISE Teachers are in the spotlight again in Idaho, but once more, they are denied funding after House Bill 354 failed after a long debate. This hour and a half discussion on the floor involved fears that House Republicans have regarding teachers talking about race theory with their students, and even Christopher Columbus true contribution to history.

The bill in question would have given almost $10 million to Idaho teachers and school staff to support development, training, evaluations, increase learning, other resources and be distributed by the Department of Education where needs lie. The bill would also use part of the federal COVID-19 relief money that hasnt been completely distributed yet.

This comes after a pandemic wiped out in person teaching and cost many their own resources to keep students learning. One other bill, House bill 226, involving a grant for early childhood development, failed after a similar discussion about race and diversity only this one was more passionate, each member had something they felt was extremely necessary to add.

The main discussion regarding the bill was House Republicans explaining how they dont want money going to teachers who will use it to teach critical race theory and equity, even though the funding in the bill text had nothing to do with curriculum.

Rep. Priscilla Giddings, R-White Bird, was quoted as saying that equity is redistribution of resources, and that is socialism, something that other Republicans agreed has no room alongside Idahos conservative values. Her reasoning came from a substitute teacher that she said told her teachers in the classroom were teaching about race.

For reference, critical race theory is a way of interpreting issues from a race-conscientious standpoint, something that many House Republicans believe does not align with Idahos values.

Giddings gave a passionate example of how she saw a poster in a school classroom about Christopher Columbus being wanted dead or alive for his crimes, something she believed was not appropriate to be teaching in school, and that instances like this prove her point of teachers not providing the right curricula.

Giddings even stated that teaching this way is unconstitutional.

Ron Nate, R-Rexburg, explained he didnt want taxpayers paying for Idahos students to be learning social justice.

Not a lot of evidence has been physically shown these things are being taught in schools, but lawmakers like Rep. Julianne Young, R- Blackfoot, and Rep. Tammy Nichols, R- Middleton, have both spoken on things they feel have been concrete examples of critical race theory that needs to be addressed.

Rep. Nichols, when addressing past education bills, has touched on the fact that her son had to write a paper about the wage gap within black Americans in school, and that he is not responsible for it. Rep. Young said that she has talked to parents in her district that have told her it is a problem as well.

I have talked to parents in my school district that say their kids are getting critical race theory from their government teacher, said Young.

The discussion was a hard line between those who were saying Idahos teachers were long overdue for their extra funding, and those who had fears about race theory and social justice teachings.

Members like Caroline Nilsson Troy, R-Genessee, explained she believed teachers are doing the best they can, and that is helping Idahos economy.

Idahos economy is doing so well because our teachers went back to work, said Troy.

Rep. John McCrostie, D-Boise, is a high school teacher, who has said he has never seen any teachers talking about critical race theory, and he has never been given any professional development on it, either.

I dont have time to teach critical race theory, said McCrostie. The whole discussion about critical race theory coming into our classrooms, thats nuts.

Rep. Sally Toone just reminded the body that Idaho has been punishing their teachers and breaking their promises.

Expecting more out of teachers and school staff but not giving them anything in return is a problem both parties feel needs to be addressed regardless, but the bill failed 34-34 anyway.

This failure comes right after the failure of another education funding bill that was shot down for the same problems.

The bill goes back to JFAC to be reworked, where a new budget bill will return to the House.

Here is the original post:
'Equity is redistribution of resources, and that is socialism' Rep. Giddings; Columbus, critical race theory cause for teachers denied funding -...

What Losing Socialism Has Cost Us – The Triangle – Drexel University The Triangle Online

Socialism (or its even scarier cognate, communism) was for a good part of the 20th century the equivalent of what COVID has become for us, the terrible virus that lurked everywhere and perpetually threatened destruction to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

After the Bolshevik Revolution, it had a home, at least theoretically, in the geographically largest nation in the world, Russia; and after 1949 in the most populated one, China. The fight to contain or roll it back was called the Cold War, and the potential cost of doing so, in the Atomic Age, was the destruction of the planet a cost from which successive administrations did not shrink, at least until the nuclear standoff called the Cuban Missile Crisis brought us to the brink of actual disaster. Future historians can look back and make some sense of that if they are able to.

Russia shed communism in 1991, or what had supposedly passed for it. China did not repudiate its own version of it, but slipped quietly into the autocratic capitalism it faces us with today. Republicans like to keep the bogeyman of Communism alive, still attached to even mildly helpful initiatives such as President Joe Bidens relief and infrastructure bills, but, since hardly anyone still remembers what the word was supposed to mean, they interchangeably denounce liberalism or progressivism, signifying anything that involves the government with the exception of tax cuts for the rich or voter suppression laws. If politics, as George Orwell suggested, is the art of corrupting language to the maximum possible extent, then-Senator Mitch McConnell and Representative Matt Gaetz have few peers. It has to be admitted that Soviet Russia and Communist China had little to do with anything Karl Marx would have understood as socialism, collective ownership of the means of production.

Looking at them with rose or red colored glasses, Americans vaguely identifying themselves as liberals or socialists saw in them what they wanted to see up to about 1970, namely societies that sought to promote the general welfare rather than the wealth of a few. And it was true that, in theory, this was the professed goal of so-called socialist states. That perception had real-world effects, particularly as the capitalist world wrestled with the devastating effects of the Great Depression of the 1930s that virtually shut the global economy down. If capitalism could lead to such systemic paralysis, why not give communism a try? The result of this was a mid-century period when developed Western countries experimented with something called social democracy, namely the attempt to graft populist reforms onto a capitalist framework. This was galvanized by World War II. The fight against Nazi Germany had to be one not only against tyrannical fascism but for something else. Democracy alone parliamentary governments whose leaders were chosen by popular vote would not fill the bill, since it had not prevented an economic collapse that had exposed transparent social injustice. And in the wake of the war, communist parties in France and Italy had come uncomfortably close to winning national elections with their programs.

To forestall the possibility that Soviet-style communism might not only succeed by violent revolution or military occupation but peacefully at the ballot box, Western leaders undertook to offer reforms premised on the idea that stable prosperity was compatible with, and indeed dependent on, government-supported welfare programs. This was enunciated in President Franklin D. Roosevelts so-called Four Freedoms speech of 1941, which included a freedom from want that defined economic security as a basic human right. Roosevelt meant this as a permanent extension of the social commitments of the New Deal, while in Britain, the Beveridge Commission envisioned a broad postwar program to create what would come to be known as the welfare state. Nor were these merely national initiatives; Roosevelt and Prime Minister Winston Churchill jointly affirmed the principle of social welfare in the Atlantic Charter, and it was universalized after the war in the United Nations Declaration on Human Rights.

The grand rhetoric of freedom from want did not mean an abandonment of the national interests of the victorious Western powers, or of capitalism, with its boom and bust cycles of prosperity that made economic insecurity a standing threat. The fine print of Roosevelts promise enjoined worldwide free trade and tariff reductions, which favored advanced industrial countries at the expense of developing ones. Britain, which elected a Labour government in 1945, did go some distance toward a welfare state, creating a national health care system and, for a time, nationalizing some basic industries and services. In most of Western Europe, a system of social services was instituted, including government-run or regulated health care, child and elder care and unemployment benefits. Strong union pressure contributed to much of this, but underlying it was the fear, particularly acute in the postwar period, of Soviet expansion. Russia had occupied most of Eastern Europe during the war, asserting political control over it and introducing its version of communism, with state ownership of the means of production, centralized economic planning and a one-party system. It advertised itself as more stable, efficient and socially just.

As we have seen, it had considerable appeal through communist political parties in the West. And, somewhat more belligerently, it was backed by the worlds largest army, which had just defeated Adolf Hitler. All these reasons, and the additional problem of resettling millions of war-displaced refugees, impelled West European governments to play a more active role than they had formerly, including the provision of social benefits. Some of their policies might have occurred in the ordinary course of events.

Some, such as urban policing, public education and sanitation, were already in place. But the prime impetus for the welfare state was the challenge of the communist model. Western states could tout the benefits of freedom and opportunity. But economic security was precisely what the capitalist model had failed to provide, and what a planned economy with guarantees of subsistence and benefits seemed to offer. In the ideological battle between capitalism and socialism, the former had to demonstrate what, besides spasmodic growth and sudden contraction, it could work.

The welfare state was the West European answer. The U.S. did not follow suit, except for an expansion of public sector post-secondary education. It was not until the mid-1960s that a very limited public health program, Medicare, was instituted for seniors and the disabled over the fierce opposition of the medical profession, and a so-called War on Poverty, abandoned far short of its goal, was undertaken as the only general effort to realize freedom from want in the richest country on earth. America has been very generous to its wealthy, but for the rest of the country, any effort at social equity has been routinely decried as socialism a term that carries its own terrible if never precisely defined opprobrium.

These events have coincided with a massive turn to the right in the past half-century. The reasons for this are many, but perhaps the major one has been the abandonment of socialism as a coherent ideology and a political goal. This climaxed with the fall of the Soviet Union, whose last leader, Mikhail Gorbachev, admitted catastrophically that, after seven decades, it had not achieved true socialism. With China, too, now a de facto capitalist society, there is no present alternative to the capitalist order. It seems no coincidence that we are also on the brink of ecological disaster and global anarchy. The question to be asked perhaps is whether socialism, with its dream of a just and egalitarian society, failed us, or whether we failed socialism.

See original here:
What Losing Socialism Has Cost Us - The Triangle - Drexel University The Triangle Online

Letter: Wealth tax is a giant step toward socialism – Shreveport Times

John Odom, Letter to the Editor Published 12:22 p.m. CT April 13, 2021

To subscribe to The Times go to https://help.shreveporttimes.com/subscription-services Shreveport Times

President Joe Biden and Sen. Elizabeh Warrens wealth tax would cause a disruption in the markets that could cause losses of value in the retirement and investment accounts of the middle class.

This is because the wealthys wealth is not in cash but largely in stocks, real estate and art. To pay a wealth tax they would have to sell large blocks of stock that would force market prices down for everyone invested in the markets.

Warren is not ignorant of the market disruption her proposed Wealth Tax could take. Indeed, it is the opening salvo toward government control of industry. The next step is for a responsible Congress to intervene and prevent the disruption in the markets that could cause the middle class to incur losses in their retirement accounts when significant stock liquidations occur as the wealthy prepare to pay their taxes.

The cure will be to require the taxes be paid by transferring stock to the government in a private sale.'' The government may even state what stocks it will accept. The end game is to have enough stock transferred to the government for the government to be able secure seats on the boards of selected companies which will eventually result in government representatives controlling senior management.

As long as we maintain free and fair elections, which are also under attack, the citizens can maintain some control, but the march toward government control of all aspects of our society is underway.

I, for one, do not think Warrens wealth tax is intended as a short-term solution to pay off massive debt, but a plan designed with a socialist outcome intended, probably with a lot of input from Sen. Bernie Sanders.

John Odom

Shreveport

Read or Share this story: https://www.shreveporttimes.com/story/opinion/readers/2021/04/13/letter-wealth-tax-would-giant-step-toward-socialism/7206259002/

Read more:
Letter: Wealth tax is a giant step toward socialism - Shreveport Times