Media Search:



‘I didn’t deserve it’: Grandfather sues Fayetteville police officer, city alleging excessive use of force – The Fayetteville Observer

A grandfather who called police in 2019 alleging his granddaughters boyfriend threatened them with a weapon has filed a lawsuit against the Fayetteville Police Department after a police officer slammed him to the ground, knocking him unconscious, according to a civil complaint filed Thursday in Cumberland County Superior Court.

Robert Edwards, 66, suffered a concussion, brain bleed and contusions in the March 4, 2019, incident outside his Topeka Street home, his attorney Michael Porter said.

It was whileEdwards argued with the boyfriend that Officer Patrick Guilette placed Edwards hands behind his back and swept his legs from beneath him, taking Edwards to the ground, the complaint alleges.

When Edwards fell, his head struck the asphalt and he lost consciousness, body camera video of the altercation provided by Edwards' attorneys Thursday shows.

Its our legal opinion that he had no excuse to leg sweep him, said attorneyMichael Porter.

Porter and attorney Drew Dempster filed the lawsuit on behalf of Edwards.

"We believe, as stated in the complaint, that the officer used inappropriate and excessive force in violation of our client's civil rights.

Moreover, Porter continued, the city has condoned this conduct because to our knowledge this officer has not been reprimanded and they have refused to do right by Mr. Edwards."

Story continues below

After Edwards was taken from the scene to the hospital and released, he was booked into the Cumberland County jail on a charge of obstructing an officer. The charge was later dropped by the Cumberland County District Attorneys Office.

Porter said that before filingthe lawsuit he sent a demand letter to the city in June 2020 asking that Edwards be compensated $390,000. His hospital bills were in excess of $33,000.

The demand and subsequent lawsuit allege that Guilette committed common law battery against Edwards; that the officer and the city violated Edwards' Fourth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure; that the officer and the city committed malicious prosecution against Edwards; and that he was falsely imprisoned.

In a response from city attorney Karen McDonald in December on behalf of the City Council and shared by Porter with the Observer McDonald said the council met in closed session and viewed the bodycam footage as well as a demand letter for $390,000 from Edwards.

After thoughtful review and discussion, the Council did not express any interest in settling this matter or making a counteroffer, McDonald wrote.

Use of force:Police are fueling outrage over Andrew Brown Jr.s death by withholding information, experts say

In a revised demand letter sent Wednesday to the city that included copies of Edwards medical treatment and billing along with information gleaned from a use-of-force expert retained by the defense, Porter concluded:

A paradigm shift is occurring in the country in regards to citizens no longer ignoring the misconduct of law enforcement, particularly in regards to their interactions with persons of color like Mr. Edwards, he wrote. "If a settlement cannot be reached, we will hold a press conference when we file our civil action, and we will issue a press release along with copies of the video footage, the medical records, medical bills and City's response to our demands."

McDonalds brief response Thursday to the amended demand noted she had notified the council of the revised demand, medical bills and that the defense had enlisted the help of a use-of-force expert.

"The City Council has not authorized a counteroffer at this time."

Sgt. Jeremy Glass, a spokesman for the Fayetteville Police Department, said in a statement Thursday afternoon that the department is aware of the lawsuit.

There is body camera footage of the incident which includes the events leading up to Mr. Edwardss arrest, he said. In anticipation of potential litigation a use of force expert also reviewed the footage and determined that the actions of Officer Guilette were appropriate and reasonable under the circumstances and that Officer Guilette used the least amount of effective force to control the situation, he said. The City intends to vigorously defend the lawsuit.

Watch: Body cam video released in alleged Fayetteville police brutality

The City of Fayetteville and one of its police officers are facing a lawsuit alleging excessive force against Robert Edwards, an elderly Black man.

Body Camera Footage, Fayetteville PD

The body camera footage, released by order of Cumberland County Superior Court Judge Mary Ann Tally in December. shows the events leading up to Edwards injury.

Police were called to the Fayetteville home about 2 p.m. for a dispute between Edwards granddaughter and her ex-boyfriend, Porter said.

In the video, the granddaughter explains that her ex-boyfriend hit her car with his car.

Officer Erin Scullion responded first to the scene and Guilette arrived as backup.

Prior to Guilettes arrival, video from Scullions bodycamshows that Edwards asks at least twice that the boyfriend be arrested, before he swings at the younger man and the two fall to the ground.

When Scullion threatens to use a stun gun, the younger man holds his hands out saying he was attacked.

By the time Guilette arrived, the two men had stopped scuffling and Edwards went back into his home.

The video from Guilettes body camera shows his arrival at the scene.

Policing in America:Service file reveals commendations, reprimands for ex-police officer in Daunte Wright shooting death

The moment he steps from the vehicle and approaches Scullion he asks, Who'sgoing to jail, as the boyfriend excitedly says he was just trying to leave.

The grandfather assaulted him, Scullion says pointing toward the house as Edwards emerges from the front door.

This man threatened us with a gun, Edwards yells, walking directly toward Guilette.

We need some help, he says. "This man threatened me with a gun."

"I didn't threaten you, the boyfriend responds, and Edwards spins around toward him and yells, You told me you had a gun in the car!

The two men are within feet of each other.

When the boyfriend moves, Edwards flinches and throws his hands up as if to block an expected blow.

Guilette then pulls Edwards away from the younger man, telling him to go stand near his yard.

The two are separated momentarily until Edwards comes back toward the younger man asking if he thinks hes a punk.

Guilettes bodycam then shows Guilette pulling Edwards' relaxed arms behind his back. Within moments, both men are on the ground. Edwards is unconscious.

Are you crazy he's 74 goddamn years old! You done lost your damn mind," the granddaughter screams, mistaking her grandfather's age, as she rushes to his side.

Scullion pulls the 20-year-old woman off her unconscious grandfather as he lies motionless and face down in the street.

Black lives matter! the granddaughter screams several times, her voice cracking with emotion.

Guilette cuffs Edwards while repeating, "Sir," as if to wake him. "Sir, you OK?"

The officer then stands up and through his shoulder radio asks dispatch to send an ambulance.

He again tries to wake Edwards, who's audibly snoring.

A voice off-camera asks, "Can I get your name and your badge number? I need your name and badge number. We called for help," as the granddaughter again crouches on the ground next to her grandfather crying, "Granddaddy, are you OK?"

When Guilette puts his hand on Edwards back, the young woman swats it away.

"Get off of him! she yells, then falls back onto the street crying Oh my God, he's all I got left!"

After Scullion intervenes and pulls the young woman off Edwards, Guilette rolls him onto his side, again calling out "Sir," and asking, "You OK, sir? Can you talk to me? Can you talk to me, sir?"

In the background, the granddaughter is heard yelling.

"This is what the white cops do to you. This is why you don't call the police. My granddaddy just got knocked out cold because I called the police ..." she cries.

After uncuffing Edwards and rolling him over, Guilette begins to rub on his sternum. Edwards appears to be regaining consciousness.

"What's his name, sweetheart," Guilette asks, to which the girl replies angrily, You did this!

After a little more than two minutes of unresponsiveness, Edwards starts to raise his head as the officers ask his name.

More than two minutes later he mumbles his name.

Seeing this, his granddaughter walks toward him.

"Granddaddy, let's go in the house. Please get up so we can just leave them out here she says.

Guilette tells her an ambulance is coming.

"He could be injured," the officer says.

"You did this," the young woman yells.

"You're right because he wasn't listening, ma'am, Guilette replies.

Eventually, the granddaughter pulls her grandfather to his feet. He is unsteady and Guilette holds onto his arm.

When the woman continues to try to get Edwards to go inside, Guilette says, "Ma'am, we're not done."

A third officer approaches and walks out of frame.

Moments later, as Guilette urges Edwards to walk over to his patrol car to lean on it, the camera catches a glimpse of the granddaughter on the ground and an officer placing her in handcuffs.

At his patrol car, Guilette is asking Edwards questions like what day, month or year it is. Edwards cant answer the questions. He appears confused.

"Can I go in the house and sit down?" Edward asks.

We're gonna hang out 'cause I got an ambulance coming. I got an ambulance coming to check you out cause you hit your head pretty hard, Guilette responds. I put you on the ground because you weren't listening, you were trying to fight the other young man on the street.

No, not me ...When? a dazed Edwards asks.

"Y'all was about to fight in the street, sir, and you weren't listening when I tried to telling you to go back into your yard," Guilette says.

Edwards asks if he can lay down, but Guilette tells him no, that he should stand because he hit his head.

"Can I lay down?" Edwards asks again.

Guilette repeats that Edwards hit his head and EMS is coming.

"I hit my head?" Edwards said, then asks again if he can lay down.

You hit your head pretty hard when I put you on the ground. I wouldn't lay down right now, OK. I wanna wait 'til the ambulance gets here and checks you out, Guilette says.

You put me on the ground? Edwards says.

You came out here trying to fight him and I told you to stop and you didn't stop, Guilette says.

Not me, the unsteady Edwards replies as he leans against the patrol car.

You did, which I get it. It was emotional, I get it. You were just protecting your granddaughter. But you can't do that. When I tell you to stop, you gotta stop.

"Can I lay down?" Edward asks yet again.

Toward the end of the video, Edwards hold his stomach and says he has to vomit.

Porter on Thursday noted that is a symptom of a concussion.

Edwards was treated at the hospital and released, only to be booked into jail on the obstruction charge. Ultimately, the charge was dismissed. His granddaughter was not charged, despite being placed in handcuffs.

The following day, Porter said, an ambulance was called to Edwards' home and he was taken to the emergency room.

Doctors diagnosed him with a brain bleed, contusion on the brain and concussion. The brain bleed had been missed the day prior, Porter said. Edwards also sustained scrapes and abrasions on his face, shoulder and arms, Porter said.

Robert Edwards was born and raised in Fayetteville, he said Thursday during a three-way call with the Observer that included his attorney Porter.

Edwards recalls, as a Black man, being treated badly by law enforcement in the 1960s, specifically naming the officer who he said beat him.

But we was used to taking an ass-whooping back then, Edwards chuckled, his voice metered and gravely, sounding older than his 66 years.

It would be the only chuckle that would tumble from Edwards as he recounted, sometimes tearfully, what happened on that day two years ago when Gods will helped him survive.

He remembers that his granddaughter first called police after her boyfriend hit her car with his.

He remembers calling police himself after Officer Scullion arrived and she seemed unable to control the situation alone.

He said he next remembers waking up on the ground.

When my granddaughter tried to pick me up, I kept saying to myself, How did I get in the road, did a car hit me?

He hasnt watched the full body camera footage, he admits. Porter said when Edwards tried, he became emotional and had to walk out.

The thought of what happened to him something he can only imagine because the memory is gone makes his voice catch in his throat.

I never expected nothing to happen like this. I could see if I was in a bar where somebody was drunk and hanging out, but not at my house, he said.

Originally posted here:
'I didn't deserve it': Grandfather sues Fayetteville police officer, city alleging excessive use of force - The Fayetteville Observer

Utah bar bombarded with angry calls after requiring vaccine to dine in – fox13now.com

SALT LAKE CITY A Salt Lake City bar is being bombarded with angry phone calls, because the bar is going to require customers be vaccinated to get in the door.

While irate callers claim it's against the law, HIPAA, and the constitution, The Bayou owners said it's legal and they're doing it to keep people safe.

After more than a year with the front door closed, the inside empty, and curbside pickup only, The Bayou is ready to reopen and welcome customers back.

On Thursday, Mark Alston answered the phone at The Bayou, taking to-go orders. One woman called to say she was outside and ready to pick her order up.

"Yep, I got it right here," he said, lifting up a green plastic bag filled with a few containers. He set the bag on a table outside, for the customer to grab. It's how Alston and his wife Kileen Alston have been serving people since March of 2020.

But in less than a week, The Bayou will once again allow customers to sit at its tables.

Sitting down at a computer stationed at the bar, Alston pulled up Facebook messages they've received of support at the reopening announcement.

"'Can't wait!'" He said, reading a message. He clicked on another and kept reading. "'Excitement! Yes!'" things like that. 'Be right there!'"

Others have been calling The Bayou. Alston answered the phone, wondering if it was a takeout order.

It wasn't.

"To hell with you guys, then. This is ridiculous." a woman said to Alston. "We'll miss you I guess you--" Alston began to reply, before the woman interrupted with, "This is ridiculous."

Alston then said, "I guess you've been a customer for a while, and we're really going to miss your..." The woman continued, "Yeah, Yeah. I bet you are. Me and hundreds of other people. You have no right to demand that. This is America. It's sickening."

The woman was one of dozens to call The Bayou since their Wednesday announcement, to say they're disgusted that The Bayou announced patrons must show a COVID-19 vaccination card in addition to an ID to get in. Alston explained people can show a physical card or a picture of one.

He said it's not a health decision he wanted to make, but with mandates expiring and vaccinations on the rise, Alston explained he felt it was a necessary one.

"This is our requirement to keep everybody safe, because we have to make those decisions," he said.

Because people can't wear masks while eating and drinking, Alston talked about how he feels it's impossible to keep people safe at his bar. He is worried about the safety of himself and his wife, his staff, and his patrons.

One of the musicians who used to play at The Bayou before they shut down in March 2020 contracted COVID-19 last summer and passed away, Alston said. Alston described how the pianist's loss was completely preventable.

He wants to make sure everyone at his restaurant is protected against COVID-19 if they aren't going to be wearing masks.

"We are following what the CDC guidelines are," he said. "It's absolutely crystal clear. When you are fully vaccinated, hang out with other people who are fully vaccinated without your masks on, eating/drinking-- you're totally fine. If you're hanging out with people who aren't fully vaccinated, keep the mask on."

He said most of his regular customers have backed his decision, writing to express that they're on board.

But it hasn't stopped people who Alston strongly suspects have never eaten at or heard of The Bayou, from calling to sound off. People have also been writing false negative reviews on Yelp, he said.

"We have been called communists, we have been compared to running an Auschwitz camp in Nazi Germany," he said.

One woman called, getting louder and angrier as she spoke.

"This goes against the Fourth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America!" she exclaimed. "Hmmm," Alston replied, listening.

She told Alston she called the health department and claimed that they told her it was against HIPAA laws. She also said that people will be "taking signatures" against his business.

"That is not a f***ing law. I will never feed into this propaganda, V for Vendetta type bullsh**," she said. "V for Vendetta?" Alston asked. "Take the red tape off your eyes, sir," she continued. "Red tape? What is red tape?" Alston asked. "Red tape means propaganda, sir. Wake the f*** up. I hope your business tanks after this."

Alston tried to explain at one point that he is not violating any HIPAA laws, and that he is legally allowed to ask to see the vaccination card because it's not considered medical information.

"This is disgusting that you are going to require a citizen of the United States of America to show you a slice of paper in order for them to dine in your restaurant," the caller said. "Do you not feel that that is pro-segregation and discrimination?!"

The woman then said Alston is discriminating against her and that it's an equality law. She eventually hangs up on him after several minutes of them talking back-and-forth.

The Salt Lake County Health Department confirmed to Fox 13 Thursday that they haven't received any complaints about The Bayou, unlike what the caller claimed. They also said that this is not within their realm, and that they are not advising businesses on what to do or not do with vaccination cards.

According to the CDC, HIPAA laws only apply to healthcare-related organizations, and the laws are to prevent patient information from being shared without the patient's consent or knowledge.

It's also important to note that the Fourth Amendment has to do with search and seizure by law enforcement.

Alston sat down at his computer again.

"Ahhhhhh!" he sighed, rubbing his face. "I think when I was researching just to make sure we weren't actually going to be violating any laws-- which we aren't. You try to find out something, all the legal pages and all the information is like, businesses can do this but no one has done it."

To his knowledge, Alston said he's the first business to require something like this. But according to all his research, he's able to ask for proof of the card.

For anyone not vaccinated, Alston will still be offering curbside. He also said he understands that some people can't get the vaccine because of medical reasons or religious reasons, and he's coming up with accomodations for those people.

For The Bayou, this is how they want to get back to normal. Alston said he won't be requiring masks or social distancing in his bar and restaurant.

It's just that vaccination card, that he wants to see.

Originally posted here:
Utah bar bombarded with angry calls after requiring vaccine to dine in - fox13now.com

SJC reviewing case involving New Bedford police and department’s use of gang list – SouthCoastToday.com

BOSTON The state's Supreme Judicial Court on Monday heard its first arguments in a case concerninga New Bedford man and the New Bedford Police Department's use of a gang list.

ZahkuanBailey-Sweeting is alleging his Fourth Amendment rights were violated during a traffic stop in February 2018 in which he was a passenger.

Police stopped a car after it unsafely changed lanes. During the stop, three New Bedford police officers from the gang unit frisked all four passengers and found Bailey-Sweeting, then 18 years old, in possession of a large capacity firearm without a license.

Under the law, police can only frisk someone if they have reasonable suspicion, under articulable facts, thatthe person is both armed and dangerous.

In a court brief, Elaine Fronhofer,Bailey-Sweeting's attorney, arguesNew Bedford police officers acted on a "hunch" to unlawfully search him after the front seat passenger, Raekwan Paris, beganactinguncharacteristically (the officers testifiedhe had been calm and compliant during previous stops).

Their "hunch" was thatParis, who they identified as a gang member and knew to have a previous firearm offense,was acting this way to distract them from something in the car,Fronhofer said. As a result of the officers' inferences, Bailey-Sweeting, who was sitting in the back seat quietly, was frisked, she said.

Bristol County Assistant District Attorney Shoshana Stern, who is representing the state,said a totality of factors, including the officers' identification of Bailey-Sweeting as a gang member and his three-year-oldfirearm offense as a juvenile, led them to reasonably infer he could be armed and dangerous.

When Supreme Judicial Court Justice Scott Kafker asked if the officers would have frisked Bailey-Sweeting without thegang identification and just the previous firearm offense, Stern said the gang membership was a "plus factor" among the other factors.

In her brief, she arguesgang membership alone does not provide reasonable suspicion, but is a "part of the totality of the circumstances the police confront and must assess."

Fronhofer arguesthe Appeals Court and police relied too much on this gang designation, which she said is unreliable and racially biased.

"This case marks a significant erosion of protections citizens have had in dealing with police," Fronhofer said during Monday's argument. "The Appeals Court decision, rather than putting curbs on how this gang categorization label is used, actually expands it, it really opens the gate."

She said the Appeals Court, whichruled in favor of the state, used the gang categorization of Bailey-Sweeting to "bridge any and all gaps" in the evidence needed to reach the conclusion that the officers had reasonable suspicion thathe was armed and dangerous.

While Bailey-Sweeting confirmed on arrest that he was a member of the Bloods gang,Fronhofer argues the officers had no previous evidence the defendant had ever committed any crime in relation to that gang, and that during the stop he never acted in a way that suggested he was armed or dangerous, per officer testimony.

She also arguesgang membership needs to be reliable and relevant to the case. According to court documents, the stop was made due to an unsafe lane change unrelated to gang activity as the four passengers headedto Kentucky Fried Chicken.

The New Bedford Police Department uses a point system to determine whether someone is a gang member. Criteria have different points ascribed to them but if an individual scores at least 10 points, then the department considers them a gang member.

Advocates have argued the system is subjective and arbitrary.For example, Fronhofer noted that in Boston, Bailey-Sweeting might not have earned enough points to be considereda gang member.In New Bedford, appearing in a group-related photograph earns an individual four points; in Boston, it only counts for two points.

Bailey-Sweeting previouslyreceived 10 points for appearing in a photo with a group of Bloods members, wearing a red bandana and makingBloods hand gestures, according to Fronhofer's brief.

Fronhofer in her argument also cited the recent Citizens for Juvenile Justice report, which published data last monthon the New Bedford Police Departmentgang list.

'We are the Prey' report:New Bedford over-policing Black youth, certain areas of city

Based on department data,Citizens for Juvenile Justice found Black and Hispanic men were more likely to appear on the department's ganglist.The organization calledthe department'smethods for identifying gang members subjective and criticizedthe lack of due process forindividuals to challenge their inclusion.

Being identified as a gang member can have significant repercussions including higher bails, lengthened sentences and possible deportation, advocates say, which can become especially problematic if a person is wrongfully included.

A spokesperson for the New Bedford Police Department said they do not have a policy that allows people on the list to appeal their inclusion on the list, nor do they notify people that they have been put on the list.

During the oral arguments, the justices tried to get a sense of how much Bailey-Sweeting's firearm history as a juvenile and his designation as a gang member factored into the officers' decision to frisk.

"I think we're all concerned with: where's the line?" Justice Serge Georges Jr. said. "Where is it localized to Mr. Bailey-Sweeting and what he was doing or not doing in terms of the justification for the pat frisk?"

Stern said the central issue in this case is determining what is a reasonable suspicion versus a hunch. She saidit's up to people whether or not they "buy" the officers' inference that Paris was trying to distract them from something in the car.

"But how do you make that leap?" Chief Justice Kimberly Budd said in response. "He could be trying to distract from something in the trunk, he could be trying to distract from something in the glove box... Even if Paris is acting unusual... how do you get to [Bailey-Sweeting]?"

Stern arguesthat if he was trying to distract from something in the car, it could be thepeople; regarding the people in the car, Bailey-Sweeting had a firearm history and was a gang member according to the department's criteria and officer knowledge.

Kafker asked Stern how the state should look at validation of gang membership and whether it was "good enough" in this case. Stern said it is a conversation worth having, but not necessarily in regards to this case.

Eight organizations filed a joint brief in support of Bailey-Sweeting, including Citizens for Juvenile Justice and the American Civil Liberties Union.

They argue the gang designation has "devastating consequences" and serves as a "workaround" to the reasonable suspicion needed to frisk, viewing it as a label instead of an articulable fact.

"Because he had been labeled a gang member, a young Black man could not sit in the backseat of a car during a traffic stop without suffering the indignity of the police invasively touching his body," their brief states.

They, like Fronhofer, argue Paris was upset and not acting "calm" in the way officers previously found him because he felt repeatedly targeted and harassed by police.

"[Bailey-Sweeting] was patfrisked based not on his own actions but those of the front-seat passenger, Raekwan Paris, whose reasonable reaction to police targeting was pathologized and criminalized," the organizations state.

According to Stern's brief and oral argument, the officers would not have removed or frisked any of the passengers if Paris had not acted that way, even though they identified Bailey-Sweeting as a gang member.

The organizations state the courts should not uncritically defer to police judgments about the significance of gang affiliations or use such affiliations to "cloud" the circumstances of a search.They urged the Supreme Judicial Court to provide clear instructions to lower courts about the weight that should be given to gang membership when considering reasonable suspicion.

Stern, on behalf of the state, is asking the court to affirm Bailey-Sweeting's conviction. Fronhofer and the many nonprofit organizations are requesting the court reverse his conviction.

The rest is here:
SJC reviewing case involving New Bedford police and department's use of gang list - SouthCoastToday.com

IBM Extends HBCU Initiatives Through New Industry Collaborations – PRNewswire

ARMONK, N.Y., May 7, 2021 /PRNewswire/ --IBM (NYSE: IBM) announced today it has extended its IBM Global University Program with historically black colleges and universities (HBCUs) to 40 schools.

IBM is now working with the American Association of Blacks in Higher Education (AABHE), 100 Black Men of America, Inc., Advancing Minorities' Interest in Engineering (AMIE) and the United Negro College Fund (UNCF) to better prepare HBCU students for in-demand jobs in the digital economy.

In parallel, the IBM Institute for Business Value released a new reportwith broad-ranging recommendations on how businesses can cultivate more diverse, inclusive workforces by establishing similar programs and deepening engagement with HBCUs.

IBM's HBCU program momentum has been strong in an environment where only 43% of leaders across industry and academia believe higher education prepares students with necessary workforce skills.* In September 2020, IBM announced the investment of $100 million in assets, technology and resources to HBCUs across the United States. Through IBM Global University Programs, which include the continuously enhanced IBM Academic Initiative and IBM Skills Academy, IBM has now:

Building on this work, IBM and key HBCU ecosystem partners are now collaborating to expedite faculty and student access and use of IBM's industry resources.

In its new report, "Investing in Black Technical Talent: The Power of Partnering with HBCUs," IBM describes how HBCUs succeed in realizing their mission and innovate to produce an exceptional talent pipeline, despite serious funding challenges. IBM explains its approach to broad-based HBCU collaboration with a series of best-practices for industry organizations.

IBM's series of best practices include:

To download the full report, please visit: LINK.

HBCU students continue to engage with IBM on a wide range of opportunities. These include students taking artificial intelligence, cybersecurity or cloud e-learning courses and receiving a foundational industry badge certificate in four hours. Many also attend IBM's virtual student Wednesday seminars with leading experts, such as IBM neuroscientists who discuss the implications of ethics in neurotechnology.

Statements from Collaborators "HBCUs typically deliver a high return on investment. They have less money in their endowments, faculty is responsible for teaching a larger volume of classes per term and they receive less revenue per student than non-HBCUs. Yet, HBCUs produce almost a third of all African-American STEM graduates,"** said Valinda Kennedy, HBCU Program Manager, IBM Global University Programs and co-author of "Investing in Black Technical Talent: The Power of Partnering with HBCUs.""It is both a racial equity and an economic imperative for U.S. industry competitiveness to develop the most in-demand skills and jobs for all students and seek out HBCU students who are typically underrepresented in many of the most high-demand areas."

"100 Black Men of America, Inc. is proud to collaboratewith IBM to deliver these exceptional and needed resources to the HBCU community and students attending these institutions. The 100 has long supported and sought to identify mechanisms that aid in the sustainability of historically black colleges and universities. This collaboration and the access and opportunities provided by IBM will make great strides in advancing that goal," stated 100 Black Men of America Chairman Thomas W. Dortch, Jr.

"The American Association of Blacks in Higher Education is proud to collaborate with IBM," said Dereck Rovaris, President, AABHE. "Our mission to be the premier organization to drive leadership development, access and vital issues concerning Blacks in higher education works perfectly with IBM's mission to lead in the creation, development and manufacture of the industry's most advanced information technologies.Togetherthis collaboration will enhance both organizations and the many people we serve."

"IBM is a strong AMIE partnerwhose role is strategic and support is significant in developing a diverse engineering workforce through AMIE and our HBCU community.IBM's presence on AMIE's Board of Directors provides leadership for AMIE's strategies,key initiatives and programsto achieve our goal of a diverse engineering workforce," said Veronica Nelson, Executive Director, AMIE."IBM programslike the IBM Academic Initiative and the IBM Skills Academyprovideaccess, assets and opportunities for our HBCU faculty and students to gain high-demand skills in areas like AI, cybersecurity, blockchain, quantum computing and cloud computing. IBM is a key sponsor of the annual AMIE Design Challenge introducing students to new and emerging technologies through industry collaborations and providing experiential activities like IBM Enterprise Design Thinking, which is the foundational platform for the Design Challenge. The IBM Masters and PhD Fellowship Awards program supports our HBCU students with mentoring, collaboration opportunities on disruptive technologies as well as a financial award. The IBM Blue Movement HBCU Coding Boot Camp enables and recognizes programming competencies. IBM also sponsors scholarships for the students at the 15 HBCU Schools of Engineering to support their educational pursuits. IBM continues to evolve its engagement with AMIE and the HBCU Schools of Engineering."

"The IBM Skills Academy is timely in providing resources that support the creativity of my students in the Dual Degree Engineering Program at Clark Atlanta University," said Dr. Olugbemiga A. Olatidoye, Professor, Dual Degree Engineering and Director, Visualization, Stimulation and Design Laboratory, Clark Atlanta University. "It also allows my students to be skillful in their design thinking process, which resulted in an IBM digital badge certificate and a stackable credential for their future endeavors."

"We truly value the IBM skills programs and have benefitted from the Academic Initiative, Skills Academy and Global University Awards across all five campuses," saidDr. Derrick Warren, Interim Associate Dean and MBA Director, Southern University. "Over 24 faculty and staff have received instructor training and more than 300 students now have micro-certifications in AI, cloud, cybersecurity, data science, design thinking, Internet of Things, quantum computing and other offerings."

"At UNCF, we have a history of supporting HBCUs as they amplify their outsized impact on the Black community, and our work would not be possible without transformational partnerships with organizations like IBM and their IBM Global University Programs," said Ed Smith-Lewis, Executive Director of UNCF's Institute for Capacity Building. "We are excited to bring the resources of IBM to HBCUs, their faculty, and their students."

"IBM Skills Academy is an ideal platform for faculty to teach their students the latest in computing and internet technologies," said Dr. Sridhar Malkaram, West Virginia State University. "It helped the students in my Applied Data Mining course experience the state of the art in data science methods and analysis tools. The course completion badge/certificate has been an additional and useful incentive for students, which promoted their interest. The Skills Academy courses can be advantageously adapted by faculty, either as stand-alone courses or as part of existing courses."

About IBM:IBM is a leading global hybrid cloud, AI and business services provider. We help clients in more than 175 countries capitalize on insights from their data, streamline business processes, reduce costs and gain the competitive edge in their industries. For more information visit: https://newsroom.ibm.com/home.

*King, Michael, Anthony Marshall, Dave Zaharchuk. "Pursuit of relevance: How higher education remains viable in today's dynamic world." IBM Institute for Business Value. Accessed March 23, 2021. https://www.ibm.com/thought-leadership/institute-business-value/report/education-relevance

**Source: National Center for Education Statistics, Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System

IBM Media RelationsContact:Carrie Bendzsa[emailprotected]+1613-796-3880

SOURCE IBM

http://www.ibm.com

Continue reading here:
IBM Extends HBCU Initiatives Through New Industry Collaborations - PRNewswire

Bill Maher Says Democrats Suck The Fun Out Of Everything: Halloween, The Oscars, Childhood – Deadline

Democrats are now the party that cant tell the difference between Anthony Weiner and Al Franken, said Bill Maher at the close of Real Time on Friday night. He went on to bemoan the increasing rigidity of the Left and the increasing, well, liberalism of the Right.

Once upon a time the Right were offended by everything. They were the party of speech codes and black lists and moral panics and demanding some TV show had to go. Now thats us. Were the fun-suckers now. We suck the fun out of everything: Halloween, the Oscars, childhood, twitter, comedy.

Maher continued as part of his New Rules segment, American government works best like a mullet: Republicans do business in the front, Democrats party in the back.

[GOP Congresswoman] Marjorie Taylor Green is reportedly into polyamorous tantric sex, said the disbelieving host. And Ashley Babbitt, the MAGA warrior who died storming the capitol was apparently part of a thruple.

Thats a long way, said Maher, from when Jerry Falwell blasted the Teletubbies because one of them was allegedly gay because it was purple.

[Former Democratic Congresswoman] Katie Hillwho, like Ashley Babbitt, was found to be part of a thruple and pictured holding a bongthat was too much for our new puritanical Democratic Party.

Were the thruple people! The bong people! The tantric sex gurus! enjoined Maher. We did f*cking in the mud [at Woodstock] and bra burning and turn on and tune in and drop out. Theyre the party who wont bake wedding cakes for gay people!

Its time to switch back, he said in closing, because frankly, youre not good at being us and being you sucks.

You can watch Maher deliver his New Rules diatribe below.

Original post:
Bill Maher Says Democrats Suck The Fun Out Of Everything: Halloween, The Oscars, Childhood - Deadline