Media Search:



Automated Social Media Moderation In Focus Following Allegations Of Censorship – BroadbandBreakfast.com

June 2, 2021Social media platforms that have automated moderation policies have been wittingly or unwittingly censoring legitimate speech, according to activists, with those corporate tools coming into focus following last months violence in the Middle East.

Platforms like Facebook and its subsidiary Instagram, as well as others, have moderation systems that automatically flag and remove posts that may encourage hate speech or violence.

But those systems has been taking down, blocking and censoring content from Palestinians, made evident as violence erupted between Israelis and Palestinians last month and continues today, according to a panel hosted by the Middle East Institute Wednesday.

Words have been incorrectly misinterpreted as terrorist speech, flagged and removed, the panelists say. Middle East policy analyst Marwa Fatafta used the example of the erroneous association of Islams third-holiest mosque, Al-Aqsa in Jerusalem, to a terrorist organization. This error led to blocked hashtags, removed users, and deleted posts, and Facebooks response was that it was just a technical glitch.

Their machines are blind to the vital context, Fatafta said. This is not unique to the Palestinians. This is bad news to all aspects of social justice.

Palestinians have said that their perspective has not been reflected adequately in traditional media, and they have taken to social media as a way to get their message across.

The discussion comes as conversations heat up about possible reforms to Section 230, the legal provision governing platform liability for what users posts.

In a time of such violence, Fatafta explains this is a profound problem from a human rights perspective that needs to be addressed immediately by these large companies. She said the danger of the power being given to these big tech companies is that hey can choose the narrative they want the world to hear, and censor what they deem unacceptable.

Ignacio Delgado Culebras, a journalist covering the Middle East and North Africa, said there needs to be more transparency with these social media platforms. He explained we are still left in the dark about how companies make these decisions and who they consult with, and thousands of requests over the years to adjust the community standards have been denied.

These are ultimately human policy decisions, and they can be addressed or reversed, said Eliza Campbell, an associate director at the Middle East Institute. These are systems that we chose, and we can choose to reconsider them, and hopefully, that will be something we can see going forward.

Go here to see the original:
Automated Social Media Moderation In Focus Following Allegations Of Censorship - BroadbandBreakfast.com

A Toronto artist’s painting symbolized censorship of women. In 1991, Toronto police ordered it removed – TheSpec.com

Twenty years ago, Toronto police ordered a series of degrading paintings to be pulled from the window of a Queen Street East shop, after neighbourhood residents complained.

The paintings (and their creator Ann-Marie Cheung) are pictured here in this 1991 photo by the Toronto Stars Jim Wilkes. The paintings depicted bare-breasted, blue-tinged women bound by chains and thorny rope, with their long ethereal hair escaping restraint.

Razzle Cameron, the manager of the shop Kiss Kiss Bang Bang, agreed to remove the paintings to stay out of trouble. However, Cameron did not agree with the complaint, noting at the time that a strip club down the block was not being painted with the same brush.

Cheung remembers feeling rather surprised and found it quite humorous that some people could be so offended by a work of art. But the censorship of her work did not amuse: I was angered that my freedom of expression was stripped from me.

These paintings by Cheung had been displayed without incident at an Ottawa art gallery three years earlier. However, it seemed that Toronto audiences were more sensitive.

As an artist, Cheung says, it is my job to evoke an emotional response. In that case I was successful; but, it wasnt my initial intention.

Today, Cheung lives just outside of Toronto, with a home studio in which she can continue to paint the goddess and explore the divine feminine.

Reflecting on those controversial pieces, Cheung describes them as painted in a surreal symbolist style. She explains, The one in chains was personifying how women are chained to certain roles. The one blindfolded and bound was ironically about censorship, symbolizing how our eyes and hands are restricted. To this day she maintains there was nothing sexual or pornographic about the pieces.

There is certainly nothing unusual or new about depictions of nude women in fine art, neither today nor when Cheung painted these pieces. At art school we study and draw and paint from live nude models, says Cheung, who graduated from the Ontario College of Art and Design in Toronto. I feel that it is the artists right to express and interpret anything they desire.

Cheung sees her mission as an artist as one of release. I help adventurous spirits create a joyful, magical space in their lives with my unique, vibrant, whimsical artwork, she says. And, Cheung believes we all have an inner artist eager to come out and play. She produces workshops and programs to guide others in their own sacred painting practice, even those with no artistic experience.

As unconventional today as she was 20 years ago, Cheung is also a certified yoga instructor, is learning to scuba dive, and hopes to hold in-person art retreats once the pandemic is over. She looks forward to encouraging artistic expression through exploring ancient symbols, meditations and exercises that will ignite creative spark and help others, as well as herself, connect with the art that is your life.

Loading...Loading...Loading...Loading...Loading...

Read the rest here:
A Toronto artist's painting symbolized censorship of women. In 1991, Toronto police ordered it removed - TheSpec.com

Legislative Roundup: Sales tax collections amendment headed to voters; sports betting clears House; social media censorship bill falters – The Current

Sales tax collection amendment headed to voters

The proposed constitutional amendment to consolidate local sales tax collections under state control cleared its last hurdles Thursday when the House and Senate unanimously and almost simultaneously approved the compromise version worked out in a conference committee.

The conference report on House Speaker Clay Schexnayders HB199 was approved 101-0 in the House and 37-0 in the Senate.

Rep. Beau Beaullieu, R-New Iberia, whose district includes part of southern Lafayette Parish, served as House floor manager. He explained that the bill creates an eight-member commission to oversee consolidated sales tax collections. It will require a two-thirds vote by the commission, followed by a two-thirds vote in each house of the Legislature, to alter the sales tax laws without the need for a constitutional amendment.

We dont touch any of the revenue levied by local authorities, he said in answer to a question from the back mic.

After the unanimous vote, Beaullieu thanked the members and said, Youve made a big deal for the state of Louisiana today.

It will appear on the midterm election ballot on Nov. 8, 2022.

The House delayed a final vote Thursday on another of Schexnayders projects, HCR40, which would direct the Department of Economic Development and the State Board of Commerce to suspend tax incentives, subsidies and other public financial support for solar projects not regulated by the Public Service Commission. The House was scheduled to vote on the Senates amended version. It will likely be brought back up when the House reconvenes on Monday.

A slightly amended version of SB247 by Senate President Page Cortez, R-Lafayette, which sets up the ground rules for legalized sports wagering, cleared the House Thursday, but only after several members hurled some questions at its House sponsor, Rep. John Stefanski, R-Crowley.

The bill had been amended to include wagering on horse racing at all licensed locations. In the original, it would have been available only at riverboat casinos, not land-based ones, Stefanski said.

Rep. Larry Frieman, R-Abita Springs, asked Stefanski why the bill has a cap of 20 licenses when sports wagering was approved by local option in 55 parishes last November. Stefanski explained that he and Cortez put a lot of thought and effort into the bill and acknowledged that it will create dead zones for legal sports wagering in the state.

If you dont have a cap, youll have a casino on every corner, and thats not the intent of this, Stefanski said. We thought it would be in the best interest of the state. This is a good starting point.

Rep. Robby Carter, D-Amite, extracted an assurance from Stefanski that the bill will not hurt my horse racers.

If anything it will help the horse racers, Stefanski told him.

SB247 passed 78-15. Six of Lafayette Parishs seven representatives voted for it; Rep. Stuart Bishop was absent.

The bill gives priority for the 20 licenses to the existing 16 riverboat casinos and four land-based casinos under state jurisdiction.

It now goes back to the Senate to concur in the House amendments or reject them. The original version passed the Senate 31-6 on May 19.

In a rare move that may be a bellwether of the Houses opinion of the bill, the House on Thursday voted down a motion to direct the Commerce Committee to report a bill that would allow Louisianians to sue social media companies for censoring their religious or political opinions.

The motion to discharge the bill from committee was rejected 25-38, with 42 members abstaining. Among the Lafayette delegation, Republican Reps. Beau Beaullieu and Julie Emerson voted to force the bill out of committee, Republican Jonathan Goudeau and Democrat Vincent Pierre voted against it and Republicans Stuart Bishop and Jean-Paul Coussan and Democrat Marcus Bryant abstained.

Speaker Clay Schexnayder voted nay, something he seldom does.

SB196 by Sen. Jay Morris, R-West Monroe, has been controversial from the start. It initially fell one vote short of the 20 votes needed to clear the Senate early in the session, but it eventually passed 37-0 on May 20. It has since bounced around the House like a pinball. On May 20, Schexnayder referred it first to the Civil Law and Procedure Committee, where it languished for a week without a hearing before being discharged on Wednesday and recommitted to the Commerce Committee. No hearing has been scheduled, and with less than a week until the end of the session its chances of passage appear remote.

The bill would have authorized up to $75,000 in actual civil damages to plaintiffs who can prove a social media company has censored their content.

HCR51 by Rep. Mark Wright, R-Covington, which calls for a national constitutional convention to establish unspecified term limits for the U.S. House and Senate, was tabled in the Senate Thursday on a 21-13 vote.

It also faced stiff vocal opposition in the House, where it passed 66-23 on May 24.

Sen. Edward Price, D-Gonzales, warned that this is a very, very scary path to open up the Constitution. We need to be very careful doing this.

Sen. Jay Morris, R-West Monroe, recalled that after this resolution came up last session, several members were intimidated. I dont know who was behind it, Morris said, but I move to table.

Two of Lafayette Parishs senators, Republican Bob Hensgens and Democrat Gerald Boudreaux, voted to table. Senate President Page Cortez, R-Lafayette, abstained.

Go here to see the original:
Legislative Roundup: Sales tax collections amendment headed to voters; sports betting clears House; social media censorship bill falters - The Current

US ‘Ruling class used the threat of disease to consolidate its power’; used censorship, riots: Ben Domenech – Fox News

On Friday's "Fox News Primetime", host Ben Domenech sounded off on how the establishment the political and corporate ruling class used the threat of a virus to consolidate and expand its power with the help of violent riots, widespread propaganda, and tech censorship.

DOMENECH: Human actions and decisions made the real-life costs of the pandemic far higher than they otherwise might have been. They unnecessarily erased an entire year of education, destroyed small businesses, and wrecked huge portions of our economy. Instead, it was Americas innovation industry that won the day, in ways the corporate propaganda press last year deemed impossible, all the way up until the vaccines were here.

The ruling class used the threat of disease to consolidate its power, and it has used lies, violent riots, re-education, corporate media propaganda and tech censorship to achieve this -- but it is a house that cannot stand because it is built on nothing but threats and the kind of shameless hubris weve had to see to believe. The Wuhan lab leak theory, dismissed by Anthony Fauci and the Washington Post and CNN, is gaining traction now is a cause for outrage at elite hypocrisy and dishonesty.

Read the rest here:
US 'Ruling class used the threat of disease to consolidate its power'; used censorship, riots: Ben Domenech - Fox News

Georgia Board of Education Votes to Censor American History – The Intercept – First Look Media

Slavery is not just something that just happened with the people who were white to people who were Black, said Lisa Kinnemore, a member of Georgias state board of education, as it deliberated a resolution on Thursday restricting classroom discussion of racism. Black people were actually slaves to Black people. It goes all the way to back even to ancient times, slavery in Egypt and Rome and all around the world.

This sentiment an explicit rejection of the horrors of American slavery and its roots in white supremacy underpinned the 11 to 2 vote by the board to adopt a resolution to provide a framework for policy revisions on the teaching of race and sex in Georgias classrooms.

Kinnemores comments left Jason Esteves, chair of the Atlanta Public Schools Board of Education, momentarily speechless as discussed the vote with The Intercept shortly after the meeting.

Look, this wont impact [Atlanta Public Schools], he said. Were going to keep doing what were doing. This will have an effect on counties that are more conservative, that were still making moves toward equity and inclusion.

Parents mostly white have been storming school board meetings across the state over the last few weeks, heeding a call by conservative demagogues to fight against critical race theory being taught in schools. Gov. Brian Kemp wrote a letter to the state board of education last month, calling critical race theory a divisive, anti-American agenda which has no place in Georgia classrooms. Kemp echoes a wave of protests across the country over the last two months, from rich Virginia suburbanites launching a campaign to oust the state school board to a disrupted meeting in Scottsdale, Arizona, with parents protesting mask mandates unmasked, of course along with critical race theory.

In practice, these white parents havent been railing against the arcane legal theory but against the idea that students should be taught that racism is a real, current problem created by longstanding structural inequality. Local school board meetings have devolved into vitriolic shouting matches, with boards looking for ways to control public comment afterward.

The board drafted the resolution without public input and then blocked comments from the YouTube livestream. Impassioned pleas, it seems, are fit only for those on one side of this argument.

Eventually what they want is for people not to talk about it any more.

There was so much energy and excitement behind, finally, making some movement toward those issues, Esteves said. Were now seeing a complete reversal. The state board of education just took away their cover and gave opponents a weapon to use against those efforts. Eventually what they want is for people not to talk about it any more.

About three out of five of Georgias public school students are children of color. Demography projects Georgia will become a majority-minority state within the next decade. But even as Republicans continue to argue against the legitimacy of the November election, the political reality remains: a purple state on the knifes edge of flipping permanently Democratic because it has run out of racially resentful white voters.

Kemp and others have begun to implicitly draw a connection between the eroding defense of white supremacy among white voters and their own political futures by describing anti-racist education initiatives as inherently political. Basically, theyre saying the quiet part out loud.

Take Kinnemore, for example. Then-Gov. Nathan Deal appointed Kinnemore to the board in 2013 after her kamikaze run against a well-respected local Democratic legislator in DeKalb County.

Kinnemore, who is Black, lives about a mile due south from my house, in a community that is about 90 percent Black, in the shadow of the largest memorial to the Confederacy in America. I note in passing that the keepers of the Stone Mountain carving have been open to recontextualizing the monument despite the wailing of Lost Cause revisionists, because the redolent racism of the carvings history is noxious. Those white supremacists are Kinnemores audience. Her political existence is a 4Chan-style trolling operation designed to elicit pain from Black parents for the amusement of white supremacists.

Her appointment is in no way an attempt to build support for conservative politics among nonwhite voters. Republicans do not have a plan for that here. Instead, they hope to preserve the racial biases of young white voters intact as long as they can, staving off losses as older white conservatives die and younger ones change after contact with the real world.

The resolution contains language barring instruction in ways that suggest that racism is acceptable. But it also says the state school board believes that no teacher, administrator, or other school employee should offer instruction suggesting that meritocracy or traits such as a hard work ethic are racist or sexist, or were created by a members of a particular race to oppress members of another race; (or) that the advent of slavery in the territory that is now the United States constituted the true founding of the United States; or that, with respect to their relationship to American values, slavery and racism are anything other than deviations from, betrayals of, or failures to live up to, the authentic founding principles of the United States, which include liberty and equality.

How one teaches the political dimension of slavery on the crafting of the Constitution, with the three-fifths compromise, the ramifications of the Civil War, the lingering effects of Jim Crow, the Trail of Tears and the reservation system, turn of the century anti-Asian discrimination, the civil rights movement, and the many, many other facets of white supremacist ideology on America is a lesson left to the readers imagination.

The resolution does not itself impose standards for the states schools,Georgia educationboard chair Scott Sweeney said. It does not mention critical race theory per se. This is not something going directly after critical race theory. What it is trying to do is draw a distinction between divisive ideologies in finding their way into standards. This is a foundational statement more than anything else. With regard to divisiveness, for example, can you imagine any supremacist ideology making its way into standards? I cannot. So, this is agnostic with regard to those types of divisiveness.

The nature of racism today is what is left unsaid and unexamined. One has to assume there is no white supremacist ideology baked into the current curriculum for his statement to be considered true.

The boards vote drew swift condemnation.

The nature of racism today is what is left unsaid and unexamined.

The prohibitions outlined in the resolution would undermine Holocaust education in Georgia, said Allison Padilla-Goodman, vice president of the southern division at the Anti-Defamation League. Indeed, it could prohibit teaching that the Nuremburg laws were taken from Jim Crow America. The resolution is fundamentally contradictory. It claims to respect First Amendment rights and strongly encourages educators, who teach about controversial public policy or social affairs issues, to explore them from diverse and contending perspectives. Yet, the resolution clearly would prohibit a teacher or student from talking about systemic racism or inequity in America. And the resolution is so vaguely written that it undoubtedly will come under constitutional challenge and may suffer the same fate as President Trumps divisive concepts executive order.

Discussions about race and its place in our history and in current events are an important part of education and one that Georgia educators will continue to address, added Craig Harper, executive director of the Professional Association of Georgia Educators. The non-binding resolution adopted at a special called session of the State Board of Education does not prohibit educators from continuing to teach and discuss all aspects of our history as they do now. The board members conversation highlighted the importance of including more people and perspectives. Our many communities and educators, who have valuable insights and expertise, must work together to determine how Georgia will address these critical issues moving forward.

Esteves expects teachers to gear up for a fight.

Teachers can speak out and talk about how this limits their ability to have really important conversations in their classrooms, he said. School boards can affirm their commitment to equity and inclusion. They can resist any efforts to disrupt or pause equity initiatives.

Original post:
Georgia Board of Education Votes to Censor American History - The Intercept - First Look Media