Media Search:



Notice of Community Meeting for the City of Oakland’s 2021/22 Annual – City of Oakland

In addition to the upcoming public meeting and public review period for the 2021/22 Annual Action Plan and First Amendment to the Five Year Consolidated Plan for FY 2020/21 through 2024/25, City staff is offering a Virtual Community Meeting on Monday, June 14, 2021 from 1:30pm - 2:30pm to discuss the City of Oaklands Fiscal Year (FY) 2021/22 Annual Action Plan and the First Amendment to the Five Year Consolidated Plan (Con Plan) for FY 2020/21 through 2024/25.

To observe or participate in this virtual community meeting, join us online at:

https://us02web.zoom.us/j/82404930201

Meeting ID: 824 0493 0201

Or Dial by your location

+1 669 900 6833 US (San Jose)

+1 346 248 7799 US (Houston)

+1 253 215 8782 US (Tacoma)

+1 301 715 8592 US (Washington DC)

+1 312 626 6799 US (Chicago)

+1 929 205 6099 US (New York)

The Annual Action Plan accepts and appropriates funds appropriated to the City of Oakland under the FY 2021/22 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), HOME Investments Partnership (HOME), Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG), Housing Opportunities for Persons With AIDS (HOPWA) programs.

The First Substantial Amendment to the 2020/21 - 2024/25 Five Year Consolidated Plan (Con Plan) includes the following modifications to the Con Plan, including the FY 2020/21 AAP portion of the Con Plan:

1. Performance Period of HOPWA projects;

2. List of Planned Backup Projects to fund with CDBG if there are CDBG projects completed under budget, delayed or canceled; and

3. Neighborhood Stabilization Program reallocation of $326,581 fund balance and related actions required.

For further information on the Plans, public review periods, and the upcoming City Council/Public Hearing please go to https://www.oaklandca.gov/services/annual-action-plan-21-22 .

Read the original here:
Notice of Community Meeting for the City of Oakland's 2021/22 Annual - City of Oakland

University of Iowa professors say new law prohibiting ‘divisive concepts’ misrepresents critical race theory – UI The Daily Iowan

The state Board of Regents will review processes to ensure compliance with the new law prohibiting divisive concepts and critical race theory.

Ryan Adams for the Daily Iowan

Gov. Kim Reynolds listens to Senate President Jake Chapman speak during the State of the State address in the house chamber of the Iowa State Capitol on Tuesday, Jan. 12, 2021 in Des Moines. Gov. Reynolds highlighted in the address expansion of broadband internet, a push for in-person learning, and economic recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic.

Iowa Gov. Kim Reynolds signed a bill into law June 8 that will prohibit teaching critical race theory and divisive concepts in K-12 and higher education, in school curricula, and in mandatory diversity, equity, and inclusion training.

Venise Berry, the University of Iowa African American Studies department chair, said critical race theory is misunderstood. She said critical race theory highlights certain elements that are tied to race that are critical and important for Americans to pay attention to.

Teaching critical race theory is not about telling white students theyre racist, Berry said. Its about helping all students understand the environment that we live in and experience in this system. That its positive, in relation to race, but also its negative in relation to race.

Josh Lehman, the state Board of Regents senior communications director, wrote in an email to The Daily Iowan that the regents and Iowas regent-governed universities will review processes to ensure compliance with the new law.

The Board and our universities strongly believe in free expression, and have spoken out frequently in their support of free speech and the First Amendment, Lehman wrote to the DI. We will continue to fight for the rights of all students, faculty, and staff to have all voices and opinions heard. We must hear all viewpoints without stifling speech.

The law (HF 802), effective July 1, covers nine divisive concepts in training and education.

Leslie Schwalm, chair of the Department of Gender, Womens, and Sexuality Studies at the UI, said as someone who teaches about systemic racism and the history of institutionalized racism, the prohibited divisive concepts are irrelevant to her course curricula.

No one teaches that members of a race or sex are inherently racist, sexist, or oppressive, Schwalm said. In fact, one of the things that critical race theory helps us understand is that racism isnt about individual acts of discrimination, but rather about the system.

While the new law prohibits divisive concepts, the term critical race theory is not stated in the bill.

In a statement from June 8 regarding the law, Reynolds said, Critical race theory is about labels and stereotypes, not education.

According to June 9 data from Chalkbeat, Republican governors or legislators in 21 state governments have proposed or passed legislation across the country to restrict education on racism, bias, the contributions of specific racial or ethnic groups to U.S. history, or related topics.

Berry said the law and other censoring instances could lead UI faculty of color to leave.

Laws like these are the kinds of things faculty of color look at when they interview and apply, Berry said. I just would like to see our state government focus more on the needs of the people than on these culture issues that they blow out of proportion.

View post:
University of Iowa professors say new law prohibiting 'divisive concepts' misrepresents critical race theory - UI The Daily Iowan

YouTube took down Ron Johnson’s controversial remarks on COVID-19. The Milwaukee Press Club has reposted the entire interview. – Milwaukee Journal…

Republican U.S. Sen. Ron Johnson speaks to the Milwaukee Press Club, June 3, 2021.(Photo: Milwaukee Press Club screen grab)

The Milwaukee Press Club circumvented a YouTube ban and has now posted on its websitea controversial interview with Republican U.S. Sen. Ron Johnson.

On Friday, Johnson was suspended from uploading videos to YouTube after the company said he violated the website's COVID-19 "medical misinformation policies."

Johnson made the comments in questionduring a June 3 appearance with the Milwaukee Press Club.

The full video was also taken down from the press club's YouTube site, with an accompanying message that said it wasremoved "for violating YouTube's community guidelines."

In a statement issued Sunday, the press club said:"As an organization that includes journalists as well as others who strongly support our nations First Amendment, the Milwaukee Press Club believes it is extremely important to provide information on topics of interest regardless of their political perspective.

"Its also important to note, while we do provide this access, we do not endorse the positions of our Newsmakers or any other guests who speak at our programs."

The Milwaukee Press Club states it is"the oldest continuously operated press club in North America."

In taking down Johnson's remarks, aYouTube spokesperson said: "We removed the video in accordance with our COVID-19 medical misinformation policies, which dont allow content that encourages people to use Hydroxychloroquine or Ivermectin to treat or prevent the virus."

According to a copy of its policy statement: "YouTube doesn't allow content that spreads medical misinformation that contradicts local health authorities or the World Health Organizations (WHO) medical information about COVID-19."

During the nearly hour-long interview, Johnson was asked a range of policy questions. According to his office, the segment that ran afoul of YouTube came in response to a question on some of his views on COVID-19 treatments.

During the appearance, Johnson criticized the Trump and Biden administrations for "not only ignoring but working against robust research (on) the use of cheap, generic drugs to be repurposed for early treatment of COVID."

In a tweet, Johnson expressed support for the press club's reposting of the video.

"I think they're right," he said. "Interesting YouTube doesn't agree."

Our subscribers make this reporting possible. Please consider supporting local journalism by subscribing to the Journal Sentinel at jsonline.com/deal.

Read or Share this story: https://www.jsonline.com/story/news/politics/2021/06/14/milwaukee-press-club-posts-ron-johnson-video-prompted-youtube-ban/7688524002/

Continue reading here:
YouTube took down Ron Johnson's controversial remarks on COVID-19. The Milwaukee Press Club has reposted the entire interview. - Milwaukee Journal...

European Soccer Stars Refuse to Yield to Racist Fans Who Jeer Them for Taking a Knee – The Intercept

A smattering of boos was drowned out by applause in Londons Wembley Stadium on Sunday, as Englands best soccer players were both jeered and celebrated by their fans for taking a knee to protest racism before the national teams match against Croatia in the European Championship tournament.

While the Croatian players chose not to make the gesture, the Italian referee and his assistants joined the English team and their coaching staff in kneeling for a few seconds before kickoff.

One day earlier, there had been much louder boos when Belgiums multiracial national team, joined by Spanish match officials, had taken a knee before playing Russia in St. Petersburg in the same tournament.

Last week in Budapest, which is one of the host cities for the tournament, Hungarian fans booed Irelands national team for the same gesture before a warm-up match against Hungary.

The dissent from a section of the crowd in London on Sunday was noticeably less intense than it had been before two pre-tournament matches in Middlesbrough last week, when the English players were jeered along with the national teams of Austria and Romania which joined them in kneeling.

That pitiful display, from fans unable to separate racism from patriotism, had prompted an articulate plea for tolerance from the England manager, Gareth Southgate, who said that the squad was united in its determination to keep taking a knee throughout the tournament.

The English Football Association, the sports governing body, then explicitly connected the booing to racist abuse directed at Black players on social media in a video message that urged fans to unite behind a team representing a multiethnic, multiracial England.

While the jeering racists were largely drowned out on Sunday and England won the match,thanks to a goal created by a player of Jamaican and Irish descentand scored by a Londoner who was born in Jamaica it was hard not to notice, as Daniel Taylor of The Athletic observed, that the bar is set particularly low these days if English football feels this pathetically grateful that this weeks booing of anti-racism was not as loud as last weeks.

It is also hard to miss the extent to which this entire scenario, now repeating itself in nation after nation across Europe, is an offshoot of Americas culture war.

Turning Point UK, an offshoot of the American pro-Trump youth organization, gleefully shared video of fans booing on social media, although the right-wing activists had to cut away abruptly from the original BBC video just three seconds into the protest, to conceal from viewers that the boos were quickly overwhelmed by cheers.

The gesture, inspired by the blacklisted NFL quarterback Colin Kaepernicks defiant protest, has been part of the pre-match ritual at soccer matches in England since last June. As racial justice protests spread worldwide following the murder of George Floyd, David McGoldrick, a Black British player with Irish roots, suggested that players should take a knee before kickoff.

The idea quickly spread across the country, and for months, players knelt in somber silence, in stadiums kept empty during the height of the coronavirus pandemic, many of which added signs displaying the slogan Black Lives Matter. But since the return of fans to English stadiums, loud boos and angry shouts have frequently been heard as players took the knee.

In heated debates online and across the airwaves, far-right figures in England, like the pro-Brexit campaigners Nigel Farage and Darren Grimes, have refused to draw the obvious conclusion that people who are incensed by an anti-racist protest might just be racist.

To defend the English fans jeering their own players, Farage and Grimes have drawn attention to the fact that Patrisse Cullors, the American activist who turned the phrase Black Lives Matter into a Facebook hashtag in 2013 following the acquittal of Trayvon Martins killer, George Zimmerman once described herself as a Marxist.

Although the English, Belgian and Irish players have made it clear that they are kneeling to show support for anti-racist protesters united by the slogan Black Lives Matter, rather than the Black Lives Matter Global Network Foundation co-created by Cullors, Farage and Grimes argue that the booing fans are not racists, just staunch opponents of Marxism.

The idea that ultranationalist soccer fans, who have aimed racist jeers at nonwhite players for years, are really engaged in ideological debate has been widely ridiculed, but conspiratorial fears about the supposedly hidden influence of cultural Marxism have been deeply embedded in far-right thinking for decades and were cited repeatedly in the manifesto of the far-right Norwegian gunman Anders Breivik, who killed 77 people in 2011.

Still, far-right activists, including the actor-turned-politician Laurence Fox, continue to invoke Marxism as a specter haunting Europe a decade after Breiviks killing spree.

A handful of fans even gathered outside the stadium on Sunday beside a version of the national flag with the slogan Dont Kneel for Marxism scrawled on it. One man standing near the flag wore a Trump-style red cap, complete with the phrase Make Britain Great Again.

Unfortunately for Farage and Grimes, an explicitly white supremacist, anti-immigrant group with rhetoric that closely echoes Breivik also turned up at the stadium to urge players to Stop kneeling for migrants & their descendants!

The reaction from Belgian and Hungarian politicians has also echoed the rhetoric of the American far-right. Filip Dewinter, the former leader of Vlaams Belang, a xenophobic Flemish party with thinly veiled white supremacist beliefs, exulted over video of fans of the English club side Millwall booing their own players as soon as they were allowed back into their stadium in December.

Tom Vandendriessche, a member of the European parliament for Dewinters party, shared a meme on Twitter last week that showed the Hungarian crowd booing the Irish team over the words All Lives Matter, and added the comment: BLM = racism.

The fact it was booed was incomprehensible, Irelands manager, Stephen Kenny, said after that match. It doesnt reflect well on Hungary and the Hungarian support, he added. The Irish striker Adam Idah, whose father is Nigerian, was also shocked. Obviously, its disappointing to see the fans and the whole stadium booing us taking the knee, he told reporters. Its for a good cause, trying to stop racism. Its a sign to kick racism out of society and just the reaction was very disappointing for us. We werent expecting that.

Viktor Orbn, Hungarys xenophobic prime minister, responded by attacking the Irish team that traveled to Budapest to help the Hungarians prepare for the tournament. If you are a guest in a country, then understand its culture, dont provoke the locals, dont provoke the host if you visit as a guest, Orbn said. We cant interpret this gesture in any other way, Orbn added, than as a provocation.

The Hungarian prime minister then suggested that since Hungary never had slaves, its citizens have no responsibility to combat racism.

After the Belgian national team took the knee in Russia on Saturday, before a 3-0 win, Vandendriessche tweeted that the Russian players, who remained standing during the protest, had lost the game but at least not their dignity. Kneeling is submission. BLM is pure racism. ALL lives matter!

Originally posted here:
European Soccer Stars Refuse to Yield to Racist Fans Who Jeer Them for Taking a Knee - The Intercept

Politics Podcast: The Republican Establishment Has Had Trouble Swaying Its Voters. The Democratic Establishment Keeps Winning. – FiveThirtyEight

Virginia and New Jersey are the only two states that hold regularly scheduled gubernatorial and state legislative elections in 2021, and both states had primaries on June 8. Those elections were something of a test between competing parts of each party and potentially a preview of the kinds of candidates who will run in 2022.

In this installment of the FiveThirtyEight Politics podcast, the crew discusses the results as well as the broader debate playing out between the two parties over how much wealthy Americans and corporations should be paying in taxes. They also consider whether a new poll showing a rebound in Americas reputation abroad is a good or bad use of polling.

You can listen to the episode by clicking the play button in the audio player above or bydownloading it in iTunes, theESPN Appor your favorite podcast platform. If you are new to podcasts,learn how to listen.

The FiveThirtyEight Politics podcast is recorded Mondays and Thursdays. Help new listeners discover the show byleaving us a rating and review on iTunes. Have a comment, question or suggestion for good polling vs. bad polling? Get in touch by email,on Twitteror in the comments.

Link:
Politics Podcast: The Republican Establishment Has Had Trouble Swaying Its Voters. The Democratic Establishment Keeps Winning. - FiveThirtyEight