Media Search:



Making sure the big people pay their taxes would be a boost to democracy – The Guardian

In June 2016, while researching an article for Vanity Fair, I asked Donald Trump if he was using tax havens to escape tax. I know a lot about tax havens, but I dont use them, he told me. There is greater incentive in many ways to keep your money in the United States.

Fellow billionaires may chuckle, because they know this too, following decades of attacks by special interests on the US tax system. Their goal, as the Texas Republican congressman Bill Archer once said, has been to pull it out by its roots and throw it away so it can never grow back.

Last week, the investigative journalism body ProPublica released shocking new evidence of how easy it is for US billionaires to escape paying tax. Using leaked tax records, it reported that Amazons Jeff Bezos, the publisher Michael Bloomberg, the corporate raider Carl Icahn, Teslas founder, Elon Musk, and the financial investor George Soros all paid zero federal income taxes in some years. From 2014-2018 the richest 25 Americans, many of them monopolists, saw their wealth surge by more than $400bn, while paying taxes worth just 3.4% of that. Meanwhile, average American wage earners in their 40s saw their wealth rise by $65,000 and paid $62,000 in tax.

How do the billionaires get away with it?

Loopholes, is one answer. Trumps tax advisers used copious gaps in real-estate tax laws and stunts such as putting goats on a golf course in New Jersey to qualify for farmland tax reliefs. Another trick is to take a carefully primed asset currently worth almost nothing, push it into a tax-free retirement account just under the contribution limit on the account like putting it through the eye of a needle, in the words of the South Dakota Trust Company owner, Pierce McDowell then flick a financial switch and watch its value explode, tax-free, once safely inside the account.

There are many others. But the really big loophole is this. Lesser mortals pay tax on salaries. Billionaires avoid grubby salaries or even income. Instead, they own assets that rise in value and the rise, those unrealised gains, escape tax. Those richest 25 Americans owned $1.1tn in wealth in 2018 equivalent to the wealth of 14.3 million average Americans yet paid only $1.9bn in personal federal taxes. The 14.3 million little people paid $143bn, or 75 times as much.

In Britain, the situation is similar. Billionaires own assets instead of earning income, and generally dont pay tax when those assets rise in value.

We have many other loopholes. Here, UK billionaires can outdo their American counterparts in some ways. The weirdest is surely the archaic non-dom rule, a legacy of empire, where wealthy residents of the UK who can claim that their domicile is elsewhere only pay tax on their income that arises inside or is brought into the UK. (So they carefully make sure that any income stays offshore.)

The bigger British speciality is, of course, tax havens. We protect and nurture some of the worlds biggest, from the Cayman Islands to the British Virgin Islands to Jersey. Americans use tax havens too, but they loom far larger in British billionaires tax-escape strategies, often in a legal grey zone. (Trumps main tax haven strategy, my investigation found, was to park multiple corporations in Delaware, a US state boasting strong secrecy and other offshore characteristics.)

What can be done? There is no silver bullet, but a few broad strokes, with appropriate exemptions for the little people, would be wildly popular and economically successful.

First, abolish the non-dom rule, as a sign that we are serious.

Next, bolster the corporation tax, most of which is ultimately paid by wealthier folk. Rishi Sunak admitted recently that George Osbornes cuts to the UKs corporation tax rate from 28% to 19% had failed to bring investment. The cuts have also failed to deliver growth, as Tom Bergin explains in his new book, Free Lunch Thinking. Sunak is pushing corporation tax rates up to 25% now; raise this further still. Meanwhile, G7 leaders have just agreed on measures including a global minimum corporation tax rate of at least 15% to tackle tax havens. The G7 deal faces many hurdles, and leaves little for poorer countries, but its a decent start. Complement this by broadening the tried-and-tested financial transactions tax. A new push on this is now underway.

Wealth taxes, used successfully for years around the world, are essential too. If someone owns 1bn in assets (in shares, gold coins, castles or whatever), a simple 1.5% (say) annual wealth tax earns 15m a year. The UK Wealth Tax Commission estimates that a 1% tax could raise more than 50bn a year: the size of last years extra health funding for Covid. Add to the list a land value tax, another kind of wealth tax.

Equalise tax rates. If we taxed income from wealth at the same rate as income from work, we could raise up to 120bn, about double what we get from corporation tax. As we get braver we should also aim to tax all those unrealised gains so if a billionaires wealth rises, they pay tax on that annually, whether or not they sell (or realise) assets. Some powerful Democrats in the US are now pushing for just this.

In the UK, as in the US, the tax authority has been under attack. HMRC staffing levels have fallen from 105,000 in 2005 to around 60,000 today. Estimates of the tax gap of uncollected taxes range from 35bn to a more credible 90bn a year. Tax collectors repay their salaries many times over. Reinvest in HMRC, and especially focus on taxing the wealthy and multinationals.

Finally, of course, get serious about our crime-infested tax haven racket. This would not only shore up our tax system, our economy and our democracy, but it could be our greatest gift to the world right now, as humanity struggles to overcome the pandemic.

Link:
Making sure the big people pay their taxes would be a boost to democracy - The Guardian

Why Democracies in G7 and NATO Should Reject U.S. Leadership – Progressive.org

The world has been treated to successive spectacles of national leaders gathering at a G7 Summit in Cornwall and a NATO Summit in Brussels.

The U.S. corporate media have portrayed these summits as chances for President Joe Biden to rally the worlds democratic nations in a coordinated response to the most serious problems facing all of us, from the COVID-19 pandemic, climate change, and global inequality to ill-defined threats to democracy from Russia and China.

People around the world share our concerns about the United States dystopian political system and imperial outrages.

But theres something seriously wrong with this picture. Democracy means rule by the people. The exceptional power of wealthy Americans and corporations to influence election results and government policies, however, has led to a de facto system of government that fails to reflect the will of the American people on many critical issues.

So when President Biden meets with the leaders of democratic countries, he represents a country that is, in many ways, an undemocratic outlier rather than a leader among democratic nations. This is evident in:

Fortunately, Americans are not the only ones noticing that something is terribly wrong with U.S. democracy. The Alliance of Democracies Foundation (ADF), founded by former Danish Prime Minister and NATO Secretary-General Anders Fogh Rasmussen, conducted a poll of 50,000 people in fifty-three countries between February and April 2021, and found that people around the world share our concerns about the United States dystopian political system and imperial outrages.

For Americans, the most startling result of the poll might be its finding that more people around the world (44 percent) see the United States as a threat to democracy in their countries than China (38 percent) or Russia (28 percent), which makes nonsense of U.S. efforts to justify its revived Cold War on Russia and China in the name of democracy.

In a larger poll of 124,000 people that ADF conducted in 2020, countries where large majorities saw the United States as a danger to democracy included China, Germany, Austria, Denmark, Ireland, France, Greece, Belgium, Sweden, and Canada.

Biden, after having tea with Queen Elizabeth II at Windsor Castle on June 13 2021, swooped into Brussels on Air Force One for a NATO summit to advance its new Strategic Concept, which is nothing more than a war plan for World War III against both Russia and China.

But we can take solace from evidence that the people of Europe, whom the NATO war plan counts on as front-line troops and mass casualty victims, are not ready to follow President Biden to war.

A January 2021 survey by the European Council on Foreign Affairs found that large majorities of Europeans want to remain neutral in any U.S. war against Russia or China. Only 22 percent would want their country to take the U.S. side in a war on China, and 23 percent in a war on Russia.

Few Americans realize that Biden already came close to war with Russia in March and April, when the United States and NATO supported a new Ukrainian offensive in its civil war against Russian-allied separatists in the Donetsk and Luhansk provinces. Russia moved tens of thousands of heavily armed troops to its borders with Ukraine, to make it clear that it was ready to defend its Ukrainian allies and was quite capable of doing so.

On April 13, Biden blinked, turned around two U.S. destroyers that were steaming into the Black Sea, and called Putin to request the summit that is now taking place.

The antipathy of ordinary people everywhere toward the U.S. determination to provoke military confrontation with Russia and China begs serious questions about the complicity of their leaders in these incredibly dangerous, possibly suicidal, U.S. policies. When ordinary people all over the world can see the dangers and pitfalls of following the United States as a model and a leader, why do their neoliberal leaders keep showing up to lend credibility to the posturing of U.S. leaders at summits like the G7 and NATO?

Maybe it is precisely because the United States has succeeded in what the corporate ruling classes of other nations also aspire tonamely greater concentrations of wealth and power and less public interference in their freedom to accumulate and control them.

Maybe the leaders of other wealthy countries and military powers are genuinely awed by the dystopian American Dream as the example par excellence of how to sell inequality, injustice, and war to the public in the name of freedom and democracy.

In that case, the fact that people in other wealthy countries are not so easily led to war or lured into political passivity and impotence would only increase the awe of their leaders for their U.S. counterparts, who literally laugh all the way to the bank as they pay lip service to the sanctity of the American Dream.

Ordinary people in other countries are right to be wary of the Pied Piper of U.S. leadership, but their rulers should be, too. The fracturing and disintegration of U.S. society should stand as a warning to neoliberal governments and ruling classes everywhere to be more careful what they wish for.

Instead of a world where other countries emulate or fall victim to the United States failed experiment in extreme neoliberalism, the key to a peaceful, sustainable, and prosperous future for all the worlds peopleincluding Americanslies in working together, learning from each other and adopting policies that serve the public good and improve the lives of all, especially those most in need. Theres a name for that. Its called democracy.

More here:
Why Democracies in G7 and NATO Should Reject U.S. Leadership - Progressive.org

How close is America to the end of democracy? – News 1130

How close is America to the end of democracy? - NEWS 1130 Rogers Media uses cookies for personalization, to customize its online advertisements, and for other purposes. Learn more or change your cookie preferences. Rogers Media supports the Digital Advertising Alliance principles. By continuing to use our service, you agree to our use of cookies.We use cookies (why?) You can change cookie preferences. Continued site use signifies consent.

by the big story

Posted Jun 16, 2021 5:22 am PDT

In todays Big Story podcast, many Americans (and Canadians, and citizens around the world) hoped that once Donald Trump was out of office, and Joe Biden became president, the country would experience a snap-back towards political normalcy. That hasnt happened. And driven by their fears of being ousted by Trumps base, Republicans around the country are continuing to push the United States towards the brink.

How did this happen? When did Trumpism become the entire identity of the Republican party? Can America wake up to the threat posed to its most crucial institutions, or is it already too late?

GUEST: Peter Wehner, contributing writer at The Atlantic, senior fellow at the Ethics and Public Policy Center. Peter has worked in the three Republican presidential administrations previous to Trumps.

You can subscribe to The Big Story podcast on Apple Podcasts, Google and Spotify

You can also find it at thebigstorypodcast.ca.

We've sent an email with instructions to create a new password. Your existing password has not been changed.

{* backButton *}{* forgotPassword_sendButton *}

Subscribe to NEWS 1130 newsletters

I understand that I can withdraw my consent at any time

Loading newsletters

{* mergeAccounts *}

{* public_profileBlurb *}

{* public_displayName *}

Updating your profile data...

You have activated your account, please feel free to browse our exclusive contests, videos and content.

You have activated your account, please feel free to browse our exclusive contests, videos and content.

An error has occurred while trying to update your details. Please contact us.

Or

{* traditionalSignIn_signInButton *}

Or

{* backButton *}{* traditionalSignIn_signInButton *}

Please confirm the information below before signing up.

Subscribe to NEWS 1130 newsletters

I understand that I can withdraw my consent at any time

By checking this box, I agree to the terms of service and privacy policy of Rogers Media.

{* backButton *}{* createAccountButton *}

We didn't recognize that password reset code. Enter your email address to get a new one.

Sorry we could not verify that email address. Enter your email below and we'll send you another email.

Or

{* loginWidget *}

Read more here:
How close is America to the end of democracy? - News 1130

Making An Impressive Brand Visibility With Search Engine Optimization: a great investment for most businesses | YorkPedia – York Pedia

Search engine optimization, or SEO, is a great way to make your brand more visible. The Internet has made it so that people dont have to rely on commercials and advertisements to make their brands known. They can do it simply by using SEO.

(YorkPedia Editorial):- Udaipur, Rajasthan Jun 14, 2021 (Issuewire.com)Creating impressive brand visibility is an important step to success. Making a good appearance in Google search engine results is one of the ways to achieve this goal. Web marketing is not enough to be able to promote your brand online if you have no presence in Google SERPs. SEO enables you to achieve the most visibility from search engine results. At a low cost, SEO can ensure your website is optimized for all trending keywords and is the highest-ranked on search engines. Before you start doing SEO, you should first figure out what people are searching for when they look for your product or service.

Good brand identity will make your company easier to remember, and makes it harder for potential competitors to differentiate themselves. Yet in a world full of businesses trying to stand out on their own, it can be tough to be noticed or remembered. Luckily, there is a powerful resource that can help you succeed and stand out from your competitors: SEO. The aim of this article is to provide information on the benefits of SEO for your business and how much it can help you achieve impressive brand visibility. Its important for any business to get its name out there and be seen by as many people as possible. You want people to find your online presence so they can be more aware of what you have to offer. Often when companies market themselves online, they make the mistake of assuming that its enough to just have a website. When most businesses think of online marketing, they rarely look pastSearch Engine Optimizationto gain more clientele.

There are many companies in the world providing SEO services to their clients. When a website owner wants to sell more services and products online then they must contact our SEO Company. Yug Technology is a team of SEO experts working with thousands of clients that our customers across the globe. Our vision is to become the world leader in online marketing and a world-class player in digital marketing solutions. We have a straightforward vision: to establish our reputation as the leaders in SEO services online by helping our customers increase sales or user traffic from their sites, to remain profitable, and to facilitate our rapidly increasing client base to grow their business. Our mission is to provide quality link-building services with intelligent On-Page optimization & creative concept support that help a company in the long term smooth growth in search engine rankings, increased traffic conversion, and satisfaction. Yug technology SEO services had born to provide the bestSEO services in Indiaand internet marketing solutions like Google Ads, Social Media Marketing, Linkedin Marketing, Web Designing, and many more. For more information about the services visit our official websitehttps://www.yugtechnology.com/.

For many years, I worked hard, and a new world opened up. I love tech, I love leading tech projects, and I love the creativity of marketing on digital platforms. After that, I started another company, UDAIPUR WEB DESIGNER, https://www.udaipurwebdesigner.in in 2017, and also a new venture Wow Rajputi Poshak and still working on some more projects. Dont be afraid to experience the unknown. Fear of failure can hinder growth, and actually getting failure can drive success. Even though Ive fallen on my face more than once, Ive learned and grown every time. I am always learning.

Continued here:
Making An Impressive Brand Visibility With Search Engine Optimization: a great investment for most businesses | YorkPedia - York Pedia

Will Ronaldo’s cola snub take the fizz out of Coke’s brand image? – Exchange4Media

If you know anything about Cristiano Ronaldo, you must surely know of his aversion to soft drinks and any unhealthy fast food. In fact, he had admitted that he schools his kids who find joy in these treats.

The legendary footballers dedication to health and fitness and his strong stance against sugary drinks once again became conspicuous at the recent Euro 2020 overnight press conference. Ronaldo removed the two bottles of Coca Cola, one of the events sponsors, from the table in front of him. He then picked up a water bottle and showed it to the cameras saying agua (Portuguese for water), signalling that water is a better choice than soft drinks.

While the player made a strong statement with this move and has been trending on social media sites ever since Brand-nomics MD Viren Razdan feels it was a poor gesture on the Portugal stars part.

Ronaldo's gesture was in poor taste, even if he wants to promote a philosophy he does not have to be rude. Dont know if they (Coke and Ronaldo) have a history, but this was nothing but an immature act. Soccer players have some of the highest endorsement deals - if they wish to propagate a certain thought, I am sure they can do so in a refined manner, says Razdan.

Kofluence Founder Ritesh Ujjwal adds that though the action might improve Ronaldos appeal amongst the fans, brands may start getting a little cautious about their associations with the player.

It was striking to see Ronaldo pushing the approved beverages aside from the table during an official press conference and this might have left few brand managers not-so-happy and rightly so, given the contractual obligations. On the one hand, it does reinforce Ronaldo as someone who is extremely careful of what he intakes and goes on to show that he practices what he preaches. So, this definitely will keep on reinforcing as well as expanding his appeal among his fans. On the other hand, brands would like to keep an eye on associations as they would not like to be caught on the wrong side in any case, he says.

The industry also alludes that the action might not have a significant impact on Coca Colas brand image or sales. Razdan elucidates that Coca-Cola is an iconic brand and bullet-proof to such small acts.

Industry veteran and Brand-Building Founder Ambi Parameswaran points out: Interesting that he pushed aside a Coke can. Coca Cola is a sponsor of the event and it can take action against the organisers. But given the fact that Coke is the most recognised and loved brand in the world, they may shrug it off as a storm in a small teacup. The company is fully aware that health bloggers are anti any sugary drink. But there is still a large segment of consumers who need their sugar fix.

He also suggests a solution to the brand, Coke has covered its bases with the launch of Coke Zero. So maybe they should have placed Coke Zero on the table near Ronaldo. And hoped that he picks it up and takes a swig; that would be worth a lot.

POKKT AnyTag India Lead Shuchi Sethi adds, As a matter of fact, Coca Cola doesn't advertise themselves as a health drink and if a footballer who is really concerned about what he eats or drinks has a choice of not consuming sugar or soda in any form and it should be respected. We don't know what his story is behind not drinking Coca Cola; it's not like he drank Pepsi instead, right?

"And for Coca Cola, being a brand that is loved by millions and billions, I am sure they would know that some people are averse to drinking soda and it could be celebrities too, it wouldn't taint their image in any way.

For the uninitiated, Ronaldo was once the sponsor of the drink in the early 2000s and an avid fan of the brand. He was, reportedly, alerted by Manchester United legend Ryan Giggs against the harm that soft drinks could cause, pushing the player on a path to adopt a healthier lifestyle for the sake of the game. Heres an old ad of him for the brand.

Read more news about (internet advertising India, internet advertising, advertising India, digital advertising India, media advertising India)

Go here to see the original:
Will Ronaldo's cola snub take the fizz out of Coke's brand image? - Exchange4Media