Media Search:



BLM Blasts Whitehouse I Am Ashamed of Senator and His Affiliation With This Racist Club – GoLocalProv

Tuesday, June 22, 2021

GoLocalProv News Team

View Larger +

U.S. Senator Sheldon Whitehouse and Brother Gary Dantzler

I think the people who are running the place are still working on that and Im sorry it hasn't happened yet, said Whitehouse. The Senator and his family have been members for decades.

Since GoLocal reported the news the Whitehouse's defense of the exclusive club, it has been reported by the NBC News, the Daily Mail, Washington Post, Fox News, and dozens of other news organizations globally.

SEE THE FULL VIDEO INTERVIEW BELOW

The Senator transferred his ownership in the club to his wife Sandra Thornton Whitehouse making her one of the largest shareholders in the exclusive club.

Whitehouses comments sparked outrage and disappointment from Rhode Islands leaders in the Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement.

In Rhode Island, there are two separate BLM groups. Brother Gary Dantzler, Executive Director of Black Lives Matter Rhode Island blasted Whitehouses membership and Baileys Beach Club.

We need to put an end to this good ole boy mentality and hold our elected officials accountable. Black Lives Matter Rhode Island expects the Senator to call this what it is; Jim Crow era racism thats been lingering around the Black community like a plague. Its time for real change and equity, said Dantzler.

The Senator has spoken out about the injustice of systematic racism in America. On June 4, 2020, after the deaths of George Floyd, Ahmaud Arbery, and Breonna Taylor, Whitehouse said in a statement,We hear the voices of the peaceful protestors who have marched. We can and must do better to root out systemic racism in its many forms."

Its time to create opportunities in the Black community by supporting the work thats happening in RI. No more hiding behind empty words, added Dantzler.

Whitehouse in his interview with GoLocal said of the exclusive club,It's a long tradition in Rhode Island and there are many of them and I think we just need to work our way through the issues, thank you. Whitehouse was then ushered away by a staffer.

SEE GOLOCAL'S 2017 INTERVIEW WITH WHITEHOUSE HERE ON HIS MEMBERSHIP IN THE CLUB

View Larger +

Senator Sheldon Whitehouse at Bailey's Beach Club

Harrison Tuttle, the Executive Director of the BLM RI PAC, also had strong words for Whitehouse and called for him to force change at Baileys.

Sen. Whitehouse declining to push to diversify the all-white Baileys Beach Club shows where his priorities lay, said Tuttle.

After a year of protests calling for change, Sen. Whitehouse is in a position to make it happen and has passed the buck. Its past time that Sen. Whitehouse used his platform and make his actions match his rhetoric. Sen. Whitehouse should publicly and vigorously support increased diversity and accessibility and clubs like his, which have long held shut their doors to people of color, added Tuttle.

Read more:
BLM Blasts Whitehouse I Am Ashamed of Senator and His Affiliation With This Racist Club - GoLocalProv

The Soundtrack of the George Floyd Protests – Slate

The summer of 2020 was unforgettable. The murder of George Floyd sparked protests around the country, drawing millions of Americans into the streets for demonstrations. And the sounds that summer from the chants of peaceful protesters to the frequent explosions of violence in response from police are still echoing throughout the nation. Many musicians added their voices, sometimes as protesters themselves, but also by releasing songs about the impact of police violence and racism, like The Bigger Picture from Atlanta rapper Lil Baby.

Theres a long history of music from the African American voice being used in resistance. On Fridays episode of A Word, I spoke with Atlanta-based entertainment and music journalist Jewel Wicker about what Black protest music looks like today. Our conversation has been edited and condensed for clarity.

Jason Johnson: What struck you about The Bigger Picture and how Lil Baby put it together? And is this the kind of thing that he tends to talk about or was this a departure?

Jewel Wicker: This was certainly a departure from what Lil Baby has usually put out content-wise. And I think what really struck me was the timing of the release. It was something that Lil Baby couldnt have known when he put it out, but less than 24 hours after he released that song, a Black man by the name of Rayshard Brooks was killed by police in South Atlanta in the neighborhood that Lil Baby grew up in. And so what was really special I think about this protest anthem that was released was that, 24 hours later, it became an anthem in Lil Babys own city.

What are some of the other songs that came out last summer that you think really spoke to the moment? And again, were those songs with sort of long-term activist, hip-hop stars and rappers, or were they departures as people were paying attention to the moment?

We had songs from everyone from DaBaby, who released a remix of his song, Rockstar that had a Black Lives Matter type of verse to it. H.E.R., a singer, released a song called I Cant Breathe. Anderson .Paak released a song called Lockdown. A rapper by the name of YG filmed a music video at a protest. A group here in Atlanta called Spillage Village released a song called End of Daze. Their music video touched on the protest.

I think it became really common at that time for artists to be speaking on what was going on. I spoke to a Harvard professor, her name is Ingrid Monson. She said what really stood out to her about last years protest music was the timeliness of it, right? If you had protest music in previous decades, they couldnt put it out and have it become the song of a protest the next day. But with streaming, you can put out a song and then the next day, it can become something that people who are in the streets are listening to. Or you can film a music video at a protest and put it out while protests are still going on. This timeliness element is what really stood out about some of the songs that were coming out last year.

What do you think distinguishes Atlanta protest music from maybe songs coming out of Houston or a song coming out of Chicago? Do you think Atlanta has its own flavor to protest music?

One, I would say that Atlanta artists are very linked oftentimes to our politicians here. We see a Killer Mike and a T.I. at a press conference with the mayor. Thats not an uncommon sight here in Atlanta.

But then another thing I would want to point out: I spoke to a reporter by the name of Rodney Carmichael. He does a podcast called Louder Than a Riot, and what he pointed out, which is very true, is that although our artists might not always be speaking about protests specifically, theyre always talking about racial justice in their own ways. If Lil Baby is rapping about growing up in poverty and trapping and things like that, that is inherently political. When you think of Goodie Mobs Soul Food, that was a political album. And so I think we have to stretch our imagination of what we think of when we think of political music. And if we do that, a lot of times the hip-hop music that were listening to is political because being Black, growing up in poverty, growing up in some of these situations are inherently political.

How many of these hip-hop songs and how many of these artists really came out with music last year that was George Floydcentered, that was a change from what or who they had been musically before?

Whats really interesting, and Ive been thinking about this, because when Lil Baby put out The Bigger Picture, I interviewed him last summer for GQ and profiled him, and I spoke to him about releasing that song because it was such a departure for him to put out something that was so blatantly political. What he told me back then, paraphrasing, I dont want to be Martin Luther King or Malcolm X. I put out that song. I spoke to the moment because it touched me and I want to be done with it. I dont want to be involved with politicians.

The DA here, he lost, but he was running for reelection. And he had said that Lil Baby endorsed him. Lil Baby said, I did not. He was very clearly stepping back from being involved in politics. Now, since then, Ive been very interested in the fact that he went on to perform it at the Grammys and he had Tamika Mallory and he had an actor re-create almost the killing of Rayshard Brooks at the Wendys and things like that.

He was just photographed at the White House with Nancy Pelosi. Its a sharp contrast to what he said last July about not wanting to be involved in politics. Im not sure why he made that departure. I have not spoken with him since. I cant say if it was something that he just felt compelled to do. I cant say if it was something that was business-motivated. Lets be honest, a lot of rappers tend to, once they get to a certain levelthey cant always say F the police, or they cant always be explicitly anti-government in the way that they were before; its not lucrative for them to do that. So I cant say if hes doing that just because his heart is leading him to do it, or if its because its just bad for the brand for you not to go ahead and lean into this.

Theres a long history of music telling the story of Black Americans fighting for our rights. So were going to step back in time for a moment. Jewel, youve written about how closely many musicians like the Staple Singers worked with civil rights leaders in the 1960s. How did these relationships come about? Was it because they were already active in the movement and this was just a way that they could participate? Were they moved by what was happening at the time and went into the studio and decided to cut an album?

I was really interested in that and I looked to Bernice Johnson Reagon. I didnt get to interview her, but I did some research about her previous interviews, and she was a founding member of the SNCC Freedom Singers, and shes from Southwest Georgia. And she told PBS that the Staple Singers toured with Martin Luther King Jr.; Mahalia Jackson organized fundraisers for him. They were very much intertwined with the movement beyond the songs that they were recording in the studio. They were actually out activating and organizing a lot of times with these leaders.

I think thats really interesting because weve seen some of that play out recently when we see our artists link up with leaders and politicians today. So I was really interested in that link and in seeing how artists go beyond the music that they released, beyond that moment of going into the studio and feeling compelled to release a song and going beyond that and saying, I want to actually organize, I want to fundraise. I want to do things that are actually going to make me a part of the movement beyond producing the soundtrack.

A lot of artists in the 1960s were all connected to the Black church. They came out of the Black church, they learned from the Black church. Church attendance has gone down in the African American community as it has for almost everybody else. So where are we getting our musicians from now? Where are we getting that sort of activist music?

Well, I would say two things. I would say that even if were not in the church, we usually grew up with a grandma or somebody who was in the church, so the church is still very much a part of us as Black people, even if we didnt grow up specifically in the church. So a lot of times when you listen to some of these songs, you can still hear that element that is a part of these songs.

Then the second thing I would say is weve seen over the year that hip-hop has become the dominant genre and so we really have seen hip-hop artiststhey were very outspoken in previous decades as well, but their music has taken center stage in pop culture. We really have been able to hear them take the front in these moments. And even before last year with protests when we think back to Kendrick Lamar and even, say, Beyonc releasing songs in the Black Lives Matter movement times. They have been able to release songs that were really outspoken about the times that were in and maybe dont have that specific church element, but I think if you listen close enough, you can still hear some of those elements.

We hear about artists endangering their entire lives and careers in the 50s and 60s, but the backlash today is different. So whats the difference in consequences for Black artists making protest music today versus 50 or 60 years ago?

I mean, I think youre right. I think you might not become a Nina Simone in releasing a song, but I also dont want to minimize the impact that some of the controversy might have on an artist when they are attacked by, say, Fox News or by pundits for releasing some of these songs, especially if youre not a Beyonc or a Kendrick Lamar. Releasing a song like F Donald Trump could have a really bigand it didnt for YG. Hes finebut it could have a really big impact on your career. Or recently, weve been talking a lot about Black celebrities and mental health. We dont know what the impact is on their mental health when theyre taking these risks and releasing songs like this. So I dont want to minimize it, but I certainly do think that because of the broad nature of pop culture today and the ways in which artists can have these niche groups of fans, or stans as we call them sometimes, you run less of a risk of being just completely exiled.

Listen to the entire episode below, or subscribe to the show on Apple Podcasts, Overcast, Spotify, Stitcher, Google Play, or wherever you get your podcasts.

Continue reading here:
The Soundtrack of the George Floyd Protests - Slate

Italy will take the knee before Belgium clash ‘as a sign of solidarity’ – but national team ‘do not support… – Goal.com

The Italian Football Federation made a pair of statements clarifying the national team's stance

The Italian Football Federation (FIGC) has confirmed that the national team will take the knee as a sign of solidarity if their next opponents Belgium choose to do so, but says doing so is not in support of the Black Lives Matter campaign.

The statement comes after centre-back Giorgio Chiellini said that the team would kneel if an opponent did so.

Amid confusion on whether players were free to kneel,the federation backed that viewpoint, saying that taking the knee will be done to show solidarity with their opponents.

As Chiellini explained, the team will kneel in solidarity with the opponents, the federation said, according to La Repubblica.

Not for the campaign itself, which we dont share. The Austrian players didnt kneel and ours remained standing. If those from Belgium do so, ours too will in solidarity with them.

TheFIGC went on to add in a second statement:The Italian Football Federation, in reaffirming its unconditional stance against racism and any form of discrimination, considered it opportune to give the team freedom to adhere to the Black Lives Matter campaign.

As President Gabriele Gravina already affirmed not more than a week ago, the FIGC considers the imposition of any behaviour in itself a form of speaking and sustains the squads decision for Euro 2020 games, including against Belgium on Friday.

The sensibility of each member of the Italian national team in defence of human rights is in the Azzurri DNA, as proven by multiple initiatives and declarations, and cannot be subordinated by the adherence to one not the only manifestation of support for the fight against racism.

To date, there has been confusion about Italy's stance as only a handful of players took the knee prior to the team's group stage match against Wales.

Andrea Belotti, Matteo Pessina, Emerson Palmieri, Rafael Toloi and Federico Bernardeschi all knelt alongside the entire Wales team, prompting a discussion on how Italy would handle such situations going forward.

After the incident,former Prime Minister Enrico Letta slammed the players that did not kneel, saying: "I appeal to our players to take the knee all together. Five took the knee and the others didn't frankly, it was not a good spectacle.

"If they can all agree on the tactical plan in the dressing room beforehand, maybe they can do the same about taking the knee. It's a positive gesture. Looking at it on Sunday, with all the Wales players kneeling and only half the Italian players doing it, was not a good image."

His frustrations were echoed by former Italy star Claudio Marchisio.

Theres freedom of choice, but this is a very important protest, and I would have preferred everyone to kneel down, he told RAI Sport.

Visit link:
Italy will take the knee before Belgium clash 'as a sign of solidarity' - but national team 'do not support... - Goal.com

Croatia vs. Spain was Euro 2020’s game of the tournament: How social media reacted – ESPN

Spain's 5-3 win over Croatia in extra time of their Euro 2020 round-of-16 tie had everything: there was a "You won't believe your eyes" own goal, there was a spirited comeback in the final moments of normal time, and there was a heart-warming story of redemption.

In other words, it was the game of the tournament so far.

The drama began in the 20th minute. That's when Pedri played a long backpass that evaded goalkeeper Unai Simon and gently rolled into the Spain net to put Croatia in front.

But Spain would dig themselves out of that hole. Pablo Sarabia equalised 18 minutes later, and Chelsea captain Cesar Azpilicueta headed the 2012 European champions into the lead just shy of the hour mark. Ferran Torres added a third in the 76th minute, and La Roja were out of sight, right?

Not quite.

Five minutes from full-time, Mislav Osic earned Croatia a consolation goal, but surely Spain would see out the game's final few minutes. And then Mario Pasalic scored again in the second minute of stoppage time, levelling the score and setting off euphoria among Croatia's fans.

And so, to extra time we went. And it was there that the game was put to bed, and by none other than Alvaro Morata.

The Juventus striker has started all four of Spain's games at Euro 2020, scoring once in the process. But more notably he's accumulated a number of glaring misses, making him the target of widespread ridicule on social media.

That made his eventual winner all the sweeter.

The rest is here:
Croatia vs. Spain was Euro 2020's game of the tournament: How social media reacted - ESPN

Texas Proposed Plan To Reduce Haze In Its National Parks Falls Short, Critics Say – Houston Public Media

A view from the South Rim trail at Big Bend National Park on a hazy day.

Texas is required to come up with a plan to reduce haze in its national parks, but critics say the proposed plan wont do enough to improve air quality.

The requirement is part of the EPA's Regional Haze Rule, which aims to improve air quality on federal lands. In other states, plans to address haze have often included stricter emissions controls for industrial plants, requiring older plants to implement better pollution control technology.

But for the second time, state environmental regulators at the TCEQ are set to approve a plan Wednesday with no new emissions control measures, citing cost concerns.

More than a decade ago, Texas submitted its initial Regional Haze Plan, which led to a legal back and forth between the EPA and the state over what the plan should include. Now, an updated version is due.

While the latest iteration has the approval of a few industry groups, numerous environmental organizations, alongside officials from the National Park Service and U.S. Forest Service, have filed comments against Texas' plan, saying it doesn't go far enough.

Dan Cohan, a professor of civil and environmental engineering at Rice University, is among those who filed public comments against the proposed plan. Houston Public Media spoke with Cohan to learn more about how the plan impacts Houston and why it's likely to turn into a legal battle with the EPA again.

This interview has been edited for length and clarity.

I know the Regional Haze Plan addresses haze in Big Bend National Park on the other side of the state so how does it impact Houston?

The same pollution that causes haze and obstructs visibility in the national parks is the same pollution thats deadliest for us to breathe in our cities. So anything that we do to reduce haze also makes us healthier, wherever we live.

What are some of the specific air pollutants that it focuses on?

The main cause of haze is something known as PM 2.5, which means fine particulate matter, so tiny particles that can really be made of anything floating in the air. A large amount of this comes as sulfate particles because Texas has more coal power plants that dont have scrubbers than any other state in the country. (Scrubbers are air pollution control devices that help remove particulate matter.)

How does Texas' proposed plan compare to other states?

I was working on Georgias plan 15 years ago, and Georgia and other neighboring states all made plans to require modern emission control technologies at their facilities. Texas managed to avoid doing that the first time around, and now is proposing to continue doing nothing for a decade to come.

What additional emissions controls would you like to see added?

The biggest problem is that we have several coal power plants that still dont have any scrubbers at all to control their sulfur pollution. And that sulfur pollution is a leading cause of the particles in the air that cause the haze and that hurt our health. All new coal power plants since around 1980 have been required to have scrubbers this is 40-year-old technology thats just a given. Whats happened is that the 1970s plants have been grandfathered in without scrubbers at all. The Regional Haze Rule is supposed to go back to those grandfathered, old power plants and bring them up to modern pollution control levels. Thats whats happened in almost every other state in the country, and Texas really stands alone in having resisted those sorts of scrubbers.

Do you think were likely to see more conflict between the TCEQ and the EPA over the latest plan?

This was a big conflict between TCEQ and EPA over the past decade when EPA kept insisting that there be a stronger plan from Texas. Under President Obama, EPA actually stepped in and issued its own federal plan for Texas after rejecting what Texas had done. But before that federal plan took effect, the Trump administration came in and wiped it out. And so weve been left in this limbo, ping-ponging around between what the state and what EPA wants to do. This plan that TCEQ is going to vote on on June 30 sets up the next round of that. This is another attempt by Texas to do nothing and I would not at all be surprised to see EPA reject this again, and perhaps well see another EPA-issued plan for the state.

Fill out the form below to subscribe our new daily editorial newsletter from the HPM Newsroom.

Excerpt from:
Texas Proposed Plan To Reduce Haze In Its National Parks Falls Short, Critics Say - Houston Public Media