Media Search:



‘The Leftward Turn Is Inevitable’: In Lenin’s Hometown, Russian Communists Strive for Soviet Revival – The Moscow Times

ULYANOVSK - When Airat Gibatdinov was born in 1986, Mikhail Gorbachevs Perestroika had already set the Soviet Union on its path to oblivion.

But now, the local lawmaker and deputy head of Russias revived communist party in Ulyanovsk the Volga riverside hometown of the U.S.S.R.s founding father Vladimir Lenin has dedicated his life to resurrecting a Soviet socialism he barely remembers.

We are the only party that fights for the working class, said Gibatdinov in an interview at the Russian Communist Partys Ulyanovsk headquarters, an unassuming warren of offices decked with red flags and Lenin portraits sandwiched between a high-end coffee joint and a hookah bar.

I hope well see a new Russian socialism in my lifetime.

Though widely considered part of the tame, Kremlin-loyal systemic opposition, the Communist Party (KPRF) still the countrys second largest political organization has seen a modest uptick in its support ahead of parliamentary elections in September.

With the pro-Kremlins United Russia blocs polling sinking to historic lows ahead of the vote for the Duma lower house of parliament, the Communists are hoping to turn popular discontent over falling living standards into a strong showing at the polls, including in cities like Ulyanovsk.

Once the leading opposition to Boris Yeltsins free market reforms in the 1990s, the KPRF has long since become part of Russias political establishment.

Though the partys first, and so far only leader, Gennady Zyuganov only narrowly lost to Yeltsin in the 1996 presidential election, over the past two decades he has taken a more loyalist direction, offering rhetorical opposition to the Kremlin while remaining broadly supportive of Russian President Vladimir Putin.

Its a shift that has been accompanied by a steady decline in the partys national standing.

Once the countrys largest single political force with broad nationwide support, the Communists now rely on an aging, Soviet nostalgic voter base of between 10 and 15%, concentrated in a handful of strongholds.

Ulyanovsk, a city of 600,000 that spans a picturesque bend in the Volga river 400 miles east of Moscow, is one of them.

Previously known as Simbirsk, Ulyanovsk has for almost a century borne the name of its most famous son, Vladimir Ilyich Ulyanov better known as Lenin.

Even though this increasingly prosperous provincial center today bears little resemblance to the quiet backwater where Lenin was born in 1870, and left, never to return, at seventeen, the Bolshevik leader remains a ubiquitous presence in Ulyanovsk.

In the city center, a string of sprawling museum complexes commemorate the life and achievements of Lenin, and his steely-eyed visage adorns craft beer bars catering to Ulyanovsks student population.

On the main square, Ulyanovsk State Pedagogical University bears the name of Lenins father Ilya Ulyanov, a provincial school inspector who died when the future revolutionary leader was sixteen.

For Ulyanovsks communists, their citys link with the revered Soviet founder is a source of continued pride.

The one thing everyone knows about Ulyanovsk is that its where Vladimir Iliych Lenin was born, said Gibatdinov, using Lenins patronymic as a sign of respect.

Even though they dont teach the history of Lenin and the revolution properly anymore, something has remained in our mentality. People here have a very strong sense of fairness.

Its a revolutionary heritage that lives on even three decades after the Soviet Union collapsed. At the last parliamentary election in 2016, Ulyanovsk was one of a handful of cities where the KPRF defeated United Russia to win the local Duma district.

But Ulyanovsk is also a microcosm of the wider dilemmas facing Russias modern communists, who must reconcile a revolutionary ideology with their status as a systemic pillar of the political establishment.

The citys State Duma deputy Alexei Kurinny is a relative radical within the KPRF who publicly praised jailed Kremlin critic Alexei Navalnys personal bravery on his return to Russia in January.

By contrast, the regions communist governor, Alexei Russkikh appointed by Putin in April after his unpopular United Russia predecessor was fired is widely seen as Kremlin-loyal, and his nomination a reward for the party leaderships continued cooperation with the authorities.

The communists are a very complex, divided party, said Tatiana Stanovaya, founder of R.Politik, a political consultancy. The senior cadres understand what they have to lose and play by the Kremlins rules.

But many of the younger officials in the regions want a more confrontational approach to the authorities.

Today, there are signs that the Communists comfortable coexistence with the Kremlin may be coming to an end.

Even as polls show the KPRF set to almost double its 2016 vote share amid anxieties around sliding incomes and an eroding social safety net, the authorities have denied a string of high-profile communists registration as candidates.

In July, Pavel Grudinin an agribusiness magnate who came second to Putin in the 2018 presidential election was barred from running for parliament in September.

Though Grudinin was formally banned for having failed to properly disclose overseas investments, many communists, including Grudinin himself, saw it as a politically-motivated move against a popular and independent-minded candidate.

It was a story repeated throughout the lead-up to the polls, with would-be communist candidates including Saratov regional deputy and popular videoblogger Nikolai Bondarenko and influential Moscow party boss Valery Rashkin threatened with exclusions of their own.

For many in the party, the wave of bans is aimed at quashing a defiant atmosphere in parts of the KPRF increasingly unwilling to toe the Kremlins line.

The mood in the party is getting more radical, said Yevgeny Stupin, a Communist Moscow City Duma deputy who has been facing efforts to strip him of his office after he attended protests in support of Navalny in the winter.

United Russias ratings are low enough that they need to disqualify us to have a chance of winning.

Though critics say Russian elections have rarely been free or fair in recent years, systemic opposition parties have at least been able to win from time to time.

But with controversial new electronic and early voting schemes that some fear will make falsification easier than ever, opposition-minded communists increasingly doubt that victory is possible, regardless of public opinion.

Given whats happening at the federal level, with early voting, electronic voting, its becoming more difficult for us, said Gibatdinov, who is running for the Duma in an Ulyanovsk region district.

Of course, they can just rig it.

But above all, candidates of all stripes must contend with deep-seated apathy among the Russian electorate.

A recent survey by Kremlin-linked pollster VTsIOM put interest in politics at a seventeen-year low only six weeks from election day.

At Ulyanovsks various Lenin shrines, there is a steady stream of visitors but little evidence of revolutionary zeal ahead of the polls.

Were very far from politics here, said Olga Shaleva, a tour guide at the citys Lenin House-Museum, the restored mansion in which the young Vladimir Ulyanov spent his early years.

People visit our museum out of interest in history, not political beliefs.

According to some experts, a low turnout in September could play into United Russias hands.

Though the ruling partys polling remains mired below 30% amid corruption scandals and fallout from an unpopular 2018 pension reform, it is still much higher than any other party, with the second place KPRF attracting only 16%.

If turnout is as low as expected, United Russia is likely to retain its two-thirds majority in the State Duma, even with a much reduced vote.

The Kremlin wants the elections to be as boring as possible, said political analyst Stanovaya.

Its in their interests that turnout is low, and that opposition-minded voters stay at home.

But for the citys communist stalwarts, despite voter apathy, fraudulent elections and the Kremlins screw tightening, elections are still worth contesting, even in an ever more undemocratic Russia.

The people have been brainwashed against us for years. said Gibatdinov. It may be difficult, but we can still win.

The leftward turn is inevitable.

View original post here:
'The Leftward Turn Is Inevitable': In Lenin's Hometown, Russian Communists Strive for Soviet Revival - The Moscow Times

SLOBODIAN: Singh lives in the fantasy world of a socialist – Western Standard

During the leaders debates, NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh wasnt forced to explain his support of crushing basic freedoms, superseding parental rights, and protecting the safety of immigrants who commit serious crimes over that of Canadians.

He explained when pressed whod pay for stuff he promises to lavish on Canadians if hes PM.

The billionaires, silly!

One problematic reality in the way of Singhs fantasy is the shortage of taxpaying billionaires to pick up the tab of the breathtaking billions his extreme plans would cost.

Maybe Singh could import billionaires along with the tankers of oil from Saudi Arabia and elsewhere thatll arrive with greater frequency to keep Canada running if he succeeds in his quest to shut down its energy industry.

Clever. Dangle shiny objects of free everything in front of voters universal pharmacare plan, dental and mental health coverage while ending private, for-profit care. Simultaneously, get them too resentful of those selfish rich folk to notice your plan has more holes in it than a sieve.

Theres nothing original in Singhs ploy to seduce voters with promises of cradle-to-grave handouts. He echoes the empty vows hard-core socialists always make before they destroy quality of life and country. History proves they all fail.

Think dictator Fidel Castro who made similar promises. When he died in November 2106, hungry, sickly, bitter, oppressed Cubans rejoiced.

Not Singh. He tweeted: He saw a country wracked by poverty, illiteracy and disease. So he led a revolution that uplifted the lives of millions. RIP #FidelCastro.

Is it plausible Singh, a slick former criminal defense lawyer, didnt know about Castros death squads, imprisonment of homosexuals, or promises of education and healthcare that never materialized?

Prime Minister Justin Trudeau also expressed his deep sorrow over Castros death.

These toxic twins Singh and Trudeau agree on a lot, especially the destruction of Canadas energy industry, and tend to prop up one anothers unpopular policies.

Different parties, same ideals.

Trudeau made unkept promises to deliver Utopia but still ratcheted the national debt to an astounding $1.1-1.3 trillion. Singhs making impossible promises of Utopia on steroids thatll drive it higher. He makes U.S. President Joe Bidens spending policies look like Reaganomics in comparison.

Singh put a price tag on his grandiose election promises after Canadians already started early voting claiming $166 billion in projected revenues of the $214 billion over five years needed for his programs would come from tax hikes for Canadas wealthiest residents and businesses.

There was a time when the super-wealthy paid more of their fair share. Thats what we want to return to, that the burden should not be shouldered by the middle class, by working people. It should be those at the very, very top, said Singh.

Inevitably, the middle class will pay. They always do. Programs always cost buckets much more than what theyre pitched at.

They include: health care $68 billion; reconciliation with indigenous peoples $30 billion; initiatives to fight climate change and support energy workers in the transition $26 billion.

Revenue would also come from plans to implement a 20% foreign home buyers tax and eliminate oil and gas sector subsidies.

Last month, Singh promised to eliminate a whopping $18 billion in fossil fuel subsidies for oil and gas companies and redirect the savings to the renewable energy sector.

The problem with that is the oil and gas industry doesnt get $18 billion in subsidies. It does pay high taxes, and particularly in Albertas case, props up the welfare programs Singh loves with equalization payments.

Singh declared war on the fossil fuels industry. Hed finish the job Trudeau started in destroying Alberta. Shockingly, races are hairline tight in some ridings, including Edmonton Centre and Edmonton Griesbach, between Conservative and NDP candidates.

After how former NDP premier Rachael Notley decimated the province, why are Albertans, other resource-rich provinces, and First Nations who want to get their energy projects going, even toying with voting NDP? Imagine if Singh declared his intent to destroy Ontarios auto industry or Quebecs aviation industry?

Singhs cradle-to-grave socialism that will harm middle-class Canadians and small businesses is hardly all that should worry Canadians.

Singh promotes division by accusing Canada of being a place of racism saying Muslims are not safe in this country without offering proof because there is none.

What else does he support?

Vaccine passports,

A government-enforced stay-at-home order to combat COVID-19,

Pouring more money into the wasteful United Nations and World Health Organization,

Citizenship tests for immigrants covering very basic and simple topics to demonstrate their understanding of Canada,

Canadians struggling to get programs funding for their children in school should pay for free English courses for immigrants,

Immigrants that commit serious crimes in Canada should only be deported back to where they came from if it is safe for them to return,

Even if the federal government doesnt improve its ability to screen out potential terrorists, Muslim immigrants shouldnt be banned from entering Canada,

Government should regulate online hate speech,

Children under 18 should be legally able to receive gender-transition treatments, banning parental authority,

Transgender athletes should be allowed to compete in events even though males have an advantage over females,

Foreigners residing in Canada should have the right to vote,

Decriminalizing drug use.

Meanwhile, Canada could lose an important trading partner and ally with Singh as PM. Singhs support for Sikh separatist groups and his criticism of New Delhis human rights record resulted in him being the first western politician to be denied entry into India.

Singh denounced terrorism. But after winning the leadership in 2017, he stirred controversy by appearing on CBC and refusing to denounce Talwinder Singh Parmer, believed to be the mastermind behind the 1985 Air India bombing.

Oh, and Singh, that personable, seemingly harmless guy appearing on the TV ads, says it shouldnt be illegal to burn the Canadian flag.

Slobodian is the Senior Manitoba Columnist for the Western Standardlslobodian@westernstandardonline.com

Read more:
SLOBODIAN: Singh lives in the fantasy world of a socialist - Western Standard

Xi’s reforms revisit China’s socialist roots while tightening his grip on power – The Japan Times

Beijing When Xi Jinping took command of the Communist Party in late 2012 and proclaimed "only socialism can save China," it was largely ignored as the perfunctory mention of an antiquated slogan not to be taken literally in a modern-day, market-powered economy.

But sweeping new policy moves from crackdowns on internet companies, for-profit education, online gaming and property market excesses to the promulgation of "Common Prosperity" show Xi's seriousness in steering China back toward its socialist roots.

Having done away with term limits in 2018, China's most powerful leader since Mao Zedong is pushing what some observers describe as a mini "revolution," curbing the excesses of capitalism and shedding negative cultural influences of the West.

The effort, touching everything from school curricula including the newly required study of "Xi Jinping Thought on Socialism with Chinese Characteristics" to tighter regulation of the property sector and a squeeze on what the government sees as unwholesome entertainment, has rattled investors and prompted officials and state media to try to assuage markets.

On Wednesday, for example, the official People's Daily sought to reassure the private sector that support for it "had not changed" that recent regulatory actions were meant to "rectify market order," promote fair competition, protect consumer rights and "perfect the socialist market economy system."

But the intent, observers say, is clear.

"Xi wants to address a very contemporary issue the way in which neoliberal reforms have made China much less equal and bring back the sense of mission that shaped early Maoist China," said Rana Mitter, a professor of Chinese history and politics at Oxford University.

That inequality, as well as the vast wealth and power accumulated by some industries, threaten to undermine social stability and ultimately the party's legitimacy if left unchecked, some analysts have said.

The timing of the reforms reflects confidence that China can solve its problems through its own hybrid system instead of following the model of the West, whose shortcomings from managing COVID-19 to the chaos of the U.S. election and withdrawal from Afghanistan are repeatedly depicted in China as evidence of systemic decay.

"The state control model did seem to serve China well in the fight against COVID," said Chen Daoyin, a political commentator who is based in Chile and was formerly an associate professor at Shanghai University of Political Science and Law.

Xi is confident of striking a balance between government and markets, and between power and capital, Chen said.

"The danger is when the state can't resist reaching out its visible hand it creates unpredictability and political risk for capital," Chen said.

Chinese President Xi Jinping and other leaders stand above a giant portrait of late Chinese Chairman Mao Zedong on July 1. | REUTERS

The Hong Kong market, where many Chinese technology firms targeted by the crackdown are listed, has lost over $600 billion in value since July, with investors whipsawed by new regulations and scouring old speeches for clues as to what may be coming.

Xi's activist populism also demonstrates confidence that he can afford to alienate elites who fall on the wrong side of his policies as he solidifies his case for a third five-year term not that there is any visible competition.

But his calculus goes even beyond that, analysts say.

"Xi is an ambitious leader with a grand vision who genuinely wants to go down in history as the man who saved the party and made China strong," said Yang Chaohui, a lecturer in politics at Peking University.

China's State Council Information Office did not immediately reply to a request for comment.

Under Mao, the earliest iterations of party doctrine aspired to free people from the exploitation of capital, destroy private ownership and defeat American imperialism.

Deng Xiaoping, Mao's successor, took a pragmatic turn, allowing market forces to incentivize production and unleashing four decades of breakneck growth that fueled massive wealth accumulation but also deep inequality.

This summer's reforms are enabled by Xi's consolidation of control since taking office: He unleashed a massive anti-corruption campaign, eliminated space for public dissent and reasserted Communist Party power with himself at the "core" across all aspects of society.

With that power, Xi is addressing a spate of societal woes, from people not having enough babies and an unhealthy obsession with educational achievement to young adults so stressed by the rat-race that they would rather drop out and "lie flat." New rules curb young people spending too much time playing online games and too much money promoting their idols.

"Xi has set out to tackle the problems that cause anguish for the common people, such as corrupt officials and the rich-poor gap," said Chen.

While many in China express scepticism that Beijing can get people to have more babies or make big-city housing more affordable, some of the moves appear popular: Many parents welcome an easing of the educational burden and the new three-hour-per-week time limit on children playing online games.

"Championing the common people gives him a moral high ground to consolidate his authority within the party and makes it hard for his political opponents to attack him. After all, who can be against social equality?"

In a time of both misinformation and too much information, quality journalism is more crucial than ever.By subscribing, you can help us get the story right.

PHOTO GALLERY (CLICK TO ENLARGE)

Read the original here:
Xi's reforms revisit China's socialist roots while tightening his grip on power - The Japan Times

Why robotics and artificial intelligence will be bigger than the discovery of the New World | Column – Tampa Bay Times

Having spent more than 25 years working with industry partners to educate and prepare the future workforce, it is not surprising to see that Florida has experienced growth in the technology sector.

Across the nation, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics estimates that computer and information technology occupations are projected to grow 11 percent from 2019 to 2029, much faster than the average for all occupations. Additionally, demand for skilled professionals in robotics and artificial intelligence is growing. The World Economic Forum estimates that while 85 million jobs will be displaced, 97 million new jobs will be created across 26 countries by 2025 due to the growth of artificial intelligence technology.

From my conversations with industry leaders to the research and data Ive studied, all signs lead me to believe that robotics and artificial intelligence will be a significant economic driver, surpassing the impact of Christopher Columbus exploration of the New World in 1492.

While Columbus used sophisticated technology that was highly advanced for his time, he was still required to convince Queen Isabella that his trip and tools had value. His technology included the compass, maps, and charts that helped him navigate what many considered a nearly unthinkable journey.

Today, few in our modern world need to be convinced that computing and other advanced technologies, including robotics and artificial intelligence, have value.

While certainly some people fear technology will impact us negatively with the loss of jobs or human touch, others see technologies like robotic surgery or manufacturing as protections that can help heal people faster or make work more effective. Today, robots are largely sophisticated tools that are as amazing and mindboggling as the compass and quadrant were in Columbus time.

While Columbus trip changed the world, it took hundreds of years for its impact to be understood and capitalized upon. Robotics, as a field of practice and study, rapidly will change the future for graduates, and all of us, with new technologies being employed each year.

The idea of a robot may bring to mind images of Commander Data from Star Trek, or more frighteningly, the robots featured in The Terminator, but the field of robotics is much broader than those perceptions.

According to the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, there are many types of robots from those in aerospace, to consumer products, disaster response, drones, autonomous vehicles, and exoskeletons, to industrial robots, and medical robots, among others. In 2019, an article in Oxford Economics revealed that the number of robots in use worldwide multiplied three-fold over the past two decades, to 2.25 million. In many cases, robots are simply machines that are programmed to perform tasks or take actions. They are able to do things in anticipation of needs, based on artificial intelligence coding.

A final point to consider is the impact on the economy. After Columbus journey, trade between nations became prevalent and a new economic system was born. Likewise, demand for robotics and artificial intelligence technology will grow and create new efficiencies. PriceWaterhouseCoopers Global Artificial Intelligence Study predicts that by 2030, growth of artificial intelligence will lead to an estimated $15.7 trillion, or 26 percent increase, in global gross domestic product.

Demand for robotics engineers and technicians also will grow, given the need for designing and maintaining robots. There also will be strong demand for application developers for robotic systems and solutions. So, while some fear that robots and artificial intelligence will take away jobs from humans, they will create many more jobs and careers.

With what I now know today, if I could go back and change my college major, I would select robotics. There are many opportunities in this growing field. It is multidisciplinary, creative, impactful, and would allow me to innovate. It is and will be the next big discovery in our world.

Jeffrey D. Senese, PhD, is the president of Saint Leo University, a private, nonprofit Catholic university based in Pasco County, FL. Saint Leo is the largest Benedictine Catholic university in the world, educating more than 18,000 students each year. This fall, the university is launching a bachelors degree in robotics and artificial intelligence and opening a new college dedicated to the growing field.

Excerpt from:
Why robotics and artificial intelligence will be bigger than the discovery of the New World | Column - Tampa Bay Times

Current uses, emerging applications, and clinical integration of artificial intelligence in neuroradiology – DocWire News

This article was originally published here

Rev Neurosci. 2021 Sep 10. doi: 10.1515/revneuro-2021-0101. Online ahead of print.

ABSTRACT

Artificial intelligence (AI) is a branch of computer science with a variety of subfields and techniques, exploited to serve as a deductive tool that performs tasks originally requiring human cognition. AI tools and its subdomains are being incorporated into healthcare delivery for the improvement of medical data interpretation encompassing clinical management, diagnostics, and prognostic outcomes. In the field of neuroradiology, AI manifested through deep machine learning and connected neural networks (CNNs) has demonstrated incredible accuracy in identifying pathology and aiding in diagnosis and prognostication in several areas of neurology and neurosurgery. In this literature review, we survey the available clinical data highlighting the utilization of AI in the field of neuroradiology across multiple neurological and neurosurgical subspecialties. In addition, we discuss the emerging role of AI in neuroradiology, its strengths and limitations, as well as future needs in strengthening its role in clinical practice. Our review evaluated data across several subspecialties of neurology and neurosurgery including vascular neurology, spinal pathology, traumatic brain injury (TBI), neuro-oncology, multiple sclerosis, Alzheimers disease, and epilepsy. AI has established a strong presence within the realm of neuroradiology as a successful and largely supportive technology aiding in the interpretation, diagnosis, and even prognostication of various pathologies. More research is warranted to establish its full scientific validity and determine its maximum potential to aid in optimizing and providing the most accurate imaging interpretation.

PMID:34506699 | DOI:10.1515/revneuro-2021-0101

Read the original:
Current uses, emerging applications, and clinical integration of artificial intelligence in neuroradiology - DocWire News