Mediaboss Marketing

With help from Renuka Rayasam

CONGRESSIONAL LOVE LANGUAGES The 1992 best-seller Men Are From Mars, Women Are From Venus looks today like a reductive exercise in gender stereotypes. But set the retrograde cliches aside: The book accurately conveyed a central truth that might help congressional Democrats as they stare down a brutal fall. Relationship breakdowns happen when you and your partner are communicating on your own terms, rather than trying to find common ground despite different frames of reference.

And lately, Democratic centrists and progressives are not only talking past each other, they are also doing so in two separate languages. So while the binary Mars-Venus frame doesnt work for gender, it might just teach the two camps inside President Joe Bidens party how to live under the same roof without the stakes of its big tent flying away in a gust.

Reps. Ilhan Omar (D-Mich.) and Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.) are pictured on Capitol Hill in Washington, D.C. | Joshua Roberts/Getty Images

The first lesson comes from Congressional Progressive Caucus Chair Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.). She told POLITICO on Friday that she has the votes within her 96-member bloc to stop the Senate-passed bipartisan infrastructure bill from clearing the House next week unless a multitrillion-dollar social spending bill also moves ahead. People want to see us fight for them, she added.

This is Mars talk, more or less. Progressives are willing to risk short-term legislative failure if it connects to their deeply held policy principles because theyre motivated by the fight itself.

Centrists, on the other hand, are from Venus. Heres how Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) addressed the social spending bill in a recent ABC News interview: No one is talking about inflation or debt, and we should have that as part of the discussion. I cant understand why we cant take time, deliberate on this, and work.

Centrists like Manchin would prefer long-term legislative stasis to a short-term failure if it gives them more time to socialize their goals. Theyre motivated by the act of outreach, however performative it may look to their colleagues on the left.

Can Democratic leaders please both fight-for-whats-right liberals and talk-it-through centrists? Possibly, but it would require a conversation about the $550 billion infrastructure bill that bridges this Mars-Venus divide.

Sen. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) leaves a hearing on Capitol Hill. | Alex Wong/Getty Images

Each wing would have to accept the others needs for the whole party to get what it wants. And based on Arizona Sen. Kyrsten Sinemas recent ultimatum to Biden about walking away from the social spending talks if the House infrastructure vote fails as soon as next week, the chances of that acceptance arent looking good.

The second lesson comes from Reps. Cori Bush (R-Mo.), Ilhan Omar (D-Minn.) and other progressives who, after the Senate parliamentarian ruled against including immigration reform in the social spending bill, urged their party to push past the rules referee. Top Democrats can and should ignore the parliamentarian, Omar tweeted. The parliamentarian must be overruled, Bush tweeted.

This isnt going to happen, but theyre illustrating a classic element of progressive communication: Always try to move the range of acceptable outcomes.

Think of this as the progressive version of what original Mars/Venus author John Gray described as the cave that Mars denizens retreat to when theyre under pressure. A trip to the cave doesnt necessarily accomplish the goals of Mars natives, but it lets them blow off steam that later helps them communicate better.

To that end, the Democrats left flank is going to naturally want to clamor for bigger and bolder resistance after a defeat like the one they got dealt on immigration. That venting is valuable and is likely to be followed by a come-together moment for the party when the time is right.

Welcome to POLITICO Nightly. Reach out with news, tips and ideas for us at [emailprotected]. Or contact tonights author at [emailprotected] and on Twitter at @eschor.

A message from Altria:

Moving beyond smoking. Altrias companies are leading the way in moving adult smokers away from cigarettes by taking action to transition millions toward less harmful choices. We are investing in a diverse mix of businesses to broaden options beyond traditional, combustible cigarettes. See how were moving.

Dems rope debt to government funding, lassoing GOP into clash: Congressional Democrats are proposing lifting the debt ceiling through the 2022 midterm elections as part of their plans to fund the government into December, leaders said this afternoon. But that measure, which is set for a House vote this week, faces an uncertain future as Senate Republicans remain unwilling to help Democrats neutralize the looming crisis over the nations debt limit when their party controls Congress and the White House.

Bidens broad booster plan driven partly by supply concerns: Top advisers to Biden pushed for his administration to announce a broad booster rollout for September in part because of fears that the U.S. could run short of doses needed to offer the shots to its entire population if vaccines protection decreased suddenly, according to two senior officials with knowledge of the matter. The internal campaign coincided with pleas from international leaders for the U.S. to do more to help lower-and middle-income countries secure initial doses.

Pfizer, BioNTech say Covid-19 shot for kids is safe and provokes strong immune response: The immune response seen in the 5- to 11-year olds enrolled in the late-stage clinical trial was comparable to that seen in teens and young adults, even though the childrens dosage was one-third the amount used in people 12 and over. The companies have not released detailed data from the study, nor have they published the findings in a peer-reviewed journal.

Supreme Court sets Dec. 1 for arguments in challenge to Roe v. Wade: The Supreme Court today scheduled Dec. 1 arguments on Mississippis ban on abortion after 15 weeks of pregnancy. Mississippis ban has been blocked by lower courts because it directly violates Roes protections for pre-viability abortions.

Texas doctor sued after saying he defied states new abortion law: A San Antonio doctor who said he performed an abortion in defiance of a new Texas law has been sued by two people seeking to test the legality of the states near-total ban on the procedure.

White House: Possible use of whips on Haitian migrants is horrific: White House press secretary Jen Psaki expressed dismay today at images that appeared to show Border Patrol agents using whips on migrants seeking asylum along the U.S.-Mexico border. Psaki said that administration officials were aware of the situation and that its horrible to watch.

U.S. to lift air travel restrictions for fully vaccinated foreigners: The Biden administration is targeting early November for foreign travel to resume for the first time in more than a year. The head of the White Houses Covid-19 Response Team, Jeff Zients, announced today that foreign nationals must show proof of vaccination and proof of a negative Covid-19 test taken three days prior to boarding an airplane.

Attorney for Trump CFO hints at more indictments: A lawyer for Trump Organization executive Allen Weisselberg said today that Manhattan District Attorney Cyrus Vance may bring charges against more people as part of the probe into the former presidents company. Weisselbergs attorney, Bryan Skarlatos, did not say which people might face charges or whether he thinks former President Donald Trump could be among them.

PUTINS PARTY WINS BIG IN DISPUTED ELECTION Russias ruling party on Sunday secured a landslide win in a vote that has been dubbed the most repressive since Soviet times.

With some 85 percent of ballots counted as of early today, United Russia which backs Russian President Vladimir Putin had won 50 percent of the vote, appearing to lose some seats in parliament but paving the way for it to retain its majority.

Three days of voting an extended period the authorities claim is meant to prevent a spread of the coronavirus, but critics argue facilitates vote-rigging brought with it a litany of violations.

In Moscow, results from electronic voting had still not been made public after 12 hours, a delay that critics decried as a sign of tampering.

And as in previous elections, footage shared on social media showed brazen ballot stuffing and harassment of observers. At least one new tactic also surfaced the use of pens with disappearing ink, presumably in order to correct ballots after they had been cast.

LIGHTNING CRASHES The European Commission is set to present a legislative proposal on Thursday to force manufacturers to use a common charger for electronic devices, according to a Commission official closely involved in the file.

The proposal will require all manufacturers to harmonize the charging points on devices using a USB-C charging point and to make their software protocol for fast charging interoperable between brands and devices.

The main target of the new legislation is U.S. tech giant Apple, which has pushed back against EU attempts to standardize chargers through binding requirements, arguing that it will hamper innovation.

CALL MY AGENTS Bob Woodward and Robert Costas Peril, which will be published Tuesday, is the last of this summers flood of books about the end of the Trump presidency. Among the others: Michael Wolffs Landslide, Carol Leonnig and Philip Ruckers I Alone Can Fix It, and Michael Benders Frankly, We Did Win This Election: The Inside Story of How Trump Lost.

Washington, D.C., book agent Rafe Sagalyn called the Woodward/Costa book a market test of whether there is still an appetite for Trump era books.

The Trump-related book has been a staple for a few years, but there are signs of fatigue, esp after the 3 bestsellers from last month, Sagalyn wrote in an email to Nightlys Renuka Rayasam.

Sagalyn and two other books agents that Nightly spoke with still werent quite sure what comes next for political book publishing. Agents dont think Biden will juice the publishing industry in the same way. Its hard to envision a Biden book full of the kind of salacious gossip thats made Trump books so popular over the years.

Trump was a singular, horrific figure, Gail Ross, president of the Ross Yoon agency, told Nightly. The aftereffects are just extraordinary.

Ross and Elyse Cheney, the agent who repped Leonnig and Rucker, each separately predicted that the next generation of post-Trump political books will be more issue- and idea-oriented and less focused on the occupant of the Oval Office.

We will use the term political book more elastically, Ross said. People are reading more during the pandemic or at least buying books to fill their Zoom background shelves.

Ross just sold a book from Sherrilyn Ifill about being on the cliff of democracy. Policy books can be as successful as the scandal book, she said.

Cheney said shes been obsessed lately with the idea that civilization is collapsing and that Big Tech executives hold as much power as the president. She would love to see more books about the behind the scenes worlds of Mark Zuckerberg and Sheryl Sandberg, though she admits Silicon Valley tends to be less dishy and transparent than Washington.

The relief of not having Trump in office is being able to think about things on a bigger scale, Cheney said. Or being able to think at all.

Did someone forward this email to you? Sign up here.

A message from Altria:

Moving beyond smoking. Altrias companies are leading the way in moving adult smokers away from cigarettes. Today, we are taking action to transition millions toward less harmful choices.

From cigarettes to innovative alternatives. By investing in a diverse mix of businesses, Altria is working to further broaden options. Our companies are encouraging adult smokers to transition to a range of choices that go beyond traditional, combustible cigarettes.

From tobacco company to tobacco harm reduction company. And while Altria is moving forward to reduce harm, we are not moving alone. We are working closely with FDA and other regulatory bodies, and will work strictly under their framework.

See how were moving.

View post:
Progressives are from Mars, Manchin is from Venus - Politico

President Biden and AOC. Illustrated | AP Images, Getty Images, iStock

There's an obvious way out for Democrats struggling to cobble together the votes for the more liberal reconciliation bill that is part of their two-pronged approach to infrastructure: come together and pass what they can, sending it to President Biden's desk. It will be a win for the president, a sign the party can govern with its narrow majorities, and it will let them run on infrastructure and maybe even bipartisanship in the midterm elections.

The question is whether progressives will go along. They were once in a similar situation with ObamaCare. The public option was a compromise for them, as they preferred something closer to Medicare for All. Then even the public option was stripped out of ObamaCare by moderates and a small number of insurance state Democrats.

Liberals briefly threatened to blow everything up. "Caucus leaders expressed absolute commitment to the idea of a robust public option, and said they expect it to be part of any health-care reform legislation," the office of then Rep. Lynn Woosley, a California Democrat who belonged to the Congressional Progressive Caucus, said at the time. Without a public option, said group co-chair Rep. Raul Grijalva, "we are just showering money upon money upon the same system and the same industry that got us into the mess we're in right now."

But the alternative was no health-care bill at all. No legislative victory for a first-term Democratic president beyond a basically partisan fiscal stimulus package. And, based on what happened after the Bill and Hillary Clinton health-care plan failed to even receive a congressional vote in the 1990s, it was likely Republicans would have been able to use the legislation against them in the midterm elections while Democrats would have had nothing to show for it.

Sound familiar? The $3.5 trillion reconciliation bill is the left's compromise now, and they are again being asked to settle for even less. Back then, progressives relented. Today they are ready to run a party they are a much bigger part of now than in 2010. Their young leaders are sick of the aging, dwindling moderates. And they are still trying to pass something more ambitious than ObamaCare.

Story continues

But the Alexandria Ocasio-Cortezes of the party do believe in government, and therefore governing. Do they view the GOP's Freedom Caucus, which is often more interested in stopping legislation, as a model for how to do so?

Did Theranos Lose Afghanistan?

There's 'no way' to predict Joe Manchin's reconciliation vote, says former adviser

How Gavin Newsom ran away with the recall

Read the original:
Will progressives cave on Biden's reconciliation bill? - Yahoo News

As the COVID-19 Delta variant continues to spread throughout the United States, Democratic lawmakers have introduced a bill to reinstate the expired eviction moratorium. (iStock)

Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and dozens of progressive lawmakers on Tuesday introduced the Keeping Renters Safe Act of 2021, aimed at reinstating the nationwide eviction moratorium.

This pandemic isnt over, and we have to do everything we can to protect renters from the harm and trauma of needless eviction, which upends the lives of those struggling to get back on their feet.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) had previously mandated an eviction freeze in September 2020 to help stop the spread of COVID-19. Still, theSupreme Court ruledthat the agency couldn't continue extending the ban without Congress' approval.

After the initial COVID-19 eviction protections expired in July 2021, the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) issued another eviction moratorium under the direction of President Joe Biden. But the Supreme Court again ruled that the HHS secretary doesn't have the authority to implement a ban on residential evictions.

The Keeping Renters Safe Act would grant the HHS secretary permanent authority to implement a residential eviction ban during public health crises to help prevent the spread of communicable diseases, including at homeless shelters. The act would also direct the HHS to implement an eviction moratorium to remain in effect while the COVID-19 pandemic remains a public health emergency.

While some state and local governments have issued guidance on evictions, there's currently no eviction ban put in place by the federal government.

Whether you're a landlord struggling to keep up with unpaid rent or you're a renter at risk of eviction, you have options for managing your finances during the coronavirus pandemic. Keep reading to learn more, and visit Credible to browse several products that may help you overcome financial hardship.

LANDLORDS CAN CONSIDER THESE ALTERNATIVES TO EVICTIONS AMID NEW MORATORIUM

While eviction bans have been lifted in many states, evicting a tenant can be an expensive process. Here are a few alternative options that landlords have if their tenants aren't paying rent:

If you decide to refinance your mortgage, it's important to shop around for the lowest interest rate possible for your situation. You can get pre-qualified to see your estimated mortgage refinance rate without impacting your credit score on Credible.

There's not currently an eviction moratorium in many parts of the country, which means renters who are struggling financially may be evicted if they don't pay rent. In addition to the rental assistance programs mentioned above, consider a few ways to trim your budget so you can keep making rent payments on time and avoid eviction.

13.4M AMERICANS BEHIND ON HOUSING PAYMENT, SURVEY SAYS

Budgeting apps can help you identify areas in which you may be overspending. These apps link to your bank account to automatically categorize your spending, making the whole budgeting process more seamless than ever before. For example, you may be spending more on restaurants and entertainment than you truly realize.

You can even set up alerts that automatically notify you if you've gone over your budget in certain categories.

There are plenty of free budgeting apps that are available on both mobile and desktop platforms. You can also enroll in free credit monitoring through Credible to keep an eye on your credit score.

Student loan refinancing is when you take out a new loan with better terms such as a lower interest rate to repay your current loan. By refinancing your private student loans, you may be able to save money on interest, lower your monthly payments and even repay your loans faster.

Creditworthy borrowers who refinanced to a longer-term student loan on Credible were able to cut their monthly payments by more than $250 on average, without adding to the overall cost of borrowing.

Now may be a good time to refinance your student loan debt, because interest rates are near historic lows.

You may be able to secure a much lower interest rate on your student loan debt. However, it's important to know that refinancing your federal loans into a private student loan will make you ineligible for certain borrower protections like income-driven repayment plans and administrative forbearance.

Compare student loan refinance offers on Credible to see if you qualify for the most competitive interest rates.

3 TIPS TO HELP EASE THE BURDEN OF STUDENT LOANS ONCE FORBEARANCE ENDS

Revolving credit card debt is an expensive burden on your wallet that can keep you from meeting your other financial obligations, such as paying rent. Keeping track of your credit usage can be difficult as interest compounds daily, and making the minimum payment can result in a lengthy and expensive debt repayment process.

Consider consolidating your credit card debt into a personal loan at a lower interest rate. Sometimes called debt consolidation loans, personal loans allow you to pay off credit card debt in fixed monthly payments over a predetermined period of time.

Paying off credit card debt with a personal loan can help you reduce your monthly payments and save money on interest charges over time. Borrowers who refinance credit card debt on Credible have the potential to save money on their monthly payments and pay less in interest over time.

Use a personal loan calculator to estimate your monthly payment and see if consolidating credit card debt is the right option for you.

AMERICANS RANK DEBT PAYOFF AS HIGHEST FINANCIAL PRIORITY, STUDY SHOWS

Have a finance-related question, but don't know who to ask? Email The Credible Money Expert atmoneyexpert@credible.comand your question might be answeredby Crediblein our Money Expert column.

See the rest here:
Eviction moratorium update: Warren, progressives introduce bill aimed at extending ban - FOX 5 Atlanta

Progressives have wanted to close down Rikers Island for years, viewing the shuttering of the citys jail complexes there as a symbolic blow against mass incarceration. The editorial board of the New York Times, one of the institutions leading the campaign, argued last week that Rikerss worsening problems of decay and violence are more evidence that too many people remain in jail. Unfortunately, the articles analytical errors and unwarranted assumptions culminate in policy recommendations likely to make things worse.

The Times and the conventional wisdom that it represents have already won the argument, in many respects. Over the last few years, the city has delivered a number of the reforms advocates demanded. Since Mayor Bill de Blasio took office in 2014, the jail population has been more than halved. The New York City Department of Correction has dramatically scaled back the use of punitive segregation, also known as solitary confinement. The city has greatly restricted correction officers use of force. Teenage suspects and offenders are now off the island and in less restrictive facilities. And two years ago, de Blasio signed legislation that would shutter the islands jails and replace them with a far smaller, borough-based high-rise jail system in Brooklyn, the Bronx, Manhattan, and Queens.

Yet despite these victories, actual conditions at the jail complexwhich houses nearly 6,000 people, most of them awaiting trialremain horrific. This year, 12 inmates have died in custody, including two men in the last week (though one was not technically on the island). Inmates fester in overcrowded intake areas for days before jail officers assign beds. Medical care and food are scarce. Violence among inmates and between guards and inmates is up.

But in highlighting these inhumane conditions, the Times editorial board misdiagnoses the problem. New York, like the rest of the country, locks up far too many people for no good reason, the editorial asserts. To its credit, the editorial board acknowledges the sharp reduction in the city jail population since de Blasio took office. But it argues that this doesnt go far enough, costing the city millions that it might otherwise save. This last claim reflects a misguided calculation of the per-inmate cost of incarceration, a figure arrived at by dividing the DOC budget by the inmate populationbut much of the departments costs are fixed.

This diagnosis also ignores recent changes in the incarcerated population. Releases of nonviolent or less violent inmates over the past few years have left an incarcerated core that is more violent. Two-thirds of Rikers inmates face violent felony charges. The over-incarceration claim is not only inconsistent with the violent background of many Rikers inmates but also at odds with the de Blasio administrations official explanation for why violence in city jails has gotten so out of hand: that its successful decarceration campaign has left behind a population of harder-to-manage offenders.

Such reforms are likely to continue. Last week, New York governor Kathy Hochul signed into law one of the Timess recommendations, releasing hundreds of convicted felons on parole sent back to jail for technical violations of the terms of their release. The focus on parole violators stems from the charge that parolees had their releases revoked merely for minor violations. But the evidence for this is weak. While data from New York are thin, evidence from other jurisdictions tends to show that many incarcerated parole violators committed multiple infractions prior to revocation, were charged with new crimes that triggered the enforcement of a violation, or chose incarceration over an alternative. An analysis of technical parole violators in Tarrant County, Texas, for example, found that offenders under supervision averaged nearly three technical violations per month over 22 months prior to revocation; that 18 percent of offenders were actually arrested for a new offense while under supervision, but for various reasons were not coded as such in the computerized case management system; and that close to 20 percent of offenders opted to take their time when offered treatment or other alternatives to incarceration when facing revocation.

The editorial board suggests that further decarceration could actually improve public safety outside of jail. To make this claim, the board relies on a single study associating longer stays in pretrial detention with higher recidivism rates later on. What the Times leaves out, however, was that the study found higher recidivism only for low-risk defendants. For high-risk defendants, the study noted, there was no relationship between pretrial incarceration and increased crime, suggesting that high-risk defendants can be detained before trial without compromising, and in fact enhancing, public safety and the fair administration of justice. Releasing these same individuals into New York neighborhoods will carry a significant cost to public safety.

A higher proportion of high-risk inmates is no excuse for jail mismanagement, however. That the share of the jail population at a high risk of violent misbehavior has grown doesnt change the fact that the absolute number of such inmates has fallen. It should be easier to manage seven problem inmates in a group of ten than it is to manage ten problem inmates in a group of 20.

So why are violence indicators moving in the wrong direction at Rikers? The answer probably has more to do with the de Blasio administrations reforms on punitive segregation and use of force, which have functionally handcuffed corrections officers and created a more dangerous environment for inmates and staff alike. The evidence clearly shows that as the citys jails became less restrictive, its inmates became more violent. Between 2014 and 2020, for example, inmate-on-inmate violence jumped nearly 70 percentmuch of the increase happening after the city scaled back solitary confinement. Last week, the president of the Correction Captains Association, Patrick Ferraiuolo, told the New York Post, Were almost at a point where [solitary confinement] is almost non-existent, creating a dangerous environment for not only staff, but inmates who are really just looking to do their time on Rikers Island without any issues. Benny Boscio, head of the Correction Officers Benevolent Association, was more pointed in his comments to the Post, saying, Theyve taken away all our tools and now we have total mayhem.

It doesnt require a giant leap to see how this change in the risks faced by defanged correction officers might be related to the staffing crisisone-third of guards are absent on any given daythat is almost surely intensifying the violence problem. Many, including current DOC commissioner Vincent Schiraldi, have suggested that staffing shortages are driven in part by coordinated sick-outs. (That underscores the potential problems associated with strong public-employee union protections that make it harder to discipline officers who dont come to work.)

Rather than grapple with the possibility that violence has worsened as the costs of misbehavior for inmates have been lowered, the Times lays the blame at the feet of bail-reform opponents. Because the bail reform that New York State enacted two years ago, allowing most nonviolent felony offenders to go free without posting cash, was ever-so-modestly rolled back, the editorial board argues, the Rikers Island population is significantly higher thanks to the incarceration of those locked up simply for being poor. The Times offers zero evidence for this proposition. It also ignores the empirical evidence showing that more lenient pretrial-release practices are associated with increases in both crime and failures to appear in court. The proportion of violent felony arrests constituted by offenders with open cases jumped by more than 27 percent in the first nine months of 2020.

De Blasios attempt to show superficial progress on the Close Rikers project has also likely contributed to inhumane conditions and violence in jail. In late 2019, just after signing the four-borough jails plan into law, the mayor pledged to close two jail facilities: the Brooklyn detention complex and one building, Taylor, on Rikers. These two closures show that we are making good on our promise to close Rikers Island and create a correctional system that is fundamentally smaller, safer and fairer, de Blasio said at the time. Not so. The closure of Taylor last year, in particular, has contributed to overcrowding for new inmates going through the intake process. In fact, the mayor actually reversed this closure this week, promising to reopen Taylor as we speak. This dizzying reversal is yet more evidence that neither the mayor nor the city council have thought through the practicalities of the four-borough jail program, which is already two years behind its original schedule of 2026.

Meantime, inmates are on their own.

Nicole Gelinas and Rafael A. Mangual are senior fellows at the Manhattan Institute and contributing editors of City Journal.

Photo by Gary Hershorn/Getty Images

Link:
Rikers Island Is a Mess. Progressives Are Misdiagnosing the Problem. - City Journal

WASHINGTON House progressives will have a few chances to hold down the defense budget this week, but its going to be an uphill fight.

The House is set to vote this week on two Democratic amendments to cut the fiscal 2022 National Defense Authorization Acts $740 billion top line. One would reduce it by roughly 10 percent, and another would undo a $24 billion a plus-up the House Armed Services Committee passed earlier this month.

Key Republicans have warned that cutting the NDAA would cost their support, which Democrats likely need to pass the bill. When the House Rules Committee met Monday to screen amendments, the panels top Republican, Rep. Tom Cole of Oklahoma, said his party likes the bill as-is.

So long as this bill remains largely in its current form and the funding levels remain where they are, I think you will see overwhelming support from Republicans, Cole said.

On Tuesday, the panel advanced a rule that allows consideration of 476 amendments. Among them:

In 2020, the House and Senate defeated twin measures to reduce the Pentagon budget by 10 percent to address the pandemics economic fallout. Then, Democrats split, with the Senate voting 23-77 and the House voting 93-324.

While Republicans argue President Joe Bidens budget request is inadequate to counter Russia and China, progressives say that addressing the COVID-19 pandemic and other domestic needs should take precedence over larding the Pentagons budget.

We face imminent threats from the COVID pandemic, climate change, growing economic inequality, and systemic racial and ethnic inequities [and] also, domestic terrorism, Lee said. It is time to shift our spending priorities to meet these priorities. I personally support much larger cuts to the Pentagon budget.

On Monday, Democratic leaders House Rules Committee Chairman Jim McGovern and HASC Chairman Rep. Adam Smith said they dont like the Republican increase, but they see themselves as outnumbered.

From my vantage point, I think we spend too much on our military budget, but Im clearly in the minority after listening to everybody here speak today, McGovern said.

At the same hearing, Smith reiterated that he supports Bidens budget but lost his panels vote at markup. There, 14 HASC Democrats voted for the plus-up proposed by HASC ranking member Mike Rogers, R-Ala.

I think Biden budget was right. But you know, I do believe in democracy. We had a vote and I lost, Smith told the panel.

Joe Gould is the Congress reporter for Defense News.

See the article here:
House takes up progressive-led defense spending cuts this week - DefenseNews.com