Media Search:



Tesla’s Spending on R&D and Marketing, Compared to Other Automakers – Visual Capitalist

Visualizing the Fastest Trains in the World

Ever since the invention of the steam locomotive in 1802, trains have been a driving societal force.

Invented in Britain at the height of the Industrial Revolution, steam trains gave the empire an unparalleled advantage in transporting goods and people. Soon it spread around the world as other nations scrambled to build their own railway networks to facilitate growth and commerce.

But just as nations rushed to build more railways, they also tried to build faster trains. Japans Tkaid Shinkansen or bullet train in 1964 was the first high-speed rail system, achieving a speed above 124 mph or 200 km/h.

How do other countries and trains compare?

Lets dive into the fastest trains in the world using data from Travel and Leisure magazine.

Japan started the high-speed train revolution in earnest, and its still at the top of the charts.

Though its fastest regular operating bullet trains (the N700A Shinkansen) can reach a top speed of 186 mph or 300 km/h, the countrys new development in magnetic levitation (maglev) is breaking speed records.

In fact, the top two fastest trains in the world are maglev, using two sets of magnets to elevate the train and propel it forward without friction to slow it down.

*No official name or designation has been given yet, so currently listed under the manufacturers name, CRRC Qingdao Sifang.

Japans L0 Series Maglev is still in production, but with a land speed record of 374 mph or 602 km/h it is the fastest train in the world.

Japan is facing stiff competition from China, which already has the worlds longest high speed railway network and is investing heavily in infrastructure.

China already has a maglev train in operation, the Shanghai Maglev, which connects the city center with the international airport. The countrys latest unveiled train in July 2021 achieved a land speed of 373 mph or 600 km/h.

When it was unveiled, the new maglev train was announced as the fastest operating train in the world as it enters full production. But until full operation actually begins, its test speed record is still under that of the L0 Series.

In fact, China has half of the eight fastest trains in the world. Including Japan and South Korea, Asia accounts for the bulk of high-speed rail networks and record speeds.

Though its not all maglevs and Asia dominance. Conventional electric trains in Europe also made the list, with Frances TGV POS and Italys Frecciarossa 1000 reaching speeds of 357 mph (575 km/h) and 245 mph (394 km/h) respectively.

Go here to see the original:
Tesla's Spending on R&D and Marketing, Compared to Other Automakers - Visual Capitalist

An intoxicating mix: getting to grips with Scotland’s addiction to alcohol – Holyrood

When July brought the devastating, though not entirely unexpected, news that in 2020 Scotland racked up a record number of drugs deaths there was no shortage of government ministers with platitudes to offer.

Drugs policy minister Angela Constance called the 1,339 fatalities our national shame while First Minister Nicola Sturgeon said the numbers were shameful and unacceptable, and that every life lost was a human tragedy. Vigils were attended and an extra 250m of funding for services was swiftly found.

Yet when August brought the news that there had been 1,190 alcohol-related deaths in the same period - a figure that was up 17 per cent on the previous year against a five per cent rise in drug-related deaths - the response was decidedly more muted.

Public health minister Maree Todd painted the spike as an anomaly, something that could be put down to the lockdown effect. If extra funding for services is planned, it is yet to be announced.

For Justina Murray, chief executive of the charity Scottish Families Affected by Alcohol and Drugs, the lack of an outcry so soon after hands were wrung over the drug-death numbers was disappointing but not particularly surprising given the way that alcohol consumption - even excessive consumption - has been normalised within Scottish culture.

The political fallout of the alcohol death figures was non-existent its all to do with the pandemic, lets move on, she says.

In general, people just dont like to look too closely at the alcohol issue because its so much part of our society. Even looking at the pandemic, the coverage of alcohol was quite light-hearted it was the only way to cope with homeschooling, there were celebrations when beer gardens reopened but the deaths show theres a dark side to this too. For Scotland thats the real issue.

Source: National Records of Scotland

Scotland has long had a complex relationship with alcohol, on the one hand playing up to its hard-drinking, fun-loving image while on the other demonising anyone who develops a problem with drink.

Alison Douglas, chief executive of Alcohol Focus Scotland, says this is partly to do with the way alcohol has historically been seen as socially acceptable and highly normalised in our society, which in turn is to do with the way that has been driven by commercial interests.

Alcohol is heavily promoted and we see it as an integral part of our social lives and interactions - we use it to relax, socialise and console ourselves and there isnt an occasion where alcohol isnt seen as a desirable part, she says.

We collude in that because its almost part of being a fun person, a social person, and anybody who stands apart from that and says they dont want to drink very often has pressure put on them.

Marketing is also used by drinks companies to abdicate any responsibility for the problems their products help create. Yet Douglas believes that urging people to drink responsibly - a campaign orchestrated entirely by the drinks industry itself - only serves to reinforce the stigma that surrounds alcohol dependency.

Responsible drinking invites us to judge other peoples drinking, she says. Its those people over there, they let the side down, if it wasnt for them we wouldnt have a problem in Scotland.

But if marketing is part of the problem Scotland faces with alcohol, it must be part of the solution, too.

Back in 2010 members of the World Health Organization agreed a global strategy for reducing the harmful use of alcohol. While that was made up of 10 target areas for policy options and interventions, the list has since been reduced to just three: increasing taxes on alcoholic beverages, enacting and enforcing bans or comprehensive restrictions on exposure to alcohol advertising across multiple types of media, and enacting and enforcing restrictions on the physical availability of retailed alcohol.

Public health minister Maree Todd said the increase in alcohol-death figures could largely be explained by lockdown

Scotland has been at the forefront of using taxes as a means of reducing consumption, fighting a long legal battle against the drinks industry to eventually introduce a minimum unit price (MUP) of 50p in May 2018. Early indications are that it has been a legislative success, with a study published in The Lancet earlier this year finding that alcohol sales fell by close to eight per cent after the policy was introduced and a series of reports from Public Health Scotland indicating that that has led to a reduction in harms.

For Elinor Jayne, director of Scottish Health Action on Alcohol Problems (SHAAP), the policy does not go far enough, though. Noting that 50p per unit was the price mooted when the policy was first floated almost a decade ago, Jayne says if the government was serious about reducing alcohol-related harms it would increase that price point with immediate effect.

A first step would be to increase MUP from 50p to 65p because thats just been left to trundle along, she says.

Douglas, too, says she is strongly in favour of seeing MUP rise, in part to take account of inflation - 50p in 2012 equates to 61p today - but also to increase the benefit its delivering. Yet she stresses that without similar action to address both the availability of alcohol and the way it is marketed, the impact of MUP will remain limited.

We need to control availability because at the moment we are reliant on a pretty permissive licensing system, she says.

Local licensing boards can reject applications but they cant actively reduce the number of licences or the amount of alcohol thats sold in a local area. We need to have a look at how we control the amount of alcohol available in particular areas. You are four times more likely to die an alcohol-related death and four times more likely to be hospitalised if you live in a poorer area, but there are more licences available in those areas.

If you have a physical and psychological dependency to alcohol then youre going to do what it takes to maintain that dependency you have to

At the same time, the marketing of alcohol remains an ever-present feature of our daily lives. A study carried out at the University of Stirling on behalf of SHAAP, the Institute of Alcohol Studies and Alcohol Action Ireland found that during games featuring Scotland, England, Ireland and Wales at the 2020 Six Nations Rugby Championships - an event sponsored by drinks giant Guinness - adverts for alcohol appeared once every 12 to 15 seconds.

This is problematic, says Nathan Critchlow, a research fellow in the University of Stirlings Institute for Social Marketing, because there is now four decades worth of research that shows a causal link between children being exposed to alcohol marketing and going on to drink more in adulthood (research from Alcohol Focus Scotland also found children can more readily recognise beer brands than biscuits).

Work is starting to be done on whether there is a similar effect on vulnerable groups such as those in recovery from dependency, but Critchlow notes that a consultation promised in 2018 on whether controls on marketing should be introduced has yet to be launched. Former SNP MSP Linda Fabiani asked the government in February when it intended to start that consultation; according to the Scottish Parliament website the current status of that question is awaiting answer.

Even if these three policy strands went far enough to, when combined, make a meaningful impact on peoples lives, that impact would only be felt by those who have not yet developed a dependency on alcohol.

Jardine Simpson, chief executive of the Scottish Recovery Consortium, notes that MUP, for example, had proved to be good at preventing people reaching the point of addiction, but for those already addicted, no amount of marketing blackouts or pricing spikes will be enough to reverse that.

If you have a physical and psychological dependency to alcohol then youre going to do what it takes to maintain that dependency you have to, he says.

In that respect, taken in isolation MUP - Scotlands most-advanced dependency-prevention measure - can be seen as a regressive policy. The death figures show that in areas classed the poorest by the Scottish Index of Multiple Deprivation, 41 people in 100,000 died an alcohol-related death in 2020 against 10 per 100,000 in those classed the richest.

Source: National Records of Scotland

That chimes with the findings of reports such as Public Health Scotlands slcohol related hospital statistics - which found that in 2019 people in the most deprived areas were seven times more likely to be admitted for an alcohol-related condition than those in the least - and the governments Scottish Health Survey - which found that, while dangerous drinking is more prevalent in wealthier areas, hazardous drinkers in the poorest areas consume the highest number of units per week.

That means that, without well-funded, accessible services designed specifically to reach people already in addiction, Scotlands current alcohol policy-making runs the risk of benefiting the wealthy at the expense of the poor. Yet statutory treatment services, which Audit Scotland deemed to be patchy in 2009, remained inadequate in the years leading up to the Covid-19 pandemic.

In an update to its drug and alcohol services report published in 2019, Audit Scotland found that funding for treatment services varied widely across local authority areas and that outcomes for many people misusing drugs and alcohol have not improved over the last 10 years. Murray says that in the past 18 months they have got a whole lot worse.

We know alcohol and drug use has gone up [as a result of the pandemic] and treatment services have shut their doors, she says.

People are paid to answer the phone but there are services that are just not responding. Why are phones not being answered? Why are answer-phone messages not being returned? Why do most treatment services not have a freephone number?

We found during the pandemic that the trend away from voice-based calls was very rapid. At the moment only a fifth of our contact is over the phone, four-fifths is via webchat or text message. People can do that really discreetly. They can sit on a website and reach out for support for free and in secret. Statutory treatment services dont offer those types of options. It used to be the front door and the phone but now the front door is closed and the phone may or may not be answered. Its pretty ropey.

Though there is obvious frustration that those services are not readily available to everyone who requires them, Jayne says even in areas where provision is strong people miss out because of the way alcohol dependency continues to be viewed by society.

Stigma is real, she says. A lot of people will judge someone with an alcohol problem and think they have somehow brought it on themselves, which isnt the case. This needs to be seen as a health problem.

"We are told by the drinks industry to drink responsibly, but that just puts the onus on the individual to own their own consumption. If we still stigmatise people who have a problem with alcohol then of course they are going to have a problem asking for the help they need.

This, for Simpson, is the crux. Pulling all the strands of prevention and cure together in a transformational policy bundle is one thing, but bringing about the attitudinal change needed for those policies to stick is where the Scottish Governments real challenge will lie.

The issue here is that Scotlands - and most developed countries - attitude towards alcohol is that its primarily a beneficial social lubricant, but alcohol is a toxic substance to the human body and its perceived beneficial effects are subject to that, he says. Its a cultural issue that we need to address - the narrative and therefore the messaging has to change.

If you want to change the Scottish attitude towards alcohol you have to change the narrative around what it is and what harms people experience if they develop a dependency to it. We need to educate but also empower people to understand alcohol in a different way.

Owning the alcohol-death figures in the same way it did the drug-death statistics would have been a good place for the Scottish Government to start that process.

See more here:
An intoxicating mix: getting to grips with Scotland's addiction to alcohol - Holyrood

Adrian Pang: Coping with depression’The black dog sank its fangs into me’ – The Independent

Singapore Homegrown actor Adrian Pang sank into a pit of darkness and despair when the pandemic struck last year and affected the theatre industry.

Having struggled with self-esteem issues throughout his career such as being rejected by overseas casting directors for not being good-looking enough, or caused by taking on a menagerie of caricatures under Mediacorp has made Pang fall into depression.

The black dog sank its fangs into me. I was not just non-essential but non-existent, said Pang, using the metaphor for depression.

On Sunday (Oct 10), the artistic director of local theatre company Pangdemonium told an audience at an online mental health awareness programme: It was hell. Thats what happens when you define yourself by your job and lose all sense of yourself without it.

- Advertisement 1-

Through the crisis, his family supported him, but it was only after seeking professional help that he now has the black dog largely on a leash.

Sometimes, love is not enough, he said, quoting a line from playwright Florian Zellers play The Son, which Pangdemonium staged last year.

If you have a broken leg, if you have kidney failure, all the love in the world is not going to cure it. Just like any other illness, mental illness requires professional help. There is no quick fix.

In commemoration of World Mental Health Day on Sunday, a virtual event called The Unheard: Human Library was organised by a non-profit organisation Project Green Ribbon.

The aim of World Mental Health Day is to raise awareness of mental health issues, which many in Singapore and overseas have had to deal with amid the pandemic as safe management restrictions curb social activities and disrupt economic livelihoods.

According to the organiser, one in seven people in Singapore willencounter mental health issues, of whom only about half will seek the appropriate mental health support.

During The Unheard: Human Library, other speakers such as those who have not been clinically diagnosed shared how they had felt overwhelmed in various stages of their lives and found ways to cope, reported the Straits Times.

Founder of social marketing agency Goodstuph, Pat Law revealed how she worked 400 days without a day off and broke down eventually. Law then booked a weeks staycation for herself in Sentosa and went another week without checking her work e-mails.

You have to let go, release the pedal and go back to gear one, she said. I learnt that I have a limit.

Some shared about dealing with the trauma inflicted by demanding and emotionally abusive parents as well as the dangers of tying ones self-worth to achievements like high school grades.

The guest of honour, Minister of State for Social and Family Development and Education Sun Xueling opened up about how she felt isolated and awkward during her schooling years.

Photo: Facebook screengrab/Project Green Ribbon

I remember feeling tired every day. I did not have any appetite, lost interest in everything and just wanted to sleep, Sun said.

I only came out of this dreadful period of my life when I entered university. In hindsight, I should have had more open conversations about my struggles with teachers and friends.

In a Facebook post, President Halimah Yacobsaid conversations surrounding mental health must lead to concrete steps that improve the situation.

Youth, in particular, need extra support. At such a young age, it may be difficult for some of them to articulate what they are going through, she said.

To develop a pilot curriculum to better help social service agencies support youth, the Presidents Challenge will partner with the Institute of Mental Health (IMH). Together with other agencies, IMH will offerworkshops, webinars and activities till the end of October to reach out to more people and break the stigma surrounding a previously taboo topic.

A total of 18 MPs have committed to a campaign, #452TooMany, to create awareness on mental health through guided discussions with grassroots leaders, community leaders and residents.

#452TooMany refers to the 452 cases of suicides recorded in Singapore last year by the Samaritans of Singapore, a 13 per cent increase since 2019 and the highest since 2012.

Until end-October, Project Green Ribbon is also raising funds for its initiative, The Unheard, which will get more people to share their unique life struggles.

Donationscan be made at the Project Green Ribbon website. /TISG

Follow us on Social Media

Send in your scoops to news@theindependent.sg

Here is the original post:
Adrian Pang: Coping with depression'The black dog sank its fangs into me' - The Independent

GOP officials are urging Republican voters to back Democrats in 2022 – Business Insider

Two GOP officials have urged Republicans in some cases to vote Democratic in the 2022 midterm elections as one of several ways to bolster the party from candidates they described as "pro-Trump extremists."

Miles Taylor, a Trump-era Department of Homeland Security chief of staff, and Christine Todd Whitman, a former Republican governor of New Jersey, wrote a New York Times op-ed article that ran Monday. Taylor is best known for anonymously writing a 2018 op-ed article in The Times describing a "resistance" of Trump administration officials working to tamper what he called the former president's "worst inclinations."

Together, Taylor and Whitman asked that the GOP's base consider supporting Democrats so "conservative pragmatists" could retake control of the party.

"Rational Republicans are losing the party civil war," they wrote. "And the only near-term way to battle pro-Trump extremists is for all of us to team up on key races and overarching political goals with our longtime political opponents: the Democrats."

They added: "It's a strategy that has worked. Mr. Trump lost re-election in large part because Republicans nationwide defected, with seven percent who voted for him in 2016 flipping to support Joe Biden, a margin big enough to have made some difference in key swing states."

The two argued that this move was necessary because the Republican leadership had "turned belief in conspiracy theories and lies about stolen elections into a litmus test for membership and running for office." Taylor and Whitman also renewed a threat for them and more than 100 other former GOP officials to try to start a new center-right party if Trump-backed candidates continued to win Republican primaries.

"The best hope for the rational remnants of the Republican Party is for us to form an alliance with Democrats to defend American institutions, defeat far-right candidates, and elect honorable representatives next year including a strong contingent of moderate Democrats," Taylor and Whitman wrote.

Their strategy would involve GOP voters supporting Democrats like Rep. Abigail Spanberger of Virginia, Rep. Elissa Slotkin of Michigan, and Sen. Mark Kelly of Arizona in what they called "difficult races" likely to feature Trump-supported Republicans. They also advocated defending what they called a "small nucleus of courageous Republicans" such as Reps. Liz Cheney, Adam Kinzinger, and Peter Meijer.

Kinzinger, for one, said in September that he thought the GOP shouldn't win a majority in the House if it were "pushing division and pushing lies." Cheney also said in September that she was not ready to cede the GOP to the "voices of extremism," adding that many Republicans in the House and the Senate had cheered her on privately in her fight against Trump.

The Republican National Committee did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Follow this link:
GOP officials are urging Republican voters to back Democrats in 2022 - Business Insider

Republicans are today’s Dixiecrats | TheHill – The Hill

Of the many crises that face the country, perhaps the most important is the coordinated Republican attack on voting rights. Since the beginning of the year, new laws have been enacted in 19 states that could disenfranchise minority voters by making it harder to vote. Once-rock-solid red states won by President BidenJoe BidenGruden out as Raiders coach after further emails reveal homophobic, sexist comments Abbott bans vaccine mandates from any 'entity in Texas' Jill Biden to campaign with McAuliffe on Friday MORE are leading the way.

In Arizona, a new statute threatens election officials with felony prosecution if ballots are mailed to voters who did not request them, while in Georgia it is a misdemeanor to distribute food and water to those waiting in line. The Georgia law also prohibits unsolicited mailing of absentee ballot applications and requires voters to submit identification to have their requests approved. Both states give the legislature the power to certify results, removing the secretary of state from carrying out this traditional formality.

In Arizona, Democrat Katie Hobbs certified Joe Bidens victory in the 2020 presidential election, while in Georgia Republican Brad Raffensperger formalized Bidens win despite Donald TrumpDonald TrumpPennsylvania Attorney General Josh Shapiro enters governor's race GOP lawmakers introduce measure in support of Columbus Day Bannon's subpoena snub sets up big decision for Biden DOJ MOREs plea to find 11,780 votes, one more than Bidens winning margin.

In 15 other states, 35 bills have passed at least one chamber, making it easier for Republicans to interfere. For example, in Pennsylvania, Florida and Texas, Republicans want audits of the 2020 ballots. Pennsylvania Senate Republicans are demanding 2020 voters driver license information, partial Social Security numbers, changes in voter registration and information about whether ballots were cast by mail or in person. Gov. Tom WolfTom WolfPennsylvania Attorney General Josh Shapiro enters governor's race Four Democratic governors agree to share gun crime data in effort to thwart violence Overnight Health Care Presented by EMAA Biden unravels Trump rule banning clinics from abortion referrals MORE, a Democrat, calls the ploy a sham.

The Freedom to Vote Act guarantees a national right to vote in federal elections. It expands voter registration; sets a minimum number of days and hours for early voting; reduces in-person wait times to no more than 30 minutes; permits postage-free absentee ballots that do not require either witnesses or notarization and will be counted seven days after the election if postmarked by Election Day.

Voters whose signatures are rejected must be notified and allowed to correct the issue. Poll-watchers are restricted in their proximity to those casting ballots, and polling places will be required on college campuses. The bill would curtail partisan gerrymandering and ban any prohibitions on the distribution of food and water to those waiting to vote.

Sen. Joe ManchinJoe ManchinUsing shared principles to guide our global and national energy policy Sinema's office denies report that she wants to cut 0B in climate spending Juan Williams: Women wield the power MORE (D-W.Va.), a key player in the voting rights drama, had this legislation written to his specifications, and all 50 Senate Democrats have voiced their support. Manchin has embarked on a quixotic quest to find 10 Republicans to back it.

But finding enough Republicans to overcome a Senate filibuster is an exercise in futility. Susan CollinsSusan Margaret CollinsBiden signs bill to help victims of 'Havana syndrome' The Hill's Morning Report - Presented by Facebook - After high drama, Senate lifts debt limit Here are the 11 GOP senators who helped advance the debt extension MORE (R-Maine), a frequent Manchin partner in bipartisanship, has voiced her opposition, saying the law has fundamental problems of federalizing state elections. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnellAddison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellDemocrats are ignoring the only thing that matters The Hill's 12:30 Report - Presented by The National Columbus Education Foundation - Positive developments on COVID-19 treatments The Hill's Morning Report - Presented by Altria - Political crosscurrents persist for Biden, Dems MORE (R-Ky.) has pronounced the bill all-but-dead: We will not be supporting it. Sen. Lindsey GrahamLindsey Olin GrahamMost Senate Republicans don't want to see Trump run again Trump heads to Iowa as 2024 chatter grows GOP tries to take filibuster pressure off Manchin, Sinema MOREs (R-S.C.) opposition is even more succinct: Nope.

Once more, obdurate GOP opposition will kill meaningful legislation backed by Manchin, who nevertheless stubbornly clings to his beloved filibuster.

Todays Trump-led Republicans have abandoned the partys historic roots. After the Civil War, Republicans supported federal guarantees to ensure the right of African Americans to cast their ballots. When federal troops left the defeated Confederacy in 1877, Democrats purged Blacks from the voting rolls and voted them out of Congress.

In 1888, Republicans accused President Grover Cleveland and his Democratic congressional majorities of owing their existence to the suppression of the ballot by a criminal nullification of the Constitution and laws of the United States. Benjamin Harrison, who beat Cleveland that year, asked in his inaugural address: How shall those who practice election frauds recover that respect for the sanctity of the ballot which is the first condition and obligation of good citizenship? The man who has come to regard the ballot box as a jugglers hat has renounced his allegiance.

Harrison told Congress that denial of the franchise does not expend itself upon those whose votes are suppressed. Every constituency in the Union is wronged. He later accused those opposed to federal election involvement of racism, saying those animosities ought not to be confessed without shame and cannot be given any weight in the discussion without dishonor.

Donald Trumps 2020 loss magnified many Republicans fear of a future in which whites will soon be a racial minority. A recent poll found 84 percent of Trump voters worry that discrimination against whites will increase significantly in the next few years. Trumps obsession with his 2020 defeat, and his refusal to accept it, has given way to a Republican crusade to reform election laws that may result in disenfranchising enough minority voters to ensure Republican victories.

In a July speech, President Biden called these changes a 21st century Jim Crow assault. In the same address, Biden posed the same question to Republicans that famously dethroned anti-communist crusader Sen. Joseph McCarthy (R-Wis.) back in the 1950s: Have you no shame?

The answer is clear: no. Republicans have shamelessly concluded that winning doesnt necessarily mean garnering the most votes. Instead, its about rigging the system. They are todays new Dixiecrats. Historys discredited Dixiecrats would be proud.

John Kenneth White is a professor of politics at the Catholic University of America. His latest book is What Happened to the Republican Party?

Follow this link:
Republicans are today's Dixiecrats | TheHill - The Hill