Media Search:



Jon Stewart warns more risks to the political system than Trump – POLITICO

If we have identified the pressure points where the guardrails look most vulnerable, that's where we should be focusing so much of our efforts in terms of strengthening. The encouraging thing is watching on a grassroots level, people that are really viewing it as something that they want to protect and that they want to strengthen, Stewart said.

Discussing political developments in the six years between leaving "The Daily Show" and starting a new show, The Problem with Jon Stewart, on Apple TV+ this fall, Stewart said social media algorithms have been a key factor in driving increased political polarization.

We're adjusting to a new information and political ecosystem. The delivery system is more sophisticated, more robust and more ubiquitous," he said. "It helps radicalize in a faster way or a deeper way. We have algorithms that make sure that if you are starting to lean toward something bad then the algorithm says, I've got a four-hour manifesto you've got to see. We have created a machine that makes that kind of radicalization more efficient.

Stewart briefly cast judgment on whether President Joe Biden is doing a good job leading the nation I dont think anybody is before returning to the threat that critics perceive Trump poses to the democratic order, maintaining the former Republican president is mostly an effective vessel.

Again, he is not singing new songs. He is maybe singing them better than [the late Sen. Barry] Goldwater," Stewart said. "But I think it's a mistake to focus it all on this one individual and not to focus it more on the idea that power is its own reward, whether it be in the financial industry or in government. Power doesnt ever cede itself.

We learned a lot of this in recent decades, but especially maybe the last four or five years because Donald Trump was so disruptive and so willing to challenge norms, we have learned that a lot of the American system is built on the honor system," Stewart said. "That only works, of course, if you care about or even have a sense of honor.

Go here to see the original:
Jon Stewart warns more risks to the political system than Trump - POLITICO

For the Love of Guns, God, and Donald Trump – Progressive.org

The Rod of Iron Festival is a two-day event in rural northern Pennsylvania that celebrates God, guns, and a certain former President.

Organized by the Moon family, who have created a rightwing religious cult that worships AR-15s and preaches a gun-focused faith, the festival functions as a showcase for the far rights up-and-comers, and its biggest names.

Reverend Hyung Jin Sean Moon, the chosen heir of Unification Churchs founder (you may know them as The Moonies), acts as the head of the Pennsylvania Sanctuary Church. His brother, Jason Moon, is the owner of the successful Kahr Firearms Group, a maker of semi-automatic handguns and a main sponsor of the Rod of Iron Festival.

In previous years, the festival drew thousands of attendees. This year, attendees numbered in the low hundreds. Most were Korean Americans who either flew in or were members of the Reverend Moons congregation outside of Scranton, Pennsylvania. The rest were mostly white Pennsylvanians who showed up for a love of God, guns, and Donald Trump.

The speakers included local political figures, such as Pennsylvania Congressional candidate Teddy Daniels and former Pennsylvania state Reprepresentative Rick Saccone, along with a smattering of national conservative figures like Dana Loesch of the NRAs online video channel NRATV and former Trump adviser Steve Bannon (via skype).

While Trump is no longer in the White House, his presence filled the hearts and minds of most Rod of Iron attendees. The MAGA cult was in full force here, with nearly every spreaker praising the former leader and questioning the outcome of the otherwise-resolved 2020 election.

Reverend Sean Moon (left) wears a crown of bullets and a golden AR-15 across his chest as he waits backstage to open his festival. His older brother and KAHR Arms founder, Jason, seems to find the adoration that Sean receives amusing.

Owning the libs is a core principle of any successful MAGA event. The idea that liberals need safe spaces is the regular punchline among the proudly toxic masculine men of MAGA. So here at the Rod of Iron Festival, they built what I originally thought was a childrens play area but was, in fact, a mock safe space.

Teddy Daniels, a Congressional candidate for Pennsylvanias Eighth District and a proudly toxic man.

Sheriff Richard Mack, a founder of the Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association, believes that elected sheriffs who swear their oath to the U.S. Constitution are among the highest authorities in the land and do not need to listen to the other elected leaders or the U.S. Supreme Court. Hes seen here posing in front of a Three Percenter flag. (He has in the past aligned himself with the OathKeepers, a group that is made up of many Threepers.)

Guns were, of course, ubiquitous. But so were gun-shaped souvenirs, including the chocolates sold at a coffee and desserts tent. Cindys Gun Sweets were created by a granddaughter of the Reverend Sun Myung Moon. The box they come in tells the story of how Cindys grandfather brought chocolates for his grandchildren at Christmas after being freed from a North Korean concentration camp by U.S. troops in 1950, during the Korean War.

Flags at MAGA events are a big thing. But even at the Trump rallies Ive been to, Ive never seen flags as extensive as on this Americas Flag Truck, a pick-up decked out with dozens of different varieties of the Confederate flag.

Some attendees make their own custom flags, such as this fan of Alex Jones and his show InfoWars who also discussed his belief in QAnon. In my short conversation with him, as he held a flag referencing the meme that Epstein didnt hang himself, he riffed on nearly every conspiracy theory I know, from Trump winning 2020 to a deep state cover-up of Bidens mental capabilities.

Every year at the Rod of Iron Festival, theres an art contest. Most of the art is focused on Reverend Moon and his brother, like this paper clay figurine with an AR-15 accessory. Other pieces included digital art of Jesus with an AR-15 and photos of the Moons on motorcycles.

Former NRATV host Dana Loesch was the keynote speaker on Saturday, October 9. Her speech focused on how her friends told her not to attend the Rod of Iron Festival. She denounced the website The Daily Beast for an article that outlined Rod of Irons far-right funders and connections.

The night ended with an extensive fireworks show that reverberated over the entire region, with the remaining audience numbering around 100 as the show started to run late. The extremely pro-American band that closed out the night went on for a long time, playing one encore after another.

View post:
For the Love of Guns, God, and Donald Trump - Progressive.org

Letters to the editor for Tuesday, Oct. 19: Donald Trump, HB 2001, and the leaf brigade – The Register-Guard

Eugene has been deceived by HB 2001

Eben Fodors excellent guest viewpoint criticizing local implementation of HB 2001 clearly revealed the myth of middle housing.

In recent years so-called middle housing has come full circle from where it began as small multi-unit buildings able to mitigate an affordability crisis to large single houses on tiny lots.

Now were supposed to accept the idea that a standalone house on a separate legal lot really isnt a house at all as weve always understood the term. It no longer must comply with the usual standards for single (family) houses (E.C. 9.8199(2)). A developer need only label his original lot a middle housing lot and code regulations disappear. (Note: this applies to all residential lots in the city not protected by CC&Rs).

Foder: Transformation of Eugene's diverse, older neighborhoods for good?

With a three-story height allowance, full lot coverage and no on-site parking and no tree protection (code way more extreme than the minimum requirements of HB 2001), developers and investors have been enormously gifted.

Once again, while residents bought into the feel-good vocabulary of incentivize, believing that it would deliver affordable housing it has now reemerged as incentives for those looking to profit in our housing market.

Eugeneans have been deceived and Fodor explained it well.

Carolyn Jacobs, Eugene

Regarding gas-powered leaf blowers, I offer two suggestions.

The first has to do with battery-powered garden tools, which are now affordable and effective. If a local group were to advertise an All-Electric Gardening Service, customers would line up, even if the rates were a tad high. Tool companies could sponsor battery-powered contractors. Good advertising for the sponsors.

The second revolves around an app yet to be developed, called something like Leaf Brigade. Those needing help with leaves (including local homeowners and contractors employing the local Brigade, also good advertising for the contractors) would enter the location and time for the brigadiers to show up with their rakes. These folks get the prompt from the app, grab their rakes and show up (on foot, ideally). Volunteers would dictate the physical radii of their volunteer spirit.This could also be organized locally through e-mail "FORUM" or Facebook groups.

Sheldon Lea Jones, Eugene

For several days I have read letters bashing Donald Trump. For the record I do not like his behavior either but do like most of his policies.

For you Biden voters, do you really like the borders being flooded with illegal immigrants with no control by our current administration? Trump had the borders under control.

Do you really like the higher gas prices, which were the result of our oil independence, now taken away when Biden was elected? Now he is begging OPEC to give out more oil. The Keystone XL pipeline could have helped a lot.

Inflation running rampant, all part of this administration. This is a president with a 38% approval rating without even serving a year yet. There is a reason for that: voter remorse.

Now he is being coerced to push through a $3.5 trillion bill. That would be a disaster. One of the features is expansion of Medicare benefits. Heck, our current Medicare and Social Security systems need shoring up big time. What are we doing expanding something that needs repair?

Like I said, I do not like Trump's behavior but at least he was not pulling the rug out of my feet every time I read the news.

Gordon Waske, Eugene

See the original post here:
Letters to the editor for Tuesday, Oct. 19: Donald Trump, HB 2001, and the leaf brigade - The Register-Guard

NBC’s Chuck Todd says ‘burden’ is on Biden, WH to resolve Dem infighting on spending: ‘Take control of this!’ – Fox News

Media top headlines October 18

In media news today, NBC fact-checks Anthony Fauci's COVID superspreader comments, Jon Stewart says the media is making a 'mistake' casting Trump as a 'supervillain,' and CNN's Brian Stelter frets that Katie Couric's editing scandal further damages the media's reputation

NBC News political director Chuck Todd railed against President Biden and White House amid the Democrat infighting over the two trillion-dollar spending bills being debated on Capitol Hill.

On "Sunday Today," host Willie Geist listed President Biden's stalled agenda in Congress from the failure to pass a voting bill and police reform along with the bipartisan infrastructure bill and the giant social spending bill being pushed by progressive lawmakers, asking Todd "when does this get done?"

"President Biden has to get more involved," Todd responded. "The only one that's made any progress is the bipartisan infrastructure deal. Why did that make progress? Well, the White House ran the negotiations here."

NBC'S CHUCK TODD SUGGESTS TRUMP IS TO BLAME FOR THE MEDIA NOT PUTTING A SPOTLIGHT ON DEM PROBLEMS

The "Meet the Press" moderator recalled seeing a report about the White House "getting frustrated with Congress" and how "I'm sitting here going, Well, you guys can do something about it!'"

"At the end of the day, the power of the presidency is you're the leader of the party and you're also a convening entity. Get Manchin, Sanders in a room!" Todd exclaimed, referring to the West Virginia and Vermont senators.

The MSNBC anchor then referred to the dustup between Sanders and Manchin after the progressive lawmaker penned an op-ed in a prominent West Virginia newspaper pressuring his more moderate colleague over his stance on cutting the price tag of the $3.5 trillion spending bill, telling Geist "we should be much further past this" notion that such a proposal being pushed by Sanders is no longer possible.

FILE PHOTO: Senator Joe Manchin (D-WV) flanked by reporters while leaving the Capitol building as negotiations on the bipartisan infrastructure bill continue between U.S. Senators, Representatives and White House negotiators at the U.S. Capitol building on Capitol Hill in Washington, U.S., September 30, 2021. REUTERS/Elizabeth Frantz/File Photo

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

"So the fact that we're still in this place where we're having this public back and forth about something that's not reality- at the end of the day, I think the burden's on the White House," Todd said. "They've got to take control of this. They've got to sort of get reality- the political eyes got bigger than their stomach in Congress and I think that it's up to the White House to pull them back and they haven't. They let Congress work its will and right now, its will is stalemate."

"Yeah," Geist agreed. "And all we're seeing is internal fighting between high-profile senators at this point."

See the original post here:
NBC's Chuck Todd says 'burden' is on Biden, WH to resolve Dem infighting on spending: 'Take control of this!' - Fox News

How the Taliban Control Afghan Media – Voice of America

WASHINGTON

Ask almost any senior Taliban official if there is press freedom in Afghanistan, and you'll get a ready answer.

Without a doubt, said Zabihullah Mujahid, the Talibans top spokesman and deputy minister of information and culture.

Reporters can write and publish anything that is factual and not a mere accusation. We dont have any problem with them.

Thats what Mujahid told VOA. But its far from the whole story.

Since seizing power in mid-August, the Taliban have pursued a two-pronged media strategy, projecting a press-friendly image to the outside world by holding regular press conferences, while clamping down, sometimes by force, on a once vibrant media.

Although theyve stopped short of shutting down privately owned news outlets or instituting outright censorship, Taliban officials have issued restrictions so sweeping that many outlets have had no choice but to drop critical programming and self-censor.

The Talibans so-called 11 rules of journalism prohibit publishing or broadcasting reports that are contrary to Islam and distort news content, and discourage reporting news that has not been officially confirmed. A more recent directive requires that the media refer to the Taliban by their official name: Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan.

In a report last week, Human Rights Watch said that the Taliban rules are so broad and vague as to prohibit virtually any critical reporting about the Taliban.

The effect on substantive journalism has been crippling. Gone are popular satire shows that skewered officials, replaced by religious programming favored by the Taliban. With anchors in exile or in hiding from the Taliban, TV guests parry soft-ball questions from less experienced presenters. Stories that took on religious extremism have all but vanished, local reporters say.

Everything has changed, said Kabul-based journalist Eshaq Ali Ehsas. There are no critical programs on radio and TV. Print media publish fewer critical articles. This is the clearest sign of censorship.

The repression has hit hardest in the provinces. There, away from the international spotlight, Taliban commanders have been put in charge of local departments of information and culture that oversee local media.

Although their policies vary from province to province, reporters say any criticism of the group can bring a warning or worse.

For example, reporting that the Taliban havent given women their rights is banned, a veteran reporter based in the remote Farah province, said via messaging app. Similarly, you cant report that the Taliban dont let girls go to school, the journalist said.

VOA granted anonymity to protect the reporters safety.

Journalists are allowed to cover bread-and-butter issues such as high food prices. But first, they must obtain permission from the local department of information and culture.

Without consultation and guidance from the Department of Information and Culture, you cant publish or broadcast anything, the Farah reporter said.

In Mazar-i Sharif, one of Afghanistan's largest cities, the Talibans information and culture chief ordered local reporters to submit stories along with a list of questions and interview subjects for approval before publication, according to several local journalists.

If the director likes it, he'll say, go ahead and cover it," said a long-time Mazar-i Sharif reporter working for a national TV network. "If it rubs him the wrong way, he'll say no."

Because of the risk of retaliation, VOA granted the reporter anonymity.

Stories about a recent shipment of medical supplies from Pakistan and a Shiite religious ceremony were OKd, the reporter said, but not protests by local doctors and womens rights activists. The Taliban have outlawed all public demonstrations, though they continue in some areas.

Not only were we not allowed to cover the womens protest, but several reporters were also beaten up, the reporter said.

Spokesperson Mujahid denied asking local officials to require journalists to obtain pre-approval for stories, and instead blamed it on the officials inexperience.

Some of the directors are serving in an acting capacity, he said. Theyre also new on their jobs. They need training. Well introduce them to the media afterwards.

Mujahid did not respond a question about whether the Taliban were investigating reported threats against journalists.

For the Afghan media, the Taliban system of control has been a shattering change.

These things did not exist in our laws, said Danish Karokhel, the founder and chief executive of Pajhwok Afghan News, Afghanistans leading wire service, referring to the Taliban requirement that reporters run everything by them.

Afghanistans 2004 Constitution enshrined the right to print and publish on subjects without prior submission to state authorities. Additionally, the countrys media law included a requirement to comply with international norms, something that is missing from the Talibans media rules.

At Pajhwok, editors have instructed reporters to document everything prior to filing and to always seek out comment from Taliban officials, Karokhel told VOA.

If we dont document it, our fear is that they might use it against us, Karokhel said.

Others have taken more drastic measures. After local Taliban officials demanded that reporters turn in their reports for vetting, editors at Salam Watandar, the countrys largest network of independent radio stations, decided to shun Taliban-related content.

Weve tried not to broadcast any reports about the Taliban, certainly not news in which they represent one side of the story, said Shahhussain Rasuli, chief editor at Salam Watandar.

Though the environment remains hostile, media freedom advocates in Afghanistan say there are indications that some Taliban officials have eased off.

In recent days, a number of provincial reporters have told me theyve noticed an improvement in the situation, said Hujatullah Mujadidi, vice president of the Afghanistan Independent Journalists Association.

Mujadidi said his meetings with Mujahid and other Taliban officials have given him reason to be optimistic.

Whenever I bring up these issues with the (Talibans) cultural commission and ministry of information and culture, they say theyre not against criticism because criticism brings reform, Mujadidi said.

Yet the Taliban press conferences have done little to inspire confidence among media members who see themselves under assault.

Since coming to power, the Taliban have detained at least 32 journalists, several of whom were beaten in custody last month, according to Human Rights Watch.

Basir Ebadi, a reporter who has attended three Taliban press conferences, says that journalists cant freely ask questions.

Im very worried about the future of the media and freedom of expression in Afghanistan, Ebadi said. At the moment, the Taliban are in the spotlight but as soon as the worlds attention turns away from Afghanistan, theyre going to institute new restrictions in the name of Islamic law and no one will have freedom of expression.

The rest is here:
How the Taliban Control Afghan Media - Voice of America