Media Search:



Week Ahead in Immigration: November 1, 2021 – Reuters

(Reuters) - Here are some upcoming events of interest to the immigration law community. All times are local unless stated otherwise.

Monday, Nov. 1

12:30 p.m. - A lawyer for an Iranian citizen and the Muslim school in Queens where she taught English will ask a 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals panel to revive a challenge to the federal government's decision to revoke her U.S work authorization. The government found that the Razi School did not establish its ability to pay the proper wages to Simin Nouritajer and that she had failed to show that she was sufficiently qualified for the position. A federal judge earlier this year said she lacked jurisdiction over their challenge to the decision.

The case is Nouritajer v. Cissna, 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, No. 21-632. For the plaintiffs: Thomas Moseley of Law Offices of Thomas E. Moseley. For USCIS: Rachel Balaban of the U.S. Department of Justice.

Wednesday, Nov. 3

9:30 a.m. - Lawyers for a group representing American tech workers will urge a panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit to revive a challenge to an Obama-era policy allowing international students with science and technology degrees to work in the U.S. after graduating. The Washington Alliance of Technology Workers, represented by the conservative Immigration Reform Law Institute, says the program violates federal law because upon graduating, individuals are no longer "bona fide students" eligible to extend student visas. A coalition of business groups including the U.S. Chamber of Commerce intervened in the case to defend the program.

The case is Washington Alliance of Technology Workers v. DHS, U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, No. 21-5028. For the plaintiffs: John Miano of the Immigration Reform Law Institute. For DHS: Joshua Press of the U.S. Department of Justice. For the business groups: Paul Hughes of McDermott Will & Emery.

Thursday, Nov. 4

8 a.m. (ET)- Immigrant Justice Idaho will present a two-day virtual conference on various issues involving immigration law and policy. The program will include discussions of the politics of immigration law, recent U.S. Supreme Court and appeals court rulings, comparisons of immigration policies under the Trump and Biden administrations, and a two-hour "Immigration 101" course for non-lawyer advocates.

Know of an event that could be included in an upcoming Week Ahead in Immigration? Contact Dan Wiessner at daniel.wiessner@thomsonreuters.com.

Dan Wiessner (@danwiessner) reports on labor and employment and immigration law, including litigation and policy making. He can be reached at daniel.wiessner@thomsonreuters.com.

Go here to read the rest:
Week Ahead in Immigration: November 1, 2021 - Reuters

‘Trust is a hard thing’: Manchin blows up Dem momentum – POLITICO

It was clear that Democrats had heard some version of Manchins calls for delay and pointed scrutiny before. Sen. Tammy Duckworth (D-Ill.) said it didnt seem like anything he couldnt have sent in an email. And some Democrats argued that although Manchin can be hard to predict, that he is not the type of politician to screw Biden over.

Manchin is not going to be the guy who pulls the foundation out of the Biden first-year track record, said Sen. Tim Kaine (D-Va.). I dont think hell surprise me on this.

Perhaps most perilously for the House progressives whom he criticized for holding up the $550 billion infrastructure bill, Manchin made clear that despite his warm statements about the White House's framework, he cant be viewed as an automatic yes just because hes a Democrat.

Its a major gut check for Biden and his party's fragile majorities, which require lockstep unity in the 50-50 Senate and near-total support in the House. Democrats need Manchins vote to pass the rest of Bidens climate and social spending agenda, but Manchins only real demand on Monday was that the House immediately pass the bipartisan infrastructure bill.

When it came to the $1 trillion-plus spending bill, Manchins words were far less ironclad.

"I'm open to supporting a final bill that helps move our country forward. But I'm equally open to voting against a bill that hurts our country, Manchin said, citing inflation and budget deficits as his main concerns. Democrats have linked their infrastructure and social spending bills as part of a strategic attempt to unite their disparate wings to advance major legislative goals this year.

As of Monday morning, many House Democrats projected they could vote this week on infrastructure and the social policy measure, passed using budget reconciliation rules that allow it to avoid a filibuster in the Senate. That timeline could slip past this week after Manchin's press conference, which also appeared to embolden House moderates.

Speaker Nancy Pelosi told Democrats in a closed door meeting Monday night that the House Rules panel could meet to tee up the $1.75 trillion bill as soon as late Tuesday, with floor votes later this week, according to people listening. Asked when Democrats could release final text of the bill, House Majority Whip Steny Hoyer quipped: "I wish I knew."

Some Senate Democrats conceded that Manchin had only complicated things even as he tried to offer clarity.

At this moment in time trust is a hard thing. And we dont want to give people excuses to vote against the [infrastructure bill] or against reconciliation, said Sen. Jon Tester (D-Mont.).

Progressives in the House scrambled in the wake of Manchin's unexpected criticism of the social spending bill after months of behind-the-scenes talks intended to win him over. Many of those liberals were prepared to vote yes on both of Bidens bills this week, in large part because they believed the White House had secured both senators votes on the roughly $1.75 trillion package.

While some members, including Congressional Progressive Caucus Chair Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.), mostly seemed resolved to ignore Manchin for the moment, others feared his comments could upend plans to finally vote on both the social spending and infrastructure bills this week. Pelosi informed some members over the weekend she aimed to bring both to the floor, though other senior Democrats were more skeptical of such a quick timeline given the unresolved issues.

In a uniquely fast statement released after Manchin spoke, White House press secretary Jen Psaki said Biden aides "remain confident that the plan will gain Senator Manchins support."

The infrastructure bill has twice now stalled out in the House, infuriating moderate senators who wrote it. Manchin and Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (D-Ariz.) were both top negotiators on that legislation, leading House progressives to balk at passing it without ironclad commitments on the climate and social spending bill.

The party-line reconciliation package is paid for with tax increases on the wealthy and corporations, but Manchin questioned whether that math would really add up. The bill, which is still being reworked to add prescription drug reform, has not received a score from the Congressional Budget Office.

That questioning, despite Manchins support for an infrastructure bill that the CBO says will add to the deficit, infuriated some progressives.

If theres anybody in the Democratic Caucus or elsewhere who is worried about fiscal responsibility and the deficit [the infrastructure bill] is not paid for, said Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.). The reconciliation bill is paid for in its entirety. It will not have an impact on inflation.

Manchin has raised doubts about adding paid leave and expanding Medicare to the social spending bill, comments that led to paid leave's omission from last weeks framework and a Medicare expansion getting limited to hearing aides, rather than hearing and dental coverage. As it's currently written, the bill expands early education, spends hundreds of billions of dollars to fight climate change and extends Democrats' boosted child tax credit a year.

Jayapal, who leads the nearly 100-member House progressive group, said on CNN that House Democrats are still prepared to vote on both bills in the coming days. A day earlier, Jayapal and her whip team had begun their own internal count on how many progressives were willing to back both Biden priorities this week. Many liberals had privately indicated they were ready to support both during a Sunday call. The progressive caucus will huddle again Tuesday.

And its not just Manchin who has issues. In the House, a small group of moderate Democrats are privately warning they arent ready to back Bidens broader bill on the floor this week.

Between four and eight centrists have raised concerns to leadership about either process or policy on the $1.75 trillion bill, according to one source close to the talks. Their issues range from fierce opposition to immigration reform to a proposed methane emissions fee to a demand that the bill is fully scored by independent budget analysts and that it can clear the Senate's byzantine budget rules.

Immigration is by far the most volatile issue in the House, where Pelosi can only afford to lose three Democrats on the final vote. At least three Latino Democrats have threatened to oppose any social spending bill that doesn't include immigration policy.

But a much larger group of moderates including many of the caucuss most vulnerable members have said they would tank the bill if contentious immigration provisions are included.

In addition, few Democrats want to support a bill without prescription drug reform. Democrats in the House and Senate are nearing an agreement on adding compromise language to the social spending bill that would empower Medicare to negotiate some prices down.

View original post here:
'Trust is a hard thing': Manchin blows up Dem momentum - POLITICO

IN D.C.: Biden pitches new $1.75 trillion spending blueprint to Dems that drops paid family leave – Salem Reporter

Funding for children, climate change and a new conservation corps are part of the package.

United States Capitol at dusk. (Courtesy/ Wikimedia Commons)

WASHINGTON President Joe Biden met with congressional Democrats on Capitol Hill Thursday morning to pitch lawmakers ona new slimmed-down frameworkfor what would be included in a massive social reform package.

The $1.75 trillion blueprint that Biden presented to Democrats includes a universal pre-K program for 3-and-4 year-olds, limits child care costs so that families do not pay more than 7% of their income, and extends funding for both for six years. Those two programs are estimated to cost $400 billion.

It would also extend for a year the expanded child tax credit; improve long-term care for seniors and people with disabilities; extend expanded tax credits for the Affordable Care Act; and provide the tax credits to 4 million uninsured people in states where Medicaid has not been expanded.

Notably Bidens new plan does not include paid family and medical leave, a major initiative which had been included in earlier versions of the Build Back Better plan before it was trimmed to meet demands from moderate Democrats.

Paid leave would set groundbreaking policy in the U.S., which is one of six wealthy countries in the world where no national paid parental policy exists. Most daycare centers dont accept newborns until they are six weeks old.

The White House said that Bidendeveloped the new plan after hearing input from all sides and negotiating in good faith with Senators Manchin and Sinema, Congressional Leadership, and a broad swath of Members of Congress and is confident his plan could pass Congress.

Biden also spoke to the nation Thursday morning, just before he left for a long-planned trip to Europe and a major climate conference.

The framework he presented to Democrats also provides $550 billion for climate change policy, ranging from tax credits for clean energy to investments in making communities climate resilient through a civilian climate corps.

The plan would be paid for witha 15% minimum tax on the corporate profits that large corporationsthose with over $1 billion in profitsreport to shareholders, as well as a new surtax on the income of multi-millionaires and billionaires, the wealthiest 0.02 percent of Americans, the White House said. It would apply a 5 percent rate above income of $10 million, and an additional 3 percent surtax on income above $25 million.

Its unclear if Democrats will support the new framework, particularly two Senate Democrats, Sens. Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona and Joe Manchin III of West Virginia, who have objected to tax raises on corporations and four weeks of paid parental leave.

House progressives have also warned that they want to see the bills legislative text before making a decision to vote on the package.

The leader of the House Progressive Caucus, Rep.Pramila Jayapal, (D-Wash.), said that she has an idea of whats in the framework, but wants to see the bills text, according to Capitol Hill pool reports.

We want to see the actual text because we dont want any confusion and misunderstandings, she said. My understanding is that the framework is very general. So lets turn it into legislative text. If 90% of the text is already written as the speaker has said, then it should be very quickwe can do anywhere from two to seven days.

Several major policy initiatives that Biden campaigned on have been stripped from the framework, such as paid parental leave, free community college, and climate change policy such as the Clean Energy Performance Program, which incentivized utilities to switch to clean energy and penalized those who dont.

Democrats also tried to include an expansion of the Affordable Care Act to include dental benefits in Medicare. The framework Biden is expected to show to lawmakers would help reduce premiums and have Medicare cover hearing services.

Democrats have also struggled to include immigration policy in the package after the Senate parliamentarian ruled that lawmakers cannot create a pathway to citizenship for millions of undocumented people through reconciliation, the process being used for Build Back Better that requires just a simple majority vote in the evenly divided Senate.

The White House specifies thatit would reform our broken immigration system, consistent with the Senates reconciliation rules. Some advocates have pushed for lawmakers to overturn the parliamentarians ruling in the interests of getting immigration reform enacted.

The framework Biden is presenting to lawmakers would provide $100 billion to help reduce immigration backlogs, expand legal representation and help with processing at the border.

Oregon Capital Chronicleis part of States Newsroom, a network of news bureaus supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Oregon Capital Chronicle maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Les Zaitz for questions:[emailprotected]Follow Oregon Capital Chronicle onFacebookandTwitter.

STORY TIP OR IDEA?Please send an email to Salem Reporter's news team:[emailprotected]

Read more:
IN D.C.: Biden pitches new $1.75 trillion spending blueprint to Dems that drops paid family leave - Salem Reporter

Police Activity at Arlington Heights Rd and Rand Rd Cleared by 8:35 p.m. Saturday, October 23, 2021 – arlingtoncardinal.com

3,482

Police from Arlington Heights responded about 7:50 p.m. Saturday, October 23, 2021 to a report to an undisclosed call possibly related to a suspicious incident or check for well-being near Arlington Heights Road and Rand Road in Arlington Heights.

At least 11 police units from Arlington Heights responded to the call, which may have originated near McDonalds, 1920 North Arlington Heights. The northbound lanes of Arlington Heights Road were blocked by police between Rand Road and Valley Lane.

No injuries were reported. Several witnesses reported someone may have been in handcuffs temporarily. Police appeared to be sorting out information available at the scene. There was no search for an at large suspect, and there was no crime scene investigation, no perimeter, and no extensive evidence collection at the scene.

During the on-scene investigation, a white, newer model Toyota RAV4 was stopped in the northbound lanes of Arlington Heights Road between the Northpoint Shopping Center driveway and Valley Lane. The driver of the Toyota was permitted to drive off on his own.

The scene was clear by about 8:35 p.m.

The information in this article is an early report published before any summary information was confirmed or released by police or fire authorities.

DEVELOPING IF CONTENT IS AVAILABLE

SEND A TIP! CARDINAL NEWS is seeking additional information about this case, please check out NotifyCardinalNews.com | Seeking Information About Police Activity Near Arlington Heights Road and Rand Rd Saturday Night October 23, 2021

Continue reading here:
Police Activity at Arlington Heights Rd and Rand Rd Cleared by 8:35 p.m. Saturday, October 23, 2021 - arlingtoncardinal.com

‘The Raincoat Killer’: Does Not Explain Yoo Young-Chul’s Backstory and Why His Face Was Never Revealed – Showbiz Cheat Sheet

Netflix premiered its first docu-series about one of South Koreas most prolific serial killers. The Raincoat Killer: Chasing a Predator in Korea delved deep into the police investigation to apprehend Yoo Young-chul. As the three-episode docu-series used never before seen archival footage to detail Yoos horrific murder spree, it never fully explains his motives for killing.

The Raincoat Killer starts from the very beginning where police realize they have a serial killer on their hands who targeted the wealthy and prostitutes. While watching the series, viewers questioned why Yoos face was never revealed. Many felt the docu-series missed a few key markers into the mind of Yoos killer psyche.

The docu-series begins like any other. In the early 2000s, serial killers were still rare and few in South Koreas. In the countries history, there were not many that plagued fear in the streets. But, when the police catch wind of a break-in and murder case, it starts to unravel the dark and bloody path of what would become the countrys worst killer. The docu series begins with the murder of an elderly woman. At the time, the police force kept information to themselves and rarely cooperated with other precincts.

During the crime scene investigation, footprints were found at the scene. Piecing together the evidence, the police realized the same pattern appeared at other murder sites in other areas of Seoul. A majority of The Raincoat Killer entails the investigation that leads to Yoo Young-chul.

Police were left with no leads as they could not figure out the murder weapon used or if the victims had someone in common. They soon realized the perpetrator had a much bigger kill count than they expected. And by a stroke of luck, stumbled upon Yoo, the killer.

RELATED: 4 Must-Watch Horror-Thriller K-Dramas to Watch This Halloween Season

By 2004, Yoo admitted to killing 20 victims, all of which were wealthy elderly and sex workers. The docu-series explain South Koreas economic problems at the time Yoo started killing. During Koreas financial crisis, the gap between social classes became bigger than ever before. According to The New York Post, one officer said, The rich got richer, and the poor got poorer.

The police attribute the financial crisis as part of the reason why Yoo targeted rich elderly victims. One of his first kills was a retired college professor and his wife in their home in 2003. But, The Raincoat Killer does not delve into Yoos anger toward the rich stemming from his childhood.

According to The Chosunilbo, Yoo grew up in a poor household. Yoo was also bullied by his peers because of his familys lack of money. As a child, he longed to live in an extravagant home like the one on his block. Yoos anger toward the rich only intensified during the crisis. Yoo soon switches to targeting sex workers as his victims.

In The Raincoat Killer, the police explain Yoo picked sex workers because of a failed relationship. Yoo also knew he could get rid of his victims and no one would notice. The Chosunilbo further explains, Yoo murdered women because of his lover betraying him, and he killed women who had similar jobs to his ex-lover out of a retaliatory spirit. The docu-series does not explain Yoos divorce from his wife and his past conviction for sexually assaulting a teenage girl.

RELATED: Inspector Koo: Promises Comedy, Crime Investigation, and Young Serial Killer in Netflix Trailer

Fans on social media were confused why the docu-series never revealed Yoos face. There is a reason for this. Besides keeping the secretive allure of a mass serial killer, authorities never showed Yoos face to the public after his arrest. The detectives took Yoo to the location where he buried his victims. Because of the mass media coverage, the detectives needed to cover his face.

A detective in the docu-series explained he had a mask and hat sitting on his desk and made Yoo wear it before leaving the precinct. Throughout the investigation, the police had no idea about Yoos identity or how he looked. Even Google searches only come up with one image of Yoos face. It was during his younger years with Yoo wearing a suit and tie in a portrait.

The docu-series raised fan reactions when a video of Yoos walk out of the precinct showed an officer kicking one of the victims mothers when she tried to take off his hat. Even today, police have never revealed a photo of Yoo. The reasoning behind never releasing Yoos face to the public is still unknown.

Read this article:
'The Raincoat Killer': Does Not Explain Yoo Young-Chul's Backstory and Why His Face Was Never Revealed - Showbiz Cheat Sheet