Media Search:



Red Pill Expo at Cajundome this weekend to discuss COVID-19 conspiracy theories – The Advocate

A group that believes the COVID-19 pandemic is part of a plot for elites to seize global power is bringing a host of conspiracy theorists to speak this weekend at the Cajundome Convention Center.

The Red Pill Expo 2021, a creation of author and conspiracy theorist G. Edward Griffin, will meet in Lafayette Saturday and Sunday and is expected to draw 750 visitors. The event, which includes discussions on topics such as Follow the patents and you will understand COVID and Vaccine resistance, a global movement, is billed on its website as helping truth seekers understand how the world really works.

Admission ranges from nearly $400 for VIP tickets to $215 for both days, $125 for one day or $45 to live stream.

The event has been held in other cities around the country in recent years with a mission to bring people together to discuss fake narratives, fake history and fake news, according to its website.

It showcases many of the alt-right theories, a Southern Poverty Law Center spokesman said prior to the 2018 event in Washington.

The event is a marketplace for conspiracy theories, said Ryan Lenz with the SPLC.

The red-pill reference can be traced back to the film "The Matrix" in which the main character is encouraged to "take the red pill," which will open his eyes to the truth.

We'll keep you posted on the Acadiana economy. Sign up today.

Griffin, according to published reports, believes cancer is a nutritional deficiency that can be cured by taking a certain compound, and that HIV does not cause AIDS. He is a longtime member of the conservative John Birch Society.

A notable speaker planned is Dr. Lee Merritt of Nebraska, who made the claims that getting vaccinated increases your risk of death from COVID, something data does not support. Published reports indicated she claimed the pandemic is a global conspiracy aimed to exerting social control.

The presentations at the event will be based on documented information, said event director Dan Happel.

One of the things we work on very diligently is we do not provide false information, Happel said. We only provide verifiable, documented information.

The event landed in Lafayette, he noted, due to the efforts of local businessman John Cambre, who attended two previous Red Pill Expo events. Cambre is owner of one of the Ground Pati Grill and Bar, which is listed on the expos website as an exhibitor.

In a prepared statement, Cajundome officials said they do not discriminate on the basis of political agenda, music genre or artist. The event had been booked within the last six months, director Pam Deville said.

We are merely a venue, the statement read.

Read the original here:
Red Pill Expo at Cajundome this weekend to discuss COVID-19 conspiracy theories - The Advocate

Welcome to anti-Cop26: The climate-change denial expo in Vegas where attendees talk anything but science – The Independent

All the signage and branding is forest green, decorated with a leaf emblem, for the Heartland Institutes International Conference on Climate Change. Its being held in an event room at Caesars Palace in Las Vegas, and attendees most of them white-haired, older gentlemen chat animatedly as they saunter past the Roman columns and statues at the famed hotel, talking about science and climate and energy.

There are retired teachers, scientists, engineers, members of ultra-conservative think tanks and lobby groups. The books being handed out for free look a little fringe or inflammatory with covers featuring war scenes and explosions but its not until the speeches begin at the opening dinner that it becomes abundantly clear that science and climate are not the primary focus of this conference.

Within about an hour, booming, charismatic speakers both at the podium and through video rope in rants about everything from critical race theory and the media to mask mandates and Marxism.

It feels like a low-level, alt-right rally which reaches its peak with a video appearance by Naomi Seibt, the young, blonde, German rock star of the climate-denial movement. Shes often referred to as the anti-Greta, as she is known for pushing views diametrically opposed to those of Swedish teen climate activist Greta Thunberg.

Research published last week revealed that 99.9 per cent of studies now show that the climate crisis is human-driven, on a par with scientific certainty about evolution. The world is on track for temperature rises in excess of 3C this century despite a safe limit of 1.5C set by the Paris Agreement. At 3C, the world will see more hurricanes, fires, ice-cap melting and other extreme weather conditions.

This years UN climate summit, Cop26, is widely seen as the moment when countries must raise their ambitions and goals to avert climate disaster by reducing global carbon emission by roughly half by 2030.

Books, pamphlets and other literature at the Heartland Institutes October climate-change conference in Las Vegas sought to deconstruct mainstream arguments and established research

(Sheila Flynn)

It is a goal that the oil and gas industry is not taking lying down, despite its overtures to transitioning to a greener future. Since the Paris Agreement, the five largest publicly traded oil and gas majors ExxonMobil, Royal Dutch Shell, Chevron, BP and Total have invested more than $1bn of shareholder funds on misleading climate-related branding and lobbying, according to InfluenceMap.

And then theres Vegas.

The Heartland Institute was traditionally funded by fossil fuels but says most financing now comes from private donations.

Dr John Cook, professor at the Centre for Climate Change Communication at George Mason University and founder of the Skeptical Science website, told The Independent last year that Heartland was one of the particularly prolific producers of climate science misinformation, whereas a lot of others tend to focus on policy.

The Chicago-based right-wing think tank bills itself as playing an essential role in the national (and increasingly international) movement for personal liberty and limited government, saying it has been the subject of unfair criticism and even libel by various liberal advocacy groups, elected officials and even Wikipedia.

At the keynote breakfast speech on the closing morning of the three-day conference, Ms Seibt, a Heartland favourite, echoes this position.

The climate debate has been driving a narrative of fear and delusion for years but now we find ourselves in a cluster of fear porn, not only from a climate crisis but also from a global health apocalypse, allegedly, Ms Seibt tells the conference, her long hair flowing over a silver jacket, her glamorous eye make-up flawless.

I find myself in a community of heroes who will not succumb to the pressures of defamation, because they know how important the truth is, she continues. We dont believe in instant gratification. We know that we need to go through a dark and dangerous tunnel to get our true freedoms back, because whats the alternative? Lying to ourselves? Putting on a mask and living the same meaningless matrix, pretentious, Marxist lives like everybody else?

The tone of Heartland literature and many presentations is persecuted but defiant and provocative. The Vegas weekend involves the presentation of the combatively-named Dauntless Purveyor of Climate Truth award, for example.

Try as they might, governments couldnt keep us locked down forever, Heartland president James Taylor proclaims in the institutes quarterly performance report being distributed at the conference.

The branding at the Heartland Institutes International Climate on Conference Change gave no hint as to the events diametrically-opposed views to mainstream climate science

(Sheila Flynn)

Now that we are regaining some of our freedoms, Heartland is sticking it to the environmental left ... The worst of the lockdowns are over, and freedom is rising again.

With Heartlands powerful impact on the global warming debate, its no wonder the Big Government left fears returning to a free and open society!

The overarching messages during the conference at least the ones related to climate posit that the Earth has always undergone extreme weather cycles. Speakers claim that climate changes are happening so gradually that a catastrophe lies only far in the future and shouldnt be cause for alarmism right now.

They argue that the cause has been hijacked by the media and the left, among other influences, to enforce an agenda of misinformation that will lead to worldwide tyranny.

I spent the past 18 months compiling iron-clad evidence about the Great Reset and about those behind it, says Justin Haskins, Heartlands editorial director, in a recorded video message.

Leaning into the camera, the bookcase behind him featuring items including an American flag, a Glenn Beck book, and a black-and-white pendant proclaiming Liberty or Death (both the colours and the phrase are associated with the alt-right movement), Mr Haskins looks every inch the zealot.

Is it a conspiracy theory? he asks of the climate crisis and left ideology. Well, there is a conspiracy. At this point, I dont think its a conspiracy theory; I think its a conspiracy fact.

Ms Seibt builds upon these ideas, proclaiming in her recorded message that social justice is a euphemism.

We believe in true, individual social connections hugging each other, being there for each other, not this cold-blooded second-hand welfare slave system, she says.

Eco-fascism is a prime example of that. We win, because we are greater than our grudges, more adamant than our adversaries, more truthful than our tormentors, and more compassionate than the cowards who want to control us with their ... censorship.

Truth is uncontrollable. The scientific method will prevail, because politicised science is not science at all. It is stagnation, and stagnation is the death of science.

Ms Seibt and other speakers call for open scientific discourse and demand their voices be heard while slamming the media repeatedly. One panellist shows to applause a photo of himself throwing a journalist out of an event. Another exhibits a political cartoon declaring the death of capitalism.

Heartland Institutes Justin Haskins delivered an impassioned video message that spoke less about climate than it did about combatting socialism, Marxism and misinformation from the left'

(Sheila Flynn)

On Saturday, one speaker and filmmaker showcasing his own documentary Climate Hustle 2 doesnt help the causes arguments for open discourse as he lambasts a reporter in the hallway outside the booked conference rooms.

Youre just an uneducated reporter, he shouts at a British television journalist querying him on scientific points, his voice rising.

Mr Morano runs a climate-change denial website in addition to directing and starring in Climate Hustle 2, narrated by Hercules: The Legendary Journeys actor Kevin Sorbo, which mocks celebrities who speak about climate.

The filmmaker himself has no scientific credentials. He does, however, have a demeanour reminiscent of Anthony Scaramucci.

Now whos the one spreading misinformation? he shouts at the journalist when she tries to delve into statistics from research. He drowns her out: You obviously have no source. Youre just repeating [yourself].

Heartland Institutes vice-president and director of communications, Jim Lakely, looks vaguely stricken by the exchange as it escalates though he later tries damage control by telling The Independent that he kind of likes a bit of argey-bargey, and the more animation the better.

Not everyone at the conference is antagonistic, though. One attendee is an investment manager from Connecticut who, while sceptical of certain climate-crisis claims, says he came to the event because climate and energy are so intertwined with financial markets.

Another, George Taylor, tells The Independent he has PhDs in both mathematics and computer science and is more interested in exploring energy sources than listening to diatribes unsupported by facts.

The whole point is to get your message to the other person and have them actually understand something they could walk away with, Mr Taylor, based in Reno, tells The Independent describing the previous nights volatile scene between filmmaker Mr Morano and the journalist as unproductive.

Rather than yelling and screaming and making it political, lets get down to some numbers and some facts, he tells The Independent, after detailing how a Nevada friend gave him grief about attending the conference. (She only reads liberal sources like The Washington Post, he adds.)

There may be a significant amount that we dont know, so were actually taking a guess and deciding to what degree are we going to take preventative action to ward off what may be a problem ... sometimes, you have to act in the absence of perfect knowledge.

Amidst that uncertainty, however, Mr Taylor concedes that it would be more beneficial to impart the facts without yelling and screaming and ranting.

The Heartland Institutes October Climate Conference in Las Vegas seemed more focused on political aims than environmental concerns

(Sheila Flynn)

Regardless of what some consider the fringe element of climate science, however, many of the attendees the ones less concerned with politics and more interested in research do seem to have their hearts in the right place. They feel they genuinely are environmental activists but on a whole different plane from the mainstream.

Everyone here is smart and everyone is sincere, the wife of one panellist tells The Independent.

What that sincerity might lead to, however after the weekends near-palpable undercurrent of right-wing ideology remains in doubt.

Heartlands Mr Haskins says: Beneath the glowing stars-and-stripes veneer is a terminally ill superpower teetering on the edge and the worst part is our most disruptive, dangerous days still lie ahead.

At lavish cocktail parties in European resort towns and in the boardrooms of the worlds largest corporations, powerful and influential leaders are putting the finishing touches on the vast infrastructure need to alter our communities forever.

The calls to action over the weekend are repeatedly spelled out: Run for office. Push back.

Resist.

Our open, free minds are untouchable in the end therefore panic will persist until we resist, Ms Seibt tells rapt listeners.

And we resist now.

View post:
Welcome to anti-Cop26: The climate-change denial expo in Vegas where attendees talk anything but science - The Independent

The Worst Chess Game Ever – Chess.com

Throughout our entire lives, we keep looking for the best. The best colleges, best workplaces, best vacation spots, etc. The list is endless. Of course, in our chess universe we also follow this same trend and search for the best games and best players of all time.

I wonder, why is no one looking for the worst? [Ed. Note: We are sometimes!] Well, there is no point to search for the worst chess player since he is well known. At least, it is if we trust U.S. Secretary of State Henry Kissinger in 1972, who called GM Bobby Fischer and introduced himself as "the worst chess player in the world... calling the best player in the world".

But what about the worst chess game ever played? You might wonder why we would even need to look for such a horrible game. Well, besides the obvious human curiosity, there is a clear utility such a game might provide. Say you are a beginning chess player: Which game would you rather prefer to analyze, one by two super GMs played with nearly 100% accuracy, or the following game, which I saw as a kid in one of my first chess books?

I don't know about you, but I smiled when I saw this game for the first time. Meanwhile, the near-perfect game played by two super-GMs would have just bored me at that time. Besides, learning that outrageous game, where Black got checkmated in just three moves, assured that I would never lose a game the same way, as happened in the Chess Olympiad not so long ago:

So, what criteria should we use to determine the worst game ever played? If it is just educational value that demonstrates what you should never do in chess, then the following "game" would be close to the top of my list of worst ever:

To be fair, these horrible king moves didn't lead to excessive damage (most of us would still lose to GM Magnus Carlsen even after he plays 2. Ke2??). Should we then consider the degree of damage caused by a bad move? If so, not many games can compete with such ultimate blunders as the following well-known examples.

We are all guilty of saying something like "I just played the worst game in the whole history of chess" after losing an especially painful game. GM Tigran Petrosian probably thought the same way after he made an outrageous blunder in a very important tournament.

I just don't think it is fair to call a game 'the worst ever" based on a single blunder, no matter how bad it was. For example, the Petrosian game above is actually an excellent example of constricting an opponent. As a matter of fact, if not for the tragic blunder, it would have been added to Petrosian's collection of positional masterpieces.

It is obvious that in order to be considered "the worst ever," a game should be played consistently badly, from beginning to end. Take the following game, for example:

When one of the world's best grandmasters performs like an amateur player, we know that the game is very bad. By the way, my apologies to amateur playersI know that many of you can play better than that!

Yet even games where truly bad moves were played from beginning to end might not always be good material for our contest. Take, for example, the following notorious game:

It is a well-known fact that this game was played under protest, as was this infamous contest:

And I don't even want to know what kind of events forced two masters to produce the following recent gem:

As you can see, it is not easy to determine the worst chess game ever played. Therefore, when IM Ali Mortazavi tweeted that he would like to nominate the worst game of chess I was quite skeptical. However, upon looking at the game, I think he has a valid point. Judge for yourself:

While blunders are an integral part of bullet chess, here it was a bit too much. Six consecutive blunders of checkmate in one within three moves, by players rated above 2400 must be the world record. Seven blunders like this in a game that lasted just 15 moves is also a tough record to beat!

So, is this indeed the worst game ever played or do you, my dear readers, have your own nominations? Let us know in the comments below!

Read more:
The Worst Chess Game Ever - Chess.com

Announcing The 2021 Bughouse World Championship – Chess.com

We are happy to announce the 2021-2022 Bughouse World Championship! The beloved variant championship starts on November 8 and will extend through January 2022. The strongest bughouse players in the world will come together to fight for their piece of the $5,000 prize fund. With an open and a U2000 section, the event is sure to be entertaining for players of all levels!

Bughouse has always been one of the favorite and most popular chess variants in the world. Already a tradition in over-the-board tournaments, the variant also took the internet by storm after it became available on Chess.com. Since then, many elite players and streamers have enjoyed playing bughouse online, including incredibly strong GMs like Hikaru Nakamura and Yasser Seirawan.

The event is being organized by bughouse expert Chuck Moulton and members of the bughouse community on Chess,com. Moulton will be providing commentary throughout the event. He is a known streamer in the chess variants community and has vast experience in bughouse. Make sure you tune in to his Twitch channel as well as Chess.com's events channel to enjoy the live broadcast of the event!

You can fill out the official sign-up form below until November 5 if you want to jump in on the bughouse action. For more information about the event, check out Moulton's guide here.

Read the original:
Announcing The 2021 Bughouse World Championship - Chess.com

Facebook should not have bowed to public outrage and shut down its facial recognition system, former world chess champion says – CNBC

A comparison of an original and deepfake video of Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg.

Elyse Samuels | The Washington Post | Getty Images

LISBON, Portugal Facebook is wrong to shut down its facial recognition system, according to Gary Kasparov, the former world chess champion and chairman of the Human Rights Foundation.

The decision, announced Tuesday, is "stupid" Kasparov told CNBC at the Web Summit tech conference in Lisbon.

"It's bowing to this public outrage," Kasparov said Wednesday, just days after Facebook rebranded itself to Meta. "Personally, I think it's stupid for a simple reason: Facebook can shut it down, the Chinese will not."

Facebook did not immediately respond to a CNBC request for comment.

Born into what was then the Soviet Union, Kasparov became the youngest ever undisputed World Chess Champion in 1985 at age 22. In 1997 he became the first world champion to lose a match to a computer: IBM's Deep Blue.

Today, he says he is pro-technology and against overregulation.

"Any technological feature that's available, for me, it doesn't make any sense to block it," Kasparov said. Privacy campaigners would strongly disagree.

He added: "It's insane to think that in the era of global internet, you can actually start forcing companies in America or in Europe to follow these rules and to abandon new features."

Former world chess champion Garry Kasparov speaks during 2018's Web Summit in Lisbon, Portugal.

Pedro Fiuza | NurPhoto | Getty Images

The decision to shut down the facial recognition system on Facebook comes amid a barrage of news reports over the past month after Frances Haugen, a former employee turned whistleblower, released a trove of internal company documents to news outlets, lawmakers and regulators.

Facebook said in a blogpost that there are "many concerns" about the use of facial recognition technology in society, noting how regulators are still in the process of providing a clear set of rules governing its use.

"Amid this ongoing uncertainty, we believe that limiting the use of facial recognition to a narrow set of use cases is appropriate," the social media giant said.

Ending the use of the face recognition system is part of "a company-wide move away from this kind of broad identification," Facebook said.

In 2012, Facebook acquired Israeli start-up Face.com for reportedly under $100 million, snapping up a team of developers who focused on facial recognition for mobile apps. The deal came just months after Facebook acquired Instagram, CEO Mark Zuckerberg's biggest effort at the time to move the business to mobile.

In July 2020, the company agreed to pay a $650 million settlement after it was sued for collecting and storing biometric data without first getting user consent, which is prohibited by the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act.

- Additional reporting by CNBC's Salvador Rodriguez.

Read the original here:
Facebook should not have bowed to public outrage and shut down its facial recognition system, former world chess champion says - CNBC