Mediaboss Marketing

The simple answer is no.

Easiest analogy;

You are the host of a party. You then invite 11 other people, for a party of 12 people. One member of your party (let's call them W) is not liked by 3 other members (we will call them 'the clique'). During the party, 2 members of 'the clique' talk about W to every other member of the party to the point where some of the other guests dissociate from W. Can blame W blame you for defamation?

I would say yes if any one of these conditions could be met:

(A) You would have to have known about the nature of the relationship between W and 'the clique' prior to inviting all of them to the same party.

(B) You would have to have knowledge of and ignored the actions of 'the clique' during the party.

(C) You would have to have knowledge of and ignored any request W made to limit 'the cliques' actions.

In this situation you are social media, W is a public figure, 'the clique' are bad actors, and the other guests are random users.

Condition A requires websites confirm identities with background checks (Think Chinese internet). This is possible, but expensive for small private sites (like JapanToday) and could be seen as invasive for those who could pull it off (like Alphabet/Google or Meta/Facebook).

Condition B requires that the websites not moderate or monitor what discussions happen between it users. Users are not free to share any kind of content between other users (hi moderators, watch this get edited) on any website. Facebook will take down content it does not like, JapanToday will lock comment sections and delete posts deemed inappropriate.

Condition C requires websites to receive complaints and not act on them. Facebook has historically had no direct phone number but there is a reporting system and again they will delete content. JapanToday has a reporting system in place and does delete comments.

While there is an argument to be made about the decision-making process and timing of editing, moderating, and presenting content, it is hard to argue that a third party can act in a way that exposes a media company to defamation.

More:
Do you think media companies should be held liable for defamatory third-party comments on their Facebook pages or discussion boards? - Japan Today

The promise of new technologies bombards us. As a manager, investor, entrepreneur, or innovator, which of these technologies should you monitor closely in 2022? Is it AI and its promise of penetrating more businesses and practices, or should you focus on Web 3.0 and its disruption of Web 2.0?

In this post, I present my thinking and how I came up with the shortest list in the world for technologies to watch in 2022.

Let's take a closer look at which technologies should interest us in 2022

While working on my list of technologies to watch, I stumbled across a research paper by Lei Mi from the Chinese Academy of Sciences in Shannxi, which I found inspirational.

In his paper, Mi introduces the term "Key Core Technologies" that are the "cornerstone to boosting economic and social progress." Mi explains that as technologies continuously evolve, all new technologies are combined and integrated from earlier ones. As technologies upgrade and deliver greater value, we see a dramatic increase in productivity that facilitates rapid social and economic advances that are enabled by a shortlist of "key core technologies."

Mi explains that Key Core Technologies is the "cornerstone of the technical system" and are based on "scientific discovery and technological invention." Most importantly, Key Core Technologies have these three attributes:

In many cases, the Key Core Technologies, with their powerful attributes, kick off new "Technology Waves." For example, we went through the"Connectivity" wavenot too many years ago. Web and Mobile technologies were the "Key Core Technologies" of the day, and companies like Apple and Google were the day's heroes.

With more web pages to browse and mobile devices to carry around, we discovered the value of data and leaped from the "connectivity" to the"data" wave. That's when big data captured our imagination, and companies like Facebook and Netflix served as excellent examples of how big data can benefit client experiences through personalization, for example.

With enough data under our possession, we arrived at the"wave of intelligence,"where we are today. AI and Machine Learning come to our aid to make sense of our data and turn data into insights and insights to actions.

What lies ahead is open to interpretation. Some argue the next big tech wave will not be digital at all. Instead, it will be the age of disruptive technologies such as Synthetic Biology and Nanotech. Others claim we have yet to scratch the surface of AI, that technology enablers such as Augmented and Virtual Reality will take us to the Metaverse. While at the same time, Blockchain and Decentralization will open up the way to Web 3.0.

This is what the full-stack engineer of the future may look like

The exciting thing about the different technology waves, and the Key Core Technologies enabling each wave, is the "vocabulary" of these technologies.

If you think, for example, of the initial wave described above, the wave of connectivity, it had its unique and new vocabulary: cloud computing, touch screens, app's, 3G, or GPS, to name a few terms of the day. The companies that were first to understand this vocabulary how to utilize it to product and venture building are the biggest in the world.

Companies that did not understand the "vocabulary" were pushed back or diminished altogether.

The lesson to learn is that understanding what thecurrent tech waveis, which are theKey Core Technologiesto monitor, and understanding thevocabularyof these waves and technologies is existential to business success. If, for example, there is good reason to believe NFT's will disrupt the gaming industry, and your company plays in this domain and does not understand the unique vocabulary of NFT's - expect troubles on the way. Even if it's just because your competitors can speak fluent "NFTish" and will grab the business opportunities they unlock. Sometimes it's as simple as Nokia CEO's message from hisfarewell speech: "We didn't do anything wrong, but somehow, we lost." So that "somehow" could very well be the illiteracy of the day's technology.

So which Key Core Technologies should we pay attention to in 2022? The list is surprisingly short, which speaks loads to these technologies' Revolutionary, Essentiality, and Leadership powers.

First on the list is AI. It may sound like Artificial Intelligence has been around for a long time, but actually, we are just starting to benefit from this technology's capabilities. The bigAlphaGo neural network breakthroughis just as old as my laptop, six years old. AI is revolutionary in that it is the first time we can train machines to learn independently. Admittedly, for the first few years of deploying AI, 90% of what we did was look for patterns in data. We could do beautiful things by looking for patterns in data, such as personalized experiences or utilizing assets in more beneficial ways.

But now, there are new advancements. For example, withGenerative Adversarial Networks(when two machines can compete with each other to become more accurate in their predictions) orTransformers(a deep learning model that adopts the mechanism of self-attention), we can leap forward to new functionalities.

Here's an example; you can find a trace of these technologies in your Gmail when you type a sentence, AI can complete it for you, or if we push these tech capabilities to the extreme, an autonomous robot in a warehouse can train itself on how to move about safely- whichis impressive because machines are starting to teach themselveshow to complete very complicated tasks.

Amazon Go is still a great example of how IoT and AI come together to provide a better client ... [+] experience

The second core key technology to consider isIoT- and the unique thing about IoT is that it enables us to connect the Physical and Cyber worlds. So what does it mean to join the cyber and physical worlds? Here's an example: Think of an Amazon website. Every item a visitor to the Amazon website "click" links to a unique page; every decision triggers algorithms to help personalize the experience. But when you think about the physical world in comparison, it is mostly not intelligent and not connected, so you and I can double-tap a bottle of wine at the shop all day long, and it will not provide me with any helpful information. Now think about the "amazon go" store, that's the shop where you can pick up a product from any shelf and walk out, as there is no queue to pay.

It's a great example where IoT digitizes the physical world, and products, environments, and spaces can become intelligent and automated. This combination of AI and IoT (also known as AioT) provides us with a new perspective on how people move and interact in physical spaces. In addition, it can seamlessly connect with existing cameras and generate insights using out-of-the-box AI-powered skills. For example, AioT can transform and disrupt commerce and enable fraud detection in the real world. Furthermore, it can help improve employee safety. Finally, we must understand the vocabulary of AioT as it will continue to evolve and impact businesses in the coming years.

Which technologies did not make my Key Core Technologies watch list, but I'll watch anyway? A few have the potential to evolve into KCT in the future and already have the potential to disrupt industries. If you are looking for near-term returns, the biggest challenge with these technologies is how long it will take these technologies to mature and scale. There is enough evidence that once they hit sufficient maturity and scalability level, they will disrupt many industries; however, it is unclear how long this maturity phase will take.

I'm a bit split of AR and VR fall under the definition of "Key Core Technology." For example, one could argue that AR and VR devices combine commoditized software tools and cutting-edge IoT and AI capabilities. In that sense, AR and VR are tail technology of AioT. Even if we go beyond the devices up the tech stack and climb towards platforms and applications layers that provide the complete package of an AR/VR solution, those layers use existing technologies.

However, we need to watch these technologies because of their disruptive potential. I'm not convinced either AR or VR will become "Leading" technologies as Lei Mi defines them. Still, they will create drastically different user experiences and new business models. They deserve to be on the "watch us" list of technologies on these two fronts alone.

So why should we be excited about AR and VR? If we use AI to understand the context of what is happening and use IoT to connect the physical and digital worlds, we can use AR and VR to mesh these worlds together.

We hear more and more about the Metaverse and how we will experience it using AR and VR. AR and VR, or XR, or another name used to describe these capabilities, is "spatial computing." All point in the same direction of new ways to interface with data & collaborate in additive (augmented reality) and immersive (virtual) ways.

As these technologies mature, we should expect some exciting things will happen:

VR did not make the list but is a strong contender

Here the plot thickens even further. First off, some would argue Blockchain is not a "technology" compared to the way AI is a technology. Regardless, Blockchain could becomeRevolutionary, even if what we see to date is more of an evolution of Blockchain and not a revolution.

It's been over a decade since the elusive Satoshi Nakamoto published his (hers?)white paperestablishing a model for Blockchain. Ten years have passed since Laszlo Hanyecz traded his Bitcoins to gettwo pizzasfrom a local pizza store, which may very well be the first-ever Bitcoin trade.

We must ask ourselves a difficult question. Over this decade, did Blockchain disrupt any industry? The short answer is it did not. It did disrupt many people's bank accounts as the volume of trading in crypto and nowNFT'sis constantly growing. To this end, it is hard to claim Blockchain is "Essential" in the same way IoT or AI have become, and it is not "Leading" either. But oh... the potential. Many talented people are backed by smart and not so smart money, focused on making Blockchain reality in contracts, finance, healthcare, and yes, possibly even rebuilding the world wide web to a new Web 3.0 configuration. So no, Blockchain is not a Key Core Technology yet, but if things go as planned (or wished), it will graduate to this level. So let's continue and monitor this "technology" closely.

True, many of us worldwide don't have a stable 5G connectivity, but the midnight oil is already burning in faraway labs where6G is under development. As expected, it will be tremendously faster than 5G; some numbers claim 100X faster. And the reason this matter is because, for the IoT, AI, Blockchain, and AR/VR world we are envisioning, a vehicle to transport data at faster speeds is a must. On the flip side, without the advancements of 5 and 6G, some experiences and business models we hear about will never mature. 5 and 6G are more of a critical enabler than a Key Core Technology. If these faster modes of communication will cover the world, or if an alternative will arise, both will help disrupt multiple markets and industries in collaboration with IoT, AI, AR/VR, and Blockchain.

Now, You might be wondering why there are only two key core technologies?

It just shows the Leading strengths of IoT and AI. these core technologies are so powerful that if we combine IoT and AI, we get digital twins; autonomous vehicles, AmazonGo style shops, and an endless number of other Intelligent and Automated applications.

But there is one other thing that is super interesting about these technologies: they definenew business opportunities.

When these technologies (including their long-tail of sub-technologies) combine,different opportunity areasemerge with unique & fundamentally better ways to solve business problems - ways that were not possible before the emergence of these technologies.

For example, when we combine the power of AI and IoT weachieveintelligent automation: we can shift responsibilities from humans to machines. So we can move from human-led operations to bionic operations. In Bionic environments, AI augments our capabilities; it's like having a little secret helper that whispers in your ear and helps you complete tasks in a better way.

If you used Waze to drive to work this morning, it's one example of how AI augments our ability to get more efficiently from one place to another. At its extreme, Intelligent Automation leads to fully autonomous operations, where humans are entirely out of the loop.

An excellent example of a company that pushedIntelligent Automationto the extreme isOcado, an online supermarket in the UK with one of the most advancedautomated robotic warehouses. This warehouse was not designed for people or to streamline the operation between people and machines. It was designed with a "robots first approach," - and this allowed to build an environment where robots can operate and collaborate autonomously in fulfilling online shopping at an extreme speed and efficiency.

Another business opportunity lives in the intersection of Blockchain & AI that enablesDecentralization and Trust.Once we "decentralize," we can bring trust, security, and traceability into many use cases. An example of Decentralization to bring "trust" to the food we eat and improve supply chains' impact on climate and sustainability isOpenSC, a .org I had the pleasure of supporting during its incubation.

OpenSC uses AI and Machine Learning, IoT sensors, and Blockchain to verify claims about sustainable food production, trace products across supply chains, and share this information with businesses and consumers.Nestle is a recent joiner to OpenSC"to provide consumers with the ability to trace their products right back to their origins." There are other aspects of Decentralization that can benefit businesses beyond the hyped Crypto and NFT opportunities that grab the headlines; companies like OpenSC will bring the benefits of Blockchain to more industries.

Another is the opportunity for Key Core Technologies (and soon to be KCT,) to converge and enableSpatial Creation & Collaboration.These are the more futuristic worlds of AR, VR, Metaverse, and Web 3.0. As I discussed inmy post on Metaverse opportunities, there is still some work before these technologies mature and scale. But we are already seeing initial Proof of Concepts and Minimal Viable Products that hint at their hidden potential. Here's an interesting example:

At the last CES in Las Vegas, Hyundai, which collaborates with Boston Dynamics, (that's the company that makesSpotthe dog-robot and all of the videos of theparkour robotsyou can see on youtube) announced a Metaverse collaboration.

This collaboration will enable users to enter a virtual world representing a different location on Earth or another planet. At the same time, a robot will be present at the physical site that the virtual world is simulating. By bringing the virtual and physical worlds together, the human operator in the virtual world will manipulate objects or machines at the remote physical side. The on-site robot will repeat every movement the human operator makesgenuinely fantastic stuff.

2 other business opportunities worth mentioning:

So we have the core technologies and the broad opportunity areas that they create. Still, to deliver value with these technologies, there is one more thing we need to do, and that is to align desirability, Feasibility, and Viability. Let's unpack what I mean:

We need to align the stars between theFeasibility & maturityof these technologies tothe desirability of use cases and the Viability of business models.

Going through such an exercise can help identify technological maturity, our client needs, and business models. Such an exercise also helps identify opportunities in the near or far term.

But more importantly, it helps us understand which technologies hold the most significant potential for us, so we can keep them on our "important technologies to watch" list.

As promised, a short list of technologies to watch, but hopefully one that will deliver value,

See more here:
The World's Shortest List Of Technologies To Watch In 2022 - Forbes

As racial tensions simmer at an all-time high in this country, I certainly have many more questions than opinions on the subject because what I see and hear does not always make sense. But, as good documentaries should, Amadeuz ChristsOut of Darknessnot only answers many of my questions but broadens my understanding of the issues beyond what I imagined. The film rightfully challenged many of my original opinions and assumptions on being Black in America.

The film delves into the untold history of African people and the systemic removal of their history for supremacist reasons. The documentary consists primarily of archival photos, films, and artifacts with a series of talking-head interviews with Black historians, anthropologists, and activists. Those interviewed include Dr. Umar Johnson, Tony Browder, Dr. Claud Anderson, Tim Wise, Prof. James Small, and Dr. Joy DeGruy.

The films central assertion is that European culture and supremacy have, over the millennia, actively and effectively removed the African origins and influence from history books. Why? Because much of what we consider civilized and enlightened today finds its roots in Africa. The world has systematically devalued the contributions of Africans by taking away their history and language while interfering with psychological factors involving African values, interests, and principles.

delves intothe untold history of African people and the systemic removal of their history for supremacist reasons.

The experts interviewed throughoutOut of Darknessgo far back in time to the origins of man and the development of the Nile Valley Civilization. The Nile Valley created the first language (what Westerners refer to as hieroglyphics), the first use of paper, and the first documentation of events. Or what we now know as history. The valley was also the birthplace of the first government, a system of time, and the original calendar. It was also the first to discover the Earth was round and orbited the sun, unlike its Western counterparts. Africans were also the first to explore beyond their borders and travel across the Atlantic. Historians claim that Africans reached North America long before Native Americans.

Western education has robbed generations of Africans, particularly its children, of the pride of being true inventors, philosophers, and explorers. One point was that algebra and geometry were created in Africa, evidenced partially on the sciences root names. But, of course, these disciplines are credited as Western constructs.

You cant discuss race in America without talking about slavery.Out of Darknessgoes at length into the psychological damage of U.S. Slavery and the resulting post-traumatic slave disorder. Christ offers a detailed overview of systematic racism and an even more comprehensive definition of white supremacy and privilege.

See the original post here:
Out of Darkness - Film Threat

MARTIN, Tenn. The University of Tennessee at Martin has a large set of events for this years Black History Month.

The universitys news release says the 22nd annual Civil Rights Conference will feature four speakers, and will have both in-person and virtual events.

We are excited about creating a space for healthy dialogue and discussion during this years conference, said Anthony Prewitt, co-interim director for student life and multicultural affairs. We have some dynamic speakers, engaging topics and panels, and we look forward tocreating opportunities for broadening horizons intellectually.

UT Martin says on Feb. 3, LaTosha Brown, a social strategist and co-founder of the Black Votes Matter Fund, will speak at 6 p.m.

On Feb. 7, UT Martin says Cyntoia Brown Long, an author, speaker and advocate for criminal justice reform and victim of trafficking, will share her story at 6 p.m. in the Boling University Centers Watkins Auditorium.

On Feb. 17, Hannibal Johnson, an attorney, and author of Black Wall Street will speak at 6 p.m. in the Watkins Auditorium, the university says.

And on Feb. 24, Tim Wise, an activist and writer, will address the topic White Like Me: Reflections on Race from a Privileged Son at 6 p.m. on Thursday, Feb. 24, in Watkins Auditorium.

Additional events at UT Martin include:

You can find and register for more events here.

You can find more local news through the WBBJ 7 Eyewitness News app.

See the original post here:
UT Martin to hosts multiple Black History Month events - WBBJ TV - WBBJ-TV

Loose group of white nationalist activists, provocateurs, and internet trolls

Political party

Groypers, sometimes called the Groyper Army, are a group of white nationalist and far-right activists, provocateurs, and internet trolls who are notable for their attempts to introduce far-right politics into mainstream conservatism in the United States, their participation in the 2021 United States Capitol attack and the protests leading up to that, and their extremist views. They are known for targeting other conservative groups and individuals whose agendas they view as too moderate and insufficiently nationalist.[3][4] The Groyper movement has been described as white nationalist, homophobic, nativist, fascist, sexist, antisemitic, and an attempt to rebrand the alt-right movement.[2][5][6][7]

While Groypers are a loosely defined group with no formal leadership structure, they are generally considered to be followers of Nick Fuentes, a white nationalist, far-right political commentator and podcaster.[8][2] Michelle Malkin, a conservative blogger and political commentator, has referred to herself as the "mommy" of the Groyper movement.[9][10]

In February 2021, the Groyper movement splintered between Nick Fuentes and Patrick Casey over fears of infiltration by federal informants and doxing at the 2021 America First Political Action Conference, held by Fuentes. Jaden McNeil of America First Students joined in support of Fuentes' conference and accused Casey of disloyalty to Fuentes.[11][12]

Groypers are extremely conservative and critical of more mainstream conservative organizations, which they believe to be insufficiently nationalist and pro-white. Groypers and their leaders have tried to position the group's ideology as being based around "Christian conservatism", "traditional values", and "American nationalism". Some Groypers downplay the extremism of their positions, and instruct others on how to engage in entryism and radicalization tactics such as slowly introducing their targets to increasingly extreme ideas. Despite attempts to brand themselves more moderately, the group is widely recognized as white nationalist, antisemitic, and homophobic.[1][15]

According to the Anti-Defamation League, Groypers blame the mainstream conservative movement as well as the political left for what they view as "destroying white America". They oppose immigration and globalism. Groypers support "traditional" values and Christianity and oppose feminism and LGBTQ rights.[1]

Describing the relationship between Groypers and the Republican Party, Nick Fuentes has stated, "We are the right-wing flank of the Republican Party." He summarized his political ambitions by stating, "We have got to be on the right, dragging [moderate Republicans] kicking and screaming into the future. Into a truly reactionary party."[16]

Groypers are named after a cartoon amphibian named "Groyper", which is a variant of the Internet meme Pepe the Frog. Groyper is depicted as a rotund, green, frog-like creature, often in a sitting position with its chin resting on interlocked fingers.[17][18] There is some disagreement around the specifics of Groyper: it is alternatively said to be a depiction of the Pepe character,[5] a different character from Pepe but of the same species,[19] or a toad.[17] The Groyper meme was used as early as 2015, and became popular in 2017.[20]

In 2018, a group of computer scientists studying hateful speech on Twitter observed the Groyper image being used frequently in account avatars among the accounts identified as "hateful" in their dataset. The researchers observed that the profiles tended to be anonymous and collectively tweeted primarily about politics, race, and religion. Similarly, they detected that the users were not "lone wolves" and the individuals could be identified as a community with a high network centrality.[21] The same year, Right Wing Watch reported that Massachusetts congressional hopeful Shiva Ayyadurai had created a campaign pin featuring a variation of the Groyper image, which RWW described as an attempt to appeal to the far-right activists on 4chan, Gab, and Twitter who had adopted the meme.[22]

Followers of Nick Fuentes began to be known as Groypers beginning in 2019. Fuentes' followers are also sometimes called "Nickers".[2][23] In September 2019, Ashley St. Clair, a "brand ambassador" for the conservative student group Turning Point USA, was photographed at an event featuring several allegedly white nationalist and alt-right figures, including Fuentes, Jacob Wohl, and Anthime Gionet, better known as "Baked Alaska". After Right Wing Watch brought the photographs to Turning Point USA's attention, the organization issued a statement declaring that it had severed ties with St. Clair, and condemning white nationalism as "abhorrent and un-American".[24][25] At the 2019 Politicon convention, Fuentes tried to access several of the Turning Point USA events featuring its founder Charlie Kirk, including a line to take photos with Kirk and Kirk's debate with Kyle Kulinski of The Young Turks. Security repeatedly barred him from being allowed anywhere near Kirk, with Fuentes accusing Kirk of deliberately suppressing him in order to avoid a confrontation, as Fuentes had grown critical of Kirk's positions, which he believes are too weak.[18]

In the fall of 2019, Kirk launched a college speaking tour with Turning Point USA titled "Culture War," featuring himself alongside such guests as Senator Rand Paul, Donald Trump Jr., Kimberly Guilfoyle, Lara Trump, and Congressman Dan Crenshaw.[1] In retaliation for the firing of St. Clair and the Politicon incident, Fuentes subsequently began organizing a social media campaign asking his followers to go to Kirk's events and ask provocative and controversial leading questions regarding his stances on immigration, Israel, and LGBT rights during the question-and-answer sessions, for the purpose of exposing Kirk as a "fake conservative". At a Culture War event hosted by Ohio State University on October 29, eleven out of fourteen questions during the Q&A section were asked by Groypers.[26] Groypers asked questions including, "Can you prove that our white European ideals will be maintained if the country is no longer made up of white European descendants?" and "How does anal sex help us win the culture war?"[27] Fuentes' social media campaign against Kirk became known as the "Groyper Wars".[5][17] Kirk and others at Turning Point USA, including Benny Johnson and spokesman Rob Smitha gay black veteran of the Iraq War, and Kirk's co-host at the Ohio State speaking eventbegan labeling the questioners as white supremacists and anti-Semites.[18][28]

Another Turning Point USA event targeted by the Groypers was a promotional event for Donald Trump Jr.'s book Triggered, featuring Trump, Kirk, and Guilfoyle at the University of California, Los Angeles in November 2019. Anticipating further questions from Fuentes' followers, it was announced that the originally planned Q&A portion of the event would be canceled, which led to heckling and boos from the mostly pro-Trump audience.[29] The disruptions eventually forced them to cut the event short after 30 minutes, when it was originally scheduled to last for two hours.[30][31][8]

Groypers' targets for heckling quickly expanded beyond Charlie Kirk and Turning Point USA.[17] Groypers began targeting other mainstream conservative groups and individuals, which they sometimes collectively call "Conservative Inc.", including events hosted by Young America's Foundation and their student outreach branch Young Americans for Freedom, which included such speakers as Ben Shapiro and Matt Walsh of The Daily Wire, and Jonah Goldberg of The Dispatch.[3] Questions posed to their opponents often focus on topics including United StatesIsrael relations, immigration policy, affirmative action, and LGTBQ conservatives.[4][5] They regularly use anti-Semitic dogwhistles in their confrontations with other conservatives, including numerous questions about the USS Liberty incident, and references to the "dancing Israelis" conspiracy theory alleging Israeli involvement in the September 11 attacks.[35][1]

In December 2019, Fuentes announced and held the Groyper Leadership Summit in Florida. A small group attended the event in person, and attendees also joined via livestream. The event was held at the same time and in the same city as Turning Point USA's Student Action Summit (SAS); Groypers argued with SAS attendees outside of their venue, and Fuentes, Patrick Casey, and some Groypers were removed from the SAS venue after attempting to enter. At the Groyper Leadership Summit, Fuentes, Casey, and former InfoWars contributor Jake Lloyd spoke about the Groypers' strategy and ideology. While outside the venue where Turning Point's event was being held, Fuentes eventually crossed paths with Ben Shapiro, who was on his way to the event with his pregnant wife and two children. Fuentes confronted Shapiro over his Stanford speech, while Shapiro refused to acknowledge him.[37] Fuentes faced widespread condemnation from politicians and various punditsincluding Nikki Haley, Meghan McCain, Sebastian Gorka, Megyn Kelly, and Michael Avenattifor confronting Shapiro while he was with his family.[38]

In January 2020, Groyper and former leader of Kansas State University's Turning Point USA chapter Jaden McNeil formed the Kansas State University organization America First Students. The group, which shares a name with Fuentes' America First podcast, was conceived at the Groyper Leadership Summit, and Groyper leaders have helped promote the group. The America First Students organization, which states it was formed "in defense of Christian values, strong families, closed borders, and the American worker," is considered to push the Groyper movement.[6][7]

In February 2020, Fuentes spoke at several events that were held as rival events to the Conservative Political Action Conference. One such event, hosted by the online publication National File, featured Fuentes, Alex Jones of InfoWars, and Proud Boys founder Gavin McInnes.[39][40] Fuentes hosted the first annual America First Political Action Conference, which included such speakers as Patrick Casey, former Daily Caller author Scott Greer, and Malkin.[41]

Groypers are very active online, particularly on Twitter, and have engaged in targeted harassment against opponents.[26] Financial Times reported that many Groypers use "deceptively anodyne" Twitter biographies, describing themselves in terms that downplay their extremism, like "Christian conservative".[42] In April 2020, The Daily Dot reported that Fuentes and other Groypers had begun to move to the video sharing platform TikTok, where they streamed live and used the "duet" feature to respond to Trump supporters. Groypers particularly targeted one left-wing teenage girl for harassment, which began on TikTok but spread across platforms.[42][43] Fuentes and some other Groyper accounts were banned from TikTok shortly after the Daily Dot article was published.[44]

The Groyper Wars earned widespread media attention after the UCLA incident with Donald Trump Jr. Chadwick Moore of Spectator USA commented that the ordeal revealed deep divisions within the American right among young voters, particularly with regards to the political beliefs of Generation Z, or "Zoomers". This divide, Moore claims, is due to the Groypers viewing Charlie Kirk and others in the mainstream conservative movement as "snatching the baton and appointing themselves the guardians of 2016's spoils", despite holding beliefs that Fuentes and his followers believe to be in conflict with then-President Trump's "Make America Great Again" agenda.[45] Another Spectator author, Ben Sixsmith, claimed that Turning Point's unwillingness to respond to controversial questions, and subsequent use of insults to dismiss their critics, revealed the organization's hypocrisy after having "promoted themselves as the debate guys".[46]

Several mainstream conservative commentators also weighed in on the matter. Addressing the increase in attention towards the far-right due to the aggressive questioning of Kirk, Ben Shapiro gave a speech at Stanford University in which he attacked Fuentes (without naming him) and his followers as essentially being a rebranded version of the alt-right.[47][48][49] Representative Dan Crenshaw similarly referred to the questioners as "alt-right 2.0" while American Conservative Union chairman Matt Schlapp said that "there is no place in our conservative movement for those interested in fomenting hate, mob violence, or racist propaganda."[50] Conversely, conservative commentator Michelle Malkin wrote an article for American Greatness attacking Kirk for his immigration policies, and particularly his stance that green cards should be awarded to immigrants who graduate from American universities.[51] After defending Fuentes and his followers, Malkin was fired as a speaker for Young America's Foundation, a rival organization to Turning Point whose events had also been targeted by Groypers.[52] Malkin later would refer to herself as a mother figure among and a leader of the Groypers.[53]

Read more here:
Groypers - Wikipedia